All Episodes
Previous Next
March 24, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
01:14:16
LIVE @ 8: Uncensored: WHO's IHR Amendments Already IN PLACE By Default with Dr. Rima Laibow
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Reema Labor, who joins us shortly to discuss what we need to do about it.
You see, this is how these people operate.
They purposely put out confusing information that keeps everyone in a frenzy and distracted while the building blocks of the worldwide takeover steadily progress.
It's been happening for years, but the difference now is that we are onto them and we are not going to let it happen.
There is something that we can do.
I want to give a huge thank you to our sponsors at Goldco who are supporting your financial freedom while supporting independent media to get life-saving information out to the masses and stop this worldwide takeover.
It is because of them that we can continue to share this information with the world.
So thank you to them and all of our sponsors.
We'll be right back with Dr.
Rima after this short break.
The last time the economy looked this bad, the stock market tanked.
The economy collapsed and inflation hit record highs.
But at the same time, the price of gold shot up 1,300%.
It could happen again.
Can you afford to miss what could be the biggest gold and silver boom of our generation?
Not to mention, precious metals can potentially safeguard your future with tangible assets rather than just digits on your bank manager's screen which could disappear at the press of a button.
Visit the link in the description below or call 855-913-0814.
That's 855-913-0814 to protect your retirement savings and get up to $10,000 in free silver.
This offer is exclusive to the United States.
So if you're in the US, call and protect your wealth today.
We're joined now by Dr.
Rima Labo, a regular guest of this broadcast and a dear friend of ours.
Let me tell you, Dr.
Rima is such an amazing woman and we're so, so grateful to have spoken to her this many times.
She has so much knowledge and she doesn't beat around the bush and she's not going to again today either.
Dr.
Rima, thank you so much for joining us.
Oh, it is such a pleasure, Maria.
I'm honored to be on your guest list.
Thank you.
Well, we have a lot to discuss today.
We have people like Dr.
Mike Earden coming out and saying this whole gain-of-function narrative is nonsense.
It's essentially creating the belief that these people are more powerful than they are.
There's no virus.
We also have to talk about the IHR amendments that were already adopted and what this actually means and the timeline for humanity.
We want to also talk about the weaponized hatred and probably a few other things as well.
Where should we start, Dr.
Reema?
Maybe we need to talk about the amendments because this is the most pertinent issue.
These have already been adopted.
Can we start with whether there's a pandemic and then go to the amendments which are allegedly supposed to protect us from this and other pandemics?
We sure can.
Well, I'll just quickly bring up this substack.
This is on Pfizer's former chief scientist, Mike Eaton.
Why I don't believe there was ever a COVID virus.
So he's the molecular biologist and toxicologist, longtime leader of Pfizer's respiratory research division.
He explains why SARS-CoV-2 or a COVID virus never existed.
This is a really interesting substack.
And he's claiming that the lab leak or natural origin Claim the same thing.
There was a virus.
This conceals the ongoing debate over whether that's really true and whether there's a virus at all and whether they're even capable of conducting this gain-of-function research program at all.
But Dr.
Yadin is not saying there are no viruses.
He's not wading into that particular swamp.
And I think no one should wade into it because whether there are viruses per se or not, we've still got the situation that we've got.
And he's saying that there was no virus genetically engineered, created, leaked from a laboratory, gain-of-function research didn't cause the problems we have, and At the same time he's saying there is no gain of function research.
So that's a rather important piece of perspective from someone who has every reason to know.
Yeah, I mean, it is definitely a possibility that these people are blowing this up, making everyone fearful of gain of function, where this is really something else or not anything at all.
I will say that in Australia's Pandemic Preparedness Plan, they're calling for the legalisation of gain of function.
They claim that it's because we need to be researching viruses that are going to be emerging due to human encroachment on natural habitats, which of course are contributing to climate change.
You know, Standard science.
So it is something that Australia is calling to legalize, you know, something that the Bioweapons Convention bans.
But what are your thoughts on this, Dr.
Rima?
Why would we be calling for the legalization of this if they're not really capable of doing it?
Is that just adding to the Wuhan lab leak theory?
Oh, absolutely.
Absolutely.
And let me remind anybody who's thinking about this that if we mess around with pathogens and make them more pathogenic, what could possibly go wrong?
What could possibly go wrong?
Clearly that patents were being applied for and granted at least a decade before, actually more than a decade before, we had a novel pathogen which supposedly sprang upon the world magically.
And by the way, that's not the way diseases travel.
You don't have disease development within three days on the entire planet.
Doesn't work like that.
Different seasons, huh?
Incubation periods.
Oh dear, what happened to that?
So all these statistics that we were being told that there was this case and that case and so on, it's all nonsense.
And you know, in law, which I am not a practitioner of because I'm a doctor, not a lawyer, but in law there is a principle that says false in one, false in all.
So if you're on a witness stand and the The cross-examining attorney can show that you were mistaken in a material way or lied about something in one area that is used to disqualify everything you say.
So if there is in fact no such thing as gain-of-function research despite the money that's being spent on it, despite the interest in it that the people who want to control Our biological destiny, our social destiny, our economic destiny,
our reproductive destiny, and indeed our genetic destiny and whether we exist, those people are very interested in convincing us that we need to make things more deadly.
So that they can do more of what they're doing now.
And what they're doing now is deceiving and destroying us.
And I would rather not have that be my present and my future.
How about you?
Yes, I have to agree with you.
I think in this article, it's certainly something very interesting and I think we should consider it.
It says here, to this point, an ex-pharmaceutical industry executive, Sasha Lardypova, who we've had on this broadcast, Speaking with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
on his podcast last Thursday describes the extensive evidence of the contracts and relationships that were in place before the COVID era.
Contracts were signed for billions of dollars in February of 2020.
Not only would the required production never happen from a standing start to sign such a large commitment is ridiculous, but it cannot be done.
And she estimated that approximately one kilogram of DNA was required for this project.
There isn't that much medicinal grade DNA on the planet at any one time, although there may be now with all the PCR tests that were conducted, but that's because it's hard to do very expensive, wholly bespoke and difficult to store for long periods.
And the amounts of any specific DNA sequence required and held in store by commercial supplies would be milligrams or perhaps grams at a stretch.
So it was always completely unfeasible, regardless of how much money was thrown at the problem, to have accomplished what they claimed to have done in a short time.
So essentially this article is saying gain-of-function, that whole thing is a PSYOP. It's a PSYOP to get you to believe in the Wuhan lab leak theory and potentially increase fear amongst the population that gain-of-function at this scale is actually possible.
So with gain-of-function research and with the deadly virus that was thrust upon us so surprisingly, the compliance and fear was created to allow people to say, do me, do me, do my kids, do us all, oh, inject us, and inject us again, and inject us again, and inject us again, and it doesn't matter what it is.
If you tell me that it's going to make me safe, I will take it.
Oh, please, more, more, please, sir.
And that was the SIOP, was and is the SIOP. So why, you may ask, although you didn't yet, am I A person who says that we didn't have a pandemic.
What are you talking about, Dr.
Rima?
We've all had a pandemic.
We've all been locked up in our houses.
We've had our businesses and lives and child development for our youngsters destroyed by 22% slowdown by being masked and taken away from other children.
Oh my goodness, of course we had a pandemic.
No, we didn't.
We had a propagandemic.
A pandemic?
Epidemiologists know is a highly communicable disease which causes death.
It used to be defined as which causes death in a minimum of 6% of the infected populace, which has no immunity against the disease, which spreads widely and rapidly And affects a large number of people.
That's what a pandemic used to mean.
Pandemic now, according to the World Holocaust Organization or the World Unhealth Organization, WHO, pandemic now has no meaning.
It is an undefined term.
And therefore, everything is a pandemic.
In New Zealand, they had a pandemic when one person was alleged to have developed COVID, and that was declared to be a pandemic, and the whole country was locked down.
So we're talking about Political science rather than scientific science.
And pandemic becomes a term of art for social control.
Now, in order to have a pandemic, you have to have deaths.
That's by definition.
You know, having a toenail fungus afflict 100% of the people in Minneapolis is not a pandemic.
It's an outbreak of something.
In order to have a pandemic, a lot of people have to die.
So let's look at excess deaths before the rollout.
And the answer is I don't see any excess deaths.
What did you do with the excess deaths?
Where did you put the excess deaths?
We could look at Australian excess deaths.
Oops, can't find them.
The UK, Zimbabwe, the US. No excess deaths.
I guess maybe there was only a propagandemic.
And then we hit the rollouts because we all needed to be saved from the pandemic.
And then we started having what was intended anyway, which is a holocaust.
Sudden adult death syndrome, children dropping dead, myocarditis, pericarditis, aneurysms, ALS, cancer in the turbo form, etc., etc., autoimmune destruction of the body.
That's iatrogenic, doctor-induced.
Holocaust.
Iatrogenocide is the word that I coined for that.
I learned a few days ago that somebody's actually written a book called Iatrogenocide.
You're welcome.
But the point is, it is a doctor-induced death system, and we are at the beginning of the Holocaust, unless we take direct action and stop both the lies and the injection into our bodies and our air and our food of deadly substances because make no mistake their intention is
for most of us to die and call out to them to save us as we called out to them to save us with the deadly injection known to be deadly intended to be deadly and unless and until people wrap their minds around that The genocide, the Iatro genocide, and the political nonsense of a pandemic will continue to be brooded about and be swallowed.
Let me make one final point about that, Maria, and that is that in a modern society with functioning hygiene, with functioning sanitation, and with adequate nutrition, there are no pandemics.
No modern society in which those systems are intact or those factors are intact has ever had a pandemic.
The Middle Ages had a pandemic.
It had several, actually.
Rome had pandemics.
China had pandemics because they didn't have sanitation, hygiene, and adequate nutrition.
We don't have pandemics.
And if our medical system were functioning properly, we would not have widespread endemic chronic degenerative disease either.
That is true.
That's absolutely true.
And if we weren't being fed poison and if people weren't continuously buying packaged foods and actually eating organic foods, they'd be much healthier as well.
I think that we're at this interesting point, though, Dr.
Rima, because I have investigated the nanotechnology in these injections and in the skies in our foods.
It's the materials that are being found in foods and in the air are able, you know, we've got graphene oxide in the skies.
Yes.
What's happening now is that there's this debate, and it's like a tug of war between some people saying, no, it's not possible that the injections have this, it's nonsense.
Some people saying, this is actually the delivery system for future symptoms that appear as though people are sick.
This could very well be, because I know that Todd Callender and Lisa McGee have found yeast and programmable viruses, if you will, technological, part technological, part biological viruses, Patterns for programmable symptoms and things of this nature through the injections.
So what we have now, and this could be the case with this fungus in the United States, Is, you know, an activation technologically of certain symptoms or even illnesses inside of people.
It's really like we've entered the twilight zone.
And so I think that, you know, the sad thing is many physicians who've come out of Big Pharma and have woken up and seen what this actually is still haven't caught up with the fact that we're far more advanced technologically than we think we are.
Oh, absolutely.
Let me first say that any physician who is still following the party line about COVID and about the injections and so on Deserves to lose his or her license and be tried for crimes against humanity.
At the beginning of this rollout, this jab rollout, you could say, well, they had the best information they thought they had given to them by the government and so on.
But now that physicians are seeing the turbo cancers and the children dropping dead and so on and so on, if they are not taking Serious consideration of the fact that these are novel symptoms or novel patterns of disease and destruction that have never before occurred in human experience and that they are part of the problem.
If they can't see their way to that and if they can't speak honestly and serve the needs of their patients, then they do not deserve To be in a position of trust, authority, or freedom.
They deserve to be behind bars.
Let me put it that way.
And I am a physician.
I understand the pressures that are put on physicians to which I say, you have a job to do.
And that's to treat people and increase their health, not to slaughter them because you're a coward.
Amen.
I agree.
100%.
And, you know, I long ago came to this point of, you know, saying there's zero excuse anymore.
We're now at the stage where we have to say, no, no, if you are a politician or a journalist or someone in media or anyone that was involved with pushing these injections, you are guilty of crimes against humanity.
There is no excuse of I was just doing my job.
You know, we are, the people need to demand, there's enough evidence out there now for the people to demand the accountability phase of this scam.
Absolutely.
The problem is that, again, you know, even within the freedom medical movement, We have so much disagreement about what this is.
Is it a virus?
Isn't it?
Is there gain of function?
Isn't there?
Is there nanotech?
Isn't there?
You know, and we really need to go, we need to look outside of our own limitations and enable the public discourse.
But what's happened is weaponized hatred.
And this is where I'd like you to talk about how this has actually even, it affects every single person.
No one is immune from this.
The most powerful thing that they can do to us, secondary to killing us of course, the most powerful thing they can do to us is make us hate and fear one another.
Colonial empires have used internecine warfare and rivalry as their tool To weaken populations that they wish to control, subdue, decimate, and subject to enslavement of one sort or another forever!
That's kind of classical subjugation technique.
And that's what's happening to us.
I personally participated in very, very real and bitter struggles to make racial discrimination illegal in the United States.
What is in people's hearts may or may not change the way laws do, but legal protection, equal protection under the law for people of racial, ethnic, and other categories.
It became a reality in our country, and it became unacceptable to discriminate on the basis of unemployment, let's say, or the awarding of scholarships or other privileges and so on.
It became unacceptable to use those lines as ones to tear society apart.
and discriminate and suppress some people and elevate others that's all being reversed So that we have racial discrimination, we have gender discrimination and hatred.
We have rampant anti-Semitism, which has become chic and au courant among the health freedom organizations and practitioners, among freedom organizations and practitioners, patriots in various countries.
It's also chic to say, oh well, this These vaccines are engineered so that the Kazarian gene pool is unaffected and they don't have any symptoms.
That is Ashkenazi juice, which is complete.
It isn't even fantasy.
It's drivel.
It's scientific drivel.
But letters and numbers that sound scientific are attached to it.
And it's brooded about, as if somehow it's okay to We hate and despise and want to kill them because we're good people.
And then we have the religious wars that are brewing and the discrimination against believers of this or believers of that or followers of this text or that book.
You were telling me that the Queensland police now feel that people who reference the Bible as a source of truth for themselves, especially the New Testament, Are likely to be domestic terrorists.
Well, we've had that, I have to say, we got there first.
We've had that in the United States for probably close to a decade, when a handbook on domestic terrorism was released, an FBI confidential handbook for FBI agents was released, and it was made known that people who Referred to the Constitution of the United States.
We're likely to be domestic terrorists.
There you go.
Radicalized.
Radicalized.
Now, this is...
When I was in medical school, I graduated in 1970.
So maybe in 1968, something like that, the dean of the medical school...
That I had transferred to because I had made the people at the previous medical school so upset with me that they weren't going to allow me to graduate.
So the dean of my subsequent medical school called me in and I thought, oh God, what have I done?
And he said, I want to ask a favor of you, Ms.
Labo.
And that was a different thing, because usually I was in trouble.
I said, what?
He said, well, we have two very famous psychiatrists, husband and wife, who are famous psychiatrists from the Czech Republic.
There's been an uprising in the Czech Republic.
I'm sorry, Hungarian psychiatrists.
I apologize.
There's been an uprising in Hungary.
And they have fled along with their two daughters, the older of whom was a medical student in Hungary, and we'd like you to take her under your wing and sort of introduce her to the United States and how things work and show her around.
And I said, okay.
Well, it turns out, and we became very good friends, it turns out that her boyfriend, who also had fled to the United States, was one of the three main student leaders of the Hungarian uprising in which the students had asked to see The original works of Marx and Engels and the other seminal theoreticians of communism.
And they had been told that those documents were too incendiary and dangerous for the people to see.
So they poured out into the streets and they said, we want to see these foundational documents equivalent in some ways to the Constitution for us.
We want to see those documents.
And other people came out into the streets and said, yeah, that's not right.
And then the Russians came in with tanks and there was a revolution and so on and so on.
It was the thirst for knowledge and truth that the regime could not stand.
Now, if those people had turned on each other, the regime wouldn't have had to do anything.
They would have destroyed each other.
And we, certainly in the United States, and globally, we are tending to be lured into yet another psyop, to hate one another, to see one another as other as we can be,
and to despise and fear in the same way that we've been taught to despise and fear the novel COVID-2, SARS virus, SARS-CoV-2 virus, whatever that means.
And by the way, I don't care whether viruses exist or not at this point.
We all have bigger fish to fry.
But it could turn out to be one of the great scientific conundrums of our century.
But let's get rid of the genocidalists first and then we'll decide on the science.
So, hate is being engineered.
And we are being weaponized against one another.
Not only are our governments being weaponized against us, we are being weaponized against us.
And each and every time a person says, oh, well, you know, he's black, he's white, he's Jewish, he's Christian, he's Muslim, and therefore...
I can't affiliate with that person or I hate that person or I want to squeeze that person out of my living space.
We are serving the globalists.
We are serving the people who want us dead.
Or the very few who are permitted to survive want us enslaved and genetically modified and added to the internet of bodies, which is the chain gang at the DNA level.
Hatred is a tool for them to enslave us.
They don't care about race and religion and national status.
They don't, but they want you to care about it.
They want you to care about it because it's something that has divided people for many, many years.
You know, Dr.
Rima, you're Jewish, I'm Christian.
We have...
Very, very different religious views in a lot of ways.
We don't necessarily agree on absolutely every bit of information that comes out regarding the agenda either.
You know, you and I have had conversations before where you say, Maria, I disagree with you on this.
That's healthy.
That's allowed.
We come together on a common goal, which is we need to defeat this evil.
Just last weekend, there was a protest held at a church here in Sydney.
Sorry, there were people attending a church and there was a politician who was giving a speech on defending children from the sexualisation agenda in society.
And members of the LGBTQIA so on and so forth letter community came.
They broke a cross.
And it was a Muslim community member who was actually in attendance at that service who witnessed and testified to the fact that he had witnessed that they broke a cross.
That's a deeply, deeply religious symbol for the Christian community.
And this Muslim came and said, that was unacceptable.
That was a hate crime.
Why aren't we calling that a hate crime?
You know, so what it is, it's not...
It's not a line of, you know, only these people need to come together or only these people can come together.
The point here is that we're witnessing this unification of people from all walks of life, races, religions, it doesn't really matter, around that's an evil agenda.
We see that it's evil and it must be stopped.
And I think that they will do whatever they can To continue to create factions within the people that are unified on this one goal, which is to stop the genocide, stop the maniacs from complete global takeover, they will do whatever they can to divide the people within that movement.
Absolutely.
And they will put people in the movement who are invisible as dissension fomenters.
They are called fifth columnists.
They are called controlled opposition.
And the job of these people is to feed the pathology and to break any kind of harmonious working together.
Yes.
And throw accusations at good people, by the way.
I can't tell you.
I'm apparently CIA. I'm also somehow Mossad at the same time.
I'm also a Russian spy.
I'm on Klaus Schwab's payroll.
And we think that there aren't people injected into the movement that The only movement that can stop the genocide and stop the worldwide takeover to throw accusations at people.
I see so many unfounded accusations thrown at genuinely good people.
It's much like when I spoke to Rob Primo in Canada and he said they've come in advance knowing the next trucker protest that was going to occur.
And they've placed bricks everywhere.
It's like that.
And you don't think an infiltrator is going to come in and throw one of those bricks to get something started?
These people know better than anything that division works for keeping the people at bay from what they're doing because they're busy eating each other over here while they're still going up here.
It works if we allow ourselves to be divided.
Correct.
So, yes, if we say, no, I don't think so.
I don't think so and this is wrong and this is wrong and this is right and this is wrong and if we keep our moral compass intact then we are able to fend off those Those incursions into our humanity.
Because each of those makes us less liable to be humane.
Less liable to see each other in a spirit of love and camaraderie.
And if we can't see each other in a spirit of love and camaraderie, then it's okay.
To eliminate that population because they're not us.
No, they are all us.
I wrote an article, oh, must be more than 10 years ago, seeing this coming, saying we are all the new Jews.
Because it's not about Semitism or racism or feminism or transgenderism, whatever the hell that is.
It's not about that.
It's about allowing ourselves to be driven into small, balkanized factions so we're easier to conquer and control.
Remember, we have a common enemy.
They want you dead or enslaved.
How about that?
How about we focus on that instead of minor divisions?
Don't sweat the small stuff and it's all small stuff except for that.
I agree.
I spoke with Michael Yon recently and he has written several books on information warfare.
And he said to me, Maria, they will keep you in this loop of arguing about statistics and things that don't matter To take your attention, to divert your attention away from what they're really doing.
And this is something we all know, but the fact that he brought up about arguing about the statistics.
How many times have our politicians gone into Parliament here in Australia, for example, and said, well, the statistics say this, and they come back and just throw you into a constant loop of trying to argue about statistics, and they get nowhere.
You have committed a crime.
X amount of people have died.
I don't care what you say, you need to answer for your crimes.
You are a criminal.
You have committed crimes against humanity.
This is the point that we need to focus on.
And, you know, it's amongst all the other things that they're trying to achieve.
There is no point getting bogged down in the small details that don't matter anymore.
We have a common enemy.
The common enemy is trying to kill us and that's what we have to come against.
So on that note, I want to talk to you about the amendments that were already adopted because this is the number one issue in the world and anyone who doesn't think it's the number one issue in the world does not understand.
This is medical martial law With Tedros in power of the world controlling what injections you have to take, preemptively injecting the world on a constant loop.
And as you told us from the Immunization Agenda 2030 document, they want to introduce 500 new injections by 2030.
Talk to us about the amendments that were already adopted.
Dr.
Rima, please.
Here's some information at the primer level and if you already know this information, forgive me for sharing it with people because there are people who don't know this information.
And of course I know you know it, Maria, but your listeners need to know.
The World Health Organization, misnamed, it is the World Holocaust Organization, was always intended to be that.
The World Health Organization has a Director General.
The World Health Organization is a separate organization from the United Nations, but is a subsidiary organization that serves the agenda of the United Nations.
And there are a whole bunch of these other organizations.
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization, UNESCO, UNICEF, there are just bunches.
The Intellectual Property Organization, UPOV, There are lots of these organizations and they all work in their own area to take away your freedoms and enslave you.
Because they're all bad.
They're all part of this general overarching program.
Well, the World Health Organization Director General and staff decided quite a while ago that we needed to have a pandemic and we needed to have a pandemic control and we needed to have a response system and they cooked up something called the international health regulations.
Now the international health regulations were initially approved In the 90s, 1990s, and then they were modified and modified again and the current version, the third version of the International Health Regulations went into effect on July 14, 2007.
At that time, I noted in the things that I was writing about that once that Set of agreements, the International Health Regulations, or IHR, went into effect.
Upon the declaration, unilaterally unchecked and unquestionable, upon the declaration of a level 4 pandemic, and pandemic was not defined, it was anything they said it was, all world governance would revert to the Director General of the World Health Organization.
At that time it was Margaret Chan.
Let me say that again.
All world governance would revert To the Director General of the United Nations, if the Director General said, we got us a pandemic.
Look at that.
We got us a Level 4 pandemic.
Not further defined.
And I said, this is really, really dangerous.
Now, WHO was at that time an advisory organization.
But the international health regulations were legally binding should such a declaration be made.
That's interesting.
Legally binding on all member states.
Well, time went on.
Things went forward.
They tried to do it with the swine flu pandemic, but that sort of fell apart.
And by the way, here's a pop quiz question.
Do you have any idea how many people Are thought to have died from swine flu globally in 2009?
I don't actually.
11.
Oh, that sounds like a global pandemic.
It does.
Doesn't it sound like a global pandemic?
So they declared it as a pandemic but they gave a party and not very many people came because people feared the vaccine and refused to take it.
And I must say I did everything I could to help make that a reality and I'm proud of myself.
That fell apart.
The same thing happened with monkeypox, by the way.
They tried really hard to scare the gay community into getting these injections.
Sadly, a lot of them went and got them.
So I don't know what's going to happen to these people because that would have been another attempt to kill off people that they pretend to care about.
Yeah, sorry, go on.
Yes, exactly.
And by the way, let me point out that in 1972, the smallpox vaccine, which they wanted to bring back, was withdrawn from world use because one person in a million would have an adverse event if they received the shot. was withdrawn from world use because one person in a
Now, your recent data in Australia shows that approximately one person in a hundred doses of this multiply-dosed vaccine is having serious adverse events or deaths.
I guess somehow or other human life value has declined significantly.
Moving right along.
Oh, but the benefits, Dr.
Reema, the benefits far outweigh the risk.
Imagine you didn't catch COVID. You died, but it's okay because you didn't catch COVID. But you probably died after catching COVID anyway because all of the people are getting so sick and testing positive with a faulty PCR test right after the injection.
I mean, we'll just ignore that part.
But anyway...
I mean, the audience understands this, we know this, but it's important to never forget the ridiculousness of the crime that was committed.
My first husband was a biochemist, and he taught me something that was very, very important for the rest of my cognitive life, and that is the answer has to make sense.
And if people are telling you things that don't make sense...
What's the wrong answer?
Moving right along to the IHR. So they decided that they had enough strength, enough organizational and financial strength, enough backing from the usual suspects that they would now move to the next iteration of the already Approved and adhered to and legally binding international
health regulations.
And so the Biden administration last year suggested 13 horrendous amendments to the already legally binding international health regulations.
12 of those 13 amendments were put aside.
And other countries suggested amendments.
The UK suggested amendments which were approved unanimously and a whole bunch of amendments were approved which are legally binding this coming November.
But if your country, my country, any country exercises their right of rejection by having the head of government say, oh, we don't accept Either these particular amendments to the IHR or any of the amendments to the IHR,
then your country is no longer legally bound by those amendments, which were adopted last year at the World Health Assembly in Geneva.
And it's very important for people to understand that those amendments are legally binding and could wind up killing you.
Intentionally.
Yes, so I want to explain, just if I can here, that they have already 194 unelected, unaccountable, and largely unknown.
I'm reading off James Rogoski's Substack here.
Unknown delegates can easily change the international law by achieving consensus.
In secret, informal meetings.
But the method, what they're doing is essentially a silence procedure, which amendments to the international health regulations are adopted, requires neither a presidential signature nor the advice and consent of the Senate.
It is simply they've already made the amendment suggestions.
No one has pulled out.
Therefore, they're consenting through the They're silenced.
That's what's happening.
So as of November, if we don't pull out, we will be by default...
No, no, no.
Let me correct you.
Sure.
If we don't reject the amendments and or pull out, but rejecting the amendments...
It's a separate step from pulling out.
Of course, I recommend pulling out.
Every country on the planet needs to pull out of WHO and the United Nations, and that's an easy process.
It's hard getting it to happen, but once it happens, all you need is a letter from the head of state.
But what I'm talking about specifically, Maria, is that these deadly amendments, which have already been adopted, and we have new amendments coming up that are even worse, these amendments can still be rejected by any country up until the end of November.
And nobody's talking about that.
I'm sorry.
No, no, don't be sorry at all.
I want to ask a question.
My understanding is that the international health regulations or that there is some sort of a condition that they have put in place here where if a country opts out, they're still legally bound for a period of time.
So even if a country says, we don't want to be involved in this anymore, they still have a legal binding there for a period of time to the IHR, to the WHO. Maybe.
Is that something that's being proposed or will be in effect as of November, or is that already in place now?
Maybe sort of, kind of, a little bit.
As I understand it.
And this has been made as murky as possible to make it so that people say, oh, it's too much for my little head.
We'll just leave it.
They must know what they're doing.
They don't know what they're doing in terms of what we want.
They know what they're doing in terms of what they want, which is murder and enslavement.
If a country, let us say that magically, my magic wand were waved around and the Prime Minister of Australia and the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of the UK and the Prime Minister of Sweden and a whole bunch of other Prime Ministers sit down at their Well polished desk and write a letter to the United Nations and write a letter to the Director General of the World Health Organization and they say,
I'm out of your party.
I'm not playing anymore.
We're done.
Allegedly, each country has an obligation to pay dues for one year To the World Health Organization and to the United Nations, if they do that, and has one year before the withdrawal is considered effective.
However, if the country says effective immediately, we are no longer party to the World Health Organization, what are they going to do?
And the answer is, not much.
There's nothing they can do.
However, the amendments from last year's World Health Assembly in May, and much more so the amendments coming this year at the World Health Assembly if we fail to stop them or to reject them, changed the fundamental nature of WHO from an advisory body To a controlling body.
Yes.
The amendments among the 307 amendments that are on the table for adoption by phony consensus this year are amendments that say, you know those recommendations that the international health regulations make?
Those recommendations that WHO makes?
Well, they're still called recommendations, but they are now mandatory.
And mandatory is also a digital health certificate without which you won't be able to travel or live.
That means your social credit score, a la CCP, is created.
And that means that your country's economy is now controlled completely by the mandatory requirements of WHO and the international health regulations if the director general,
that is the dictator general, decides that there's a public health emergency of international concern or any of the six regional directors decide that there's a public health emergency of regional concern.
So let's say Australia doesn't think that they have a public health emergency of any concern about X or Y or Z problem.
But Tedros says you do.
Under these regulations, you don't have any opportunity to say, no, we don't have a problem.
Nobody's sick.
Nobody's dying.
It's nothing.
Because at that point, You've given over your national sovereignty and you've given over your personal sovereignty over your body to Tedros Ghebreyesus, a confirmed, known genocidalist.
And by the way, on PreventGenocide2030.org, if you go to More, you can click on the drop-down menu and you'll see Tedros.
It is a very, very interesting article based solidly in fact and documented reality about who this particular monster is and what he wants.
And so countries have allegedly a period of time after withdrawing during which they're still involved, except that in practical terms they really don't.
When a treaty has the basic fundamental nature of the treaty changed by one side or the other, the other side, the other party to the treaty under the Vienna 1969 Treaty on Treaties has the explicit right to unilaterally remove themselves from the treaty that the other side has changed the terms of.
So here we had a consultative advisory organization in WHO and a consultative advisory organization in its international health regulations which have changed their own nature to become Controlling, dictatorial, mandating organizations.
That's a fundamental enough change so that any country can say, I'm out of here without violating international law.
So that's a long answer to your question, Maria.
Did I make it clear what I understand the position to be?
Yes.
My biggest concern, especially for Australia, is that we have representatives in there.
I mean, we don't know who they are.
I shared something where he was saying, who are these people?
You know, if anyone in Australia knew, I didn't see them identified.
So we have these unknown people representing us in there, completely agreeing with the proposed amendments to the international health regulations.
I know our chief medical officer, Officer Paul Kelly was saying that, you know, Australia needs to, in fact, we're calling for the expedition of this.
We want it expedited.
We want it as soon as possible.
And, you know, it's just it's not the understanding or the agreement of the vast majority of the Australian population that we want this expedited.
We don't want anything to do with this.
In fact, we're trying to exit the WHO. So the problem that we have now is that if we do back off now, come November, according to the current timeline, come November, this stuff is automatically going to happen because of the silence, because of the consent, the perceived consent.
And then a year from this World Health Assembly coming in May, the same thing will be true again.
But, may I disagree with something, and I love James dearly.
We meet on a daily basis to work together.
He's a dear and much valued colleague, but I disagree with something that he says and something that you've just said as well.
And we're allowed to do that.
That's called a discussion.
It doesn't matter who these people are.
They are sock puppets.
They are professional sock puppets.
They are apparatchniks.
They are useful idiots.
They come to these meetings with a script.
They are not allowed to deviate from the script The head honchos have a little bit of discretion if things get out of control or go awry, but basically they are already scripted sock puppets.
And so if you exchange sock puppet X for sock puppet Y or sock puppet Z, what difference does it make?
These people are not functioning as We're protectors of our rights, our constitutions, our laws, our systems, our traditions.
These people are giving away their freedoms in order for whatever it is that they get at the feeding trough and they don't care what happens to us.
So I am, in the same way that I'm unconcerned about whether there is a virus or there isn't a virus, There is a political situation that is designed to subjugate, subdue, and slaughter us.
That's what I'm concerned with.
I don't care who they are.
I think they're despicable and they're not worth my saliva nor my consideration as individuals.
If they want to be individuals, they'll stand up and say, this is wrong.
But since they're not doing that, who cares?
Yep, that's a great point.
I think that the point that we need Politicians to agree on, if they're going to stand up against this in Parliament here in Australia, for example, is that The Australian people do not agree to this representation at the WHA meetings.
That's what I'm trying to say.
We do not agree to this representation.
They haven't been asked.
They haven't been asked.
It's been negotiated in secret.
I don't know whether your delegates have been properly authorized.
We have Great suspicion in the United States that the necessary legal authorization to send them to negotiate has not been followed through on.
And we've asked repeatedly for clarification as to whether they're even legal delegates.
We don't think they are, but maybe they are.
But unless the politicians who are fighting for your rights are willing, and mine and the United States are willing, Do we have any?
A few.
Are willing to stand up and say, these amendments must be rejected.
Our membership in the WHO must be rescinded.
Our membership in the United Nations, which after all is the controlling system for this badness, must be rescinded.
Unless they're willing to do that, then they're basically just rearranging the deck chairs.
Yes, I agree with you.
I agree with you.
We have an upcoming election in the state of New South Wales.
Not that I have any faith in elections, but, you know, I've made it pretty clear to people that you need to be aware of who you're voting for, whether they've made any comments at all on the IHR and the fact that we need to have nothing to do with this.
We need to put a stop to it.
So I think really the solution, Dr Rima, has been what we've said from the start, which is you need to put pressure on politicians.
I know that in Australia we've had some people coming back saying, we're working with the World Health Organization to improve pandemic responses.
No, we don't need to do that.
We don't want to do that.
The WHO... And again, not getting bogged down in the statistics side of it, but the WHO has failed massively as far as the COVID response goes.
They are not the best body to advise us.
Our local doctors know about our health better than...
I'm talking about the argument for the sleeping politicians, right?
This is the...
The point.
You know, telling a sleeping politician that Tedros is a terrorist is probably not going to win them over.
There needs to be an overwhelming public pressure on these politicians and education.
Absolutely.
Um, before this November date, I mean, or before this May date, but before this November date where it just automatically comes into power.
I mean, this is terrifying.
This is terrifying.
Not that I'm scared of these people, but the implications for the people of the world, it is terrifying.
It will allow them to, in Dr.
Tess Laurie's words, forcefully vaccinate people in future.
Forcefully.
Absolutely.
Uh, May I share my screen?
Is that possible?
Yes, give me a moment.
This is the cover of a WHO document which is clearly labeled as the guideline for implementing the immunization agenda of 2030.
That implies that there is an immunization agenda of 2030.
Oh yes, there is, and I also have that document.
A framework for action through coordinated planning, monitoring, evaluation, ownership and accountability, and communications and advocacy.
And they go on in this document, I'm going to reduce the size of this so you can see all of it at once, I hope.
They go on to point out that Immunization, jabbing people, whether they want to be jabbed or not, contributes to 14 of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals.
Now, these 17 Sustainable Development Goals, all wrapped in beautiful jargonized language, don't say what they really are.
What they really are is enslavement protocols for every single aspect of life.
Well, 14 of them The vast majority are enhanced by your being jabbed.
Let's talk about strategic priority for your being jabbed.
This again is from this document.
Goal.
Everyone be afraid.
Be very afraid.
Everyone is protected by full immunization.
That means every man, woman, and child on the planet receives every vaccine that exists, regardless of location, age, socioeconomic status, or gender-related barriers, regardless, too, of medical status and Need or desire as an informed consent.
Objectives.
Extend immunization services to regularly reach zero dose and under immunized children and communities.
That means everybody gets all of these vaccines.
Advance and sustain high and equitable.
That means everybody.
Immunization coverage nationally and in all districts.
Nobody gets out of this.
But how many vaccines are we talking about?
Well, introduction of new or underutilized vaccines in low or middle income countries And vaccination coverage across the life course.
You think if you survive childhood vaccinations, you get out of it?
Nope.
You have to make it a normalization to have continuous vaccinations.
Now, all current vaccines are being reformatted to be mRNA vaccines.
But that's not enough.
No, no, no.
500 new vaccines will be introduced and jabbed.
And if you think about the damage that's been caused by vaccines only pointed toward COVID-19, if you think about the Holocaust that we are experiencing, and you multiply that by 500, then you see what they have in mind for us.
And I can stop my sharing.
Those are official WHO documents.
I realized this morning in the shower, which is actually where I do my most creative thinking, I realized that when I was doing the research for my e-book, The Singing Pig, which I think I've made available to you and I encourage you to share as widely as you like, W-H-O, the singing pig.
You know, you can put lipstick on a pig, still a pig.
And you also know, he whose bread I eat, his song I sing.
Well, that's the W-H-O. So when I was doing research for that document, I discovered that every single one of the ills and evils that I had identified as the problems that the Natural Solutions Foundation needed to deal with,
and they were radiation and the weaponization of food and the weaponization of the environment and geoengineering, chemtrailing, And the weaponization of the medical system against people's survival and against their health.
All of those issues are where the World Health Organization has been active.
The opioid crisis was created by a partnership, a public-private partnership between WHO and Purdue, the pharmaceutical company, specifically to increase the profits of Purdue so that Purdue could give more money to the WHO. And one of the wonderful things that they did,
and I documented in The Singing Pig, They created totally fraudulent medical documentation to convince pediatric oncologists that if they gave children opioids, they were not giving them anything that had any addictive potential.
So if children survived their cancer, survived their chemotherapy and their radiation and those horrendous experiences, they would then be addicted for life to opioids.
Just one of the successes of this evil organization.
They are responsible for Destroying meaningful radiation protection levels, ionizing radiation, as well as non-ionizing radiation because they get money from the industries and companies that eliminating regulatory control serves and they do this over and over and over and over.
They are not a reformable organization They are a cancer on the face of our culture, our life, and our planet.
And until and unless we remove ourselves from them, we are subject to their depredation and their destruction because what they want to do is destroy everything.
Aspect of our lives.
The International Health Regulations has promulgated, and I know that you've covered this for your audience, Maria.
The new amendments coming up, the 307 of them, take over the entire economic system of your country.
Of your world.
Take over the entire social system, the entire information system.
No dissent is possible under these regulations.
And they eliminate human rights and dignity explicitly.
Not even putting those pretty words in their evil document.
They eliminate them if they are allowed to do so.
Yes, yes.
I mean, we've spoken so many times about the severity of the International Health Regulations Amendments, what it's actually going to mean.
It is a complete medical, martial law dictatorship over every single country.
Forcing you to preemptively inject yourself for future pandemics that are caused by climate change, human encroachment on natural environments.
You know, I can't hammer home enough what this is actually about.
We're out of time today, Dr.
Reema, but I want to encourage everyone again.
We need to continue putting pressure on so-called elected officials.
We need to educate them on this.
You know, I think that most people and most members of the general public would agree that 500 injections by 2030 is probably a little too much for the everyday individuals.
Plus all the ones that already exist.
Yep.
And so, you know, that's not to say that they're going to demand every single person gets 500 new injections.
No, they will.
No, I'm sorry, Maria, they will.
That is the plan.
Every person gets every injection.
Yes, exactly.
So the point is, you know, in there they've said to low and middle income countries, like people could argue that that's what it says, but underneath that it's talking about every single person having a lifetime cycle of injections.
So even though within their documents it doesn't specify that that is the plan.
And so if you talk to regular people on the street, and I know I have, and I've said, did you know that the WHO is trying to do this and I actually want to introduce 500 new injections by 2030, which means like a constant cycle of injections.
You'll constantly be getting these boosters and shots and things.
And people go, I don't want to do that, you know.
So it is one way to educate the general population, which we need more and more pressure on politicians.
This really should be the number one focus in every single country.
I want to bring up preventgenocide2030.org.
That's Dr.
Reema's website.
Go onto there.
Have a look at some of the resources that are there for everyone.
USA Action on that website as well.
I encourage every single person to keep doing this.
Don't let it lose traction because, as Dr.
Reema says, come November our silence is essentially, what we're calling the silence procedure, is essentially enabling them to do this forever.
And once this particular silence procedure has passed, it will be infinitely harder to get out of this than it was to stop it from occurring.
And that's the whole point.
Thank you so much.
I celebrate and salute the work that you're doing to keep these issues in front of people with knowledge and with precision and detailed accuracy.
I think that you are Heroically important to all of us and I just want to thank you for doing what you're doing and I'm so honored to be a guest on your program, Maria.
Well, Dr.
Rima, the same goes for you.
You've been at this for many, many years.
You've been absolutely instrumental in educating the free people of the world on what the plans are for their enslavement.
And we're at a point now where so many people are aware and paying attention to this.
And I really do think we have a fighting chance if people like you are still out here educating the masses.
So I thank you so much for your time and for your work.
And we'll be speaking with you again very, very soon.
Thank you.
I am not ignorant to the fact that with all of this truth coming out and the relentlessness of independent media to get the truth out about the worldwide planned takeover, that at any time they can draw their wildcard, which is the shut off of everything.
Cyber COVID as they call it.
They can flick the switch, turn off the electricity, the power, the communications, absolutely everything.
So you need to prepare for that.
It can happen at any time.
They've already warned us that the next two years we're going to see catastrophic cyber attacks, which are planned and created by them.
So if you're in the United States, head to heavensharvest.com.
Link in the description below.
Use promo code Z with three E's for 5% off your order.
They have very high quality emergency survival food, heirloom seeds, water filtration and storage.
If you're in Australia, head to Survival Supplies Australia, your one-stop shop for all of your survival needs.
Go to the camping and hiking section.
Look at some of the things that they have for off-grid living.
Emergency and survival foods.
I just got some more.
Even though I have some, I got more because I am not silly.
I know that I need to prepare for this.
First aid medical supplies.
You never know when you'll need food.
To have these supplies at hand.
If you're in Australia, head to Gold Bullion Australia Group, the best provider of precious metals in the country.
We trust them with, you know, with our finances.
And I encourage everyone to speak to them because the financial system is on the verge of collapse.
If you tuned in last week, To my interview with Martin Armstrong, he said the Great Reset, the economic collapse is guaranteed, but the success of the Great Reset will depend on the people being able to function outside of whatever financial system they create.
The way to do this is with bullion.
It's so simple and so, so crucial for everyone to prepare.
And finally, don't lose touch with your loved ones.
If you're in whatever country, it doesn't matter where you're watching from, head to sat123.com forward slash Maria.
They have phones, sat phones here that are used by the military.
They have the Bivy device, which allows you to send messages, even if you have no cell service, to your loved ones.
So you can stay in touch with them and make sure that if this, or not even if, when this collapse of communication occurs, you are still able to communicate with those you love and operate outside of the emergency broadcasting system, which I guarantee you will be propaganda to make you fearful.
All of these tips are the antidote to not being afraid when they do this and they will.
Thank you so much for tuning in today.
Thank you for everyone's support.
I love the people who stand for freedom dearly.
Every single one of them.
We may differ on some topics.
We may not disagree.
We may not agree on everything.
And that's healthy.
It's healthy to have some points of disagreement.
I always say don't believe me.
Take the information and do the research yourself so that you know for yourself this is the truth.
And that's the difference between independent media and the mainstream.
We don't give you your opinions.
We give you the information for you to form an opinion.
Disagree with me!
Good, robust debate is very, very important.
Go and verify the information for yourself.
And then take action.
And we can.
We are not going to let these people defeat us.
I don't care what they throw at us.
It's not going to happen.
We are going to be prepared and we are going to survive and thrive on the other side of whatever they do.
God bless you all.
I'll see you next week right here on Uncensored.
Don't ever let the tyrants rule your mind.
▲
Export Selection