All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 25, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
58:01
JABBED ARE SHEDDING EACH TIME THEY GET SICK
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music.
Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music.
Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music.
Music.
Thank you.
In Japan, from 1970 through 1974, there were 37 documented sudden infant deaths following pertussis vaccinations, inciting parents and doctors to reject the shot.
In 1975, Japanese authorities reacted to these events by raising the age of vaccination from three months to two years.
As a result, the number of vaccine injury compensation claims that were paid out for sudden infant death following vaccination dropped from 37 cases during a five-year period to just three cases.
Have we had enough of these killer shots?
This is the Dr.
Jane Ruby Show, and you're about to enter Truth in Medicine.
Welcome to the Dr.
Jane.
Jane Ruby Show on this Wednesday, January 25th, 2023.
I'm very happy that you're with me tonight.
Well, I think everyone by now understands that the vaccine industry for babies All the way through flu shots and C-19 bioweapon shots is nothing more than a cash cow for pharmaceutical companies who are literally committing murder in plain sight.
But it wasn't until the C-19 bioweapon shots that we realized this was really mass genocide.
Well, an old friend of the show, Dr.
Daniel Ngozi, is here again to share some startling numbers that would justify wiping out every injection.
Just rip it all down.
Before we get to my interview, though, I want to play a clip from last night's Stu Peters show.
Please roll the tape.
Put it on ice.
They inspired us to do absolutely nothing.
They arrested people and without due process, they put them in a gulag.
There should be people that are breaking them out of there.
That's what should happen.
And I don't know why any of these other people, I don't know, I can't speak to the hearts of Sasha Latapova or even Dr. Jane Ruby on this network who says you can't hold these people accountable.
That's a BS cope and it's weak and it's irresponsible and it's killing people.
We can absolutely hold them accountable, and I won't take my last breath, and I know that you won't either, until we realize that extreme accountability that is near.
I want to set the record straight and make this very clear.
I have never stated or implied that pharmaceutical companies should not be criminally responsible for the death and destruction of their shots.
I have never stated or implied that they should not be prosecuted.
And I was one of the first frontline experts in early 2021 to call the shots bioweapons.
Well, now let's move on to the Dr.
Jane Ruby Show, which is why you're here tonight.
My show has exploded in popularity, and it's all because of you, my audience.
You love the coffee chats, my after talk segments, and my shows in general, and I'm very grateful to God and to all of you.
For the success and the ability to reach even more people.
Because that's the mission.
That's the calling from God.
And I thank you so much for your steadfast support and for making my show one of the top shows on the Stu Peters Network.
Well, one more quick word before we get to the interviews tonight with Dr.
Negasi.
Do you have more than $50,000 saved for retirement that you can't afford to lose?
Well, Biden's pro-inflation White House sending billions to the Ukraine Is burying us in national debt.
You need to do something to protect your retirement savings.
And right now, thousands of Americans are using an IRS loophole to protect their retirement savings from everything that's going on.
Call Gold Co.
at 855-791-2619 to get your free IRS loophole kit and see how you could protect your savings.
You could even get $10,000 in free silver for doing it.
Call Gold Co.
at 855-791-2619.
When I return, we will talk with Canadian Emergency Room Physician and Molecular Biologist Dr.
Daniel Ngozi.
He's got some very interesting information on shedding and on the changes in your own DNA if you've taken these shots.
Don't go away.
Hello, I'm Mike Lindell, and in light of the recent events, your continued support means everything to myself and my employees.
To thank you, we're having the biggest sale ever on all MyPillow bedding.
Get MyPillow bed sheets for as low as $29.98.
A set of pillowcases for only $9.98.
In this economy, instead of buying a new bed, rejuvenate your bed with a MyPillow mattress topper for as low as $99.99.
We also have blankets in a variety of sizes, colors, and styles like plush, waffle, or gossamer for as low as $29.98.
We even have pet blankets from small size to the ones for your car.
Get huge discounts on duvets, quilts, down comforters, and so much more.
So go to MyPillow.com or call that number on your screen.
Use your promo code and you'll get huge discounts on all MyPillow bedding, including MyPillow bedsheets for as low as $29.98.
Get all your shopping in while quantities last.
Please order now.
Well, Dr.
Daniel Nagasi is an emergency room physician from Canada.
He's a graduate of Dalhousie Medical School and first-class honors and graduate of McGill University, physiology and cell biology.
He's also been at the forefront of the mass genocide operation from the beginning.
And Dr.
Nagasi joins me now with some incredible research.
Dr.
Nagasi, thanks so much for being on the show.
Hello.
Thank you very much for having me on.
Yeah, it's good to see you.
And thank you to everyone out there for watching.
So I actually came across this article from Citizen Free Press.
I was just perusing the political and social news, and it was an article that popped up.
It was an analysis of VAERS data from 1990 to 2019.
So three decades of data on VAERS. And what they found was that, so I think it was 58% of sudden infant deaths and unexplained asphyxia.
So baby deaths that weren't classified as SIDS, but they died for an unknown cause of suffocation.
Oh my gosh.
58% were within three days of a childhood vaccination and 75% were within seven days.
Of an injection.
Wow.
So this was something that came as a shock to me.
Now when I dug into the article further, this was an article by Neil Miller.
I realized, you know what?
Dr.
Naghazi, can you share the title with us?
Because we'll put it up on the screen for folks.
Yeah, let me get the article.
And this was published around when?
This was published last summer.
So this is...
I'm surprised they let it go through.
You know, there's so much manipulation.
Neil Z. Miller.
And it's Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death.
And I'll post the...
Yeah, we'll put it up.
Yeah, we'll put it up.
And then, I'll also get you guys the link to the article on PubMed.
So, back when I was in medical school, and it wasn't the end of medical school.
It was more closer to the beginning.
And that's about as far as I remember.
It was somewhere between 2002 and 2003.
And I do remember, and it was very interesting at the time, I remember a lecture when we were being taught pediatrics.
And one of the things the professor mentioned was that there was three factors associated with sudden infant death.
One was poverty.
Another was smokers in the household.
And a third was recent vaccination.
And he didn't get into any further detail than that.
But this is back in 2002, maybe 2003.
I think probably closer to 2002.
Mm-hmm.
And so I never went into pediatrics or a specialty with children.
I actually kind of liked surgery and emergency medicine.
That was my interest.
But when you go to medical school, you go under the assumption that everyone is working towards the same goal.
Everyone is working to help their fellow human being.
Everyone is there to help make people healthier and save lives when possible.
So I went into emergency medicine, started going to emergency medicine conferences, and specializing.
And the unwritten contract is that if you go into a specialty such as emergency or surgery, You will keep up to date with the latest research in your field in order to save lives or make people's lives better.
But the expectation is other people in other specialties, immunology, pediatrics, researchers, that they will be honest and keep up to date in their specialty and do their job They're part of the medical system to save lives and make people healthier.
So, you know, at that time when I graduated, it wasn't really concerning.
It was more, you know, I'll focus on my specialty and I'll let people do their thing.
And then, as I went further on in my career, I started hearing more and more anecdotal reports that, oh, you know, vaccines, they seem to have side effects.
And what was really interesting, and that must have been around 2010, maybe 2012, One of my classmates from Dalhousie Medical School, her brother was a member of parliament in the province of New Brunswick.
And so it popped up in my Facebook news feed at the time.
I wasn't shadow banned off of Facebook at that time.
And it popped up on my feed that she was extremely proud of her brother.
For introducing legislation in the province of New Brunswick to force children to get their childhood scheduled vaccines.
Oh my gosh.
She was a doctor.
She was proud of her brother for stepping up and doing the right thing with laws and through the political system to force kids to get injected.
And my only comment on her Her Facebook feed was that, well, you realize as a doctor, every single thing we do has a side effect, including vaccination.
Right, right.
We're talking traditional vaccinations back then.
Yeah, exactly.
And that was one of the things that, you know, I didn't push it any further than that, because, you know, you don't want to start a comment war, right?
You just want, like, what the intent is, you want to get your colleague to start thinking, hey, is it really right to force someone into a side effect?
Yeah.
Like, when I prescribe antibiotics, I say, you know what, you know, antibiotics, they do have side effects, right?
Yeah.
And especially if I'm not sure that a patient has like a bacterial ear infection, I'll say, you know, the more often you get antibiotics as a child, the research has shown that you get a higher risk of adult asthma, the more often you get antibiotics as a child.
So if you're not 100% sure, The ear is getting better on its own, then maybe wait and see a couple days before you fill this prescription.
And that was my advice as an emergency doctor, because I always keep in mind every single thing I do might have an unintended effect.
Of course, sure.
Well, this whole notion of forcing vaccines, so it wasn't new.
Excuse me, it wasn't new with the COVID-19.
Mm-hmm.
This is something that was happening in Canada that, you know, politicians who don't know any better, and then, you know, the really sad thing is doctors.
Doctors I went to medical school with, who I graduated in the same class with, doctors I went to school with are equally as...
Clueless.
That's the only way I can say it.
Like, how can you practice medicine and not have side effects in the forefront of your mind every single day?
And then to take that and then Turn it into kind of a social pressure to force people to take something that can have serious side effects.
Well, let me ask you, do you think this forcing comes from the incentivizing from pharmaceutical companies?
Oh, absolutely.
Yeah, talk about that to some degree, because people are, the average everyday person has some inkling, but they really don't have any idea how pervasive the influence of pharma is in medical school, I mean, how early it starts.
Talk a little bit about that as well.
Well, you know, I learned a lot about the influence and the history of pharmaceutical companies and their close ties to research, their close ties to politicians from that Neal Z. Miller article.
And so it was apparently in the 80s in the United States, after a whole rash of vaccine deaths, that The vaccine injury compensation system was established in the US. But one of the things that the pharmaceutical companies were able to negotiate and get a concession for from the politicians was a release of liability
that they would pay into a compensation fund.
And then from that point, they didn't have to admit that their product caused death.
Wow, that's pretty amazing.
I mean, that's really carte blanche to just not have to worry about any kind of injury.
And so the thing we have to ask is, you know, when we find an extremely strong correlation and 75% of asphyxia and sudden infant deaths and unexplained deaths being within seven days of an injection that changes the immune system...
Is there a plausible biologic mechanism where that injection is actually the cause?
It's not just a correlation.
Because the strong correlation, that's the smoke.
And then you have to see whether the smoke is dry ice or is it actually a fire.
So what we do know is these injections change the immune system.
They have some antigens in it with viruses for, let's say, MMR, measles, mumps, rubella.
It has something to stimulate an immunity to diphtheria, tetanus, measles, mumps, and certain viruses.
But what it also has, and what we know it's had ever since they started doing childhood injections, Is mercury and aluminum adjuvants.
Now, why is that such a big problem for infants?
Well, infants, their brains are small.
And when we're looking at a situation of sudden infant death or asphyxia, from a pathology point of view, your first suspect is, is there something wrong in the lungs?
And if there wasn't something wrong in the lungs, like a pneumonia, which is usually listed as the cause of death, because that's pretty easy to identify on autopsy, then you think, well, was there something else going on with the control system of the lungs?
And the control system of the lungs is in the brainstem.
And in a baby, that brainstem is tiny.
So if you get an aluminum or mercury deposition in the brainstem, both of which are known to be neurotoxic, they're toxic, they stop brain cells from working, they stop neurons from working, or they kill the neurons.
If a tiny little bit brainstem in a three-month-old brain is injured is poisoned by an adjuvant then it stops working and if the brain stem stops working then the baby stops breathing right well why do you think it's not happening to all babies well some kids are lucky enough that whatever neurotoxic injury It
happens that there's still enough brain cells left that it can recover.
And one of the false things I was taught in medical school is that brain cells never grow back.
They actually do.
So it is possible for a child's brain, a growing brain, even if it's been injured by an injection at three months of age, for it to recover.
And then I have to wonder, because when I was a baby, I had a febrile seizure.
During a fever.
But I have to wonder, and I'd have to ask my mother about this, whether or not I had a vaccination in the 7 to 10 days prior to that febrile seizure.
In the emergency department, we're taught, oh, febrile seizures, that's just something that happens when, you know, not fully developed brains in infants and children undergoes a high fever.
But again, you know, seizure is...
Is it just really that fever that's causing the febrile seizure?
Or is there another factor that is being ignored?
And that's the one thing that struck me over and over again.
In the 60s and 70s, across the world, any place that was a developed country that was instituting childhood vaccinations Was seeing sudden deaths, sudden deaths of babies, Australia, Japan, the United States.
And then it got to such a disastrous point, at least in Japan where they kept very thorough medical records, That in the 70s, the government studied the problem.
And after 37 deaths, shortly after childhood immunization, they decided to change the vaccine schedule so that children don't get immunized at three months of age when their brains are tiny, that the age has changed to two years old when the brain stem is significantly larger.
So then if you give the same tiny dose of childhood immunizations to a brain that is four to six times the volume because you're no longer dealing with a three-month-old infant, then the chances that that toxic dose of aluminum or mercury adjuvant becomes a lethal dose Is reduced.
And that's what showed up in the data.
They had a 90% reduction in deaths after vaccination by 1975.
That's amazing.
And you know, we still immunize beginning around three months here in the United States.
It's terrible.
So this has been known for...
Well, now it's over 50 years.
They've known that simply just waiting...
Till two years of age will reduce the chances of a vaccine adjuvant turning into a lethal dose by 90%.
How come the whole world hasn't done that?
Because that was published.
Nobody kept that data a secret.
Well, I would go back to the pharmaceutical companies and their influence, right?
It's been a free-for-all for them.
It's been a cash cow bonanza.
I mean, they're so rich, I think, that they've just bought the influence right across our legislators, our political leaders.
And now we find ourselves with this I know we're going to talk in the second segment with you more about what's going on with the COVID shots, why they're still prevalent, why they're still being forced, mandated.
But I just want to wrap up in the last few minutes that we have on this issue about babies.
That's really fascinating about their smaller brain stems.
One other question.
Why do these companies put Such toxic adjuvants.
What's the purpose of aluminum and mercury?
Is it to get it inside the system?
I mean, it just seems so...
And it's so toxic, like everybody knows about it, but, you know, it's okay, we're going to stay with it.
So the reason we're told that they use mercury and aluminum as adjuvants is sometimes the body doesn't react to an injection.
Their body's like, oh, there's some dead bits of measles virus floating around the blood, but it's dead, so your body doesn't worry about it.
Your body doesn't bother making antibodies because it's dead bits of measles, mumps, and rubella, and it has no biologic significance.
So what the adjuvant is there supposedly to do is to create an emergency situation for the immune system.
That the immune system sees the measles and mumps virus particles together with something toxic like aluminum and mercury.
And then the body thinks, oh, these two are somehow connected.
And because aluminum and mercury is not good for the body, the body starts mounting an immune response, thinking that these little bits of inactivated measles, mumps, or diphtheria virus are the cause of mercury and aluminum showing up in the blood.
So then you get an antibody response, and that's the standard explanation.
But then, if you think about it This was, it's more from a social engineering point of view.
And this has to do with one of the ancient, like ancient city-states back in Italy, or the boot of Italy.
This is thousands of years before Christ.
And one of the legends was that when this city-state wanted to go to war with another city-state, first they'd established friendly trade relations until they found out where that other city-state got its water from.
And then over the next 50 years, One to two generations, this city-state would go to the enemy, pretending to be a friendly trade partner, and slowly poison the other city with lead, aluminum, or mercury.
But at that time, they didn't necessarily call it that.
They called it they poisoned people with soft metals.
So the metals that aren't copper, metals that aren't iron.
And what would happen is that that other city-state would slowly get very...
Their IQs would drop from mental retardation from lead and mercury and aluminum poisoning.
Their bones would be...
And when the other city-state had been weakened through metal poisoning...
That's when they'd go to war, and it would be a massacre, because everyone's been dumbed down, everyone's been unhealthy and with chronic diseases from soft metal poisoning.
Yeah.
You know, that whole notion of the aluminum and the mercury garners a more aggressive immune response is still theory, I would assume.
And it makes me think of, I don't know if you're aware of Novavax in the United States, but the way it's manufactured is bad enough and toxic enough, but they add in something called saponin.
Which is, right?
You may know about it.
And it's kind of a caustic chemical from a tree in Central or South America.
And they say it's for that very purpose.
But I just think it's evil sounding.
I don't know.
What do you think?
Well, if you put some type of a detergent-like substance, right?
Like a caustic.
Yeah, like a caustic surfactant.
What it does is it breaks down cell membranes, right?
So anything you put together with that vaccine or this Novavax, for example, if you put it in with the caustic surfactant, then literally after you inject it, whatever else they put in the vaccine has free entry across a cell membrane because the surfactant dissolved the cell membrane.
Do we want that with a vaccine?
No, you don't.
You want an immune response.
You don't want destruction of cell membranes.
Because the reason why cell membranes are there, well, it's there to protect the cell, right?
If you throw a bunch of DNA at a cell, a normal cell is like, I don't want that DNA. We don't know where it came from.
We don't want our cellular machinery hijacked with some DNA or RNA that we don't know about.
And so the cell membrane keeps that out.
So then with the design of the Pfizer vaccines, they use Pfizer and Moderna, they use a lipid nanoparticle that can fuse with the cell membrane, so it can bypass the cellular defenses, the border controls that every single cell has.
So that's how the spike mRNA gets into cells.
actually to not whatever pay royalties to the lipid nanoparticle company and just use a surfactant to dissolve the cell membrane.
And then you can get whatever DNA or RNA that you're trying to, you know, insert into a cell against that cell's will.
You can just shove it in there.
Well, talk about invasive things.
It's just part of the evilness of these shots.
We're going to go off to break.
And when we return, we'll continue this fascinating discussion with Dr.
Daniel Ngozi.
Don't go anywhere.
Be right back.
Thank you.
Well, who doesn't want to breathe better and protect the air that your babies and children take in?
Who doesn't want to protect the entire family from chemtrails, shedding symptoms, and allergy problems?
Well, take a look at the Triad air filtration products.
They have something for everyone.
There's a home unit that covers up to 3,000 square feet, the Go that sits in the cup in your car, Don't forget the mini.
This is one of my personal favorites for your single room, a dorm room, hotel room, or any individual room like those that massage therapists use for their clients.
There's no cord to worry about.
You just plug it in and it takes care of the room for about 200 to 250 square feet.
With electrostatic filtration, these air purifiers cover every corner of your home and your life.
The advanced photocatalytic oxidation and the pulse ionization collect all the harmful matters in your environment and provide you with pure air.
You'll never need to change a filter.
So no expensive cycle of buying filters over and over again because the needlepoint ionization technology of these air purifiers means the air is cleared Electrically by charging the molecules in your home.
And the large home unit is energy efficient, which means it uses very little electricity and won't blow up your monthly energy bill.
And don't forget the personal Triad Air Shield.
This gives you a four-foot perimeter around you.
You can wear it on a lanyard, on your shirt, on your belt, your purse, backpack.
It's always there to protect you.
Go to filterssuck.com.
That's filters with an s, suck.com.
And don't forget to use the promo code RUBY for 10% off your entire order and free shipping.
Hi everyone, Dr.
Jane Ruby here.
Many of you know that I promote products that I believe in and have vetted, but I also promote products that I use myself.
I want to introduce you to Cardio Miracle, the world's best nitric oxide supplement.
I'm getting reports from not only the general public, but from experts like Dr.
Kevin Stillwagon, a frequent guest on the Dr.
Jane Ruby Show.
He's a treating doctor and experienced commercial airline captain, and he's reporting that Cardio Miracle is making a difference in reducing the symptoms in the jabbed, protecting people from the effects of the microclotting It's delicious, and I mix the scoop, one scoop, in eight ounces of water twice a day.
For those of you who've taken the jab and are concerned about your cardiac and circulatory health, my conversations with Dr.
Kevin Stillwagon and Josh Oder from US Freedom Flyers in an upcoming interview on the Dr.
Jane Ruby Show will show you them describing the benefits and the reports they're getting.
So check it out at MyPowerHeart.com.
Learn more and try it for yourself.
That's CardioMiracle at MyPowerHeart.com.
Enjoy!
When we went to break, we just started talking about some of the components in Novavax.
I've talked in my show many times, Dr.
Nogasi, about Novavax because they use a baculovirus as the vector to get the mRNA into moths, and I'm assuming other arthropods.
And the idea is that the moths make the spike protein by the billions, With their genetic machinery, and then they extract these billions of spikes, embed them onto graphene sheets, and then put that into the lipid nanoparticle or some other vehicle, and then inject that into human beings.
You're a molecular biologist.
You're a cell expert.
Talk to me a little bit about...
What this means and are people with Novavax, are they getting moth DNA into their DNA and would it integrate?
Well, hopefully not.
But again, you know, it's anybody's guess what's actually in the injections these days.
I mean, the amount of deception.
They've deceived me since medical school, right?
And that's over 20 years ago, right?
And they've deceived medical schools for over half a century.
They've deceived everyone, right?
And then the minute Any pediatrician or researcher starts to catch on To the toxicity of the vaccines.
Like, look at what happened to Andrew Wakefield in the 90s.
He was thrown out of practice in the UK. He was a doctor, and now they took away his license.
They censored him.
He had his research articles retracted.
And then down in Oregon, you have Dr.
Paul Thomas, pediatrician.
And he just looked back over...
His medical records over the decades.
And he saw that the unvaccinated children in his practice, they came in to visit him way fewer times because they weren't as sick.
They didn't come in for, you know, an emergency visit because of a pneumonia or because of this or that, right?
That's a really good study.
But there was so much, you know, medical journal, and maybe it was pushed by the pharmaceutical industry, you know, just bribing the medical journals.
I don't know where that came from.
But he had to retract a really good article, right?
And you know what?
I've done a practice review medical journal article.
That was plate removal in facial fractures.
That, I think I published, that must have been 2006.
Mm-hmm.
And that was a review of one very, very busy facial trauma surgeon in Vancouver.
And we look back at 13 years, so almost a decade and a half of data, and found out, well, he found out that A lot of the plates that he put into people's faces for traumas, that the plates ended up having to be taken out, right?
So that was a good piece of medical research.
So practice reviews, like going back, even with just one doctor's practice and reviewing a decade or more of their data, What they got paid for, how many visits with a patient.
That is a valid method of medical research.
And yet, for some reason, Paul Thomas, who does the same thing, but instead of talking about facial traumas, he's talking about disease rates in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children that he's followed since birth.
That has to be retracted.
That is corruption right there.
Absolutely.
These companies are getting away with, well, literally murder.
How does Canada work in terms of immunity, like legal immunity?
Is it similar to...
We've got several...
Things that came down the pike.
We had the 1986 law that was signed in by President Reagan.
What he really did was he took the responsibility for financial compensation away from pharma and put it on the backs of the American taxpayer.
People didn't realize that.
And then they titled these laws, you know, the Vaccine Children's Compensation Act.
But are these companies as, you know, free, scot-free from legal liability?
I suspect it's identical.
But, you know, in the Canadian political and legal system, I suspect there's a lot that is hidden in non-disclosure agreements that the public never gets to know.
And there's atrocious things that happen in Canada that I don't think would ever happen in the US, but I might be wrong about that.
Some states in the US are pretty, for the lack of a better word, corrupt and fascist.
I mean, the one example here up in Alberta, was that a patient in his 80s had a blood clot in his leg that was between two and three feet long and it was impairing the circulation to his leg and this was shortly after he got I think it was the second dose of one of the mRNA vaccines but before Alberta Health Services would let him have the surgery to remove the blood clot They
made him sign a non-disclosure agreement.
What?
Yeah, you're not allowed to have the surgery to remove a blood clot from your leg because it happened shortly after a COVID vaccination.
They won't let this patient have his surgery until he signs a non-disclosure agreement.
Wow.
Wow.
These companies are too big.
They're criminal.
They're getting away with murder.
I want to talk a little bit about, because it's a treat to have you with your background in cell biology.
I don't know if you're still doing public speeches and warning people, but I remember there was one last year or the year before, you were so passionate about the human genome being poisoned.
How do you feel about that now?
We're like another year, year and a half out from these shots.
Well, I've got a couple of things I want to ask you, but how do you feel about that now?
Are you more convicted as ever on that topic, or what have you seen?
You know, when I first mentioned it publicly, that was in a speech in Vancouver, November 3rd, 2021.
It's a great speech.
I wish there had been a complete halt and moratorium then.
Okay.
Because that was the first speech where I was talking about reverse transcriptase.
A study that came out, I think it was the summer of 2022.
So this was really interesting and I posted a little summary of that article on my substack.
They took liver cell lines and they gave them the Pfizer injection.
And so there's two things that are absolutely criminal.
First of all, after the Pfizer injection, they washed away the mRNA, and they used an mRNA nuclease to make sure that any mRNA that was left on the Petri dish and on top of the cells and inside the cells was destroyed.
And then they checked the DNA of those hepatic cells, those liver cells that were exposed to the Pfizer vaccine, to see if the DNA had a DNA version of the spike protein mRNA that was from Pfizer.
And they found that it existed.
So that mRNA that was supposed to not change your DNA is now proven, proven to change DNA in the lab.
But these researchers did something smart.
They didn't just stop there.
They checked to see what the reverse transcriptase levels were before and after the injection.
So their control group didn't have any Pfizer vaccine applied to it.
So those cells, they had low levels of reverse transcriptase.
Which is kind of the situation normal for the body, right?
After you're done being an embryo, you're done being a fetus, you're done growing up as a child, most of the time your body doesn't have a lot of reverse transcriptase active and reverse transcribing things because you don't need to be reverse transcribing things.
Then they check the liver cells that had the Pfizer vaccine.
And their reverse transcriptase levels were amplified.
What does that mean to the average person?
So that means there is something in the Pfizer injection, the Pfizer vaccine, that causes reverse transcriptase to be turned on.
And what is the evil bad part?
What is the implication of that?
Why do we not want that?
The likelihood that it was intentionally designed to change the DNA is extremely high.
Why would these companies want to do that?
What's your speculation?
There is a hidden agenda.
And you know, it's anyone's speculation what that hidden agenda is.
Is that hidden agenda literally all the stuff we hear from the WEF, you know, where they want a tagged and trackable society?
I don't know.
But, you know, certainly we see from powers that be that have trillions of dollars at their disposal, you know, they certainly have the means to do this type of genetic alteration of the human species.
They have so much money, they have so much resources, they can do it if they want to, if we fall for that trap.
Yeah, I'm worried that there's more of an agenda, that there's some intention to not just change the DNA, but to do many different things because, you know, they can.
They can.
And doesn't it shock you that people still, you know, rush up to get their boosters?
Or do you have a sense that people are really starting to realize that something's very wrong?
What do you think?
I feel like people are starting to wake up and realize what an extreme breach of trust has happened.
And this applies to me too.
I trusted my medical school.
I trusted that professor that when he said, you know, vaccination, this is back in 2002, he's teaching all us young medical students.
He's saying, yeah, vaccinations have been associated with sudden infant death.
And then he just left it there, and we all believe that, well...
That must be the latest medical research as of 2002, and it's priority number one for our publicly funded National Science Foundation, that they'd be looking into this.
I've paid hundreds of thousands of taxes in my career, and it's under the trust and understanding that what I pay, what we as society contribute, In Canada, it's called NSERC. It's the National Science and Research.
Anyway, that's the funding organization that pays out all these hundreds of millions of dollars of research to all the universities in Canada.
We do it under the expectation that this money is being used for the betterment of mankind.
I want to go back to the changes in DNA integration and all that and what it means for future generations in a sense.
But here's where I'm coming from with the question.
I get a lot of people writing to me asking me, Similar question to the effect of, you know, my adult daughter just got married to this guy.
He took the shots.
You know, she didn't.
Or maybe they both took them.
The parent understands that this is dangerous, but says they're trying to have a child.
Now, if they have a child and one or both have the shots and they have changed DNA, are they going to pass this to their children?
The only way to find out is to do a DNA sequencing on the sperm and eggs.
Okay, okay.
Now this is the scary part.
So when when the body's making sperm or divide making eggs, that's one of the situations where the body naturally makes reverse transcriptase, right?
And so if you have mRNA floating around.
mRNA that's not of human origin floating around in the blood because of a Pfizer or Moderna injection.
And that mRNA somehow finds its way into an egg or a sperm cell.
Then the chances are much higher in an egg or sperm cell that that mRNA is going to be changed into DNA and alter the DNA of that sperm or egg cell.
Now, what we now know over the past year is not only is the reverse transcriptase that's naturally active in sperm or egg cells causing a risk of DNA change, that there is something in the Pfizer injection that turns that reverse transcriptase all the way up to 11%.
That makes it even more likely that there's going to be a DNA and RNA change.
Because now all of a sudden you don't have natural reverse transcriptase activity.
You have abnormally high reverse transcriptase activity.
And that's what they proved in the liver cells.
You have repeatedly attributed it to Pfizer.
Is it because that was the only one studied of the two?
Because it's our understanding?
Yeah, that was the only one they did the cell study.
It's our understanding, right, that Moderna is a similar construction.
But here's the other thing, Dr.
Nagoski.
We don't know.
We've seen communication documents that...
That indicate that Pfizer was given up to 50% non-disclosure on their materials, on these vials.
So we don't even know what's in these, do we?
That's right.
We don't know.
This is just the stuff that we do know.
And then I was in contact with a couple of researchers in Japan, one who was at Tokyo University, Who I heard, it was impossible.
He's a professor, tenured professor, and he was trying to get samples of Pfizer.
Could not get them.
Like, was he going to study the contents?
Yeah, he was going to study them.
And the company wouldn't give them to him?
Could not obtain it.
Whether it was the government or the company or some...
He could not get it.
Tenured professor.
Getting paid for by the government because, you know, it's Tokyo.
So he's like, well, I'm getting paid by the public.
I might as well do some public good.
And since everyone's taking these injections, I should find out and independently verify what's actually in the vials.
Can't get any samples.
We're seeing worldwide corruption across all governments.
Japan, US, Canada.
This is...
Yeah, it's unheard of.
Talk to me about this transference that the layperson calls shedding.
You know, Pfizer had it in one of their documents, I believe it was in a protocol, that advised potential researchers on the multicenter trial.
That if a jabbed person had a partner who wasn't jabbed, that it was a serious adverse event, which isn't escalated, if they were merely exposed.
And somehow now they're not worried about that.
Do you believe that this shedding thing is happening?
And if so, what do you think is being transferred?
Oh, absolutely.
I mean, people's bodies can replicate and shed viruses.
That's just kind of a normal infectious process.
That's just the flu.
But from these shots, do you think something's transferring from the jab to those who didn't take it?
Yeah.
If a body can shed a virus, which is the size of a virus, of course you're going to shed something that's one one-thousandth the size of a virus, a spike protein, one one-ten-thousandth of a virus.
It's going to fly, it's going to shed, it's going to spread a lot farther than a whole virus, right?
And viruses, the small ones, are small enough to be carried along on air currents.
So spike proteins It's impossible that they are not being shed.
And that's just from the drawing board.
So all this damned lie that came out at the very beginning, that was when the vaccines were first being released, that was December 2020.
This damned lie that was being circulated everywhere, like little, you know, what was it?
Medical Express or, you know, the medicine for lay people's websites, right?
The popular medicine press was saying, oh, it's not shed.
It doesn't change your DNA. Flat out lies.
Right, right.
Well, Dr.
Nagasi, we have gotten to the end of our second segment.
I want people to know that we're going to continue for our newest segment called After Talk.
If you want to hear our continued discussion, go to my Rumble channel at rumble.com forward slash drjaineruby to hear the After Talk with Dr.
Nagasi.
But before we say goodbye to you, for this...
Oh, I'll just have a few words about, for anyone who wants to join for the After Talk, I'll be talking more about shedding and what places probably have the most shed spike protein and what it does to the body.
Okay, thank you for giving them a little teaser.
They love that.
So before we say goodbye to you in this segment and for the main show, I want you to tell people where they can find you.
You did mention your Substack, but anywhere else also?
Tell us how to find your Substack, what's it called, and how they can maybe support your work or find your other writings and musings on this.
I have a Rumble channel as well, and I'll post it in the chat.
And then, yeah, and my Substack.
Those are my two main social medias.
What's your Rumble?
Is it just Dr.
Nagasi?
No, it's just Dean Nagasi.
So rumble.com slash user slash D-N-A-G-A-S-E. And your Substack?
Because some people have all kinds of interesting titles for their Substacks.
Mine, the title is called Logical Surprises, but the address is danielnagasi.substack.com.
Okay, perfect.
Thank you so much for being with me today.
And for those of you, don't go away.
After Talk will be coming shortly.
Thanks, Dr.
Nagasi.
Thank you.
I'll be back in a moment with some parting words.
Don't go away.
According to Dr.
Mark Rosenberg, physician and army vet, the immune system doesn't just keep us healthy and safe.
It's literally the master switch for our energy, our clarity, and mobility.
So if you're feeling tired, achy, or worn down, there's a good chance that your immune system needs support.
Immunity has been the perfect back door for trying to take away our freedoms, but now Dr.
Rosenberg's number one suggestion for supporting your immunity this winter and all the time is BioShield MD with seven potent flavonoids to deliver targeted immune support by boosting your natural energy levels, improving your mental clarity and mood, and help you experience real joint comfort.
Click on the link or go to biomd.info forward slash Jane to check it out now.
Well, thank you for being with me tonight.
Dr.
Negasi's expertise in molecular biology gives us a special look into what these bioweapon shots are doing to the human genome.
And you won't want to miss the after talk where he explains shedding and he's got a new warning about where it could be coming from.
I invite you now to subscribe to my Rumble channel.
It's premium content that's always completely free to you because it's critical to your health and well-being.
You can subscribe at rumble.com forward slash drjane ruby and on my telegram channel where I break the medical news of the day at t.me forward slash drjane ruby.
Don't forget Getter, Gab, Truth Social, and Twitter.
And if you would like to support my legal defense in this baseless lawsuit filed against me by Dr.
Robert Malone, please go to givesendgo.com forward slash protect Dr.
Jane.
That's givesendgo.com forward slash protect Dr.
Jane.
Well, have a blessed evening, and I will see you back here to wrap up the week on Friday.
Don't miss my coffee chats Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturdays.
▲
Export Selection