Special Reports & Tweets - BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Nick Fuentes Does Marathon Broadcast With Alex Jones & Harrison Smith, Exposing The Truth Of The Charlie Kirk Assassination & MORE!

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 29, 2025 - Special Reports & Tweets

02:28:22

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Nick Fuentes Does Marathon Broadcast With Alex Jones & Harrison Smith, Exposing The Truth Of The Charlie Kirk Assassination & MORE!

Source

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	All right, I'll be completely frank with everybody like I always am.
	That's my superpower.
	I really like Nick Fuentes.
	When I first met him more than uh nine years ago, I thought he was smart.
	I thought he was funny.
	I knew some of his origin story, how he was censored, uh, you know, for just mildly asking why does Israel so involved in our country?
	And I I mean, I'm a routine watcher.
	I still don't have a lot of time, but I mean I probably watch an hour or so or more of his nightly show every other day.
	So I mean I'm a lot of time.
	I'm a regular viewer.
	I think he's very snarky, very funny, very witty.
	He knows a lot of history for 26.
	It's extremely impressive.
	I think he knows more history than I did at 26, and I've been a history buff.
	Um, so that said, though, every time I'm sitting there about to get him on as a guest, I call it a debate, because we debate things, we disagree on some things.
	But then I see things he says and does, and sometimes I think it's a little too mean.
	And so, but then at the end of the day, people need to stop being so nice in politics when the left and the globalists literally say white people are inherently evil, and Christians and Catholics are inherently evil, and white men are the worst thing on earth, and all of this garbage, how do you then get mad at Nick, who then says back to them, half of what they're saying.
	See, so you change the rules of the game.
	I'm not some closeted racist that hates black people.
	In fact, I've grown up in Dallas, had a ton of black friends, really cool, fun people.
	I've also dealt with racist black people that have physically attacked me many times.
	I mean, how many black people out there have been in, let's not exaggerate, 50 fights with black people?
	I mean, how many black folks have had at least 50 times that white people attacked you?
	I bet 99, because I know the statistics of black folks out there have never had a white person physically attack you.
	And we know it's 20 to 1, 15 to 1, black on white crime.
	I don't, in general, dislike black people because it's still a tiny minority of young black males that are committing around half the violent crime in this country.
	But when it happens, you don't cover it up and then or say it's okay.
	So people ask, do you agree with Nick Fuentes?
	I agree that compared to the extremism of the ADL, the Southern Poverty Law Center that is openly anti-Christian, anti-white, that what he's doing is healthy to get people to stop being politically correct and stop being bullied and stop feeling ashamed of being white.
	Because white people are under such attack, because by demonizing whites, the globalists can demonize the idea of the West that is incompatible.
	So they literally say, you don't want a Second Amendment, that's a white man's thing.
	You don't want private property, that's a white man's thing.
	You don't want Western culture, that's white man things, because under Western culture, the globalist system of tyranny doesn't work.
	And the communists of the 50s and 60s learned, this has been declassified.
	They admitted it.
	They couldn't get black people to become communist.
	So instead, they created liberation theology, the Ford Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, CIA.
	It's on record, declassified.
	To go, oh, make it racial to hate capitalism and free market and sovereignty and all this.
	So I think Nick Fuentes is very strong medicine.
	But you cannot deny that in the Groper Wars and at TPUSA that Nick Fuentes predicted six, seven years ago his movement would take over from inside TP USA.
	It did.
	That is the main reason Charlie, who I love is a great guy, really started going hard on Israel was because his constituency demanded it, and when he went to the universities, it was happening.
	Now, this is quite the long intro.
	So then when Charlie Kirk gets executed two weeks ago today, instantly they blame Nick Fuentes and the Groupers for killing him with zero evidence.
	Then when there's zero evidence of that, oh, five days later, no one buys it, but Bill Maher pushes it.
	Now Nick Fuentes works for Net Yo and is covering up that Israel did it because he got the call.
	This is these are bots.
	Now, A lot of people that aren't part of the bots pick it up and push it, but I know a synthetic attack because I've been under a lot of them.
	Now, the question is why do they try to frame Nick Fuentes before Charlie Kirk's body was even cold?
	Then when that didn't work, why do they go with, oh, he works for Israel because somebody wants to make it all about Israel.
	Not all roads lead to Israel.
	Like Nick said, you just hit that button, though.
	People are so awake about 95% of the time it is that, but like sometimes it's not.
	And now we're moving into the zone of it does look like a cover-up, then who stood to gain?
	And maybe Israel's there.
	You heard that Graham Marie were green Bray, really smart.
	No, the Democrats wanted him dead.
	He got 2.5 million people to vote Trump.
	They moved the needle and went from the tripled support in young males.
	It's Charlie Kirk and other things.
	So I'm looking for the reality.
	I want to be tomorrow's news today.
	I want to be accurate.
	I don't want to just jump on the first thing.
	I mean, I that came out and said Israel didn't have 100 million, 500 million views that came out and said the security guard shoots him under the arm, billions of views.
	And also get my ass sued off.
	Plus, I'm going to lie about some dude.
	He has a cell phone under his arm.
	They hear the shot, he goes like that.
	You can't just run around and accept every Kakamami thing.
	You can't just believe Netanyahu was in a trapdoor, as Nick said it shot him.
	Now, maybe Israel did.
	Maybe it comes out they did.
	I don't know.
	I think they're like the second suspect group if this turns out to be a cover-up after the Democrats.
	Then you can argue, well, maybe he was running for president.
	They were scared, so the Republicans got rid of him.
	Maybe, maybe there was a bunch of 500 million in the war chest, and there was a battle over where that was.
	And you know, I mean, you can go all day.
	You just can't.
	Nobody ever said that.
	That's you just can't say something without the proof, in my view.
	But we're we're entering that field house now, that wheelhouse of we have to speculate because where's the autopsy?
	They didn't have one, folks.
	They found the bullet, we better see it.
	Uh, 30 odd six does not do that.
	Doesn't mean the coroner's lying.
	He's told us 30 odd six.
	So the corner, the attending physician.
	So that's a big 10-minute intro.
	We got Nick to the end of the uh next hour, so we got plenty of time.
	That said, you're gonna have a debate every time you don't do that.
	I do think it's mean what you've been saying, Nick, and I don't want to go there first, just putting it out there about Erica Kirk, and it was a big production, and this is blah, blah, blah.
	That's what TPUSA did was productions.
	This is what he would have wanted.
	I saw you admit that.
	This is she's a she's a uh a performer herself.
	That's who they are.
	So the fact that they're putting a good face on this, I I you can even say, oh, the Republicans are being fake.
	Well, that revival was real.
	Realizing the left is evil was real.
	I mean, I I so I think I think you went too far on that.
	Um, but it's gotta be weird to have first Daily Wire firing you because you wouldn't be flown to Israel and brainwashed, literally, was your nemesis.
	Then Kirk became your nemesis.
	You've been defeated both.
	Uh, but you you know, you've got to have the victor's uh not even remorse, but kind of the victor's uh elegance to it at this nexus point.
	Um, so I'm not trying to be mean.
	I got a few of the things I disagree with you on.
	I see coming around more and more on Trump on the borders.
	He scales up.
	So there's a lot.
	I appreciate you putting up with a 10-minute intro.
	Nick Fuentes, you've got the floor here.
	You find it with Nick J. Fuentes uh on Rumble, and it's good to have you here.
	And also again to Trump next level and saying, oh, Ukraine on invade Russia now.
	I mean, more than a 180.
	This is like a thousand eighty.
	This is cuckoo town.
	Uh, so we're gonna get into that.
	Yeah, folks, the news didn't pick it up.
	You got to read a statement about maybe Ukraine will take all the land back and win and then get even more.
	So we're gonna hit that.
	Uh Nick Fuentes, thanks for being here.
	That's quite the introduction.
	You've got 15 minutes of the break.
	Go ahead.
	Yes.
	Well, thank you for having me.
	Uh, I think this is the first time we've spoken since Charlie Kirk was murdered.
	And of course, everybody's talking about who was actually responsible.
	And this is something that kind of has stuck out to me since it happened.
	Is so much has been said about the significance of it and the, you know, the gravity of the moment and what it means for our country.
	And yet, we still don't know all the answers.
	We don't know for a fact who pulled the trigger.
	We don't know for a fact Who was the gunman?
	We don't know for a fact if there was a wider conspiracy.
	And so at the same time, we're being told what it all means and what it means for us and for the country and the right and the left.
	At the same time, we actually don't even know what it is, where we're being told what it means.
	We don't know what it is.
	And I would say that there's been so many different theories about it as well.
	Of course, there is the official narrative, which is that uh the killer was a trans chaser.
	So he's apparently a gay man who was dating or had some kind of boyfriend who was a male to female transgender.
	And the going narrative is that he was basically some species of the left.
	We don't know if he's a liberal, Democrat, communist, socialist.
	We know maybe he's an ally of the LGBT.
	Uh, he inscribed on the bullets, certain slogans associated with Reddit or the furry community.
	And we can surmise based on some of the text messages that have been shown to us, but which there are some outstanding questions about those, that he killed Charlie Kirk because of his anti-LGBT politics.
	So we basically have a lone gunman theory.
	A lone gunman, 22 years old, clean record, no mental illness, no criminal background, gets his grandfather's rifle that was given to him, drives three hours to the venue, shoots this guy, one shot, one kill, gets away clean, turns himself in.
	That's the official narrative.
	But like you said then, and a lot of people were quick to sort of move past this, but I think this was really interesting.
	Within 48 hours of the killing, there was this what I believe to be a top-down narrative.
	It came from the left, maybe from the Democrats, which said actually, this was a far right guy.
	And the inscriptions were not actually very clear about his political ideology, but actually they were ambiguous.
	They were vaguely referencing video games, vaguely referencing internet culture, and we really don't know.
	And then they started to say, well, he's a groiper.
	All of a sudden, you have these viral posts on Facebook and X that were talking about how I had this conflict with Charlie Kirk, and there was this major critique from the right wing from Charlie Kirk's ideological right, you know, to his right.
	And so they said the shooter might have been a groiper.
	He was a video gamer, extremely online, um, political radical, but they say maybe he was of the right.
	And that was kind of the first big quote unquote conspiracy theory.
	Right out of the gate, we had the official narrative.
	We had this guy, Tyler Robinson, trans boyfriend, et cetera.
	And then within 48 hours, the first big conspiracy was he's some sort of groiper.
	And the reason I believe that was top down is because it was so saturated.
	And you, you said this earlier.
	You've been a subject of these attacks before, as have I. It's very apparent because of how quickly they achieve saturation.
	This theory was everywhere so quickly.
	It's very simple.
	The exact talking point explodes in a thousand places in one second, then 10,000 five seconds later, then a million five minutes later.
	It's a it's boom.
	Right.
	It's it's exponential.
	The growth of it is exponential, such that there was a poll released, I believe, on the Monday following the killing, and it said that 25, 26% of Generation Z believed the killer was right wing.
	More young people believe the killer was right wing, a far right radical than believed he was left wing.
	That's how effective it was.
	And that's how it's a good thing.
	What you're saying is key, but it's not just exponential.
	When it first appears, when you know it's synthetic, they will they will push at a thousand or more points instantly, the exact same thing.
	That doesn't work that way, a script.
	So you know what it's staged because they they put it out immediately in the first attack, everywhere the same second.
	You know it's being pushed by bots.
	That's how we know.
	Right.
	Right.
	It was instantaneous, exactly.
	Um, and so you got to this point where a week later it was even being parroted on Jimmy Kimmel.
	Jimmy Kimmel, of course, the reason that he was leaned on is because he said that the right wing was pretending that the killer was everything other than what he was, which was MAGA or far right.
	And that was really the first big thing.
	The second wave, of course, then came, and this was being pushed by Max Blumenthal on the gray zone by Cannis Owens and perhaps by Tucker Carlson, I think significantly less so.
	But there was this insinuation, Particularly from Blumenthal and Candace that it was an Israeli conspiracy.
	And they centered on this meeting between Kirk and Bill Ackman in August, as well as apparently some kind of payment, some sort of bribe, which was offered to Kirk by the Israelis directly to effectively buy his silence.
	And these were basically the three theories.
	These are the three theories as they stand is lone gunman, Groiper, and then some sort of Israeli conspiracy.
	And I, like you, want to get to the truth.
	I want to understand who killed Charlie Kirk.
	I want to understand if there was a conspiracy who was involved.
	But I, like you also start with the evidence.
	When you believe there's a conspiracy, when you believe there's a cover-up or something like that, you start with the facts.
	You start with the evidence.
	And the things to me that stood out as evidence that this was some kind of a plot or conspiracy had very little to do with foreign government and actually had to do with the forensics of the attack.
	Like you said, maybe the most damning thing is the bullet.
	If it's a 30 odd six bullet caliber, this guy from relatively short range is being shot.
	You would expect that you would see a much more graphic video than what we saw.
	Like I watched your show about this.
	You've been uh you shot Hobbs with this kind of caliber bullet, it goes right through him, one in one end, out the other, and this is a significant animal versus being shot in the neck, which is of course a much smaller cavity by such a large bullet from an even shorter range.
	Why did we not see, and you know, we don't want to be insensitive about it, but why did we not see a lot more blood?
	Why did we not see an exit wound?
	Where did the bullet go?
	Well, initially, it's not just a big bullet, it's a super magnum.
	It's going, it's going 2500, 2600 or faster at 200 yards, it's still at maximum velocity.
	So you're talking explosive when it hits.
	Size, velocity, exactly.
	It's just none of the details are adding up.
	That, that caliber, that rifle, the velocity, the size, the range, but also then with the video we saw, it just doesn't really work.
	And people had questions about it.
	And to tell you the truth, I was skeptical because I'm not a ballistics expert, and I think a lot of people aren't.
	And I was willing to entertain if the FBI had an explanation, I was willing to hear what that explanation was.
	Well, then we get Andrew Colvet, who comes out last week, and he says, based on evidence apparently that he received from the attending physician from the surgeon, he says that he was authorized to say, and it was shared with him, that the bullet miraculously stopped because Charlie Kirk's bone density was so healthy and so strong that uh that it stopped the bullet in its tracks and prevented other people from dying.
	And you know, that's where you got to pump the brakes and say, wait a second, is that really the word choice we want to go with?
	Imagine that.
	Okay, now we've got, and then TB USA is calling me their spokesperson, saying, well, let me give you the full story.
	But yeah, this man of steel thing, that's when I was like, whoa.
	Right.
	Because initially, I'm willing to believe, and I think it's true, that there are left-wing nut jobs that want to kill people like Charlie Kirk.
	It happens.
	There was a shooter at a Catholic church in Minneapolis a few weeks ago.
	Another left-wing person came to kill you this year and got killed by police an hour later.
	Exactly.
	And so this is a problem, Luigi Manjione.
	This is something going on in the country.
	I'm willing to believe, if there's evidence that that is the uh that that's the explanation.
	But when they come in and say, man of steel, miracle, magic bullet, magic skeleton, that's where I gotta say, hang on a second.
	Yeah, I know that doesn't make sense.
	So now I'm asking even more questions, actually.
	That's an answer that that raises more questions that actually it answers.
	And the thing about this Andrew Colvid guy, and I don't know him personally, I've never met him, but Candace actually had a good point about this.
	A lot of people don't know.
	This is a PR guy.
	This is a public relations guy.
	That's what he does for Turning Point USA.
	That's actually what he did for a company called the Kairos Company.
	That's where he worked from 2014 to 2019 with Marissa Strait of Prager University, with uh one of these big reverence that's a Christian Zionist, that was a public relations firm.
	He represents himself as a fixer.
	He is a Christian Zionist pro-Israel fixer.
	And so if it's that guy, because I'll I'll be super honest with you about how my thinking has been changing over time on this.
	When he first said that, my first thought was why would Charlie Kirk's producer and best friend, why would he lie?
	What would be in it for someone like him to lie or cover it up?
	If this man of steel superman thing, if that's a cover-up, why would someone so close to Kirk and friendly and working with him?
	Why would he lie about it?
	But then you dig into his background and you find that this guy is a fixer.
	He's a PR guy for the Christian Zionists.
	He was actually there over Charlie Kirk's shoulder at the focus group after the SAS conference where Tucker spoke and Dave Smith debated Josh Hammer.
	It was Colvet, the producer, who was hanging behind Kirk and saying, I think we could all agree that we talk about Israel a whole lot less.
	I think we could all agree that we don't want to talk about that anymore.
	And so it's things like that that actually just have to be answered.
	And I will say I'm glad Cash Patel, of course, came out a few days after that, and he listed all of these discrepancies.
	He talked about theories of different shooters and the bullet caliber and all these different things.
	As soon as they know there's massive pressure.
	Exactly.
	And I like that.
	I actually like that.
	It's good that there's pressure.
	It's good that people are on top of this asking questions.
	And I like that Cash Patel was specific about those questions.
	He didn't say we're going to answer everything.
	There's more to come.
	He said, here are all of these specific questions we've been asked, and we'll provide answers.
	And that just has to be forthcoming.
	We have to see the answers.
	Well, let me bring this up the bullet.
	Let me bring this up.
	Where's the autopsy by law to murder you're supposed to do?
	And I check with state law.
	It's the same law there.
	It's everywhere.
	And where's the bullet that was found in the neck?
	I mean, now I'm that's the question.
	We need the bullet.
	Where is it?
	And we do need an autopsy.
	We need to know.
	And because people also have questions about how and where the bullet impacted the shockwave in his shirt.
	You know, we're getting all these kinds of ad hoc explanations for these things.
	We need the official story from the people that saw the body, from the people that performed the autopsy.
	And that's the only reason.
	I know you said I was a little bit mean, but I do think there is this push to quickly take the tragedy and transmute it into political action.
	And I'm not ready to move on yet, because like I said, we're all being told this is what this means.
	Now this is what we need to do.
	It was the left, and that's why we need to take these specific actions in response.
	I'm sitting here saying, whoa, whoa, whoa.
	Actually, we need to hold the phone now.
	We actually don't know exactly what's going on.
	We actually don't have all the answers on this.
	Before we're told what this means for us and what we need to do about it, let's stop and think what actually took place here and who's actually responsible.
	So I agree with you.
	I think we need to see the autopsy.
	We need to see the bullet.
	We need to get the answers from the FBI.
	I I have been told, I've heard from people that claim to be on the ground, and I have some reason to believe them.
	They say that the reason that evidence may be withheld for the time being is they don't want to taint the jury pool.
	Because when the spokesman came out last week, he said something very specific.
	He said, in our country, the accused have Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial, jury of their peers, et cetera.
	And so this is actually common.
	They're not going to put out all the evidence if it's especially damning, because they don't, in a very high profile, highly publicized case, they want to be able to pick a jury that's not biased and get a fair trial so they could get the guy convicted.
	So that that could be a plausible explanation why they might be dragging their feet or slow walking some of the stuff.
	But as soon as they start to set that up and we get a jury and this is underway, all eyes need to be on the trial.
	What actually happened?
	What evidence is the state going to bring?
	Can they even convict the guy?
	Will they have enough evidence?
	They seem to be confident.
	The FBI, the local authorities seem to be confident they could do that.
	But of course, until we get that trial, until the state presents all the evidence they have, not in the media, but in the jury in a jury trial, we're just not going to know.
	We can't have any confidence.
	All right, no, that's why I'm out of it.
	We got to go break back in just a few minutes.
	I want to talk about the bigger effect of this assassination, the different political lay of the land.
	Then I want to shift gears into Trump's insane statements about Ukraine.
	Stay with us.
	Alex Jones.
	And Nick Fuentez is our guest until 3 p.m.
	Central, about an hour and 27 minutes from now, then Harrison Smith hosts the war room, 36 p.m., be sure to join us for that.
	I'll probably because some of those are so much news breaking.
	Nick, going back to this, and then just in general, TPUSA, I don't have many peers that I can know other than like Trump or a few other people.
	I'm not saying I'm a peer with him, but on a peer on this issue, where there's a horrible event and instantly I'm blamed.
	I mean, when they when that Democrat employee of uh Tampon Tim up in Minnesota, Tim Walls killed those government officials and their spouses and things, literally within one hour, the roommates blaming me and Trump.
	Uh so when it's a Democrat op like that, we're instantly the targets.
	And so if there was another shooter, and the guy was just a patsy who was set up, and I think the evidence is starting to really build to that.
	I didn't did a whole hour before he came on with a Green Beret and really smart guy about that.
	That's a consensus I'm getting from all these other Delta Force guys and people that are really smart and experts on this.
	Then we've got to ask who would kill Kirk.
	And clearly, you know, Israel does a lot of assassinations.
	He was having big fights with them.
	I could imagine they want to take it over, and a lot of those interests are coming in now.
	I just couldn't say it day one without evidence.
	I still might say Israel did it.
	But then the Democrats, I mean, he was one of the main movers getting all these young males to vote Republican.
	Uh, and then now he's gone, and they're in those discords watching it.
	They could have piggybacked on that and some of their groups.
	And then how you instantly got blamed.
	And when that didn't work, they pivoted over to Israel as a talking point.
	To me, that's the main suspect because that's the group calling for violence, pushing violence.
	It was a leftist came to try to kill you at your house, died in a shootout, wouldn't even hit the news.
	People said it was fake.
	You know, it was a local paper.
	I mean, when they come to my house, I don't make a big deal about it, but I mean, they knocked down Tucker Carlson's door.
	So you could say I'm prejudiced towards the fact.
	I mean, look at this today.
	You know, you've got a reported uh anti-Fub pro-trans shooter up in Dallas, so dumb, he's shooting illegal aliens at the base, and then supposedly kills himself, and then they've already released the you know, the shells with the anti-I stuff on it.
	Maybe that's a setup too.
	I I just don't just don't see that level of of that much corruption to carry out this much, but maybe I'm wrong.
	But was Netanyahu behind all the other trans shooters?
	Was Netanyahu?
	No.
	So looking at this, we have to start speculating now because it does look like a cover-up.
	Definitely, that was not a 30-odd sixth round that you know did that from my view, this man of steel garbage.
	So you don't like to speculate, neither do I. But if we have to ask who had the greatest motive, who would the groups be?
	I think that when you ask who benefits from the killing of Charlie Kirk, I would actually put Israel towards the bottom.
	When you look at if there's uh a series of different people, the reason I say that is because Charlie Kirk, as we know, was pro-Israel until the day that he was killed.
	And this is why it's a little bit puzzling to me.
	Like you said, I mean, a lot of people are now calling me a shill.
	They're saying I pivoted.
	I got the call from Netanyahu, they they intimidated me into silence.
	The reason I say that is because right up until he died, my critique of Charlie Kirk is that he was too pro-Israel.
	And clearly there was an evolution going on.
	I think there's an evolution for everybody.
	I think everybody had in common on our side, whether it's JD Vance, you, me, Tucker, Charlie, everybody was talking about how Israel is driving us into a war with Iran, and that their conflict in Gaza is overkill.
	I think that was sort of the consensus.
	And so the idea that they moved to take out Charlie Kirk, because he, like everybody, was maybe having some second thoughts or maybe some doubts about very specific things.
	He wasn't anti-Jewish.
	He wasn't anti-Israel.
	He wasn't moving in that direction.
	He had doubts about specific things.
	To me, I find that very hard to believe.
	So, in terms of who benefits, I think that Israel's maybe the least likely.
	And I would say that because Charlie Kirk might have been one of their few remaining true allies.
	I don't know that Israel would count Tucker Carlson or Candace Owens or you or me or so many people as better allies than him.
	I think he was pretty Reliable and pretty solid.
	Um, I think there is a credible angle, like you said, that who else might have wanted him dead?
	Well, people on the left.
	And I think that that was probably what motivated the Ryan Ruth character who was just found guilty the other day.
	He was out there at Mar-a-Lago a year ago, as was Thomas Crooks, who took the shot against Trump last year.
	There were people last year that said that there might have been an Israeli conspiracy when Trump was shot in the ear.
	I asked the same question.
	Why exactly would they want him taken out when he was taking money from Miriam Adelson when he was promising at that time to go to war with Iran, among other things?
	Well, let me ask you this.
	You keep going your train of thought.
	This is a key point.
	Clearly synthetic, immediate instant attack on you within hours.
	That should tell us who was behind it or who'd piggyback to try to who would want to who would want to blame you?
	I mean, how does that feel within hours?
	I've never had it this bad to literally be blamed everywhere.
	They have Bill Maher do it, everybody else.
	Why would they target you immediately?
	Who would do that?
	A, and then B. Who would target you and then push the story that you secretly work for Israel?
	I think a lot of that stuff was coming from the left, to tell you the truth.
	I mean, I saw a lot of these synthetic posts accusing me of covering up for Israel.
	It was coming from a lot of far left groups like the American Communist Party with Jackson Hinkle.
	It was all those types of accounts.
	And what would be their what would be their benefit in accusing someone like myself of covering up for Israel?
	It's maybe to divert attention away from the radical left-wing theory.
	If the guy is a left-winger, if the killer is a left winger, the left obviously wants to divert attention away from that.
	They want to deflect it.
	So what do they do?
	They blame the radical right.
	And then when it turns out it's not the radical right, well, then they say it's Israel.
	And the radical right's covering up for Israel if they blame the left.
	Exactly.
	So the bots are pushing us away from Soros and the left, who have the main motive.
	My gut, everything lined up.
	I'm not sure.
	But if it turns out there was help, but it's starting to look like that, then it goes to the establishment left.
	I think so.
	And I would also say, though, at the same time, you know who else benefits from all this immensely?
	It is the GOP.
	It just is.
	And you saw it in this memorial on Sunday.
	This was my critique of it.
	The real beneficiary of this entire thing is how the GOP is going to get to spin it, and they're going to say that this constitutes a new great awakening.
	This is the revival of conservative.
	I was going to go there.
	I was going to say that, and nobody said this yet.
	We're saying it.
	And I'm not saying this happened, but if you want to really war game stuff, it goes DNC, RNC, and then just chaos agents that want civil war, C C P, and then you got Israel under that.
	I think that's apropos.
	And I think that because right after this assassination, we're now hearing that there's a declaration of war against the radical left, NGOs.
	And on some level, I agree with some of it.
	I think that the people who celebrated his death, I think they should lose their jobs.
	But then Pam Bondi got on TV and said we need hate speech legislation.
	And those are two different things.
	And now all of a sudden they're talking about that's literally the ADL's main mission.
	And Pam Bondi is extremely pro-Israel.
	That's she comes from Florida and you know, with Ron DeSantis and all those guys.
	So, you know, of course, there is a tight overlap between the Israel lobby and the GOP.
	So you wonder it is the tail wagging the dog or in what direction is it coming from?
	But I almost wonder if it's some sort of GOP operation, because again, who was Charlie Kirk?
	I don't necessarily think he was uh he was an Israeli spy in the same vein as a Ben Shapiro.
	I think he was pro-Israel, but I think he was pro-Israel incidentally because he's a GOP advocate, let's say a G O P lieutenant.
	He was principally a party man for the GOP.
	And when the kind of ideology the GOP was against Israel's interest, he tended to defy Israel.
	When Israel's pushing us into war with Iran, he was chafing at the Israel lobby's interest.
	So so clearly there's a difference Between Kirk and Shapiro, as evidenced even by their final interview, where Kirk was sort of asking him some tough questions.
	So if Kirk is like a party man, who is he?
	He's a GOP party man.
	He's a bag man.
	He manages money.
	People were saying he might be on a presidential ticket, maybe in 28, maybe in 32, maybe with Don Jr.
	He's obviously super powerful there.
	Is it possible that he was maybe taken out as maybe competition and then becomes a martyr to empower the people that took him out?
	Okay, well, I haven't said this on air.
	I hinted it last week.
	I've heard that from very credible people.
	They're not sure, but there said Democrats top, RNC next, ChaiCom's or some chaos group below that.
	The story doesn't add up, and now it doesn't.
	So let's talk about that.
	You say we haven't talked since he was killed.
	We have talked on the phone the day it happened, and then in text a lot.
	Do you remember a few months ago I called you and I said, Nick, you need to be very careful because you're moving the needle so much politically that there's a lot of different forces in their calculations that are going to come after you.
	And I also, who else did I say?
	I said, I said, you and Charlie Kirk.
	You remember that conversation?
	I do.
	I do.
	I remember it well.
	And you said that uh you said this is the NFL now.
	You said, and this is serious, and you said they're coming for us.
	I mean, you basically predicted it.
	You don't get enough credit.
	You predict a lot of stuff on your show, it's off the show, it's the same deal.
	But let's be honest.
	I was simply saying, I've done this long term, expose the overall system so people can make their own decisions.
	Long game, you know, whatever.
	But I said, you and Charlie are the most prominent people.
	You got this battle, basically already took over his organization intellectually.
	And I said, because it's got 500 million in the bank, because the RNC is jealous of him.
	I didn't say specifically, remember what I said, the RNC and Kirk.
	And I said, you got to worry about the Democrats.
	And but I said he's got to worry about the RNC.
	So it's funny when I'm just being behind the scenes.
	I'm always honest on air, but I don't want to like say things without all my proof.
	Behind the scenes, I'll just really say what I'm thinking.
	And I'm not trying to say this, what you just said, but I just want people to know that there's that.
	And yeah, and so everybody that criticizes us, we're actually on the field, folks.
	Gladiators in war.
	People can sit there, not against them, the economy shot in your mom's basement.
	How you do better and all this.
	Just understand, we're risking our lives.
	And I'm not bitching or whining, I'm not a victim.
	Just understand, we're in the arena.
	We're actual gladiators here.
	This is not for us, this isn't a game.
	This is life and death situation.
	And I just wanted to tell you, because gut level, good level, looking at all of it, I said, Nick, and I never called you with drama queen stuff like that.
	I just said, listen, you and Charlie Kirk, I just feel in the ether, both of you guys are at the very top of the future.
	They want to control that future.
	They're worried about your trajectory.
	I didn't say what your trajectory should be.
	I said, I don't know.
	I just said you got a lot of power.
	And I didn't realize how much power I had like 15, 16 years ago or 10 years ago.
	That's why I had the foundations and the agencies coming after me and trying to buy me off and all the rest of it.
	And I didn't realize my reach then.
	So I you you tend to, and I I know this, underestimated it.
	I'm just saying with great power comes great responsibility.
	And I'm not saying what you should do.
	I didn't tell you what you should do.
	I didn't say moderate anything.
	I just said you need to understand you, I said you're not just in the NFL now.
	You're you're on one of the main teams, a quarterback.
	So I'm just saying, you realize now the level you're at, right?
	I do.
	Well, and and obviously, based on what happened to Kirk, I think everybody realizes how serious it is.
	That's when it got real for everybody, for you, me, everybody in this whole thing.
	Uh, whatever is going on, because it's a very confusing time.
	And you're right.
	I mean, you called me up and you said like this, you said these these people are gangsters, man.
	That's what you said.
	You said these people are gangsters.
	This is a dangerous game.
	You said you got a lot of power.
	And uh, and like you said, it is about the future.
	So, you know, you were 100% on the money.
	And it's crazy you said that almost exactly like a week before it happened.
	Um, you know, the timing was very prescient in that way.
	And and obviously things are changing very rapidly.
	I said this on Twitter the other day.
	I said, this is this is the eighth front in Israel's war.
	But we're also in the middle of World War III.
	We're in this war with Ukraine, we're in this war in the Middle East, this multipolar moment.
	You've got the solvency crisis, the sovereign debt crisis with the United States.
	This is one of those world historical inflection points.
	Like in 1917, like in 1945, like in 1989, this is like an historical inflection point.
	And whenever that happens, there's a lot of these forces that intervene to try to control the next phase, the next phase of history.
	I agree.
	You know, it's it's it's 45 and 19, you know, all it's all of it combined in a mega spasm right now.
	I absolutely agree.
	I think you're right.
	It's maybe the biggest one yet.
	And uh, and whenever it's like an earthquake, it's literally tectonic plates shifting.
	And it's that destabilization, which is what causes the kinds of things you're seeing domestically, internationally.
	The whole thing is destabilizing, the whole thing is coming apart, and people are trying to hang on for dear life.
	I think that's one of the reasons that makes it so confusing.
	We're in kind of these days of lead now, Trump getting shot, CEOs getting shot, Charlie Kirk gets shot.
	That by itself should make people ask.
	People coming to your house to kill you?
	I keep bringing that up.
	Don't you love how almost no one defended you when that guy came to kill you and then died in a shootout with police?
	Minutes, let me...
	Yeah, it's it's unbelievable.
	I mean, the way they covered that up, they covered it up the day it happened.
	The media reported it.
	They said Nick Fuentes claims, allegedly, claims it's on video.
	He got shot in my alley by the cops.
	He comes and banged on your door with a gun.
	I'm gonna kill you in a motorcycle element.
	He dies in a shootout with the cops behind your house, and then no one covered it.
	No, well, no one covered it, no one said anything.
	And and you wonder even what was going on with that, because we never even got any answers.
	And I'm I'm glad you bring it up.
	I almost forget about it because it wasn't successful.
	You know, it wasn't a successful attempt.
	So then for that reason, it kind of fades across the display.
	And he's banging on the door saying, Hey Nick, hey Nick.
	And uh, and you're right, nobody covered that at all.
	Well, of course I did.
	Yeah, and I and I appreciated that you did.
	Well yeah, we gotta look out for each other, but but it it should be considered part of this of this trend because that is the disturbing trend line.
	And I feel like a lot of this stuff, they they sort of count on it getting memory hold.
	Trump got shot, then you had another guy come to Mar-a Lago, someone came to my house, Luigi Manjione.
	You also have all these school shootings.
	You also have these school shootings in Wisconsin and Tennessee and the Catholic Church in Minneapolis.
	And all these are extremely strange.
	They're very online people.
	There was a school shooting the same day that Charlie Kirk was killed in Denver, Colorado.
	Some kid obsessed with school shooters, 16 years old, came to school, shot and killed two people.
	We don't even facilities shot up in Texas the last month.
	Exactly right.
	One today, one today.
	Uh, and they shot all illegal immigrants, and then they pull out the bullet casing and they wrote with it with magic marker, blue pen.
	They said anti-ice.
	What was those instructions from the FBI of what to engrave, or did the guy write it himself?
	Oh, this is an anti-ice shooting.
	Let's let's mark it down in pen.
	This is an anti-ICE false flag.
	Like, so something weird is going on here.
	And that's kind of the feeling I just can't shake.
	All the lies, the fake conspiracy theories, the real conspiracy theories, the violence.
	I just can't shake the feeling that something really strange is happening.
	And I I don't even know that we're that we're even approaching understanding what it is.
	That's what kind of scares me.
	Something big and bad is about to happen, and it's all about the old monetary system dying.
	It's all about all these points coming together in a crescendo right now.
	That's right.
	It's it's the confluence of all of these different things.
	You're you're so on the money, no pun intended, with the monetary system, the multipolar moment, Ukraine war, simultaneous with the Israel uh, you know, fighting for power, this Trump government that's been thrust in there.
	Something big is happening, and I agree with you.
	Something big is coming.
	Like it, it's not hard to see.
	This is like when all the birds start flying away and the dogs start barking.
	It's like you see enough of this random acts of violence.
	The worms are coming out of the ground.
	Yeah, it's it this is like running for the hills.
	Like, and I'm not that guy.
	I mean, we've known each other a long time.
	I've never been that guy.
	I can see it.
	I don't know.
	I just said they're coming to kill you, they're coming to kill Charlie Kirk.
	I said, these are gangsters.
	And I just I just out of the ether.
	Gut level, gut level, we got a gut level feeling, but it's it's real.
	I mean, there is a real, I do believe in that.
	There is an instinctual thing about it.
	You know, we remember talking once a month.
	I'm not like drama queening people.
	I don't just call up and say stuff.
	Did I ever ever call you before?
	We've been talking like nine years.
	Did I ever just call them and say something like that before?
	No, never.
	Never.
	Never.
	It was, you know, like you said, it's this is something we're dialed in.
	And I told you I didn't.
	I'm not saying cut and run.
	I said Nick, they're coming.
	You did, and you were right.
	You were right.
	Something's coming.
	I'm with you.
	And I'm worried about the next shoe to drop.
	You know, you see Charlie Kirk continue.
	It's a bunch of big things, and they all feel bad.
	What are they?
	I think there's going to be more political violence.
	That's that's I mean, the most obvious thing is copycasts.
	If this was real, if this was fake, it doesn't matter.
	I mean, it does matter, but it doesn't matter in the sense that other psychos are going to look at this on either side.
	And they're gonna and they're gonna be inscribing stuff in the bullets, and people are gonna be taking shots.
	And you could see it's becoming more frequent.
	We've been talking about this for like the last year and a half.
	You and me, every time we do a discussion, we say Luigi Manjone is a harbringer of things to come.
	There's gonna be left-wing violence, drone attacks, assassinations.
	They're gonna try stuff.
	It's coming.
	And it's increasing in frequency.
	It is by definition a crescendo because it's we're just getting it more at a quicker pace.
	And I think it is building towards maybe something big, maybe a big false flag.
	That's kind of a good thing.
	So let me remember you.
	Let me throw go there, but let me throw this up over here.
	The Modesta plan, cause a race war, trigger all this to drive Trump from all these plans.
	Is the Trump admin doing step to pre-trigger it before to stop their uprising?
	I'm just I'm not saying that's the case, but uh 100% here that this lays the ground to now false flag a traditionally black college, which they close saying Kirk supporters threatened, or the shooting up, as I've been saying, of a bunch of migrants to then be blamed on Trump supporters and trigger the civil war.
	And they go to your point, sorry.
	Yeah, no, absolutely.
	They they are priming the pump.
	I mean, we're sitting on a powder keg for that reason.
	After Charlie Kirk died, it's not all hunky dory.
	Everybody went to that memorial and said, oh, you know, we're choosing faith and forgiveness and all this kind of stuff.
	They don't realize racially, ideologically, religiously, this is like a powder keg situation.
	And all it's gonna take is one nut job, one psycho, an agent provocateur.
	Like you said, is it gonna be an ice thing?
	Is it gonna be a black-white thing with the arena uh Zarutska killing the uh just a week before Charlie Kirk died?
	What it what exactly kind of shape is it going to take?
	On some level, it doesn't matter.
	It has the potential to trigger something extremely volatile.
	And the two things where I was gonna go with it is in May, just before the Iran War started with Israel, you remember the think tank came out and said it's our knee-jerk response to call things the false flag.
	Then after the ice riots, Trump assembles this emergency response National Guard force in the East Coast and on the West Coast, a rapid deployment force in the event of riots.
	You got this National Guard coming to city after city.
	It's like it feels like the storm clouds are rolling in.
	And maybe maybe there's they're anticipating something that the general public is not.
	But I get another hour coming up.
	I want you to be very slow because I forgot about that.
	That's why these brainstorms are good.
	Thank you.
	Didn't they even attack you and others?
	You have these big thinkes coming out tied to Israel saying we've got to pre-demonize anybody that says false flag when these big terror attacks come.
	We've got to be ready to censor for the false flag.
	Remind me of the group because I'm I'm having a seen all moment here.
	Uh, I don't remember the name of it.
	It's an obscure group.
	It's an obscure cutout of it was related to the ADL.
	It's the same group that just kind of, yeah.
	No, it's ADL.
	Yeah, yeah.
	We'll look that up every uh.
	Yeah, they were saying we gotta get ahead of the false flag narrative when that when the attacks come.
	And we were like, that's the pre-programming you and I said on the show two months ago, that's what's telling you is coming.
	We gotta get ahead of false flags when the attacks happen.
	Well, how you're telling us what you're doing here.
	Exactly.
	They yeah, they write in the report.
	Well, hey, if anybody says there's a false flag in two weeks, don't believe them.
	That's not real.
	It's like out there.
	Well, they said we gotta have our censorship bots ready to suppress that.
	Right, right.
	It's like a hunter biden laptop suppression.
	Like, you're gonna suppress us saying it's a false flag ahead of it coming.
	You're telling us.
	Right, right.
	It's predictive programming in that way.
	So I I don't like it.
	I don't like what they're saying in the think tanks.
	I don't like what law enforcement's been saying.
	Stay there.
	Nick J. Fuentes on Rumble on X. And where else should people find your show?
	It's uh week nights usually around 10 o'clock at night.
	Yes.
	Yeah, Monday through Friday, Rumble and X, and uh Telegram.
	I'm on all three.
	All right.
	I'm gonna go to break back in two minutes.
	Uh ladies and gentlemen, they got a bunch of organic brainwashed leftists, outengaged in all sorts of crime and murder.
	That's a fact that's going on.
	But can you piggyback on top of these Discords and six trannies saying he'll be dead tomorrow?
	And then, oh see, we told you.
	Clearly, they had them out there, bare minimum as a cover story to piggyback and killing.
	The question is who did it?
	30 odd six didn't do it.
	I don't think the I don't think the surgeon's lying.
	He was told that's it.
	Told it goes through, goes down, bounces back up.
	They have the bullet.
	Where is it?
	There's not going to be an autopsy.
	They would have said there was an autopsy.
	That right there is a cover-up when you study medical examiners.
	This is a shorter segment, Nick.
	I want to get into Russia and Ukraine.
	You want to, and Trump's horrible statement yesterday.
	And again, I just call balls and strikes.
	That's coming up.
	I'm going to just get into general issues of the country, the world, and you know, things that are happening and how people can prepare themselves for all that's happening, the AI coming out, but but putting bookends on this.
	If they don't release, which I believe that the autopsy was done, we'd have heard about it, and the bullet, then we know there's a cover-up.
	What do you see that doing?
	Because they're going to keep Kirk out there.
	He's super popular.
	The RNC's kind of coming in and taking over.
	And then this is not going to go away.
	This is going to turn into a whole new Epstein thing.
	Yeah, I don't see people letting go.
	I think that people are going to stay on top of this.
	And it's kind of curious because they are going to have their cake and eat it too.
	Uh the GOP is using Charlie Kirk's death with the memorial and everything else to justify their pre-existing agenda.
	I saw J.D. Vance jump in front of it.
	They did this big memorial.
	They're going to use it in the midterm elections.
	They're going to use it for the hate speech or whatever other sort of agenda they have.
	And at the same time, it seems that a significant portion of their base doesn't even believe the narrative and thinks that Charlie Kirk was some sort of martyr for Israel, which of course, rather a martyr against Israel, which of course Israel is deeply in bed with the GOP, which is exploiting the death.
	So it's a very weird kind of triangulation there.
	And uh, it's weird how both of these things seem to be true at the same time.
	It's like they exist in superposition.
	Half the country believes or half the right wing believes it was a left-wing nut job, and that's why we have to crush Antifa and arrest everybody and ban hate speech and ban Jimmy Kimmel.
	And the other half of the base says that he was uh martyr going down for America first against Israel.
	And well, who would be involved in the cover-up?
	It's Cash Patel.
	It's the Trump administration, which is now using it.
	So I wonder how this will reflect in the midterms.
	I wonder how this will express itself in GOP politics in the coming months in the next couple of years.
	And I'm gonna wait and I'm gonna reserve complete judgment until we see the actual trial.
	I wonder if after they pick the jury and they actually hold the trial with the accused.
	I wonder if we're gonna get some answers, but I think that in the meantime, they need to reassure the public and answer some of the basic stuff.
	Who are these out-of-state license plates that were at the at Tyler Robinson's house the day before?
	Where's the exit wound?
	Where's the bullet?
	What's going on with that?
	They need to start providing at least some of these basic answers.
	Otherwise, I don't know how they're ever going to recover.
	I don't know how anyone can trust this administration.
	And you know, not for nothing, but you you pointed out with Epstein.
	It is very interesting how this is the same Department of Justice that put out that memo saying there's no Epstein black book.
	There's no client list, there's nothing to see there.
	This is the same DOJ.
	This is the same FBI that we're supposed to say now.
	They're gonna tell us the truth 100%.
	They don't engage in cover-ups.
	They just got done covering up the previous cover-up with this cover-up.
	So I don't know where we go from here, but I think people need to be very skeptical of what we see coming out of this Trump government in the next few months, especially in the name of Charlie Kirk, because I don't trust in one bit.
	That's what I see coming in the next one.
	Back in 60 seconds with Nick Fuentes.
	Stay with us and share the live feeds from Rumble, the Alpha Show channel.
	Taking down the sacanical globalist New World Order!
	Aaaaaaaaaaaah!
	No!
	Dramatic music Don't use me as a gun.
	Don't use me as a gun.
	bring down the new world Rallying Patriots worldwide in defense of human liberty.
	It's Alex Jones.
	I close my eyes and I wonder why I don't despise.
	Now all I can do is love what was once.
	So life was...
	Well, one of the best parts of seeing the corporate media establishment that's been irrelevant for many years, totally collapse in on itself.
	And to see censorship fails, we get to see all of the amazing minds and ideas.
	And some of what I disagree with it, a lot of it I agree with Nick.
	But but the point is, this is the real animating contest of liberty.
	This is what happens when the stagnation gets shut down.
	And you just get a chance for free thought to happen.
	It is exciting, and people resonate with it.
	Now, Nick, let's talk about this.
	You're, I would say, generally black pill, you can disagree with that.
	I look at things and say on the economy on the border, and previously with war trying to stop it, and standing up to the UNs, getting out of the carbon taxes, RFK Jr. going after all the poison shots, the Tylenol.
	I mean, they're banning the stuff.
	It's it's amazing.
	And I'm on cloud nine saying, Oh, you blackpilled people, you know, you're full of crap.
	And I was thinking of you, and I said, I'm gonna tear into Fuentes tomorrow and say, look how you sit there and you bitch it and you complain about the problems, but you're not cheerleading enough for the good.
	Would you rather Kamala in there?
	And then the last hour of the show, they come in and they go, There's clips of Trump.
	Here's what he said.
	And oh, Ukraine can win, and you can get all your territory back, and this is gonna be great, and we're gonna get all the weapons and to you know, NATO doing a 180.
	And I was like, this is terrible.
	And then I didn't read his true social.
	I just saw it and saw the top, because it said what the news said.
	So that, oh, I was I wasn't lazy, I was busy.
	I didn't read the whole thing.
	There it is on screen, he goes, Oh, you're gonna win.
	It's great.
	Russia's gonna collapse.
	NATO needs to move in, which is Putin's red line.
	And who knows, you'll probably take over Russia.
	When you read that quote about maybe even more, go further than that.
	Zelensky has said we're gonna go into Moscow.
	The head of the EU has said their economic ministers, it's a 20-30-year war.
	It'll be conventional.
	It'll collapse Russia if it takes 20, 30 years, and then we'll divide it up in five parts.
	That's the declaration of war on Russia and NATO.
	We put the maps up since 91, moving all the way around them, moving hypersonic missiles up at their borders, firing them in.
	They can be nuclear-tipped any minute.
	That's what Putin said if you fire five of them at a time, we won't nuke you, but we see hundreds of major aeronautics.
	They we believe it's a nuclear sneak attack, we're gonna hit you.
	So the threat escalation ladder for those that don't study the Rand Corporation and Pentagon War Games and others.
	This is way more dangerous in the Cuban Missile Crisis, previously seen by experts as The worst most dangerous point minutes to midnight.
	We're now 30 seconds to midnight.
	Even the International Atomic Scientist Group says this is a close summer.
	I don't just believe them.
	I am an expert.
	I'm into this since I was a kid.
	I mean, I I had family involved in nuclear weapons and forward and rear.
	And I grew up learning about it.
	And so my dad's uncle ran uh Nike missile batteries in Turkey, and that's why the Russians put uh medium-range uh ballistic missiles into Cuba.
	And that got declassified about 20 years ago.
	I'm like six, seven years old, and I'm sitting there listening to Pat Lynn around the table while they're playing dominoes drinking whiskey at midnight, talking about, you know, this is secret, but uh, you know, you know, he was on record, he was a Nike missile instructor and did all that.
	So I I've set Nehido Grasshopper on this.
	This is so close, ladies and gentlemen.
	And you read this from Trump, this is sickening.
	And I understand it's his art of the deal, and Russia knows NATO's not gonna stop, so Russia's winning, got all these cities and towns.
	They don't want the whole thing.
	They want a buffer zone.
	So but now NATO wants to go in.
	Now Trump's backing NATO with a quarter million man and woman army, conscriptions being brought back, including women.
	I mean, this doesn't smell of Armageddon.
	This is Armageddon.
	Remember two years ago, Biden, we can't send an F-16s and Abrams.
	That goes up the escalation ladder to World War III.
	We're way past that now.
	So we're about to see a new operation spiderweb, 4,000 miles into Russia, blowing up their bombers.
	I mean, this is not flirting.
	This is asking for nuclear war, Nick.
	So I literally, I was gonna finally I'll really, you know, people want to fight and it look good, and I think Nick's wrong.
	And I was like, I was like, I was like, oh, this is a celebration, and damn it, look what we're doing.
	And all that good Trump's doing doesn't matter if he acts like this.
	What the hell is this, Nick?
	It's unbelievable.
	He he actually said they're gonna retake all the territory, which is a complete reversal.
	I mean, to your credit, it was defensible, I think, maybe right up until the middle of August, when Trump and Putin had that meeting in Alaska, and it seemed that there might have been some possibility of a peace agreement or a ceasefire or something like that.
	And at that meeting in August, Trump said Ukraine may have to give up some territory.
	Like it looked like, and by the way, that was their position this entire year.
	The entire year for the past nine months of the Trump administration.
	They were trying to compel Ukraine and Europe to give up territorial concessions.
	In other words, to freeze the battle line, let Russia have the Donbass, let them have Zaporizhia, let them have uh Kharkiv, and and we were just gonna call it quits and say stop the killing.
	That was the position of the State Department.
	That was the position of the White House.
	And now all the time.
	Stop criticizing Trump.
	He's cutting off the weapons, he's making him do a deal.
	But now he just blew all that up.
	It's a complete reversal.
	It's a complete 180.
	And now he's saying the exact opposite of what he's been saying the whole year, which is gone from what five months ago publicly spanging Zelensky in the Oval Office to, I'm sorry, giving him a blowjob on television.
	Yeah, and people forget about that.
	But I mean, he did literally drag Zelensky in there.
	Oh, wow, thanks for dressing up.
	I have all the cards.
	How dare you?
	And now he has one meeting with him at the General Assembly the other day and says, we're gonna help you get back all the territory.
	How is that gonna happen?
	Ukraine has no soldiers.
	They can't get people to show up.
	You got a hundred thousand deserters.
	The front line is is like Swiss cheese.
	They have drones and maybe in some places two or three people defending miles and miles of the front line, and they're saying now they're gonna fight back for every inch, every square mile of Russian territory.
	How's that even gonna happen?
	And what went under the radar, by the way, not only did Trump say, excuse me, that we're gonna take back all the territory and we're gonna push Russia back, but he also said in the press conference that NATO countries should shoot down Russian jets.
	Did you catch that?
	There's been these alleged violations of Polish and Estonian airspace by uh what they say are Russian drones and by Russian jets.
	And so there's been this invocation of Article 4 of NATO, where they have this consultation about the security Threat.
	They say that there were drones coming into Poland.
	We didn't know if they're decoys.
	Were they launched from Ukraine, Belarus?
	What even are they?
	And Estonia done Trump.
	Trump is doing uh submarine nuke launched uh uh test for the Russians.
	U.S. Navy carried out four missile tests, unarmed Trident II D5 LE missiles that carry hydrogen bombs, launched from nuclear capable Ohio class sub off the east coast of Florida, estimated range 8,500 kilometers.
	This is bad.
	And this is after they parked two submarines on either side of the Russian coast when they're threatening nuclear war last month.
	It's horrible.
	And I I think this administration, the deep state, they want a hot war with Russia.
	That's obviously where this is going.
	They recognize that Russia is winning.
	Russia is unstoppable.
	They're going to break the Ukrainian line.
	That is inevitable because Ukraine just doesn't have the manpower.
	So that's the bad feeling, first and foremost, we're feeling.
	It's hiding in plain view.
	We are barreling into total war.
	We're we're barreling into a hot war with Russia where the United States and NATO are shooting at the Russians because they know that's the only way to stop them.
	And what does that look like?
	This is going to be the first great power conflict, nuclear conflict between nuclear armed states since the invention of nuclear weapons.
	I don't think anyone has any idea how or where this is going to go or how quickly.
	And of course, this is happening simultaneously with every other war that we're getting into.
	Regime change in Venezuela, regime change in Iran.
	Now this.
	So we were promised no new wars.
	That was the whole premise last year.
	We were promised that you know the Ukraine war was an anomaly because of Biden's mental health and that it was the people around him, the State Department, the National Endowment for Democracy pushing the stuff.
	Now it seems like Trump is literally just picking up where Biden left off.
	This is carrying on, and it's it's maybe even worse.
	What do you think the change was?
	What do you think the change was?
	I think that Trump legitimately thought that he could bring the war to an end.
	And I think maybe on some level the State Department welcomed Trump in because it let them change their demands.
	Because under the Biden administration, they said, we're gonna take back everything.
	Russia's a war criminal, et cetera.
	And I think they let Trump come in because Trump's message was more conciliatory.
	Trump said, well, we'll let you keep what you have.
	Let's just stop the war.
	And so it was a different appeal and different demands.
	And Putin was not going for that because Putin doesn't trust us.
	He knows that the second there's a ceasefire, we're just gonna load up Ukraine with weapons.
	They're gonna, they're gonna fortify the front line, and the war is gonna start again.
	So Putin wasn't going for it.
	I think now they realize there's just no way that Russia's gonna stop.
	The Ukraine can't stop them.
	They won't agree to stop.
	No, no, you're just now they got right.
	Because Russia knows it's all about NATO, and now Trump said, yeah, NATO should come in and basically take over.
	That's the red line.
	So Russia's not blinking.
	And so now I guess Trump says, hey, he said good luck, though.
	Like, oh, you're gonna take over Russia.
	Maybe it's sarcasm.
	Yeah, Zelensky, you're really great.
	You're gonna win.
	We'll sell you weapons, but goodbye, have fun in your war.
	Then we should leave NATO so we don't get nuked in this.
	Right.
	And I don't like the glibness.
	You know, good law.
	That's sort of the problem.
	We don't even really know where he stands on this.
	We're not actually getting say what you will about the Biden administration.
	We knew the white paper.
	We knew the official policy of the U.S. government.
	To an extent, you can say that what Trump is doing is gunboat diplomacy, like you said, art of the deal.
	It's all negotiating.
	They're playing games with nuclear war.
	I don't like that.
	It's one thing when you're doing brinksmanship with North Korea.
	It's a totally different thing when you're doing whatever this is with Russia.
	So I think that's a good thing.
	You know, they got 50 submarines off our coast.
	By the way, but Trump said I've sent two.
	We got like 30 subs off the coast, but maybe more.
	But yeah, the point is he told them I got subs ready to nuke you.
	The subs are all with the triggers off, aimed at each other forever.
	I mean, it's just it's insane.
	You got Lindsey Graham literally having orgasms on TV that now we're about to bomb Russia, now we're giving the heavy weapons to them.
	We'll get to that in a moment.
	I mean, this is cuckoo town.
	It is, and this is just not what anybody voted for.
	I I, of course, didn't vote for Trump.
	I didn't vote for this because I sort of saw this coming.
	But look, the people that vote for Trump do the Iran thing, but did you think he'd do this on Russia?
	I didn't.
	I no, not to this extent.
	I said in December, I said, I think people are gonna be surprised that Trump will have to escalate before even attempting to de-escalate.
	I said, there's no way Trump is going to accept a loss right out of the gate, but I had no idea they were going to push it this far.
	This is more extreme than Biden.
	And it's deja vu all over again because, you know, you remember in the first term, Obama really started this with Euro Maydan in 2014, and they supported Ukraine against the secession, the Donbass war before Russia got directly involved or officially involved.
	When Trump got in in the first term, he was sending Ukraine lethal aid.
	He was arming Ukraine and Ukraine was buying drones and they were getting actual weapons from America.
	It's like Daniel, he sent them tens of thousands of thousands, tens of thousands of low tech thousands of uh anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.
	Exactly.
	So that he escalated from Obama in the first term, and now he's escalating from Biden in the second term.
	And yeah, nobody voted for nuclear war.
	Nobody voted for war with Russia.
	And this was maybe like one of the big things, if not the biggest thing next to immigration, why we needed Trump in some sense.
	I know there were it was very contentio whether to support Trump or not for me on my show.
	I would say at the minimum, the two reasons that you would make the case to vote for him that were undeniable were the war in Ukraine and immigration.
	And there's maybe an argument to be made about immigration, but this is just a catastrophe of epic proportion.
	Well, expand on that.
	I think you nailed that, and that's what I've been thinking.
	Let's just put you know, clear, clear touch to this.
	Trump literally thought he could end this.
	He thought Russia would make a deal.
	Russia knows it's winning, plus they don't trust NATO.
	There's a bunch of double dealing.
	And so he will not feel like he's lost.
	So if Russia won't do the deal he wants, then he's gonna give Europe what they want at Green Line for war.
	Also he can be the King Kong gorilla, and that is stupid.
	It is stupid.
	It's it's reckless.
	It's reckless and it's dangerous, and you know, we didn't vote for this.
	And, you know, he said last year, I'm gonna have it solved in 24 hours.
	That was the promise.
	He said, I'll have it solved before I even get inaugurated, between the election and the inauguration.
	And you're exactly right.
	He came in thinking that it was going to be art of the deal.
	You know, when Obama said, What magic wand do you have?
	You know, Trump thought he was gonna wave the wand, the war would be over.
	And on some level, there is an element of ego in this.
	I think I think he kind of said that in what you just said a moment ago.
	Trump knows that if he cut the deal that Putin is willing to make, then this is going to be a loss.
	This is gonna cut, this is gonna be called out on the ledger as a loss for America, as a loss for Trump.
	And I think there's something about him he's unwilling to accept that.
	Because the what you would do if you wanted to end the war is cut the aid to Ukraine.
	You can't, Ukraine can't fight this war alone, and Europe can't fight the war on behalf of Ukraine.
	Pull out a NATO.
	Exactly.
	Pull us out, because Ukraine knows, and Europe knows too, they can only play these games when they can count on America to come in and bail them out.
	Europe and Ukraine combined cannot fight Russia.
	So all this big talk, all them, you know, assembling at the White House and demanding that Trump give security guarantees.
	That is with the expectation that we will bail them out if if shit hits the fan, you know, if if things go out of control.
	So if you want to tend the war, you cut off Ukraine, you pull out of NATO.
	Good luck.
	You know, that's good luck.
	And then Ukraine is forced to deal on Russia's terms.
	Then they have to agree to give up what they've lost.
	Then they have to agree to whatever Russia demands, and you get an end to the war.
	But Trump doesn't want to call it a loss.
	But I want to explain something.
	War is the most studied thing there is in history.
	Okay, maybe other than medicine.
	There's a threat escalation ladder.
	The Chinese study it, the Russians, the French, the U.S., all their war games are the same.
	Now they have AI.
	This all leads a nuclear war if people keep escalating and don't make a deal with all these weapons.
	Lindsey Graham knows that and now says we're going to total war and starts biting his lip like he's having an orgasm.
	This is satanic.
	This is the ghost of John McCain.
	This, this, this is crazy.
	And it's not part of the deal.
	You can do that in business.
	War is when business is broken down and all the other means have failed.
	And so, I mean, I'm ready to get on an airplane.
	I could beat with Trump if I wanted to, but not if he hears I want to disagree.
	If he wants to pat me on the head, I can go have dinner with him.
	But I mean, I'm ready to go bullhorn the White House over this.
	I mean, this is insane.
	And I love all the good stuff he's doing, but we have a nuclear war, none of that matters.
	Here's Lindsey Graham literally having orgasms on television as he prepares to start Armageddon.
	Trump 2028.
	I hope this never ends.
	When he asks, what should you do if a Russian jet flies into your country?
	Shoot it down.
	He's tried to go out of his way to get Putin to the table.
	We don't want to humiliate Russia.
	We just want to end the war.
	And to our friends in Russia, here's what Trump did today.
	He told uh NATO, I'll show you all the weapons you want.
	You can provide them to Ukraine.
	And as to Ukraine, you can use them any way you want.
	So to the Russian military, you're gonna be up against the high-end American weapons that will be sold to NATO for the benefit of Ukraine.
	And this war is uh coming to your backyard here with no limitations like Biden.
	So four years ago, before the escalation happened, the official war was already happening.
	Putin said, if you sell long-range heavy weapons, any country selling them will be seen as an enemy, we'll be targeted, which is legitimate.
	I mean, if Russia was selling Mexico, 2,000 pound uh hypersonic cruise missiles, we would blame Russia.
	So this is Graham literally going, we're going to war with Russia, we're gonna cross the red line, biting his lip.
	What do you say to that, Nick Fuentes?
	I mean, this that is a literal demon right there.
	It is, it's satanic.
	How else could you watch that clip and think anything else?
	This is obviously some kind of blackmailed Manchurian candidate for the deep state.
	That's what he has always been.
	That's what John McCain was.
	That's what a lot of these people are.
	He's on television.
	And even the way he says it, I hope this never ends.
	Hope what never ends?
	The killing, the bloodshed, thousands of people dying every day.
	And it's a very good thing.
	Ukrainians die and and we just make money.
	It it gives echoes of Hillary Clinton.
	It's kind of like the same maniacal cackling, you know, he came, we came, we saw, he died.
	Haha, you know, what what difference does it make?
	It's like the same vibes.
	Like these people worship death and destruction, they worship annihilation.
	And this goes on forever.
	Where do you think it's gonna go?
	It doesn't, like you said, with the escalation ladder, it doesn't continue at this at a low boil forever, at a kind of a contained low boil conflict forever.
	Eventually, it does escalate.
	Ukraine unleashes attacks on Russian soil like they did in Operation Spiderweb, attacking strategic aircraft.
	Then what do you think Russia does?
	Well, they're gonna start to attack the people providing the weapons for Ukraine.
	And then what are we doing?
	If Putin doesn't do that, all the analysts agree the hardliners will remove him.
	Right, right.
	We'll get something worse.
	So for all these fantasies about removing Putin from power or waiting for him to die or toppling his regime.
	What do you think you're gonna get next?
	You're gonna get somebody far worse and far more extreme.
	That's almost always the case anywhere, any conflict you're talking about.
	So, you know, we want this actually to stop immediately as opposed to go on.
	And Gallup has gone and done internal polls in Russia, very accurate.
	This war had like 82% approval.
	It's over 90.
	The Russians want war now.
	They're pissed off.
	And they love Putin.
	They approve of the war and they love Putin.
	They see this as an existential battle, which it is.
	It is an existential battle, and it is a battle for this opportunity.
	Americans would be screaming for fighting.
	Well, and and that just that kind of analogy, it just shows you how ridiculous the whole thing is.
	Ukraine shares a border with Russia.
	We want to be doing military exercises on their border.
	We want to deprive them of their ports.
	What happens if Russia takes over Guantanamo Bay in Mexico?
	Would we allow that?
	Would we allow Russian long-range missiles in Mexico City?
	Obviously not.
	And yet, this is literally, we're fighting for nuclear war for our right to do that.
	And I think that there's just no reason for it.
	I mean, we're clearly in a uh inflection point.
	Uh I mean, is he just doing art of the deal stuff, or is he, or is he compromised?
	I believe he is still doing art of the deal on some level.
	I I think it's his own sick way.
	Because you understand that Trump, he really just has these two modes, which is conciliatory and then the maximalist demands.
	So in his, in his juvenile mind and this kind of art of the deal mind, he's saying, okay, well, Putin, we rolled out the red carpet.
	We showed you Mr. Nice Guy.
	We talked about comprehensive cooperation on other matters like the Arctic or whatever.
	You don't want to play ball.
	Okay, fine.
	Now we'll shoot down jets.
	Now we'll put extraordinary pressure on you.
	Now we're going to get behind Europe and Ukraine.
	I guess we have to wait and see is is there going to be a policy change?
	Is there going to be anything meaningful?
	Because he backed down from putting these extreme sanctions on India for buying Russian oil.
	We have to see if there's actually going to be any kind of meaningful change in policy.
	Because it could be all talk.
	Trump is all talk.
	He always chickens out with China, with Terrorist, with the National Guard in Chicago.
	I mean, you name it, everything that you can do.
	Exactly, but he's chickening out on the dumbass commie mayor and the and the Democrat governor.
	This is the biggest nuclear power, and the Russians are taking this seriously.
	You know, they're having the same discussions, but you just, you don't, you don't play around with this.
	It's very reckless.
	And I will say it, those statements by Trump were incompetent.
	It isn't competence.
	And it's my life and our planet's life.
	So Trump better reverse this right now.
	I'm going to start going on the war pack.
	Jesus Christ.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	All right, I want to plug the kids on this.
	Sleepwalking into thermal nuclear hellfire and then move into some other issues of Nick Fuentes' amazing interview today, very thought-provoking.
	I appreciate him being here.
	Find everything at Dick J. Fuentez on Rumble and more there for his nightly show.
	There's a normalcy bias in people that don't study history.
	You can learn through experience, instruction, or revelation.
	The best way is obviously revelation.
	But the most common, obviously, it would be experience.
	People don't tend to listen to instruction as much as they listen to actually, you know, don't stick your finger in the light socket or whatever.
	But there's a normalcy bias that everything's fine, everything's just gonna go on the way it's gone.
	When you study 90% of people not being self-sufficient, being urban, there's a collapse, it's World War Z. It's not like the Great Depression.
	It's a thousand times worse.
	I mean, just all the Pentagon studies are dead on cannibalism within five, six days, total collapse at 15.
	You think army ants can eat the jungle, you know, in Brazil down to nothing.
	This will make army ants look like a walk of the park.
	You got that.
	You got the globalists trying to collapse stuff, believing they can manage a collapse for control, even more insane.
	That's being repudiated by Trump.
	That's good in real action, not just rhetoric.
	Then you got him flirting with nuclear war.
	Everybody's saying, Oh, there'll never be a nuclear war because there hasn't been a nuclear war.
	And but then all the real studies, and I've done the research, I know they're right.
	We are so close.
	So people better pray.
	And everybody being victims and bitching and husbands and wives fighting and all this stupid crap is going to evaporate instantly and this stuff kicks off.
	And it goes from bad to worse.
	You got Trump basically taking over the Federal Reserve.
	That's a huge victory.
	I mean, it's so paradoxical, but the nuclear war card, or just say full conventional war with Russia, which they believe they'll never go to nukes, they're gonna win that.
	The Chicoms are involved.
	A hundred thousand extra North Koreans just came in.
	This is a new world war.
	We're in a new world war, and it's hard to cover any other issue when this is happening, and I don't just do issues for viewers, but there's a paradox.
	I cover nothing but important stuff, but sometimes I'll cover stuff that isn't as important, but it's because you're what you want, just so at the end can say something important about stopping nuclear war.
	You understand?
	So I don't know how we get people that don't understand how much danger we're in, and how the globalists believe they can get rid of the population and emerge with all this AI after this cataclysm, this cleansing.
	That's really their plan.
	It's not just in Dr. Strangelove.
	There was a Pentagon plan with Curtis LeMay and L. L. Limnitzer that was declassified later.
	Um Kubrick was warned about it, made a movie about it.
	They investigated him how he knew that was that it's basically a documentary.
	Show those crazies were the ones that train the neocons today.
	And Israel's got a Samshenobson, too.
	So they don't just want mutually assured destruction to stop war.
	They want destruction.
	Uh Deng Xiaoping said, you know, 30 years ago, oh, we're the only country in the world that wants a nuclear war.
	Our problem is too big a population.
	So China has said an official doctrine, we want a nuclear war because we want to get rid of our population.
	We have, I mean, so this is very complex.
	And people that don't study it, I talk to them and they're and they're like vegetables.
	And I'm not on a power trip, like I know all this.
	You don't, I am upset that people don't understand this, Nick.
	So, in closing on that point, it's some other stuff on the first amendment.
	Well, why is that important?
	Well, if we don't have that, we can't stop these wars.
	At least when Bondy floated ADL banning on the First Amendment last week, they reversed in five hours because at least we can move the needle with Trump, which is something I see as positive.
	So we'll we'll hit that in a moment.
	Uh, but uh I'm I'm ranting.
	Just put a book in on it.
	Well, I'm the sad thing is I don't think there's too much that anybody can do.
	I think that these are forces beyond our control, powerful forces.
	Uh, the administration knows there's no appetite for this.
	They know what they promised.
	They know they said no new wars and we'll end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours.
	They know it's unpopular.
	Uh at this point, it is just these reciprocal escalations, reciprocal actions were were sort of trapped.
	You know, when they talk about the inevitable conflict between China and America, they compare it to the Thucydides trap.
	That's the model they use.
	It's called the trap because it's sort of unavoidable.
	It's this like we're we're between a rock and a hard place here, and it's impossible to navigate.
	So I think we just have to, on some level, us ordinary people, regular people have to pray for a peaceful solution because I think it's a lot more likely it's going to end in war than that it's going to end peacefully.
	Uh, so I'm I'm disappointed, but it it goes to show when it comes to the GOP, the Trump administration, you know, you know, earlier you characterized me as blackpilled.
	I wouldn't say I'm blackpilled as much as I am so cynical of any offering from the major parties.
	I'm cynical and and I am extremely skeptical of the offerings from the Democrats, equally the Republicans.
	They say things, they promise things, they never do them, never ever.
	And they said that they would end this war.
	That didn't smash, that didn't pass the smell test.
	It's not coming to fruition.
	Um, and that's why I say, on some level, the only vote that we can exercise is a rejection.
	You think that we have choice, Republican or Democrat, right or left.
	We get the same thing no matter what.
	We vote for the war party, the deep state no matter what.
	I think the only vote is a non-participation, a rejection.
	That's kind of been what I've what I've been on for the longest time.
	In retrospect, we almost did everything right.
	Trump ran in 16 as the anti-war candidate, non-intervention.
	You had him on your show.
	I volunteered for his campaign.
	We believed in it.
	And on the other side of a decade since that has happened, we've only gotten more entrenched, more regime change, more war.
	The Middle East is blown up.
	We're going back in.
	We're at war with Russia.
	It just goes to show even what is presented as a radical outsider and someone who's truly against the status quo, gets rapidly assimilated and accepts the status quo and carries it on even further.
	That's why I say we it's almost a repudiation of the system.
	I'm always calling for a kind of a more radical break from the past, uh, because everything short of that radical break seems to always just tend towards the same direction, which is nuclear war.
	So it's terrifying.
	And people need to realize this is reality.
	I like what you said that it's the most important thing in the world, and maybe people are less interested.
	I don't think people realize the normalcy bias is so real, too.
	People have never seen nuclear war in their lifetimes.
	People have only seen the good times.
	Even the wars that we're in, they're not total wars, they're not full wartime mobilization.
	They think it's always going to be that way on some level.
	They expect it will always be like that.
	There's no reason to believe that's the case when you really look at the facts.
	So this is a real threat.
	We are really in danger here.
	We are in peril and I don't know what's going on.
	So you're smart, you're entertaining, you're funny, but people really listen to you because you're prescient.
	You've made a lot of predictions that have come true, basically all of them.
	I have too.
	And I don't say it on a power trip, but the reason the bad guys want us off the air, they've said this is because we can change narratives.
	I want to get the public to understand this.
	They can realize their power at agency to change this together because I legitimately, and all the war games show it.
	It's not just me, it's the top war gaming private companies of government admit this.
	But this is a psychology of people like Lindsey Graham and others.
	They're the worst example of it.
	You know, the mini-me of John McCain.
	They all get together with their own normalcy bias, and they've they're on a power trip with all these weapons and stuff.
	And they've talked about they've got bunkers and they'll re-emerge and all the rest of it.
	It's the same as globalists want to crash the economy for control of the population.
	Now they realize, oh, we'll never get away with it.
	Let's not do it now.
	It's a bunch of wimps.
	Because the real soldiers I know, and the really smart people, they're all trying to stop this.
	High level, low-level, mid-level.
	But it literally is the people like Lindsey Graham that are demonically possessed that get off on flirting with this, and they need to be restrained.
	We Russia didn't start this.
	Russia's not perfect.
	And so I just, I just don't know how to explain to people that think, well, I don't want a nuclear war, so there isn't gonna be one.
	Well, you're not, you're not Lindsey Graham.
	God knows what's on his hard drive.
	I mean, these are really sick people.
	And when you're that sick, the final degeneracy is total war.
	That's right.
	That's absolutely right.
	And you know, what we want out of this is just a negotiated settlement.
	Uh, there is a, like you said, it's uh it is a great turning, a mega turning.
	The world is going through a convulsion, and rightfully so.
	When Putin talks about the war, he talks about root causes.
	That's always the phrase that crops up.
	That's the rhetoric they're using.
	And what does he mean when he says root causes of the conflict?
	It means there's a real disagreement here between Russia and the United States that's being fought out and battled over.
	And what is this thing about attacking Russia, Napoleon, Hitler, all of them?
	Why do they do it?
	It might be there's something um perennial there, you know.
	I and I tend not to go in that direction, the eschatology stuff.
	But when you when you think about the end times prophecy and you think about these major world powers that are going to come together for a war, who knows?
	Maybe maybe there is something animating that because you know it's been variously described in different prophecies that that Napoleon and Hitler are two antichrists.
	That's sort of interesting.
	They both made that move, and they say there might be a third anti-Christ will invade Russia again.
	Of course, Russia's doing this in many ways.
	They're their geopolitical thinking, their geostrategic thinking, it proceeds from those invasions.
	Why can NATO not control Ukraine?
	Because that is the superhighway on which Western Europe has invaded Russia.
	25% of Russians killed in World War II.
	I mean, imagine that race memory.
	Right.
	Well, and that's imminent for them.
	That that was in the last century that 10 million people perished in that war.
	Uh, we can't even fathom something like that.
	The last time we had a loss of that magnitude was the civil war.
	And in terms of absolute numbers, it didn't even approach what happened in Russia and World War II.
	So uh, this is what informs their thinking.
	The Nazis wrote letters and intelligence reports we classified.
	They'd fought a bunch of people.
	Once they started fighting the Russians, and the Germans are tough, they were like, these people are scary.
	So they're brutal.
	They're absolutely brutal, and they're fighters, and and the Russian spirit is one of sacrifice.
	We don't even understand the animal we're dealing with here.
	When when you look at Dostoevsky, when you look at the Russian writers, the spirit of the Russian nation, it's literally suffering.
	Like that's what that's what communism was.
	It is self-sacrificial suffering.
	And so the idea that the United States, with all of the decadence that we have, that we're gonna come in and fight for their borderland, their hinterland, when they fought the Muslims and the Huns for a thousand years.
	If they fought them 20 years ago, the Chechens, and the brutality is just unbelievable over there.
	They're a brutal people.
	And on some Level, it's there's got to be a requiem for what Trump promised 10 years ago.
	Don't you miss the days when Trump said, what if Russia could be our friend?
	That we were talking about a comprehensive cooperation with Russia on various matters.
	There's a there's another timeline where maybe that was fleshed out, but it just never happened.
	Now we're staring down the barrel of the gun.
	And why?
	Just let him have Ukraine.
	And I I'm not even, I'm not pro-Russia, I'm pro-America.
	But it's clear Russia is re-emerging after the fall of the Soviet Union.
	They only want a buffer zone.
	So in closing, we're almost out of time.
	You got to come back sooner.
	But that's you on all the time.
	Um, I get bullied and threatened.
	You better not have him back on.
	Great discussions.
	We don't have the first minute, we have nothing.
	So on the heels of Bondi, endorsing the ADL repeal of the First Amendment last week and us slapping it down.
	We have Jim Jordan yesterday.
	Due to our oversight efforts, Google commits to offer all creators previously kicked off YouTube to the political speech violations to return to the platform.
	But that's not all.
	We have the Alphabet Letter, that's the parent company, Eric Schmidt, saying, Yeah, we're gonna stop.
	So I'm a little busy, but I told you during a break.
	You should go try to relaunch your channel.
	And I'm doing it today.
	I'm gonna get in there with my driver's license, all of it, and I'm gonna try to relaunch an Alex Show channel today.
	And the crew's like, well, let's worry about the algorithm.
	What do we're not gonna get on there?
	I predict they're gonna block it, which is fine.
	Then I'll get it to Jim Jordan, who I can call on the phone, leave it right there.
	This is just department investigation.
	And we're gonna force their hand on this.
	But but this does show some of the good stuff coming out of Trump, other than trying to start a nuclear war.
	What do you make of that?
	Well, I'm skeptical of it like you are, because then they came out actually, I don't know if it was today or yesterday, and YouTube said it's a pilot program.
	I don't know if you this is brand new.
	I think it just came out of the room.
	Yeah.
	So I'm deeply skeptical.
	And you know, that could mean one of two things.
	It might mean that they will do more later.
	That's what a pilot program is.
	They'll see how it goes.
	Maybe they'll bring on more people.
	Or it could mean that it's like a token um concession, and it's not actually what we're saying in a day.
	You know, big big creators, big talk show hosts.
	I'll stop there.
	They call him up and say, Oh, we hear Evan Alex on.
	The producers all talk to him or all telltales.
	Better not do that.
	We're gonna demonetize you.
	So that's what goes on.
	But it's not like, oh, I went back on YouTube.
	But clearly, will you because I'm not trying to hog the space here?
	It's a smart, not a stunt, it's to show it.
	Let's commit.
	You and I both today.
	Let's go try to log on.
	Let's try to relaunch the Nick J. Fuentes show, America First.
	Let's try to relaunch Alex Jones Live.
	Let's do it when we get off here in 10 minutes.
	Let's do it.
	Absolutely.
	I'm game.
	Yeah, let's stress test it.
	Yeah, because it's horse crap.
	I totally agree with you.
	I I don't know.
	Here's what I will say about YouTube.
	I am skeptical because you and I, we've been through a lot of the same nonsense that they always do like this.
	But at least from my perspective, there were times when I, years ago, I would go on somebody's channel and they would get banned.
	That has not happened as far as I'm aware, at least in seven months.
	The last year, say almost a year, I'm able to go on shows, they don't get banned or demonetized.
	Yeah.
	And suddenly my clips are everywhere too.
	Yeah, same here.
	So I there definitely is a liberalization.
	They're definitely opening it up.
	The question is just how far are they gonna take it?
	I'm skeptical that you and me are gonna be allowed, right?
	Because the holy spirit, the end of the day, gut level is your own knowledge, your instincts, your your life experience, but also the Holy Spirit.
	I just think Elon Musk is good.
	He got mad at Trump and left and he he put it all in the line.
	He's been majorly attacked.
	Uh I mean, on X, we've done nothing but support.
	I I mean, I think I don't think I know.
	Elon doing what he did opened up all of this.
	I agree with you.
	It's he probably did more good on net than maybe almost anybody else, up to and including Trump on some level.
	And Trump's treatment, I know the inside baseball, a bunch of jealous people ran Elon out and totally it was a bad move.
	I believe that.
	Elon is not a politician.
	He's a businessman, he's a technologist, and you know how politics are.
	all these jealous, petty people trying to cut each other and kill each other to get a position.
	And he's OCD obsessed with results.
	He said it.
	He said, the best base from operations is America, I want to save it.
	He's He's not trying to steal your Social Security check like they said it's the opposite.
	He's trying to stabilize it so he has a place to have wealth.
	It's purely selfish in a good way.
	It's like good greed.
	Well, yeah, and insofar as he's in favor of free speech, I think that is the best thing that can be done because that's what's going to save the country is people like us being able to express ourselves and prevent the kind of really dark stuff that we saw a few years ago when censorship was out of control.
	So I agree.
	I mean, it cannot be overstated how big of a deal it is that he opened up the floodgates for all this when he bought Twitter.
	I never thought I'd see the day when when Gabby McGuinness who was on your show the other day, you, me, we'd all be right back.
	And he even said about you, I well, Alex can't come back.
	And then he brought you back, and then he brought me back.
	And then, you know, Gavin came back the other day.
	It was almost miraculous because up until that point, it was not just a censorship, it was Kafka-esque.
	It was like, you know, you try to file it.
	And then he came on the show for like we did a couple interviews.
	But I said, You understand I wasn't banned for Sandy Hook.
	And he's like, Really?
	And I said, he went to the logs.
	He goes, Oh my God, you never even talked about it.
	You were banned for saying when Antifa comes to your house, defend yourself.
	He went, Whoa, I was lied to.
	That's yeah, PR firm.
	I told the PR firm he was, oh, it was a PR firm attacking him, and then it was like light bulb.
	Hmm.
	Well, that's a testament then to his integrity, then.
	If he was under one impression, found out the information and made the correction, then.
	Oh, you read the headlines.
	I'm being mean to dead kids.
	I pee on graves.
	None of it's true.
	So let me show you these clips in closing.
	Uh Kamala says Trump's a communist dictator.
	How pathetic.
	And then we got Hillary saying white men are the problem.
	This is their total divide and conquer.
	This is all they've got left.
	Where does the Democratic Party go now with record low fundraising, record low ratings?
	What do they do?
	Here it is.
	A tyrant.
	We used to compare the strength of our democracy to common communist dictators.
	That's what we're dealing with right now in Donald Trump.
	And these titans of industry are not speaking up.
	And I am proud of the fact that we have always been a work in progress.
	You know, we haven't gotten to the more perfect union.
	And we fought a civil war over part of it.
	And people have been protesting, you know, for hundreds of years that, you know, things were not as they should be, given our ideals and how we should be uh uh moving toward them.
	So I think that's what makes us so special as a country.
	And the idea that you could turn the clock back and try to recreate a world that never was dominated by, you know, let's say it, white men uh of a certain persuasion, uh a certain religion, uh a certain point of view, a certain ideology.
	It's just doing such damage to what we should be aiming for.
	And we were on the path toward that.
	I mean, imperfectly, lots of you know, bumps along the way, but I agree with you.
	We were on the right trajectory.
	So literal demonization of whites, Christians, and Catholics, these are Satanists.
	Nick, how do you respond to that scumbaggery?
	That is so shocking to me.
	It's just so out of touch.
	I thought we were beyond that rhetoric.
	I thought even the Democrats were beyond that on some level, even just strategically.
	No one can look at you with rhetoric half as strong as theirs.
	We need to stop being cucked.
	That's why you're that's why what you're doing is good.
	This is a race.
	This is an anti-white, anti-Christian piece of filth and trying to organize and uh non-whites to hate us.
	It's bullshit.
	That's exactly.
	How else could you interpret it?
	She says, though, all of history is run by white Christian men.
	That's your time is over.
	You're finished.
	Who's gonna run our country then?
	Immigrants, who's gonna run our country?
	Foreigners?
	And and how should that happen?
	I'm proud of everybody.
	Everybody has skills.
	God made us all.
	But why do people want to be in Western cultures?
	Why the architecture?
	Why the science?
	I mean, what what is it about white people?
	And why does the ADL and those groups want to remove that genius so they can rule a bunch of idiots?
	This is part of their just they just hate us.
	I mean, on some level, they just hate us.
	When people say things like that, well, it's time for white men to step aside.
	I mean, there is nothing behind that other than pure racism.
	That's racial hatred for white men.
	And that's always what it's pure envy.
	So what is it they hate?
	Uh I, you know, with her, she's a woman.
	So I who knows what's behind that?
	She's a white woman herself.
	It's very Disgusting daughter of a mob boss.
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	She and she looks terrible in that clip.
	Um, with her, I don't know what it is.
	She's a complicated person, but with a lot of these people, it is a malicious hatred because we are creators.
	We generate, we create.
	When you look at Western civilization, when you look at Europe, it's synonymous with wealth, progress, industry, productivity, technology, stuff that they don't have, stuff that arguably maybe they never could have.
	Things that they don't have in their countries, and they come here with all this stuff.
	They're scared of innovation.
	I would say they're they're more just jealous of the wealth.
	I don't think they they're not innovators themselves.
	I don't think they think in those terms.
	I think it's literally purely they look at the squire they live in.
	I admire innovators whoever they are.
	I uh you know why are they threatened by by beauty?
	Because they can't control it.
	They don't have it, they can't control it, they don't have it in their countries.
	And so it's sort of like if we can't have it, then no one can.
	You know, they they want to be the masters of it.
	If they can't have it, then they want to bring it all down.
	I think on some level that's just for this.
	Yes, it's that anti-colonial stuff at all costs.
	But something you said, why are they still on this point destroying him?
	Because it's who they are.
	They can't stop.
	Well, that's a perfect way to bring it home because it's true.
	I mean, this is hurting them.
	You'd you think after 2024, they'd say we got to back off this anti-white stuff, because look at what it is catalyzing on the other side, and they're losing white people.
	For her to come across and say, well, let's just say it.
	It's white men, they literally cannot contain themselves.
	Like they can't suppress their hatred.
	So that that's why it's surprising.
	Well, she said of a certain persuasion.
	She's talking about Christians.
	Yeah, of a certain religion, she says, persuasion, maybe she meant heterosexual, you know, because we're supposed to have a big gay, brown, you know, Hindu Stanny, what whatever kind of place.
	Um, so it's just pure malice and seething resentment.
	You'd think they'd have figured it out.
	Last year they had Tim Walls with the camo hat, if you remember that whole operation, and they recognize we know we got to appeal to the white men.
	I guess they forgot that.
	And now they want to go back to race.
	On Rumble, everywhere else.
	I'd I'd love to come on your show, brother.
	We have a lot of guests, but we really appreciate you.
	Powerful.
	I think it's the best interview yet.
	Thank you so much for the time and stay alive, buddy, because they're coming for you.
	Coming for me.
	You too, man.
	You too, man.
	Thanks for having me.
	Thank you.
	Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
	Welcome to the war room, InfoWars.com, band.video.
	I'm your host, Harrison Smith, joined today by Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	Uh, he, of course, has already been on with Alex for two full hours.
	So we really appreciate him uh giving us so much of his time, and he'll be on uh with us for this first hour.
	And then we got a lot of breaking news and big videos to get to.
	But I'm very happy to welcome my guest Nick Fuentes.
	You can follow him on X at Nick J. Fuentes, Nicholas J. Fuentes.com.
	And of course, he streams on Rumble.
	You can search America first or Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	Uh, Nick, welcome to the show, sir.
	Hey, what's going on, Harrison?
	Great to be with you.
	Uh, very, very good to have you on, man.
	How you been?
	I cannot believe it's been two weeks since Charlie Kirk's brutal murder.
	Uh, it feels like it happened yesterday.
	Uh, how's the last two weeks been for you?
	It's been difficult, I have to say.
	I don't know how you guys are handling it over there, but I'm sure you must be upgrading your security.
	And uh my first reaction is I'm worried about copycats, you know, copycats.
	Yeah, or maybe uh if there's an attack or conspiracy or something.
	So it's been a little nerve-wracking, but I've been hanging in there.
	I just can't imagine what they're going through, you know, his family, his people over there, but it's uh it's a scary time for all of us.
	How you've been holding up.
	Uh yeah, it's sort of sort of the same.
	It's kind of like I'm not sure how much more safe we could be, but it just, I mean, the violence is sort of spiraling out of control.
	I thought I thought your coverage of everything the day after, I think it was that Friday you did a show, was it was really spectacular.
	And I I could tell it it had affected you personally quite a bit.
	You know, obviously, you know, you were not the biggest fan of Charlie Kirk, and I've sort of felt the same way uh while he was alive.
	But since then, I've gotten this whole new appreciation for who he was and what he accomplished.
	Has your opinion of Charlie changed in the last two weeks as you've seen maybe more stuff you hadn't seen before?
	Uh no, not really, not tremendously.
	I mean, not my my opinion.
	I'll say it this way.
	My opinion of his of his profession has not changed at all.
	And I'm surprised that for so many it seems to be.
	I think, you know, and that's natural.
	He just was brutally executed, and people feel sorry for him.
	They feel sorry for his family.
	I get it.
	Uh, but I don't really think that his political legacy is that much different now than it was then.
	The one thing that has changed to me, this is what my opinion has changed about.
	And I've been saying this a lot, and I really feel this way.
	I was shocked, shocked at the outpouring of support from millions of people.
	I was surprised at how many people were really touched by his life and his work.
	And in particular, people were touched by his faith.
	And that is the part that I never really recognized.
	And it is important to recognize that that we are all Christians.
	You know, where we are Christians, we know I know you're a Christian, I'm Christian.
	We're all different kinds of Christians, but we all do profess the same God.
	And although politically my view hasn't changed at all.
	I did not agree with nearly anything that he was about in that sense.
	I guess I never recognized his Christian testimony, where I should have, I think.
	And, you know, now the evidence is overwhelming for that.
	So I think he was pretty remarkable in that way.
	But how about you?
	Did your view of him change since he was killed?
	Uh it has, honestly.
	I just, I don't think I appreciated uh what a force he was, how impactful he was and how big the organization was.
	And, you know, kind of like you, I almost feel bad.
	I remember uh my grandmother calling me probably five years ago and going, there's this young man named Charlie Kirk, and he's amazing.
	Well, you know, he's actually not really on the and she was kind of disappointed that I I wasn't a big fan of uh Charlie Kirk and she'd been so impressed by him.
	And I'm kind of like, oh man, maybe grandma was right.
	Maybe he did have something uh going on.
	I think maybe he could have been present.
	I just I didn't realize how uh how influential he really was.
	And, you know, I guess uh it's it's a little bit of uh regret on my part for not appreciating uh, you know, who he was while he's alive.
	And I guess that's the the martyr complex, right?
	Uh but I I want to get into like who you think did it, uh, your your reaction to the reaction to you not blaming Israel, if that makes sense, because people have gotten so mad at you and are just ready to throw you under the bus because you don't go with the first uh, you know, conspiracy theory offered.
	How do you feel about you know the way people are reacting to you?
	Because I gotta, I gotta say it a little, it's a little bit ironic because I think I texted this to you, because the Groupers say about us a lot of things I'm hearing about you now.
	So I I feel like maybe you understand some of the frustration that you know, we at InfoWars when like we're being called Israel shows, we're like, guys, what the hell's going on?
	We're just going for the truth.
	Uh you know, how do you feel about about people like saying all this stuff about you?
	Well, the timeline was really interesting because, you know, so he was killed two weeks ago on a Wednesday.
	I did a show about it that following Thursday.
	And my message on the show was very Christian.
	It was just like, let's not take up arms and pursue revenge.
	I said, let's try to uh be forgiving.
	Let's try to, you know, be intentional about what we do next.
	Let's try to focus on God and align our intentions with God and so on.
	I didn't even really talk too much about the forensic details of the assassination.
	I just talked about how we should all respond moving forward.
	I didn't do a show that Friday.
	The weekend went by, and by Sunday, people started to say, why is Nick Fuentes not talking about the Israel conspiracy?
	Why has he not said anything?
	Why is he avoiding it?
	Why is he covering it up?
	And I'm staying over here, like, hold the phone, covering it up, avoiding it.
	First of all, it's been four days.
	Second of all, my experience with Charlie Kirk my entire life, he canceled me for being an anti-Semite.
	That's how I knew him from 2019 until two weeks ago for a full six years is I was banned from his organization, banned from his events.
	He called me a Jew hater last month, a demonic Jew hater.
	So when people started to say there's this Israel connection, my first reaction is that's ridiculous.
	He was their biggest advocate.
	He was their biggest ally.
	Uh, and I understand all these arguments about he was evolving.
	I, your coverage was unbelievable, unbelievably prescient.
	The rumor you heard he was in fear for his life, or you heard it secondhand or whatever.
	Um, obviously that has been so prescient, and everything that's been discussed.
	But that was kind of my first reaction.
	The following day, that Monday, I came on, I did the show and I addressed it and I laid it all out.
	I discussed the Max Blumenthal piece, your coverage of it, every possible piece of evidence that might fit with an Israeli conspiracy.
	Then at the end, I said, I just don't think there's all that much there.
	I think these things coincided.
	In other words, it can be true that he was having second thoughts and maybe was defying the Israel lobby on some level, but also he was killed by some radical left-wing lunatic.
	Like these things can both be true at the same time.
	I said, I'm unconvinced that they're related because I don't see the connection between them outside of a circumstantial connection.
	And people said, Well, what are you defending Israel now?
	Now you're covering up, now you're pivoting.
	And I said, wait a second, my views on all of this have not changed even slightly.
	I mean, I'm the same guy I was on September 9th as I was on September 10th.
	I didn't like Charlie Kirk then.
	I don't like him now.
	I thought he was an Israel shill then.
	I think he's an Israel shill now.
	I just don't buy it.
	And for that, I just get this avalanche.
	Some of it's synthetic, some of it inorganic, some of it real, people doubting my credentials now.
	And honestly, it's just made me furious.
	And I can kind of sympathize with what a lot of people say about you guys at InfoWars.
	And in fairness, I push back on that.
	I said, look, I think they just disagree.
	I don't think they're in the pocket of Israel, but just maybe they don't agree with us that much.
	I'm in the same position.
	It's like I just don't agree.
	I'm not in the pocket.
	I just don't agree.
	So yeah, it's made me very sympathetic to you guys in that way.
	Well, the whole thing has been weird because I had the same reaction.
	I saw all these people going, Nick is shilling for Israel.
	And so I went and I watched your show, and I'm I'm having this weird experience of like cognitive dissonance where I'm like, am I watching the right episode?
	Because he's not chilling for Israel.
	But and so it was just this disconnect between what people were saying and what you were saying.
	And it was just baffling.
	And, you know, I think you, I think you're I think we're all experiencing uh, you know, some people say low IQ anti-Semitism, but there's this low IQ conspiracy theorizing now.
	I made I never go on TikTok.
	I went on TikTok yesterday because I saw somebody post something that was just crazy about Erica Kirk is a reptilian.
	I just thought, I'm just gonna go down this rabbit hole for a minute, see what people are saying.
	And I felt like it seemed literally demonic to me because the people were just saying the craziest stuff that had no connection to reality whatsoever.
	And there's thousands of them.
	They all have a hundred thousand likes on every video.
	And I'm like, you you gotta have some ounce of intelligence.
	You got to have something real to stake your flag on.
	And then you can, you know, speculate.
	But what do we do about the low IQ conspiracy theorizing?
	Because they're all over the place.
	And it's it's complete nonsense.
	A lot of it is complete and utter nonsense, whether it's about Israel or anything else.
	What the bottom is fallen out, it seems.
	And things are just insane on the, you know, the far conspiracy side.
	What do we do about this?
	I think we got to press them.
	I don't think that they should be silenced.
	I don't think that they should be covered up.
	I think that they should be we should look at their arguments and disassemble them, which is what I've done on my show.
	You know, I'm not going out there and saying it's impossible Israel was involved.
	I'm not saying that you don't have a right to believe that.
	Or, you know, even that maybe Charlie Kirk was chafing with the Israel lobby.
	It's just show me the evidence.
	And and where I focused in on this is on the evidence provided.
	And what's really interesting about that whole argument, I covered this on my show last night.
	It all stems from the piece by Max Blumenthal at the gray zone.
	And what I've pointed out is this is not a trustworthy guy to begin with.
	I don't, I don't care for this guy.
	I don't trust him.
	I know Alex had him on the show uh the other day.
	So I'm not going to talk too much trash, but suffice to say, I'm not his fan.
	And all of the speculation seems to proceed from this article, which is based on hearsay, where he reports that anonymous sources and close friends were making claims about a state of mind prior to the killing.
	And it centers around these two claims, one of which is that Netanyahu offer Charlie Kirk a bribe.
	And the second of which is this meeting with Bill Ackman.
	And those were kind of the two central claims.
	And over The past few weeks, you've seen that both of those things have completely blown up.
	Yesterday, Candace Owens and Max Blumenthal both said, well, we never claimed that Netanyahu offered 150 million dollar bribe.
	We never said that.
	Last week, Bill Ackman came out and spilled all the evidence about the meeting.
	And it turns out that Charlie Kirk arranged and organized that meeting.
	That was the basis of him feeling blackmailed and all these other things.
	And Blumenthal and Owens did not dispute any aspect of Bill Ackman's account of that story.
	So what do we do about the low IQ situation?
	For me, I just say, bring it on, bring it on.
	That's the answer.
	When people are saying nonsense like that, um, what we used to do, or what I should say the mainstream media did, what society did those people, including myself, would be censored, banned, censored, blacklisted, you're crazy, you're psycho, name-calling.
	For me, I would almost say, I would like to debate one of those people.
	I'd love to talk to Ian Carroll, Candace Owens, Blumenthal, whoever.
	I would love to debate one of those people and put it to bed.
	You bring your facts, I'll bring my facts.
	Let's just talk about what's true and what's in reality.
	I don't want to, you know, I don't like conspiracy theories on the left when they say a groiper killed Charlie Kirk.
	I don't like the psycho conspiracy stuff on the right when they say energy weapons are being shot from a trapdoor and there's 7,000 decoys.
	You know, I don't believe that either.
	So we have to just get to the bottom of it with honesty and and um, you know, without being afraid for where that's gonna lead.
	Yeah, it's uh it feels very weird.
	I I watched these videos on TikTok and I'm like, is this how people think we are?
	Like, because we're we're completely in a different class.
	We just want to go for the truth.
	But then, of course, there's the issue of okay, if there was some international, you know, uh involvement from Israel, I wouldn't trust our FBI to come out with that.
	And again, I'm in this weird position because Israel was never my I didn't even think it was Israel.
	It didn't even enter my mind.
	We've seen so much violence on the left, we've seen the transgender shooters.
	That was where my mind went first.
	Until somebody posted my old tweet, like, hey, a month ago, you said Charlie, and I was like, oh, right, that did happen.
	And so I'm in this weird position where like my tweet sort of started the whole thing, but I've never been the biggest Israel did it guy, but I do think it's worth looking at.
	And I think it it points to the bigger problem we have that if it was Israel, we would never know because our government is so controlled by them.
	Uh, how does that play into your interpretation of what's going on?
	Well, it goes without saying that you cannot trust the FBI.
	You cannot trust the DOJ.
	And why not?
	They just got done with another cover up.
	How about Jeffrey Epstein, you know, who killed himself allegedly in his cell or was murdered because he was silenced by the people in his black book, his client list.
	That was literally covered up in July.
	We're in the middle of an active cover-up of the Epstein scandal.
	Pam Bondi came out and said, there are no other third parties we're investigating.
	There is no black book, there's no list, there's no sex trafficking ring.
	There, there is no other evidence, even for us to give you.
	We were in the middle of that cover-up.
	And remember, that comes from DOJ and FBI working together, burying that.
	Now we're supposed to believe, like you said, whatever happened that day that they're going to be forthcoming about it.
	So the way that it factors in for me is we have to be skeptical about everything that we're hearing.
	We have to be skeptical about the FBI.
	We have to be skeptical about, in my opinion, people like Max Blumenthal.
	Blumenthal has ties to Russia.
	He has ties to Russian intelligence.
	He's a part of that whole Sputnik, Russia Today uh situation.
	He he changed his mind on Syria after he had a meeting.
	You know, so I think that's him, or maybe I'm confusing him with somebody else.
	But, you know, people like Blumenthal, as well as the FBI, you have to scrutinize all the sources.
	And by the same token, maybe the FBI's not covering this up.
	I mean, to the extent that they are a law enforcement agency, I mean, maybe they're reporting on some things that are true.
	We have to parse and discern all the information that we're getting.
	And we have to use our common sense.
	Like, for example, Andrew Colvet, who's the PR guy for Turning Point USA, he comes out last week and says, well, this 30 odd six bullet was stopped by Charlie Kirk's Superman bones, his man of steel, Adamantium skeleton.
	It's Like, yeah, I don't trust that.
	You know, I mean, and it doesn't mean I don't trust anything that this guy says.
	I mean, maybe some of it's true, but that doesn't make any sense at all.
	And that's the kind of stuff you need to scrutinize and say, wait a minute, that doesn't add up.
	We're gonna need corroborating evidence.
	If that's the case, show us the bullet, show us the autopsy, show us something that proves what you're saying.
	Because the way that sounds, when they start to use magical language like that and say, it's just it's miraculous, that's where you lose me.
	And I'm glad that Cash Patel came out uh last week and said, look, there's all these questions.
	These are the questions.
	We're gonna answer them.
	I like to hear that.
	That's a step in the right direction for transparency.
	But even when they deliver the verdict, we're gonna need to scrutinize that as well and make sure that, you know, everything checks out.
	So the the problem is you just can't trust anybody.
	You can't trust the FBI, you can't trust the internet.
	Uh, we're really kind of in the wilderness when it comes to that.
	Everybody kind of has to make up their own mind.
	Yeah, it's uh it's it's not a good place to be in.
	But again, I put the blame squarely on these institutions that have lied to us so many times and participated in so many cover-ups.
	Of course, we're not gonna trust them.
	Just like, of course, people are gonna blame Israel when the week before they're bombing the you know, Hamas negotiators and bragging about it.
	It's like, all right, if you don't want people blaming you for assassinations, you should probably stop killing so many people.
	I mean, it's not that it's really not that complicated, but it is difficult to figure out where the hell we're supposed to go from here.
	And I've got people, you know, online now, multiple people saying I am now a propaganda shill for the deep state because I use the term leftist violence.
	And it's like, what else am I supposed to call it?
	Like what I don't even understand what what we're doing anymore.
	If if we can't say leftist violence when you've got leftist people committing violence against ICE facilities, like what are we supposed to call it at this point?
	So yeah, it really feels like we're in this uh this very strange situation where I don't know who to trust and everything is both true and untrue at the same time.
	And pursuing the truth is is really just uh increasingly difficult in in any direction.
	So I guess, you know, on in the term or in the uh topic of like leftist violence and the the ice shooting that we saw earlier today.
	What do you think the solution to this is?
	I keep getting called the deep state chill because I'm like, hey, the federal government needs to intervene, but that's only because I don't want us to have to do it.
	I want to avoid the civil war that they're clearly planning.
	What is the solution to this?
	I do believe it's a law enforcement solution.
	And and you know, people use the slippery slope argument.
	They say, so you're saying Palantir should take over the world or something.
	It's like I think there are actions in between what we have going on now, which is just like a kill zone.
	I mean, let's be honest.
	You had they shot at Trump, another guy came and tried to kill him at Mar-a-Lago.
	Luigi Manjione shot the guy in the back of the head.
	You had three school shootings, which credibly could be say are connected to some kind of internet cell in Wisconsin, Tennessee, min in Minnesota, even in Colorado, the day Charlie Kirk was killed.
	I guess that was number four.
	The terrorist attacks against ICE.
	Like, we have a problem here that's not being detected.
	It's not being intercepted.
	And there's got to be a solution between let these people just kill everybody and Palantir takes away all our rights.
	And I think where you start is this stuff is on the internet.
	When you see the school shootings, the terrorist attacks, how about Tyler Robinson, for instance?
	He was on Discord apparently confessing, planning, other people knew in advance.
	Don't you think the FBI should look at that?
	Don't you think the FBI should look at that server, group chat, you know, whatever form it took, shouldn't the FBI be looking at that and seeing if there's accomplices, third parties?
	And shouldn't they then be looking at those left-wing networks?
	If there is organized left-wing violence, if it's being planned on forums or encouraged, it might be, it might even be encouraged by foreign intelligence.
	You know, when I look at some of these like satanic groups on forums, for example, that shooter in Minnesota, that transgender shooter, he was writing his uh his entire diary in Cyrillic.
	He was writing it in the Russian alphabet.
	And that's something that you see crop up with that cell.
	It's like international.
	There's like an international element.
	Whatever it is, whether it's homegrown left wing or there's some kind of international backing, I think you got to bring the government in and take a look at some of that stuff.
	So wherever that's being funded, sponsored, planned, um, you know, encouraged, there needs to be some kind of law enforcement response because the alternative, like you said, it's civil war.
	That's what they're egging on here.
	Yeah, and it seems like in a lot of ways, we on the right, I mean, for a long time, I've I've moved sort of away from from pure libertarianism as people, you know, perceive it.
	I still consider myself a libertarian just because liberty, anyway.
	We don't need to get into it.
	But it feels like a trick now.
	Now I look back and I go, man, this whole idea of like we can't use the government, but they can, that's such an obvious trap to that that we're stuck in.
	And it seems like that's almost evolved now to where a lot of people on the right are just terrified of using the government for anything, which is especially absurd when they're like, well, they're just opening up the you know, the door for the government to do that to us.
	And it's like they've been doing it to us for four years.
	Well, what are you talking about?
	I mean, they've been throwing people in jail, throw friends of mine in jail for 20 years when they weren't even at the Capitol.
	They got a text message.
	So I but I I still have that same instinct where I'm like, I don't want the government, you know, going out there arresting people because they claim they're anti.
	How do we prevent it from going too far?
	And and what is your response to people who are still have that sort of uh hesitation of using the government to do anything ever?
	Well, I I guess the political dilemma is that the right wing is who is in charge, but the right wing is controlled by Israel.
	You know, the Republican Party is controlled by Israel, the DOJ, the FBI are totally infiltrated by Israel.
	And so the reason that people have this trepidation about we want to use government is because, well, who is government?
	The government is infiltrated.
	So if we're if we are using government, it's not really us, it's them.
	And if they have that power, I mean they'll use it against the left, they'll use it against us.
	They'll use it against the Israel critical element on the right.
	At the same time, the left is real and the left is violent, and the left doesn't discriminate.
	They saw Charlie Kirk as a Nazi.
	They think Ben Shapiro's a Nazi.
	They think Nazis are bad.
	They think anyone that criticizes Israel for the wrong reasons is bad.
	Hassan Piker, he hates Israel.
	He also hates me because he thinks I'm a quote unquote real Nazi.
	So it's like to get protected from the violent left, you need to gang up with the Israel controlled right.
	If you don't, then you're going to be victimized by the Nazi hating white people hating left.
	And so that's that's the dilemma.
	There's no good options here.
	And um on some level, we also don't really have any control either.
	So the question is, what is to be done from our side?
	I mean, I don't know how much of what we do is going to change it one way or the other.
	People say that we shouldn't be cheering for it because then it might be used against us.
	I would say the more immediate threat, though, is that you got 30% of Generation Z liberals that think they could shoot right wing people.
	As long as that's us, I think those people gotta be arrested.
	So I on this one, I think I come down on the side of more law enforcement for now.
	I I think I do too.
	And again, it's just like damned if you do, damned if you don't.
	I want to get into the Hassan Piker stuff on the other side too, because that's an interesting uh tangled web.
	Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
	Nick Fuentes is my guest.
	And uh I just want to thank thank Nick for staying on with us for a full hour.
	So you already did two hours with uh Alex Jones.
	So big thanks for for spending so much time with us.
	You know, I'm looking forward to to having you on more because now I have a show that airs while you're awake.
	So that's uh very, very exciting.
	And now I get to I get to join the night owl uh uh time frame.
	And actually, I was thinking about, I think like five years ago, I first had you on American Journal, and I asked you about how it felt to experience your meteoric rise.
	And now it feels like you're going through another sort of series of um of explosive awareness uh throughout America.
	I got my dad sending me Nick Fuentes clips.
	He's like, I I see nothing but Nick Fuentes on TikTok.
	He loves TikTok uh and and you're all over it apparently.
	And uh you just did Patrick Bett David, that is a huge one.
	Uh obviously he's getting tons of views.
	How do you feel about uh people are saying you're going mainstream, not in a bad way, but like everybody's aware who you are now, and a lot of times you're sort of setting the the talking points for a huge swath of uh of America.
	How do you feel about this in the in the last few months?
	The uh the explosion of the growth of awareness about you.
	It's um well, it's been pretty exciting and it's been surprising.
	You know, you you kind of know the whole story, and I've known you guys at InfoWars forever.
	And for most of my career, people wouldn't touch me with the 10-foot pole.
	I was completely radioactive and suppressed and blacklisted.
	And um, you know, for a time you couldn't find me on the internet anywhere.
	I mean, my stuff Was so banned and suppressed.
	And I wasn't on Twitter.
	There was no rumble at that time.
	I was banned on all the mainstream stuff.
	And so to see it kind of reaching this level of saturation, it's almost hard to believe.
	It almost feels like I'm waiting for the next shoe to drop.
	You know, maybe I'm a little cynical in that way.
	But it's it's been pretty great.
	I've been uh very pleased about it.
	I've been happy.
	Oh, I've been loving uh seeing it, honestly.
	It's it's about damn time because uh what you've what you've always said is is always this, it's been the same the entire time.
	Uh people think that that you change your message or anything.
	Have you changed your message at all?
	I mean, as you sort of are getting more awareness, are you tempted to sort of change your tactics or are you just like, hey, this this works, I'm gonna keep doing it.
	Any thought about that?
	Uh, the only thing I would change is just cleaning up the language.
	I have such a foul mouth on my show.
	I mean, the swear words and not even the racial slurs.
	I know Patrick Bed David gave me a really hard time about my use of a certain racial slur, kind of the most famous one.
	And uh, it's not even just that, but just, you know, now that I'm entering the mainstream, I said it the other week when uh Charlie Kirk died.
	I do feel a bit of a responsibility now to kind of bring put my best foot forward, so to speak, and really bring people the most sophisticated, the most advanced show, uh, and not really do kind of the self-indulgent, sloppy stuff.
	But I mean, look, the reason that people like the message is because it's raw.
	It's raw, it's honest, it's the truth.
	The reason people love the clips, the reason people love the show is because they're just not getting that message on the mainstream stuff.
	They're getting it maybe from independent media.
	I know you talk about a lot of the same stuff Alex does too.
	You know, many people on this side of the internet do, but in the mainstream, you're not getting an honest take on Israel.
	You're just not.
	You're not getting an honest take about Judaism for that matter.
	You're not getting an honest take about race, immigration, black and white crime.
	And so the reason people love the show, it's not just that it's super honest, but they also like that it's no pretense.
	It's no, it's not overly produced, it's not overly manicured, it's just raw, it's funny, it's shocking.
	And so, you know, I would push back on some of the criticism.
	A lot of people uh lately have been giving me all this advice.
	Candace Owens told me I internet too hard, whatever that means.
	It's like interneting is what got me to this point.
	Interneting is why everyone under the age of 30 does not support Israel anymore.
	Interneting is is what is causing this mass awakening.
	So, you know, that's what a lot of people do is they start to get mainstream success and they change the ingredients.
	You know, they change the secret formula.
	I'm not really looking to change the secret formula.
	I want to polish it up, I want to clean it up.
	I want to, you know, get it more professional.
	But other than that, I'm sticking with the original recipe.
	You know, I'm sticking with the original spices and herbs, so to speak.
	It works well.
	I mean, you one of the hardest things about doing this show is that we're on the radio, so I can't curse.
	And it's like such a limiting.
	I mean, I would be cursing like a sailor just from the stuff we have to talk about, really makes you want to curse quite a bit.
	Uh when you when you talk about, so there seems to be this massive opportunity that we're missing, which is that so many people on both sides of the aisle are against Israel and want, if nothing else, America to have freedom of action outside of the concerns of our supposed ally in the Middle East.
	And yet it's like, wow, can't we come together?
	Like, you guys don't like what's happening.
	We don't like what's happening.
	And then you look over there and they're all, you know, saying, hey, let's kill all white men, and you go, oh, right.
	No, they're we can't unify with these people.
	They hate they hate everything that we represent.
	It's like, can't we all be America first?
	Oh no, they think that means you're a Nazi.
	So it's like, is there any hope for outreach to the left?
	I think you mentioned, I think it was in on the Thursday or Friday show after uh the assassination, where you said you were like, you know, you had some outreach to people like Hassan Piker, people on the left who at least you align on Israel.
	Hey, maybe we could do something together here.
	And, you know, what was the response to that?
	Or, you know, what what's been your strategic thinking and uh in regards to the left being also anti-Israel?
	The left has totally rejected and repudiated that.
	Uh, you know, I've gone viral on TikTok for criticizing Israel.
	And all the comments will say I'm left wing.
	I can't believe I'm agreeing with Nick Fuentes.
	I can't believe a blow, a broken clock is right twice a day and so on.
	And I'll and I thought over the summer, maybe naively, That could be the basis for sort of a transcendent movement that brings together maybe people from the right and the left.
	But after the Charlie Kirk shooting, and even right around that time, that that whole advance has been totally rejected by people like Hassan Piker and others who have said, well, it's really a big trick.
	He says he's against Israel, but he's not really, or he is against Israel for the wrong reasons.
	And he's only trying to appeal to you cynically.
	Um, and so I think when it comes to the far left, when it comes to the communists, there can be no truce, there's no middle ground.
	And I think um, I know this is a lesson I learned early on, forgot, and I'm now learning all over again.
	You know, for the past couple of years, we've been really going in on the war in Gaza.
	And it's easy to forget the left, even the Muslims, they have different goals than we do.
	We might have certain things in common, like we're against what's happening over there, but maybe that's the beginning and end of it because the far left, you know, even to the extent that you've got Muslims outside of America, inside of America that feel the same way, they got a very different vision for America.
	And so, you know, we got to be very clear, we got to take our own side and what our own side is, it's right wing, it's Christian, it's pro-white, and it's critical of Israel.
	It has to be all those things.
	It can't have, it can't not have any one of those things.
	So I got some clarity on that, I guess.
	Yeah, it it I guess fundamentally we approach it from different perspectives.
	And I think you've talked a little bit about this, the communists who hate Israel.
	And it seems to me like they're right about Israel for the same reason they're wrong about just about everything else.
	They see the whole world between just like the white oppressors and the the poor brown people.
	And so they apply that to Israel and they happen to land on the right side of that conflict.
	But, you know, I approach it from a Christian perspective and even a nationalistic perspective that these people, you know, deserve to have a say over their their destiny uh in this piece of land.
	And I feel like it's the same reasoning I have for why I don't like the Muslim takeover of the UK.
	It's like if you know, if you're on opposite sides when it comes to immigration to UK and what's happening to Palestine, it's like, all right, you've got a different set of priorities than I do.
	Uh, and it is, it's disappointing because it seems like there is such an overwhelming majority of people in America who are sick of the status quo, but we cannot move forward because of this uh because of this divide.
	And, you know, I I don't know what it's gonna take to bring us together or if it's ever even possible.
	I'm worried about a false flag.
	I know you're worried about, you know, war with Iran.
	And as I play it out in my head, I'm like, whatever the false flag is that's coming that I think we all feel in our bones, it's gonna have to be huge.
	It's not gonna be a single assassination.
	I think it's gonna have to be something so overwhelming and traumatic on a nationwide scale that like we all revert to just like trust the authorities.
	I just need to hear what to do at this point.
	What do you think is coming next in terms of World War III, the Iran uh Israel conflict, Russia, Ukraine.
	Do you think a false flag's in the future, a real attack?
	What do you think is next?
	I think it's very possible.
	And I I've said that from the beginning, because of course, that is what Israel's been driving at from the start is they wanted decapitate Iran and first they want to denuclearize Iran.
	And to do both of those things, they need the United States involved.
	But the United States has no appetite to get involved.
	Well, how are they going to remedy that?
	Well, they'll come up with a reason for us to get involved, which will be something like a 9-11, a new Pearl Harbor, a new 9-11.
	That's sort of just like the obvious logical way to work it out.
	And that's why I thought it was likely.
	And if you've been following it just this past week, the snapback sanctions were triggered against Iran at the end of August.
	They're going into effect next week at the end of September.
	There was a preliminary deal between the IAEA and Iran to bring inspectors back into Iran to look at their damaged nuclear facilities and disclose the location of the enriched uranium.
	That deal was agreed upon by the Iranian government last week.
	Well, even though Iran agreed to bring the inspectors back, the sanctions are still going into effect as scheduled, according to uh a meeting of the Security Council last week.
	So, in other words, the Europeans reneged on the deal.
	The Europeans said if you let the inspectors come back, if you re-engage with the IAEA, then we will release the sanctions.
	But they're not holding it up.
	Iran took the inspectors.
	They're keeping the sanctions on board anyway.
	So this week, Iran says, forget about it.
	No inspectors are coming in.
	That's not gonna happen.
	And then today, Grossi, who's the head of the IAEA came out and said Iran is enriching to 90%.
	Weapons grade uranium, highly enriched uranium.
	They're going to build a bomb.
	And so there was a piece in foreign policy magazine a couple months ago.
	It said the timeline is that there's going to be a second Iran war before the end of this year.
	It's going to happen in the fall.
	It's going to be surrounding the snapback sanctions debate.
	And the reason it's going to happen then also is because Israel does not want Iran to re-arm.
	Right.
	In the time between the war in June and the end of this year, Iran can, if they wanted to enrich to 90%, maybe build a primitive nuclear device.
	They could rearm their air defenses and other defenses.
	They're bringing in advanced systems from Russia, uh, fighter jets and air defense, anti-aircraft guns.
	And so Israel wants to prevent that.
	So I think that the timeline we're talking about is before the end of the year, we might be looking at who knows, a dirty bomb, you know, some kind of significant false flag.
	And if not that, it might just be a second phase of the war in June to continue to degrade Iran's infrastructure, their military equipment.
	But make no mistake about it.
	I mean, the driving force of Israel is to bring down Iran.
	They're going to do it with us.
	And there's only one way to bring us in, and that's at some point, they're going to try and trigger something with a catastrophe on our soil.
	I think that's where it's headed.
	I I think so too.
	I think it's the only uh way forward.
	So I'm almost like trying to preempt being like the Israeli false flags coming, just almost like Alex was doing before 9-11, going, hey, we're called the White House and tell them if you try to blow up the World Trade Center with Osama bin Laden, we know it's really you.
	Just to almost, you know, hopefully get into their calculus.
	Ah, gee, we might not get away with this.
	Maybe we should try something else.
	Because obviously, Israel wants to destroy Iran.
	And you know, you you're one of the best at like articulating what actually the plan is on how they need to get rid of this uh regional power so they can be a regional superpower, then they won't need America anymore.
	They need America.
	They need American boots on the ground to defeat Iran, just as a matter of mathematics.
	They they cannot do it themselves.
	They're desperate to bring that about.
	I I want to I want to know if you uh what do you think about this interpretation of of Trump's willingness to go along with everything Israel is doing?
	Because it seems to me maybe the same thing that happened with him in Ukraine, where it's almost like these forces are going ahead already.
	Israel's gonna bomb Iran, Israel's gonna bomb the Hamas negotiators in Qatar.
	That makes Trump look weak if he wants them to stop and they do it anyway.
	So he just goes, Oh, that was my idea, actually.
	I'm not weak.
	I wasn't fooled by our allies.
	That was my idea.
	I told him to do that.
	And it's like, what a bizarre strategy.
	But that that's what it seems like he's doing.
	It seems like he's doing with Ukraine too.
	They signed all these agreements to guarantee weapon shipments.
	They're gonna try to start a war with Russia, and he's like, Well, I don't want to look like an idiot.
	So I'll say it was my idea.
	Well, what do you think?
	What do you think the likelihood is that that's what's motivating him?
	Uh, I think that's always what it is.
	I think that Israel acts and the White House reacts.
	Israel bombs Iran, then they tell the White House.
	Israel bombs Qatar, then they tell the White House.
	And then the White House is picking up the pieces.
	And you're exactly right.
	I mean, their attack on Qatar, which happened the day before Charlie Kirk was killed, which is sort of interesting timing.
	This is something that obviously the United States would be opposed to.
	We have our largest base in the region in Qatar.
	They are mediating uh the war in Gaza, the war in Iran, all of this stuff.
	We have deep ties.
	Trump visited that country.
	So it's obviously something he didn't want.
	And if Israel bombs them from the Red Sea, then that means that either the United States didn't know about it, and therefore, like you said, he's weak and can't control them.
	He's not in control of the situation, uh, or he's going to have to reprimand Israel or take control of it in some way.
	So he sort of takes this middle path where he says, yeah, you know, we knew about it and we don't love it.
	And then he goes and plants a story in the Washington Post and says that he's furious with Netanyahu.
	He's really unhappy.
	So they got him between a rock and a hard place.
	And it's hard to discern what his real mentality is because there's so much deception.
	You know, when the Iran war kicked off in June, uh, they made it seem like he knew about it the whole time.
	And basically he was stringing the Iranians along and and tricking them so that they would be vulnerable and Israel could catch them with their guard down.
	We don't even know.
	That might have been face-saving.
	So we just don't know.
	It seems that he lies.
	He lies to Iran.
	He lies to the public.
	So it's impossible to say what he really feels on this.
	But what is clear is he cannot restrain them.
	He is unwilling or unable to restrain them.
	And for that reason, it doesn't really make a difference what his mindset is, because the result is the same.
	Yeah, it really is just uh pathetic.
	And I don't know if you've seen it.
	You may have been on air when it when it broke or it may have come out earlier, Tucker Carlson giving an interview to uh Glenn Greenwald and saying he has, you know, firsthand knowledge that Nanyahu's going around bragging that he controls America.
	And it's like Trump is such a prideful guy.
	Does that not hurt him?
	Like is is he not willing to stand up just because he's being made to look like such a fool on the world stage?
	And and of course, we know that Iran has to be the ultimate goal.
	And I feel like Israel has has invested so much.
	They really did a gamble here.
	They've behaved so abominably.
	If they, if this doesn't end in the, you know, defenestration of the Ayatollah, if this doesn't end in a total destruction of Iran, they're gonna be in a lot of trouble because Iran's still there and everybody else hates them.
	So like they have to, they have to have this end with Iran.
	It seems like they they're in this, uh, they've gambled too much.
	It's a sunk cost fallacy at this point, and it seems like they're willing to do anything.
	Again, as you play it out in your in your head, what is the future of Israel with all of these all of Europe is turning against them, apparently.
	Again, I don't even know what to trust anymore, but apparently they're recognizing a Palestinian state.
	The EU's cutting off weapons transfers.
	If America turns away from them, uh there's they have no allies.
	Like, what is the future of Israel with the trajectory that we're currently on?
	Well, it's all in flux right now, and and it's really it's the biggest gamble.
	And Netanyahu is gambling the fate of Israel on this because, like you said, this whole process has turned the entire world against them in a way that it never was.
	The entire world is united against Israel, including Europe, including most of the public in the United States, certainly the entire left, most of the young, increasingly significant proportions of the right wing, too.
	Um, and if they're not successful, by the way, they've also turned all the Muslim countries against them too.
	Right.
	You've got Iran working with Egypt.
	You've got Egypt building up their security in the Sinai.
	You've got Iran having a reproachment with Saudi Arabia.
	They they're all getting together at the Arab League and the OIC last week to put out this joint statement.
	So if they're not successful, it sounds like they're screwed.
	They don't have America in in 10, 20 years.
	They don't have Europe.
	The whole Muslim world is against them.
	So it's basically win or catastrophe.
	They either topple Iran, they force Syria, Lebanon, Iran into the Abraham Accords, they become unimaginably wealthy and they become their own global power, or it could be like uh an unprecedented setback for that country in a way that they've really never experienced.
	They've been around for 80 years, and it's only been up and up for them in in many ways, uh, in broad strokes.
	So I think that's just gonna be fought out, and it's gonna come down to are they able to decapitate Iran?
	Because if they are, then there is no meaningful opposition in the Middle East, maybe from Turkey, maybe from Egypt, but I mean, really, it's Iran that is built like a fortress to withstand the storm like this.
	So it's all gonna come down to that and and whether the United States is gonna get involved and how successful the this conflict will be.
	And of course, that river runs right through the war with Russia, the war with China, the war with Venezuela.
	So I mean, it's it's not, I don't think an exaggeration or alarmism to say we're on the precipice here.
	Like we are we're staring down the cliff right now, and it's uh it's pretty freaky.
	I'm not gonna lie.
	I don't know what's on the other side of it.
	Well, and it's it's weird too, because it's almost like we've been warning them about this since, you know, uh late October 2023, right?
	We saw the way they were bombing hospitals and stuff, and even from the beginning, it was like, y'all, you can't do this.
	You can't just bomb, you know, innocent people forever, and we get called anti-Semite and all this other stuff.
	But in reality, they have really made their bed.
	Now they're having to lie in it.
	And it's it's very disturbing when you think about you know where this goes.
	Uh, it's almost like, man, they probably should have listened to the so-called anti-Semites when we were telling them, hey, this is not a is not a good look, y'all, for lack of a better term.
	Uh, but but they pursue it relentlessly.
	And it is this weird thing where you've got Israel and you've got NATO both trying desperately to start a war with a power that they cannot defeat without America.
	And thank God Trump at least seems like he's, you know, trying to avoid full-fledged war with these uh two forces, but he's sort of capitulated on Ukraine, apparently.
	Uh uh, I mean, everything is so is so, you know, topsy-turvy.
	But I mean, what do you think the strategy is here?
	Trying to get America into these two wars that we don't want to be in, that the American people definitely don't want to be in.
	I don't know if they can, you know, blackfail blackmail enough pedophile congressmen to get to get the wars going uh that they really want.
	So, I mean, what is wh why are they acting like this?
	I guess my question.
	Why are they trying to start fights that they cannot win when they especially when they can't rely on their ally America?
	Well, I think they're both different in their own way.
	I think that, of course, Europe is terrified of Russia.
	Russia is testing.
	They're they're testing and they're pushing uh forcefully against the periphery of the American Empire.
	That's what NATO is.
	NATO is part of the American Empire, and NATO is trying to expand its borders into Ukraine.
	Russia's pushing back on that.
	NATO is worried that Russia won't stop there, that they're gonna keep pushing on the Baltic states, on Poland, and eventually they're gonna come for Europe.
	And they're right, they're right to believe that because Europe cannot defend itself against Russia.
	Europe does not have the industrial capacity, does not have the military for that.
	They they just don't have the arms or the personnel, the readiness.
	They they're just not prepared for that.
	And so Europe is worried about its security.
	They're so caught up in Ukraine because they say Ukraine is sort of like the first domino of Ukraine goes, and they're all gonna go.
	And they and they know they can't fight.
	So they want the United States to guarantee Ukraine's security, and in doing so, guarantee their security in the future.
	Now, the United States is having difficulty doing that because we are spread way too thin.
	They just reported that the United States is not giving out any more patriot missile defense systems because we're out of them.
	Right.
	And think about that.
	Missile defense is fundamental in the conflict in Ukraine and the conflict in Israel and the conflict in Taiwan.
	We're out of those systems, and we're not making enough of them.
	Russia makes enough artillery, drones, ammunition, you name it.
	They they're a war machine.
	We can't make the systems.
	We're spread too thin.
	So we can give Ukraine those kinds of security guarantees.
	That's why we've been begging NATO for the past 10 years, spend more money on your military, because the the balance of power is changing.
	And so what is happening all across the world is this world historical turning, going from this unipolar moment to a multipolar moment.
	Russia is testing the boundaries of American empire.
	China is testing the boundaries of American Empire.
	Israel, in some sense, is acting as a freelancer.
	That they, as uh, as a middle power, they're sort of freelancing and they're pursuing opportunities while America's weak, while also expecting that we're gonna join it on their side.
	So they're a little bit unique in their own way.
	But I guess suffice to say, why are Israel and Russia, Europe and China, why are these countries acting in this way?
	It's because the world order as we know it is destabilizing.
	And that is because America is decreasing in relative terms, and China and Russia are increasing in relative terms, such that now the United States, with NATO, Japan, the quad, whatever, they're coming into parody with China, Russia, and its allies.
	And so we're really getting into kind of like a bimodal or bipolar system of bricks versus the US and its alliances.
	And the the former is challenging the latter, and they're challenging it everywhere it is.
	The whole world has turned into a chessboard, a battlefield where these forces are expressing themselves.
	And so I think, you know, what's on the other side of it, it's literally a world war.
	We're already in one.
	Right.
	In Latin America, in Western Africa, in the Middle East, and even the Baltics and Eastern Europe, in uh in South Asia, East Asia, everywhere you look, it's a march towards war.
	So that's where it's at.
	It seems like that.
	And it seems like uh the people in power, even here in this country are doing everything they can to to push that forward again.
	Why you would want to drive Russia into the hands of China if China is this big existential threat and Russia is for all intents and purposes a European white nation Christian.
	Why would it just it makes no sense unless you think of it as okay, it's not people acting in America's interest, it's people who sort of have determined that America has served its purpose and now has to sort of be destroyed so the center of power can can move away and more towards the east.
	absolutely fascinating stuff.
	Thank you so much for staying with us for so long.
	Follow Nick on X at Nick J Fuentes, Nicholas J Fuentes.com, and of course, America First on Rumble.
	Thank you so much for being with us, Nick.
	Thank you for having me.
	My pleasure.
	Well, we'll do it again soon.
	Stay with us, folks.
	We'll be right back.
	So uh you were just telling me that you had a brain disease.
	I started having seizures like a few years ago, and everybody in my family knows I'm a neuroscientist.
	What did you do to fix it?
	Methylene blue.
	I'd take it.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	Mel Gibson was on here talking about it.
	This stuff works, man.
	I take it every day as well.
	And RFK Jr. told me about it.
	Yeah, man, it's fantastic.
	What is Bobby Kennedy Jr. dropping into that glass of water?
	Plenty of folks are wondering what was in that little bottle he uncorked during a flight.
	Methylene blue.
	Shower Kennedy taking it.
	Kennedy is literally gobbles.
	He must be doing something right.
	That ripped bond is 73 years old.
	You shouldn't have to tell a doctor about methylene blue.
	I think everybody should know about it.
	It's changed my life.
	I was in a wheelchair.
	That methylene blue, I knew what that did for me.
	I knew that it got me up and walking again.
	And I was having seizures without it.
	And and I was bad, really bad.
	So I ordered it.
	I started taking it.
	And boy, let me tell you something.
	What a blessing.
	It clears the brain fog where you're actually able to focus more clearly.
	For me, it's like a fog linden, but it was like a veil lifted off, you know?
	Incredible.
	Best product that I've purchased so far.
	It is a miracle.
	It's been proven for a hundred years.
	It's the one of the most well-proven drugs out there.
	Let me tell you something.
	I'm walking without a cane.
	I take one pill a day of the Ivermexon with the methylene blue, and I gotta tell you, what a blessing.
	I I am so blessed.
	My kids take it, my wife takes it.
	Everybody takes it.
	I used to have to pay what, $10,000 a week?
	Right.
	To get it in my arm and sit there for six hours a day to get it pumped in my system.
	And now I can take two pills or drink it once a day.
	Right.
	And pay what?
	I don't know.
	Four thirty, forty dollars a bottle of it?
	Depends on what the sale is, yeah.
	Yeah.
	And it's helping me to have a quality of life that I didn't have before that I have now.
	And I gotta tell you, what a blessing.
	I don't care what anybody says.
	I know what it's like with it, and I know what it's like without it.
	Yeah!
	I'm not paid to say this, not one time.
	This is the best product you guys have ever had.
	You guys gotta order it at the Alex Jones.com.
	Our methylene blue, medical grade, made in Florida, is incredible.
	Cleans out your mitochondria, clarity, focus, energy.
	You've seen the ray reviews of every guess we've had on.
	It's game changing.
	I feel like wow.
	There's power and coalescing all your thoughts.
	Did you hear our last guess what she said happened to her?
	No.
	What?
	She said brain fog just lifted.
	That's what it feels like.
	I feel lighter.
	It's it's really interesting.
	I I I almost like feel smarter.
	This stuff kicked in and it like instantly, I just felt like this weird meditative energy.
	I don't know how to explain it.
	I don't feel jittery.
	I just felt like instantly like I went from five hours of sleep like I got last night to like ten hours.
	I don't know how to explain it.
	This stuff's new to me, but I like it.
	Methylene blue works for me.
	I feel it in my head and neck, too.
	My brain's going really fast.
	I really like it.
	Unlimited population power!
	Volunteer power!
	Ha ha ha!
	Ha ha ha ha!
	Ha ha ha!
	Woo!
	You feel instant energy, but without the jitteriness of caffeine and focus.
	What I feel, what I felt was focus, mental focus.
	I do feel like it's eliminated the brain fog a lot.
	I do uh subscribe to um the methylene blue.
	I feel better.
	I feel like I'm 25.
	Like this, I've been taking the methylene blue, and it is freaking awesome.
	I actually subscribe monthly now to it.
	And I got a couple other people that I work with.
	I guess I'm methane, and they did the same thing.
	I'm jacked up on the methylene blue.
	It's the best thing you guys have ever had.
	Please go to the Alex Jones.com.
	Powered by methylene blue.

▲