President Trump has now responded through a surrogate, Bill O'Reilly, to the Jeffrey Epstein case whitewash cover-up firestorm, now in its fourth day, engulfing the internet and threatening the very future of MAGA.
But finally, Trump has responded.
We're about to break it down right now.
We're about to break it down.
Well, since Monday, we've been asking for it, and now we've gotten the answer from Bill O'Reilly, close confidant of President Trump.
We know that it's bigger than just an Epstein list.
There's the videos, there's the 14 terabytes that Trump's FBI raided back in March that the Democrats were hiding in New York at the FBI offices.
So it's a red herring to say, oh, it's a client list.
Obviously, it's a lot bigger than just a client list.
They don't call it a client list.
It's a whole spectrum of videos and notes and files that Epstein had in his intelligence agency blackmail operation.
So we were simply saying, hey, you said this was there.
It was reported this was there.
And now you're saying it doesn't exist.
That's what people got so upset.
But going back to an interview over a year ago with Lex Friedman and Trump, he says, yeah, I'll release 9-11.
I'll release JFK.
I'll release MLK.
I'll release it all, but I'm not sure about Epstein because that might implicate innocent people.
Well, obviously, Epstein was involved with a whole bunch of people in business and everything else that weren't involved in molesting underage girls.
So I had said in the last few days, that's probably what this is, is they just say a list of whoever knew Epstein.
We don't want to release that publicly because they're not all guilty.
Well, that makes sense.
But you can't conflate that with the 14 terabytes that the AG Pam Bondi said shows a bunch of kids, hundreds of new victims being raped.
So that's two separate issues.
So clearly, the way this has been presented to Trump is, hey, here's a list of all of Epstein's associates.
A bunch of innocent people are in this.
Should we release it?
He goes, well, no, we shouldn't do that.
They deserve to be processed.
Well, everybody does.
That is different than all the hard drives grabbed at Zorro Ranch and New Mexico and everything else in New York, Epstein Island, Little St. John's, all of it.
So now we're getting answers on this.
I'll show you the Bill O'Reilly clip that just came out today.
I'll show you the clip from last year with Lex Freeman.
So Trump has had this limitedly brought to him.
It said, should we put all the names of these people that have due process and are innocent?
He's like, well, no, a list of anybody he ever talked to on the phone shouldn't be.
That makes sense.
But all of the terabytes of child rape that Bondi says she has, that needs to be answered for.
And I guess we've got to have congressional hearings about that.
But now we're understanding what's going on.
And everybody, myself and others, have pointed at that original thing he said a year ago.
And now this is a repeat.
And I believe Bill O'Reilly.
So now we've got some basic answers.
We've got to investigate from this ongoing.
The investigation should stay open.
This is not closed.
Here's the clips.
I talked to President Trump man to man, eye to eye, on St. Patrick's Day about this and the Kennedy files and the King files.
It was all one conversation.
And he said, and I agree, there are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein's conduct.
They maybe had lunch with him or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another.
If that name gets out, those people are destroyed.
Because there's not going to be any context.
Media doesn't care about context.
So you can't do that.
You can't destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be.
But a lot of big people went to that island.
But fortunately, I was not one of them.
It's just very strange for a lot of people that the list of clients that went to the island has not been made public.
Yeah.
It's very interesting, isn't it?
It probably will be, by the way.
So if you're able to, you'll be.
Yeah, I'd certainly take a look at it.
Now, Kennedy's interesting because it's so many years ago.
They do that for danger, too, because, you know, it endangers certain people, et cetera, et cetera.
So Kennedy is very different from the Epstein thing.
But yeah, I'd be inclined to do the Epstein.
I'd have no problem with it.
You were just telling me that you had a brain disease, and you, what did you do to fix it?
I found this guy, he's a functional medicine guy, and he got me on methylene blue.
And that instantly stopped everything.
I'd take it.
Okay.
Yeah.
I take it every day as well.
And RFK Jr. told me about it.
Yeah, man, it's fantastic.
And so this guy's injecting in 1890, injects these rats with it and then does an autopsy on these things.
And their brain, the brainstem, every single nerve is blue.
So he discovered this methylene blue has an affinity for neuronal tissue.
So he says, well, it's sucking into neurons and working in the body.
So we started putting it in humans and we found out it's an MAOI, which helps with depression and anxiety and all kinds of life stress and stuff.
It is so incredible that it acts as an electron donor to mitochondria, especially your neuronal mitochondria.
So it helps you produce more ATP and it helps you get rid of this stuff called reactive oxygen species.
So you have an oxygen molecule that should have two hydrogens on it and like your body's job is to convert stuff into water so you can pee it out.
So if you get an oxygen molecule, it's got four, five, one, it's a reactive oxygen, which we call free radicals.
So methylene blue goes in there and balances a lot of those things out in your brain and your nervous system.