| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Fox News is reporting that President Trump, according to White House sources, is considering using a tactical nuclear weapon on the main Iranian nuclear facility because the bunker busters might not be able to take it out. | |
| Iran's already said they'll attack our carriers, our ships, and U.S. bases if the U.S. directly strikes them. | |
| That will lead to the Strait of Hormuz being blocked by Iran, gas prices exploding, massive inflation, and the destruction of Trump's economic agenda. | |
| All the economists agree. | |
| But it just gets worse from there. | |
| The U.S. already dropped the only two atomic weapons on Japan in 1945, Hiroshima and Akasaki. | |
| The whole world will turn against us if Trump nukes a nuclear site they claim is full of all this highly enriched uranium, which will make Chernobyl look pale insignificant, according to all the physicists and scientists. | |
| So, is it true? | |
| Or is that a lie on the White House? | |
| Is Trump talking about using tactical nuclear weapons against Iran's nuclear sites? | |
| And as General Flynn said, there's no such thing as a tactical nuclear weapon. | |
| Have people thought this through? |
Export Selection