All Episodes
Feb. 2, 2018 - InfoWars Special Reports
13:58
Anonymous Reads The Declassified FISA Memo
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Time Text
Bing, bing, bong, bong, bing, bing.
So now, Infowars.com, send the link out to everybody, Infowars.com/show or Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, wherever you're watching or local radio stations or TV stations.
Tell your friends, your neighbors, your family, your coworkers.
People that disagree with you.
Go read this for yourself because this is all, just looking at it, is exactly what we knew was there.
How they did it, how they carried it out, where they perjured themselves, the crimes that have been committed, it's all laid out in a devastating four-page memo detailing the FISA court and then the public statements and all of it.
This is incredible.
The White House, Washington, February 2nd, 2018. The Honorable Devin Nunes.
Chairman, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, United States Capitol, Washington, D.C., 20515. Dear Mr. Chairman, On January 29, 2018, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, here and after the committee, voted to disclose publicly a memorandum containing classified information provided to the committee in connection with its oversight activities, the memorandum, which is attached to this letter.
As provided by Clause 11G of Rule 10 of the House of Representatives, the Committee has forwarded this memorandum to the President based on its determination that the release of the memorandum would serve the public interest.
The Constitution vests the President with the authority to protect national security secrets from disclosure.
As the Supreme Court is recognized, It is the President's responsibility to classify, declassify, and control access to information bearing on our intelligence, resources, and methods, and national defense.
See example, Department of Navy v.
Eagan, 484, United States, 518-527, 1988. In order to facilitate appropriate congressional oversight, the executive branch may entrust classified information to the appropriate committees of Congress.
As it is done in connection with the committee's oversight activities here, the executive branch does so on the assumption that the committee will responsibly protect such classified information consistent with the laws of the United States.
The committee has now determined that the release of the memorandum would be appropriate.
The executive branch, across administrations of both parties, has worked to accommodate congressional requests to declassify specific materials in the public interest.
However, The President understands that the protection of our national security represents its highest obligation.
Accordingly, He has directed lawyers and national security staff to assess the declassification requests consistent with established standards governing the handling of classified information, including those under Section 3.1 of Executive Order 13526. Those standards permit declassification when the public interest in disclosure outweighs any need to protect the information.
The White House review process also included input from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Justice.
Consistent with this review and these standards, The president has determined that declassification of the memorandum is appropriate.
Based on this assessment and in light of the significant public interest in the memorandum, the president has authorized the declassification of the memorandum.
To be clear, the memorandum reflects the judgments of its congressional authors.
The president understands that oversight concerning matters related to the memorandum may be continuing.
Though the circumstances leading to the declassification through this process are extraordinary, The Executive Branch stands ready to work with Congress to accommodate oversight requests consistent with applicable standards and processes, including the need to protect intelligence sources and methods.
Sincerely, Donald F. McGann II, Counsel to the President.
C.C. The Honorable Paul Ryan, Speaker of the House of Representatives.
The Honorable Adam Schiff, Ranking Member, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
This memorandum provides members an update on significant facts relating to the committee's ongoing investigation into the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation in their use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act during the 2016 presidential election cycle.
Our findings, which are detailed below, raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain DOJ and FBI interactions with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
And two, represent a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.
Investigation Update On October 21, 2016, DOJ and FBI sought and received a FISA probable cause order, not under Title VII, authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. Page is a U.S. citizen who served as a volunteer advisor to the Trump presidential campaign.
Consistent with requirements under FISA, the application had to be first certified by the Director or Deputy Director of the FBI. It then required the approval of the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General or the Senate-confirmed Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division.
The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute, 50 U.S. Code, Section 1805, subsection D1. A FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the FISC every 90 days, and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause.
Then Director James Coney signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI. And Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one.
then a Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, then Acting Deputy Attorney General Dan Abonte, then Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein each signed one of more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ.
Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions including renewals before the FISC are classified.
As such, the public's confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court's ability to hold the government to the highest standard, particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens.
However, the FISC's rigor in protecting the rights of Americans, which is reinforced by 90-day renewals of surveillance orders, is necessarily dependent on the government's production to the court of all materials and relevant facts.
This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government.
In the case of Carter Page, the government had at least four independent opportunities before the FISC to accurately provide an accounting of the relevant facts.
However, our findings indicate that, as described below, material and relevant information was omitted.
Number one, the dossier compiled by Christopher Steele on behalf of the Democratic National Committee And the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application.
Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign via the law firm Perkins Coie and the research firm Fusion GPS to obtain the auditory information on Donald Trump's ties to Russia.
A. Neither the initial application in October 2016 nor any of the renewals Disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party campaign in funding Steele's efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.
B. The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named US person, but does not name Fusion GPS and Principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by US law firm, Parkins Koi, representing the DNC, even though it was known by DOJ at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier.
The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of, and paid by, the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.
Number two, the Carter Page FISA application also cited extensively a September 23rd, 2016 Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, which focuses on Page's July 2016 trip to Moscow.
This article does not collaborate the Steele dossier because it is derived from information leaked by Steele himself to Yahoo News.
The Page FISA application incorrectly assesses that Steele did not directly provide information to Yahoo News.
Steele has admitted in British court filings that he met with Yahoo News and several other outlets in September 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS. Perkins Coie was aware of Steele's initial media contacts because they hosted at least one meeting in Washington, D.C. in 2016 with Steele and Fusion GPS where this matter was discussed.
A. Steele was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations.
An unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI in an October 30th, 2016 Mother Jones article by David Corn.
Steele should have been terminated for his previous undisclosed contact with Yahoo and other outlets in September.
Before the page application was submitted to the FISC in October, but Steele improperly concealed from and lied to the FBI about those contacts.
B. Steele's numerous encounters with the media violated the cardinal rule of source handling, maintaining confidentiality, and demonstrated that Steele had become a less than reliable source for the FBI. 3. Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein.
Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Orr, documenting his communications with Steele.
For example, in September 2016, Steele admitted to Orr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.
This clear evidence of Steele's bias was recorded by Orr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files, but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications.
A. During the same time period, Orr's wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump.
Orr later provided the FBI with all of his wife's opposition research paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. Orr's relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the According to the head of the FBI's Counterintelligence Division, Assistant Director Bill Priesta, collaboration with the Steele dossier was in its, quote, infancy at the time of the initial PAGE visa application.
After Steele was terminated, a source validation report conducted by an independent unit within FBI assessed Steele's reporting as only minimally collaborated.
Yet, in early January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary of the Steele dossier, even though he was, according to his June 2017 testimony, quote, salacious and unvertified.
While the FISA application relied on Steele's past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti- Furthermore, Deputy Director McCabe testified before the committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.
Number five, the Page VISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papalopoulos.
But there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos.
Papadopoulos' information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Peter Strzok.
Strzok was reassigned by the special counsel's office to FBI Human Resources for improper text messages with his mistress, FBI attorney Lisa Page, no known relation to Carter Page, where they both demonstrated a clear bias against Trump and in favor of Clinton.
Who Strzok had also investigated.
Destruct Lisa Page texts also reflect extensive discussions about the investigation, orchestrating leaks to the media, and include a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss a quote "insurance policy against President Trump's election."
"I want to tell you about an exciting new product we have available at Infowarsstore.com." And this is basically a product that I've been taking anyway before we even launched our own version of it.
Now, the product is Body's Whole Body Support.
This is available right now at a massive 50% discount at Infowarsstore.com.
It's the ultimate turmeric and inflammatory support product on the market.
It's got the black pepper, which makes for optimal absorption to help boost and support your flexibility and mobility.
Joint function, immune system, and so much more.
Now, we're not even including a lot of the benefits that this product has been scientifically proven to have.
So I just got this fresh today.
Literally, the seal's not even being opened on it.
It's just $29.95.
Again, big, big, chunky bottle.
120 capsules in this bottle.
It is bodies.
The ultimate turmeric and inflammatory support product on the market, available right now at infowarsstore.com.
Export Selection