Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 23, 2018 - InfoWars Special Reports

01:50:05

FISA Memo Details Abuse By Obama Administration Cronies

Source

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Alex Jones.
	There's a lot of controversy around this network about Alex Jones.
	Google is being accused of hiding negative stories about Hillary and her campaign by changing its algorithm to bury stories like the Clinton body count story.
	That's according to website Infowars.
	It sounds like it's confirmed there are at least two shooters with fully automatic weapons.
	Dr. Martin Luther King has been shot to death in Memphis, Tennessee.
	JFK was shot from the back and the front.
	It was almost as if it were a planned implosion.
	It just pancaged.
	I think this is a national security imperative.
	We have clear things that we do not understand how they work operating in areas.
	That we can't control.
	UFOs.
	Is this global governance at last?
	Is it one world?
	The central bank is in charge.
	Israel claims the attack was accidental, but some former U.S. naval officers say it was on purpose.
	They describe the day's action as part of a continuing cover.
	Russian intelligence compiled a dossier on Mr. Trump during visits to Moscow.
	Russian scum!
	Denied everything.
	He called it all fake news.
	And he accused CNN of being fake news.
	This is a national emergency.
	If they killed Trump or removed Trump, it will cause a massive civil war in this country.
	This is a female high level of it.
	We are at war with Russia.
	Are you aware that Mr. Stone also stated publicly that he was in direct communication with Julian Assange and WikiLeaks?
	The White House and the President are citing InfoWars.
	When I say my body, my choice for a vaccine, I'm the crazy person.
	Infowars.com forward slash show.
	Well, we are in the middle of a special broadcast here at Infowars.com because we have just gotten the what used to be top secret United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court document.
	What I believe is 100% alleging to the activities as far as spying on Trump's campaign team.
	And the acquisition and then authorization or certification of the dirty dossier, the dossier, the P-Gate dossier that everybody is so familiar with.
	Welcome to this special broadcast, Owen Schroyer, Rob Dew with you.
	I apologize, I'm tweeting out the link right now to everybody.
	Yeah, we're running from the seat of our pants here.
	I can barely talk because I was yelling at protesters all weekend, but regardless, this is big news.
	Now here's, I want to make...
	Clarify things here for the audience real quick.
	The documents, excuse me, just bear with me, the documents that we're going to be reviewing here today are legal proceedings and a map, if you will, as to how the government bureaucracies ascertained, certified And then used what I believe is the Trump-Russia dossier.
	Now, the redactions in this probably will never allow us to confirm that.
	But based on the terminology, based on the times and the dates and what they're saying, that is all that I can reason.
	Now, this though is not going to mention anybody by name.
	This isn't going to...
	Assert that anyone or any individual or even any bureaucracy did anything necessarily illegal.
	But what this is, is the damn breaking.
	Because this gives us the dates, this gives us the names of the agencies, and the procedures as to what happened with the Trump-Russia dossier.
	Which again, we can only assume that's what this is based on the timing.
	But because of the redactions, we can't confirm it.
	So here's the deal.
	Well, there's a lot here to unpack, too.
	I've only made it through 14 pages, but I've seen enough in the first 14 that I think we can make sense of.
	It is 99 pages long.
	It looks like it was filed April 26, 2017. William Benny sent this to us, and it was posted on a national defense website.
	And from what he says, it came out today.
	So this just got released.
	And the Devin Nunes memo, I think, is a boil down of this.
	Well, I think that the Nunes memo is going to have the names.
	It's going to have names.
	And I think what Nunes has been doing, and to be honest with you, if you remember at the beginning of this, Nunes was actually very skeptical.
	And probably you would have assumed fell on the anti-Trump side of things and kind of bought the whole Russia stuff.
	And then I think once he actually did...
	Once he saw what was going on.
	And then he was like, oh...
	I better recuse myself and work behind the scenes.
	Which is interesting.
	You have...
	Also, it came out yesterday, Trey Gowdy was talking about the secret society that the FBI has within it.
	Where they were discussing how they were going to basically overthrow the Trump administration.
	And what did Newt Gingrich say?
	Trump is not a member of the secret society.
	That's why they're coming after him.
	There you go.
	So it's all coming together.
	Newt's been to Bohemian Grove, I believe.
	I think there's pictures of him at Bohemian Grove.
	Well, I think, though, that Nunes got smart and got wise.
	I don't think they're talking about Bohemian Grove.
	And he decided to start taking notes and documenting everything because it was so extreme.
	And so if Nunes' memo gets out, that, I think, will put the names on the faces.
	The Obamas, the Clintons, the Peter Strokes, etc.
	And if you're, you know, Alex Jones right now is breaking all this down on William Benny.
	So you could switch over to the other stream.
	We're going to have multiple streams going right now.
	This is the way we do it in the new media.
	Yeah, we're the media now.
	Exactly.
	So we're going to go through this page by page up until probably War Room and then maybe even into War Room a little bit.
	We'll keep working on this, which starts at 3 p.m.
	Central.
	But William Benny was on, Alex Jones showing, we'll get a clip of this coming up in a bit, talking about how what is in here verifies everything in paper that he's been saying.
	And he talked about these upstream, there's...
	The term upstream is in this document.
	I think it's on page 8 or 9. We need to find that.
	Because upstream has to do with Fairview and these other systems that they created, that the NSA created, to basically grab everything that we do, the metadata, everything, pretend it's not a big deal, and basically spy on Americans.
	So then when they have somebody, a target that they want to go after, they can start doing keyword searches on people and really dial in what these people are doing and how they can go after them.
	They're finding their weaknesses, essentially.
	So it literally is what is in this.
	So I guess let's just start breaking it.
	I just got to say something real quick.
	Someone in the crew, guys, I already feel my voice start going.
	So if I could just have someone making sure I got plenty of green tea, I know I'm sounding like kind of a sissy boy up here, but...
	But honestly, my voice is already starting to go.
	But we do have, and we played this, I played this on Friday, I played this yesterday, you've got Adam Schiff saying there's nothing to see, you've got Chris Cuomo saying there's nothing to see.
	Well, you know Adam Schiff, he broke the agreement in the hearing when it came to Steve Bannon.
	Did you hear about that?
	No, what did he do?
	So the House Intelligence Committee and these Judiciary Committees agreed to the scope of questioning as far as when they were interviewing Bannon.
	And they all agreed that they would only ask Bannon about the election.
	So anything after the election, you know, the book, nonsense like that, please don't bring that here.
	We don't want it.
	Well, guess who?
	Of course he went there.
	Adam Schiff went there immediately.
	So let's just break down some of the stuff that we have in this document.
	Again, I'm not a lawyer.
	I'm going to be joined by a lawyer on the war room.
	I did actually work for a lawyer for four years who taught me a little bit of stuff so that I can understand it better.
	So I'm just going to give you my breakdown of what I've read through so far.
	So on page two, you have the government's request for approval of the certifications and procedures accompanying the September 26, 2016 submission.
	So what is this?
	Why did I highlight this?
	Well, this date is very important.
	September 26, 2016. Submission.
	What is the submission?
	Well, we can only reason and assume that that is the dossier.
	That is the dirty dossier.
	And the timing makes sense based on what we know about the dossier.
	So they submit that to the FISA court September 26th.
	September 26, 2016, this document is going over the certifications and procedures that came along with that submission, and what we're going to find out is perhaps some of those things were not followed by law.
	Still on page two.
	The September 26, 2016 submission included blank, so that's just probably a number, certifications that were executed by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence.
	Now, this is why it's key.
	And actually, this is where we'll actually need some help from the crew.
	So, who was the Attorney General on September 26, 2016?
	Eric Holder.
	Who was the Director of National Intelligence on September 26, 2016?
	Well, that's what I'm saying.
	That's why I need a crew to actually...
	It might have been Loretta Lynch.
	It might have been Lynch.
	So, exactly.
	I'm sorry.
	So, that's why I want to make sure that we have the crew here fact-checking these things.
	So I believe you're right.
	I do believe that that was Loretta Lynch who had the illegal tarmac meeting, which would make sense that she would have had that meeting if she did perhaps not go through the exact certifications needed.
	She was out April 27, 2015, so she would not have been in then.
	So we need to find out who the Attorney General was on September 26, 2016, and who the Director of National Intelligence was on September 26, 2016, and we can put those names in there for ourselves.
	But I go on.
	Still on page two.
	So, the September 26, 2016 submission included blank redacted number of certifications that were executed by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence and was accompanied by the supporting affidavits of the Director of National Security Agency, which I believe was Admiral Rogers.
	I'm wrong.
	That's when she went in office.
	Okay, so it was Lynch.
	Yeah, it was Lynch.
	All right, so we'll just put her name right here then.
	Loretta.
	Lynch, who had the illegal tarmac meeting, and then see who the DNI was.
	So then you have, this was accompanied by the supporting affidavits of the director of the National Security Agency, I believe that's Admiral Rogers, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, I believe that's James Comey, and the director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
	I can't think of who that would have been at the top of my head at the time, but this is all during Obama's administration.
	That would have been Clapper.
	Clapper was the DNI. James Clapper.
	Okay, then.
	And this is all under Obama, folks.
	That's the key here.
	And all of these people are going to be indicted in this.
	And I think that that's why Admiral Mike Rogers of the NSA allegedly went to President Trump when he became privy to all this, told him he was being illegally spied on, and Trump moved his activities to his offices in New Jersey and out of Trump Tower.
	We already had those reports and we already had that broken down.
	So now we're just putting the pieces together.
	And the director of the National Counterterrorism Center.
	So there's another name we have to identify.
	Okay.
	Now moving on to page three.
	So this is just the dam breaking.
	This is just a legal blueprint for everything that's probably going to come out in the Nunes memo.
	For everything Ron Paul hates, essentially.
	I mean, that's an easy way to break it down.
	Something like that.
	And what any patriot should hate.
	Right.
	Page 3. The September 26, 2016 submission also included an explanatory memorandum prepared by the Department of Justice.
	Oh.
	Well, that's interesting because the Department of Justice had Bruce Ohr inside it.
	Of course, Bruce Ohr was married to Nellie Ohr, who of course was working for Fusion GPS and communicating with unknown...
	Numbers of anyone or anyone.
	Uncover your incestuous graph right there so people can see it.
	We're going to get to this later here.
	So now all of a sudden you could have a potential situation where the Department of Justice is forging memorandums in order to get these things certified.
	That is going to be key right there.
	That is so key if that turns out to be the case.
	Especially considering the collusion between Obama, the DOJ with Bruce Ohr, and Nellie Ohr and Fusion GPS, who I think Fusion GPS is running scared right now.
	They don't know what to do.
	We go on.
	We're still on page three.
	The court was required to complete its review of the initial 2006 certification within 30 days, i.e.
	by October 26, 2016. Now, why is this key?
	And I'd have to double check my dates.
	But I do believe that this is either right before or right after a major WikiLeaks release.
	And so to me, knowing the law and understanding they had to have 30 days in, they wanted to get this out in time before the election and before they thought WikiLeaks was about to drop their October surprise.
	That is also key.
	So we now move on to page 4. There's a lot here.
	On October 24, 2016, the government orally apprised the Court of Significant Noncompliance with the NSA's minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers.
	Now, this is a legal term I had to clarify before.
	Minimization is basically like when they do these huge dragnet surveillance things, or let's say they spy on Trump for 24 hours.
	And let's say there's only one conversation that they got from that 24 hours that they deem worthy of actually keeping as data.
	That's the minimization process.
	So everything else, so let's say 23 hours of Trump conversations goes away, they shouldn't have access to it, they don't keep it.
	And that one hour that they deem interesting, they do keep that.
	That's considered the minimization procedure, the minimization process.
	The full scope of non-compliant querying practices has not been previously disclosed to the court.
	Well, that's interesting.
	On the day the court otherwise would have had to complete its review of the certifications and procedures, the government made a written submission regarding those compliance problems.
	So now they're admitting, and now we're getting a step further where they're admitting they actually probably did not follow the law here.
	Supplemental notice of compliance incidents regarding the query of Section 702 acquired data.
	Boom.
	Acquired data.
	Is that the dossier?
	Is that them spying on President Trump?
	What is the acquired data?
	I believe it's one of those two things.
	The government reported that it was working to ascertain the causes of those compliance problems and develop a remedial plan to address them.
	So again, they're saying here, there was a problem with the compliance and there was a problem with how they went about it as to following some of these laws here, some of these compliance laws.
	Without further information about the compliance problems and the government's remedial efforts, The court was not in a position to access whether the minimization procedures accompanying the 2016 certifications would comply with the statutory standards and were consistent with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment.
	So basically that's to me saying they were spying on President Trump and instead of going through the minimization procedures to only keep data that was relevant to whatever inquiry that you had requested, they just kept all of it.
	They just kept all of it.
	They kept all of the communications that they had acquired.
	They kept all the recordings, all the spying.
	They kept all of it.
	They did not follow the minimization procedures.
	Now, why would they do that?
	You can only guess.
	And it also mentions the Fourth Amendment in here, of course, the right to privacy.
	So why wouldn't they disclose that?
	Is that because they knew that the dossier was fake?
	Hmm.
	All right, we're now on to page five.
	On January 3rd, 2017, this is still Obama, the government made a further submission describing its efforts to ascertain the scope and causes of these compliance problems and discussing potential solutions to them.
	So still under the Obama administration, they're getting hit back from the court.
	The court's saying, you did not follow the correct law here when it comes to compliance, and why did you not do that?
	So then the Obama administration is saying, well, let's discuss solutions to this problem.
	The court was not satisfied that the government had sufficiently asserted the scope of the compliance problems or developed and implemented adequate solutions for them and communicated a number of questions and concerns to the government.
	So now is the part where they're starting to talk about some of these compliance issues.
	Thank you, sir.
	And they're saying, why didn't you go through the correct minimization process?
	Why did you not follow the law when it comes to getting this through the FISA court?
	And it's just starting here.
	The government submitted another update on January 27, 2017.
	Boom.
	Now we are in the Trump administration in which it informed the court that due to the complexity of the issues involved, NSA would not be in a position to provide thorough responses to the court's questions and concerns by January 30th.
	Now why is the January 31st date so significant?
	That's because...
	That's basically them saying, under the Obama administration, they did their quote-unquote investigation or looking into this, and what they discovered was they didn't do an adequate job, and they failed.
	And so now the NSA, and I think Mike Rogers, Admiral Rogers, became a patriot at this point, and he said, okay, we need to extend the, essentially, investigation into this through the FISA court.
	And I think that that's when the real investigation started, was after January 27th when they extended the date on January 31st.
	So then, final comment here from page 5. The government submitted that a further extension through May 26th, 2017 was necessary for it to address those issues and that such extension would be consistent with national security.
	The court granted a shorter extension through April 28th, 2017. This document came out April 26th.
	But again, the Obama government wanted this investigation, if you want to call it that, shut down on January 31st.
	Again, I'm trying to put names to the names that aren't in here.
	I believe it's Admiral Mike Rogers, but that could be inaccurate.
	However, the NSA... I was actually looking up the upstream stuff, which is coming up later in this document.
	But right now, you seem to be doing a very thorough breakdown of this.
	And I mean, this literally is...
	It's a blueprint.
	It's the backstory.
	It's all the stuff that happened behind the scenes in this written in really dry, horrible legalese.
	Of course, all the good parts, of course, are redacted.
	Well, I've got to be honest, though.
	The redactions are going to be strange, and there was really only a couple of redactions that really stuck out to me.
	As far as major redactions are concerned, I mean, there's...
	And I only fit 14 pages into this.
	There weren't, like, too many major redactions where you had whole pages redacted.
	I mean, I just went through the first five pages, and page six is the first time where you see a paragraph.
	It's a major redaction.
	Yeah, so I don't know what that's about.
	If anything, I think that's probably to protect the patriots that are getting behind this.
	That would be my guess.
	Because they don't want them to know.
	Who's working in what departments to actually find out the truth about the FISA warrant that the Obama administration used to spy on Donald Trump?
	Exactly.
	And people are saying in the comments, the memo is only four pages.
	Yes, we know that.
	This isn't the memo.
	This is what the memo...
	The memo is a breakdown of what this is.
	And it's going to name names.
	And everything that we've been covering.
	Yes.
	And this.
	It proves basically everything they were trying to...
	Destroy the Trump administration through this electronic surveillance.
	Is all these names and these dots connected.
	But it breaks into stuff we've been talking about for years.
	All the Bill Benny stuff, the Thomas Drake stuff, just how they basically have taps running into everything, which is probably why your internet runs so slow, because everything has to go through them before they let it go on.
	And the NSA is collecting everything.
	It's a giant dragnet.
	They're going after all American citizens.
	I think it's Section 702 is what Trump just reauthorized.
	And I'm sure people went and told him, sir, we need this to keep us safe.
	I think stuff like this needs to be dismantled.
	I don't think this is keeping us safe.
	What terrorists have they stopped using the NSA? They've only gone after the fact and said, oh, we caught these people later, or we were able to build a case against them later.
	It is a separate issue, but there have been some cases where the FBI has thwarted major terrorist attacks in California and New York City.
	But regardless, I do believe, I think everybody agrees that it's a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
	But yes, the Trump administration did just extend that violation in the eyes of many patriots.
	So let's get back to the document, though.
	We're on page six.
	The March 30th, 2017 submission included the 2017 amendments.
	That is the So what is
	that saying?
	I believe that that's saying, in the original certifications, they deemed that the minimization procedures were going to be minimal, aka, we're going to keep everything.
	Then, in 2017, when they redid that query, if you will, it was Admiral Mike Rogers, when they redid that query into those 2016 certifications, they decided that, no, in fact, you did not follow the correct procedures for minimization.
	That submission also included an explanatory memorandum prepared by the DOJ. Now, whose DOJ was that?
	Was that Obama's DOJ or Trump's DOJ? Based on the dates, I think that that would actually be Trump's DOJ, and that is why they included an explanatory memorandum of their own.
	Which is being run by holdovers of the Obama administration, which Jeff Sessions recused himself on, and this has to do with Russian collusion.
	So Jeff Sessions isn't even in the loop on half of this stuff.
	And Sessions got questioned by Mueller.
	I think that was today.
	Today, yeah.
	All right, still on page six.
	Each of the 2016 certifications involves, quote, the targeting of non-United States persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States to acquire foreign intelligence information, end quote.
	Unless you're Donald Trump.
	Well, this is the key.
	So that's the first paragraph.
	Which is that and the next page.
	That they redact.
	So it's literally two paragraphs being redacted.
	So to me, that's...
	Again, you have to understand this.
	The 2016 certifications are different now than the 2017 amendments.
	So basically, if they determined in 2016 that these certifications were legit, the NSA and...
	I guess the DOJ and the like came back with the 2017 amendments and I guess looked at these certifications and said, well, I'm not so sure that that was legit.
	And I think that that's what's about to be blown out of the water.
	So you got that going on.
	There's your first major redaction right there.
	Now we jump to page eight.
	And this is when they're reviewing the compliance issues that happened under the Obama administration.
	The court held a hearing October 4, 2016, to address certain issues raised by the September 26, 2016 submission, as well as certain compliance issues regarding the government's collection and handling of information under prior certifications.
	Now, what was that hearing on October 4?
	October 4 was, I think, the day WikiLeaks got released.
	Are you guys fact-checking this while we're going?
	Type in October 4th WikiLeaks.
	I think that's the day.
	It might have been the 7th.
	I think it was that week, though.
	But it was right around that time.
	The Trump grab-em tape got issued, and then the WikiLeaks Podesta emails came out.
	Yeah, and this was all going on.
	It was all early October.
	Right around the same time period.
	So, again, they're looking at the compliance issues regarding the original certifications to get the FISA warrant.
	And then they held a further hearing on October 26th to address matters raised in the hearing.
	Wiki was October 6th.
	I've got a fact checker on right now who's sending me texts.
	So another important thing to find out here is what was the October 4th hearing and what was the October 26th hearing?
	Because...
	I mean, usually with this stuff, I'm really good at combing through my memory and recalling it, but I'm guessing that we never covered this because we were covering the election.
	Nope, she's saying the fourth.
	Is when the WikiLeaks came out?
	Yeah, so they're having that and trying to probably collate that with whatever else is going on.
	And then try to use that as their reasoning for saying, oh, it's Trump colluding with the WikiLeaks and the Russians.
	This proves Russian collusion because how did they get these emails?
	How did WikiLeaks get these emails?
	It has to be the Russians.
	Because the Russians have dirt on Trump with the Pissgate dossier.
	So all that's got to be reviewed, and that's what this document is talking about.
	But the question is, and again, I don't remember us covering this because we were so tied up in the election and everything that was going on in the WikiLeaks.
	What was the October 4th, 2016 hearing, and what was the October 26th, 2016 hearing?
	Those are going to be keys.
	Grab my laptop so I can type these things in.
	I cannot do this on my phone.
	You want to just go do that while I keep reading?
	You keep reading.
	Okay, so dude's going to go grab his laptop.
	All right, I'm on page 10 now.
	Now, this is the first redaction to me inside a sentence that really begs questioning.
	The court...
	Therefore finds that redaction contain all required statutory elements.
	So now we don't know whether that's the 2016 certifications or the 2017 amendments.
	Why would that be redacted?
	Again, unless to protect the patriots.
	Who are actually trying to work through all of this.
	But again, I'm not sure why redacting that to the public really works to that.
	But that to me is the first thing that kind of screams out and really puts a big question.
	Because again, the court therefore finds that redacted contained all required statutory elements.
	That's the FISA court.
	Are they confirming the 2016 certifications?
	or are they confirming the 2017 amendments?
	Similarly, the court has reviewed the certifications to the prior 702 dockets as amended by the 2016 certifications and finds that they also contain all the elements required by the statute.
	So to me, that means that this redaction probably is most likely the 2017 amendments to the 2016 certification.
	Now, I know that this is all very confusing.
	And very convoluted.
	And I'm not the legal expert.
	I'm going to be joined by a lawyer on the War Room, and we'll get more into this.
	And actually, I just noticed this footnote down here.
	Admiral Mike Rogers, Director NSA. So that confirms that.
	James Comey, Director FBI. That confirms that.
	John Brennan, Director CIA. That confirms that.
	Nicholas Rasmussen, Director NCTC. That confirms that.
	Admiral Rogers filed amended affidavits in connection with the March 30, 2017 submission.
	That, of course, is the amended one to that.
	Okay, so that confirms all of those names and what we thought about that.
	Okay.
	Now we're on to page 11 here.
	And I have a quick breakdown.
	So on the 4th was the first WikiLeaks dub, but it wasn't a lot.
	And then Access Hollywood was October 7th, and then more dropped on October 13th in terms of what the different batches that they put out, because they were putting out different batches of stuff.
	I remember, I think Spirit Cooking might have been October 4th.
	Let me look that up.
	Yeah, I think that that's right.
	And that's interesting, too, because since they essentially had those two hearings, think about how different those two hearings would have been after the WikiLeaks releases.
	Because that would have been fuel for the Obama-ites to say, hey, Trump is colluding with Russia, WikiLeaks is colluding with Russia.
	I was a month off.
	I knew it was November 4th.
	Was the spirit cooking?
	That's wild.
	That is wild.
	It's just interesting seeing the last two years of all the news we've been covering kind of be collated in this one document.
	And just trying to hash it all together.
	It literally is the backstory.
	What was going on while people were speculating and writing reports and doing articles and the mainstream media running around talking about issues of no significance.
	This is what was really going on during that time.
	And there's the affidavits.
	So here we are on page 11 now.
	The court is also required pursuant to 50 U.S. Code 1881, yada, yada, yada.
	To review the targeting and minimization procedures to determine whether they are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S. Code, yada, yada, yada.
	Court further assesses whether the targeting and minimization procedures are consistent with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment.
	Now, that is key because what is this insinuating?
	Did they or did they not illegally spy on President Trump and his campaign team?
	And, of course, we believe the answer is affirmatively absolutely they did.
	Under the procedures adopted by the government, NSA is the lead agency in making targeting decisions under 702. Now, this is also key.
	Because again, we theorize that it's Mike Rogers that told President Trump he was being spied on before anyone else.
	And that's why Trump moved his campaign headquarters outside of Trump Tower momentarily, because he found that out from Admiral Rogers.
	And you know what?
	Can you pull up the original Trump tweet when he says, I just discovered that I was being spied on?
	Wiretapping?
	Yeah.
	The original where he said wiretapping?
	Yes, yes, yes.
	Because we already did the BACS check because there was a confirmed meeting with President Trump and Admiral Rogers, and then President Trump moved his campaign headquarters that weekend to New Jersey outside of Trump Tower.
	March 4th.
	And when was this?
	March 17th?
	No, no, no.
	This would have been before that, is my guess.
	This probably would have been...
	There was something that happened in March back in the beginning of this.
	March 30th.
	That was an extension of essentially a certification process.
	So that date was really just an...
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	So I'm wondering if that tweet...
	Terrible.
	Just found out Obama had my wire tapped in Trump Tower.
	Look at what time he tweets this out.
	Yeah, 3.35 a.m.
	And he also has a typo in it.
	Had my wires tapped.
	Okay, not really.
	Had my wires tapped in Trump Tower just before the victory.
	Nothing found.
	This is McCarthyism.
	3.35 a.m.
	Donald Trump lurking around Trump Tower.
	Pissed off.
	I'm wondering if he really did just find that out then or if he just decided to tweet that he found it out then.
	So we'll have to continue to look into that, but again, Mike Rogers has a meeting with President Trump, and then all of a sudden President Trump moves his campaign headquarters because he was probably told he was being spied on.
	That's my guess.
	Alright, so that does it, and like I said, I got all the way through page 14, and that's all my highlights.
	So, I mean, we can keep going here.
	I don't know if you want me to read all this legal mumbo-jumbo on the air, because it's 100 pages long here.
	Let me see.
	Yeah.
	A hundred pages long.
	So he moved his campaign headquarters, looks like September 23rd, 2016. And when was the original submission?
	Let's pull it back up.
	This is Herald Tribune, Trump moving Florida campaign.
	This is a Florida campaign headquarters out of Sarasota.
	And when was the initial submission?
	September 26th.
	He moved on the 23rd, three days before.
	And of course, Admiral Rogers would have been privy to the fact that they were about to start spying.
	Sure.
	And then three days later, they do.
	So Admiral Rogers could be a major patriot.
	But he probably didn't think they could get to Trump Tower.
	I mean, you're looking at a situation here, though, where Admiral Rogers could be such a huge patriot, we don't even really know it.
	If this is true, if our theories are true, That as soon as Rogers became privy to all this, he decided to tell Trump.
	Which, you know, if you think about it, it's so genius.
	Because if you're Rogers, you have to feel like you're in a very compromising position with all of this deep state going on.
	And you feel like you don't want to burn yourself by trying to fight against them.
	So instead, you just say, I can't really win this battle now.
	I'm in it too deep.
	There's too many people against me.
	They're going to push this forward.
	So since I know this is going on, maybe I'll just go tell Trump, and I'll let him know, and then he can decide how he wants to handle it going forward, and that way I kind of give myself a little bit of an out, even though my name is going to be attached to all this, because I told him it was all coming out.
	I'm not going to be the one that ends up having to go down with this sinking ship here.
	Now, bottom of page 11, going into page 12. Under the procedures adopted by the government, the NSA is the lead agency making targeting decisions under Section 702. Exactly.
	So it all had to go through Rogers.
	All of it.
	Pursuant to its targeting procedures, NSA may target acquisition for a particular selector, which is typically a facility such as a telephone number or email address.
	The FBI targeting procedures come into play in cases where, blank, that has been tasked under the NSA targeting procedures.
	Well, and what document did you...
	So the NSA communicates to the FBI on who they need to start targeting.
	And see the FBI targeting procedures I-1.
	I think it's actually the reverse.
	You think it's the reverse?
	Does the FBI targeting procedures apply in addition to the NSA targeting procedures?
	I think the FBI have to clear it with the NSA first.
	Because the NSA has that access.
	Oh yeah, well they're going to get it from the NSA. Right.
	And what did our own Dr. Jerry Corsi come out with?
	I think that actual list of the telephone numbers that included not only numbers of Alex Jones.
	Which had to do with the birth certificate.
	But also, of course, Trump and his private lines.
	Yep.
	Which would have made sense if those were the lines that they were, quote-unquote, wiretapping.
	Here's their definition of minimization procedures.
	As pertinent part as...
	Specific procedures which shall be adopted by the Attorney General that are reasonably designed in light of the purpose and technique of the particular surveillance or physical search to minimize the acquisition and retention and prohibit the dissemination of non-publicly available information concerning unconsenting United States persons consistent with the need of the United States to obtain, produce, and disseminate foreign intelligence information.
	I think this is why they mask these names out.
	The minimization might have to do with the masking and the unmasking.
	And the minimization is obviously what they didn't comply with, because to me that seems to be the biggest issue here that they're going to get caught up on, where they're going to say, why did you go through Paul Manafort's private records?
	It had nothing to do with the presidential campaign.
	Why were you going through private conversations with Mike Flynn or Greg Papadopoulos that had nothing to do with Russia?
	And the presidential campaign.
	Why are you trying to go after them for issues that didn't involve Trump's campaign at all?
	That's what's in violation of this Minimization Act.
	And that's why I think that Paul Manafort probably determining or whatever we find out about this whole document as well as whatever memos get released in the future, he could win that lawsuit.
	And let's just recap this document right here.
	This is a FISA. Court document dated April 26, 2017. William Benny sent it to us this morning.
	He said he found it on the Director of National Intelligence's website.
	And it is heavily, well, I wouldn't say heavily redacted.
	It's not the heaviest redactions we've ever seen.
	But it is redacted.
	I think all the good key information.
	And what we are saying is that...
	Devin Nunez has a four-page memo, which we believe is a summary of what is going on in this.
	Because you look at the dates, where they match up with dates that happened in the news, and things start to come together.
	Here's another definition.
	Foreign intelligence information, this is what they define it as, information that relates to and if concerning a United States person is necessary to the ability of the United States to protect.
	A. An actual or potential attack or other grave hostile acts of a foreign power or agent of a foreign power, Russian collusion, sabotage, international terrorism, and the international proliferation of procedures that require non-publicly available information,
	And this is how they were jumping around to unmask these names, Susan Rice and others.
	And maybe Samantha Powers.
	Notwithstanding paragraphs one and two, procedures that allow for the retention and dissemination of information that is evidence of a crime which has been, is being, or is about to be committed, and that is to be retained or disseminated for law enforcement purposes. .
	And unminimized information obtained under Section 702 is governed by its own set of laws, which is, let's see, 15. This opinion uses the term raw and unminimized interchangeably.
	The purpose, the proposed NCTC minimization procedures designed...
	So that's basically saying you can't even evaluate whatever it is you're obtaining until it's gone through that minimization process.
	And that's part of the law and part of the Fourth Amendment, basically, is what that's saying.
	And I guess what we would believe is that they didn't follow that procedure and they just used everything and anything.
	I guess probably Robert Mueller's team used anything and everything before going through a minimization process just so they could find a crooked toenail on anyone and everyone inside Trump's campaign.
	Of course.
	If you follow anyone around, you'll be able to find something.
	They say, I think the average person...
	Look up what the average person...
	How many laws the average person breaks per day just walking around?
	Because that's...
	It basically does that.
	Or driving.
	Let me make a real quick point during breaks here.
	Yeah.
	You know, we knew they'd wait till Media Matters or...
	Right-wing watch, same group, Soros Fund, it came out with their talking point.
	And I hadn't predicted it first hour.
	This is the full body of the document versus 10% of the sex size.
	Nunes and them have the excise classified parts.
	That's what they're saying is even worse.
	But this is the document.
	They're spinning it.
	Oh, it's been out for months.
	No, it hasn't.
	It has earlier dates on it.
	This was directed by high-level sources to Benny when he was on today.
	This showed up today on there.
	And the fact is, it's all bombshell.
	It's a real document.
	The media is trying to ignore the document, admitting illegal spying on citizens.
	People in the court saying this is illegal, trying to say, oh, well, Jones, this isn't a big deal.
	The point is, report on the document.
	I started the show out saying, I talked to sources, I know what's in the document.
	I hadn't seen it, and I guess they just decided to give it to me.
	Live time during the show, the decision was made.
	No, it was.
	And, in fact, let's go to the clip from earlier today with William Benny, with Alex Jones, really breaking down.
	What he says is in this memo and what it basically proves everything he's been saying and others have been saying for years about the dragnet that is going on in our country.
	You guys ready to roll that clip?
	Let's roll it.
	William Benny is our guest.
	He is the former technical leader of the intelligence with NSA before becoming a whistleblower in 2001 after more than 30 years of the agency.
	Benny's been described as one of the best analysts and codebreakers in NSA history.
	And again, he is the technical advisor for the film Snowden.
	It is so amazing.
	I think the best work that that particular director has put out, expose facts.org.
	A good American.org is a documentary that he endorses and is in.
	That breaks down this total surveillance grid.
	Now further confirmed, talking to Benny earlier who just joined us and then during the break, this is as big as the WikiLeaks revelations about illegal spying, but it ties into the Democrats spying on candidate Trump and president-elect, exactly what we knew from our sources.
	Again, this was published today.
	At the director of national intelligence website, William Benny, who's been advising the CIA director and others, let us know the minute it went out.
	So we are the first to break it and notice an hour plus later, no media coverage of this.
	They don't know what to do.
	This is the secret memo that's so troubling that ties into all the perjury and the cabal of Clinton operatives trying to set the president and others up using the might of the surveillance grid that's meant for foreign powers against the American people.
	This is...
	Beyond any Hollywood movie.
	So, Mr. Benny, you've got the floor for the rest of the hour.
	William Benny, start wherever you think is best.
	I'd like to start with some of the things they're talking about on page 15 of that ruling, where they talked about NSA having the authority to go in the upstream program and take down main communications trunks, because I think there's some terrorist or dope dealer on there.
	And they can capture and keep the entire trunk line, which means, like, if you have a 10-gigabit line like 64 fibers and you know there's a drug dealer in there internationally, I'll take down the whole line, or you think there's one there, you'll take in the whole line and capture all the data and keep it all and sort it and interrogate it.
	That's basically how NSA analysts are able to look at their lovers if they're cheating on them.
	That's how they can do that under that authority.
	But that's all done in secret.
	They do it there in their ruling.
	But this feeds right into doing that.
	They say they had two ways of doing those.
	Those who run the cables, basically, meaning AT&T. They own the cables, so they let them have access.
	And the other was the 702 program where they went to the service providers for the Internet or for the phone network.
	That also included AT&T. But this is the upstream program is the taps on the fiber lines where they take everything.
	And that's really what I was trying to say about President Trump when he was being targeted in all the data they were collecting, including his entire staff on his committee and everything.
	They were all being scooped up in this bulk acquisition off the fiber lines in the upstream program.
	And the main slide that would show it, if you could put it up, is the Fairview program.
	That is AT&T's tapping points inside the 48 states of the United States.
	And you notice all the tap points are distributed with...
	This is the one that no mainstream media wants to show on TV, because this is the one that calls out this business about they're only after foreigners.
	It's an obvious lie.
	I mean, if you looked at that slide, there are 11 points on that very few slide where the trans-oceanic cables surface on the coast of the United States.
	Now, that's where all foreign communications are coming into or going out of or transiting the U.S. Now, if they're only after foreigners, all they have to do is be at those 11 points.
	But the rest of the 80 points of distributed tap points go right across the U.S. with the population.
	That means we, the U.S. citizens, are the target, not foreigners.
	And that's the obvious lie.
	They've been trying to feed us for years.
	Wow, I don't want to interrupt.
	This is so bombshell, but this is confirming total dragnet of the entire Trump Organization campaign by the Democratic Party in control, unmasking.
	They've lied to Congress, saying it was only a few people.
	This is bombshell proof of perjury.
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	I mean, they've been lying to us in many different ways to the committees.
	They lie, you know, even within the intelligence communities, they lie to one another.
	It's all built on lies.
	Wow.
	Please continue.
	Well, the other point I'd like to make is that it's not just the Trump Organization.
	It's everybody in the country.
	We're all in that boat.
	That's how they could put leverage on any of the judges in the Supreme Court, or else federal judges anywhere, or members of Congress anywhere.
	Representative Gowdy is saying he's not aware of all this.
	Well, he should be, and he should be asking about that Fairview program and what are they doing at tap points across the United States, like in Kansas or Missouri or, you know, what are you tapping there?
	Well, it's not foreigners, I'll tell you that.
	Well, you're absolutely, as you said, they're dragnetting everybody instead of actually targeting terrorists and others, and it becomes a needle in a haystack, as you've documented and as you're advising the president now.
	But the big news is they did testify that they were not spying on the president or his family or any of this, which is a total lie.
	I've already had the DEA leak us documents where they were doing it, including my name in there and private phone numbers, so I know it's accurate, but this is absolutely incredible, and I don't know how the corporate media is going to ignore this, but then you see the Republicans being pressured not to release this memo they've had, shitting on it, because obviously they're getting pressured not to, but clearly this points towards the president who's authorized to release it through his director of national intelligence and decided to do so today.
	Yeah, I think that this is exposing all of this stuff and all this activity on all these agencies and all the political people involved in this.
	All this has to happen.
	We need to cleanse the house here.
	Otherwise, if we don't look back and fix the problems, we'll never fix them, and they'll just keep going.
	So unless you face what happened and deal with it and call people accountable, you're never going to correct any of these problems.
	Well, the president was critical of the FISA. He said, my hands are tied.
	They're ramming it through.
	He still signed it, obviously, because it was tied to so many intelligence operations, but he said he wants to fix it.
	This is, I think, a big message from the president declassifying this today and a little bird telling you about it so we could break it.
	But again, this is one of the biggest stories of my lifetime, and it's total silence right now that this is out.
	That's been my, like even the Russiagate, the mainstream media was pushing an agenda, not any factual evidence.
	And so I found them to be totally worthless.
	And they were actually, they should unsubscribe to the First Amendment as a part of the free press, because they're not free and they're not oppressed.
	They're not looking for the truth and being honest about any of it with any of us.
	So, you know, I just see that as a...
	Well, they didn't think about people like you and Mr. Drake and countless other FBI agents that have exposed what was going on.
	I mean, there have been a lot of good people.
	I know it's just your duty.
	You've done it, but you've been through a lot now to see all this coming out.
	Is there not some satisfaction there, Mr. Benning?
	I have to admit that I'm really glad that this is coming out in print and in official documents so that now we can clearly say, this is really what you've been doing.
	You cannot deny this.
	This is your documentation.
	This is what you're saying to us you've been doing.
	So it's not us accusing you.
	You now have to face up to the consequence of what you've done.
	Yeah, this really does lay out the groundwork of how they go about Surveilling everybody.
	And he mentioned page 15, which we're about to go to, the upstream collection of internet communications.
	And they talked also about 33 Thomas Street, which if you go back to The Intercept back in 2016, they published some unseen photos back from the 90s and even the 80s.
	And it's a windowless building on 33 Thomas Street used by AT&T to route communications across the world.
	Guys, go to The Intercept.
	It's in The Intercept.
	The 550-foot tower contains equipment that covertly monitors phone calls, faxes, and internet data according to documents.
	But with the exception of employees who have worked the building, few people have ever been allowed inside.
	So then they show pictures from the 90s, and you can see how the technology has changed.
	There's even like a load of disks and giant batteries in there.
	The title of the article is Look Inside the Windowless New York Size Scraper Linked to the NSA. And that's what it looks like.
	It's basically the Tower of Mordor, where they collect all this information.
	It's built to withstand a nuclear attack.
	And they basically use it to go after...
	And look, they use that as the dragnet area.
	So like you said, they're talking about trunks, which are giant areas that they have these switchboards in.
	And this was all put in under Kalia, which was another...
	Right before the Telecommunications Act, that was allowing law enforcement to go into these things and start monitoring people.
	That was like in the early 90s under Bill Clinton.
	But when they say, Trunk, oh, we think there's a drug dealer in this area, so we're going to tap everybody's line in that area, grab everything.
	So all they had to say is, hey, we think there's a drug dealer near Trump Tower or one in Trump Tower, which would allow them to go in and grab everything and do this.
	So here it is in the document.
	Upstream collection of internet communications refers to NSA's interception of such communications as they transit the facilities of internet backbone carrier, that's probably AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, as distinguished from acquiring communications from systems operated by internet service providers, blank, blank, and blank.
	Upstream internet connection constitutes a small percentage of NSA's overall collection of internet communications under Section 702, which is the dragnet.
	Noting at the time, upstream internet collection constitutes only 9%, but has represented more than its share of challenges in the implementing of Section 702. In 2011, the government disclosed that as part of its upstream collection of internet transactions, NSA required MCTs, or Multiple Communication Transactions.
	MCTs might take the form of blank, containing multiple email messages, blank, blank, blank.
	The term active user, which is probably in those blanks, refers to user of a communication service to and from the MCT in which the transit, when it is acquired, of a user's email account.
	So that, to me, the redactions are basically so that the people don't realize, yeah, they're spying on me.
	Yeah.
	Because that's what that is.
	Yeah, every internet provider, every email, they get it.
	And they get it.
	And they get it.
	They get it.
	They save it.
	And if they don't like what you're doing, they're going to put out whatever they want.
	Guys, bring up that article about how many laws the average person breaks every day.
	So when you say you have nothing to hide, I'm going to tell you you're full of it.
	Do we have that article?
	I think it was like over 400. Yeah.
	Decriminalize the average man.
	Can you now zoom that in a little bit?
	My old eyes can't see it.
	Three felonies a day.
	Three felonies a day.
	I think...
	There you go.
	I'm trying to think of what would be the felony that people would commit.
	Speeding, but unless you're like double the limit in a school zone, I don't think there's a felony there.
	Because I'm trying to think.
	I mean, I know.
	I definitely...
	Well, I won't say anything.
	Let's just say I think the speed limit should be however fast you can go until you hit the car in front of you.
	How very libertarian of you.
	Moreover, NSA's upstream collection acquired internet communications that were to, from, or about a selector task for acquisition under 702. Well, and real quick, guys, Rob, that story that you have pulled up, look inside the windowless New York skyscraper linked to the NSA, that is most likely the gathering.
	Of all the information we're going over here.
	Right.
	That story came out.
	Look at the day that story came out.
	You want to talk about timing?
	November 16th, 2016. Right after the election.
	Right in the middle of all of this going on.
	You wonder if somebody didn't decide to get that story out there from within.
	To let people know.
	To let people know what's going on.
	Who is it?
	I think, I don't know, this is Glenn Greenwald's website, but I guess these two guys, Ryan Gallagher.
	And Heinrich were given these photographs, which have never been seen before.
	No one's ever seen the inside of this building.
	So that has to be an insider source.
	I mean, just the giant battery packs.
	I mean, this thing is ready to withstand a nuclear war.
	The ground floor is added with a cafeteria, but it was never open for business.
	So no one's in this building.
	It's a building for no one.
	It's a building.
	The 1984 spy hub.
	It's literally Sauron's all-seeing eye.
	And if you look at it, it looks creepy as all heck.
	What was the movie where, at the end, oh man, Captain America, where they find out that in this basement is where everything is being run.
	There's no human there.
	There's no anything.
	There's just the consciousness of an old Nazi in the machine.
	And it's running this entire intelligence hub.
	That was the Winter Soldier.
	So we're on page 17 of this right now.
	Actually, I wanted to go over something real quick on page 16. Moreover, NSA Upstream Collection, which is collecting all this data that we are all using on the internet, email, etc., acquired internet communications that were to, from, or about a selector tasked for acquisition under Section 702. As a result, Upstream Collection could acquire an entire MCT. For which the active user, that's basically all your communication.
	Essentially, if we say MCT, that's basically all your communication.
	But we have no information on the Vegas shooter.
	Somehow.
	See how this works?
	Somehow.
	We don't have the text messages from the agents talking about their FBI secret society.
	But we have everything else.
	Don't worry.
	We have everything else.
	But we couldn't hold these text messages, and we don't know who this Vegas shooter was.
	Which I now believe...
	It's going to come out that he was working with the FBI. He was an FBI informant.
	That's what I'm saying.
	And he may have not even been the shooter.
	And he may not even have been the shooter.
	But I think that you're right about that.
	As a result, upstream collection could acquire an entire MCT for which the active user was a non-target.
	And that mostly pertained to non-targets merely because a single discrete communication within the MCT was to, from, or contained a reference to a task selector.
	Such acquisitions could take place even if the non-target active user was a U.S. person in the United States and the MCT contained a large number of domestic communications that did not pertain to the foreign intelligence target who used the task selector.
	You know, it goes on.
	But basically, what this means to me is that, okay.
	Let's say that they get a FISA warrant to spy on Donald Trump because they say Donald Trump is working with the Russians.
	We've got this dossier.
	We've got this or that.
	And so they say, okay, all right, here is your, here, go ahead and spy on him.
	And they say, okay, we'll spy on him.
	But then what do they do?
	They don't follow the minimization procedures.
	And they just take everything.
	They take all of his communications.
	They take all of his team's communications.
	They put all of that down.
	They comb through all of that instead of only focusing on who should have been the selector, which I guess would have been Donald Trump.
	I mean, I don't know for sure because they don't tell us.
	But whoever it was, whoever was the one that was the task selector who they were supposed to be monitoring, They went well beyond that reach.
	They went well beyond just spying on that and those communications and they took all of them.
	And that to me is what is really going to be damning about this memo.
	And again, here I'm on page 18. If the target is the active user, then it is reasonable to presume that all of the discrete communications within an MCT will be to or from the target.
	So again, who was that target?
	And then...
	How were they able to get all this intel on Manafort?
	Is Manafort sending 5,000 messages to Trump a day about everything he's ever done in his past?
	I doubt it.
	No.
	I doubt it.
	They're spying on everything, and that's how they got this, but they're doing it under one little sliver of the law that allows them to go after certain things, and they're just going, hey, we have everything anyway.
	We're just going to grab everything anyway, and then we're going to save it, and then we'll go through it and have people look through it and do keyword searches.
	And so under the Obama administration, they said, okay, yeah, this complies with the minimization procedures.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And then the NSA said, well, hold on a second.
	I want to extend the date to look at these minimization procedures because I think we need to relook into this.
	Trump's administration gets in, does look into it, and, well, this is what they find.
	No, you did not follow the correct minimization procedures.
	You broke the law.
	Look at this.
	This goes back to 2015, which was—was Trump running in January 2015?
	So a lot of this stuff, when they go back and reference, is more for legal purposes to say, this is when we wrote this law.
	This is when we made this decision.
	This is why we're referencing this here.
	Okay, right.
	Because the note is described on the results of the NSAIG report, which analyzed queries using a set of U.S. person identifiers, those associated with targets under Section 704 and 705, during the first three months of 2015 in a subset of particular NSA systems that contained the results of Internet upstream collection.
	The relatively narrow inquiry found that blank analysts had made blank separate queries using blank U.S. person identifiers that improperly ran This
	is big right here.
	Yeah.
	On the NSA's part and emphasize this is a very serious Fourth Amendment issue.
	I mean, you imagine the bombshells that were being dropped in October 2016?
	Finish this entire paragraph because it's key, too.
	No, you were on the right page.
	So October 2016, transcript at 5-6.
	That'll be interesting to see what that says.
	The court found...
	I was looking to see what's down there.
	The court found in light of recent revelations, it did not have sufficient information to assess whether the proposed minimization procedures accompanying the initial 2016 certifications would comply with statutory Fourth Amendment requirements as implemented.
	They broke the law.
	Exactly.
	That's the translation.
	And then there's supplemental notices on January 3rd, January 27th.
	In anticipation, the government updated the court on those querying issues.
	A separate OCO review limited many of...
	Many of the same ways as the IG studies in covering the periods of April through December 2015 and April through July 2016. When were those texts lost?
	Sometime in April, I believe.
	Found that some...
	We'll look that up in one second.
	Found that some of the improper queries were conducted by analysts during those periods.
	Improper queries.
	Would that be unmasking?
	In January...
	Third notice stated that human error was the primary factor.
	Oh, it's always human error.
	It's always human error when the government does it.
	Yeah, human error broke the law.
	But also suggested the system design issues contributed.
	For example, some systems that were used to query multiple data sets simultaneously required analysts to opt out of querying Section 702 upstream internet data rather than requiring an affirmative opt-in, which in the court's view would have been more conductive to compliance.
	Now I want to go back for just a second to page 19 because remember that part of the problems that they were having was there was confusion and this is because it really just got so out of control is that they were having confusion as to who and what and how could spy.
	And so it's like well how many different bureaucracies are allowed to do this?
	How many members of different bureaucracies are allowed to do this?
	And that became a huge issue.
	On page 19, we have three redactions, and it's obviously three numbers.
	That relatively narrow inquiry found that redacted number analysts had made redacted separate queries into redacted number of U.S. person identifiers, etc.
	So think about it.
	I think it's obvious, just by looking at it, that you have the number of analysts is a double-digit number.
	The number of queries is a triple-digit number, and the number of people that they were using as U.S. person identifiers was a double-digit number.
	So how many different analysts are making these requests into how many different people and how many requests they're making?
	That's going to be big.
	I mean, if that number is, say...
	And that middle number is definitely a triple-digit.
	And I think the first two are probably double digits, but...
	You know, let's not jump to that conclusion.
	Let's say maybe it's a single digit.
	So if that number is, let's say five, you say, okay, you know what, maybe we expect that number to be five.
	CIA, FBI, NSA, counterterrorism, etc.
	Okay, maybe five people are making how many separate inquiries?
	Let's go lowest.
	A hundred?
	Why are they making a hundred?
	Why is that possible?
	And then again, I mean, I guess the lowest number would obviously be a 1, but what if that's not a 1?
	What if that's a 10?
	Well, why are there 10 people that they need to identify?
	But it all goes back to that first number.
	Let's say that number of analysts is actually 15, 25, 50. 99. So why do you have that many people doing this?
	That now it turns out was breaking the law the entire time.
	That to me is going to be a key redaction to find out just how out of control this really got.
	Because if that number is more than five to me, this whole system is out of control and needs to be shut down.
	Because that's absurd.
	That is absurd.
	And I like how it's being spun now, the growing conservative conspiracy theory about the missing FBI texts.
	What do you mean?
	That's a confirmed report.
	They admitted it themselves.
	Yeah.
	It's in the letter.
	I read the letter.
	We don't have the text from this date to this date.
	And they're so stupid, though.
	They actually think they deleted those texts.
	Those texts aren't deleted, you morons.
	Look, I've talked to a guy who goes into computers and does this for a living.
	We had one of them.
	We had a guy on the air.
	Ain't nothing they can't grab.
	No.
	Unless it has been destroyed and his phone was not destroyed.
	Think about this, Rob.
	You know what?
	Maybe I should try to get this guy back on, actually.
	I think I'm going to try to get this guy back on.
	I had a guest.
	I can't remember if it was on the War Room or when we were still doing the nightly news.
	This man runs a tech firm.
	I can't even remember the name.
	In fact, somebody might be able to find it.
	And the FBI hired this man's firm to investigate the Tom Brady cell phone.
	A football player over the guy that photoshopped the picture.
	So we brought this individual on to ID and confirm or deny a photoshopped picture.
	That's a separate story.
	But that's what we had him on for.
	But the reason why we had him on is because he's an expert.
	He's worked with the FBI. He's one of the best in the field.
	And the FBI hired this man to see if they could get the text and the data or whatever.
	From an alleged football player and the amount of air in his balls.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So you have the FBI going through extreme lengths to try to recover data from a cell phone from a football player and his balls.
	Okay?
	And guess what?
	He did it.
	He got the data.
	And if you don't think for one second that there might be a patriot out there who might want to hire a firm like that to get all those texts that you deleted or to get all those emails that Hillary deleted, even though she thinks she bleached bit her server, even though they think they smashed all their cell phones and hit all their servers with the Debbie Wasserman Schultz, oh, they'll find them.
	In fact, I bet they already do.
	And that's why you're freaking out.
	So maybe it's time to get that guy back on.
	But I guarantee you, Rob, In fact, you know what?
	I bet they already have them.
	I bet that they already have those texts and those emails, and they're probably just waiting.
	Well, that could be why they've reopened these investigations going on.
	Now there's three new investigations with the Justice Department looking into the Clintons.
	We're both very calm right now, but this is pretty amazing information.
	I don't even have a voice.
	It's very hard to go through if you're not used to doing it.
	I've read...
	You know, documents like this in the past, but just trying to make sense of the jargon that goes in.
	Well, here's one.
	Here's one, Rob, that even the layman would understand.
	This is on page 21, the bottom of page 21, guys.
	The government also reported, and this was after the extension of the query into the minimization process.
	So this is under the Trump administration.
	Not the Obama administration.
	This is after the Trump administration extended the query into the minimization process.
	And they said the government also reported that the NSA Inspector General study for the first quarter of 2016 had found redacted number of improper queries.
	So, there you go.
	They broke the law.
	It's right there in the document, folks.
	That's not conjecture.
	We're not making that up.
	The government also reported.
	That the NSA IG study for the first quarter of 2016 had found blank number of improper inquiries.
	So they broke the law.
	They broke the law.
	Look at this.
	Trump overstates missing texts involving FBI agent.
	I have the article yesterday.
	These people live in denial, man.
	They said, oh, Trump said it was five months worth of texts.
	It's December, January, February, March, April, May.
	They say it's more than that.
	Well, I mean, it might be like partial dates on those.
	Oh, but let's obsess over the exact number of days.
	Was he a day off?
	How about they broke the law?
	See, now I'm starting to get mad because now I'm starting to think about all these protesters I have to deal with that have been the most brainwashed minions.
	I just love it.
	Now it's a conspiracy theory that the texts are missing.
	When you read the article from the Justice Department that says the texts are missing.
	You know, we already knew that this was going on, and I'm sorry I'm going off on a jag here, but we already knew that there was mass brainwashing going on.
	Oh, it's...
	But I think, actually, it's time to take it one further.
	I think...
	Here's what I think.
	I think they actually already launched the full attempt to brainwash the public entirely.
	And because we're guinea pigs, essentially being tested like lab rats, guess what?
	It only worked on half the population.
	It didn't work on you.
	Didn't work on me?
	I'm willing to bet it's not even half.
	I'm willing to bet it's 35-40% of the population.
	I'll put it to you this way.
	I think you're right.
	It's easy to get a lot of people out there and say, look, this is half the population when it's 20-30% of a population of a city.
	No, I think you're right.
	And I would take it one step further.
	I'd actually say it worked on half the people that actually essentially ingested it.
	So basically, you've got basically Flyover America ain't on Twitter.
	They ain't on You know, they don't care about this.
	They live their own lives.
	The Force has a strong influence on the weak-minded.
	But, I mean, when you look at the videos that we shot this weekend, and you literally just present someone with a fact, just a fact, and they say no, it's like, who are you?
	What are you?
	I mean, you are a brainwashed minion.
	You have been completely soul-sucked and mind-sucked.
	That you can't even believe your own eyes.
	Dude, I'm telling you, man.
	They launched the effort to brainwash America and they did not have the success rate they needed.
	And now they're about to fail.
	There's one of them right there.
	There's one of them right there.
	That is a brainwashed fool.
	Look at all the spooge on his face.
	We'll get into this more when we're on the war room.
	I'm going to have Millie Weaver on.
	God, close your mouth.
	But I'll tell you what.
	Here's the deal with this guy.
	This guy claims he's out there independently.
	It's a George Carlin skit that that guy needs to...
	This guy claims he's out there independently.
	That guy's not out there independently, folks.
	No, no.
	That guy's with someone big.
	Someone's funding that guy.
	Someone's feeding that guy propaganda.
	Someone's feeding that guy talking points.
	The little Soros bot with his $200 leather hat.
	And I'll take it one step further.
	I'm a poor commie.
	I'll tell you what.
	I'll take it one step further and then we'll get back to the document because that's what we're on air for.
	But...
	He knocked your thing?
	You should have knocked his camera.
	Well, I should have just knocked him out, honestly.
	But that's neither here nor there.
	But here's another big story.
	You know, they keep copies.
	They say the NSA is going to destroy these internet transactions through the accelerated age-off process.
	But they keep backups of the transactions at Archive for years.
	The NSA doesn't get rid of anything.
	And we're supposed to believe the FBI just doesn't have these texts.
	I'm telling you, they have the texts.
	They all have the texts.
	And if they don't, they can get them.
	Yeah.
	It's out there.
	This is amazing.
	Yeah, I have something to say.
	Go ahead.
	This is amazing.
	So, I'm further down the document.
	I'm actually at page 27. And one thing about it is that they put in the bylaws that they're still required to...
	Basically, they put a non-compliance order in to explain that...
	If anything does get collected, that's U.S. communications, they're supposed to say, oh, NSA was not in compliance, and they have to automatically delete it.
	But it says that there still can be approval by the director to keep the documents and keep the files.
	So that would basically resolve Clapper if he didn't collect something by order.
	So it's like, hey, you know, we've got all of these gifts, but you can't look at them.
	But you can look at them.
	It's like, oh.
	Yeah, you know, it's illegal to look at all this stuff that we've acquired.
	And so if you do look at it, that's breaking the law.
	But we just like to keep it there in case maybe you want to look at it.
	And I'll tell you what.
	Had this been, say, the Democrats had got Trump ran as a Democrat.
	All right, just say that.
	And the Republicans were guilty of doing this?
	No.
	Which they probably were under Bush.
	That's why they erased all the NSA files under Bush.
	But they just didn't go out and use it as dirty as the Democrats did.
	We would be calling for an investigation.
	I'm assuming you're talking about this sentence right here, Zach.
	On the Republicans.
	In the middle of page 27. But it's not.
	It's the dirty Democrats.
	It's disgusting.
	If NSA determines that the sender of all intended recipients of discrete communication within an MCT were located in the U.S. at the time of that discrete communication, then the entire MCT must be promptly destroyed.
	Unless the director makes the required waiver determination for each and every domestic communication contained in the MCT. Is that what you were talking about?
	Yeah, that's exactly what I'm talking about.
	And a couple of pages back, they have a process that they created in March of 2017 that basically...
	They're doing this as a backup.
	They're doing this because they need to absolve themselves of the guilt that they had in the past.
	So they're rewording themselves and saying, oh, you're right.
	We're going to fix that.
	We should have probably deleted that.
	From now on, we'll delete it.
	But because of in the past, we should have done that.
	We'll just absolve it as if nothing happened.
	Really, it's just a blatant lie to say that they destroy it.
	They don't destroy it.
	They say, yeah, we destroy it.
	And then they admit, well, you know, but we really didn't destroy it because we still have it.
	Hey, you know what, guys?
	It takes at least a year to be verified to be destroyed.
	Hey, listen, guys.
	I'll tell you what.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	But first, can somebody get me some lung cleanse?
	I would love to get a bottle of lung cleanse right now because my throat is absolutely killing me.
	Look, folks.
	Alex Jones is live right now.
	The Alex Jones Show.
	The War Room is going to go live here in 55 minutes.
	We uploaded, it feels like, over 100 videos over the weekend of all the marches and all the protests and everything.
	That's why my voice is shot.
	But here's the thing.
	I'm legitimately requesting some lung cleanse right now because it really does amazing stuff.
	And whenever I get a sore throat like this, I always go for the lung cleanse.
	Hold on one second.
	Michael, if you could maybe put those videos that we had that we were going to go to, put those in, mix them in with ads so people can see.
	It's basically Mike Gates, Matt Gates, Scott Perry, Trey Gowdy.
	Thank you, sir.
	Thank you.
	And Mark...
	Mark, somebody.
	I never got the printout.
	It took too long to print out, I guess.
	It's still printing over there.
	Mark Meadows, I think, is his name?
	Yeah, that's one.
	Yeah.
	Just talking about what's in this memo, which is a breakdown of what this is.
	The four-page memo that Nunez has is just going to name the redactions that are in here.
	And it's going to connect the dots.
	Again, give me the dot cam guy.
	The Nunez memo will connect the dots between all of these names and the Russian dossier.
	And basically all the stuff that we're going over today in this declassified, heavily redacted document about the illegal activity that we assume is in relation to Obama's FISA request to spy on President Trump via the Russian dossier.
	So the Nunes memo will likely just kind of put all that on the map.
	But again, we're only able to do this.
	You know, people say, why does Alex plug products so much?
	Well, what other ads do you hear?
	You don't hear any other ads here.
	We don't try to sell you anything else other than what we are selling you.
	We have to fund ourselves.
	That way we remain independent and we don't have to rely on anyone else to keep us on air.
	We don't have to rely on big insurance companies buying up major ad shares.
	Big pharmaceutical companies buying major ad shares.
	No, we rely on you buying the products.
	And because that's our lifeblood, because that's our backbone, we have to give you great products like lung cleanse.
	So you hear my voice.
	I'm obviously struggling right now.
	I'm going to take some lung cleanse right now.
	You do three sprays, then you breathe in.
	Do you give us a sign-off here?
	We'll go to a quick break.
	I'm going to do the lung cleanse here and use this incredible product to fix my voice.
	But the products are the real deal, folks.
	And I'm going to tell you this.
	I've gone out and interviewed people and done interviews with people that I have on tape.
	And I showed these to our back office, who's in charge of marketing.
	And they're like, we can't go out there and say these things.
	We can't put this stuff on the air, these claims that these people are making.
	They're saying...
	Changed their life.
	I met a lady in Colorado who came up to me crying, gave me a hug, said it was liver cleanse that we sold.
	And she had a couple other products.
	But she said she did these liver cleanses and she had the nascent iodine.
	She couldn't get out of bed.
	She did these things.
	And now she's up at this rally.
	I've met other people.
	I was at Portland, Oregon.
	A guy was telling me he had all these horrible bowel issues.
	That he was able to, you know, help himself.
	So many great probiotics on the site.
	And I'm probably saying too much at this point.
	It's amazing the products that we sell here.
	They're high quality.
	And we sell them for the best price we can give them to you at.
	Because we still have to, you know, you think about it.
	Every product has to get made, shipped here.
	We ship it.
	We do high quality bottling too.
	We have to store it.
	There's a lot that goes into every product.
	I mean, if we were just to...
	Attach a camera to a bottle of X2 and you watch it getting processed and getting through the thing.
	You would be truly amazed when it comes to you in a package at home because it takes a lot of work, a lot of man hours, a lot of the thought of going into making that product even before it's being made.
	There's a lot going into it.
	You can't just have iodine crystals in your house.
	They have to keep these in a safe.
	They have to keep these locked up.
	In fact, It's in a safe inside a cage inside a locked building.
	That's how secure this is.
	I know.
	I've been in talks with a guy who was told by doctors he would never walk again.
	He's been taking DNA Force for two years.
	He thinks he's going to walk by the end of the year.
	DNA Force is amazing.
	I was taking it religiously, hardcore, and I've had two torn ACLs.
	My right one I got fixed.
	My left one I didn't.
	I let it.
	Just heal on its own.
	I don't even know if it really healed, but I just wear a brace.
	I started getting nerve regrowth in my knee where it was painful.
	I mean, look, let me tell you.
	When your nerves start regrowing where you had surgery, that's probably why they cut the nerves around where you're supposed to get your surgery.
	So you don't feel the pain.
	Because I have two screws in my knee.
	Okay?
	And that pain started coming back.
	And I'm not saying...
	I'm not sure how to take that.
	What do you do when you have nerve regrowth in areas that you don't need it?
	Now, in my wrist, where I had some problems, it feels great now.
	I used to not be able to do this all the way.
	I had a bone sticking up here.
	Had the regrowth in those nerves as well.
	So I've had different spots.
	You know, I'm an athletic person.
	I've done a lot of stuff over the years.
	So my body's pretty beat up.
	But let me tell you, that DNA force, whatever's in it, is powerful and it will regrow your nerves.
	So beware.
	You may not want them to regrow in all the places that they're going to regrow.
	But then again, you may want it.
	So check it out for yourself.
	DNA Force is our flagship product.
	And then try Alpha Power, and you're going to find results in that that you might not expect, but that are going to be powerful.
	So I'm going to take some lung cleanse, and we're going to take some quick breaks.
	So here's me trying to help my throat here on air, and I know that lung cleanse will help because I've done this in the past.
	And breathe in.
	Breathe in.
	Tastes good.
	It really does taste good.
	I bet I already sound better.
	It's got that hint of eucalyptus in it.
	I bet I already sound better right now.
	It's going to clear out your sinus passages.
	We also have Pollen Block, which is one of our newest products.
	So check that out.
	It's made out of quail eggs.
	They've figured out that these quail eggs fed a special diet, and it helps clearing out your sinuses, help you breathe clearly.
	So there you go.
	Pollen Block.
	Check it out.
	50% off.
	Infowarsstore.com.
	It's how you support us.
	So we'll be back.
	We'll wrap this up because we've got to stop a little bit before the war room and reset the streams.
	So thanks for watching Infowars.com Infowars.com forward slash show and Infowarsstore.com are all the websites.
	Please send those links out to everybody you know.
	Thanks for watching.
	We'll be right back.
	Climb to the top of the food chain with Alpha Power by Infowars Life.
	For those who want to increase testosterone and energy levels, most men know that testosterone levels begin to decline, starting around 30, at a rate of about 1-2% per year.
	This drop can show signs such as fatigue, low energy, low sex drive, and muscle loss.
	Alpha Power is packed with some of the most potent and clinically tested ingredients on the market.
	The secret is in the synergistic blend of ancient ingredients that have been concentrated into their most potent forms, including Uricoma Longifolia, originally from Malaysia.
	Maka root from Peru, horny goat wheat from China, and tribulus from India.
	Reach your alpha male potential with Alpha Power.
	Get Alpha Power now at 50% off and secure your bottle today.
	Congressman Gowdy, do you want to expound on the secret society idea?
	Sure, I wish I could.
	I wish I'd been the one who either sent that text or received it.
	You have this insurance policy in the spring of 2016, and then the day after the election, the day after what they really, really didn't want to have happen, there's a text exchange between these two FBI agents, these two supposed to be objective, fact-centric FBI agents, saying, perhaps this is the first meeting of the secret society.
	So, of course, I'm going to want to know what secret society are you talking about, because...
	You're supposed to be investigating objectively the person who just won the Electoral College.
	So, yeah, I'm going to want to know.
	Congressman Gowdy, you know, in terms of that glitch of the missing text messages, those months, are you going to subpoena the phone companies to get those text messages?
	You know, Martha, Congress is not great at using legal process like subpoenas and search warrants.
	Of course we want that.
	I hope Mike Horowitz, the Inspector General, got them.
	Unfortunately, the way our government's set up, law enforcement is better able to go to communications carriers and get texts and instant messages than Congress is.
	So, yes, I want them, but I don't want them two years from now, and I don't want them after a motion to be held in contempt of Congress.
	I want them sooner rather than later.
	So either the Bureau needs to find them or we need to find them.
	We need to have someone who has really easy access to these text messages, and it may be law enforcement.
	Let me ask either one of you this last very quick question.
	The four-page memo of the FISA abuses that it details, will there be a criminal referral made to DOJ with regard to that?
	I don't know that Johnny and I, either one, are into referring cases.
	You know, we used to work there.
	We're not there anymore.
	I'm going to let them sort out the criminality.
	It's not my job to make criminal referrals.
	It is my job to provide oversight.
	All right, gentlemen, thank you very much.
	Good to see you both tonight.
	I think that this will not end just with firings.
	I believe there are people who will go to jail.
	I was very persuaded by the evidence.
	And it also became clear to me why Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham felt it so important to refer this matter for criminal prosecution.
	You don't get to try to undermine our country, undermine our elections, and then simply get fired.
	So I think there will be criminal implications here.
	here and we have to underscore the point that you and Jim Jordan just made.
	Every single Democrat on the Intelligence Committee voted against even allowing other members of Congress to see this information.
	So you know they're going to fight against release to the American people.
	What are the Democrats so afraid of?
	Why don't they want the American people to know the truth about what was going on with the government, how that impacted the president, his transition, his campaign?
	And it just seems interesting to me that Democrats don't want us to know what the entire basis was in the first place for the Mueller probe.
	We're going to drag this out through the midterm elections to try to embarrass this president and distract this Congress from the critical work we've got to do to save this great country.
	Let's release the documents.
	Without giving any details, do you conclude that Mueller, the whole issue of Trump-Russia collusion never should have come up?
	Does Mueller need to disband?
	Absolutely.
	This was a lie built on corruption, built on a sham.
	The entire investigation is a fiction.
	It's a fallacy.
	Until this began, when the American people see how different people interacted with one another, how organizations were infected and infiltrated and subjected to tremendous bias of individuals and how that really played out, I think that every American will understand how absolutely ludicrous it is that we continue to allow the Mueller probe to go forward.
	It needs to end because the entire basis is a lie.
	From my sources, Sarah, that they're saying this should result in the immediate firing of Lisa Page, of Peter Strzok, of Bruce Hoare, also Andrew McCabe.
	I have some questions.
	Where does Rod Rosenstein stick in this equation, the one that appointed the special counsel?
	Because we now know the dossier, the phony Clinton bought and paid for dossier, that that was used for the...
	Carnivore.
	We have a small bottle and a big bottle.
	All very affordable.
	33% off, out of the gate.
	The thing I am so ultra excited about.
	Because I like a high protein diet and I love meat.
	Everybody knows, even if you chew well, it has problems in the lower GI tract, the colon, the upper and lower intestines.
	And if you get the right enzymes, as you get older, you have less and less natural digestive enzymes.
	That's why you get more and more heartburn and stomach headaches.
	As you get older, you can't eat rich foods you could eat before.
	It's because you don't produce the same amount of enzymes.
	This is next level beyond probiotic.
	I've been taking this for two months.
	As it was getting prepared, it was getting ready.
	And man, I'm telling you, it is incredible.
	Normally you eat a big steak for a day or two, you're tired.
	Doesn't happen anymore with this.
	And never have any issues.
	You know, I ate that 20-ounce ribeye, taking family out, you know, once every couple weeks for a fancy dinner.
	It's called Carnivore Digestive Enzymes.
	Relieves occasional indigestion, supports normal digestion, and macronutrients absorption.
	Helps digest high-protein foods.
	People that are on these...
	Ketosis diets and Atkins-type diets and paleo diets.
	It's just amazing.
	Made in the USA, non-GMO. It's delivered directly into the stomach where it's needed with the digestive enzymes that your body needs with the acids to do this.
	Please go to InfoWarsLife.com, InfoWarsStore.com and read about this.
	Introducing Carnivore, the all-new enzyme formula at InfoWarsStore.com.
	Free shipping and 33% off out of the gates.
	Man, I used to eat a big steak.
	I didn't feel tired.
	I ate one now.
	I get tired.
	Turn taking this.
	Boom.
	Ate a big ribeye.
	Boom.
	Eat two of these.
	Eat one of these.
	It's incredible.
	Digest it better.
	Aren't tired the next day.
	Don't get heartburn.
	Don't get a stomachache.
	And that's what the government even lets you say about this digestive enzyme.
	So Carnivore is next level.
	Infowarslive.com.
	Infowarsstore.com.
	It's the big umbrella site, but Infowarslive.com takes you right to it.
	Carnivore.
	Infowarsstore.com.
	Infowarslive.com.
	Or 888-253-3139.
	Tell us about the investigation, to the extent we know much about it, into the Clinton Foundation.
	Well, the accusation is that the Clinton Foundation was merely a money laundering operation where people paid in order to have access to the State Department.
	And there were notations on particular documents and bids where people would write FOB, friend of Bill, which means those were donors to the Clinton Foundation.
	And as a consequence, they were given special treatment.
	That's the type of thing that we have to know about now, not to exercise some revenge on a on a defeated presidential candidate, but to ensure that we don't.
	We have people right now acting as vendors on behalf of the United States of America, not as a consequence of their merit or what they can do, but because they're friends and potentially donors to the Clinton Foundation.
	Yeah, well, I mean, that whole operation was false from day one, obviously.
	Why has it taken so long to get these investigations underway?
	You know, we've been calling for this for over five months.
	Twenty members of the House Judiciary Committee sent a letter to Attorney General Sessions saying that we've got to look into these things because of the ongoing security concerns.
	And finally, now, we have Hillary Clinton dealing with investigations cascading down on her like it's a bomb cyclone.
	I think the day's coming soon, Tucker, when we'll be sending an I'm with her t-shirt to Hillary Clinton's cellmate.
	Yeah, I mean, so you think that she is criminally exposed, potentially?
	Absolutely.
	Look, if people were taking bribes and then as a consequence of those bribes engaging in actions that they would not otherwise be engaging in, that is a crime.
	You cannot do that in the United States of America.
	And we've got to go now and remedy the consequences.
	Take, for example, the subject of your show tonight, the opioid problem.
	If you had people trafficking...
	And the reason these are so important, what we're hearing now from Matt Gaetz, is it goes to the heart of everything.
	If y'all can bring down the volume just a little bit.
	It goes to the heart of everything that we've been saying forever and ever.
	That the government has been totally corrupt.
	Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
	And now we're seeing it in the form of this.
	A hundred pages that show how the government goes around and grabs information off private citizens.
	And including the elected president.
	And it doesn't matter what side is doing it.
	It's wrong.
	It's always wrong, and you cannot have this.
	You cannot have this go on over and over and over and over again and not do anything about it.
	So it's a good thing that we're bringing this to light.
	And it's a good thing that we're going to bring this to light.
	Let me take you to this article.
	Let's see.
	This is...
	What William Benny was talking about.
	This is from electrospace.net.
	Slides about NSA's upstream collection.
	And it was in one of the PRISM slides.
	You know, how did we get this PRISM, these slides anyway?
	It was a Brazilian weekly television magazine broadcasted news reports about NSA operations and they showed a bunch of these slides that were unpublished from an NSA PowerPoint presentation that was in a background.
	And so people were able to blow these up and go, look what they're doing!
	Look what they're doing.
	They have TAPS set up, and I think we have the map of it here.
	They show the cables that are going across, the corporate portfolio, the transit authorities, the authorities they're using.
	They access massive amounts of data controlled by a variety of legal authorities.
	Most SSs are controlled by partner tasking delays.
	But it's just slide after slide from the NSA. You got Monkey Rocket.
	You got Shifting Shadow.
	You got Orange Crush.
	You got FAA. You have all these different code names.
	Here's the choke points, international choke points that they list.
	All right, everything coming into the United States or going through the United States is a choke point where they grab everything coming through.
	But they also do it inside the United States, too.
	This is interesting.
	Storm Brew lists a bunch of ski resorts.
	Breckenridge, Tahoe, Sun Valley, Whistler, Maverick, Copper Mountain, and Killington.
	So, and I want to go back to this part right here.
	Some unique aspects of upstream collection as it takes place under various legal authorities.
	Executive Order 12333 for collection outside the United States.
	Transit for collection within the U.S. with both ends foreign.
	FISA for collection within the U.S. with one in foreign and targets individually approved by the FISA court, which is what we're going through here.
	FAA for collection within the U.S. with one in foreign and a list of targets approved annually by the FISA court.
	So FAA is sort of another broad net that they keep throwing out there.
	PRISM.
	Thank you.
	Breaks down at 91% or more than 220 million communications.
	Upstream is 9%, 22 million.
	And these all come from internet service providers.
	I'll read you this section.
	Under section 702, NSA is collecting data from internet service providers under the PRISM program.
	From 2011 FISA court ruling that was declassified upon request of the EFF, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, great people.
	We learned that under Section 702, FAA-NSA requires more than 250, acquires more than 200, let me read that again.
	FAA-NSA acquires more than 250 internet communications each year.
	The number breaks down as follows.
	So FAA has got upstream and prism.
	The ruling doesn't exactly explain what internet communication is, which is basically everything now.
	A problem that troubled both NSA and FISA court was that under upstream, it's technically very difficult to distinguish between single communications.
	To, from, or about targeted persons are those containing multiple communications.
	None, not all of which may be to, from, or about approved targeted addresses.
	Now again, that was all in this declassified document.
	All of that.
	And this just breaks it down.
	And this came out January 2014. This one came out August 31st, January 15th.
	And the only way we got these is because they happened to be on the background of some camera work that these guys were doing and somebody made a boo-boo.
	But that's how we get information sometimes.
	Not a prince of boo-boo.
	Just an aboo-boo.
	Boy, it's just...
	Again...
	Tomorrow's news today, you know, we told you all this was going to happen.
	For years.
	And here we are.
	And it's just incredible.
	It's like, I was talking about it over the weekend with our cameraman, editor, producer, reporter, Harrison, how, you know, it's like we don't even recognize the history that we're making right now.
	We don't even understand.
	We can't even comprehend, I think, just how...
	Incredible and phenomenal these times are right now that we're living through.
	I mean, what are they going to be writing about in the history books?
	They're going to be writing about the second American revolution.
	They're going to be writing about the new founding fathers.
	They're going to be writing about the people that saved America from absolute corruption and destruction.
	I mean, that's us.
	That is us.
	It's just unbelievable.
	And they can lie about us.
	They can say all these insults and call us names and say we're fake news and get mad at us on the street for trying to tell people truth.
	Is that the Axios story?
	I'm sorry that you just RS.
	Okay.
	I've got a story that we're going to be covering here too from Axios because you've got Shep Smith over at Fox.
	So I think that guy just like, I don't understand.
	He's controlled opposition or something because he's the only one at Fox news that seems to just go against Trump every day.
	And so, but that's, that's a side story.
	So we're gonna be covering all that.
	We've got to sign off here, though, because we've got to get the crew ready for the war room.
	But here's the deal, folks.
	You've got the Alex Jones show that's still on right now.
	Obviously, David Knight is on every morning from 8 to 11, three hours a day, and then the war room from 3 to 6. But we're only able to do these special broadcasts and these extended broadcasts and have the crew.
	Let's get a shot at the crew here.
	I mean, we had to get a full crew.
	We don't half-ass this.
	We had a full crew.
	Doubling down on their hours.
	Grabbing clips from Alex's show to put in here.
	Doubling their workload.
	It was a big effort.
	And it's all possible because of you guys supporting us at Infowarsstore.com.
	And there's really just so much for you to choose from at Infowarsstore.com.
	Go ahead, give the crew a wave there that made all of this possible.
	That stayed in here later than they normally do, working harder than they normally work, which is extremely hard already to begin with.
	It's all possible because of you guys at InfowarStore.com.
	You've heard Alex Jones.
	He said he wants to be 20 hours live a day by the end of the year.
	Well, that is only possible with your support at InfowarStore.com.
	You know, it's funny, Rob.
	There's so many products at InfowarStore.com now that...
	I even discover new products that I didn't even know that we had, and then they become amazing.
	I'm now basically going to be, I mean, I'm stocked up now on our Emmerich essential oils, eucalyptus and frankincense.
	I didn't even realize that they were there.
	I use it every day now.
	I use frankincense every day.
	I use eucalyptus every time I go to the gym.
	It helps you breathe easier.
	I didn't even realize we had all these amazing essential oils.
	These are amazing products.
	We have so many.
	It's like you don't even realize how many are there.
	So check out the entire store.
	If you like what we do, if you want us to be live more, if you want us to be doing more man on the streets, if you want us to go to more protests, if you want us to have more reporters, it's up to you.
	Infowarsstore.com.
	And we bring you great products.
	We don't make it hard to support us.
	And that's the symbiosis.
	That's the 360 win that Alex always talks about.
	So we're about to sign off.
	Rob, any final words here?
	Well, I want to go over a couple of these articles real quick.
	CYA articles.
	FBI. Devin Nunes won't show a U.S. memo alleging surveillance abuses.
	The FBI has yet to see the controversial memo alleging the intelligence community...
	Controversial memo.
	Okay, Betsy Woodruff.
	Has yet to see it, yeah.
	Here's the thing.
	The FBI has not permitted to see the memo, the Daily Beast has learned.
	The FBI requested a copy to that.
	It has been declined.
	So they're trying to make it seem like Devin Nunez is the bad guy for pointing out these abuses.
	Let me tell you something.
	Betsy Woodruff...
	Hey, show us the text and we'll show you the memo, FBI. Can we see your text?
	Betsy Woodruff is actually one of my favorite liberal reporters because she's actually the only one that will actually cover that and write that story.
	So she is, I mean, I always give her credit because she actually covers this stuff, and she goes on MSNBC and CNN, and she actually covers this stuff, but she always has that little, like, negative thing, like controversial memo.
	How is it controversial, Betsy?
	I've tried to get Betsy to come on.
	She won't come on with me.
	And then, ex-CIA senior official.
	Who do you think that is?
	Who do you think?
	Clapper?
	Phil Mudd.
	Oh, Phil Mudd.
	Phil Mudd says the FBI memo's a hatchet job.
	Wait, wait, you mean...
	They literally just trot this guy out any time they want him to say something.
	Wait, Phil...
	Shh, hole.
	Exactly.
	Phil Scholler?
	Proud Scholler?
	Yeah, he is a Proud Scholler.
	And what does Nunez know about intelligence?
	I mean, Phil Mudd's a guy who gets on TV and talks about killing the president.
	Oh my gosh, dude.
	Oh my gosh.
	Oh my gosh.
	It all just hit.
	Phil Mudd's probably in this.
	No, no, no.
	It all just hit, dude.
	It all just hit.
	The reason why they're freaking out and the reason why they deleted that text It's because I think they were planning to assassinate the president.
	Phil Mudd said it on TV. Oh my gosh.
	That's what it is.
	That's why they're freaking out.
	I need to be careful not to yell here.
	Folks, I think that that's what's about to be blown up here.
	Oh my gosh.
	That was August of 2017. Oh my gosh.
	Wow.
	The government is going to kill this guy.
	I mean, think about it.
	Why else would you go on air and say that unless you've already consciously thought about it and even talked about it?
	This is a basic psychology thing.
	Oh.
	My.
	Gosh.
	I mean, look at all the other lengths they went to to try to stop President Trump.
	You don't think they would put a bullet in his head?
	Is there anything else you wanted to cover, Rob?
	Nope, but those texts went up to May, and so he made this comment in August.
	So it would have been a few months after the texts coming out.
	I think he was probably trying to activate somebody into doing that.
	Yeah.
	Because that's what they do.
	They put those things out on TV. Maybe he sent that activation code over a text.
	Could be.
	Could be.
	We've got the document up.
	Bring up the article where we have it up on Infowars.com because I hear they pulled it off the Director of National Intelligence.
	This is just nuts, man.
	I'm getting reports about that.
	This is the warm turning.
	Please pull up the article on Infowars.com.
	This is the storm.
	This is the warm turning.
	They can go find this, read it for themselves, do their own reports.
	There it is.
	Exclusive Infowars releases secret FISA memo.
	And it was leaked to us through William Benny.
	He came on the show, defended why he did it.
	He says it's a blueprint for everything they're doing right now.
	We've played all the clips.
	You can go back and re-watch this when it posts.
	We'll be posting this to the Alex Jones channel.
	I think the link is going to die when it goes to War Room.
	But we need to repost that.
	But we've got to sign off here because the War Room is going to be live in 25 minutes.
	Again, you guys make it all possible with your support at Infowarsstore.com.
	The Alex Jones Show is live right now at Infowars.com slash show.
	The real Alex Jones channel on YouTube, the Infowars Live YouTube channel.
	Everything is there for you.
	So we sign off.
	Flip on over to Paul Joseph Watson live on the Alex Jones Show.
	Alex may also be in there with him.
	I'm not sure.
	And then the War Room launches at 3 o'clock.
	Central time all the way through till 6. And just to give you a brief preview, Millie and I will be discussing everything we experienced over the weekend at the Women's March.
	Roger Stone will obviously be breaking in in the second hour to cover, I'm sure, this secret release and everything that Deep State is doing.
	And then Tyler Nixon, who I was actually thinking...
	In fact, guys, have we confirmed Tyler?
	Tyler Nixon?
	Have we talked to Tyler yet?
	Okay.
	Now, I've been on air, so I'm sorry.
	We're kind of wargaming.
	Wargaming live.
	We're wargaming everything live here.
	But my guess is if we've already reached out to Tyler and he's going to come on, he's probably reviewing this document right now and breaking it down.
	So he's going to be joining us on The War Room, too, with his expert legal analysis.
	For now, we sign off.
	Please support us at InfowarStore.com.
	I also filed a video report earlier today.
	We're being censored more than ever, folks.
	That's not an exaggeration.
	That's not hyperbole.
	That's not rhetoric.
	That is a fact.
	We're witnessing it in real time.
	They have to shut us down because we are bringing you the truth about President Trump and about the deep state that they do not want out there.
	And they put their little minions like Shepard Smith on air to sit there and try to paint the president in a bad light.
	No, Shep.
	People aren't buying it, and you're going to lose your job at Fox News unless you start reporting real news.
	So, for InfoWars.com, it's been Rob Dew, Owen Troyer.
	We sign off.
	The Alex Jones Show is live.
	The War Room starts at 3. Stay classy.
	We'll see you soon.
	If you are receiving this transmission, you are the resistance.
	Climb to the top of the food chain with Alpha Power by InfoWars Life.
	For those who want to increase testosterone and energy levels, most men know that testosterone levels begin to decline starting around 30 at a rate of about 1-2% per year.
	This drop can show signs such as fatigue, low energy, low sex drive, and muscle loss.
	Alpha Power is packed with some of the most potent and clinically tested ingredients on the market.
	The secret is in the synergistic blend of ancient ingredients that have been concentrated into their most potent forms, including Uricoma Longifolia, originally from Malaysia, Makaru from Peru, Horny goat wheat from China and tribulus from India.
	Reach your alpha male potential with Alpha Power.

▲