All Episodes
Dec. 14, 2017 - InfoWars Special Reports
21:30
Flashback - Trump Was 100% Right About Fake Dossier
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Time Text
If you are receiving this transmission, you are the resistance.
Welcome into the War Room.
It is Thursday, December 14th, 2017.
Merry Christmas from everyone here at InfoWars.
And you just heard the report from John Bowne talking about how on the Hill yesterday during Rosenstein's testimony, anything that was left of the Russian collusion special counsel probe has pretty much been burned to the anything that was left of the Russian collusion special counsel probe has pretty
But it actually gets one level better as I'm going to take us back in time a year ago and we're going to look at Trump's statements about this a year ago how the media reacted saying Trump was wrong but was he?
We're going to review that in a second, but just real quick, we've got a loaded show today.
Paul Nalen is going to be joining us in the first hour to discuss the rumors that Paul Ryan is going to be resigning and stepping down his office, and that sets it up for Paul Nalen perhaps to come in there and not have to drain the swamp of Ryan if he's going to drain the swamp of himself.
Roger Stone is going to be here in the second hour, obviously breaking down the latest in the White House intrigue and such.
Darren McBreen comes in studio in the third hour to talk Russian collusion and how liberalism is destroying, well, their own culture, really.
They're just pushing people away from their own cultures.
And then Leanne McAdoo in the final segment.
And we'll talk with her about what happened today in the FCC where a meeting had a bomb threat and they had to shut down the meeting momentarily.
Of course, Ajit Pai, who is running the meeting, has received death threats on Twitter as well.
But that's OK so far, according to Twitter.
But now let me get into this.
So what I did, and I actually like to do this occasionally because it can give you some perspective.
You just go back a year in time or two years and you try to get a lay of the land.
Specifically with this, I wanted to see what was being said and what Trump was saying about the Russian collusion narrative a year ago before he even took office when they were first really trying to brew this thing up.
Now, we discussed yesterday with callers some of the interesting timing with the Orr family and Christopher Steele and communications and these new text messages from Peter Strzok that have been revealed now as well.
And so that kind of sheds the light.
But let's go back in time to a year ago.
First, we'll start actually more than a year ago.
And this aligns up with the timing of the text messages and then what the caller was saying yesterday about how they were kind of fomenting this whole thing back in April and May, getting the communication and everything ready, and that's what the text messages would reveal too.
So here we go.
This is from Politico.
August 17, 2016. And this is when it really started to begin.
Trump says, I don't trust U.S. intelligence information.
Now, this story was basically about Mike Flynn and why he wants Mike Flynn on his team and why he's bringing Mike Flynn over.
Now, they put that headline on there because this is the first time when they're trying to get a reaction out of Trump about the intelligence agencies so that when they make the claim, They can go back and say, well, why did you trust them then and not now?
No.
Can't Trump the Trumpster.
He was rock solid the entire time as far back as last August saying, I don't trust the U.S. intelligence information.
Okay.
This is December 10th, 2016. It starts to get more interesting.
From Politico.
Trump's derision dismays intelligence specialists.
I'm going to read exactly from these stories.
Intelligence and foreign policy specialists were aghast Saturday at President-elect Donald Trump's latest disparagement of the intelligence community and perturbed by the Republican National Committee's accusation that the intelligence officials are hawking politically motivated narratives.
Oh, so it's not politically motivated.
How dare you make that assumption?
And then we find out it is.
The condemnation came after Trump's transition team and the RNC rejected news reports posted Friday night that the CIA and other intelligence agencies had determined in a secret assessment that the Russian government had interfered in this year's election specifically to elect Trump.
Now, here we are a year later, and they still haven't proven that.
And then you have John Cohen, who served in the intelligence agencies under Bush and Obama, says, this does not bode well for the future.
Well, yeah, if you're a Bushite and Obamaite, I guess not.
I go on.
The reactions came, and this is how they do it, folks.
The reactions came a whirlwind, 12 hours, that started when the Washington Post, oh, the fake news, Washington Post first reported on the CIA secret meeting.
Then the failing New York Times followed up with a piece reporting that intelligence officials had concluded, quote, with high confidence, with high confidence, leaves them an out there, that the Russians had also hacked the RNC's computer systems, but had intentionally withheld any pilfered information.
Oh.
In an unsigned late-night press release, the Trump transition team blasted both findings, saying, these are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
Ooh, ouch.
So they were wrong about that.
They couldn't be wrong about the Russian thing, though, right?
Even Sean Spicer hits back.
The RNC's chief strategist and communications director at the time admonished the Times for what he said was simply false reporting and insisted the RNC had not been hacked.
And then he says, quote, it didn't happen.
We offered the New York Times conclusive proof that it didn't happen.
They refused to look at it.
They ignored it because it didn't fit the narrative.
Wait a second.
So the RNC actually offered to give over their computers to prove they weren't hacked?
We're still waiting for the DNC to give that information over.
Oh, that's right, they're not.
So the RNC offered the proof.
The DNC is still yet to offer the proof.
Spicer then accused intelligence officials of pushing the story for political purposes.
Oh, how outrageous.
How dare Spicer said that?
Oh, wait.
Now we found out it's right.
I quote Spicer, Wow, and Sean Spicer was 100% right.
Lawmakers, same story still, lawmakers are pushing for such a commission as well, calling on the White House to turn over its eventual, they're just assuming these things, eventual findings from a just-announced review of election-related hacking so Congress can conduct its own probe.
So see, you read that story now, and how dumb does Politico look?
It gets better the next day.
December 11, 2016. Trump says, I don't need daily briefings.
President-elect Donald Trump said he does not need to receive the presidential intelligence briefing every day, suggesting in an interview aired Sunday that such briefings are repetitive and he is happy to rely on those around him on matters of intelligence and national security.
Now, they try to spin that and tell you that Trump is dumb and ignorant because he's not taking these intelligence reports.
No, he was simply saying that I'm getting these reports.
I don't need them eight times a day, the same report.
But then this is the juiciest of the juicies.
Same story.
From Politico, December 11, 2016, just a year ago.
Trump has been critical of the U.S. intelligence community, both as a presidential candidate and as president-elect.
What did I say?
He's been rock-solid on this, just like everything else.
The real estate mogul has called ridiculous reports that the intelligence community had come to a consensus that the Russian government had launched cyber attacks during the election process intended to help instill him as install him as president.
He told Wallace that he does not believe the intelligence community's assessment.
Drumroll, please.
Instead, suggesting that it might be a politically motivated attack against him by Democrats.
Wow.
That, folks, was December 11th.
2016. Spicer said it.
Trump said it.
Word for word, this is a Democrat attack.
It's fake news.
Here's our servers.
The DNC won't show you theirs.
This is totally convoluted and a political hit job because they don't like the results.
Trump said it.
Spicer said it.
And this is so key.
Trump said it.
I'll repeat it again.
This is from December 11, 2016. Trump told Wallace...
He does not believe the intelligence community's assessment, instead suggesting that it might be a politically motivated attack against him by Democrats.
And now here we are a year later, and the president was 110,000% accurate.
Another, this is December 12, 2016. The day after that, Trump vs.
Congress on Russian hacking.
It talks about how all of these senators, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Chuck Schumer, they need an investigation into this.
Without allowing it to become a partisan issue.
Without.
So will they now come out and say something, McCain, Graham, Schumer, that this is clearly a partisan and biased probe into Trump?
We're waiting.
Trump was right over a year ago.
The rest are still wrong.
Someone very profoundly once said, many years ago, that if fascism ever comes to America, it'll come in the name of liberalism.
This young generation...
Who scream words like fascist have actually themselves become the fascists.
You guys are the fascists!
You're all the fascists!
You're a f***ing white male!
I just wish that somebody would create, like, some kind of a safe space where we can all just go and...
Hey!
You're a f***ing white man who gets to do whatever he wants to in this space, right?
You need to get out.
I actually don't.
All right.
Hey, who wants to help me get the support from you?
I need some muscle over here.
Oh, boy.
What happened?
Oh, my God.
Donald J. Trump is now president of the United States.
Oh, my God.
So the question is, are social justice warriors mentally ill, or are they just stupid?
When your emotions control your actions, it affects not only yourself, but the people around you.
There are over 7 million mentally ill and emotionally disturbed children in America.
This has to be a joke!
I cannot believe this is happening!
I'm literally about to f***ing kill myself and I'm not kidding!
You better f***ing fix it right now!
Get the f*** out of here!
Jeff's losing control of himself.
Get your phone away!
Why?
Quit recording!
The matter he gets, the worse it becomes.
Get the f*** away!
You couldn't help interrupting, could you?
You added nothing to that conversation.
These are some of Tommy's drawings that the school sent over.
There's an awful lot of hate in them.
I am a nasty woman.
America!
America!
Like your wet dreams infused Bing bing bong bong bing bing bing The
House Judiciary Committee was a spectacle of division as Democrats and Republicans grilled Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.
The Republicans feverishly attacking all of the revelations surrounding the FBI's political power play and the fraudulent Steele dossier.
What in the hell is going on with the Department of Justice and the FBI? The reason we have special counsel, this is a very important point, and you know it.
The reason we have special counsel is because of a conflict of interest.
The regulation itself specifically makes reference to a conflict of interest.
And we don't like conflicts of interest because it undercuts people's confidence in both the process and the result.
So let's be really clear why we have special counsel.
There was either a real or perceived conflict of interest that we were fearful would either impact the result or people's confidence in the process.
That's why we have something called special counsel, and that's why we have special counsel in this fact pattern.
And then, lo and behold, those who are supposed to make sure there are no conflicts of interest seem to have a few of their own.
There's a senior prosecutor who sent obsequious emails to a fact witness.
She can be described as nothing other than a fact witness.
She's a really important fact witness if you pursue the line of inquiry that my Democrat friends want to pursue.
They got off of collusion and now they're on obstruction of justice.
She may be the most important fact witness in an obstruction of justice case.
And the senior prosecutor for this conflict of interest-free special counsel sent a fawning obsequious email to a fact witness.
And then we have prosecutors assigned to conduct this investigation who donated almost exclusively to one candidate over another.
And then we have a prosecutor assigned to this conflict of interest-free team.
That attended what was supposed to be, what he'd hoped to be, a victory party for Secretary Clinton.
And we have a senior DOJ official, Mr. Deputy Attorney General, with an office that used to be two doors down from yours.
Meeting with Fusion GPS, and Fusion GPS, of course, was paying for Russian dirt on the very person that they're supposed to be objectively investigating.
And then that same senior DOJ official's Wife, the one that met with Fusion GPS, his wife was on the payroll of Fusion GPS. While the Democrats continued to hold President Trump's feet to the fire, ignoring any wrongdoing.
I take it your judgment on Mr. Mueller has not changed today, correct?
And you would not have appointed a special counsel or appointed Mr. Mueller if you thought he was going to engage in a witch hunt, correct?
Correct.
And so it's you...
You then would disagree with the president's labeling of the special counsel's investigation as a witch hunt, I assume.
I don't know exactly what the president meant by that, Congressman.
The special counsel's investigation is not a witch hunt.
On top of this stinking pile of deception, Paul Joseph Watson added one more revelation.
Paul writes, amidst the 10,000 messages sent between anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok and lawyer Lisa Page, is a bizarre exchange revealing how the two, almost certainly with Deputy FBI Director Andy McCabe, discussed an insurance policy in case Donald Trump won the presidential election.
It reads, I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office, that there's no way Trump gets elected, but I'm afraid we can't take that risk.
It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40. Wall Street Journal columnist Kimberly Strassel remarked, Press is focusing deliberately on struck texts expressing hostility to Trump and noting it is okay for agents to have political opinions.
Press needs to focus on the messages suggesting he'd act on that hostility insurance policy, which is not okay.
None of this is okay.
Clearly, if Hillary had won the presidency, we would have never heard about half of this.
But she didn't.
And this may only be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the fallout as the Clinton machine crashes on the White House lawn.
John Bowne reporting for...
You know, someone very profoundly once said...
Many years ago that if fascism ever comes to America, it'll come in the name of liberalism.
You're fucking a white male!
You're a white man!
If you are receiving this transmission, you are the resistance.
Before we even had civilization 6,000 years ago, humans communicated through the clothing that they wore.
The society they were part of.
What class they were from.
And today we see the leftist, the globalist, controlling fashion, controlling culture through Hollywood and through their media systems.
But more and more there is a rebellion against that system.
Clothing is a statement.
And it's essential to make that statement by wearing your colors loud and proud, just like I do when I'm out on the streets of America.
So right now, folks, we're going to debut some new shirts and also some of the classics from the InfoWars store.
This is one of our newest shirts.
It's a limited edition.
I'm calling it InfoWars In Your Face.
It's a navy blue shirt, really high quality, feels great, fits great, with a big red InfoWars.com right in the center.
On the shoulder, InfoWars.com and an American flag on a blue background.
And remember, WikiLeaks shows.
That organizations like CNN are owned by foreign multinational corporations hell-bent on enslaving this country.
So when you expose them as fake news, you're doing your patriotic duty.
And you're exercising your First Amendment in defiance of their bullying, garbage, and tyranny.
And on the back, Infowars.com is the standard of real news.
And of course, this classic says it all.
Need I say more?
You want to have a political message out there?
You want to state the facts of Americana and stand against the horrors we've seen in Russia, China, North Korea, Venezuela?
Then this is the shirt for you at Infowarsstore.com.
Now, if you want to be a little bit more low-key, this is a brand new shirt, hot off the press, with the same great fabric that's Infowars with an American flag.
This is more stealth.
If you just want to basically reach out to other fellow travelers that are awake to the worldwide revolution against the globalists.
And this shirt, The Spirit of 1776, is a great addition to do just that.
At Infowarsstore.com, we've got more than 15 versions of different Molon Labe or Come and Take It in good old-fashioned English t-shirts.
And right here on the back, the good old Don't Tread on Me, Infowars.com to spread the word.
I designed this baby.
It's an AK-47 saying, come and take it.
And then the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The Second Amendment is the type that fills up the image of the firearm.
This shirt is the second oldest shirt in our arsenal.
It's been around about 19 years.
It's the classic Infowars tyranny response team shirt.
And of course, we've seen the NFL taking a knee during the national anthem to basically piss on the American flag.
That's disrespectful.
But when you fly the American flag upside down and explain under U.S. code that the country is under crisis, it's a symbol of respect for the nation and the flag to point out the country is in crisis.
Our republic is in distress.
Ask me why.
This baby is a classic year-round.
Good old camouflage with the day-glow orange hunting.
Don't tread on me.
Infowars.
Oh, and this is my birthday suit.
Mama gave me this one, so I guess I better go ahead and put another shirt on.
I call this the Patriot Rock and Roll shirt.
I think the image tells you what it's all about.
It's all about freedom.
It's all about rugged individualism.
Resist tyranny.
Made in America, 1776. And I've been showing you the fronts of these great shirts.
The backs are really cool.
Look at that back.
That is pure Americana.
And I almost forgot.
We've got dozens and dozens of great limited edition ball caps available the day globe.
Perfect.
Now when you're out jogging or out walking the dog down the road, and this is my favorite ball cap of over 20 ball caps we put out.
It's got the nice patch Infowars.com with a don't tread on me.
This my friends is the ball cap that I wear when I'm out and about in town.
The crew absolutely loves it as well.
Export Selection