All Episodes
Previous Next
July 26, 2017 - InfoWars Special Reports
01:09:02
Expert Reveals Tampering in JFK Assassination Photos
Source
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Time Text
The Pentagon war planners have rightfully said that 90% of modern warfare is informational.
That's why it's more important than ever that all of you watching subscribe on YouTube, like us on Facebook, and follow us on Twitter at RealAlexJones, because InfoWars is the front line of the fight.
And without your help and support, we will fail.
With your support and with your prayers, we will be victorious against the globalists together.
This is Dr. Jerome Corsi, and I'm here today with Ralph Sinke.
Ralph is with the Oswald Innocence Project.
I'm really honored to have Ralph in the studio today.
Ralph, thanks for joining us.
Thank you, Jerry, and I'm glad to be here.
Let me point out that it's the Oswald Innocence Campaign.
Campaign, thank you.
And Ralph is, I consider Ralph to be one of the most distinguished of the researchers today in the JFK assassination field.
Ralph, in creating this entire website and blog, has brought to the fore an issue that has been around really since the assassination happened.
This Alton's sixth photograph we're going to look at of the actual shooting occurring.
And you can see a figure in the doorway.
And from the very beginning, first day of the assassination, that photograph was published and people said, that's Oswald.
Well, I'll tell you an interesting story about that, Jerry.
I received an email from a woman in Russia who told me that her uncle knew Oswald when he lived in Russia, and he's dead now, but the moment he saw the Alchins photo, the first thing he said is, that's Alec.
And Alec is the name that Oswald went by when he was in Russia.
He didn't go by Lee.
He had people calling him Alec, and even Marina called him Alec when he was in Russia.
But he immediately recognized him as the man he knew.
And it's been a controversy ever since.
Now, Ruff, how did you get this started?
How did you decide to create the blog and the website on Facebook and also the blog?
And the organization itself.
Yes, the organization has grown to be quite large.
Yes, I believe we are the largest JFK assassination research group in the world.
It was founded in...
2012 by me and Dr. James Fetzer and a couple of others.
And now we have grown to 88 members, senior members.
And the senior members are those who, like yourself, gave us permission to put their image on our website and a short bio of them.
And these are all featured on the homepage of the Oswald Innocent's campaign, which is at oswald-innocent.com.
We look like a rugby team there, and I like to think of us as the defense for Oswald and for the JFK assassination truth.
And I was quite honored.
I mean, I've been following your work for years, and then I decided just a few weeks ago I was going to join the campaign, and I was honored that you and the others accepted me into the group, and I'm looking forward to working with you now to really promote.
The research you've developed.
Well, we are honored to have you, Jerry.
And obviously, this association is already bearing fruit since we're doing this show now.
And it is a very prominent one.
So I'm very grateful to have you.
And I'm very hopeful for the future that this is going to change the JFK landscape as we move forward.
Great.
Well, let's get into it.
If we can show, I guess, let's start with the first.
Let's start with the first image.
This is the James Alchin's photo in its entirety.
I will point out that there are a few people who wonder if maybe even this is a crop because it seems like as far back as Alchins was shooting that he might have captured a higher level on those buildings, the Altex building and the book depository.
Did they crop it a little bit to maybe take out a shooter or something?
That's a possibility.
But this is the biggest rendition of the photo that we know of.
And this was a very, very prized photo by the authorities, and the reason why is because it seems to be telling the story that they were selling.
And by that I mean that you can see the president reacting to being shot.
He's bringing his hands up to his neck, and of course he was shot in the throat, and Jackie is leaning over towards him, and she's putting her hand on his arm, and she's tending to him.
And then, meanwhile, behind them, you've got the Secret Service car, and two of the agents are turned around, and they're peering back at the book depository.
And when they wrote the caption for this photograph, they actually said that the Secret Service agents were looking back at the source of the shots.
So it seemed to be very, very valuable to the establishment to make this photo work.
Even though Oswald was in it.
So they knew that, but they did some things to it to try to take him out.
And we're going to go through those one by one.
That photo, the Alchins photo, it was taken really at the instant.
I mean, Jack Kennedy has just been hit.
You can see his hands coming up to his throat.
I mean, Alchins was standing over, I guess, on the south side of the, across the road.
Yeah, he was down at basically the bottom of Elm Street.
The bottom of Elm Street.
Right.
And shooting back.
Right.
And he just, he managed to capture really this historic incident when the first shots were fired.
Right.
So, and this was the thing that made it such an iconic photograph.
I would have to wonder why they didn't consider destroying it, considering that Oswald was in it, but I think that they just...
They were so arrogant that they just felt like they had to have this photo, even though it had a very dangerous element in it.
But anyway, let's go to the next picture, please.
All right, this is a closer crop.
It's showing you that doorway area.
And right next to the white column on the left is the figure known as the Doorway Man.
And you can see, even from this distance, that he's got a long-sleeved shirt on.
It's unbuttoned and it's sprawled open.
And the white that we're seeing is the white of his T-shirt.
And that is the figure that has been the center of the controversy.
We're talking about a 35 millimeter negative photograph.
I mean, this is a tiny negative.
Well, let me point out that the entire Alchin's photo was probably about this big.
And the doorway man was probably, you know.
A tiny, tiny fraction of an inch, just probably maybe a centimeter.
And so when we look at this, we're looking at a very big blow-up.
It's a big, huge blow-up.
And naturally, there is some distortion when you blow up images because you're stretching the pixels.
But this is the best image that we have.
The one that's on the screen right now, that is the clearest, sharpest.
Most focused image of the doorway man that we have.
But I want to point out something.
I want you to look at the man that is standing next to him on his left, our right.
I'm referring to the man who's got his hands atop his head.
And what he's doing there is visoring his eyes.
And let me tell you something.
I stood in that spot in late November.
On a warm, sunny day.
And in Texas, even in late November, you can get a lot of heat generated.
And I know how hot it was standing there, and I know how blinding the sun was.
And so I can understand why he put his hands up on his head like this in order to block the light.
And I want you to notice that he has absolutely no head.
That we're not seeing...
Anything.
He's like the headless horseman, except without a horse.
That's the man in the white.
Yes, the man in the white on the right.
Holding his hands to the visor.
No head in that picture.
No head in that picture.
Now his elbows are way out, so his arms aren't blocking the light at all.
The blight can still get to his head, to his face.
The only thing that's casting any shadow are his hands atop his head.
And it is absolutely impossible that they would blacken out his entire face.
There's no other image like this in the entire history of photography.
This is one of a kind.
It isn't real.
It isn't natural.
And what happened here is that they blackened out his face precisely because he was the real Billy Lovelady.
Billy Lovelady is the man that they were going to claim was the doorway man in lieu of Oswald.
And Billy Lovelady was another employee.
He was another employee of the book depository.
He had a superficial resemblance to...
Not as much as people think.
I mean, you know, these guys, they really didn't look that much alike.
For example, consider the difference in size.
Oswald was 5'9 and only 131 pounds.
Right.
Now, to give you an idea how skinny that is, you can see that I'm pretty lean.
But I'm 5'6", and even I weigh more than Oswald did.
I mean, I'm 135 pounds.
So he was 5'9", which is 3 inches taller than me, and he weighed, you know, 4 pounds less than I do.
So he was a very, very thin guy.
Meanwhile, Lovelady was 5'8", which was 1 inch shorter than Oswald, and he weighed 170 pounds.
And we have his weight.
The FBI took his weight.
They put him on a scale, so we know that's how much he weighed.
So he was basically an inch shorter and 40 pounds heavier than Oswald.
So how much alike could they actually be when you consider that contrast?
So what we have here is on our left, that's Lee Harvey Oswald.
And what he's doing there is he is clasping his hands.
And this was a habit that he had.
And we have many images of him doing that.
In fact, even at the last moment of his conscious life when he was shot in the garage, That he was clasping his hands just as he was doing there.
And the way he did it, and I'm going to try to show you this, but he would take his left hand and he would clasp it over his right wrist, and then he would stand there.
And that was his habit.
That's the way he stood.
He was standing that way there, and he stood that way many times in the images that were taken in the last two days of his life.
But let's go back to that image again.
On the right is Billy Lovelady, and you can see that he's a lot stockier than Oswald.
That's the figure in white, you're saying?
The figure in white, and he's about one inch shorter than Oswald, so that pans out, too.
And that is exactly what we're seeing there.
We're seeing them standing side by side.
Well, there's probably maybe a foot and a half between them.
Lee Harvey Oswald on our left.
And Billy Lovelady on our right.
Now, I personally went to Dealey Plaza, Jerry, to prove that the image of Billy Lovelady is a false image with the lack of a face, that the physics would not allow such a blackening out of the face, that it's artificial.
So go to the next image and we'll see that.
November 17, 2012. And that's me on the left standing in the position of the doorway man.
And on the right in the white shirt is the man who is the proxy for Billy Lovelady where he's visoring his eyes about the same.
And this was taken at 12.30 p.m.
the same time on that day so that we're basically correctly reproducing all of the light conditions.
That existed in the taking of the Alchins photo.
And as you can see, the man still has a face.
The hands can only cast shadow for just a few inches.
They don't blacken out the entire face.
And I consider this to be proof that the Alchins photo was altered.
And it's a very important point to make, Jerry.
It's a key point because what you're going to be proving here is that Certain of the physical, what we see, like the shading of the eyes, was not natural.
Not natural.
Wasn't there.
They did it to the photo.
And there are other alterations that we're going to discuss.
And I may ask them to go back to that photo.
But let me just briefly mention what the time parameters were.
The photo was taken at 12.30 p.m.
The first public showing of it.
Was at 6.30 p.m.
Eastern Time, which was 5.30 p.m.
Central Time, exactly five hours after it was taken.
Walter Cronkite showed it on the CBS Evening News.
That was the first public showing.
So that left a window of five hours that they had to alter the photo.
Now, let me just say that because there are naysayers, I've got a lot of adversaries.
And what they say...
When I point out this proof that the photo was altered, is that, well, it couldn't have been altered because they got it, there was no time, that they sent it to the newspapers in half an hour, things like that.
Well, I want to say something that my friend and colleague, Dr. James Fetzer, has said, that when you see evidence of alteration, That itself is proof that the time and opportunity to make the alterations existed.
Right.
It's very much like if you were walking through the woods and all of a sudden you get to a cabbage garden and you see all these neatly arranged cabbage plants and you know that cabbage just doesn't grow spontaneously in the woods.
Well, you know somebody had the time and opportunity to go there and do that.
You know that just from seeing the cabbages.
Well, it's the same way here.
When we see the alteration, when we demonstrate that that face was blackened out, it proves that they had the time to alter the photo.
And this is a very important point.
I want to focus on it as well because what we're dealing with is what today we call the deep state.
I mean, it's the apparatus of the government which is going to create a propaganda story, a lie.
That they're then going to sell to the public.
And I think what's, Ralph, particularly impressive about your research and what you've done in launching this project is to make it clear that the whole deep state operates.
So the picture you're seeing is designed to make you come to a certain conclusion.
And it just gets worse and worse as we proceed.
All right.
Now, this is the first image of...
Lee Harvey Oswald being compared to the doorway man.
And I want to go through this picture in great detail.
I'm going to discuss point by point all the matching elements of it.
But let me say first of all that this goes way beyond just two guys that look sort of alike.
Yeah, they look kind of similar.
No, no, no.
This is a spot-on match.
There is absolutely nothing that...
Fails to correlate here between these two men.
And I'm speaking of both the man and the clothing.
And I want to emphasize how important that is, because the way you have to look at it is this.
There's a big, vast world of men out there, and they're all different ages and sizes and races and colors and forms.
And then there's a big world of clothes out there, and they're all different styles and colors and purposes and utilities.
And so when you get the man right, and then you also get the clothes right, it's like winning the lottery twice, Jerry.
That's what it's like.
And I can give you a mathematical example of that.
You know, for instance, that if you had to pick one lottery number right, you know, and it's a number from 1 to 45, you know that the odds of doing that are 1 in 45, right?
I mean, that's simple.
Okay.
What are the odds of getting two numbers right?
You know?
Much more difficult.
Much, much more difficult.
It's not one in 90. I know what it is.
It jumps to one in 1,980.
In other words, almost 2,000.
So to get that second number right, it goes from one in 45 to almost one in 2,000.
Right.
And that's what we've done here because the man matches, the clothes match, and you have to remember that any one of those men...
Can be wearing any one of those clothes.
So when you get them both right, you have got a mathematical probability that takes it to the stratosphere.
Let's go back to that image because I want to go through some points here one by one, and we're going to start at the top.
We're going to compare the eyes.
Now what we have here is eyes that are apparently the same shape, well, what you might call almond-shaped eyes.
They appear to have about the same depth.
Where the prominence of the cheek is about the same and the depth of the eyes looks very well matched.
Another matching point is the distance between the eyes and the eyebrows.
Now that's something that fluctuates a lot in people.
Some people have a big distance between the eyes and the eyebrows.
In this case, there's a small distance.
His eyebrows were pretty close to his eyes and it's exactly the same on both of them.
So those eyes match.
Let's go to the nose.
Now, Oswald had what I call a pyramidal-shaped nose.
It was a very symmetrical nose.
And he also had large nostrils, and the nostrils tended to flare.
Now, in the image on the left, it's a little hard to see, but on the right, you see the shadow underneath his nose, and that reflects the large nostril.
Now, there's a difference in perspective here, because on the right, We're mainly seeing the right side of his nose because it was taken from that angle.
On the left, we're seeing a pretty much balanced view of his entire nose.
But I want to make a point because I know, Jerry, that you're in touch with Larry Rivera, who is the chairman of the Oswald Innocence Campaign.
And Larry did an overlay in which he took an image of Oswald and he put it over the doorway man.
And it happened to be taken from the same angle as the doorway man.
And what he got was a seamless reproduction where it fits like a glove.
The mouth.
Now I want to point out that Oswald had the habit of pursing his lips.
He just had this habit of...
Of pressing his lips together, it was a nervous habit.
He was doing it there in the doorway, he was doing it there, and he did it many times in the images that we have of him.
He had thin lips, and when he pressed them together, it made them look even thinner.
But what we have there is a very perfect correlation of the lips.
He's pursing them on both sides.
It was his habit, and there's absolutely no disconnect there concerning his lips.
And then if we move down to the chin, Oswald had a square chin, but it was narrowly square, meaning it wasn't real wide, but he did have basically a square chin, and we're seeing that reproduced on both sides of the screen as well.
So every facial feature matches.
But wait, there's one more that is of utmost importance, and that is the ear.
Now, we cannot use the ear.
Well, we cannot use his left ear, which is on our right, because that one is distorted on the doorway man.
But on his right ear, which is left to us, his right ear, we can compare that to Oswald's ear, his right ear, and it is a perfect match in terms of the shape of the ear, the way the cartilage of the ear, the helix, comes around and tapers down to a rather small lobule, which is the...
Small, fleshy part of the ear.
I'm a retired chiropractor.
I was going to mention that.
I have, you might say, a medical background, and I know human anatomy, and so I can talk about these things.
But the size of the ear, the shape of the ear, and also the pitch of the ear, meaning the angle at which it's coming out from the head, is exactly the same on both of them.
And we know that the ears are very distinctive.
They say that the ears are as distinctive as the fingerprint.
So when the ears match on a person, my goodness, that is a very telltale sign that it's the same guy, and we have a very excellent matching of the ears there.
Now here's something that most people wouldn't think about, but I do because I was a chiropractor, and that is the neck.
If you look at that image...
You're going to see that the length of the neck is very, very well matched on both of them.
And the length of the neck is something that fluctuates a great deal in human beings.
You've got people with long necks.
And if it's a man with a long neck, we say that he has a giraffe-like neck.
If it's a woman with a long neck, we say that she has a swan-like neck.
And then you've got guys with burly shoulders.
Practically no neck at all, where it seems like the head is sitting on the shoulders.
But in this case, we have a perfect match, and it's a very individual, distinctive thing of the length of the neck.
If we were to estimate there's size and weight, perfect correlation.
There's absolutely no disconnect there.
If we were going to, we can see the same slender build, aesthetic build.
And he seems to be about the same size man.
Now, let's get to the clothes, because the clothes also are a perfect match.
We're seeing both of them wearing a long-sleeved outer shirt.
It is unbuttoned.
It is sprawled open.
Now, on Oswald, he was in handcuffs, and his hands were kind of pressed to his chest, and so he was holding his shirt together.
So you don't see as much of a sprawling of the shirt on him as you do.
On the doorway then, but in other images, you do see the exact same look that we see on the right.
But I want you to focus on his right collar, which is on our left, on both of them.
You see a triangular-shaped flap of the collar, and then below that, there's a small vertical furl.
That's what I would call, or you could even call it a curl of the material, but that's the way his shirt behaved on that side.
He had a collar, and then he had a small vertical furrow that occurred beneath it.
And we're seeing that on both of them.
It is a perfect match of the right collar.
Then they're both wearing a white t-shirt, and I want you to notice on both of them that the margin of the t-shirt is very low.
It looks like a V-shaped opening to the t-shirt.
Now, we know how that happened on Oswald because we have information from one of his Marine buddies whose name was Anthony Botello.
He said that Oswald had the habit of putting his fingers into his T-shirt.
Now, I'm doing it on my outer shirt, but just imagine that this was a T-shirt, and he would just rest his hand there, and he would stretch the T-shirt, and he would deform it.
He would actually deform the T-shirt.
And that's what happened to this T-shirt.
It's a very old T-shirt.
And because of this habit he had, it was stretched out of shape, and we're seeing it on both of them.
That's why it looks V-shaped, because Oswald stretched it into that condition.
And this was a habit that only Oswald had.
Lovelady didn't have this habit.
We're seeing Oswald's very unique hand-crafted T-shirt there, one that he deformed into a V-shaped T-shirt, and we're seeing it on both of them.
Now, I want you to notice on Oswald, meaning the guy on our left, the left side of his shirt, which is on our right, that you're seeing this long fold of the shirt, and it makes it look like it's a jacket.
Do you notice that it almost looks more like a jacket than a shirt?
And I'll tell you something.
There were quite a few people who saw Oswald after After things started going down, and about half of them described that garment as a jacket.
In fact, the very first person who saw Oswald after the shooting was Officer Marion Baker.
He saw him on the second floor in the lunchroom, and he described that shirt as a light brown jacket.
Now, why did they call it a jacket?
Well, it's because, if you look at my jacket, I've got this lapel that...
It's built into the jacket.
And Oswald's shirt, if you'll go back to that again, please, it folded over the same way.
It took the form of a jacket.
Now, the reason it did that is because that was a Russian shirt.
Oswald brought that shirt back with him from Russia.
It was not an American shirt.
They've been lying to us about that shirt from the beginning and showing us shirts that were not that shirt.
This shirt was made differently than American shirts.
American shirts are made with stiff collars and also with a stiff piece of material that goes down the center of the shirt that is known as a plaquette.
And that stiff material prevents the shirt from folding over the way Oswald's shirt folded over.
His did it, ours don't.
And that is the sign.
Of a very differently made shirt that is not a standard American shirt.
It behaved more like a jacket the way it folded over.
Now, they knew that if they had allowed Oswald's shirt to appear on the right, go back again, please, to appear and look the same as it does on Oswald, that it would have been all over from the beginning.
The fat lady would have been singing.
What we have there is that we have the collar of his shirt, and then we have beneath that, you can't see it from this distance, but there's a little button flap there.
I mean, a little button loop.
I meant to say a loop.
There's a button loop there, and the purpose of the button loop was to secure a button that was hidden under the right collar of his shirt.
And then below that, you've got this lapel that formed from the shirt folding over.
Now, they had to cover that up, and the way they covered it up was by slapping that other guy in there.
The guy next to him, who seems to be growing out of him, who seems to be fused with him, is a figure that we call Black Tie Man, because you can see the black tie.
But what I'm telling you is that they put that image in there.
That is another alteration, Jerry.
They put him in there to hide the unique construction of Oswald's shirt.
He could not possibly be there.
And you can't, I mean, Oswald's shoulder looks like it's missing.
Yeah, it's flashed.
Oswald's shoulder is flashed.
And again, I'm calling on my chiropractic background, but I know a little bit about And in that particular image, Oswald doesn't have a left shoulder.
It is slashed.
It is cut off.
So on our right, you're not seeing a complete shoulder there.
What you're seeing is A slashed shoulder.
And so what we have there is an impossible situation in which Oswald is cutting off the other guy's right shoulder and the other guy is cutting off Oswald's left shoulder.
So they're each blocking each other, which is impossible.
And they put him in there precisely to cover up the unique construction.
Of Oswald's very unusual shirt.
But there is a telltale sign.
This is the last thing I have to say about this.
So go back to it one last time before we move on.
If you look at the right side of his shirt, meaning on our left, I want you to notice how fine the edge looks.
It really looks very sharp.
It looks fine.
It looks thin.
But if you look on the other side, I want you to notice that it looks beveled.
It looks thicker.
And it looks more rounded.
The edge itself looks more rounded.
Well, the reason why it looks rounded is because it was rounded.
It was folded over.
We're seeing that folded over effect that we see on Oswald, and that's why the margin there, the edge, looks thicker and rounder and beveled compared to the other side.
So that's the telltale sign that We're seeing the same image of a folded lapel that's formed on Oswald's very unusual shirt.
All right, let's move to the next image.
All right, now, this is the same image.
However, and I was wondering if you were going to mention it, Jerry, but I cut off the top of their heads in that other image.
Go back to it just a second, just so we can remind the audience.
You see, I did that on purpose.
And the reason I did it is because there's a very, very different look once you look at the very top of the heads.
Go back now to the following one.
Okay, now what we're seeing here now is two very different crowns.
That's the word I use to describe it, a crown.
On the right, the hairline is very different.
It's more receding.
His hair is shorter.
He's obviously balder.
But in addition to that, the whole shape of the top of the head is different.
It's very oval.
It's very round.
I would even describe it as simian.
Whereas on Oswald, his hair was longer.
He had less recession.
And the shape of the top of his head is more geometric.
It's more pitched and bulging.
He had a larger cranium.
And it's a very different shape to the top of his head.
Now, there are only two possibilities here, Jerry.
Either Oswald and Lovelady were identical twins from the forehead down, and yet they were different from the forehead up, and the only way that they could be made to look like totally identical twins, all they had to do was put on a baseball hat.
If you put a baseball hat on them to cover up the top of the head, then they would look like...
Perfectly matching twins, like they were identical twins.
But if you took the hat off, now you see the top of the head is different.
So how do we account for that?
The fact that from the eyes down, they are perfectly matched, but yet from the forehead up, they are entirely different.
Well, the fact is, Jerry, that they imposed a different crown.
That is what they did to turn him into Billy Lovelady.
that a piece of love lady's head and they slapped it on and that's what they did and it was a very clever thing to do because the fact is that your hairline frames your face it shapes your entire face that's the frame and you can majorly change a person's look by just doing that changing um the top of their head now uh well this was not the first time they did it jerry They altered that photo,
but it wasn't the first time.
I am Alex Jones.
And for 22 years, I have been working as hard as I can to be a modern Paul Revere, to alert the people of the United States and the world to the fact that a private corporate world government is being established that is committed to authoritarian rule and to impoverishing the people to alert the people of the United States and the world to the fact that a private corporate And to impoverishing the people as a tool of economic and political control.
We are struggling for a Renaissance, open, free society that is classically liberal in the system of Thomas Jefferson versus an authoritarian system with all of its slick Hollywood corporate packaging that seeks to dumb down the population and complete our journey into absolute tyranny.
The people of the world have listened.
In fact, the sleeping giant that is Humanity is awakening.
And that's why now, more than ever, it is critical for everyone watching and listening to understand you are the front line of the fight against the globalists.
And we are so close to beating them and moving forward with a shot at a decent future.
InfoWars is the tip of the spear.
It's the spearhead itself.
And I need you, the viewers and listeners more than ever, to realize how important you are and to spread the articles, the videos, the links to everyone you know on a continual basis.
It's a labor of love.
It is the animating contest of liberty that Thomas Jefferson talked about.
Subscribe to our YouTube channels.
Share the links.
Visit InfoWars.com and check out the stories, the reports, the documentation, and understand.
That the reason we're under globalist attack is because we are over the target.
As most of you already know, I am a voracious consumer of news and information.
And in the last four or five years doing more and more research, I came across the fact that the elite, the establishment, the science community is fully aware of the fact that our ancient ancestors In many cases, had much better nutrition than we do today.
And our ancient ancestors sought out the bones of the animals that they were hunting, killing, and then processing.
And that they went for the bones first, knowing that they were full of the vital essence in the marrow, but also in the bone structure itself.
And so I set out, working with the top formulator in the country, to develop Caveman.
But to not just have concentrated bone broth from chicken, but seven other superfood ingredients known for cleansing and supercharging the body at the same time.
Bottom line, when you purchase Caveman at InfoWarsStore.com, you're supporting the broadcast in true independent media that's fighting for the future of this country to be a free nation.
So it's a win-win.
But you really should try it for yourself to see what it's done for myself and so many others.
InfoWars isn't just fighting the globalists.
We're getting results.
And we're expanding in the face of the complete media assault and winning because of your support.
Because of you praying for the broadcast.
Because of you buying the products and financially supporting the transmissions.
And because you spread the articles and the videos and the links and tell folks about our local affiliates.
Caveman is back in stock.
People absolutely love it.
So please secure your caveman today at InfoWarsLife.com or by calling toll-free 888-253-3139.
Well, this was not the first time they did it, Jerry.
They altered that photo, but it wasn't the first time.
Go to the next image.
I'm going to show you one that they did even before that.
That is what we call the backyard photo.
It's supposed to be of Lee Harvey Oswald.
He's holding the rifle.
He's wearing the pistol.
And he's holding up a socialist newspaper.
Now, the Dallas police and the FBI showed that image to Oswald.
And what he said to them was, that's not me.
They moved my face over to the body of another man.
He told them that he knew how to do it.
He said, if you take me to a photo lab, I'll show you how to do it.
But that is not me.
Now, Oswald was not a stupid man.
If he had posed for that picture, if he knew that was him in the picture, he never would have lied about it because it wasn't a crime to take that picture.
And even though it looked bad, it wasn't incriminating.
Even if he had taken that picture, that didn't mean that he shot Kennedy.
So if he had taken that picture, he never would have lied about it.
He would have said, okay, yeah, I took that picture.
Big deal.
He wasn't going to say that because he didn't take that picture.
They made that picture.
They put his face in that photo, Jerry.
And also, Oswald, we finally got the interrogation notes, some of the notes that were missing for decades.
And Oswald said he was outside.
Out with Bill Shelley in front.
That's where he said he was.
That was his alibi.
That's where he was when Kennedy was being shot down.
And we have it in writing.
And it was 1996 that these first surfaced, so over 30 years after the assassination, one of the biggest discoveries ever in JFK assassination research.
When they brought that face over, they did something very clever.
They didn't bring the whole face.
They left the chin of the original man.
That chin is too wide to be Oswald.
That is what I call an...
Anvil-like chin.
It's like the anvil, you know, that you would use, you know, a blacksmith or something.
It is a really super wide chin, and I already told you that Oswald had a square chin, but it was narrowly square.
So that is not Oswald's chin, but it was very clever of them to do it that way, because if they put the whole face, then they would have been creating a new interface between the head and the neck.
But by leaving the chin, They left the original interface, and then they just built up from there.
So it was very smart.
It created a much more subtle effect by doing it that way.
So what I'm saying is that when they doctored the doorway man photo, they did the same thing, except they grabbed an even smaller piece.
They grabbed just the top part of the forehead, probably somewhere right around the middle of the forehead.
And I brought the photo that they used.
I found it.
I have the photo.
And I'm going to show you that it's a spot-on match.
But that is the one thing that they did to turn him into Billy Lovelady.
And everything else about the doorway match is a spot-on, perfect match to Lee Harvey Oswald.
And I want to say, because keep our mind on time, I want to make sure you get through all the images.
But this type of analysis is critical.
This is where you...
Catch the deep state.
You've got to be able to go through these details because there is an ability to create an image that you are seeing that's not the reality.
And that's the importance of this doctoring of the evidence.
This one I like very much because not only do they look the same and dress the same, but we're seeing what seems to be the same stare, the same look, the same focus.
Again, the same length of the neck, the same kind of a horse-shaped face.
It's a very, very perfect match, and the look of it is very perfect.
Again, we have the opportunity to match the ears, except in this case, since we don't see Oswald's right ear very well, we can borrow his left ear, because fortunately, ears are very symmetrical on people.
They're generally very symmetrical.
So by looking at Oswald's left ear, go back.
Which is, I mean, yeah, on our right, and comparing it to the doorman's right ear on our left, it is a perfect spot-on match.
It's like a fingerprint.
Same ear, same man.
Notice, Oswald did not smoke cigarettes.
He did not.
And there's no cigarette.
Place, you know, your shirt, you put your cigarettes in the pocket.
Right, and he would not have had a need for that, indeed.
Yeah, that shirt doesn't have any pocket for cigarettes.
There's no pocket on that shirt.
I brought this one because the image of Oswald on the right was taken from approximately the same angle, where we're seeing mainly the right side of his face, and they match very well.
Again, I want to remind you, there's a lot of distortion on what is to us the right side of the doorway man's face.
You have to try to ignore all that.
But what we're seeing, they're a very good correlation of the eyes, the ear, the nose.
Again, the flared nostril, which you can see very well on Oswald on the right.
Look at the pursed lips.
Can you see how Oswald is pressing his lips together?
It was a very, very deep habit that he had.
The length of the neck, perfect match.
I mean, that is beautiful.
It doesn't get better than that.
Jerry, I can find two pictures of you that don't match as well as those two.
I'm sure that escapes.
And the same is true of me.
Okay, let's go to the next image.
Okay, now we're going to start talking about Billy Lovelady, his images, but it's very complicated because there's so many phony images of him.
There's lots of them, and these are three.
I'm going to talk about this, and it's kind of funny.
The guy on the right looks to me like he's some kind of Olympic weightlifter.
He's got an arm that's as thick as my thigh.
He's got a very large head, very large ears, and his hair is combed straight back.
It reminds me of Robert De Niro in the movie The Deer Hunter.
So I got in the habit of referring to him as De Niro Lovelady.
Now the guy in the middle is supposed to be the same lovelady at the same moment in time, but he looks puny and scrawny.
He looks like he never picked up anything heavy in his entire life.
Unlike the guy on the right, he doesn't have his shirt sprawled open.
You notice the guy on the right has got his shirt sprawled open.
It's very weird, though.
It's got a triangular shape, the opening, and that's impossible because a shirt opening is going to be triangular because that's how it unfolds.
It develops from the last secured button.
So I don't know how they came up with that image.
These are images of Lovelady.
When were those pictures taken?
All right.
The image in the middle and on the right were taken supposedly at the Dallas Police Department at about 2 o'clock p.m.
So it was an hour and a half after the assassination.
And the image on the left, which I'm going to get to in a moment, was taken about 20 minutes after the assassination outside the book depository at a time that Billy Lovelady wasn't even there.
From his own testimony, we know that he left immediately.
He went to the railway yard and was looking around, as a lot of people did.
He and Bill Shelley did that together.
Then they went around to the back of the building, went in through the back door, and they were in there for a long time.
There was no chance that he was standing outside at the time that picture was taken.
Up on the guy in the middle, to me, he looks like he's about 40 years old.
Billy Lovelady was 26. In fact, if you told me that that guy had a son who was 26, I wouldn't argue with you.
But let's get to the guy on the left, because he's the funniest of all.
He's the guy that Jim Fetzer called Gorilla Man.
Look at those prominent brow bones, the way they overhang his eyes.
Look at his slanted forehead.
You know, most people have a forehead that goes up and then they have a head, you know, a cranium that goes across so that there's sort of a semi, you know, rectangular formation there.
But this guy just had a ski slope curve going from the back of his head all the way down to his eyes.
Very unusual shape.
And it's very Neanderthal, frankly, and that's why Jim Fetzer called him a gorilla man.
And he's smoking in the picture on the left.
He's got a cigarette up to his mouth.
You can see it in some of the other images.
He may have been smoking right there, but you're absolutely right, Jerry, that you see, this is a frame from a six-second clip that was taken, and he was smoking.
He was smoking, and he's got the cigarettes in his pocket.
You can see again on the...
Sitting down image, there's the flap there.
Well, here's the thing.
What's strange about it is this.
You can see the cigarettes in his pocket, and you can also see the cigarettes in the middle guy's pocket.
I don't see the cigarettes in the pocket on the left, though.
But what he's got there is a pocket flap.
Yes.
He has a flap that covers the pocket.
The other two don't have the pocket flap, and that's the reason we can see the cigarettes, because there's no pocket flap.
Closing the pocket.
So how can the same shirt have a pocket flap and not have a pocket flap?
These are three different men and none of them are Billy Lovelady.
And what we're going to is, I mean, these are the images that have been used to say this was Billy Lovelady in this shirt.
Right.
Now the image on the left...
It's the most widely used image of Billy Lovelady that there is, even though he definitely is not Billy Lovelady.
In fact, listen, I'm very glad that we stopped a moment because there's something else I need to tell you as Dr. Sinke, the chiropractor.
The man on the left there has got a condition known as forward neck syndrome.
It's a clinical condition in which his neck...
It's got a very unusual and abnormal forward inclination.
It's going more forward than it is up.
Now, the man on the right had a very vertical neck.
You can see that his neck is going straight up and his head has a very good bearing as a result of it.
But what's happening to the man on the left is his neck is going forward instead of up, but then the body compensates for that by...
Basically, by tweaking the head back at the very top joint.
There's a joint at the very top of the neck called the atlanto-occipital joint.
And basically, what the body will do is pinch the head back at that top joint.
It's a very unhealthy situation.
It predisposes to cervical arthritis.
This is the kind of guy that was going to develop neck pain by the time he was middle-aged.
It was not a condition Lovelady had.
It was not a condition that Lovelady had.
It was not a condition that either of these other two men had.
So in closing then, none of these, no two of these men were the same man, and none of them was Billy Lovelady.
They're all false images of Billy Lovelady.
These are the images that are going to be used.
Now go to the next image, because this next image is an image of Billy Lovelady.
That's really him.
There's no doubt about it.
However, it's still not a reliable image.
And the reason why is because of the source.
The source of that image was the FBI. They took that image precisely to sell the idea that he was the doorway man.
Do you notice that his shirt is unbuttoned and sprawled open?
They told him to do that.
They were trying to duplicate the look of the doorway man.
And I really think that somebody...
Pushed the shirt open and gave it a little help to kind of spread out a little bit.
You notice that Lovelady is standing with his hands clasped behind his back.
He's standing with his arms behind his back.
And you remember that I showed you at the beginning that the doorway man was standing Oswald's way with his hands clasped in front.
You know, clasping them in front of his body.
So, poor Lovelady, he didn't even know the gig.
He was supposed to stand with his hands clasped in front, but that wasn't his habit.
He had the other habit of clasping behind, so he had it all wrong, even as he was trying to...
And that photograph, the FBI said to come back in the shirt you wore the day of the assassination.
Yeah, they did.
And we have it in writing.
I'm going to show it to you in writing.
They said that he was wearing those very clothes.
Now, if he was wearing a short-sleeved striped shirt, how could he be the doorway man?
You can see it's short-sleeved, it's striped.
That's not the shirt of the man in the doorway.
We have it in writing that he stated that he wore those clothes on November 22, 1963. But before we leave this photo, two things I have to point out.
Look at his hair.
They spiked his hair.
They gave him more hair than he actually had.
He was actually a lot bolder than that.
And I'm going to be able to show you because I have another image of him that is reliable.
And keep mindful of time.
It is the one and only reliable image that we have of him.
And secondly, his ears.
They doctored his ears and I'm going to show you that too.
So this simply is the FBI document in which...
They say that he stated that he wore the vertically striped shirt and blue jeans, the ones that we just saw.
I brought this letter.
There's also a second letter in which they said the same thing.
So we have it in writing twice that Lovelady said that he wore those clothes.
Okay.
All right.
Now, I brought this image because it shows that Lovelady himself pointed out that he was this man with no face.
He was asked to draw an arrow to himself on the photo, and he drew an arrow, and we're seeing the tail of the arrow on the forearm of that man.
Notice that it says, Love Lady's arrow.
Well, most of the arrow was drawn in the black space, and he was told to draw it in the black space, but a little of it overlapped the flesh-colored forearm, fortunately, and so we're seeing it.
The big arrow on the left, It was drawn by Bwell Frazier, and Bwell Frazier surrendered.
They threatened him, they threatened his family, and he was a 19-year-old kid, and he basically told them what they wanted to hear, and he said that it was Love Lady.
But when they asked Love Lady, he refused to say that he was the doorway man, and he drew an arrow to another figure, this figure, to indicate himself.
This is the one and only reliable image of Billy Lovelady that we have in this world.
And the reason why it's reliable is because of the source.
The source was Mark Lane.
Mark Lane risked life and limb to get that photo.
It's unbelievable what he went through.
They were harassing photographers who came to Dallas trying to capture a picture of this guy.
There's even a report of Lovelady getting into a fight.
With a guy on the street who was trying to take his picture.
But Mark Lane got this picture and thank almighty God that he did because this is the only reliable image of Love Lady that we have.
Two things to point out about it right off the bat.
First of all, look how bald he was.
He had a couple of strands of hair on top.
That's it.
All the rest of it is bare scalp.
That is all the hair he had.
This was taken in the winter of 1964, so just a few months after the assassination.
That's the amount of hair he had during the assassination, and it's very little.
He was practically bald on top, even though he was only 26 years old, but that's the reality.
Second thing is, look how his ears are protruding.
This man had...
Protruding ears, and by that I mean he had clinically protruding ears.
In medicine, they refer to it as prominent ears.
He's the kind of guy that today, if his parents took him to a doctor and he was a little kid, they would have thought about doing surgery to get his ears back flush with his head.
I have a cousin, for instance, who has a son who had to go through that surgery because he had protruding ears, and it worked out very well.
He's a handsome young man today.
But this is a severe...
In fact, I can give you the figures.
In medicine, they say if the ears is jutting out anything more than 2 centimeters, which is less than an inch, it's considered clinically protruding.
And that is over 2 centimeters.
He had clinically protruding ears.
And it's very, very significant.
So this is our comparison of Billy Lovelady and the doorway man.
First of all, you notice that...
The love lady on the left is much balder.
And on the right, he's balder than you might say he should be because he's Oswald.
And the reason, what happened here is this.
I told you that they took love lady's head and they moved over the top of it.
But they didn't have this image.
Mark Lane got this image.
They used another image and it was from the 1950s.
And they didn't think about the fact that Lovelady had lost a lot of hair since the 1950s.
He was a rapidly balding young man.
The guys doing the alteration, they didn't know that.
They thought they had a reliable image of him.
So they gave him this image.
And sure enough, the doorway man has Lovelady's hair, but he does not have Lovelady's hair from 1963. He has Lovelady's hair from 1957. So it's the wrong amount of hair.
So that's the first thing.
But the second thing is just look at the ears.
Look at Oswald's right ear on the right where it's flush with his face.
It looks very, very normal.
It looks very ordinary.
And on the left, you've got this Mickey Mouse ear sticking out, widely protruding.
How could that possibly be the same man?
It's just ludicrous.
It is ridiculous to think that that's the same ear that we're looking at.
No two ears could be more unalike than those two ears.
Different hair, different ears.
No way is that the same man.
All right, this is the image that they used to create that new hairline for Oswald.
This image of young Billy Lovelady.
That's him.
It's from about 1957. It was probably an image that was in his Air Force file because Billy Lovelady was in the Air Force.
That's the image that they used, and I want you to notice that it is a spot-on match of not just the amount of balding, the form of the recession, the receding hairline, but also the length of the hair.
Remember that hair is constantly growing, and we're also intermittently cutting it.
So the idea...
That he could have exactly the same hair in 1963 as he had in 1957 as to not only the amount of balding but the length of the hair, the lay of the hair, the cut of the hair, everything about the hair, there's not a thing different about it over a six-year period of time?
I mean, I look at pictures of myself taking over, you know, a couple months' time, and my hair looks very different.
So it's just impossible.
The reason they look so much alike is that they took that image, they took the top part of that head on our left, and they moved it over, and they planted it on Oswald, on the doorway man.
It is the one thing that they did to convert him into Billy Lovelady.
And that's the thing that gave them the confidence that they could tell the world that that's Billy Lovelady.
Because as arrogant as these people were, they weren't arrogant enough to actually just think, well, well, he's obviously Oswald, but we'll tell the people that he's Lovelady and they'll believe us because the dumb rubes will believe anything we tell them.
They weren't quite that arrogant.
They were close, but they weren't quite that arrogant.
They had to do something to actually turn him into Billy Lovelady, and that's the thing that they did.
They slapped him on a new crown, and we're seeing it here.
That is the image that they used.
Okay, this is the final image that I brought, and what this image does is, this is a piece of artwork of my own.
This shows you what...
Oswald and the doorway must have looked like before they tampered with the photo, before they brought over that hairline.
So yeah, that's probably what they started with on the left.
That's what they were looking at.
And then they did their magic.
They did the devil's work to it.
And notice how really different it looks.
I mean, I imagine they felt pretty darn good about themselves after they did that.
They probably felt like, yep, we basically took the Oswald out of him.
And we gave him a big dose of love, ladies, so our worries are over.
I bet you they never dreamed that 53 years later, you and I were going to be on television talking about this, Jerry.
I'm sure they didn't.
But, you know, this is the, again, I think in wrapping it up, the points I want to stress is the, you know, we talk about they did this.
And you've got a combination of CIA. You've got a combination of FBI intelligence agencies working behind the scenes, creating an impression, willing to doctor evidence, willing to go to these extents to present a picture to the public, to tell a narrative that's a lie.
And the lie here is, for the very first hours, we had a photograph of the guy that we were going to frame as the shooter standing in the doorway, where he told in his interrogation that he was standing.
And they destroyed the notes and produced this evidence.
And I want you to comment on that.
Well, Jerry, the way I look at it, it's like we're living in a bizarro world because, you know, every year November rolls around and they have some coverage of the JFK assassination and they start rolling out the spiel again about Oswald having done it.
But for all these decades, we've had this photograph of Oswald standing in the doorway during the shooting.
And yet they act like it doesn't exist.
And this is like the old parable about the emperor wearing no clothes.
Yes.
And give out the websites again.
Everyone's afraid to tell them.
Give out the websites.
The Oswald Innocence Campaign website is the word oswald-innocent.com.
And the OIC blog is oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.
OswaldInTheDoorway.blogspot.com.
And, Ralph, the campaign that you and others have organized has gotten a large group of very credible researchers who have signed on and agree that the analysis is that the original photograph was showing Oswald in the doorway.
Every one of our members vouches for it, and we have some very prominent members.
Jim Mars is a member.
We have seven professors, seven tenured professors, Gerald McPhee, David Roan.
We have attorney Mark Lane.
I spoke to Mark Lane on the phone.
He and I had a conversation that probably lasted for half an hour.
He gave me his consent to add his name to our roster, and we talked about many things.
We have prominent...
JFK authors like Phil Nelson.
We have the great Jack White, who is probably the greatest photo-analysis in JFK research history.
Just in conclusion, Ralph, we really want to thank you for coming in today.
Thank you for having me, Jerry.
And getting this opportunity to explain to the American public a key component of the deception that Lee Harvey Oswald was the assassin of John F. Kennedy.
He was innocent!
Thank you, Ralph.
Thank you, Jerry.
Thank you.
And that's that they are the resistance.
The resistance to what?
Free peoples taking our government back?
Trying to secure our borders?
Pulling out of international agreements like the TPP that take our sovereignty away?
Getting industry to move back to the United States?
Boosting the stock market?
Taking care of our veterans?
Defending our second amendment?
Devolving power back to the states?
Is that what you're the resistance to?
All the corporate media and the America hating Hollywood and the George Soros funded social distortion groups?
All of you are ruthless scum attempting to dominate what's left of America because you are threatened by success.
You are threatened by the golden goose that lays the golden eggs.
You would kill that goose just because you think you're in competition with it.
And therein lies your selfishness, your true mental illness that is a threat not just to the general public, but to yourselves.
You don't like other people being successful.
You want to sit on top of a pile of stinking rubbish and skulls and declare yourself Yertle the Turtle.
While the rest of us that are creators and strivers and builders want to create a better world for ourselves, our children, and their children into the future, it's time to say no to your suicide cult.
It's time to say no to your culture of death.
And it's time for many of you that haven't turned yourselves completely over to evil to realize the path you've been going down has not fulfilled you.
If you want to be fulfilled, if you want to be empowered, Begin to believe in humanity.
Reject the political correctness that's nothing but social engineering and division.
And join the true renaissance of the 21st century.
Please subscribe to our YouTube channels.
Follow us on Twitter and of course on Facebook.
And always spread the articles and videos from InfoWars.com because we are the tip of the spear.
That's why the enemy is attacking us.
That's why they hate us.
That's why they want to shut us down.
Because they know the information we are providing.
The intel we are giving the world.
is the equivalent of the Death Star plans.
It will bring them down if you simply use it In the last week of July we are offering the biggest sales of the year and We're extending free shipping until the end of the month and expanding discounts of up to 60-plus percent off on incredibly high-quality supplements and nutraceuticals at InfoWarsLive.com.
Our top-of-the-line colloidal silver, Silver Bullet, is only $9.95.
That's 66% off retail price and way lower what you're going to find from comparable brands in major stores.
Then we've got our Super Silver Oral Care package at 50% off.
We've never offered a deal this good.
This trio includes Silver Bullet Colloidal Silver, Super Blue High Quality Fluoride Free Toothpaste, and an Electrical High Quality Toothbrush that's impregnated with colloidal silver, all for 50% off the regular price.
When it comes to gravity-fed filters that cut out all the garbage, ProPure is the best, and we've got a whopping 30% off on the ProPure Traveler for only this week as well.
Alexa Pure Breeze is 25% off the already low price.
We haven't offered this deal in over a year.
The Alexa Pure Breeze has been a game-changer since it came out two years ago.
Comparable units cost as much as $800.
This unit isn't even a third of that price, and it's discounted right now at InfoWarsStore.com.
Vitamin Mineral Fusion with Amino Acids is 33% off the regular price ever.
And again, there's free shipping on top of all of this, but only for the last week of July.
Knockout, our proprietary sleep aid that fuses nine known compounds from Mother Nature is a whopping 50% off right now.
But again, only for one more week.
It's got L-tryptophan, it's got melatonin, it's got valerian root and more.
Normally, one bottle of melatonin, just as strong as the melatonin in this bottle, is the same price or more.
Prostaguard is 33% off as well.
Leading competitors that don't even have as much Sawpaw Meadow are up to $50 a bottle.
It's $19.95 right now, and it's not just Sawpaw Meadow.
It's fused with other compounds that are known to be associated with overall better prostate health.
The Paul Watson coffee and tea mugs are 33% off as well.
Conservatism is the new counterculture.
And now introducing new to the Infowars store.
Our new Strawberry Caveman Bone Broth Formula with turmeric, bee pollen, chaga mushroom, and so much more.
If you thought the chocolate tasted great, wait till you try the strawberry.
And, of course, there's also 25% off out of the gates on the new formulation of Caveman.
You can also get 25% off when you get the strawberry-flavored Caveman with the chocolate Caveman.
And don't forget, there's an additional 10% off on top of all of that when you sign up for anything on AutoShip at InfoWarnerStore.com.
So it's a true 360 win.
The globalists have been striking back against.
Independent media that's attempting to build an open free society.
But despite all their attacks, all their demonizations, and their attempts to take our sponsors and shut us down, you, the viewers and listeners of InfoWars, have come through.
And so we're able to maintain our position and begin to expand it in the face of the globalist.
Ladies and gentlemen, when I tell you that you are the InfoWars...
That's not me being patronizing.
You are the reason we're here.
When you spread articles, when you spread videos, when you pray for us, when you financially support us, and in turn get high-quality products that make your life better, it is a true symbiotic relationship.
Or as I say, a total 360 win.
So in the month of July, we've had some big specials.
And a lot of the products that we were having as specials have sold out.
That's why in the last week of July, I'm going to offer specials on some new products and on some of our best-selling staples to you, the viewers.
▲
Export Selection