| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| David Knight for Infowars.com. | |
| Let's talk about how Bilderberg became known by some people. | |
| We've had a couple of years where we had thousands of people show up. | |
| Now we have just a few people showing up this year. | |
| So what we're going to talk about, is the empire striking back? | |
| Are they winning? | |
| But how did people find out about Bilderberg in the first place? | |
| As I said, many of the people who drive by here ask those of us who are gathered out here, what's going on? | |
| They don't know what's happening. | |
| They don't know what Bilderberg is when you mention that to them. | |
| As I pointed out, when I first heard of it 30-some-odd years ago, I had the same reaction. | |
| I was very skeptical that anything real was behind all of this. | |
| One individual, Jim Tucker, started reporting on this about 21 years after this. | |
| They began meeting in 1975. He was a sports reporter. | |
| He thought it was very unusual when he saw this meeting going on with the captains of industry, the biggest banks, the best-connected politicians meeting secretly, and there was absolutely no press coverage. | |
| He thought, this is very suspicious. | |
| So he began investigating into it. | |
| He got a lot of sources. | |
| And basically, he was a lone voice in the wilderness for a very long time. | |
| As a matter of fact, you know, that was 1975. Alex Jones was only one year old. | |
| So he kept reporting that, and it gradually began building. | |
| But that was a time when we did not have the internet, so it was very difficult for people to find information. | |
| You don't have that problem now. | |
| If you're interested, you can find that information yourself. | |
| Like I said, I want to light the fire so you fill your bucket, fill your friends' buckets with what's going on. | |
| Let me just give you one example. | |
| In 2006, in the Ottawa meeting of Bilderberg... | |
| Alex Jones, of course, was covering it quite extensively at that time. | |
| At that meeting, Jim Tucker said that he was told by people inside that they were going to do a massive meltdown of mortgages, that a massive number of people in the US would lose their homes. | |
| And he talked about how one guy was saying, serves them right. | |
| You know, they're just bottom-feeding scum. | |
| Another guy said, this is horrible, whatever. | |
| Those are some of the reactions. | |
| That's why some of the people were leaking this. | |
| Understand that everybody that goes to Bilderberg is not necessarily a bad guy. | |
| Some of these people go in once, twice, they see what's going on, and it's like, I don't want to have anything to do with this. | |
| This is reportedly what Margaret Thatcher said. | |
| At the time, he reported that, and that was... | |
| Before the mortgage meltdown, a couple of years before that happened. | |
| In 2007, as a matter of fact, Alex Jones did a documentary, Endgame, Blueprint for Global Enslavement. | |
| Jim Tucker featured prominently in that. | |
| They talked about the coming meltdown in the financial market. | |
| This has real consequences for you. | |
| As you've always heard, you may not be interested in politics, but politics is interested in you. | |
| It gradually began to build the publicity of the documentaries that Alex Jones did. | |
| Of course, we've had other people investigating this. | |
| Daniel Estelin, we just had him on several times prior to Bilderberg talking about his books. | |
| He's just done a documentary himself, thebilderbergmovie.com, I believe, is where you can find that. | |
| You see the trailer of what he's done. | |
| I haven't seen that documentary yet. | |
| But there are many documentaries out there from Alex Jones, from others. | |
| There are books out there that have been written by Daniel Estelin and others. | |
| Jim Tucker wrote a book. | |
| So there's no reason that you can't understand. | |
| What this structure is. | |
| You can go as deep into it as you want to, but you need to understand that the bottom line is the destruction of national sovereignty, the erasing of borders, the crony capitalism that comes along with this. | |
| The climate change agreement that we just exited had nothing to do with saving the earth or the environment. | |
| China and other major polluters, according to them, were going to get a free pass for decades before they even had to cap, let alone reduce, their usage. | |
| We, on the other hand... | |
| In the West, in America, in Western Europe, we were going to have drastic cuts by that time. | |
| It was about picking winners and losers. | |
| It was about putting America last, not first. | |
| And that was a key thing for Donald Trump to understand. | |
| There were many advisors that were pushing to get him out of the climate change agreement, just as there were many pushing to keep him in. | |
| Some were pointing out that, hey, you don't have to do anything about it. | |
| It's not legally binding. | |
| We only had Barack Obama sign this as an executive order. | |
| It was not ratified by the Senate, so it's not going to be a problem. | |
| However, there were lawyers in the Trump administration. | |
| I can't recall the guy's name, but there were many, like Scott Pruitt at the EPA, other lawyers, who pointed out to him there will be lawsuits on the basis of not only the Paris Climate Accord, but also on the Endangerment Clause. | |
| That also must be taken out, because if we don't take that out, we will have many lawsuits in the courts tying it up as the orders to protect our borders are being tied up in the courts now. | |
| But that is the essence of the structure. | |
| The structure was born at Bilderberg. | |
| The structure was continued in secret, and it has played out over the decades. | |
| So the question is, as we see the rise and fall of public turnout, is there a rise and fall in public awareness? | |
| Are people getting complacent? | |
| Are the small crowds we see here at Bilderberg this year, is that evidence of complacency about this because we have Donald Trump there? | |
| We cannot be complacent. | |
| We cannot say, Donald Trump's got this covered. | |
| I don't have to worry about it. | |
| You need to back the agenda that you voted for. | |
| Donald Trump ran on an agenda. | |
| You need to back that as vociferously as you can because these people here... | |
| Very powerful, are working quietly to undermine that agenda, to undermine the Trump administration. | |
| And if you don't push back against it, there are even people in the Trump administration. | |
| Perhaps some of the people that are here are not representing Trump, but maybe have their loyalties elsewhere as neocons who want a perpetual war, who believe that we can have counterinsurgencies, that we have an American empire that needs to be the policeman of the world, and that we can destroy nations and rebuild them in our image. | |
| That's been proven to be a failure, but that is a tactic, a technique of these same people. | |
| So is the empire striking back? | |
| Will you let it strike back? | |
| Will you pay attention? | |
| Will you wake others up? | |
| Will you fill your bucket? | |
| I hope I've lit the fire with just touching on some of the issues, the history of Bilderberg. | |
| That was my intention. | |
| Hope that worked. |
Export Selection