I just want to make a quick comment about these terror attacks.
It seems like we're having one every single day.
Today we have a French-Tunisian.
And as I talked about this, I said, you know, this is kind of the terror attack du jour, isn't it?
Every day we're seeing one of these things.
And yesterday, I said, and I didn't know who had done it, but we saw the method that they're using, the using of the vehicles, running down pedestrians, jumping out with a knife, stabbing people.
I said, this is an Islamic attack.
We all knew that it was based on the method of operation.
So I said, we already know the guy's name.
It's Mohammed.
We're just waiting for the last name.
Now, we put out some reports that were unofficial naming of an individual who turns out still in prison.
It wasn't that guy.
And his name actually yesterday wasn't Mohammed.
Today, however, it was.
And it illustrates the fact, and I had somebody come back on Twitter and say, look, you idiot, the guy yesterday was British.
He was born in Britain.
That doesn't change anything.
Do you realize that what that illustrates is the fact that the real threat here is Islam and the radical Islamic terrorism.
Immigration and bringing people in.
It's simply the method of bringing in the terror.
That's what they're doing with this.
And you have to understand, just as we see with this guy in Britain yesterday, that it's going to be the second generation that is going to be more dangerous to us.
We have to understand that when these people come in, they're being brought in by the globalists because they do not want to assimilate.
They do not like our culture.
They don't like us.
They want to remain separate and apart from us.
They look down upon the people that...
They have chosen to immigrate into.
They self-ghettoize into their religious community.
And so what's going to happen is the second generation is going to grow up.
They're not going to realize what they have come into.
They're not going to remember the place that they left, the violence, the poverty that they left.
They're going to look at this ghetto that they live in because their parents do not want them to assimilate into the culture that they reject.
And they're going to look at that ghetto and they're going to blame the people there.
And that's what happened with this British guy.
Now, the guy in Antwerp, Belgium, he is a French Tunisian.
He is an immigrant.
But they like to emphasize that he's French.
Look, he's Islamic.
And that's what we're saying here, that it doesn't matter.
Unfortunately, today they stopped the guy.
He was loaded for bear.
He's wearing camo.
He's got his car stocked up with liquid gas, with knives, with guns.
Fortunately, this guy was all hat and no cattle, as we say in Texas, because he couldn't run down anybody.
He didn't shoot anybody.
He got caught, and they stopped the guy.
But we have to understand that this is something that is going to continue to happen unless we face the root causes of this.
And the very fact that these people, perhaps this French Tunisian who is a French citizen, Maybe he is an immigrant who became a French citizen.
But the guy in Britain illustrates the fact that the true problem is Islam.
So I want you to think about that.
I wanted to explain this more to me.
That is the real issue that is the bottom here, that we're not confronting.
And that is that Islam is the problem.
Immigration is the means by which it comes in.
And it isn't simply Muslim immigration.
Be concerned about MS-13.
Like I talked about, you're talking about Trump lied about repealing ACA. Hang on, I'm going to talk about the Affordable Care Act, quote-unquote, Obamacare.
It's not affordable.
We need to talk about that as well.
I'm going to go to that in just a moment.
But I want to finish up on this immigration issue.
Because when we look at what's going on with MS-13, MS-13 was created by immigrants who came here as a criminal organization, a transnational criminal organization.
So we have to understand that this can come in, it doesn't have to be based upon a religion.
It is a very convenient way for these terrorists to organize around a religion.
But they can also organize around crime.
And we cannot give these people, as we see in sanctuary cities, the rape that happened in Rockville, Maryland, as I talked about yesterday on the radio, the rape that happened in Rockville, Maryland...
It was done by people that, a couple of individuals, they say they were 18 and 19 years old.
Hey, Connecticut, how you doing?
They say they're 18 and 19 years old.
But we don't know what their age is.
We don't know where they came from.
We don't know if they're part of MS-13.
There were ICE orders to deport these guys.
And the law enforcement, quote-unquote law enforcement, you know what, I just tweeted out, if you are selective about your law enforcement, that is lawlessness.
And we don't...
We don't want lawlessness in our law enforcement officers.
If you're going to have people who refuse to deport gang members, and that's what people in California said, immigration advocates in California said, we want these lists of gang members hidden from the Trump administration because we don't want them deporting people.
They might deport somebody that's accused of being a gang member, so we would rather leave the real gang members here rather than take them out.
It's good to see you, too.
Thanks.
We don't want to take them out.
We want to leave them here.
They're willing to sacrifice us for political correctness.
And that's the same thing that's happening in Maryland.
You're right.
There is something wrong with Maryland.
Something greatly wrong with Maryland.
In that particular county, as I reported yesterday, it's not just the Rockville rapes, but it's also the murders.
And the murders were of Hispanic people.
That were a competition to the gang or trying to get into the gang or had betrayed the gang.
We need to wake up and understand what's going on.
And we need to get serious about this.
But Maryland is moving in the other direction.
They want to make their entire state a sanctuary state.
They want to violate the law, not enforce the law.
And that is a major issue.
And that's what we're talking about here in the threat that is coming from Islam, the threat that's coming from drug cartels.
And I just put up...
a video a couple of days ago with a news report about the next step in this lawsuit for 9-11 to get I think the most important thing about this is that we start to get information,
that discovery that accompanies this lawsuit will start to unravel this false official story, this false conspiracy theory about 9-11.
But when I put that up, We had Google throttle us and say, we're not going to allow this to be monetized.
We're not going to serve any ads on your video because we think it's too controversial.
So they don't want me talking about 9-11.
They don't want to be talking about the government's connection to the Saudi government.
See, that's one of the key things when we talk about Islam.
It's not just, it's ISIS being run by the CIA, the CIA and Saudi Arabia being joined at the hip.
As I said, you can't tell where one stops and the other one ends.
So we have to understand where this is all going and the gangs that are in Central America, one of the key things about Google's move that was reported by Wall Street Journal to shut down monetization of videos and to shut down people being able to accept ads on their site and get money from it, they said we are going to shut down controversial videos.
And that's what they said about my video.
They said it was controversial.
Who was it that complained in the Wall Street Journal article, the people that were the top of the list complaining was HSBC, and that brings us full circle.
We're talking about international gangs, Muslims, the Saudis, MS-13, and it's HSBC who's been funding terrorists, who has been money laundering terrorist money, and also...
They had their own window set up for the Sinaloa Drug Cartel, which is El Chapo's drug cartel.
We heard a lot of stuff about when he escaped, but we didn't hear that much about the money laundering.
HSBC has been convicted multiple times.
After they were convicted the first time, they were put on probation.
They allowed them to continue doing this.
And I've interviewed a guy who worked for them, blew the whistle on them, said they were not interested in catching these people.
As a matter of fact, they sabotaged the search database so these people could not be found.
They wanted to continue to launder this money.
And Rolling Stone magazine reported about it.
Matt Tiabi reported about this.
Nobody's talking about that.
They focus on El Chapo getting out of jail.
But the reality is that we've got HSBC who laundered the money for them, who gave them their own checkout window, coming to Google and saying, we don't want you monetizing controversial content.
And that would include me talking about 9-11.
That would include me talking about the victims of 9-11 suing the Saudi-CIA connection for compensation.
That's what they don't want to be monetized.
They want to throttle that and they're coming at it from every direction.
They will not allow our ads to be served on other sites and they don't want us to be able to accept ads.
They don't want us to be able to get monetized on YouTube.
They're trying to strangle us financially.
It's being driven by the corrupt banks who are funding the terrorists, who are funding the drug cartels.
Think about that.
Now, just briefly, this whole issue, somebody brought this up earlier about the Affordable Health Care Act.
I'm very concerned to see the push that is being done by Donald Trump on this.
This is a Paul Ryan bill.
You have to understand that they thought there was a small chance that Obama might lose four years ago in 2012 when they ran.
So they pulled somebody up, Mitt Romney, who had already enacted Obamacare in Massachusetts with the help of Ted Kennedy.
They wanted to hedge their bets.
They said, well, we think that Obama's going to win, but in case he doesn't, we want to make sure that the globalists and the insurance companies take over our health care, that we run this for their benefit.
So they put in Mitt Romney, and he selected Paul Ryan.
Paul Ryan has been open borders.
Paul Ryan has been for the insurance companies running our health care, and that is what he continues to do.
We must not fall for this head fake and say we have to do something.
Exactly.
Obamacare is Romneycare.
It's also Paul Ryan-o care.
Ryan is a Ryan-o.
He's a Republican in name only.
We need to...
We need to be able to step back to this thing and say, this is not what we voted for Donald Trump for.
This is not what he ran for.
If you look at his health care plan, and they've now removed it, interestingly enough, and I guess maybe they've taken down all of his policy positions for when he ran.
He has seven or eight points.
They were all market-based.
They were all about giving us empowerment, information, competition, things that are going to reduce the cost of health care.
And so we have to do something to really have genuine reform.
And that genuine reform needs to stop Obamacare to begin with.
We need to repeal Obamacare.
That's the key thing.
And I see most of you agree that Paul Ryan needs to go, that Ryancare is...
I see that Ryancare requires DNA testing or high penalties.
See, that's what we don't want.
What Donald Trump ran on...
Was giving us power to make decisions, allowing competition across state lines.
Why is it good to have open borders and open trade that the globalists tell us?
We want to have unfettered competition across our national borders, but we can't have health care competition across our state borders.
Do you understand what they're about?
That is the key that you have to understand.
They don't want competition.
This is being done for the benefit of the healthcare companies.
They're trying to merge because they're not making money.
They want to merge and then have a bailout like we did with the banks.
It was Bill Clinton who allowed the bank mergers to go through, created too big to fail banks, and then took away Glass-Steagall, let them get into speculative stuff, and then bailed them out.
That's the logical consequence of what's happening.
That's what they're trying to do in the insurance industry.
And I agree with you.
I think Rand Paul is the way to go.
We really need to make sure that we're going to first have repeal.
Let's stop.
Let's replace them with marketplaces.
Let's stop the taxes and replace them with tax credits.
Let's have choice instead of coercion.
And, okay, Michael Savage says, high-risk insurance pools are the way to go.
I agree.
I think there's a lot of different things that we could do.
Let us choose.
Give us tax credits.
Give us information on...
The different health care providers allow us to shop across state lines.
That's the important thing.
So we need to make sure that we're going to have genuine reform.
It's not good enough to just go out here and say, we're going to support Paul Ryan's bill because Paul Ryan's bill can pass, and we're going to pretend that it fixes things, and then I'm going to say I've done something and moved on.
That's not good enough.
You need to do what you campaigned on.
You need to do what your healthcare plan campaigned on.
I really, really believe that, and the conservatives believe that, and I hope the Freedom Caucus hangs tough, because we're going to stand behind them if they're going to fight this takeover of our economy, this takeover of our healthcare.
I want to say one more thing, and yeah, none of us want rhino care.
Root this thing out before it gets more deeply embedded into our society.
Remember that the Department of Education was newly created under Jimmy Carter.
It was less than four years old.
And Ronald Reagan said that he was going to get rid of Obamacare.
He's going to get rid of the Department of Education.
He didn't do that.
He made it larger.
If we do that, then we are with...
Obamacare, and that's what this will do if we pass Ryancare.
If we allow this to continue, then we are going to...
If we do this with Ryancare, then this thing is going to get so rooted in the fabric of our society that we will never get rid of it.
Do you hear anybody talking about getting rid of the Department of Education?
No, they don't.
They don't.
It's now something that we...
We've had all of our lives and they think that we can't educate children without a Department of Education.
We can educate kids without a Department of Education.
We don't need and should not have under the Constitution any involvement of the federal government education.
And that goes double for health care.
So we need to make sure that this does not Get established that we don't do some minor changes to it and then essentially leave it in place.
We need to pull it out by the roots before it gets rooted so deeply that we cannot get it pulled out of the roots.
Thanks for your comments.
Thanks for watching.
I'm gonna shut this thing down now.
Follow me on Twitter at Libertitarian.
I think most of you have seen this there.
Thanks so much for listening.
Bye.
Bye.
That communist Chinese-style net censorship was coming to the web.
Because it's already here.
It's being announced.
The way you keep the internet open and free is you get involved more than ever.
Go to Infowars.com forward slash app.
A new battleship in the fight.
Infowars Live.
Available right now.
We're looking for a crew to man it.
You're going to sit down and play games and be a trendy?
Or are you going to be part of history?
Don't sit by and let the internet and free speech be stolen from you.