Any journalist or anybody else who can come up with a single, who can point to a single existing study that says that it's safe to inject mercury into little babies or pregnant women at the levels that we are currently injecting them in the flu vaccine.
So you just completed your press conference offering the $100,000 challenge.
If you could do maybe a quick recap of that and why you decided to throw down that much money and, I guess, talk about the, I guess, your challenge to the media, because this is a big challenge to the media, essentially.
Yeah, I mean, you know, we're in the midst of a childhood pediatric epidemic of neurodevelopmental disorders.
Autoimmune disease and of anaphylaxis, food allergies, asthma.
According to CDC, one out of every six American children now has neurodevelopmental disease.
Forty-three percent of American children have some kind of chronic disease.
Oh, and that's not normal.
Children aren't supposed to be sick like that.
This is the sickest generation in the history of our country.
And the illnesses began in 1989. This is according to EPA scientists.
They say that's the gateway year when all of these illnesses began.
Well, that's the year.
The vaccine schedule was dramatically enlarged.
You know, I got three vaccines as a kid.
My kids got 69 shots of 16 vaccines.
The amount of mercury that generation was exposed to was off the chart, far higher than anything, you know, hundreds of times what EPA considers safe.
Oh, and these kids are being injured.
And the epidemic in some ways is really a symptom of journalistic malpractice.
You know, that journalists are not asking the questions or investigating the science.
Instead, they're parroting.
The safety assurances of CDC. And the CDC has been proven time and time again to have corrupting conflicts of interest.
And, you know, its chief scientist just came forward.
I hired a whistleblower attorney and said, for a decade, we've been lying about the science.
We've been hiding it.
We've been destroying it.
Being ordered to destroy it in garbage cans whenever it shows that there's a link with autism or other adverse effects.
I guess, next question is, you're concentrating on mercury.
Aluminum is another neurotoxin that's in a lot of these vaccines.
Do you see that as, after you're going to work at getting mercury out of vaccines, are you going to look at aluminum?
Because that also is, they say it has the same effects that mercury and lead can have on the brain.
Yeah, I mean, the impacts of mercury, mercury is not as neurotoxic as, I mean, aluminum is not as neurotoxic as mercury.
Under most circumstances, but it's still a devastating neurotoxin, and it's been connected not only with dementia and Alzheimer's and a lot of neurodevelopmental disorders, but it's also very, very well connected in the literature to allergies to the onset.
We've had this explosion now of food allergies, and it appears to be that aluminum is the major culprit.
Well, I mean, you know, the fact is that metals, heavy metals of any kind, do not mix with, you know, children's brains.
And we should be figuring out how to make the vaccines as safe as possible.
Mercury is a no-brainer.
It should be taken out right away.
It is unnecessary.
Aluminum is a little harder to take out because it's used as an adjuvant.
And adjuvants...
You know, really have to be balanced against vaccine effectiveness.
I mean, the ultimate answer is we need really good science, and we're not getting it.
And we need independent science by people who are really looking for truth and not looking to, you know, achieve a prescribed result and just assure the public that there's no problem.
We need real science, and we need science, you know, that looks at the whole program.
Do you think it's also an issue with the revolving door of people working in government and going to work for these big pharmaceutical companies and vice versa?
You know, there's a phenomenon called an agency capture phenomenon.
And agency capture is when the agency is captured by the industry that it's supposed to regulate.
It becomes a sock puppet for the industry.
And I've seen, you know, agency capture during 33 years.
You know, I suppose, you know, the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection is one of the worst examples, but I don't think there's anybody as bad as CDC's vaccine division.
And the truth is, it's not just the revolving door and kind of the budget, you know, how it's controlled by Congress, by people who run pharma's payroll in Congress, but it also, CDC has unique issues because So many people in that vaccine division are making money off the vaccines that they are regulating and promoting.
And CDC itself is a vaccine company.
CDC owns 56 vaccine patents.
It sells $4.1 billion of vaccines a year.
So the agency capture there is much more pervasive.
Anyplace else, because there's so many mechanisms by which it's happening.
And really, you know, what Congress said about CDC is that the entire vaccine division has been subsumed into the matrix of promoting vaccines.
So if you're a scientist and your job is to prove efficacy, to test the vaccine for efficacy or safety.
Your conclusions are ultimately biased and in some cases changed in order to satisfy that matrix that we need to promote vaccines.
And if you say anything bad about them or express any doubts, people stop using them.
So you just have to keep telling people they're completely safe.
And you've had that personally happen to you when you've tried to appear with the media.
Robert De Niro was with me today.
There's no way they would have left me on TV to talk about these issues.
I believe that, you know, in many of the interviews we gave, we'll never see the light of day because nobody, you know, the American press really has, it's been, you know, the role that they've played in this is an extreme kind of malpractice.
They've adopted this orthodoxy.
I suppose they're telling themselves that, well, we can't say anything bad about vaccines because people stop vaccinating.
But, you know, that's not the role of journalists in a democracy.
You know, you can't be making decisions, making yourself God.
You need to tell the truth, you know.
And, I mean, there's times in our history when, for national security reasons, you know, journalists have agreed to sort of...
Not criticize government for a week or two weeks or, you know, not to tell a study report.
But nothing like this ever happened where you go decades covering up a lie.
You know, that's just wrong.
And by the way, it's not strengthening the vaccine program.
Exactly.
It's hurting it.
And it's enabling...
The lack of scrutiny is enabling the most reckless and irresponsible behavior by the pharmaceutical industry, who knows nobody's going to look at them, and by regulators at CDC. So my last question is about solutions.
What would the first hundred days, if Trump was to task you to lead a vaccine commission on safety, what would your first hundred days look like?
Well, you know, I would assume that it would be a very short period and that, you know, the recommendations would be fairly modest, which would be to make, for example, to open the Vaccine Safety Data Link, which is the biggest repository for vaccine information for, you know, it's the medical records of nine million kids and their vaccine records.
And you could look in there and answer all these questions, but CDC won't let anybody in it.
The National Toxicity Program, which is part of FDA, tried to do toxicity testing on thimerosal in 2006. It was nominated as a priority chemical, and it was scheduled for testing, and CDC came in and blocked it.
They said, we don't want you to test it for toxicity.
So it's never been tested for safety.
It was grandfathered into the vaccine program, and nobody's ever tested it.
The National Texas A-Programm ought to be able to test it, and that, I think, would be a reasonable recommendation for a commission.
I think in 2013, the Institute of Medicine tried to review the 19 studies that CDC has offered to exonerate Dimerosal, and CDC blocked them from doing it.
Unheard of.
So, you know, I think if those things happen...
That the public would begin to see that, you know, we're being lied to.
And this agency needs a revamp.
I talk to a lot of doctors and nurses, and they don't vaccinate their children.
And so it's funny to see them pushing it so hard.
But I read articles about these.
I've had nurses come up to me at events and say, you know, I don't vaccinate my kids.
And I mean, so how can...
I guess, how has it gone this far where the doctors sort of unhurt?
Most doctors and most nurses do vaccinate their kids, and most of them believe in the vaccine program.
And they believe that there's no problem.
But, you know, the truth is we're paying out hundreds of millions of dollars a year to people who are injured by vaccines, and we can do this better.
You know, say for vaccines, we should have no kids injured.
And it's just there's no excuse.
We shouldn't have to.
You shouldn't be able to go to Americans and say, we're going to sacrifice your kids so that these kids can live.
And we've gotten to a point now where it's ridiculous.
There hasn't been a death in this country from measles in 10 years, in a decade at least.
But during that period, there's been 69 deaths from the measles vaccine.
So what are we doing?
And those are the ones that are provable.
Yeah, those are the people who have recovered.
You know, the government has admitted, yes, the vaccine killed that kid.
And they anticipate with the vaccine, the virus system, that only 10% of actual...
Very few of the people who actually died, according to the government's own data, maybe 10% actually got reported.
All right.
Well, thank you very much.
Thank you.
My fellow Info Warriors, My fellow InfoWarriors, I am very excited to be able to announce to you the introduction at InfoWarsLife.com of a new way to save time and money when you stock up on InfoWarsLife formulations like Survival Shield X2 and Super Metal Vitality.
Just go to InfoWarsLife.com today, select your favorite product, click on AutoShip before adding to cart, and choose how often you want us to send you another word.
Every time you choose AutoShip at InfoWarsLife.com, you get 10% off and you won't have to worry about running out and having to reorder next time.
And of course, you can cancel with one click anytime.
As you know, I'm all about the idea of a 360 win.
And the new auto ship feature at InfoWarsLife.com is a sure win for everybody.
A win for liberty, a win for health, and a win when it comes to big savings.
Visit InfoWarsLife.com today and save 10% on your next InfoWarsLife order by selecting AutoShip at checkout.