All Episodes
Oct. 10, 2012 - InfoWars Special Reports
04:51
20121010_SpecialReport-2_Alex
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Time Text
Thanks for watching!
Yes!
Everybody in Cleveland, low minority, got Obama phone!
Keep Obama in president, you know!
He gave us a phone!
He's gonna do more!
As the Obama phone video continues to go viral, the video has prompted many Americans to criticize the welfare state and the pitiful results most welfare programs have produced.
One such program is the Lifeline Benefit Program, which has received rave reviews from the Obama phone lady and other low-income residents.
I have about like six in my personnel.
Each and every one of these phones work.
At home I know I have about thirty and all I'm on.
Do you think it's a good idea for the federal government to charge three dollars on your cell bill to give people free cell phones?
I don't think so.
I think a cell phone's not unnecessary, so I don't think the government has this right to do that.
Not at all.
That's completely garbage.
I mean, I pay a hundred plus a month for my cell phone.
I don't see why they're handing out free cell phones to other people.
No.
Why not?
Well, I think it's a product.
If people want to buy it and can afford to buy it, they should.
But I don't think the government should be handing them out.
Handing somebody a cell phone is an opportunity to get a job.
It's an opportunity to call back your employer.
There is no more public phones.
So you can't just ask them to shove them in the public phones.
They've been reduced by 90% in this country.
So I think there should be a program.
But every American who has a cell phone to pay $3 without being asked, that's not American in my book.
So it should be optional?
It should be optional.
Um, I don't think so.
I think that's a controversial question, but I think basic human rights like food, shelter, healthcare should be given by the government, but not commodities like cell phones, no.
Yeah, you see, I do have an issue with people reducing really complicated issues down to quick sound bites.
Generally, people that are receiving government benefits aren't living the high life and living in comfort.
So, I don't really have a problem with following the edict of helping the people that need the most help.
I do.
I think it's important to give a little to get a lot, and obviously we've all gotten a lot.
I went to public school, I drive on the roads, I ride my bike in bike lanes, so I do believe in giving money so that other people can have something that I already have.
Generally speaking, I don't have a problem with providing poor people with cell phones, especially when those poor people are women with children.
And without cell phones, they find themselves in danger.
We don't have pay phones anymore, so people can't just walk around the corner and use a phone.
So a low-cost, bare-bones cell phone for safety only makes sense.
The FCC, which oversees this initiative, says phone ownership among this group has increased by an estimated 12% since the program began in the 1980s.
According to the Cato Institute, since President Barack Obama took office, federal welfare assistance has increased by an estimated 41%.
The organization also notes that over the past half century, both the federal government and local governments have spent an estimated $15 trillion trying to combat poverty.
However, during this time, the poverty rate has only decreased by about 4%.
Is that stealing?
I think it is because it's not the citizen's rights.
I mean, it's not the obligation of the citizens to pay for other people's cell phones.
It's stealing in a sense.
In short, yes it is.
What if it went to poor people?
I'm not the richest guy either.
I'm not poor, but I don't have a lot of money and I spend some of my money on my cell phone, so why can't other people?
I don't think so.
Why not?
I think we all get a lot from the government.
So I got roads, I got public school, etc.
So I think public services are for the good of everybody.
Well, I don't know if it's stealing.
I think it's probably excessive spending on the federal government's part.
I think, as far as three dollars go, you know, I don't think it's stealing from the American public.
But I do think, I don't know, I guess you would have to, The public should be informed, is what I'm saying.
So you should have access to the information of where it's going.
If you don't, then I don't know if I would want to label it stealing, but I would label it wrong.
Export Selection