All Episodes
June 22, 2025 - Sunday Night Live - Chase Geiser
01:44:51
Sunday Night Live! Russia, North Korea Say They’ll Supply Iran With Nukes, Strait Of Hormuz Blockade Approved & DHS Warns Of Terror Attacks As Michigan Church Shot Up By Gunman - FULL SHOW - 06/22/2025
Participants
Main voices
c
chase geiser
01:04:18
Appearances
a
alex jones
04:42
j
jd vance
01:39
t
tom cotton
01:07
t
tucker carlson
02:00
Clips
k
kasie hunt
00:09
p
pete hegseth
00:56
s
shawn ryan
00:54
Callers
dave in arizona
01:59
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
chase geiser
World War III has probably been going on for some time.
History will probably delineate last night as its official start because after all, the United States of America did use B-2 bombers to strike Iran after years of promises that Obviously, during Trump's first term, he famously said no new wars, and he honored that promise.
I fundamentally believe that Trump didn't want to get into this conflict, and frankly, I don't even think that it's about nuclear weapons.
I think it's much more sophisticated, complicated, and nuanced than that.
And I'll be getting into all that throughout this show this evening at 7 p.m.
George Papadopoulos, a famous...
And I'm going to be asking him about how that may actually be incentivizing the U.S. to get involved in Iran and how nuclear weapons might just be a front.
But before we get into the news, the breaking headlines, the clips that I've lined up and prepared for you, I do want to honor those who called in during the Alex Jones show.
I see Dave, Gilbert, and Ian on the board.
Let's go first to Dave in FEMA Region 9. You want to talk about Cloward and Piven?
Well, so do I. What's on your mind?
dave in arizona
Thank you so much, Chase.
VIP member, we just ordered the new coins for my crew today, so appreciate those.
As you've mentioned at the beginning of your show, and as I've mentioned the last year, we are currently in what I call World War GXI, the CCP China Fentanyl Poison.
chase geiser
But I'm going to go off of what he just said because he is absolutely right.
And if he calls back in, go ahead and put him right through.
We are in a proxy war with China through Iran, just like we're in a proxy war with Russia through Ukraine.
And the Ukrainian thing is complicated.
Some people think, and maybe this is true, that it's the military industrial complex's effort to have control over Russia, given that whoever is going to be in power after Putin is a wild card, a loose cannon.
We're not sure who's going to be in control.
And so the military-industrial complex, the national security apparatus of the United States of America, wants to have as much control of the Russian economy, the border as possible, to ensure that this major nuclear power is not a threat into the future.
Plus, there's also other implications about control over food supplies for Europe in the event that we do have another access and allies conflict similar to what we had between 1941 and 1945 during World War II, of course.
So Ukraine is an incredibly pivotal region.
Of the world in terms of national security.
That's one reason.
Now, with Iran, what we have is something more complicated.
This conflict is actually between China and the United States, and it's just playing out in Iran because the Russias of the world, the Irans of the world, and the Chinas of the world want to ensure that the dollar is not the global reserve currency into the 21st century in the same way that it was in the 20th century.
They're trying to establish their own digital yuan or their own digital central bank digital currency.
So that they can weaponize that technology and that leverage in the same way that the United States did during the 20th century.
And they would weaponize it under the leadership and auspice and philosophy and culture of the CCP.
Whereas we, the United States, did it as some neo-Roman empire, some righteous indignation.
But let's go to Gilbert in Alaska and see what Gilbert thinks.
Gilbert, what is on your mind this evening?
unidentified
Thanks for calling out.
Yeah.
I think you guys are doing solid, man.
Once again, now more than ever, the info war is alive, and it's beating fast.
I like Trump.
I dig Trump.
I always did.
I like what he's doing.
I feel the biggest distraction for him at this point is it's steering him, Donald J. Trump, away from church, the church.
With it taking him away from the church, I feel and I believe he's not listening to Our Father, like He should be, and putting us in a situation where the political and spiritual dogma is taking effect.
It doesn't matter if we're in the lower 48 or I'm all the way up here in Alaska.
It's all the same.
We feel the same way.
We really need to just pick it up and turn it around.
Get back out there.
Get back out there with the church.
Bring the churches together.
Bring back to the church.
We got the younger crowd.
It's falling away from the church and so forth.
And I believe you really need to stick to that.
chase geiser
I absolutely agree with you.
I think that politics is downstream from culture, but it's reciprocal.
It goes both ways.
They both influence one another.
And what we've seen ever since we went off the gold standard in the 70s is basically a downward spiral in every aspect of our civilization and our culture as a result, in my opinion, of the rampant inflation that we've experienced.
I mean, that's why feminism happened, because it justified having both parents having a career when before that was not the norm with traditional marriages.
And then after both parents had a career that developed and went into public education, which then became public indoctrination.
So we've got this depopulation crisis, which is what incentivized the Democrats to allow the invasion of our country, which is what allowed the terrorists into our country, which is why now we have to be concerned about sleeper cells in the United States of America conducting terrorist attacks, not just because terrorist attacks themselves are very deadly, but because they're used as an excuse by our military industrial complex, by our deep state national intelligence apparatus to justify getting us involved in a war in the Middle East.
The same thing happened after 9-11.
So that's what I'm really concerned about.
Yeah, I appreciate it so much, Chase.
dave in arizona
I'll give you the solution to all this at the end, but I'll keep going with my point.
So it's a 30-front war, and we all know that it's the Red-Green Alliance, right?
And it looks like over the past nine days, It's the Cloward-Piven strategy.
And we've been suffering it for decades.
I think you and the crew have noticed, have recognized it for decades.
I was slow.
I didn't really put all the pieces together except the last six years.
But all of this that we're suffering through is funded through the NGOs, which we know the New World Order and President Xi of China control this whole thing.
And that in Satan is just a useful idiot.
But as you touched on just now, the righteous indignation and the fact that politics is downstream from culture, I'll build on that a little bit.
Politics is downstream from culture.
Culture is downstream from religion.
And religion is downstream from faith.
Because of what your last caller, Gilbert, said, we have walked away from the church, and that's how we get this all back.
But we can't be distracted by all this minutia.
And that's what they're trying to do with President Trump now.
I think he's a good man.
He's got a good heart.
I believe he's a Christian.
I think July 13th changed him, Exodus 21-6.
He accepted his role from our father, and he's on the right track.
It's just the deep state is trying to turn him away from God and away from American citizens first.
Thanks again for picking up my call.
I appreciate you so much.
chase geiser
Absolutely.
Alex came back into the studio and has something he wants to share as well.
Go ahead, Alex.
alex jones
I'm not mad at anybody.
Everybody's great.
You guys always do what you want to show you.
Great job.
At the end of the show, I got this information.
This is a big deal.
And Kellen's great too.
And I went in and I just said real fast, hey, put this out as a live show headline.
People need to know this is Iran threatening to hit the detonator for total war.
Because if they are going to hit U.S. bases, And now I looked it up.
They're saying that on their news.
They're not just saying they might.
They're doing it.
We're going to go to direct war.
So this is bigger than what happened yesterday.
I want everybody to know this is big.
And we need to put that on as a live show feed.
It's whenever you guys are ready.
And you're right.
It is all about Belt and Road.
It is about intimidating China.
They've actually said that.
But the larger thing is it's an insane gamble.
And this happens.
It means full war.
And the globalists may false flag even if they don't do it.
So this is way worse.
Things are going downhill real fast.
People know that.
chase geiser
Absolutely.
Dave, thank you for your call.
And it's not just about the attacks from Iran-backed militias overseas.
It's also about the sleeper cell apparatus.
And this has all been staged by the establishment, not just recently in the last couple of weeks, but by all of the policies of the executive branch as well as the unchecked fourth branch of government that is the national security apparatus with our border policy over the course of the last several years, where we allowed in tens of millions of people into the United States illegally.
And of those tens of millions, we know that hundreds of thousands of them come from terrorist countries.
We've shown you the clips time and time again of 30,000 CCP military-aged men standing at parade rest outside the border.
We've showed you the clips of known terrorists just saying, oh, you'll see who I am.
You know who I am.
Now we've got these incidents happening domestically, which traditionally have always been used as an excuse to get into war in the Middle East.
And there are claims here that intelligence, And this is something that they've threatened.
This is something that we've expected.
In fact, we have Hegseth in clip number 15 saying it's not a good idea for Iran to retaliate.
But what do you expect?
They always retaliate.
It's part of their culture that they must retaliate if they're attacked.
Because if they don't, then they lose the faith and trust of their own people.
To believe in any of their ability to stand up to the enemies of Iran.
So let's watch 15 here.
pete hegseth
Would take the breath away of almost any American if you had an opportunity to watch it in real time.
And I think Tehran is certainly calculating the reality that planes flew from the middle of America and Missouri overnight, completely undetected over three of their most highly sensitive sites.
And we were able to destroy nuclear capabilities and our boys in those.
Bombers are on their way home right now.
We believe that'll have a clear psychological impact on how they view the future.
And we certainly hope they take the path of negotiated peace.
But I could not be more proud of how this building operated.
chase geiser
Oh, so it would be a really bad idea for them to retaliate.
But we bombed them knowing that their culture demands that they retaliate every single time, even if it's just vanilla.
I think Alex Jones did a good job showing that clip.
During his show this evening where he talked about how they called him and said, hey, we have to attack, we're going to attack, but it's going to be this location, we're going to attack outside the perimeter of the base, but we just have to have some retaliation or show of force for the sake of our own political strength domestically.
And so we don't just bomb Iran expecting them to yield and believe in peace or be intimidated.
I saw the Krasensteins come out today and they were showing satellite footage of the base before and after the nuclear site before and after the strikes.
And they're saying, see, there's no crater here.
Obviously, these attacks didn't do anything.
And they're right, but for all the wrong reasons.
Because bunker busters don't crater like traditional missiles or bombs.
They go deep underground and then detonate so it doesn't show up on the surface.
The fact of the matter is, it's not about disabling Iran's nuclear capabilities because we know that the bombs that they do have are not in any of those locations.
They've bragged about it and admitted just as much.
And we know that they've likely had the bomb for 15 years at least, maybe even going back as far as 2002, 2001, 2003, when their alleged nuclear program was shut down after they saw what happened to Iraq under claims of weapons of mass destruction.
So yes, they're intimidated and they're fearful, but they're absolutely going to retaliate.
And if we put them in a corner, that's a major problem.
And I believe that we're going to see our bases attacked.
I don't know if it's going to be just superficial in its nature, but this is just the excuse that not the Trump administration, but the military industrial complex and the national security apparatus needs in order to justify getting into a war that they want to get in.
I've been saying this since April of 2024.
As soon as you see Haifa attacked, that's when the United States goes to war.
Last Sunday on this very program I said, as soon as you see Haifa get attacked, that's when the United States goes to war.
And I pulled out headline after headline after headline about how the port in Haifa had been attacked.
It gets attacked more this week and then all of a sudden we're using B-2 bombers after we said that we weren't going to strike them unless they attacked any of our own personnel.
Well, they didn't attack any of our own personnel, and we struck them anyway.
Because now we're hoping that Are these attacks in Iraq or Syria or domestically?
So I don't know if Trump is aware of the depth of this, the seriousness of this, but it's certainly true that our military-industrial complex wants to go to war with Iran, and it's about protecting the exchange of oil and ensuring that the exchange of oil in the region is still done with dollars indefinitely.
So we can sustain our global reserve currency status long enough to figure out what we're going to do before it all implodes on itself and causes the greatest economic collapse in the history of economic collapses right before our eyes.
I'll show you clip 55 here.
This is Pompeo on Fox talking about Iranian sleeper cells.
Here you go.
They are conditioning us.
This is prescriptive programming, folks.
unidentified
You know, I've been talking about this risk for four years.
It's probably even slightly heightened now.
There's no doubt the Iranian regime has tried to put We have active agents on the ground in Europe and Brussels and Paris and London and indeed here in the United States.
And you're absolutely right.
We've had a wide open border.
We know that at least a couple of hundred folks who were already on the American terror-designated watch list who came across the border during the Biden administration.
So that risk is not zero.
It could be that that'll be a method by which the Iranians will choose to try and take vengeance and respond and to deter the United States.
I'm counting on our FBI and local law enforcement to help keep all of us safe, including those who have been threatened directly by the regime itself.
But more importantly than that, I think the Iranians'calculus has to be very careful here.
chase geiser
They have to understand that while we spared the political leadership and energy infrastructure targets last night, So Ozempic Pompeo is just emaciating his own body with chemicals while he emaciates the interests and economy and well-being of the United States with his rhetoric.
It's like he's becoming the drug himself and all of his actions in appearance.
He becomes more demonic looking and gaunt and just fragile.
He's almost like made out of porcelain.
Going up there and talking about all these sleeper cells and all these regime changes.
We have our own apparatus saying that, hey, look, it's not about regime change.
It's about doing things like eradicating the nuclear program within Iran.
When we know they already have nukes.
We have the Marco Rubio saying this.
We have the Hegseth saying this.
We have others saying this.
The Boltons, the Lindsey Graham's, but now they're starting to call for regime change because ultimately what this is about is exactly a mirror of what's happened in Ukraine.
People try to compare it to what happened in Iraq with claims of weapons of mass destruction and then us going in.
And yes, it's similar in that way to that, but it's really more like what we did in 2014 in Ukraine where we overthrew an established government that was under the control of Russia so we could install a new government, a new regime that's under the control of the CIA in the United States.
And then a civil war breaks out, and that's where all this conflict has developed.
That's how it's all developed over the course of the last 10 or 12 years.
Now we're doing the same exact thing in Iran, where right now we have an Iranian regime that is under the control of the CCP, which we are on the cusp of war with, both in space, both in artificial intelligence.
We're in the midst of an economic war with them.
It's all but hot.
And we're trying to do a regime change in Iran so we can install a new government that's a proxy for the United States instead of having to cope with and negotiate with the existing government that is a proxy of the CCP.
That's exactly what's going on here.
The point of the attacks, the point of the escalation is the regime change.
The nuclear claims are just the excuse because we know and have known for many years that Iran already at least has the materials if they haven't assembled the bomb.
And they are days away from the bomb.
And if they're days away from the bomb, that means they already have the material.
You don't just cook up 90% enriched uranium in the crockpot.
24, 48, or 72 hours.
You have that kind of thing.
And then within a few days, you can assemble it, attach it to a ballistic missile, and launch it.
But let's watch clip 16 here.
Is regime change off the table?
Here's Haig South responding to that.
unidentified
So, is regime change off the table, Mr. Secretary?
And to the chairman, you said the battle damage assessment is still ongoing.
But do you believe that some nuclear capability in Iran remains?
pete hegseth
This mission was not and has not been about regime change.
The president authorized a precision operation to neutralize the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program and the collective self-defense of our troops and our ally Israel.
unidentified
Thanks for your question.
I think BDA is still pending.
chase geiser
So Hague's not saying that it's not about regime change because if they explicitly state that it's about regime change, then that might actually cause the regime in Iran to use their nuclear weapon.
They might feel like if they don't, then there's going to be regime change because now the military-industrial complex, the military apparatus of the United States of America, which is famous for losing wars but successfully overthrowing existing governments in the meantime, is saying that they want a regime change.
Now here you have John Bolton.
In clip 47, saying that the right decision to attack Iran took place, that that was the right decision, and that a regime change is appropriate.
Let's watch.
unidentified
I think President Trump made the right decision for America to attack Iran's nuclear weapons program.
And I think we're on the verge of potentially...
I think this is a huge change in the Middle East.
It was a decisive action.
It was the right thing to do.
I thought somebody should do it for a long time, but better late than never.
kasie hunt
Why do you think it is that President Trump did this now?
Obviously, the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, has been pushing to do this for years, including when Trump was president the first time.
unidentified
Right.
Well, I think because of the launching of Iran's war against Israel on October the 7th in 2023, it was going to come down to this at some point anyway.
This is Iran's effort to go after the little Satan, and the next target was the big Satan.
So Israel really faces an existential threat from a nuclear Iran.
But Iran is not just Israel's problem.
Iran is the world's problem.
particularly the US problem and we have now acted against this nuclear proliferation threat it's it's clearly the right thing to do and if Netanyahu is going in first help persuade the president Well, there you have it, folks.
chase geiser
John Bolton, not exactly an American hero.
Not exactly a bastion of America first and world peace.
See, the problem here in the United States is that we have an unchecked fourth branch of government, the intelligence apparatus.
Coupled with the military industrial complex.
They're totally unaccountable.
We know because we catch them in scandal after scandal from MKUltra to Jeffrey Epstein and no one's ever held accountable.
No one ever goes to prison.
And if they cannot blackmail or intimidate an existing administration, then they can at least withhold information or deceive an existing administration.
I have no doubt in my mind that Donald Trump is a man of character, that he believes in America first, that he genuinely wants world peace.
But for some reason, he has been given information which is not abundantly obvious to the people of America or the people of the world, for that matter, that has caused him to make an incredibly difficult decision.
With tremendous implications.
So I'm not walking away from MAGA.
I'm not anti-MAGA now like Mark Levin, who's all forehead, no foreskin, would say.
Because I'm opposed to getting in a war in the Middle East, I've just seen what happens every time we do so.
And yes, it does protect our interests in terms of keeping the dollar, the global reserve currency, but at what cost?
If our money costs hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives to sustain itself, And this is an indefinite problem, a chronic problem, that maybe we have to have a fundamental change in our domestic monetary policy or our global monetary policy to prevent this type of conflict from being necessary.
Folks, we're going to get more into it on the other side.
I've got George Papadopoulos coming up at the top of the hour.
We have major breaking news about these Iranian proxy militias allegedly about to attack U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria, almost certainly going to be attacking any carriers that interfere with The trade corridor being closed off successfully, shut down successfully by Iran.
And there's just like 18 different ways that this conflict could result in actual World War III, not colloquial or hyperbolic World War III, but actual World War III.
And there's only maybe one, two, maybe three, if there's a miracle, different ways that we could weasel our way out of this.
So we're going to be breaking all this down on the other side, showing more clips, more analysis.
In the meantime, please go to thealexjonesstore.com.
This is your last chance tonight to get two bottles of methylene blue, either in capsule form or in liquid form, whatever you prefer.
And then get a free bottle of the Shilajit gummies for free.
And that Shilajit is absolutely amazing.
It oozes out of mountains like the blood of giants.
Nobody even knows where it comes from.
It'll make you feel like an Olympian hero.
please go to the Alex Jones store.com, not just for your health, but for humanity too.
unidentified
Welcome back to Sunday Night Live.
I am Chase Geiser, your host this evening.
chase geiser
Just a day after the United States of America bombed Iran.
And this is something that we've been talking about for a long time.
It's something I've been talking about for many months.
It's something that people have been speculating about and even advocating for for at least 20 or 30 years.
And everyone always likes to use the excuse like, oh, there's weapons of mass destruction in so-and-so country, so we have to go in.
Oh, so-and-so leader is committing crimes against humanity in so-and-so country, so we have to go in.
Of course, that's Iraq and Libya, respectively.
And then now we've got this nuclear weapons thing going on, and it's so obvious that it's a front.
Because if they really believed it, because Netanyahu said it, or they have some sort of intelligence, then why didn't they do this so long ago?
I mean, after all, this is something that's been said by world leaders for many decades, that they're just on the cusp of nuclear weapons in Iran, three days away, three weeks away, one year away, six months away.
They're always just about ready there, like taking steps halfway to the wall over and over again.
You find that you get infinitely closer, but you're never there.
I'm going to walk 10 yards.
And the wall is 20 yards away, and then I get there, and then I walk 5 yards, and the wall is 10 yards away.
And you just go half and half and half, and you're infinitely closer, and you're never there.
So obviously, there's not some remarkable urgency here that wasn't there before, if they were telling the truth before.
And we know that they lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
We got in, oops, sorry about that.
Well, good thing we were here anyway.
It was so convenient for us to seize all this cash and ensure that oil will be traded in U.S. dollars.
And then now with Iran, they're claiming that they don't have the nuke and we have to prevent them from getting it because if the public was made aware that they've had it for many years, then it would prove to the public that Iran is capable of having a nuclear weapon without using it for an extended period of time, that diplomacy is possible, that they are more reasonable than we would like to think despite the fact that we have all seen the footage of them shouting death to America and all that propagandist crap and trash.
I'm disgusted by the people of Iran.
This regime in Iran, just as much as anybody else, doesn't mean I want to go to war with them unnecessarily when it could, after all, risk the lives of every human walking on the face of the planet Earth.
So they can't admit that they have the nuke because that proves that they can have a nuke without using it immediately.
So we know that they have a nuke, then why are we attacking them if we know that they have a nuke and we know that they can hold a nuke without using it?
Well, then there must be some other incentive.
You just look at what this administration has done over the course of the last six months.
Many beautiful, amazing, outstanding things entered into the artificial intelligence race.
The space wars with the Golden Dome imposed the tariffs on China, weakening China so that it cannot fund places like Iran, which it does, by the way, because it's so dependent on Iranian oil.
They're reciprocally dependent on one another.
Very similar to the relationship between China and the United States is the relationship between China and Iran.
They need each other.
China needs them for energy and Iran needs them for their economy.
And so if they can't support Iran and we attack them and we know that they're going to cut off this Hormuz Strait, which harms China, then that gives China an excuse to get involved in this conflict in the name of, hey, we need this energy.
And we've seen articles like that with Russian leaders and other leaders saying that several countries are ready to give Iran a nuclear weapon.
We know that China has been conspiring with Iran to destabilize the region so we can't develop the IMEC corridor to compete with the Belt and Road.
And a longstanding, long-lasting war or conflict as intense as the one would be in Iran between Israel and Iran, which is between the United States and China.
Would destabilize the region long enough to delay the development of the IMEC corridor, which could allow the CCP to establish the Belt and Road corridor and basically get a trade monopoly in the entire region.
But here is Tom Cotton in clip 35 telling us about how we have to be prepared for Iran to retaliate.
This all comes right as we see breaking news from the New York Times that intelligence officials have detected signs that Iran-backed militias are preparing to attack U.S. bases in Iraq and possibly Syria.
Let's watch.
tom cotton
I think we have to be prepared for Iran to retaliate.
And I joined the president in his warning to the supreme leader of Iran that if he targets Americans, the military force he will see will make last night look like child's play.
We have troops in the region.
Iran has targeted Americans around the world in marine barracks in Beirut, in barracks in Saudi Arabia.
They've targeted embassies of countries around the world.
For all we know, they may have gotten sleeper cells into the country during Joe Biden's wide-open border.
So the threats are serious, and we take them seriously.
President Trump has no higher priority, as do I, than the safety of the American people.
And again, the Supreme Leader and the Ayatollahs in Iran need to understand that President Trump means business.
They have a chance to sue for peace here.
To dismantle whatever remnants of their nuclear program remain and to continue to actually survive.
Because we haven't targeted the Supreme Leader.
We haven't targeted their energy infrastructure.
We haven't targeted other critical infrastructure.
That's an implicit message that Iran still has things that they hold dear that neither the United States nor Israel has struck.
Iran needs to heed President Trump's warning.
chase geiser
Well, let me tell you something.
The only time that Tom Cotton and Lindsey Graham have ever tried to actually save The American taxpayer any money is when they go on a work trip and they decide to share a hotel room.
But we see all the rhetoric from the Boltons, from the Lindsey Grahams, from the Tom Cottons, from the Dan Crenshaws, from the Mark Levins, all these neoconservatives who just love war, war, war, war, war, and they make any excuse, but they won't tell you the real reason.
So you have to dig in and do all this incredible research and try to find a way to get in touch with people who are actually experts on economics and international trade and foreign policy to understand what's really going on because they understand.
That the real reason we're getting involved in this conflict is too nuanced for the people of America to understand.
Not because it's actually too nuanced for the people of America to understand, but because they have that degree of a lack of respect for our people.
So instead they say, hey look, they're going to retaliate and we're going to have to do something.
And we absolutely did the right thing by provoking them, even though we said we weren't going to strike them if they didn't strike us.
And then when they didn't strike us, we struck them anyway.
And now we're telling them not to retaliate because we're finally ready for peace when we weren't ready for peace before we even started this war.
I mean, it's just unbelievable to me.
This is Iran TV responding in clip 7 here.
I'm going to read the subtitles to you.
Let's just see how happy the Iranians are about this.
They are definitely a legitimate target of Iran.
The U.S. has committed a crime against Iran by violating Iran's airspace and it has no place in the West Asian.
Mr. President of the United States, you started it and we will finish it.
There you go.
Do I think that Iran could win a war with the United States?
Well, I think that we would probably leave Iran without completely winning the war, but the existing regime would not be the regime in power.
It would be some other government.
Probably just as bad, if not worse.
Do I think Iran could win a war with Israel?
Probably not.
Maybe.
I don't know.
But I do think that they're very hyperbolic and verbose and they like to say all these threats because it's about being a strong man and they have to puff out their chests otherwise their own people might rise up against them.
Because they are, frankly, this existing regime is very unpopular and our leaders like to use that as an excuse to justify a regime change in the region.
But there are so many leaders in so many other places that are abundantly unpopular.
The United States has nothing to do with regime changes there.
We only get involved in these conflicts when they have something to do with the U.S. dollar.
We got involved in World War I and World War II because we were trying to dominate the ocean.
We were attacked in the ocean, so then we got involved.
Now space is the new frontier.
Economics is the new frontier.
Artificial intelligence is the new frontier.
We're entering into a metaphysical information war much different than any front we've ever fought on before as a species, not only as a nation.
And as we enter into this brave new world, which is really proving itself to be a quite cowardly new world, we find that we have set up a system that guarantees indefinite war and lie after lie in order to justify those wars, and it's all because we, the American people, aren't paying enough attention?
It's all because we, the American people, are just following orders.
And by the way, do you honestly think that those strikes last night destroyed whatever nuclear bombs or materials that Iran had?
We told them for like two weeks we were going to do it, or we might do it, or we were thinking about doing it.
You don't think they moved some things around?
I know people get in a fight with their wife or their girlfriend.
They move everything out of their house within 12 hours, sometimes one night.
You don't think that Iran maybe, I don't know, got their version of a U-Haul, loaded stuff up and moved it, or just didn't even have it there to begin with in the first place?
This is clip number 10 of Pasobik talking about whether or not it is reasonable to assume that we had any effect on Iran's nuclear program.
Is this true?
unidentified
You can just press one button and get rid of Iran's uranium enrichment site?
Or, potentially, is there some magical thinking going on here?
Well, it's magical thinking, Jack.
I mean, you and I both, you did targeting packages.
I had inputs to targeting packages.
I've been on, I've been a planner, military planner, where we have to look at the range of things regarding a campaign, everything from kinetic strikes to special operations force options.
And this is the deal regarding Cordeaux.
You would have to have a strike package of 10 B-2 spirit bombers coming in.
One after the other within about three minutes, dropping the organs.
So these are penetrators.
But, Jack, to get to the level we're talking, you're going to have to have ten, count them, ten of those penetrators get deep enough to have an effect.
That's how deep this thing is.
And then, oh, by the way, what happens if we have to go in and verify we did the job we said we did?
Oh, by the way, what happens to the radiation?
That comes spewing out once you penetrate the facility.
So General Tony Zinni, the commander of Central Command, one of my friends and mentors, told me that Bill Clinton, this is back in the 90s, Bill Clinton would ask him, hey, General Zinni, can you do X?
Can you defeat X?
And Zinni would say, yeah, I can do that.
But then what?
So I think, Jack, as much as we can talk about origins, we can talk about effects.
Nobody can actually define what our end state is or what would happen if we do this.
The then what seems to be the piece that everybody is missing, and I think President Trump has got it.
That's why he's taken a deep breath and thinking about this before we act.
chase geiser
Look, and I appreciate Donald Trump, and I trust him as a human being and as a leader.
I just know that this is an incredibly risky situation to be in, and the reasons that we're using for being in this situation and making the decisions that we're making are not the real reasons.
I don't know if Trump knows that, and he thinks it's in the interests of our national security to lie about it, or if he himself has been deceived by this military-industrial complex, this intelligence community, which has manipulated and blackmailed president after president basically forever.
I mean, we know that there's never been a president of the United States who had true control over the intelligence apparatus, and as soon as one tried to take control, we saw what happened to him.
But what we've seen is the initial response was, this is great, we have now disarmed their nukes, and then it's, oh, they might have some more.
And now the rhetoric's kind of turned into, it might not have been effective enough, maybe we have to do more.
We know that there's way more planes ready for these bombings and these operations than were actually used last night.
I mean, this is just the beginning of a long story of escalation after escalation.
Let's look at clip 11 here.
This is Vance, right after the fact, coming out and saying that we did an awesome job and the Iranians are terrible at war, even though we haven't won a war since 1945.
jd vance
That program is now destroyed.
They tried to build a conventional missile program to attack neighbors in the region.
That missile program has shown to be a failure.
They have funded terrorism aggressively in the region, and now most of their terrorism proxies are destroyed.
The Iranians are clearly not very good at war.
Perhaps they should follow President Trump's lead and give peace a chance.
If they're serious about it, I guarantee you the President of the United States is too.
chase geiser
You think they're just gonna stand down?
When have they ever stood down?
Afghanistan never stood down.
Iraq never stood down.
They were met with overwhelming force.
What always happens in these regions is we have to get boots on the ground.
And China's gonna be intimately involved with this conflict because of the interdependence with Iran and the implications for the region and the fact that we're witnessing a dying China as its demographic implodes.
It's incredibly vulnerable.
It's in an AI and space race with us right now.
It's trying to establish a monopoly on trade right before our eyes.
And we are crippling it with tariffs, which I agree with.
We should not rely on China to supply all of our goods.
We saw what happened during the COVID pandemic, which they spread intentionally across the world, mind you.
The tariffs were absolutely necessary.
Building the IMEC corridor, probably necessary to ensure that the CCP doesn't have total dominance into the 21st century.
But the fact of the matter is, if you look at all these details, it's so obvious, if you just pay attention, that what happened last night is not some spontaneous surprise, but something that has been planned for many years, probably before Donald Trump even dreamed of becoming the president of the United States.
What happened last night was the culmination of a decades-long strategy by our deep state and Israel and other special interests to get the United States involved in a war with Iran.
Because our deep state understands that Iran is a proxy for China and that China is an incredible threat to the national security of the United States because of its explicit campaign against our currency.
Which is basically the only reason that we have any value, power, or strength left.
Because we sacrificed everything else.
Our culture, our capitalism, our entrepreneurism, our free market, our Christianity, our faith, our families.
I mean, basically everything that you would see in a Norman Rockwell painting has been thrown into the abyss, thrown into the pit, sacrificed to Mullick or the Great Owl of Bohemian Grove for the sake of lining the pockets of those who participate in the political industrial complex of the United States, both elected officials and bureaucrats and contractors all alike.
And that's why the Lindsey Grahams and the Tom Cottons spend as much money as possible, just like the Nancy Pelosi's or the ALC's spend as much money as possible.
That's why what we're seeing now is not the United States trying to have a third party where it's Democrats versus Republicans versus MAGA or versus America First.
Right now, we're seeing the United States try to have a second party.
It's been a one-party system for many years.
Finally, we had MAGA and America First.
We totally eradicated, neutralized, destroyed the globalist movement, the leftist movement in this country on a political level.
I mean, we just eradicated, sterilized all of our institutions of their influence and power and peddling as soon as we elected Donald Trump to be the president of the United States.
And all we see now is the schism between neoconservatism and America first.
The real two parties are neoconservatism.
And they're both lying about each other.
The neoconservatives are lying about who's MAGA and who isn't because they're trying to hijack the momentum of the brand and the word and what it means.
But they are showing their cards so brazenly.
Some of them are just so emotionally relying on our current president that they can't admit when he does anything wrong.
And I think that he's 80% awesome.
But 20% of the time, I'm going to call him on it.
It's not betrayal.
It's just my opinion, man.
So we have some people in our movement who, as soon as you criticize even one iota of something that Trump says or does, it means that you're a traitor.
It means that you're not really America first or you're being paid by guitar or some other shill.
I mean, it's just absolute lunacy.
While we have another movement that insists that we should get in war with Iran because they have protests over there where they shout death to America.
Or they insist that we should have a regime change in Iran because maybe they'll have a nuclear weapon one day?
This is some minority report behavior here if we're actually getting involved in this war because we've predicted future crime and identified it, and so we're trying to prevent it from even happening in the first place.
I mean, that's bizarre stuff right there.
Fact of the matter is, this conflict has nothing to do with nukes and has everything to do with Threaten our ability to ensure that oil, whether it's in Iran or some other country in the Middle East, is traded in U.S. dollars.
Threaten our ability to diversify our manufacturing away from China and into India, and then into the IMEC corridor, which we've been talking about, And since China is such a threat to the dollar being the global reserve currency, I mean, this is really the greatest national security threat in the United States of America.
Since it is such a real and true threat, but it's set up and positioned in such a way that we can't explicitly state so because of the implications for the market and the admission that our dollar is worth absolutely nothing that would come from our leaders admitting what's really going on.
We make up other excuses to get involved in these wars, and it makes us look incredibly unjust.
Because we do things like, say, we won't strike you unless you strike us and then we strike them anyway.
We do things like, say, you could have nukes really soon when they already have nukes.
And look, I know a lot of people think that it's Israel trying to get us into this war.
Let me tell you, folks, we are two peas in a pod with Mossad.
We are two peas in a pod with Israel.
Israel works for the CIA, not the other way around.
When Israel blackmails our politicians through people like Epstein and others, it's probably, almost certainly, in fact, at the behest of the CIA, so our own intelligence apparatus can have that leverage on our political class without having a paper trail.
We tell Israel what to do in exchange for them getting a bunch of money and security, and they do our dirty work for us.
And yes, Netanyahu is trying to get us involved in this war, but he's trying to help our politicians justify to our people that we should get involved in the war.
they're saying it's about nukes and anti-Semitism when really it's about the IMEC corridor and the U.S. dollar and the amount of money that Israel stands to make, Bibi Netanyahu personally stands to make, and the United States of America stands to make if we secure trade in the region and basically allow the CCP to totally collapse.
But the problem is...
That's not the issue.
The issue is that we're not actually addressing the fundamental problem, which is the fact that our money is a lie.
We're not doing things like talking about the International Bank of Settlements.
Or the International Monetary Fund.
Or the Federal Reserve.
I mean, some people like Ron Paul and Thomas Massey are talking about auditing the Fed and ending the Fed.
And it's cute and I like them and they're good people and they're honest and they're true and they're principled.
But we're not addressing the fact that our money is fundamentally worthless and nobody wants to deal with the massive disruption that would take place if we were to actually fix the problem.
I mean, it's like being incredibly ill.
And having to have some massive surgery on your heart to ensure that you live.
But this surgery could totally cause your liver and your kidney to fail and your lungs to fail and your brain to fail while it's being done.
You have to do it.
But the consequences and the risks are so alarming and terrifying that every surgeon's like, not me, maybe this guy.
It's like you're getting referred over and passed off to doctor after doctor after doctor.
And if Donald Trump isn't going to be the doctor, the surgeon that fixes our currency, I don't know who it's going to be.
This is what shocks me about this so much.
He has a plan.
Maybe this is 5D chess.
And he's just trying to buy time by keeping the dollar strong while he develops the Golden Dome and we create some sort of alternative energy that we can then license out to the rest of the world, thereby diverting our currency away from being oil-backed to just straight-up energy, infinite energy-backed by licensing rights to consume our energy.
I don't know.
I hope that's it.
And I do trust Trump and I like him.
But getting involved in another war in the Middle East for the same reasons that we've always gotten involved in another war in the Middle East is just as evil as it was before.
It's the same thing.
And he's not like the Dick Cheney's who did it because they wanted their military industrial complex contractors to get kickbacks and they were invested and they were getting kickbacks personally.
He's not doing it in the same way that LBJ was so that munitions could be purchased for Vietnam and 250,000 rounds could be expended in that war per enemy combatant killed.
Up from 46,000 in World War II.
He's not doing it for corrupt reasons.
But we have such an evil and corrupt system in place that good people can't work within it to fix it.
It cannot be cured from within.
It has to be transcended and disrupted and replaced.
And the globalists want to replace it with their new world order, globalist conglomeration of all political power and central bank digital currencies, which, by the way, Donald Trump did sign an executive order making central bank digital currencies illegal to be used in the United States of America.
One of the first things he did as president of the United States because he understands the globalist threat.
The globalists have the post-collapse infrastructure in place.
They're trying to cause the infrastructure.
China has its own post-collapse infrastructure in place.
They're trying to cause this collapse.
And the United States is trying to buy as much time as possible.
Some elements and components of the United States, because they're abundantly corrupt and just lining their own pockets and they want the American people to suffer, they don't care.
They're willing to do inflation after inflation after inflation if it means that their gains are greater than the loss of buying power.
As long as the market goes up faster, then we lose buying power.
But Donald Trump's going in there and he's thinking, wow, this war with China, if I don't do something about this right now, no one's ever going to do anything.
And he knows it's abundantly unpopular, and he was willing to sacrifice the midterms by making the decision that he made last night.
I don't think it's a decision that he made lightly.
I'm not prepared to say that I agree with it because I don't want World War III and a radiated planet with radiated men eating the flesh of radiated men, as Charles Bukowski famously wrote.
In his poem, Born Into This.
But we've put it, we've put the presidency in a position where good men cannot do good things.
And so they have to find a way to justify with doing the wrong thing for the right reasons.
But we know that utilitarianism and Machiavellianism is antithetical To what God told us.
And maybe that's why Donald Trump spontaneously invoked God off script at the end of his statements last night.
Maybe he understands the implications of what's just been done.
But more on the other side with our esteemed guest, George Papadopoulos.
One of my favorite people to speak with.
Absolute expert genius on foreign policy, trade, and all the implications of what's happening in the Middle East right now.
Make sure, in the meantime, that you go to thealexjonesstore.com and take advantage of this last opportunity tonight to get two bottles of methylene blue either in capsule or liquid form and a bottle of Shilajit gummies for free.
And don't just get them because they're awesome.
Get them because it keeps Alex Jones, this crew, and this operation on the air.
unidentified
Stay with us.
chase geiser
So a lot of people are saying that Israel's trying to get the United States into a war with Iran, but it's actually more complicated than that.
The United States wants to get into a war with Iran.
unidentified
Here's why.
chase geiser
So back in 1971, Nixon took us off of the gold standard because, well, we were printing more money than we had backed by gold.
All of our allies called us on it.
We knew we didn't have the gold to pay them, so Nixon just took us off the gold standard.
But since the dollar was no longer backed by gold, we had to back it with something else.
So Nixon negotiated the OPEC petrodollar, where he ensured that all the Middle Eastern nations would trade oil using U.S. dollars, which created an artificial demand for the dollar, even though it wasn't backed by anything.
This is the reason that we were able to remain the global reserve currency and protect the dollar, despite the fact that it was worthless.
Decades went by, and we needed to ensure that oil would always be traded in dollars, so we got involved in coup after coup and war after war.
Wars like the ones in Afghanistan, Iraq, we assassinated Gaddafi from Libya, all people who threatened to trade oil in something other than the dollar.
Iran's doing the same thing today, as well as China, supporting Iran because, well, they want to be the global reserve currency, not the United States.
Now, since we've been applying so much pressure to China and the entire region for the course of the last, like, For over 50 years or so, China has tried to establish the Belt and Road Initiative, which is something that they mean to use to undermine the dollar's global reserve currency by establishing a trade monopoly in the entire hemisphere.
You can see it there on that video.
Interesting enough, Bibi Netanyahu, a month before the October 7th terrorist attacks happened in Israel, announced the IMEC Corridor, which is meant to go through Saudi Arabia from India and to the port of Haifa in Israel.
Now, we all know what happened exactly a month later.
There was this terrorist attack, what appeared to be a stand-down, which Bibi Netanyahu has used to justify it, basically wiping out every breathing thing in the Gaza Strip.
The reason they're committing a genocide over there?
Well, it's because you can't establish a trade corridor through the port of Haifa if Haifa, like in this video, is always being bombed by terrorists.
So they decided that there was no two state solution.
What they were going to do was just coax them in to commit a terrorist attack and then use that atrocity as an excuse to just So does Israel want a war with Iran?
Absolutely.
They stand to make a lot of money off of this IMEC corridor.
But so does the United States.
The United States wants this war with Iran because it will be a proxy war with China.
Which will allow us to establish the IMEC corridor and save the fake dollar for the time being and remain the global reserve currency.
So ultimately, all these conflicts in the Middle East have nothing to do with democratic values or religious ideals.
They have everything to do with money.
unidentified
Tonight, Sunday Night Live unveils the hidden truths behind today's headlines with your host, Chase Geiser.
chase geiser
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to Sunday Night Live.
I am Chase Geiser, your host for the next 58 minutes.
And I am honored and overjoyed, frankly, to be sitting with George Papadopoulos, at least virtually.
I've been very impressed with your work.
I love your book, Deep State Target.
And you were the first person that introduced me to what is the IMEC Corridor.
And George, you're an expert.
You're so much smarter than I am, especially on what's going on right now.
So please feel totally comfortable.
Would tell me if I'm absolutely retarded, okay?
So my thinking about this conflict with Iran and the U.S. involvement in it is that it's actually a proxy between China and the United States.
So Israel represents the United, in my mind, Israel represents the United States.
Iran represents China in this proxy war because China has an imploding population.
They're desperate to establish trade dominance through Belt and Road and basically that side of the planet.
We're trying to institute this IMEC corridor to compete with that so they don't get the monopoly and then subvert the dollars, the global reserve currency.
I believe Alex Jones, when he tells me in the audience that he has had intel for 15 years that Iran has had a bomb.
And so I'm operating under the assumption that they probably already have one and have for many years.
I could be totally wrong about that.
And my thinking is that, just like with Iraq and weapons of mass destruction, that Iranian nuclear capabilities are just an excuse being used to get us involved in this conflict, which is really more about protecting the dollars, the global reserve currency, than it is about ensuring that Iran never has a nuke.
And it seems like we're trying to install a regime there.
That represents the United States instead of the existing one, which seems to represent the CCP.
Tell me if I'm retarded.
Explain what's going on.
unidentified
Yeah, Chase, thanks a lot for having me.
Look, I think in many ways you're very spot on.
And I think this is the big picture that no one really understands.
Because when you focus on these conflicts, whether they're in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, on the African continent, or Latin America, you view them as these disparate events that are completely isolated, that don't fit into any existing nodes, any infrastructure, trade networks, energy routes, alliance structures.
So you get the headlines, for example, Hamas terrorists kill Israeli civilians and heinous October 7th attack, which happened.
Then you get Putin moves into Ukraine.
without any pretext, just because he's a madman.
And that's the situation there.
And now, of course, you have the Iranian situation, which has been something that the neocons and the various interest groups in the Middle East and some within the Washington establishment have wanted for decades.
And what I think is really going on here, you have to look at just the public pronouncements from the leadership of people like President Putin, Xi Jinping in China, President Trump.
What have they all said?
On one side, meaning China and Russia and Iran, They all espouse this idea of multipolarity, that the bipolar framework ceases to exist.
The United States is no longer the sole superpower.
In fact, when the U.S. is the sole superpower, we have endless conflict, forever wars, and utter destruction.
So what China, Russia, and Iran, and even North Korea and some of these other countries have said publicly is, we want to basically curtail the global reach of the United States.
We want to rewrite the global trade architecture, finance, security, and basically stop the U.S. from having a global trade dominance as a global currency reserve, meaning the U.S. dollar.
Now, you explained in the short clip in the beginning of this conversation about Nixon, the gold standard, the petrodollar.
That's absolutely correct.
So now, under Biden, what really happened was BRICS, this alternative.
To the U.S. dollar as a global reserve currency started to take form.
The U.S. had no real leadership, but these other countries basically coalesced and said, we're going to torpedo the U.S. dollar, or not maybe even torpedo the U.S. dollar, but just create a competition to the U.S. dollar.
We're going to start trading in our own currencies.
There's going to be cross-denominated trade in the yuan, in the ruble, various other currencies.
And this had a major impact.
On how President Trump, I believe, viewed Iran and even the U.S. dollar.
Because just looking back at one of his first Truth Social posts, he said, if you trade outside of the U.S. dollar, we will sanction you.
President Trump campaigned on, and he won on, and he's executing a policy on safeguarding the U.S. dollar as a dominant global currency reserve.
So when you have these basically diametrically opposed viewpoints, You look at Iran.
Iran is one of the biggest oil producers, natural gas producers.
China just invested $400 billion in Iran.
It controls the Strait of Hormuz where 20% of global energy bypasses on a daily basis.
They have alliances with Russia and with Pakistan and even North Korea.
So the game has completely changed.
So this whole notion...
I find it absurd, and I think that's really what we have to be looking at moving forward.
chase geiser
Well, do you think it was really the objective of the Trump administration to disable whatever Nuclear capabilities that Iran had, because it seems to me that that might be what they say publicly, but this might actually be more about trying to institute a regime change for the sake of ensuring that China can't by proxy destabilize the region and then inhibit the development of the IMEC corridor competing with the Belt and Road.
unidentified
No, I think that's really what it is.
And when you're at the level of war and international peace and security, like I said, there's no disparate or isolated events.
They're all connected.
And I think Iran is a critical node for both Russia and China for different purposes.
One, obviously, Iran is selling drones, and they have military assistance and technological joint development with Russia.
And China, obviously, has invested, as I explained on what you just presented, $300 to $400 billion in investment just a couple of years ago.
And they view Iran as a massive role in this one belt, one road structure that they are trying to create and develop to basically cut out the Americans, cut out some of these other countries so that the Chinese don't have to rely on the Blue Sea, the South China Sea, or the Pacific.
to both get oil, natural gas, and trade because they fear the U.S. Navy.
So that's what all of these routes going through Central Asia, Iran, into Turkey are all about.
So I think with this IMEC corridor, which you explained, the India-Middle East-Europe corridor is all about, and why successive U.S. presidents have endorsed it from President Biden to now President Trump during his meeting with Modi in the Oval Office.
One of the critical things they talked about was the U.S. supports IMEX.
And people are saying, what's IMEX?
People have no idea what these initiatives are, what they mean from geopolitics, economic, from the geopolitical standpoint, how they're going to affect the global trade routes.
And this is why China is waiting and watching very closely.
They have invested far too much in the one belt, one road and multipolarity.
To just allow Iran to basically be taken over and have a puppet, if you want to call it that, installed there.
So people will say, well, Iran is the weakest it's ever been.
I agree with that.
There's been a systematic effort to defang Iran and its proxies.
And let's just look at the facts.
Hamas has been completely decimated.
Hezbollah's leader, Nasrallah, former leader, has been wiped off the face of the planet.
The pager issue with Hezbollah completely decimated.
Their personnel and their morale.
The new leader that Hezbollah currently has is not a charismatic figure.
And the Houthis, after they were striking and affecting global shipping and the U.S. getting involved, seized, dropped their weapons.
So Iran doesn't have the reach into the Mediterranean that they once did.
But what they do have, unlike before, is the structure of China and Russia and North Korea and even India to some extent.
This is really what the competing issue is going to be moving forward.
And Iran, just like Ukraine, is a proxy between the United States and China the way that Ukraine is a proxy between Russia and NATO.
And they're both going to see a lot of destabilization.
chase geiser
Tell me a little bit about the relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Obviously, it was famously depicted.
It's gonna go down in history.
It's a very famous deal that Trump made.
The Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the billions upon billions, 600 billion to a trillion dollars estimated in trade with a nation which was literally brought to tears by the honor of a US president appearing before them.
I mean, if you look at the crown prince on the tarmac, seeing Donald Trump off, he looked like he was about ready to weep almost.
Tell me about...
I look at October 7th and what it was able to justify in terms of stabilization of the region.
I'm trying to word this in a way that's not offensive so that we can talk explicitly about it.
And I look at what's happening with Iran.
It seems like a perfect orchestrated domino effect that's been in the works even since before this administration.
So I'm very curious to know if any of these recent developments between the United States and Saudi Arabia are directly connected to what just took place or transpired last night between the United States and Iran.
unidentified
Well, it's interesting you mention that because Iran and Saudi Arabia have actually had a thaw in their relationship over the last couple of years, vis-a-vis during the first Trump administration, where I think Mohammed bin Salman, the leader in Saudi Arabia, was basically equating Iran's leadership to the Nazis and saying if they get some sort of nuclear weapon, we'll have another nuclear holocaust.
That type of rhetoric all abided and just stopped.
And that there was this growing effort to basically have some sort of detente or some sort of relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
On the other hand, every country is putting themselves first, including the United States, Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Oman, the GCC, United Arab Emirates.
And what they've basically analyzed is said that we now have the United States in a position where they're codependent with us, meaning the GCC.
We buy their military infrastructure.
We host their naval and air facilities here.
And we are basically replacing, in many ways, adversarial countries like China for foreign direct investments in critical infrastructure in the United States.
So for them, actually having a peace agreement or some sort of new rapprochement between the United States and Iran that can open up Iran to the West.
That could open up Iranian oil and natural gas exports to Europe.
That really kind of curtails the GCC's influence, regardless if they want to prevent a war between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
And I'll just land on this.
The Parliament of Iran just today decided that they're going to close the Strait of Hormuz.
Who has the most to actually lose from this?
It's the Europeans.
The Europeans right now.
I have lost a lot of contracts with Gazprom, which is the Russian state-owned natural gas company, which basically connects the European continent with Russia for natural gas because of sanctions.
They then were relying on the Strait of Hormuz for natural gas from Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
And now, if that shuts down, you're going to see inflation spike on the European continent.
The economies are already in a horrendous state.
And they're going to have to overtly rely on US LNG, which is great for America, but it's very bad for the European continent.
So that's another group, besides China and Russia, that I'm looking at very closely to see how France is reacting, how the European Union is reacting.
You have people like Macron in France basically calling for greater autonomy of Europe, less reliance on the United States, trying to negotiate an agreement with Iran before things get too bad, because they understand that I think they've been played.
And the United States and China have actually come out winners in the Ukraine conflict and this potential conflict with Iran, while countries like Russia and even the European Union are big losers.
So this is really, I mean, it's a little complicated, but this is a massive juggling act that a lot of countries right now are looking at how they're going to strike a right balance for their own interests.
chase geiser
I was interested to see this week, to observe this week that the administration kept posturing Especially earlier in this conflict between Israel and Iran, that this wasn't America's war.
We wanted peace in the region.
Don't strike any of our military personnel.
Otherwise, you'll be met with overwhelming force.
At least implying, if not explicitly stating, probably even explicitly stating, but I certainly got the implication that we were not going to get involved unless we were attacked first.
And that attack never seemed to really come directly on American personnel.
In the region.
And we went and bombed anyway.
And we know culturally that Iran always responds, at least even if it's even a superficial response, it's a response to being attacked, whether it's from Israel or others.
It's part of their culture that they just have to retaliate to save face in some form.
Now we see reports that the New York Times is saying intelligence officials have detected signs that Iran-backed militias are preparing to attack US bases in Iraq and possibly Syria.
We've got others in the administration coming out and saying that they're concerned sleeper cells are going to be activated domestically here in the United States of America.
Obviously, we know that hundreds of thousands of people from very questionable areas came into the United States under the Biden administration, including 30,000 military-aged men from the CCP.
Does it look to you, as it looks to me, like the existing administration, and I'm not blaming Trump for this, but the existing establishment thought that Iran was going to attack us in order to justify what we wanted to do anyway, and then when they didn't, we just did it?
unidentified
Look, I think that the war preparations for a conflict with Iran have been ongoing for probably the last 40 years.
The fall of the Shah, I think there have been contingency plans for how the United States or other countries would eventually get involved, because Iran is too lucrative of a country and too strategically located to allow to be deemed as, one, a pariah in the eyes of the West, or two, some sort of thorn in our side.
So whether Iran decides—and Iran, look, Iran has attacked.
American personnel.
They've held our hostage.
They've had hostages of ours.
You know, they've funded proxies that have destabilized the Middle East.
And the reality is, we have absolutely no idea who's in this country right now based on the intentional catastrophe of an open border policy by the Biden administration.
Now, here's what Iran is saying publicly.
And first of all, this is what President Trump is saying publicly.
If Iran attacks us, whether in the United States or And we should.
Because if a country does attack our people, they should be matched with resounding force.
And that's the president's preeminent role, is to protect the U.S. homeland and its citizens.
Now, is Iran on a suicide mission to save face?
I don't think so.
So what I think Iran basically is expecting to do here is to maintain a one-versus-one conflict with Israel.
Israel is a country that's smaller than New Jersey.
It's been hit extremely hard by Iranian ballistic missiles.
They've had a lot of casualties.
And this issue right now is going to be who can actually withstand this war of attrition for the longest.
Will it be Israel?
Will it be Iran?
And like you said, Iran really doesn't have much to lose at this point.
Their economy's in tatters.
They're facing a generational inflation crisis.
They're basically isolated from the world, except from dealing indirectly with Russia and more directly with China.
So they have a lot less to lose in the United States and Israel.
So that's something that the United States, whether they took that into the calculation when they made these attacks, I think they did.
But I don't see Iran, I'll just land on this chase, I don't see Iran hitting our people in the Middle East or attacking us.
What I do think you'll have are some sort of sleeper cells activated.
We have absolutely no idea who's going to actually be activating them.
There will probably be some carnage here in the United States and that likely will be used as a pretext to continue the conflict in the Middle East.
So I just highly suggest people stay vigilant.
Be very careful because I think things are going to get a lot worse before they get better.
I don't think this is over.
chase geiser
Yeah, that brings me to my next question.
What do you think is going to happen next?
unidentified
Yeah, I think we will likely see some sort of issue in the United States.
I just think statistically, with an open border for four years, with hundreds of thousands, potentially, of military-aged males from countries like China, Iran, India, Pakistan, on the African continent, They're not, those guys are not here to put up drywall.
They're not here to pick up strawberries or to, you know, These people were strategically placed on the southern border to traverse that open border, to wait in plain sight or sometimes in hidden places for this type of moment.
The United States right now is in a fiscal crisis.
It's an educational crisis.
We have an infrastructure crisis in this country.
We have not still passed the Big Beautiful Bill, which I do believe will be passed.
So we're facing a lot of issues here at home.
And I think if there is a terrorist attack in this country, that will have the potential to destabilize the economy.
It will have the potential to suck the United States into a war of attrition in the Middle East.
And it might affect this next midterms.
People are forgetting that global events are affecting domestic policies.
If we lose the midterms because of an attack domestically or this war sucks us in for too long, then the MAGA agenda is done.
And if the MAGA agenda is done and the Democrats take over once again, then what was the point of all of this?
So all of this has to be taken into account.
And that's why I don't just look at the headlines, Chase.
I don't just look at successful bombings of nuclear sites.
I don't look at I look at the big picture, just like you do, and I know the American people are, and we need to make sure our policymakers are very cognizant of all of the consequences that could potentially happen over the next weeks.
chase geiser
If you were sitting next to President Trump in the Oval Office now, what would you advise that he do?
unidentified
I would advise that he immediately gets people like FBI Director Patel, CIA Director Ratcliffe, DNI, Gabbard.
Put them all in the room to have a threat assessment of exactly what is going on here in the United States.
Because right now, I think the most pressing issue is about the sleeper cells.
I think right now, of course, you have people like Homan and funds that are being appropriated to build this wall.
But we have to deal with the hundreds of thousands of people here.
We have to deal with the military Chinese guys, the Iranians, the Hezbollah figures, the cartels that are just waiting to be activated.
And we also have to really, and this is something I was talking about earlier on TV, we have to look at the financing of some of these leftist groups, these Antifa people, these pro-Hamas groups, which seem to be taking resources and distracting our federal agents, ICE, the FBI, and local law enforcement, from actually placing the resources where they belong, and that is on these people that are right now here in this country.
So focus on the domestic front and what I would do internationally.
I would get people like Putin, Xi Jinping, Macron in the European Union, and Ben Salman and Erdogan of Turkey to meet in a neutral city, whether it's somewhere in Switzerland, whether it's in Istanbul, bring the Iranians at a roundtable with these actors, these global players that all have a vested interest in the Middle East and in Iran, and assuring that the flow of oil maintains free and that we don't start World War III.
And come to an agreement.
Make these countries, force them to an agreement, and prevent the United States from getting further involved in this.
So you have to focus domestically, but you also now have to prioritize international diplomacy.
And the way you're going to do that is by putting all of these stakeholders in the same room with the Iranians, not just President Trump.
chase geiser
George, where can people find you, follow you, and support you?
unidentified
Thanks a lot, Chase.
You can find me primarily on X. That's the platform I'm on.
It's at GeorgePapa19.
I have a book out.
It came out a couple years ago, but I think it's a very timely, deep-state target, how I got caught in the crosshairs of the plot to bring down President Trump.
So thank you very much for that.
chase geiser
Well, it's been an honor and a pleasure to have you.
Thank you for sharing your expertise with me and this audience.
I hope to see you again soon, and I'll be staying in touch with you.
All right, folks, we're coming up on a break here.
In about three minutes.
And I've barely plugged tonight because typically speaking, I try to cover the news and do analysis instead of plugging.
Our goal is to reach a level of success and sustainability that allows us to just totally diverge away from even needing to plug.
But we're at such an existential place, not just as Infowars, but as a species where we're seeing constant escalations.
All over the world, whether it's between Russia and the United States, Iran and Israel, China and the United States, China and Taiwan.
I mean, there are like 800 different ways that World War III could break out, and World War III almost certainly resulting in the death of billions of people, if not literally everyone who walks on the face of creation.
And the only thing that's ever saved humanity, man, does not live on bread alone, but on every word from God.
On the word of God, the only thing that has kept man alive for as long as mankind has been alive, has been the truth, the way, the light.
And that's what Infowars fights for.
We fight to tell the truth, even when it's unpopular, even when it's uncomfortable.
I mean, God knows Alex Jones has every incentive to be as gracious and kind to Donald Trump as possible.
After all, we've been in lawsuit after lawsuit.
Under attack after attack, his family, himself, his businesses, our crew, our hosts.
And now finally we've reached a place where we have Donald Trump as President of the United States again.
I think he's doing, overall, a good job.
But we've entered dangerous waters.
And now that President Trump is the President of the United States, it would be very easy for us at Infowars to just kiss his ass.
All the time with everything that he does because we want the Department of Justice to see the injustice that we've experienced and do something about it.
To protect freedom of speech.
After all, we've been on the front lines of the information war and we have taken the brunt of the blows.
But we're so committed to the truth that even when it's an existential threat for us, we tell it.
When we have legitimate criticisms, we say it.
When we're concerned about World War III and bombing Iran, we say it and we tell the truth.
And whether you agree with us or not, it doesn't matter.
As long as you understand that our heart is dedicated and committed to the truth, just as you, the listener.
And in that commitment, with that spirit of commitment to the truth and freedom of speech and the salvation of humanity, Please go to thealexjonesstore.com.
It is your last chance to get two bottles of methylene blue.
You can get either the capsules or the liquid form of it.
They're both absolutely outstanding.
If you get those two bottles, you will get a bottle of Shilajit gummies for free.
Now, before we launched methylene blue, Shilajit capsules were our best-selling product.
We came out with Shilajit gummies kind of at the same time that we came out with methylene blue, and so it got swept under the rug.
Nobody ever noticed.
It's the most delicious gummy I've ever tasted.
Not only is it incredible for your vitality, but it keeps us on the air.
So please go to thealexjonesstore.com.
Be the reason Alex Jones will always be on the air.
Stay with us for more news and analysis on the other side of this short break.
unidentified
Is the United States now at war with Iran?
jd vance
No, Kristen, we're not at war with Iran.
We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.
And let me just say, Kristen, that we're incredibly grateful and proud of the American Air Force pilots who did an incredible job last night.
The operation was really extraordinary.
These guys flew from Missouri.
They didn't land a single time.
They dropped 30,000-pound bombs on a target the size of a washing machine and then got back home safely without ever landing in the middle.
East or ever stopping other than to briefly refuel.
And of course, they did that in the air.
So it's really an incredible operation, a testament to the power of American military.
And I think it shows what can happen when you have that great American military in the hands of capable presidential leadership.
What we did is we destroyed the Iranian nuclear program.
I think we set that program back substantially.
And we did it without endangering the lives of the American pilots.
That's an incredible thing.
And I think we all should be proud.
Whatever our politics, we should be proud of.
What these guys accomplished.
very, very high impact mission under a lot of pressure.
unidentified
Tonight, Sunday Night Live unveils the hidden truth behind today's headlines with your host, Chase Geiser.
The New York Times Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to Sunday Night Live.
chase geiser
I am Chase Geiser, your host for the next 23 minutes and zero seconds.
Great conversation before this most recent break with George Papadopoulos.
Look, I trust Trump, I believe in Trump, and I love Trump, but I don't want another war in the Middle East for whatever reason.
I don't believe that the reasons we're being given are the accurate reasons.
I think it has much more to do with our trade war with China.
And that that trade war is because our dollar is a lie, our currency is a lie.
I like to see us fix the existing economic system that we have in place, but the challenge with that is that all the world's supervillains and power broker establishment are built upon this foundation, so they have every incentive to prevent anyone from swooping in and changing it and fixing it.
It's such a difficult problem that everyone tries to solve every other problem.
But if you don't cure the cancer fundamentally, as a matter how long you attempt to treat the symptoms, eventually it's going to spread and it's going to kill you.
The fact of the matter is, we have Democratic presidents and we have Republican presidents.
We have America first presidents.
And we have America last presidents.
But our foreign policy is continuously.
So we've gotten to this place where not only has our money caused us to act as a supervillain throughout the entire world for many years, but it's sacrificed the very soul of our nation, the very fabric of our nation in every way you can possibly imagine.
Culturally, spiritually, family values.
It's all gone.
Because we built a house on sand.
I want to show you this clip of Tucker Carlson talking about how this is not a democracy, in clip number 49, if we have the same foreign policy every time.
Let's watch.
tucker carlson
I feel like an idiot for being shocked because of course it's not a democracy.
Of course the system is rigged.
It's fake.
Because no matter who gets elected, you get the same foreign policy, you get the same economic policy, and the Epstein videos remain secret.
So, like, that just shows you that our system has no effect on the actual system.
shawn ryan
Wait, what are you talking about?
I thought we could all sleep well at night now knowing that Epstein legitimately What's going on with that?
I mean, how do you charge a guy with trafficking when there are no end users that have been charged?
Who did he traffic to?
tucker carlson
I don't know.
You got me on that one.
shawn ryan
I mean, right?
How do you charge him with that?
If that's where the trail starts, where does it end?
I think there's just a lot more going on than the majority of people know about.
tucker carlson
What do you think that was?
shawn ryan
What do I think it was?
I think it was a blackmail operation.
tucker carlson
I think it was a blackmail operation run by the CIA and the Israeli intel services and probably others.
You know, French intelligence always has a hand in everything, I've noticed, so probably them too.
The usual, you know, darkest forces in the world colluding to make rich and powerful I don't understand why nobody has come out on it.
shawn ryan
Nobody has come out on it, right?
I mean, because if you paint the scenario, you get on a jet, maybe you're totally innocent.
You don't know what's going on.
Two hot women come out of the whatever stewardess place, come out, and one thing leads to another.
tucker carlson
Yes.
shawn ryan
And then what happens?
They go, oh, we got you.
You're on camera and by the way, these girls are 15 or 16 or whatever the hell they were, right?
I don't know.
tucker carlson
I mean, there's also, it's not just blackmail that makes people obey.
It's not just bribery.
It's also the threat of...
shawn ryan
Do you know anybody that's been threatened with...
tucker carlson
I think every U.S. president has been threatened with...
implicitly because of John F. Kennedy...
I think every one of them understands that, you know, it's pretty obvious what happened there.
And no one has, to this day, released all the files.
And, like, why is that?
Because the message is really clear.
You know, if you get too far outside the boundaries, like, you could wind up like JFK.
shawn ryan
Who places the boundaries?
tucker carlson
Probably the same forces.
sitting president in 1963.
If you listen to the tape of Richard Nixon talking to the CIA director in the Oval Office, when he brings up Kennedy's In fact, not only is he the president, he's won by the biggest landslide in American history.
He has a real mandate.
And he is afraid.
He's afraid even to talk in private to the CIA director about what that was.
And he indicates, like, I know what happened to Jack Kennedy.
And the CIA director doesn't even respond.
And the president doesn't have the balls to say, hey, son, I'm talking to you.
You work for me.
Like, I want the files on this.
Like, I knew Jack Kennedy.
He was in the head next to his wife in public, like a man.
I want to know what happened here.
He does not have the balls to say that to his own CIA director.
Oh man.
That's the level of fear that a Everyone really, a lot of people understand.
Like, that's the fear that that inculcates.
chase geiser
Well, there you have it, folks.
How can we say that this is a democracy?
And technically it's not.
It's a constitutional republic with some...
But how can we say that it's democracy when we always have the same foreign policy?
And why is it that we always have the same foreign policy?
Well, some say it's because Mossad has blackmailed our political class.
And it's probably true.
The question then is, well, who did they blackmail us on behalf of?
Did they do it on behalf of Israel or behalf of the CIA?
Is Israel really a sovereign nation?
After all, it's completely dependent on the United States of America for its defense.
Hundreds of billions of dollars have been given to it over the course of the last several decades.
So since it's so dependent on us, I guess that makes us boss.
And if we're boss and Masada's doing this to our political class, then are we the ones that ordered it?
Is it our CIA trying to get leverage on our political class because it understands that if it leverages our political class, it could ensure that it gets the support of those elected to represent the people?
For what it deems to be highly sensitive information, highly sensitive operations, highly sensitive national security priorities.
And so because we've established and catalyzed and manifested this fourth unchecked branch of government that is the national security apparatus, including the CIA and other intelligence institutions, we have effectively eliminated the representation of the people.
By our political leaders, those elected leaders.
It's why we see so many people change their tune as soon as they're elected.
Not because they were being dishonest when they ran, but because when they get in, they're either blackmailed or they're given deceptive information from institutions that they naively trust because in the name of patriotism, how could the CIA possibly lie about things like whether 9-11 was an inside job, whether COVID-19 was spread intentionally, whether October 7th was allowed to happen.
Whether Gulf of Tonkin was fake, whether the USS Liberty was actually attacked by our greatest ally in the region.
And so effectively speaking, we have this national security apparatus who has stolen our representation from us, ensured that our politicians have more of an incentive to represent the interests of the national security apparatus than the incentives of their own constituents.
And in return for that, in order to ensure that these leaders are not going to be able to do that, we have to do that.
The intelligence apparatus has ensured and guaranteed that it will support, through its private political press proxies, their various re-election campaigns, which is why the Lindsey Grahams and the Mitch McConnells And the Blumenthal's and others get elected time and time and time again, despite the fact that they've sold out the interests of the American people repeatedly, over and over and over again.
And you can run your cute little campaigns against these establishment neoconservatives, but you have this whole system and its momentum against you.
This is why the intelligence community came down so hard on Infowars, spying on us through the FBI since December 10th of 2013 under a type 3 assessment, conspiring against us to ensure that when they couldn't find us guilty of anything criminally, that they could sue us into oblivion civilly by supporting and sponsoring this lawfare against us.
And then, of course, the federal government funding directly those responsible for the lawsuits against us through various grants and government initiatives.
But it wasn't just us that they went after.
It was you.
Because we saw from the Twitter files and from the confessions of Mark Zuckerberg on Joe Rogan's podcast that the intelligence community has had an active hand in all of the major tech corporations, from Palantir to Google to X to Instagram to Facebook, you name it.
If it's a big social media platform, formerly famous for allowing people to express themselves to millions of people, well, then it's been under the influence of the intelligence community for many years now.
Then, of course, the Supreme Court comes out and says, it's okay, it's acceptable for the White House to pressure these institutions to censor or remove accounts identified as politically dangerous, misinformation, disinformation, or simply political dissidence.
Because, after all, the White House has a right to express itself, I suppose, more than the people of the United States of America.
And since mainstream media is totally collapsing, which has caused a massive reduction, In the power of Project Mockingbird, that famous program where the intelligence community infiltrated all the mainstream media outlets many years ago and still does today, since no one actually watches CNN unless they're making fun of it or it's going viral because of how ludicrous it is, they've had to resort to this censorship, which is why they've tried to shut us down and why they're coming after you.
You see, the truth is the greatest threat to a lie, and the lie is everything that our power infrastructure has been based off of, whether it's the lies of our money or the lies of our motives.
And now we're doing things like bombing another nation in the Middle East for some obscure national security interest without a single American voice really being heard in the halls of power.
We hear echoes of the CIA and echoes of the FBI, echoes of Mossad and AIPAC and lobbyists, echoes of the CCP and echoes of the military-industrial complex, but we seldom hear in the institutions our halls of power echoes of the will of the American people.
The only echo that ran its way through those halls was when we elected President Trump to be the President of the United States.
And started a war against those institutions, this political industrial complex, which has been sabotaging and exploiting the American people for many years.
And I believe he's a good man, and I believe when he survived his assassination attempt, President Trump, that it was divine providence.
And I believe that he's totally shifted to a new frame of mind where he considers God.
But I don't believe for a minute that we're getting involved in Iran because we don't want a radical regime to have nuclear power.
After all, Pakistan has nuclear weapons and North Korea has nuclear weapons and Russia has nuclear weapons and China has nuclear weapons.
Hell, the United Kingdom is a nuclear power and it's run by radical extremist Muslims too.
In fact, it's probably going to be the first major nation.
In Europe to use a nuclear weapon on behalf of radical Islamic extremist interests.
And we see that not only has the United States allowed the erosion of its own national security by allowing tens of millions of people to come in illegally, hundreds of thousands of them from terrorist countries, tens of thousands of them at least terrorists themselves.
But we've allowed the entire West to be eroded by this globalist, satanic energy.
It's like the nothing from a never-ending story.
It's ineffable.
It's not tangible.
You can't see it or smell it or taste it.
You just feel it intuitively in your soul, picking it up like some x-ray or magnetic sensor.
Because you can't say anything about it, it's so ineffable, and because you can't see it, taste it, smell it, or test for it, or create hypotheses based off of it and predict anything with it, you can't convince anyone else unless they are in tune intuitively with their soul and are picking up on the same disturbance in the forest, for lack of a better term.
So now we've arrived at a position where the military-industrial complex, the political-industrial complex, has no accountability to the people of the United States of America whatsoever.
And everyone is deeply aware that something is terribly wrong, but nobody can quite point their finger at what it is, which makes us incredibly vulnerable, incredibly malleable by the powers that be.
You see, now, since we know something's deeply wrong, but we can't really describe it or name it, We have all the most powerful institutions that have ever existed taking advantage of this vulnerability and fighting in the information war to mold our people into a direction that will ultimately lead to our total annihilation, our total destruction, our total subjugation, our total eradication.
To the point where if they succeed, people will wonder one day, many years from now, hundreds of years from now, whether or not the United States of America even really existed in the same way that they wonder today whether or not Atlantis really existed.
This is why we fight the information war, because we don't want America to just be remembered.
We want America to thrive.
And yes, there are breaking reports by the New York Times that intelligence officials have detected signs that Iran-backed militias are preparing to attack U.S. bases in Iraq and possibly Syria.
They'll probably do so.
Those attacks will probably be superficial.
The real concern, and everybody's talking about it, are the sleeper cells in the United States that could attack us.
Because we know that terrorist attacks are a great way for the military-industrial complex to get us involved in a war overseas.
A war which would, yes, secure our national interests by protecting the dollar and also secure our national security institutions'interests by justifying the expansion of their power and surveillance and artificial intelligence and the eradication of our rights.
Just like what we saw with the Patriot Act, which...
Though it expired, none of its practices have been terminated.
And the tragedy is that so many Americans won't realize when this attack comes here in the United States of America, mosques being blown up, excuse me, not mosques, temples likely being blown up, Christian churches being attacked, planes going down, surface-to-air missiles, malls being shot up, schools being attacked.
When these things begin to happen over the course of the next several weeks or several months, so many people won't realize that it wasn't a failure of our national security apparatus that allowed these attacks to happen, but it was the success of the United States.
And so they put us in a position where they knew the soldiers were in the Trojan horse, and they allowed it in any way.
It wasn't a surprise when they came out and attacked and burned the city and shot Achilles.
In fact, they want these attacks to take place.
Because that's how they're going to get us involved in this war in Iran, which is really about saving the dollar and the bankers and the corporations who have agreed to play ball with the deep state establishment.
Now, I believe Trump knows this and Trump understands this.
And he also knows that he can't alienate himself and his policies from those policies of the neoconservatives because, after all, they're too powerful.
And so is the CIA and the establishment infrastructure that exists now.
There's a reason that he signed an executive order to release the Epstein files, but we haven't heard much from him about those files, despite the fact that everyone in America is frustrated with their lack of revelation.
He understands not to attack a stronger enemy head on.
He understands that the dollar is at risk.
It's why he signed executive orders to make illegal central bank digital currencies.
It's why he imposed tariffs on China.
And it's why he's not attacking the neoconservatives directly, because he understands that we need stability in the Middle East in order to compete with China for the global reserve status of our currency.
Because it's the end of America if China gets global reserve status.
Or the globalists get global reserve status in one way or another.
But the shame of it is that we as a civilization have sinned so much that good people have to do bad things.
That innocent people have to die.
In order to keep whatever is left of the spark that was America burning bright enough or with enough heat that maybe one day it could catch again.
The problem is you can't fix these kinds of problems from within these broken systems.
You have to transcend the system itself.
You can't fix an engine of a car from within the cabin.
You have to work from the outside on the inside.
You have to transcend the car itself.
Just like we as human beings are incapable of correcting our imperfection as a result of the fall of mankind, as we read about in the story of the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve and the fall of man from the eating of the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge.
We from within could not solve that problem or rectify it, so God himself had to have a son and send him down as a human being to live a life without sin.
Essentially eradicating the condemnation, the punishment that we were all sentenced to as a result of this fall.
Whether you believe it literally happened or metaphorically, it's still capital T true.
So just as there had to be some transcendent divine intervention to fix humanity as a creation of God, so there must be some transcendent approach to these problems.
We're not going to fix the FBI by having a Kash Patel or a Dan Ben-Geno, as good intention as they may or may not be.
We're not going to fix the executive branch by having an outstanding president of the United States.
And we're not going to fix the intelligence community by having a great director of national intelligence.
We're not going to fix the health problems in the United States of America by having a great secretary of health.
You see, because all of our leaders believe, because of some naive faith in these institutions, that they can work within them to reverse or rectify the sins of them.
But they are so rotten.
The foundation is so cracked that a new one needs to be completely built, and we have yet to see someone with not only the will or the audacity or the potential, But the competence to understand what must be done, and I am not someone who understands what it is that we need to do to solve these problems.
They are so deeply rooted, and we've never seen a civilization throughout history that has reached the level of corruption that the United States of America has reached, that has successfully reversed that corruption without bloodshed, without revolution.
I don't want civil war.
I don't want revolution.
I advocate for us to do anything by any means to prevent that from happening, but one thing I do know for sure is that if we don't fix, The very nature of our monetary policy, whether it's the national debt, whether it's the dollar itself,
and how it's backed, and how it operates, we will descend into further and further madness until we wind up like Nietzsche, rocking back and forth as a silent madman who famously said, what doesn't kill you makes you stronger, and then died a slow death.
Of insanity and depravity for many years.
So in the name of a sane America, in the name of a living, thriving, and prospering existing America, in the name of saving the human race from destroying itself in some radiated, maniacal suicide, please go to thealexjonesstore.com.
And it's almost poetic, the products that we sell, because yes, they are the best.
Yes, it is the best price for the highest quality.
Yes, they are third-party tested.
Yes, they are effective.
It's almost poetic, because as we advocate for humanity, what we sell to you is that which makes you, or allows you to make yourself a better version of yourself.
Whether it's getting the methylene blue, which helps you with focus and energy and mental clarity, or ultimate life force, which makes your body healthier, Ways I don't have the time to explain to you, whether it's the shilajit that gives you incredible vitality or the ultimate burn, which ensures that your metabolism is optimal, or the optimal human, which is everything the body needs.
You see, we're fighting for your mind, your body, and your soul, not just with the products that we sell, but with the message of this network.
And sometimes we get it wrong, but never on purpose, and we never lie.
And if we are to transcend...
We have to have freedom of speech.
We have to have our rights because, folks, we're about ready to go into an artificial intelligence war, into a space war, the likes of which humanity couldn't even dream of, even in science fiction.
So please go to thealexjonesstore.com right now, not just for your mind and your body, but for your species.
Keep Alex Jones on the air and stay with us.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Infowars.com forward slash show.
alex jones
I am cutting this announcement on Monday, June 16th, 2025.
You have seven days until next Sunday evening at midnight to take advantage of this first of its type sale at thealexjonesstore.com.
Now we have our all-time best-selling product, ultramethylene blue, USP medical grade.
That does such incredible things for your whole body, your energy, your health.
You've seen, you've heard, you've read the amazing reviews.
99% of people within 30 months from now are filled with incredible energy, no letdown.
But what it does long-term, Now, we have the original liquid that is very strong and very powerful, and it's just as strong as powerful.
It's the same liquid, but encapsulated now, so you can travel with it, share it with others, and there's not a danger of abstaining things.
Supercharged with high-quality vitamin C that studies show get it into the cells even better.
You can get both of these now with a free bottle of one of our other best-selling products, Shilajit.
Previously for a week, we had where you could get two bottles already discounted of the ultramethylene blue of vitamin C and get a free bottle of Irish sea moss.
That was very popular.
Then a few weeks before that, we had it where you could get one bottle of ultramethylene blue liquid and get another bottle free.
Well, we are now bringing you two new sales.
You can get the capsules already discounted with a free bottle of our best-selling Shilogy I'll tell you about in a moment.
And or you can get two bottles already discounted of the liquid methylene blue and get the bottle of Chilogy as well.
That is an amazing sale and there's more.
You can get giant discounts when you subscribe.
That way they hold it back.
It never sells out.
You cancel any time.
Then it locks in an even lower sales price for you at thealexshonestore.com.
Now, let's talk about Chilogy.
Chilogy is amazing.
Scientists don't even know how it forms.
It's millions and millions of years old.
It's in the Himalayas and a few other mountains.
And when there's a big earthquake or something, the villagers for thousands of years, the Tibetans know to go get it because it makes them healthy, makes them feel great.
Those are these amazing things.
Now, not all Shilajit deposits are the same.
Ours comes from one of the best known deposits in the world.
And scientists have now been able to study it more and basically has a whole bunch of natural peptides that are, and peptides are all the rage, as you know.
That naturally occur only in it and just do so much, like boosting testosterone naturally.
And the list goes on and on and on.
So, you really want to try Shilogy.
You want to experience it.
These products really work.
If you'll just go try the products, I know many of you have never actually gone and gotten any at TheOccionalScore.com.
I know you're going to be extremely impressed.
For those of you that already know how good Shilogy is, already know how great the Bethlehem Blue is.
Now you can get a free bottle of Shilogy with it as well.
And Shilogy is one of our top-selling products.
We've got the best, hands down.
And the funds you spend with us allow us to stay on the air.
So I want to thank you all for your support.
I want to encourage you to become subscribers, even better deals.
And I want to encourage all of you to become VIP members, to commit to the broadcast.
You can cancel any time, but that way, each month you get $40 to spend in the store, special discounts, special sales, special offers.
And you can cancel any time, as I said.
But for $30, you get $40 to spend in the store.
That's an amazing deal.
So anybody that's going to support us in what we're doing needs to be a VIP.
And I thank those of you that have been VIPs.
I want to encourage those that aren't to go to the store and do it today.
We also have a giant selection of the very best ball caps, t-shirts, and more.
Patriot apparel.
It's a real adventure to wear it.
So thank you so much for keeping us on the air.
Take advantage of this sale.
You have seven days to do it.
Do yourself a favor.
Investigate Shilogy.
Export Selection