Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| Welcome to Sunday Night Live, coming to you live from the InfoWars studios here in Austin, Texas. | ||
| I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Very happy to be with you here. | ||
| This Sunday evening. | ||
| I, of course, normally host the American Journal each and every weekday morning 8 to 11 a.m. | ||
| Central Standard Time at Infowars.com forward slash show and band dot video. | ||
| But I'm always happy to come in on it on a Sunday evening and go over some of this stuff. | ||
| Fewer commercial breaks, more time for me to ramble. | ||
| And isn't that what we all isn't that what we all want? | ||
| There's a lot of news to get to today. | ||
| We've got news. | ||
| Out of Ukraine, we've got news about a racially motivated killing that the mainstream media is very concerned about. | ||
| We have other stories about the unintended side effects, you might call it, of the climate change agenda. | ||
| And all sorts of wonderful videos to show you as well. | ||
| We'll be taking your calls throughout the second hour. | ||
| But I wanted to start today. | ||
| Every time I host the Sunday Show, I sort of think, you know, maybe I'll just do a, maybe I'll do a wrap-up. | ||
| I'll do a week in review kind of thing. | ||
| Because stories fly by so quickly these days. | ||
| I mean, this week alone, you had obviously the debate, Trump being back on Twitter, Trump being arraigned and arrested and indicted. | ||
| Just massive, horrifying story. | ||
| How it relates to the future of our existence as a republic. | ||
| And you had the DSA in Europe, that's the Digital Services Act, which is a free speech destroying piece of legislation from a largely unelected supranational organization, the European Union. | ||
| And just tons of other stories where it's just every week, I mean, things are happening so quickly now. | ||
| The info war is at such a fever pitch. | ||
| That's good every once in a while. | ||
| take a little look back. | ||
| And as I was looking through the stories over the last week, one trend popped out at me more than anything else, and that is the destruction of free speech. | ||
| And it's pretty obvious why, because the plans that the globalists have for all of us relies on silence, relies on complicity, relies on their ability to spread falsehoods and not have those falsehoods counteracted with the truth in any meaningful way. | ||
| And of course, it is central to what we do here at InfoWars after all. | ||
| My whole existence, but especially since working in Infowars, it's been like, you know, I can say whatever. | ||
| Obviously, I can say whatever I want. | ||
| They're never going to come for me. | ||
| Why would they come? | ||
| I've never done anything. | ||
| It's not illegal to say whatever you want, as long as you're not calling for violence or something equivalent. | ||
| So, you know, let them do whatever they're going to do. | ||
| I'm good. | ||
| We've got the First Amendment, which we do, you know, for now. | ||
| For now. | ||
| It's going away, and it's being attacked, as so many of our freedoms are, in a multi-front, well-coordinated, well-orchestrated assault that's coming from academia, it's coming from corporations, it's coming from NGOs and pressure groups, so-called charities, who exist entirely to manufacture and then guide political action. | ||
| It's coming from the government itself, of course. | ||
| It's coming from the How would you put it? | ||
| Neo-governmental, the supranational governmental organizations like the UN and the EU. | ||
| So you can just picture all of these various forces all rushing headlong at their central enemy, which is the First Amendment, as we in America are the only country that has a guaranteed right to free speech embedded in our founding documents, in our constitution. | ||
| Even the countries that sort of paved the way for America, the UK, I mean, they have some of the most extreme anti-free speech laws on the books right now. | ||
| So America is the final frontier in that regard. | ||
| It is the ultimate goal of the globalists to destroy our ability to speak freely. | ||
| And once they do that, it's smooth sailing, isn't it? | ||
| I mean, once they can act with total impunity, once they can Fabricate reality wholesale and not even be contradicted. | ||
| That's sort of game over, isn't it? | ||
| When they have total control of the messaging and the communication and the information, what are you going to do? | ||
| What's anybody going to do? | ||
| Obviously, the Second Amendment is crucial in this aspect as well. | ||
| But the First Amendment is obviously the priority. | ||
| And there have been a lot of stories this week alone Showing just how monumental the challenge ahead of us is. | ||
| As all of these various organizations, all of these various levels of control conspire with one another to destroy our ability to speak freely, either through law or through social pressure, manipulation, and control of the money supply. | ||
| So we'll start off with this. | ||
| This whole stack I have here is all free speech stuff. | ||
| Most of it from this week alone. | ||
| And of course, if you really want to get right down to it, I mean, all of the big stories from this week sort of go back to free speech, right? | ||
| When you've got the President of the United States being charged with conspiracy and some of the conspiratorial evidence, you know, evidence that he was in a conspiracy or things like him tweeting out, hey, go watch this news channel. | ||
| It really all goes back to free speech. | ||
| at the end of the day and that is what they're trying to destroy again if they can't just stop you from saying it and maybe they'll come up with some other reason why they cannot take you out it kind of just on on a total aside here we had a video sort of go viral on tick tock uh It was an interview I was doing with Chris Sky and I was talking about 300 and just saying that the dynamic between men and women mean basically women need to back up men. | ||
| They need to not tear down their men but actually be a support and men need to moderate their own actions. | ||
| Based on what good women are helping them figure out. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Anyway, it's not really that important, but it did go viral. | ||
| It got over 2 million views. | ||
| I think over 3 million views. | ||
| I don't know at this point because it was removed, but first it was covered up. | ||
| First, they put a blur on it and you had to say, yes, I understand because it was, I think what they said was sensitive information of some sort. | ||
| No, violence. | ||
| Yeah, they said it was violence. | ||
| They said it was sensitive content. | ||
| It was violent because it showed a clip from 300. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Hollywood movie. | ||
| That's fine. | ||
| I mean, it's not fine. | ||
| It's insane. | ||
| It's wrong, and that's the point I'm making here. | ||
| First, they called it sensitive content because it had violence, and they put a thing in front of it. | ||
| I appealed it. | ||
| They said, yeah, you're right. | ||
| It's not really encouraging violent behavior. | ||
| It's not violent. | ||
| You know, it's not like a street fight that I'm just putting up to exalt the people committing the violence. | ||
| So they took it down, and then within like an hour, it wasn't just covered up, it was completely removed, this time for spreading hate speech. | ||
| Now, of course, the clip was not violent. | ||
| It obviously wasn't hate speech. | ||
| It's literally impossible to try to figure out how this clip could have possibly been hate speech. | ||
| It's me and Chris Sky, you know, talking about the relationship between men and women, and me saying, they need each other, you know? | ||
| He looks back, and before he does the crazy thing, she gives him the little nod. | ||
| You know, how different would the movie be if she had, you know, shook her head side to side? | ||
| No, don't do that thing. | ||
| Don't be the man that you are, the man I married. | ||
| Be something else. | ||
| Be weaker. | ||
| Be a cuck. | ||
| Yeah, it would have been a different story. | ||
| No hate speech possible. | ||
| So, right, the point that I'm making is that It doesn't matter. | ||
| It doesn't matter what label they put on it. | ||
| It doesn't matter what excuse they come up with. | ||
| They just want it gone. | ||
| Whether it's because it was from me, and it was from Infowars, and they just didn't want something we did going viral. | ||
| Whether it was because they just... I mean, I don't know. | ||
| I don't know what their real reason was, but it obviously wasn't because it was violent, and it obviously wasn't hate speech. | ||
| But it doesn't matter. | ||
| They wanted it taken down, and they're just shuffling through all of the excuses that they have at their disposal to find one that vaguely, maybe, kind of fits on it, and they apply that. | ||
| So it's the same thing that's happening here with free speech. | ||
| If they want you to shut up, yeah, maybe they'll say it's because you were, I don't know, like, causing a coup. | ||
| Maybe they'll say you were endorsing violence. | ||
| Maybe they'll say that you were interfering with an election. | ||
| It doesn't matter. | ||
| They just want you to shut up. | ||
| The real reason is because what you're saying is damaging to their plan. | ||
| Now you don't get kicked off of social media for telling lies. | ||
| You get kicked off for telling the truth. | ||
| So again, just this is the way it works and whether it's big tech or the legal system, they both sort of operate in a similar fashion in that if they want you to shut up, if they want to send you to jail for your speech, they got to find some excuse to do it. | ||
| And that's all that's happening here and whether it's You know, saying that Donald Trump told people to watch something on the news. | ||
| That's apparently conspiracy to overthrow an election. | ||
| I mean, it's absurd. | ||
| But they don't care that it's absurd. | ||
| And once they completely eliminate free speech and have a total grasp on your ability to speak freely in this country or anywhere on the internet, then they aren't even going to have to come up with the excuse. | ||
| At least now they have to pretend like what they're doing has some sort of valid reason But they're working rapidly towards creating a situation where that is not even necessary. | ||
| So to start this, again, most of these stories are from this week, but we're going to start with one that's a bit of a flashback. | ||
| It was a post made yesterday by Martyr Made. | ||
| He says this. | ||
| to his mere 58,000 followers. | ||
| Meanwhile, during the same election, tech mogul Reid Hoffman, and keep that name in mind, by the way, he'll make an appearance a little bit later. | ||
| In this stack of news, he spent hundreds of millions of dollars to help Democrats in 2016 and 2020, was caught funding a group that used phone calls, texts, and emails to knowingly spread false information that a Republican Senate candidate was connected to the Russians, Hoffman, whom Artur made notes is fat, is as free as ever, and is still Democratic Party royalty. | ||
| Mackey is in prison because prominent Democrats learned his name, and Hoffman is free for the exact same reason. | ||
| In case you don't remember or haven't heard of this, Douglas Mackey, a.k.a. | ||
| Ricky Vaughn, was sentenced and I believe is in prison for like 10 years or something. | ||
| I mean, a very, very long time for putting out a meme that was like, text your vote in. | ||
| Hey, Democrats, text your vote to this number and you don't have to go in that day. | ||
| An obvious meme, an obvious joke, not even, I don't believe, really intended for Like, Democratic people. | ||
| It was intended to make right-wing people laugh by suggesting that this was the case. | ||
| And also, you can find dozens of Democrats who put out the exact same meme, only targeting Republicans rather than Democrats. | ||
| They don't get targeted. | ||
| Ricky Vaughn does. | ||
| I mean, it's not one of those things, it's like, well, they broke the law and he broke the law, so why aren't they both? | ||
| No, no, he didn't break the law, and neither did they, but he is being punished for this. | ||
| So just a reminder that this isn't speculation. | ||
| It's not like, oh my gosh, the First Amendment will go away in 10 years. | ||
| They're charging people for memes right now. | ||
| They're getting convictions for people posting silly memes right now by calling it election disinformation. | ||
| And that's going to be one of the keywords that they use to justify their destruction of the First Amendment or destruction of free speech, I should say, since it's happening not just here, but around the world. | ||
| From Infowars.com published today, more people are realizing the UN's cybercrime treaty is an excuse for global surveillance. | ||
| Human rights activists have taken a stance against the United Nations proposed cybercrime treaty, which they fear may metamorphosize into a global digital surveillance alliance jeopardizing data privacy and human rights. | ||
| The treaty, currently under debate amongst delegates in New York City, has been mired in controversy due to concerns about increased ubiquity of cross-border surveillance and imposition of restrictions on free online speech. | ||
| The treaty, originally proposed by Russia and supported by nations such as North Korea, Iran, and China, is suspected to lay the groundwork for legalizing cross-border surveillance and turning online free speech into a criminal act. | ||
| The draft was subjected to six rounds of negotiations which commenced on Monday at the U.N. | ||
| headquarters. | ||
| Now this again, as I pointed out, we're seeing threats to free speech come from just about every direction in a coordinated, designed, organized fashion. | ||
| The proposal is set to provide broad powers to governments, enabling the pursuit of activists, journalists, and marginalized communities. | ||
| The routinely targeted groups and autocratic regimes' efforts to curtail free speech and privacy, said Catiza Rodriguez, Global Privacy Policy Director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. | ||
| She pointed out that as the treaty stands, it lacks sufficient safeguards allowing governments to invoke invasive surveillance mechanisms such as interception of content and real-time metadata tracking, even for foreign criminal investigations. | ||
| So this is a global problem happening right now. | ||
| And yet I do remind you that the only place on the globe that has free speech embedded in its legal system from the jump is the United States. | ||
| And so we especially have to be concerned about, and we may play some of these videos later, we played a lot of the videos about the DSA on American Journal, and we'll get to that. | ||
| That has to do with Europe. | ||
| Obviously, it's a blueprint for what they want to do here and what they end up doing here through the UN, through something like this cybercrime bill, right? | ||
| Cybercrime, aka speaking out against them. | ||
| But we have to be especially sensitive to the international free speech restrictions because that may be the only way that they can impose them here in America. | ||
| And they do do that sometimes. | ||
| I mean, you see things on Twitter that are like, this violated the law in Germany and has been removed. | ||
| So they'll circumvent, get around, or Do damage to the First Amendment by using international, their primary methods are international organizations like the UN or the EU and big tech companies doing it because they're private companies even though they're run by, instructed by, collaborating with the American spy agencies such as the CIA and FBI. | ||
| Speaking of the international character of this censorship push, Jacinda Ardern set to bring her tyrannical censorship policies to a new gig at Harvard. | ||
| Remember I said academia was in this as well? | ||
| There's a little write-up about an interview done between Avi Yemini and Ezra Levant on Rebel. | ||
| They discussed the former Prime Minister of New Zealand whose government attempted to ban Yemini from entering the country. | ||
| The two discussed the governance of former Kiwi Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, who became internationally reviled during the pandemic for New Zealand's draconian lockdown policies. | ||
| Ardern's government also previously banned Abe from entering the country due to his, quote, propensity to incite and agitate people with opposing views. | ||
| Now, does he go out of his way to incite and agitate people? | ||
| Does he say things that are designed to? | ||
| provoke and agitate and causes people to be violent or do they get violent when confronted with opposing opinions of any character or any you know method of expressing them this is a major issue it's a big problem not just in our country but around the world that you say something and they take the person's reaction to you saying that thing and say you meant to give them that reaction Their reaction is your fault. | ||
| You can't say that anymore. | ||
| Even if what you're saying is absolutely true or your sincerely held belief. | ||
| And that's a direct quote, by the way, from the New Zealand government saying that Avi Yamini, who is not exactly the most provocative guy, I mean, he goes around and does street interviews, but He's not, I wanted to say he's not Alex Jones, but they call him, sorry, let me get the exact quote again. | ||
| They say that he has a propensity to incite and agitate people with opposing views. | ||
| In other words, he has a tendency to express views, and those who oppose those views get violent. | ||
| So he has to shut up now. | ||
| No longer Prime Minister, Ardenne has accepted a position at Harvard University, where she will be working on, quote, online extremism. | ||
| A disturbing development considering how during COVID she explicitly told New Zealanders not to trust any information other than that provided by the government. | ||
| So she now has a position at Harvard talking about online extremism. | ||
| You know, extremism like telling the truth about the lies that she spread to lock down her country against all common sense and medical knowledge. | ||
| Online extremism. | ||
| That's exactly what America needs. | ||
| The best and brightest going to Harvard need to be told by some failed New Zealand Prime Minister how dangerous it is for people to contradict the government. | ||
| And that really is all it comes down to. | ||
| It really is absurdly obvious how this works now. | ||
| If The intelligence agencies say it. | ||
| It's spread as unquestionable gospel by the mainstream media. | ||
| If they don't say it, then the media acts like it's a conspiracy theory. | ||
| It's very simple now. | ||
| If it comes from the government, especially the spy agencies, then it is gospel truth, and questioning it is disinformation or misinformation. | ||
| If it comes from anywhere else, Then it's dangerous misinformation and disinformation. | ||
| It has to be silenced. | ||
| It's not that complicated. | ||
| It really is that simple. | ||
| All they're saying is that contradicting the government is dangerous. | ||
| And obviously they have such a track record of success. | ||
| How could you even argue with them? | ||
| Again, the biggest story this week about free speech was the Digital Services Act. | ||
| Reuters says big tech braces for EU Digital Services Act regulations. | ||
| More than a dozen of the world's biggest tech companies face unprecedented legal scrutiny as the European Union's sweeping Digital Services Act imposes new rules on content moderation, user privacy, and transparency. | ||
| From Friday, a host of internet giants including Meta, Facebook, and Instagram Apple's online app store and a handful of Google services will face new obligations in the EU, including preventing harmful content from spreading, banning or limiting certain user-targeting practices, and sharing some internal data with regulators and associated researchers. | ||
| The EU is seen as the global leader in tech regulation, with more wide-ranging pieces of legislation such as the Digital Markets Act and the AI Act on the way. | ||
| The bloc's success in implementing such laws will influence the introduction of similar rules around the world. | ||
| How do you grade success in a rule set like this? | ||
| It succeeds if you actually shut people up, I guess? | ||
| I guess that's how it works? | ||
| For now, the rules only apply to 19 of the largest online platforms, with more than 45 million users in the EU alone. | ||
| From mid-February, however, they will apply to a variety of online platforms, regardless of size. | ||
| So the EU is engaged in what it's there for, silencing the people of Europe, anybody who wants to dissent against the powers that be. | ||
| We can actually go now to clip number four here. | ||
| This is Ireland's media minister saying that, quote, under the DSA, every state will have to designate a body when it comes to misinformation on the internet. | ||
| So through the EU, they're forcing every member state to create an office of their government to make sure that their citizens' language and online presence comports with the dictates of the largely unelected European Union. | ||
| So here is Ireland's media minister talking about the DSA. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Minister, as you know today the EU Digital Services Act came into effect which will attempt to regulate so-called misinformation on social media platforms and your own government's electoral commission will fulfill a similar role nationally. | |
| So is it not dangerous for democracy that powerful state institutions will get to decide what is and isn't true? | ||
| I think this is actually a very important development for Ireland. | ||
| So while the European Commission leads on implementation and enforcement, it provides the Member States of establishment to share responsibility depending on the circumstances of any particular situation. | ||
| I think what we've done with Commission na mBan and setting that up as a regulator will protect Sure, but I'm asking about the misinformation side of it specifically. | ||
| Whatever about child protection, that's a whole separate issue. | ||
| I mean, is it right for government and state institutions to be able to say what is and isn't true? | ||
| We have, when it comes to misinformation, it's actually a point to the whole value of public service broadcasting and why we need reliable information and I think under the DSA you'll see that every state will designate a body to the DSC and we have that person and that was John Evans was appointed as a Digital Services Commissioner in An Comission and I welcome the development But I'm sorry, that's not an answer to the question. | ||
| I'm asking you, do you think it's right and healthy for democracy, for the government and the state to be able to decide what is and isn't true? | ||
| Have you done any assessments, for example, to make sure that these regulations aren't abused or overused? | ||
| I think everything that we see in misinformation, anything that can prevent misinformation is to be welcomed. | ||
| So you haven't done any assessment then to ensure that this is in the news? | ||
| The DSA would lie with Minister Coveney's department, but come assume the man lies with me. | ||
| Minister, just on the Digital Services Act again, is it really good enough that you failed to answer the question earlier about whether or not it's acceptable for the state to regulate information that people are allowed to say and decide what is true or false? | ||
| Should people be encouraged by the fact that the Minister can't answer a simple question when we're literally regulating truth? | ||
| None of this has anything to do with the question I've asked. | ||
| None of this has anything to do with the question I've asked. | ||
| with now, it points to the value of public service broadcasting and the immense valuable role it played. | ||
| None of this has anything to do with the question I've asked. | ||
| You have not. | ||
| I have answered the question. | ||
| Haha. | ||
| No you haven't, lady. | ||
| What are you talking about? | ||
| You completely avoided the question entirely. | ||
| First you tried to claim it was about protecting the children. | ||
| Oh dear, the children. | ||
| Who will protect the children from misinformation? | ||
| It's absurd. | ||
| I mean, obviously she can't answer the question. | ||
| Obviously. | ||
| Everybody with two brain cells to rub together. | ||
| He understands that when you have a government who is the sole proprietor of truth, and is unquestionable, and that your average citizen can be criminally charged for posting things that go contrary to the statements of the government, which by the way, the governments of the world have proven themselves to be wholly untrustworthy, completely incapable of determining truth from lies, or even whether they want to do that is still questionable, as far as I'm concerned. | ||
| But obviously that's the end of democracy. | ||
| Obviously that's it. | ||
| But it's absurd to even use the word democracy in this anyway, regardless of how you feel about it. | ||
| Democracy, that is. | ||
| is operating as a totalitarian state, or as a collection of totalitarian states, maybe I should say. | ||
| Think about all of the things that have happened in Europe in just the last year or so, and how so many measures have come from the EU, or from the World Economic Forum, and then these policies have been enforced by the national governments, that have had absolutely no support from the people, have actually been opposed by the people overwhelmingly. | ||
| The farmers' protest in the Netherlands, where the pro-farmer group came out of nowhere and won a sweeping victory in their parliamentary election, because the people don't want farms being destroyed to make way for multi-family residential housing for all the Africans that the EU are going to bring in. | ||
| They don't want it. | ||
| They want the farms to continue to be farms. | ||
| They want their lifestyles to continue, but that's at odds with what the rulers want, so who do you think wins? | ||
| In that situation, is it the people are the are the rulers desperate to do stuff with the approval of the people? | ||
| Are they doing what the people want? | ||
| No, they're doing things that the people despise and they're doing it anyway because they don't care what you think. | ||
| They think, well, if we can sigh up and into accepting this so much the better. | ||
| But if they continue to oppose us, despite all of our insistence that they have to agree with us, they continue to oppose us. | ||
| Then we'll just do it anyway and criminalize dissent. | ||
| Same thing's happening in Ireland with massive pushback against the immigration plan there where they plan to bring in an equal amount of foreigners as live in the population of Ireland right now. | ||
| you The Irish people don't want it. | ||
| It doesn't matter. | ||
| It's happening anyway. | ||
| The AFD, the Alternative for Deutschland party in Germany, is not only being labeled as a domestic terrorist organization, they're thinking about banning it outright. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because it's too popular. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| It's pulling upwards around 20%, meaning about one-fifth of the German population is in favor of this party. | ||
| And that's what you do in a democracy, right? | ||
| Once something gets popular enough, you ban it. | ||
| That's what's actually happening right now. | ||
| So to even claim that they are operating a democracy at all is completely, completely absurd. | ||
| But if that's what they want to champion, if that's why they say we have to go to World War III to save the democracy of Zelensky, which has canceled all elections until the war ends, right? | ||
| I mean it's so absurd for them to claim that they're protecting democracy and then when they're put a question like, well, how does it help – How does it enforce democracy? | ||
| Is it democratic for the government to have sole monopolistic power of information? | ||
| They just start rambling nonsense that is completely different from the question that was asked because they know what they're doing is diametrically opposed to the supposed virtues that they constantly project on all of us. | ||
| We'll show you more videos on the other side and we'll continue. | ||
| We're only about about a quarter of the way through a stack of what's happened just this week when it comes to free speech here in America and across the world. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| Sunday Night Live Infowars dot com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We're going to continue talking about the attacks on free speech that are coming from all directions, affecting people all over the world. | ||
| But before we do, always remember there's a way to fight back against the encroachment of censorship and that's to support InfoWars as we continue to be The only free speech network on the air. | ||
| I think I'm pretty comfortable saying that. | ||
| The only free speech network, especially of our size and caliber, in existence today on the face of planet Earth. | ||
| Why are we free? | ||
| Because, well, for one thing, we got kicked off all the internet sites, so they can't limit what we say. | ||
| I mean, I've been to some other right-wing organizations. | ||
| They print out lists, update lists, as to what is allowed and not allowed to be talked about on YouTube, because they rely on YouTube for their funding. | ||
| You think that happens at InfoWars? | ||
| You think I'm being delivered a thing that's like, oh, this is brand new, don't say Ivermectin, you can't say Ivermectin anymore. | ||
| That's what other places go through. | ||
| Trust me, it's miserable. | ||
| I feel sorry for them. | ||
| I'm so happy and proud to be on a network that has no free speech restrictions. | ||
| Because nobody can impose them on us and we don't impose them on ourselves. | ||
| It's as simple as that. | ||
| But in addition to that, we also can't be cancelled by the other forces that we're talking about trying to impose censorship. | ||
| Right? | ||
| The corporations. | ||
| Big tech will censor people, but corporations, if they have advertising on your network, that is a guillotine hanging above your neck. | ||
| They get to decide what's too far, what's not far enough when the blade comes chopping down. | ||
| We don't have that. | ||
| We don't have any corporations. | ||
| Holding power over us because we appeal directly to the American people through Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Because you go to Infowarsstore.com, we are able to stay on the air, continue to spread this valuable factual information in opposition to the lies being spread by the mainstream media, the government and all of their confederative cronies. | ||
| And so we ask you, if you want to keep free speech alive, not just as an idea, but in a tangible form with InfoWars.com, Band.Video, all of the great stuff that we do, you've got to go to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We make it so easy for you to do it with the massive discounts on incredible products. | ||
| The Christmas Savings in August sales event is still on with up to 60% off our top selling products. | ||
| By the way, I didn't even print it out today, but more and more stories coming out about the level of Toxins in water. | ||
| It's like nobody could figure this out before Alex Jones and they called him crazy for 20 years. | ||
| We're talking about it now every single time you go on Google News or some other mainstream... | ||
| aggregator they've got stories about pfas in the water as if they're just figuring this out now as if we didn't know about this decades ago so you got to be filtering your water and uh the water filters are on sale most importantly there is a limited time flash sale still going on i doubt this will continue much longer in fact it's probably only still going on because uh alex wasn't in the office today the uh to host the show | ||
| so i imagine that this will be gone maybe later today maybe tomorrow but it's vitamin mineral fusion and survival shield x3 which are really a powerful combo pack both of those are 40 off it is a flash sale it will not last long it is a part of the christmas and august sales event but But whatever you do, go to InfoWarsStore.com and support us in this mission to keep free speech alive. | ||
| As I said, not just as an idea, but as something that we do every single day of our lives. | ||
| InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Go there today, support us. | ||
| We so appreciate that you have and hope that you continue to. | ||
| I hope you ramp it up. | ||
| So let's get back into the DSA, shall we? | ||
| Let's get back into the EU's Digital Service Act that went into effect Two days ago, on August 25th. | ||
| The Verge has this story. | ||
| The EU's Digital Service Act goes into effect today. | ||
| Here's what you need. | ||
| Here's what that means. | ||
| They say it forces companies to rethink their policies on advertising, transparency, and moderation. | ||
| Tech giants like Facebook, Amazon, and Google must now comply with sweeping regulation and legislation that holds online platforms legally accountable for the content posted to them. | ||
| Well, if only that was true. | ||
| If only that was the reality. | ||
| will likely see far-reaching global effects as companies adjust their policies to comply. | ||
| Under the new rules, online platforms must implement ways to prevent and remove posts containing illegal goods, services, or content while simultaneously giving users the means to report this type of content. | ||
| Well, if only that was true. | ||
| If only that was the reality. | ||
| If only it was people reporting things and platforms being held responsible for things like child pornography, calls to violence, violent content itself, pornography overall being introduced to children. | ||
| Of course, it's being framed as if this is somehow protecting children. | ||
| But the reality is that this is explicitly being put into place – I say explicitly because this is told to us by the people that are doing it, that it's there to prevent dissent from the government. | ||
| Plain and simple. | ||
| In fact, we can go to a video now, this is a member of the EU, talking about why the Digital Services Act is so important. | ||
| Let's go to the EU video now. | ||
| He says European law will apply to these platforms, meaning that when there is hateful content who calls for revolt or killing individuals, as we've seen, Yes, he says. | ||
| cars yes he says also that they will be forced to delete those instantly if they don't they'll be immediately penalized we have teams in place to intervene immediately if they don't act immediately then yes we'll be able not only to find them but ban them from operating on our territory do we have the means they ask Of course we can. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The law will do it. | |
| Not one person, one state, one board of directors. | ||
| It's our law. | ||
| We are equipped for this with a specific board. | ||
| But believe me, the interventions are going to be extremely rapid. | ||
| First of all, it's an ex ante regulation. | ||
| That means that the platforms will have to demonstrate to us That they have taken steps to apply the law, including the case we lived through. | ||
| Because there are invisible algorithms who push those highly viral content on top because they create ad revenue. | ||
| All of this will be strictly forbidden, which is why we're doing blank tests. | ||
| They must hire the Manaski. | ||
| Of course, it will be done by humans. | ||
| Meta, Facebook, Instagram. | ||
| He says, I went to see Zuckerberg 15 days ago in California with my teams. | ||
| He confirmed he had hired a thousand people to deal with this issue. | ||
| So the platforms are getting ready. | ||
| And so yes, from August 25th, what I told him was that given the situation, I regretted that they hadn't implemented it before. | ||
| You really should have been doing this before we had to tell you. | ||
| So in the same way that, you know, we were just discussing, How the UN is talking about doing this Cybercrime Censorship Act. | ||
| Story at Infowars. | ||
| More people are realizing the UN Cybercrime Treaty is an excuse for global surveillance. | ||
| The same thing, right? | ||
| Or the DSA. | ||
| Similar thing. | ||
| The countries will now have to have an office specifically designed to censor people, guided by a centralized board of directors. | ||
| In the EU. | ||
| And then each company will also have to hire people. | ||
| And they keep acting like this is being imposed on big tech companies. | ||
| You heard him say it right there. | ||
| You think Zuckerberg is against this? | ||
| You think anybody's- I mean, they are already censoring people on their own volition. | ||
| You think they're against- You think it's like this is being imposed on them? | ||
| They're like, no, we love free speech, no, please don't make us censor- No, they're excited. | ||
| They're hiring thousands of people to be permanent censors on the internet. | ||
| And the most important part of that clip, in my opinion, was the very first few seconds where he says, first of all, hate speech, whatever that means, whatever that could possibly be defined as. | ||
| It is literally nothing. | ||
| Saying just reality is hate speech to these people. | ||
| I'm telling you, if you say there's only a boy and a girl, if you say, oh, you were born as a boy, you're still a boy, like, that's hate speech to these people. | ||
| Even though it's undeniably true, they say hate speech is what this is for, hateful content. | ||
| They also say, who calls for revolt? | ||
| Or killing, obviously calling for killing individuals. | ||
| Is an important one. | ||
| What they're referencing when they say, you know, all the recent activities when France had all of those riots, you know, all of the migrants, the millions of Muslim, Somali, Afghani migrants that they brought in to France in total opposition of the desires of the majority of the French people and settled them in France without even trying to get them to assimilate to French lifestyle. | ||
| And those groups of foreigners who wave the flags of their home countries on the soil of France. | ||
| They would use social media to coordinate their riots. | ||
| So they've created the problem, of course. | ||
| They start the wars. | ||
| They fund and sponsor the NGOs that bring the people over. | ||
| The people start rioting, and they say, oh, well now you can't post hateful content because of these riots. | ||
| Caused the problem, and then the solution is more power to them. | ||
| How very convenient. | ||
| So hate speech and calls to revolt, in other words... | ||
| Like, where's that line get drawn? | ||
| I mean, we've seen it here in America. | ||
| If you are questioning the election, well, you're responsible for the Pearl Harbor level 9-11 event level happening that occurred on January 6th, 2021. | ||
| Right? | ||
| So, if you just oppose the government's plans, is that enough to consider it a call for revolt? | ||
| After all, you're spreading mis- or disinformation. | ||
| Now, if it's true, I think it's If it's true, it's disinformation. | ||
| If it's false, it's misinformation. | ||
| But it doesn't actually matter because they apply it to anything. | ||
| I think that's how it works. | ||
| But if you say something that the government disagrees with, or if you disagree with the government openly, will they consider that, you know, a call to revolt because you're telling people to oppose the government? | ||
| There's no limitations to this. | ||
| There's only endless censorship. | ||
| And we can hear You know, how this will affect companies that operate here in America as well. | ||
| The CEO of Signal explained the details of some of these online harms bills, the DSA and others like it, and how it will actually force people of the UK and elsewhere in Europe to actually participate in their own censorship and their own... It's not just restrictions of free speech, it's restrictions of thought, right? | ||
| Is that classic quote where it's like when you restrict someone's speech, there's really two victims, the person that was going to say it and the person that was going to hear it. | ||
| So they're restricting your access to thoughts, to information, to reality. | ||
| They are saying they are the dictators of reality and these people think men can get pregnant. | ||
| So just really think about that. | ||
| Watch this clip of the Signal CEO clip number five. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Imagine with a company like Signal, is when the regulator Ofcom is creating the codes of practice, they might say to Signal, what sort of data do you gather? | |
| And if Signal says, we don't gather data about people's messages, we can't possibly look at this. | ||
| The regulator won't say, you need to break encryption. | ||
| It'll say, that's fine. | ||
| But you do have policies, let's say, on legal and appropriate use. | ||
| How do you enforce those? | ||
| What do you do? | ||
| None of that is specified in the bill and this is our concern because we hear, you know, we hear things that are sensible like that from people like you and then we look at the bill and what is specified is a regime that would give Ofcom the power to demand that everyone in the UK downloads spyware that checks their messages before they're sent against a database of what is permissible to say and send and what is not permissible. | ||
| And that is a precedent that authoritarian regimes are looking to the UK to set, to point to a liberal democracy that was the first to expand surveillance in the UN Human Rights Commissioner. | ||
| This is unprecedented paradigm shifting surveillance and paradigm shifting not in the good way. | ||
| And of course, I find it comical to even refer to the UK as a liberal democracy, considering that they arrest per capita far more people than a place like Russia, which has a reputation of being a totalitarian state, a state where free speech is not valued whatsoever. | ||
| And yet, in the UK, a 14-year-old autistic girl can be dragged out of her house kicking and screaming by jack-booted thugs for saying that a lesbian looks like a lesbian. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So, I mean, to refer even to the UK as a liberal democracy is absurd on the face of it. | ||
| However, I do think she has a point, that was the CEO of Signal, has a point that, I mean, they're setting a precedent that will be used by tyrannical regimes, you know, like the UK or the EU. | ||
| Or any of the people actually imposing this stuff. | ||
| But moving on a little bit, that was just the biggest story from last week. | ||
| The DSA. | ||
| The Digital Services Act in the EU. | ||
| Not speculation, not a warning of what is to come. | ||
| Simply an explanation about what's actually occurring. | ||
| And then this also, we could go on with DSA because part of it is about the algorithms. | ||
| Right? | ||
| The DSA bans targeting advertising based on a person's sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, or political beliefs and puts restriction on targeting ads to children. | ||
| It also requires online platform to provide more transparency on how their algorithms work. | ||
| And it's very dangerous to see the government participate in guiding algorithms since we know what they want. | ||
| And basically they're demanding that algorithms take into account their biases. | ||
| Right so if an algorithm purely based off of data comes out with a conclusion that these psychopath weirdos think is racism because maybe it You know, there's a real-life example of an algorithm looking at prisoners and determining whether or not they're likely to re-offend. | ||
| And I don't think race was an aspect of what the algorithm was looking at. | ||
| It was just looking at pure data. | ||
| And by the way, it's a machine that doesn't have racism possible in its makeup. | ||
| I mean, again, just ridiculous, outright absurd. | ||
| But because more black people were deemed as likely to re-offend than white people, even though that wasn't something that the computer took into account, they said this algorithm is racist and it must be rewritten to compensate for the racist outcome that it came out with. | ||
| So, incredibly dangerous to have the government going in, not just looking at, but actually helping to redesign algorithms to benefit and to support their biases, even though their biases are In contradiction with the algorithm comes out with because they're not based in reality and the algorithm is a computer that just looks at numbers. | ||
| So anyway, we'll move on from the DSA now. | ||
| There's a whole heck of a lot more to talk about from Ben Scallon on Substack. | ||
| Soros funded NGOs demand crackdown on free speech as politicians spread hate misinformation. | ||
| Open Society foundation backed NGOs are pushing for censorship agenda in Ireland and Scotland that includes police searches of homes, phones and computers. | ||
| Hatred of racial, religious, and sexual minorities is rising dangerously in Ireland, say the country's leaders. | ||
| Hate-based offences have become increasingly common in recent years, said Ireland's Justice Minister, Helen McEntee, last June. | ||
| Irish police, she said, have reported a 20% increase in reported hate crimes in 2022 compared to the previous year. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My God. | |
| My God, what are we going to do? | ||
| Ireland is 22% more hateful than it was last year. | ||
| Quick, call the police! | ||
| However, an increase in the reporting of hate offenses is different from an actual increase. | ||
| For police to classify something as a hate offense, which is either a crime or an incident, which is a hate act that is not criminalized, no actual proof or evidence is required beyond somebody simply calling it that. | ||
| The police themselves admit that the threshold for perception required for this is very low. | ||
| In other words, if you insult or, you know, in some way offend against a gay person, they'll just say it's because I'm gay, now it's a hate incident. | ||
| Even if it's not even a crime, right? | ||
| Even if you just, like what happened in the UK, call a lesbian a lesbian, that apparently is a hate incident that goes on this docket. | ||
| Also, at the same time, you're seeing a massive increase in Outward pushing and propaganda of LGBT stuff, right? | ||
| So they're allowed to spread their religion, which these are moral questions. | ||
| This is a religious framework that they're dealing with. | ||
| But if you oppose it with a opposing religion or an opposing moral framework, then you're the hateful one. | ||
| So obviously there's going to be an increase in the amount of opposition when there's an increase in the amount of propaganda, just like you're going to have An increase in incidents between... Yeah, told a female cop you look like my lesbian Nana. | ||
| Well, arrest her. | ||
| Haul her away. | ||
| They literally did. | ||
| But also, if you're bringing in, you know, millions of foreigners, then the amount of incidents between natives and foreigners is going to increase. | ||
| And as we know, and as has been shown, any incident between a native and a foreigner will be considered hate speech on behalf of the native. | ||
| Hate crime, I should say. | ||
| Hate incident, to use the Orwellian term. | ||
| Hate incident. | ||
| It's just, we're not even getting into the aspect that, you know, hates an idea, hates a feeling, hates not something that you can actually write laws to mitigate, but we'll just take it As they do. | ||
| Because we can still oppose this in a thousand different ways without even getting into whether writing laws against hate is even something possible. | ||
| But it continues, in fact, you don't even have to be the victim of an alleged crime to report it. | ||
| A random bystander who has nothing to do with the event can say, I think it was based on prejudice and it will be categorized as such. | ||
| Someone could report an obvious joke between laughing friends as a hate incident to the police. | ||
| None of this is to say that Ireland is free from hatred. | ||
| Certainly throughout history, the Emerald Isle has had periods of animosity and strife. | ||
| Yeah, they hated being a subject of tyrannical rulers of the British Crown. | ||
| How dare they, right? | ||
| That's the exact type of hate that these people will be, that these laws will be dealing with. | ||
| But the increase of hate bait offenses is clearly from an increase in reporting, not actual hate crimes or actual incidents. | ||
| It was also in Ireland where they called it a hate crime for a cafe to have a Bible quote displayed on their walls. | ||
| That was the story that we covered, I believe, in 2021. | ||
| Since 2019, the police and government have openly urged people to come forward and report hate incidents. | ||
| In 2021, the police said that their goal was to increase levels of reported hate crime. | ||
| The idea was that these hate crimes were already occurring and nobody wanted to report them for some reason, although there's no evidence to support that claim. | ||
| A large body of research finds people around the world label more things as hate harmful or hateful today than they did in the past. | ||
| Such seems to be the case in Ireland. | ||
| The government's own data about This shows that Ireland is ultimately an unbelievably tolerant country. | ||
| About 80% of the Irish surveyed recently said they were very comfortable living next door to people with different nationalities, ethnicities, genders, sexual orientations, disabilities, religious beliefs, or no religious belief, or marital statuses. | ||
| So again, whether it's like what's happening in France where they bring in millions of foreigners and those foreigners riot and then they say, oh, French people, you have to You know, have censorship laws now and you have to have permission before you post anything because of the violence and chaos we created. | ||
| You have laws being passed to create hate incidences out of thin air where they didn't exist before and an encouragement of the public to report these and making it easier for the police to categorize things as hate incidences. | ||
| And then they point at that and say, look, hate is rising. | ||
| We need more laws to counter hate. | ||
| We need more censorship. | ||
| We need more control. | ||
| We need more access to your devices, et cetera, et cetera. | ||
| It's a scam. | ||
| It's a scam. | ||
| And I don't think that's complicated. | ||
| So how are Soros and his friends getting involved in this? | ||
| Well, in the same way that they always have, by funding NGOs. | ||
| I kind of like the term NGO because I think previous to, you know, the proliferation of these types of things, you'd have to call them something like charities, but these aren't charities. | ||
| They're just non-governmental organizations. | ||
| They're just organizations. | ||
| They're just groups of people that are funded by billionaires to achieve certain goals. | ||
| It's not being charitable to anybody. | ||
| Of course they'll say, he's a philanthropist. | ||
| George Soros, he's a philanthropist. | ||
| What's his philanthropy? | ||
| He's paying groups of academics to write laws to criminalize speech. | ||
| You know, philanthropy. | ||
| Or like... | ||
| Mark Benioff, second in command at the World Economic Forum. | ||
| His number two label on Wikipedia is Philanthropist. | ||
| His philanthropy? | ||
| Funding hospitals to create entire wings to deal with transgender children. | ||
| Oh thanks, what would we do without you? | ||
| Such lovely philanthropy for the doubt-trodden trans children. | ||
| Amazing. | ||
| So I told you to remember this name, Reid Hoffman. | ||
| Reid Hoffman and George Soros back new media firm to combat disinformation. | ||
| This story is actually from 2021, but it relates to the story we were just covering. | ||
| A new public benefit corporation backed by billionaires Reid Hoffman, George Soros, and others is launching Tuesday to fund new media companies and efforts to tackle disinformation. | ||
| It's called Good Information, Inc. | ||
| It aims to fund and scale businesses that cut through echo chambers with fact-based information. | ||
| As part of this mission, it plans to invest in local news companies. | ||
| It will be led by Tara McGowan, former Democratic strategist who previously ran a progressive non-profit called ACRONYM. | ||
| It invested in for-profit companies that built media and technology solutions for progressive causes. | ||
| So this is like the future of so-called democracy. | ||
| They'll keep calling it democracy when in reality what it will be will be seemingly dueling. | ||
| But for the things that matter, very complicit groups of highly funded billionaire-backed activists. | ||
| And it will be a competition of who can sigh up the most number of people into going along with their lie. | ||
| I mean that's it. | ||
| That's democracy from now on. | ||
| They'll have control of the methods of communication. | ||
| They'll have their agents not only in dedicated public offices but also in departments throughout big tech and social media. | ||
| And they'll call themselves philanthropists. | ||
| They'll call this intervention about disinformation. | ||
| But it's simple and uncomplicated speech control. | ||
| It's censorship. | ||
| It is an oligarchical control of your method of information. | ||
| Therefore, your ability to contend with, react to, and understand the world as it is. | ||
| That's happening. | ||
| It's happening rapidly. | ||
| And I'm just getting started. | ||
| We'll be back for the second hour with your calls and more stories. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Second hour of Sunday Night Live here on InfoWars.com and Band.Video. | ||
| We're going to continue to talk about the threats to free speech and try to illustrate just how widespread opposition to free speech is and how it's being coordinated and brought about by the biggest scumbags the world has ever seen. | ||
| You know, philanthropists. | ||
| Philanthropists. | ||
| You know, like George Soros, noted philanthropist and also Nazi collaborator, but mostly it's the philanthropy he wants us to talk about. | ||
| We'll open up the phone lines for your calls. | ||
| In fact, we'll go ahead and do that right now. | ||
| The number to dial if you want to call in about any topic, really, since we'll move on from free speech here in just a second and cover some of the other major stories that are coming out. | ||
| But if you want to call in, give us a call. | ||
|
unidentified
|
1-877-789-2539. | |
| That's 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Give us a call. | ||
|
unidentified
|
1-877-789-2539. | |
| We are live on this Sunday evening broadcast for the 27th of August, 2023. | ||
| That's 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Give us a call. 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| We are live on this Sunday evening broadcast for the 27th of August, 2023. | ||
| And, you know, it's becoming more difficult to do our job. | ||
| See, it was easy when they actually tried to hide this sort of stuff. | ||
| All we had to do was expose it. | ||
| All we had to do was find out what they were doing and then tell you about it. | ||
| Now they're just doing it out in the open. | ||
| And I guess we have to try to make people care. | ||
| It actually is strangely more difficult. | ||
| Because they're just doing it. | ||
| They're just doing it right out in the open. | ||
| And apparently they have Americans so brainwashed, people around the world really, so brainwashed, They're like, we can't see what's being done to us even when they announce it to us. | ||
| It's kind of crazy. | ||
| I mean, you think about the World Economic Forum coming out with ads that say like, you will own nothing, you will have no privacy, but you'll be happy. | ||
| It's like, well, gee, you're taking my job now. | ||
| I'm supposed to tell them about your despicable, disgusting, anti-human plans. | ||
| You can't just go out and say it. | ||
| What the heck? | ||
| Globalists? | ||
| I don't even know what to say, except that they're telling the truth. | ||
| And when people tell you who they are, you should listen to them. | ||
| And when they tell you, you will own nothing and you will have no privacy, they mean that about you, right? | ||
| These are the people where they've got 10 foot high walls around They're every compound, and they've got a lot of them. | ||
| These are the people like Mark Zuckerberg, who spends something like $40 million a year, or was it $40 million over three years? | ||
| He spends a fortune every single year on personal security to make sure you, and anyone like you, can't get anywhere near him. | ||
| They'll have privacy. | ||
| They'll have impenetrable privacy. | ||
| They'll own everything. | ||
| You think they won't own anything? | ||
| They own everything already. | ||
| They're just going to own it outright soon enough. | ||
| And when they say you won't own anything, what they mean is you'll have to rent everything, you'll have to ask them for permission to have anything, everything will be run on debt, and they'll get to decide who gets the debt and who doesn't, who gets the loans and who won't. | ||
| So just believe them when they tell you. | ||
| When they say you will own nothing, that's what they mean. | ||
| They don't say, we will own nothing and we will be happy because they don't intend on owning nothing. | ||
| They don't intend on giving up their privacy. | ||
| They will protect their privacy with all of the things that they own and money that they have and power structures at their disposal, unless we stop them. | ||
| So again, just returning to this Axios article quickly, you've got Reid Hoffman, who is the founder of LinkedIn and George Soros, who is a I don't know, some sort of vampire parasite? | ||
| Some sort of demon in human skin? | ||
| Some sort of undead apparition from the depths of hell? | ||
| I'm kidding, of course. | ||
| He's got a very important job. | ||
| His job is to manipulate markets and then make millions off of it. | ||
| That's how he got rich. | ||
| He got rich crashing the British pound. | ||
| Sending untold millions of people into financial straits. | ||
| That's his job. | ||
| That's what he did. | ||
| At least Reid Hoffman founded a website. | ||
| George Soros never even did that. | ||
| Just think about who these people are. | ||
| And then it makes sense what they're doing. | ||
| So Reid Hoffman, founder of LinkedIn. | ||
| George Soros, founder of hell. | ||
| are starting a group called Good Information Inc. | ||
| It'll be led by Tara McGowan, who is a Democrat strategist who previously ran a progressive nonprofit called ACRONYM. | ||
| ACRONYM invested in for-profit companies, and they were one of the largest digital companies campaigning against Donald Trump in the 2020 election. | ||
| They spent $100 million to stop him from becoming president. | ||
| One of the companies it invested in, called Shadow, made headlines last year for contributing to the delayed reporting of the Iowa caucus results. | ||
| Oh, what a coincidence. | ||
| Well, what a coincidence, isn't it? | ||
| George Soros and Reid Hoffman are teaming up with a woman who founded a company to stop Trump from getting president that happened to contribute to the delayed reporting of Iowa caucus results. | ||
| What an unquestionable coincidence that is. | ||
| And it's just like, I mean, this stuff that they say where there's this, although this is what they say, this is what they expect you to believe, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Although backed and launched by progressives, McGowan says the group could make investments to entities across the political spectrum so long as their editorial standards support fact-based information. | ||
| Oh, sure, you know, progressives, the understanding reasonable people. | ||
| It's just like, okay, sure. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| She points to, quote, The Bulwark, a center-right news site founded in opposition to Trumpism. | ||
| As an example of the type of center-right news outlet it could fund. | ||
| Yeah, okay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| No, they'll support you if you're right-wing, as long as, you know, you support left-wing causes. | ||
| As long as you're opposed to the primary right-wing candidate, then they're happy to invest in right-wingers. | ||
| I mean, just don't fall for this, I guess, would be the thing that everyone should know. | ||
| But then in addition to this, so the Advisory Committee has White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer, Civic Signal founder L. Eli Pariser, Check My Ads co-founder Nandini Jami, No, it's a beautiful name. | ||
| Former Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun-Times editor, Mark Jacob. | ||
| Accountable tech co-founder, Nicole Gill, and others. | ||
| You can see a couple of bigwigs. | ||
| You know, a couple of people in the White House. | ||
| A couple of major owners of national newspapers. | ||
| And of course, Nandini. | ||
| I have a name for my next kid. | ||
| Lol Nandini Jammy. | ||
| Alright. | ||
| Craig Newark, the founder of Craigslist, has invested millions to support factual reporting through his non-profit, Craig Newmark Philanthropies. | ||
| See, there's the word. | ||
| Hey, call it a philanthropy and just do whatever the hell you want, I guess. | ||
| I'd like to do this. | ||
| Yeah, I run a philanthropy. | ||
| We encourage fact-based reporting. | ||
| She's like, really, what do you do? | ||
| It's like, well, anybody that talks trash about me online, I smear and destroy and I get advertisers to boycott and I get them removed off their platforms. | ||
| I'm a philanthropy. | ||
| So if you talk bad about me, my philanthropy will break your knees. | ||
| I'm a philanthropist. | ||
| Steve Ballmer, former Microsoft CEO, founded USAFacts, a non-profit designed to make accurate data accessible and understandable in 2017. | ||
| Lorraine Powell Jobs, who of course owns Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, has invested in several journalism organizations, including Axios, through her investment group, Emerson Collective. | ||
| And what's happening next is that they'll raise more awareness about immediate solutions to counter disinformation before it spreads. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Oh, pre-crime. | ||
| Wonderful. | ||
| Amazing. | ||
| I'm like halfway through my list. | ||
| So we'll go through the rest of these quickly and then go out to your phone calls here for the rest of the hour. | ||
| Just so you know. | ||
| I mean, all these are from this week. | ||
| This last story was from a little while ago, but it talks about what George Soros is doing to counter misinformation, a.k.a. | ||
| information he don't like. | ||
| Justin Trudeau's online news act has caused a news blackout as wildfires rage. | ||
| This on InfoWars.com. | ||
| In an age where digital platforms are primary sources of real-time information, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's clash with Mark Zuckerberg's meta, formerly Facebook, has become more poignant than ever. | ||
| With wildfires raging across the country, the stakes are high. | ||
| Earlier this summer, Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, made a controversial move in response to the Online News Act, introduced by Trudeau's administration, legislation that forced tech companies to pay failing legacy news publishers that his Facebook blocked access to news stories for all Canada-based users. | ||
| This meant that Canadians couldn't click on news stories from any local outlets, a restriction not just limited to Facebook, but extended to Instagram as well. | ||
| So they found themselves incapable of finding easily accessible information about wildfires that may have threatened them personally because of this online news act. | ||
| And of course, Justin Trudeau blames Facebook. | ||
| With wildfires threatening the safety and homes of tens of thousands, the standoff has become a matter of life and death. | ||
| In an emergency situation, up-to-date local information is more important than ever. | ||
| Trudeau complained, of course, not mentioning that the scenario was entirely his fault. | ||
| It's happening in Canada as well, the Online News Agency Act or whatever it's called. | ||
| But it's not just NGOs, it's not just the George Soros's of the world, it's not just the EU and the UN, it's also major corporations including banks. | ||
| Bank of America this week terminated the account of a Christian charity that supported orphaned Ugandans. | ||
| Bank of America completely shut down a bank account held by Memphis-based Christian nonprofit called Indigenous Advanced Ministries. | ||
| The organization, which is known for its various charitable operations, such as its support for impoverished and orphaned Ugandan children, while they're a notably Christian organization that's pro-life, opposes the concept of marriage being shared by anything other than one man and one woman, and then they had their opposes the concept of marriage being shared by anything other than one man and one woman, and then they had their bank account completely canceled by Bank of America with no explanation, which had them scrambling to try to keep their operations, such as orphanages in Uganda, | ||
| You know, the people running the orphanage for several weeks as this changeover occurred. | ||
| Well, nothing's funny about this, but the most ironic or ridiculous or silly or outrageous or infuriating part of this is the Bank of America actually says it has nothing to do with their religious beliefs. | ||
| Because obviously, we still have some remnant of the First Amendment, the five freedoms embodied in those. | ||
| One of the most important ones is the freedom of religion. | ||
| So when you have major banks, one of the biggest banks in the whole world, for which millions upon millions of people rely on for their everyday financial transactions, if they're banning charitable organizations because they're Christian, it's kind of a major issue. | ||
| So they say, no, no, no, it has nothing to do with you guys being Christian, which is so funny because it's like, okay, then what is it about? | ||
| What problem do you have with this organization? | ||
| I mean, you're not accusing them of fraud. | ||
| You're not accusing them of, you know, running some shell company. | ||
| You're not, like, you admit, you acknowledge they are a real charity that's really doing good things. | ||
| So what is it about this charity that is causing you to delete their account? | ||
| You've got all these characteristics of the charity. | ||
| They're Christian. | ||
| They believe in You know, they're pro-life, they believe in marriage between a man and a woman, they oppose gay marriage, and they help orphaned Ugandan children. | ||
| So which one of these things do you have a problem with? | ||
| Well, it's definitely not the Christian thing. | ||
| Okay, so Bank of America is just like, we refuse to work with charities? | ||
| We refuse to work with orphans? | ||
| Ugh, gross, we hate orphans? | ||
| Like, what is the thing you have a problem with if it's not religion? | ||
| It is religion, obviously. | ||
| The other side of this maybe could be that Bank of America is like, no, it has nothing to do with religion. | ||
| It just has to do with we want tolerance and we want, you know, you to treat people fairly. | ||
| And it's not fair when you say that you think marriage should be between a man and a woman. | ||
| So they take blatantly moral, religious concepts. | ||
| They just Pretend like these aren't religious or moral questions, and then they ban you on those things and say, no, it has nothing to do with religion. | ||
| We're just gay. | ||
| I guess. | ||
| Representatives of the group have repeatedly asked for a justification to the shutdown of this. | ||
| And, uh, they didn't say anything. | ||
| They actually said the same thing twice, which was this. | ||
| Upon review of your accounts, we have determined you're operating a business type. | ||
| We have chosen not to service at Bank of America. | ||
| You know, charities, orphanages, things that help people. | ||
| Oh, not here, mister. | ||
| Not at my Bank of America. | ||
| I don't think so. | ||
| Those orphans can take care of themselves. | ||
| Meanwhile, I think this is, no, no, we've got more. | ||
| No, we've got more. | ||
| Here, let's stick to the corporations here for a moment. | ||
| We will go to your phone calls in a second, but just to finish up here, National Poll says this story from today, X, that is Twitter, is hiring staff to combat election disinfo. | ||
| Social media platform is actively seeking to hire a so-called disinformation specialist, releasing a call for applications in an effort to censor certain users ahead of the 2024 election. | ||
| This move has sparked concern, especially in relation to similar actions taken during the 2020 election and the acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk, who pledged to uphold the values of free speech. | ||
| Critics, including Mike Binns from the Foundation for Freedom Online, have raised the issue of possible covert censorship channels and an increased threat to online freedom if those positions are filled. | ||
| The job postings have been promoted through DisinfoDocket.com, a site affiliated with anti-disinformation groups with ties to federal cybersecurity agencies. | ||
| These developments raise questions about the true intentions behind the creation of these positions and how they align with the concept of free speech. | ||
| Which, of course, they don't. | ||
| They could hire me. | ||
| I'm a disinformation expert. | ||
| I cover disinformation every single day. | ||
| I break it down in an easy to understand format. | ||
| Every time the MSM comes out with some ridiculous lie, I'm happy to provide the reality there. | ||
| Will they hire me? | ||
| Am I in the running for a disinformation censor on Twitter? | ||
| Or will it be a disinformation expert Like Jacinda Ardern or some other totalitarian scumbag that considers any opposition to the government mandates disinformation. | ||
| Finally, we have this story. | ||
| Germany's new whistleblower law risks a return to Stasi area. | ||
| I remind you that Germany also, about two weeks ago, floated the idea of banning an entire political party because that political party was too popular as it creeped over 20% support amongst the wider German public. | ||
| Germany is quietly building a huge surveillance apparatus that risks creating a denunciation culture similar to those of the Nazis and the Stasi, one of the country's leading historians has claimed. | ||
| He claimed Berlin is setting up a sprawling system of tip-off points inside companies and in government authorities that will facilitate people snitching on co-workers and doing so was quote unnoticed by the public. | ||
| Germany's whistleblower protection law came into force in July with the stated purpose of protecting people who report on workplace abuses All companies with more than 49 members of staff must set up an office where staff can anonymously report on suspected abuses of the law without fear of retribution. | ||
| The tip-off points, he says, won't only pursue suspicions of criminality, they will also deal with misdemeanors subject to fines, he wrote in a German newspaper this week. | ||
| They will even be responsible for statements by officials that constitute a violation of the obligation of loyalty to the Constitution. | ||
| So German law is setting up that any company over 49 people will have to create an office in their company who will Be a snitch office. | ||
| It's the office of the snitch. | ||
| It's the office of the so-called whistleblower that will actually be there to denounce anybody who opposes the globo-homo-globalist supernational organization taking over the world right now. | ||
| An anti-feminist tip-off portal run by the Amido Antonio Foundation, an anti-discrimination NGO funded by the federal government. | ||
| Well, wait a second. | ||
| Can we just call that a G.O. | ||
| then? | ||
| Let's call that a G.O. | ||
| if it's a non-governmental organization funded by the government. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| What are we doing here? | ||
| So this G.O. | ||
| funded by the federal government is particularly aggravating to conservatives. | ||
| It encourages people to report on those who distribute flyers critical of gender theory or attempt to disrupt feminist events. | ||
| The far-right Alternative for Germany party has employed similar tactics in education. | ||
| In 2018, it set up a website encouraging people to report on teachers who contravened against their obligation to neutrality. | ||
| That sounds completely different to me, but what do I know? | ||
| I'm just an American who has free speech in his blood. | ||
| Let's go out to your phone calls now. | ||
| Rick is in FEMA Region 4. | ||
| You are on the air. | ||
| Rick, go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Harrison, first time speaking, brother. | |
| Long-time American Journal listener. | ||
| First and foremost, Thank you for what you, Alex Owen, and the crew do to awaken the sheeple of the world. | ||
| Thanks for your support, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| The whole signal scenario, it isn't here in the U.S. | ||
| yet, but not surprised if it hits soon. | ||
| And I say that because Friday night, the Apple overlords, they blocked me from sending the Alex and Kate interview via the Mad Max News TV link. | ||
| From an iPhone to my brother's Android, and I sent it to him ten times, and he's like, they're not blocking your text. | ||
| And I sent him screenshots, and he was like, wow, I cannot believe that that did not come through. | ||
| So you could send him other texts, you could send him other links, but when you tried to send him a link to a MadMaxWorld.tv, aka Band.Video link, it just didn't go through. | ||
| It didn't give you an error message? | ||
| Did it give you an error message? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Nope. | |
| No errors whatsoever. | ||
| And I screenshotted multiple times. | ||
| And when I sent it to him, he's like, I cannot believe that that is doing that. | ||
| So it lets you think that you sent the text. | ||
| It just never shows up on his phone. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| And he screenshotted on his side, showing that it never shows up. | ||
| And me asking, did you get my text? | ||
| Blah, blah, blah. | ||
| It was unbelievable. | ||
| Unbelievable. | ||
| And that's the actual text message. | ||
| You're not using Facebook or some other messenger, you're using... No, just straight text messages. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And then what's peculiar, crazy about it is, I did then take it and put it in Signal, and he got it instantly. | |
| He was flabbergasted. | ||
| So, like I said, it's not happening U.S. | ||
| side yet, but as you alluded to already, needing more access to our devices always has been and always will be. | ||
| 1984 scam. | ||
| That's wild, Rick, and I'm surprised they would do that on text messages. | ||
| I've heard of that type of thing, like on Facebook or Instagram, you know, things you can't post there, you also can't message to each other there. | ||
| That's very concerning if that's what they're doing on your average text message site. | ||
| I wonder, did you try to send it to anybody else? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, that's just it. | |
| He sent it to other people and it went through. | ||
| Okay, so it must have been Apple. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Eric, you know, Mr. Nobody Me, and it's getting blocked. | |
| But one last thing, man. | ||
| Everybody out there, do not take this broadcast for granted. | ||
| Get out to Infowarsstore.com and get something that you need. | ||
| Hey, be well. | ||
| I told Owen to get you on Owen Troyer Live. | ||
| Good to talk to you, man. | ||
| Oh, that'd be fun. | ||
| Alright, yeah. | ||
| Thank you so much for everything, Rick. | ||
| I mean, Rick's doing everything right, folks. | ||
| He's spreading the links. | ||
| He's telling people that don't know. | ||
| He's reporting to us what's happening when he's being censored, calling in, being an active info warrior, participating in the broadcast itself, and telling you to go to infowarestore.com. | ||
| Thank you very much, Rick, for all of your support. | ||
| We really do appreciate it. | ||
| Very good to hear from you, sir. | ||
| Let's go now to Bart in Georgia. | ||
| You want to talk about the Digital Service Act in the EU? | ||
| Go ahead, Bart, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, the Digital Services Act is the final nail in the coffin of Europe. | |
| Europe is a failed society. | ||
| It cannot be saved, but maybe we can save this country. | ||
| I mean, it's sad. | ||
| It's probably true, though. | ||
| I mean, we see, you know, what's happening, even if you can... And you know, this is all on top of what they're doing behind... Like, this is what we know about. | ||
| I'm reading from mainstream media articles, or I'm reading from Infowars.com, where we back it up with sources. | ||
| Then you have things like, earlier this year, at the World Government Summit, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, you have Alex Karp of... | ||
| A Palantir saying, yeah, our Gotham program single-handedly stopped the rise of the far right in Europe. | ||
| So what does that mean? | ||
| That means an American company of surveillance and algorithms, a big tech company, somehow single-handedly stopped a political movement or even like a political wing from coming to prominence in Europe and they're bragging about it. | ||
| How did they do that? | ||
| How did they stop the rise of the so-called far right? | ||
| And what do they consider far-right, right? | ||
| Anything that opposes them. | ||
| They call you far-right if you're just sick of Biden economics costing you $700 a month more because of inflation, right? | ||
| You're a far-right mag extremist. | ||
| So again, everything we're talking about are like the laws they're passing and the things that the government's actually doing out in the open. | ||
| But on top of that, you've got these manipulators behind the scenes Stopping the rise of the far right. | ||
| Just taking full control of the politics of entire continents and then saying that they're doing it for democracy and we have to go to war for democracy and democracy is our highest value and we have to imprison anybody that opposes our democracy. | ||
| Their democracy is what they control. | ||
| If they control it, if they dictate what you're allowed and not allowed to support in the political realm, then it's a democracy. | ||
| If it's the people as a collective doing things that oppose the control of the... I like what Jacob Chansley, aka QAnon, aka American Shaman calls him, the less than 1%. | ||
| If you oppose them, well, then you're anti-democratic and you have to be silenced. | ||
| So you've just given up hope on Europe as a continent, Bart. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, and I have one final statement that's going to be banned by the DSA. | |
| God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. | ||
| I can hear the sirens already, and they're those weird UK sirens coming to get you, Bart. | ||
| Just appreciate the First Amendment, folks. | ||
| I really do feel bad, and we're talking a lot about Europe today because that's where a lot of this is happening, but we have a lot of viewers in Europe. | ||
| I don't know if they'll even be able to see our broadcast anymore now that these things are coming into effect. | ||
| I mean, I guarantee you InfoWars, despite constantly and forever and for every second we've ever been on the air advocating for Peace amongst all men, nothing racist, nothing sexist, nothing antisemitic, homophobic, like we really do love everyone. | ||
| We are never shy about expressing that, and yet they're gonna, you know, call us far-right, dangerous disinformation and silence us. | ||
| So not only are we talking about this for the sake of our European audience, but America's really got to know How good we have it. | ||
| Even when it doesn't seem like it, we have it so much better than they do in Europe, because we still do have the First Amendment. | ||
| Speaking of our fans in Europe, we've got Johnny in Denmark. | ||
| Thanks so much for the call, Bart. | ||
| Johnny in Denmark, you're talking about Dr. Shiva. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Johnny. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, hi Harrison. | |
| Yeah, as I was waiting, it just occurred to me, just to mention, that there seems to be a feeling that Freedom of speech is constitutionally guaranteed only in the U.S. | ||
| Not quite true. | ||
| Actually, the Danish Constitution guarantees freedom of speech since 1849, which is a good thing. | ||
| And it's not only a theoretical phenomenon, it's in practice. | ||
| I feel there's a lot more freedom of speech allowed here than there is, for example, in the U.S. | ||
| Practically speaking, I don't know if I were in the U.S. | ||
| whether I'd have the Interesting. | ||
| See, I stand corrected. | ||
| Of course, I would say that we're the only ones where it's like a part of our founding documents. | ||
| Like, obviously, Denmark has existed in various forms for a very long time. | ||
| So they've had a free speech in their constitution since 1849, though I didn't know that. | ||
| Um, and and that's actually you're seeing that you see that in practice. | ||
| How do you see that manifest in in Denmark, Johnny? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Um, you know, when I see the kinds of things and hear the kinds of things all front and forth, um, that are, you know, happening, which you've done a very good job of documenting today, those things generally don't exist in Denmark. | |
| Um, the kind of kinds of, uh, You know, like this nonsense about, let's just take for example, a very obvious and relevant and timely example, the December 6th hearings. | ||
| Utter nonsense! | ||
| I mean, you know, it's just not only a miscarriage, but a perversion of justice. | ||
| You know, getting people like Owen Schreier and Alex Jones and Donald Trump even, who were actually calling specifically, explicitly, Interesting. | ||
| Right. | ||
| for, you know, violence. | ||
| That would never happen in Denmark. | ||
| Interesting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Also, freedom from vaccination or pseudo vaccination is actually quite a bit better. | |
| So-called vaccination. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| In Scandinavia, as you probably know, Sweden had the most lenient. | ||
| Lockdown sort of measures. | ||
| Yeah, and Denmark was one of the first to categorize COVID as just another flu, basically. | ||
| You're right, Denmark does in a lot of ways stand out as different than its European neighbors. | ||
| I wonder how long that will persist. | ||
| Thank you so much for the call, Johnny. | ||
| I'm sorry we didn't get to your comment about Dr. Shiva. | ||
| I know you're a big fan of Dr. Shiva, and I know our audience is as well. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side. | ||
| More of your phone calls don't go anywhere. | ||
| Final segment of Sunday Night Live. | ||
| It's not Saturday, is it? | ||
| We'll be right back. - Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Sunday Night Live continues here on Band.Video, InfoWars.com, brought to you, of course, by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Go there now to take advantage of the Christmas in August sales event, the biggest sale of the year, so far. | ||
| Up to 60% off our top selling products, including a flash sale on Vitamin Mineral Fusion and Survival Shield X3. | ||
| Despite being some of our most popular products, they are on massive discount. | ||
| 40% off each one of those. | ||
| You can elevate your daily routine with premium nutrients that help support your energy, immunity, and overall vitality. | ||
| Discover the ultimate blend of essential vitamins and minerals carefully crafted to fuel your body and mind. | ||
| Both of these products are limited in their supply. | ||
| So visit InfoWarsStore.com today and get these best-selling products before it's too late. | ||
| Add again 40% off with the limited-time flash sale, part of the Christmas in August sales event at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Now we are going to go out to your phone calls. | ||
| Again, before we do, I want to go to a video of another man in the process of leveling up. | ||
| I don't know if I've heard it in a while, but Alex used to always talk about that concept of leveling up. | ||
| If anybody's, you know, plays video games, you know exactly what we're talking about. | ||
| It's not a hard concept to understand, right? | ||
| Certain points in your life, things like you get more powerful, but things get harder. | ||
| Things get more difficult. | ||
| The opposition that you face becomes stronger as well. | ||
| And I see Tucker Carlson going through that as we speak in a really epic and powerful way. | ||
| Honestly, it's an exciting time to be alive, and Tucker Carlson is going independent, obviously, getting massive guests for his Twitter-exclusive show, really proving that Fox News is never a necessity for him. | ||
| But if anything, which may be holding him back, the latest rumor is that Tucker Carlson is reaching out to Vladimir Putin, maybe do an interview with him. | ||
| And if you recall, I believe the NSA was spying on Tucker Carlson Claiming he was a Russian agent because he was trying to interview the leader of a prominent country with whom we are inching ever closer to nuclear war. | ||
| How dare he try to speak to, you know, a foreigner from Russia? | ||
| How dare he? | ||
| But this is Tucker Carlson giving a speech. | ||
| He went on an epic rant about modern life and nature. | ||
| Watch that here and then go back out to your phone calls. | ||
| But here is Tucker Carlson. | ||
| And what's sad, in my opinion, is that while the United States still has, I think, a lot to offer to the world, and I would never leave because it's, and no offense meant by this, and I hope none will be taken, it is the prettiest country in the world. | ||
| It is, let's be honest. | ||
| Even the crummy... Sorry, sorry. | ||
| It is. | ||
| It's beautiful. | ||
| And it has wonderful people. | ||
| And I know many of you have relatives there. | ||
| A lot of you are Americans. | ||
| You know exactly what I'm talking about. | ||
| It's been taken over by lunatics. | ||
| But the core of the country has not changed. | ||
| But what's so interesting to me is that the people running in the United States are no longer even pretending to offer a better life to the people who live there. | ||
| Which is a huge change. | ||
| I mean, throughout the course of my life until fairly recently, we had people I voted for in office, people I would never vote for in office, but all of them made basically the same promise. | ||
| Elect me, give me power, and I will make your life better. | ||
| And here's how I'll do it. | ||
| I never hear anybody make that case in the United States. | ||
| And what they're offering is a world in which human flourishing is, if not impossible, very difficult. | ||
| The ruling party is the party of the childless, the unmarried, the people who are working for low wages for large corporations and living in tiny apartments in overcrowded cities that are rife with crime. | ||
| That's not a cliche. | ||
| That's true. | ||
| It's not a talking point. | ||
| It's true. | ||
| Who votes for the people who run the United States right now? | ||
| People who are, again, working for big non-profits or big banks, living in crowded conditions, very often alone, in big soulless cities, having their food delivered by immigrants, and spending their time glued to a screen. | ||
| What does that sound like to you? | ||
| It sounds like prison, actually. | ||
| It sounds like prison. | ||
| When people violate our laws in the United States, how do we punish them? | ||
| Well, we execute a few. | ||
| Not very many. | ||
| But mostly, our harshest punishment is locking them in a small cell where they can't see the sky, where their food is delivered through the bars, often by immigrants, from the commissary, which is the Uber Eats of prison, where they have to sit cut off from nature and in solitude For years. | ||
| Well, that's the life of your average Democratic voter. | ||
| Solitude, isolation, cut off from nature. | ||
| Who are the people who oppose this? | ||
| And some of them are Republicans. | ||
| You're not going to hear me say word one in support of the Republicans, by the way, who have collaborated in the most dishonorable possible way with The Biden administration. | ||
| So instead of saying Republican, I will describe them as anyone who's not with the program, which is the majority of people in my country. | ||
| Where do they live? | ||
| And more important, how do they live? | ||
| Well, they're poorer generally on paper. | ||
| But are their lives worse? | ||
| If you live in a place where you can see the sky? | ||
| Where you can make your own food and maybe even know where it comes from? | ||
| If you can go outside and say, identify three species of trees, or hear birds, or experience silence, the rarest commodity in the modern world, silence, where you can hear voices that aren't being broadcast from NBC News or Google, maybe higher voices, those are the people who are not with the program. | ||
| People who have a daily experience of others, and who have a daily experience of nature. | ||
| And those people are much more likely to acknowledge a power beyond themselves and beyond their government. | ||
| And there's a reason for that, because they can see it. | ||
| When you're isolated in a cell, living, as the urban planners of the United States now refer to it as, in density, which is somehow supposed to be good for the climate or the world. | ||
| No, it's death. | ||
| It's enslavement, is what it is. | ||
| When you're living crowded, as you would on an industrial farm as a cow, or as a chicken in a pen, You are not liberated, you are enslaved. | ||
| And you can't think clearly. | ||
| And your reference points are gone. | ||
| And you can't see the stars. | ||
| And you can't see the trees. | ||
| You cannot see God's creation. | ||
| All around you, you see what? | ||
| Drywall and screens. | ||
| Made by other people. | ||
| People who don't mean you well. | ||
| And your ability to make clear judgments, to think clearly, to think rationally, goes away. | ||
| And the next thing you know, you're still wearing a COVID mask three years later. | ||
| And that's just the beginning of it, or the very tip of it, the COVID mask. | ||
| He's exactly right. | ||
| Prison planet, I guess you could describe it as. | ||
| I just love that quote from the beginning of that. | ||
| The people who run the U.S. | ||
| aren't even pretending to try to help the American people. | ||
| And if you look at what the government does, I mean, they're so giving. | ||
| They're so willing to invest in and encourage and help out everybody who's not American. | ||
| All the non-Americans, they get a hundred billion dollars there, a couple billion dollars there. | ||
| You want to scramble across our border? | ||
| Heck, take a $2,000 check and a plane ticket anywhere you want. | ||
| You want a house? | ||
| Again, at a certain point, you just go, what are we getting from this little arrangement? | ||
| You take my money, you impose regulations on me at every pass, But in some cities, you aren't even providing cops. | ||
| In Austin, if I call 911, I'm probably going to get put on hold. | ||
| And if I'm not in imminent danger of being stabbed or shot, they're not going to come. | ||
| Literally. | ||
| If you call the cops and say, hey, some guy just broke into my house and fled, they'll say, oh, he fled? | ||
| He's not there? | ||
| Well, get in line then. | ||
| We're not coming. | ||
| So what is it you do here exactly, right? | ||
| We need to have the office space conversation with our government. | ||
| Okay, so you're not protecting people. | ||
| You're actually letting criminals out of prison and allowing them to victimize citizens. | ||
| You're not protecting the border. | ||
| You're not keeping us safe overseas. | ||
| You're starting wars with nuclear powers over nothing. | ||
| So why should we keep participating in this little back and forth? | ||
| They seemingly exist, and at this point brag about the fact they exist, solely to exploit the American people in service of everyone else. | ||
| And the people that are American citizens, but despise our country. | ||
| They also are very generous with them as well. | ||
| Using your money, of course. | ||
| Let's go back out to your phone calls now. | ||
| We've got Chad in South Dakota, who actually has a response to Johnny's call about Denmark a little while ago. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Chad. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, Harrison, I just, after listening to the call, there was kind of some glowing defense or portrayal of Denmark as some kind of haven for free speech. | |
| Six days ago, we have this headline, Denmark buckles under pressure, moves to restrict speech that insults cultures and religions. | ||
| They actually just jumped to the head of the line in terms of, you know, being anti-hate speech. | ||
| And if we remember back in 2020, actually one of the leaders of the Well, you know, they call it the alt-right or the far-right. | ||
| It's actually just, you know, people who are common sense and want to deport all the mass migrants that they've shoved down the throats of the European continent. | ||
| His name was Rasmus Paladin and they threw him in prison for three months and disbarred him permanently and took away his driver's license because he made a couple of YouTube videos. | ||
| He was running for Parliament and they sent him to prison instead because he made a couple of YouTube videos in which he was insulting to Islam. | ||
| So, this business about, you know, I don't know who's trying to pump this It's a bit of a problem there too. | ||
| I guess what you're saying Chad is USA number one? | ||
| utopia Scandinavian countries being havens for free speech. | ||
| Not true. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Well, thanks for letting us know. | ||
| I mean, you do see it's more free speech than other European countries. | ||
| But, yeah, obviously there's a bit of a problem there, too. | ||
| I guess what you're saying, Chad, is USA number one. | ||
| Is that what I'm getting from you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I just, you know, I think America is the last haven. | |
| If anybody has some kind of misplaced notion about being able to go to Denmark or Norway, if things don't work out here, that's not going to be, we need to fix things here. | ||
| They're lining us up for the same stuff here, obviously. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Alright, well thank you very much for that, Chad. | ||
| Correcting the disinformation. | ||
| Spread by Johnny from Denmark. | ||
| We love Johnny from Denmark and maybe his lived experience is different than what Chad is pointing out. | ||
| But we appreciate all the points of view on this program and on this network. | ||
| Let's go now to... Thank you very much for the call, Chad. | ||
| Let's go to J.K. | ||
| in D.C. | ||
| You want to talk about the difference between disinformation and misinformation. | ||
| Lay it out for me, J.K. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You got it. | |
| Hello, Harrison. | ||
| So actually, that was misinformation that that other Danish caller called in about. | ||
| So I have the definitions and the distinction between misinformation and disinformation. | ||
| All right, you ready? | ||
| I'm ready. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| Misinformation is recklessly sharing inaccurate, harmful data without first checking its veracity. | ||
| So that caller, the example is, he wasn't trying to deceive you. | ||
| I don't think. | ||
| It was more that he didn't really check it. | ||
| Whereas your caller, you know, the previous caller to me actually knew more details about it and gave an example, right? | ||
| The headline. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And then disinformation is knowingly providing false or distracting slash deceptive data to cause harm. | |
| So misinformation is recklessly like, um, like, uh, uh, when people gossip, you know, they hear something and they just pass it on with check without checking first. | ||
| And then it hurts that person that they said that about and it wasn't true. | ||
| So that's being reckless and not checking the truth or the accuracy. | ||
| Whereas disinformation is doing it on purpose to hurt the innocent, to cause harm. | ||
| And both of them are nonsense labels applied to political speech or factual. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I'm giving you the dictionary definition, which could help, because, of course, there's a lot of mis- and disinformation about what those two words actually mean. | |
| That actually happens. | ||
| And so they use it as a weapon. | ||
| But if you know what the real definition is, in your position, as somebody who's trying to combat that, that could help if you had these definitions. | ||
| And I could send it These are dictionary definitions I could send to you if you want, or I could say them again. | ||
| No, I got them, I got them. | ||
| I'm always confused at which is which. | ||
| I just get confused at which is which. | ||
| So, I guess, maybe you can help me out here. | ||
| So, when Bank of America says that they cancelled the Christian charity for something other than religious beliefs, that is disinformation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Disinformation. | |
| That's disinformation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They know why they did it. | |
| But, the plausible deniability that it could have had an executive who didn't really know, and he was the one who was the spokesperson, right? | ||
| Interesting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They could have removed themselves, but somebody there knows why. | |
| And then misinformation, you can think about gossip. | ||
| You know, and misinformation is a little less harmful, right? | ||
| Yeah, I think, I think we should, I think that's a good, I think we should just replace misinformation with gossip. | ||
| So like, when they say we have a new misinformation, uh, you know, censor, they just say, no more gossip. | ||
| No, you have a, we have a gossip agency now that will, uh, determine whether or not your gossip is worthy of being spread. | ||
| I like that. | ||
| That makes it a little bit more clear, I think. | ||
| I don't, I don't even know if I'm joking anymore, JK. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know what's going on anymore. | |
| Well, think about reckless. | ||
| It's recklessly just passing it on, right? | ||
| You don't check it. | ||
| Right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Misinformation is a little lower level. | |
| Disinformation is CIA and spy world and, you know, saying things that they know aren't true to cause harm. | ||
| That's a little more serious. | ||
| So when Fauci comes out and says that there's no way that it could have come from a lab, even though he knows that it very likely did come from a lab, that's disinformation. | ||
| When the mainstream media outlets report what he's saying unquestioningly without looking into it, that would be misinformation. | ||
| You got it, Harrison! | ||
| You got Over half the world, but yeah, they're going to get off the Rothschild controlled, like central banks. | ||
| And then, yeah, I'm actually like pretty optimistic about it. | ||
| Like, I think that this is going to be the last, like Jackson Hole that just happened. | ||
| I think the federal reserve is going to be like gone. | ||
| All the central banks are going to be gone. | ||
| All the country's going to go to, I don't think that I know you're talking about the Fed now and all this ledger nonsense and all that stuff that's globalist controlled, but I think that they're still going to have cash. | ||
| I think it's going to be gold standard. | ||
| Like, coal, gas, oil. | ||
| Right, that's what they're talking about, yeah. | ||
| African countries are saying, I actually saw a speech from, I think it might have been Malema, or Malema or whatever his name is in South Africa, but, you know, he's going, you know, look at all of the minerals that we have under our earth, like, why don't we have a currency based on those, based on the, you know, projected output of barium mines or, you know, oil output. | ||
| Yeah, I think that is the plan, or at least in the discussions. | ||
| I think also gold, silver standard, even like Bitcoin in Turkey and El Salvador, they went to Bitcoin too. | ||
| So yeah, I kind of think of BRICS kind of like a trade system, kind of like SWIFT was. | ||
| But yeah, I think it's going to be, all the currencies are going to be going to the gold standard it's a yeah back there currencies well it is interesting and again we're in this sort of bad position where like it's a good thing that it's happening because you know the global control system relies on the hegemony and then the dominance of the american dollar but the same time it's not good for america actually to to be supplanted in this role it's | ||
| It's just, you know, there's a difference between America, the people, and America, the leadership. | ||
| So, it's very interesting developments taking place there. | ||
| We've been following it, thanks to, of course, Simon from Florida. | ||
| I'm going to go to Kevin in Minnesota. | ||
| Let's go to Kevin in Minnesota. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. | ||
| Kevin, you're on the air. | ||
| Hey, Harrison. | ||
| Oh, I'm sorry. | ||
| I'm on speakerphone. | ||
| Let me get off of that. | ||
| That's all right. | ||
| You sound pretty good still. | ||
| OK. | ||
| I'm going to go to Kevin in Minnesota. | ||
| Let's go to Kevin in Minnesota. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. | ||
| Kevin, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, Harrison. | |
| Oh, I'm sorry. | ||
| I'm on speakerphone. | ||
| Let me get off of that. | ||
| That's all right. | ||
| You sound pretty good still. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Well, just want to say kudos big time. | ||
| Long time listener, big time. | ||
| Before Alex. | ||
| Okay, doesn't matter. | ||
| I am so proud of you. | ||
| Am I still coming? | ||
| Oh yeah, I hear you fine, Kevin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, great. | |
| Your parents got to be so proud of you. | ||
| If not, I am not even digging. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| I only get 10 minutes of you, Harrison, a day due to my schedule. | ||
| Man, I have watched you grow. | ||
| You are awesome. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Oh, Harrison, man, you got it, man. | ||
| Royce White, I just want to kudos to Royce White today. | ||
| Yeah, I'm in Minnesota. | ||
| He knocked it out of the park. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh my goodness. | |
| It's just a damn privilege. | ||
| This is my second time getting in. | ||
| I love you guys so much. | ||
| God dang it, your broadcast tonight, just perfect. | ||
| I love you guys. | ||
| Kevin, I would love to let you just keep showering me with praise for the next few minutes. | ||
| I do want to get to other college, but thank you very much for your support, and I'm very blessed to have parents that completely agree with what I'm doing here. | ||
| I cannot imagine what it would be like trying to work at InfoWars and having some libtard parents. | ||
| That would be tough, but thank God. | ||
| Thank the Almighty. | ||
| My parents are perfectly in line with what I believe, so they are very proud and I'm very happy too. | ||
| Alex and all of InfoWars, and of course all the InfoWars listeners and viewers. | ||
| I mean, I was an Infowars consumer for decades, I mean, since middle school until I started working here. | ||
| And one of the beautiful revelations was that it really is the real deal. | ||
| And it really is a group of people, regardless of whether they're doing the switch or running the audio or uploading the videos afterwards, everybody in this office believes in the mission, believes in freedom of speech and the power of humanity and everything that Alex has talked about for so long. | ||
| So it really is a blessing beyond description to be able to just contribute in some small way. | ||
| Thank you so much for the call, Kevin. | ||
| I really do appreciate it. | ||
| And you only have 10 minutes on American Journal each. | ||
| Well, you got to wake up early and give us a call because I'd love to hear from you again. | ||
| Thank you for that. | ||
| Let's go to Dan in Nevada because you say you have a solution for Trump's legal problems. | ||
| Go ahead, Dan, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey Harrison, how you doing? | |
| Good, thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, it's a page out of Hunter Biden's attorney playbook where they threaten to call Joe Biden into the witness stand if they put Hunter on trial. | |
| Trump should do the same thing. | ||
| Have Joe Biden, I don't even think they're going to want him there to be honest with you, but have Joe Biden Sit down at the stand and then ask him, do you believe this election has been stolen or fraud or any kind of deceit in this election? | ||
| Of course not, he's going to say. | ||
| Then you play that video of him bragging how him and Obama had the most fraudulent election. | ||
| And then you play the video and say, Mr. Biden, what did you mean in this video when you made this statement? | ||
| Oh, come on, man. | ||
| Oh, come on, man. | ||
| That would be great. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| No, I wonder, man, there's, you know, it's times like this. | ||
| You just, you wish you had a real, like, Saturday Night Live. | ||
| I mean, the amount of comedy that could come about just showing, like, a skit of the courtroom. | ||
| They're calling Joe Biden to the stand. | ||
| He's falling asleep. | ||
| He's tripping on the way up there. | ||
| Hunter Biden is, like, trying to score coke from the lawyers in the back. | ||
| I mean, it would be a very funny thing if it wasn't our country being stolen right in front of us. | ||
| That is an interesting card that Trump could play. | ||
| Yeah, instead we get like whatever this is. | ||
| God even knows what they're doing in SNL. | ||
| Thank God for the writer's strike. | ||
| That's all I have to say. | ||
| That's about going to do it for us this Sunday evening, folks. | ||
| I'm sorry to the callers I wasn't able to get to today. | ||
| Thank you to the callers who made it through. | ||
| Fantastic stuff. | ||
| Thank you to everybody who supports everything that we do here. | ||
| After all, this show and the Alex Jones Sunday Show, this is just like the The cherry on top of the information Sunday we like to serve you each and every week from American Journal in the Mornings to the Alex Jones Show to the War Room to all of the great creators at Bandod Video. | ||
| I know I speak for all of them when I say thank you for your support. | ||
| Thank you for going to infowarestore.com. | ||
| Thank you for keeping us on the air and in the fight. | ||
| As you've seen, we've laid out today, free speech is on the chopping block, but we will preserve it with your help and with God's will behind us. | ||
| I will actually I've been shadowbanned. | ||
| I've been called a liar. | ||
| I've been silenced on virtually every platform created by man. | ||
| My life has been threatened, repeatedly. | ||
| They've tried to destroy me, but I've survived. | ||
| I've been shadowbanned. | ||
| I've been called a liar. | ||
| I've been silenced on virtually every platform created by man. | ||
| My life has been threatened repeatedly. | ||
| They've tried to destroy me, but I've survived. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's why I'm joining Mug Club. | |
| The replatforming begins now. | ||
| Join Mug Club and get one month free with promo code ALEX at jonescrowder.com. | ||
| I need financing to fight the globalists. | ||
| Plus, we've got great products you need. | ||
| These are historic. | ||
| They're one-of-a-kind. | ||
| We sold out of Alex Jones for President shirt. | ||
| Told you, these are all limited editions now. | ||
| And we have a few of the Political Prisoner original mugshot, which is not the real mugshot, that you can get at infowarestore.com for $17.76. | ||
| But what we do have being printed right now Is the real Trump mugshot, Never Surrender t-shirt. | ||
| And on the front, it says Trump 2024. | ||
| On the back, it says Never Surrender. | ||
| That's what he said yesterday. | ||
| Infowars.com. | ||
| So Trump 2024 in black and white and in gold with Never Surrender on the back. | ||
| And that's a designer shirt, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| High quality fabric, high quality printing. | ||
| So when we're selling these for $17.76, we paid like 15 bucks for these. | ||
| So we're just selling that one almost at cost. | ||
| It's almost gone. | ||
| So the original limited edition political prisoner shirt that is not the accurate mugshot, something we came up with when they were originally going to do it, didn't. | ||
| Then we now have the real mugshot. | ||
| And if you want those, they're being printed right now. | ||
| Anybody tells you you've got the shirt that isn't a two-week wait is full of it. | ||
| We put the order in this morning. | ||
| They'll be done in about a week and a half. | ||
| They're making them right here in Texas. | ||
| They'll be shipping out. | ||
| So get your orders in now and get a piece of history. | ||
| Trump 2024 in black and white. | ||
| The real mugshot. | ||
| Never surrender on the back. | ||
| Infowars.com. | ||
| And we have the gold one as well. | ||
| I think the gold one will be the most popular, but we will see. | ||
| All three shirts now available. | ||
| The original, ready to ship. | ||
| Limited edition, about to sell out. | ||
| And we also have a flash sale of X3. | ||
| Limited supply came in. | ||
| And Vitamineral Fusion. | ||
| Both are selling out very, very quickly. | ||
| But despite that, they're 40% off. | ||
| That's what finances this operation. |
Export Selection