All Episodes
June 28, 2025 - Freedomain Radio - Stefan Molyneux
03:29
Free Will and Determinism
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right.
Explain.
Oh, sorry.
If free will doesn't exist, should we somehow, so it should, sorry, should we nonetheless act as though it does?
Well, a free will, I mean, the word exists is, right?
My phone exists, my hat exists, my shirt exists.
They exist independent of my consciousness.
And we can check that through the consistent behavior of matter and, you know, sense evidence testing.
Logically consistent and sense evidence testing is how we know something exists.
A free will is an effect of consciousness, right?
Does gravity exist or is gravity an effect of mass?
Well, gravity doesn't exist independent of mass.
And like where there is no mass around, there is no gravity other than very, very faint, blah, blah, blah.
So a concept doesn't exist in the same way as that which it describes does exist, right?
There's a concept called a crowd, but a crowd is just an aggregation of individual people.
There's no such thing as a crowd.
When the people disperse, there's no such thing as the crowd left as a remnant, right?
So free will is a concept or a description of human consciousness, and the description is, free will is our ability to compare proposed actions to ideal standards, which is morality or efficiency or so on, right?
Or it could be something like business goals and so on.
Our proposed actions, we have the ability to compare proposed actions to ideal standards.
Now, does that ability exist?
No, it doesn't exist.
Consciousness is an effect of the brain.
It's a description of the biochemical and material effects of neurons in the brain.
A forest, as a concept, does not exist independent of the trees.
It is a description of the trees.
So free will does not exist independent of human consciousness.
It does not exist as a material entity in its own right.
But free will is a valid concept.
So if you have two bananas, you add two more bananas, you now have four bananas.
But the number two, the number two, and the number four are not somehow attached to the bananas.
They don't exist in an independent state.
They are conceptual descriptions of what is occurring in the world.
So conceptual descriptions are valid or invalid.
They do not exist independent of our minds.
So is free will a valid concept?
Sure, yeah.
Do we have the ability to compare proposed actions to ideal standards?
Absolutely.
We certainly have the ability to create ideal standards.
Something like tell the truth or do not aggress or be courageous and so on.
So we have the ability to propose ideal standards or to have ideal standards.
Can we compare our proposed actions to ideal standards?
Sure, we do it all the time.
Should I, shouldn't I?
Should I have this piece of cheesecake?
Should I go exercise?
Should I tell the truth?
Should I, whatever?
Should I be mean?
Should I succumb to temptation?
So we have ideal standards and we can compare our proposed actions to ideal standards all the time.
This catches the determinist who says you should be a determinist.
In other words, you should compare your proposed actions called continuing to believe in free will or act as if you have free will.
You should compare your proposed actions to an ideal standard called determinism.
So this formulation of free will, which is valid, rejects determinism as a self-contradictory argument.
Export Selection