Dec. 16, 2024 - Freedomain Radio - Stefan Molyneux
06:01
When to Give Up on Your Dreams
|
Time
Text
Alright.
Steph, says someone, a lot of successful people have a story where at the beginning they were ignored and rejected and people told them they weren't good enough or that their thing will never work.
But they continue to work hard despite all of that until ultimately they achieved success.
I think you also mentioned that you have been ignored when you first started this show.
My question is, how do you know if you should keep trying or whether it's time to give up and move on to something else?
Thank you.
Yeah, that's a good question, right?
So there is the fallacy of sunk costs.
I did a business call about this recently with a guy.
There's the fallacy of sunk costs, which is, well, I can't walk now.
I've been waiting for the bus for two hours, right?
If you wait only 10 minutes and then you go walk, it's not so bad.
But if you've waited a couple of hours for the bus, it's pretty tough to go and start walking, right?
It's a fallacy of sunk costs.
You don't want to give up on your dreams, but at the same time, sometimes you do, right?
So, I was reading this thing the other day where this guy was saying that he was a really good actor even at the age of 17, but he was white, so he decided to give it up because there were a lot of auditions saying, you know, basically white males need not apply.
That's not good, right?
You know, denying occupations to entire groups, ethnicities or races, I mean, denying occupations is just a way of lowering the birth rate for that group.
It's kind of targeted, and obviously it's kind of sinister, to put it mildly.
So, I liked acting, but I really disliked the theater environment, and I really disliked most of the actors, and I also quite disliked a lot of the directors and the teachers, and we just...
We were just not copacetic.
We were not simpatico, as it were.
And similar with academia, and similar with the publishing industry, and so on, I had a really great mentor.
A fairly famous Canadian writer was my mentor.
And I actually quite liked her.
But...
Or him.
But, yeah, the publishing industry was just...
It's not about the pursuit of deep human truths.
It's about the programming of people for the sake of ideology, and I can't stand that.
I just can't stand being around people who deny truth for the sake of ideology.
It is so manipulative, and to me it's kind of sociopathic.
It's the pretense of truth and honor for the sake of exploitation and consuming people.
Consuming people.
I think it's kind of repulsive.
So, is it knowing when it's time to give up and move on?
So, for me, it is hard to improve upon that which does the maximum good for the world.
It's hard to...
Improve on or do better than with my time, life and energy.
It's hard to improve on or do better than that which does the most good in the world.
So could I have done good in the world through art, through playwrights, through being a playwright or an actor or a novelist or a poet, say, all of which I put my hand into?
Well, I could have done some good that way for sure.
Could I have done some good in academia?
Yeah, I think I could have done some good in academia.
Could I have done some good in the business world?
I mean, I know that I did.
But there's no more good that can be done than direct moral philosophy.
This is virtue not by proxy, not by inference, not by art or sophistry.
It is the direct promotion of virtue out there into the universe forever and evermore.
So, for me, given that, I think that the achievement of excellence in the pursuit of virtue is the highest calling.
I'm kind of with Aristotle on that.
I can't do better than...
Promoting virtue directly to a worldwide audience.
There is no better way.
I mean, even if you look at that Taylor Swift thread, and I remember doing this math, so given the number of people who saw that Taylor Swift thread, and it was probably majority women, certainly the replies were majority women, I did a rough calculation, and 60,000 babies were born as a result of that tweet.
So that's larger than a village, smaller than a town.
So that's a small town's worth of people that comes out of one tweet, because I goosed women into deciding to have children by reminding them that their eggs are dying on the vine.
So if you can make a tweet and make 60,000 people...
That's pretty good.
And 60,000 people that are probably born two people who care about the future and just had been propagandized, right?
You can't really do better than that.
Of course, I think of being a massive pronatalist myself.
The number of children who've ended up being born, I mean, I know of many, many marriages, and certainly I get the emails all the time, hey, we decided to have kids, we got married here.
So the amount of people that philosophy has summoned into existence, I mean, I can't outdo the, what, Billion abortions, but we can certainly do our part to bring better, more reasonable, more rational life into the world as a whole.