All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 14, 2020 - Freedomain Radio - Stefan Molyneux
01:07:38
CUTIES!?!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good night everyone. Today I'm here with Stefan Molyny.
Stefan Molyny, he has like 15 years of YouTube, 3700 videos, billions of comments, over 300 million views, user number four.
So what happened? Stefan?
Well, I mean, I don't know.
Obviously, I have my suspicions.
But yeah, I was on YouTube from 2006 to 2020.
An election year.
I'm sure that's just a complete coincidence.
But yeah, an account in good standing.
And then next thing you know...
Just kind of yeeted straight off the platform.
No appeal, no warning, no identification of what the issues were.
And yeah, it's a pretty brutal way to be treated.
And I've landed, of course, on other platforms that I have been working with in the past.
LBRY or Library. There's BitChute.
I'm on Dailymotion. Brighteon.
You can find me in lots of places.
And for those of you who want to still follow what it is that I do, which I'm still doing, and I think even better.
I'm the kind of guy, like...
I'm like a muscle. Resistance breeds strength.
So if I get deplatformed from various places, and it's been quite a few places over the last year or so, then I'm like, okay, I just have to get better at what it is that I'm doing.
And although I always feel like I have my pedal to the metal, I guess you can push through the base of the car and go even faster if you need to.
So for people who still want to follow me, and I hope that you will, you can just go to freedomain.com.
I've done over 600 interviews with just about everybody in the known universe from Noam Chomsky to Jordan Peterson.
I was on Joe Rogan three times.
There's a whole bunch of And that was just personally.
I also went on the show three times as well.
And so, yeah, people can follow me, freedomain.com.
And there's videos, there's podcasts.
You can click on Connect to follow me on social media, the remaining peninsula outposts of freedom that social media still affords.
I'm on Minds. I'm on... Gab, I'm on Pocketnet, I'm on, gosh, Locals, I'm, you know, just about every telegram.
And so yeah, I hope people will continue and the conversation continues as it has been doing pretty well so far.
Yes. Another thing I noticed, for example, you had almost 1 million subscribers on YouTube.
Now on BitChute, it's less than 100,000.
Do you think people are too lazy to open an account on another platform?
Or do you think it's still worth it to fight for people that don't even manage to take some time to open an account?
It takes only, I don't know, a minute, two minutes.
Well, you know, it's a humbling thing, and it's really, really important.
I mean, I've been out here in the public square 15 years, and not to toot my own horn too much, but I have taken risks in the topics that few other sane people have discussed.
I think that's really important.
It's not run by entirely wonderful, great, moral, and virtuous people.
And therefore, whatever they forbid you to talk about is probably something that is the most important to talk about.
And whatever they permit you to talk about is probably not going to matter that much in the long run.
So I'm kind of drawn like a Tennessee Williams heroine to a brutal man or a moth to a flame.
I'm drawn to these taboo topics because I feel that's the responsibility.
Like if you know how to do the Heimlich maneuver and some guy's choking on a piece of halibut, get up and go and help the guy.
You know, it's just kind of a reasonable thing to do.
So I have been doing all that stuff and taking a lot of risks, you know, professionally and of course personally with, you know, going to speak and getting threats and bomb threats and all that kind of stuff.
And yeah, I mean, I do encourage the audience that if you followed me on YouTube, I mean, it's not, I'm just, I'm one house over. You know, I'm one house over.
And it's sort of like if you have this girlfriend and you're like, baby, baby, you're the best, you're the greatest.
And then she moves one house further away and you're like, no, that's too far.
That's just too far for me to come.
So I do invite people, you know, go to freedomain.com forward slash connect, freedomain.com forward slash videos, and you can get...
All kinds of great stuff.
I'm continuing to do the work that I do.
I'm continuing to do the call-in shows and so on.
So I hope that people will check out what I'm doing and not give me the rather sour taste in my mouth of being the lady that everyone treasures.
But she added one extra digit to her phone number, so now it's just not worth calling anymore.
So yeah, you can just go to bitshoot.com.
You can go to LBRY.com.
Brighteon, you can go to locals, a bunch of places, and you can go to fdrpodcast.com to get my podcast.
Sorry, I don't want to sound like a ticket tape of advertising, but yeah, just come on by and the work continues.
It's okay. You know, I think, I don't know if you think the same, I think it was the videos you talk about George Floyd can be the reason why you were banned.
What do you think? Oh, yeah.
I mean, so the video that was in the queue that was about to be published was myself talking with two police officers, one ex-police officer.
I think they were both ex. So it was a black cop and a white cop, and we were going through George Floyd, the pluses and the minuses.
And, you know, like everyone, you see those initial videos.
You know, I can't breathe, and the cop's on his neck staring coldly into the camera, and you're like, oh, man.
Maybe this fabled mirage of absolute police brutality that is unrestrained and racist and brutal, and maybe it is finally, you know, like if you're in the desert and you keep running towards these mirages and it turns out to be just an illusion, maybe this time it's a lake, maybe there is really one out there in the Sahara.
So I saw that, and then I sort of sat and thought about it, started looking at the evidence, and it's like, you know, I really don't think that a bunch of cops are just going to kill a guy when everyone's got their cell phone on them, and they're wearing body cameras, and, and, and.
And now, as you've seen, there's talk of him having swallowed drugs in a prior arrest.
There was, of course... Fairly high, if not downright lethal doses of fentanyl in his system, methamphetamines and all of that.
And man, it's pretty brutal.
And this is the guy who jammed a gun into a...
Woman's pregnant belly during a house raid, looking for money and drugs in the past.
And, you know, the guy had hypertension.
He had significant heart ailments.
He complained that he couldn't breathe even before they tried to...
Even when they were trying to get him in the car, he fought and resisted and went rubber bones.
And they were trying their very, very best to get him into the car.
Like, hey, man, if you're claustrophobic, no biggie.
We'll turn on the air conditioning.
We can roll down the windows.
We'll make it as comfortable for you as possible just to get him to the station and...
You know, it's a tough gig, man.
I have my issues with the police, but it's a tough gig, man, because...
The deal is you've got to go with the cops.
That's the deal. Like when I was in Hong Kong and the phalanx of stormtroopers from the state came rolling down the road after I took a couple of facefuls of tear gas, I'm like, yeah, I know the nature of the state.
That's the deal. You comply or you die.
They will escalate until you comply or you die.
That's the deal with the state. And George Floyd, having been arrested before, having done time before, knows.
The deal, and he knew, of course, he knew that he was high.
He knew that he was driving.
He knew that he'd passed, you know, this wet, dripping wet counterfeit bill.
He knew he was going to the big house and wasn't going to see daylight until, well, quite a long time in the future.
Plus, you know, as I predicted early, again, not to toot my own horn, I predicted early that I bet you he said he had COVID. And this was back before everybody knew the fatality rate and everybody was scared, crapless of COVID. And yeah, he said he had COVID. He'd had COVID, which meant that they had to restrain him face away from themselves.
The procedure that they used, the knee on the shoulder, was actually introduced and maintained by a black police chief.
And it was the recommended way to deal with somebody who was going through...
This excited delirium state where people get so freaked out by being arrested, their bodies just shut down as a whole.
So, yeah, I mean, I've been working on this pushback against these race-baiting, police brutality, you know, black hunting cops.
Boy, all the way back from George Zimmerman and onwards, and I've been doing a lot of work on that kind of stuff.
I did it with, oh gosh, Big Floyd, right?
Sorry, Mike Brown.
I did it with Mike Brown and...
Yeah, it was a lot of work.
And they really, really need this narrative, right?
Because the black vote seems to be heading to the Republicans to a greater degree than in the past.
And it looks like the incipient Marxist revolutionary stuff that's coming out of Black Lives Matter is not sitting very well with the fundamentalist Christianity that characterizes a lot of the black community.
So yeah, they need to scare people back into the fold, I guess.
And this is how they're trying to do it.
Yeah, talk about Black Lives Matter.
What do you think about these peaceful riots?
Peaceful riots is very funny because sometimes I think they take the peace because you see buildings, buildings on fire behind you, people fighting, and the press say, like, it's peaceful.
Another thing, what about the Caio Writing House?
He was, he's in prison, he's in custody.
No, not in prison, in custody. And the guy who was shot in the arm is giving like a press.
No, the guy who was shot in the arm, I think, no, he's out.
The guy who was shot in the arm, it's the guy who shot him, right?
The 17-year-old kid?
So he's in custody, the other guy who shot?
Yeah, the guy, what, he shot two guys, killed two guys and shot this guy, blew 90% of his bicep away and so on and...
You know, time will tell.
The video evidence, you know, again, untutored, outside, non-cop, non-lawyer eye, you know, it looks like it could end up in the vicinity of self-defense.
It will take, of course, a jury and evidence and all of that to unpack all of that.
But I really don't like this rush to judgment from people who say that they're very much against lynching.
It's like, yeah, the whole point is you're supposed to withhold judgment until the facts come in.
And that's what a rational, peaceful, reasonable civilization does.
I saw a video.
I know exactly what happened.
We should string these people up, and they're guilty and guilty.
I mean, that's brutal.
That is not a civilized system.
We spent about 150,000 years Getting out of Hatfield versus McCoy, string them up kind of justice, which is not really justice, and having a rational set of rules to determine truth from falsehood and guilt from innocence.
And I mean, we let that go.
It was, well, it was kind of all for nothing and a lot of suffering went in to try and build this stuff up.
Perfect. The other thing is going on now, like, we are close to the election, but let's talk about coronavirus.
Like, some people think that's a real virus, another one think it's not real, it's a hoax.
The only thing, like, I know is going to be a lot of people is going to be in poverty, a lot of suicides happening, a lot of people with depression, panic attacks.
So, do you think it's justified to close the countries because of coronavirus?
Well, the sort of trick of understanding, I think, a rational argument, which is hopefully synonymous with my arguments as well, is something like this.
If the government does it, it sucks.
It sucks. And it's the entire wrong thing to do because the government operates on violations of the non-aggression principle.
The government operates by initiating the use of force.
So my position from the very beginning, and, you know, To be fair, I did call it a pandemic in January of this year.
So I knew pretty early on that, and this is based upon contacts I had in Hong Kong and other places who were sort of feeding me information.
I'm just the body of the spider, the legs of the information that's coming in.
But I was kind of keen on saying, until we figure out what this thing is, it's probably a good idea to avoid crowds, to wash your hands a lot.
A mask wouldn't kill you. But it's voluntary.
I never said the government should pass all these laws forcing people to do this, that, and the other, because the government is always overreached.
The government is always producing the opposite of what it says it wants to do.
So the government says, hey, we want to keep people safe.
From medical dangers and now, as you know, 10 times the number of people have died from not having regular access to healthcare that have died from COVID. So, of course, you know, I was like, hey, you know, flatten the curve.
Let's see what we're dealing with here.
But on a voluntary basis, on a voluntary basis, the way that pandemics should be dealt with in a free society is the airlines who fly people in from other countries should be liable for the resulting economic damage.
And it should be negotiated on a case-by-case basis.
You know, the malls may let you in or may not let you in without masks.
And you have this continual experimentation.
As soon as the government imposes a one-size-fits-all law...
Experimentation is over and now we have to cobble together experimentation from Sweden and Denmark and the UK and the US and Brazil and whatever the hell is going on over there in India and we're just going to kind of cobble things together but there are so many variables that it's really really tough to compare and so your people are trying to compare America to other places like Australia or New Zealand it's like They're kind of islands.
That's a big deal.
They have different demographics.
They don't have as fat a population.
You know, obesity plus COVID is a pretty deadly combination.
And I think America, outside of maybe one or two Pacific islands, is about the fattest nations on Earth.
And, you know, you get a bunch of Americans who do jumping jacks at the same time, you might knock us out of our whole damn orbit, right?
So this is a bad thing to compare to.
But because the government is largely imposing one-size-fits-all solutions, we don't get To experiment.
The fatality rate is pretty low.
The fatality rate is pretty low.
There are, of course, a massive amount of comorbidities that together with coronavirus appears to be particularly deadly.
So there's lots that people can do to, you know, lose weight, exercise, get your vitamin D, keep yourself as healthy as possible.
None of this, of course, being medical advice.
But there's a lot that you can do to keep yourself safe and healthy and You know, I've always tried to look for the upside even of disasters like this.
So the upsides? Yeah, okay.
So the mass swirling...
Flow of endless human migration seems to be on hold for the time being, which is not the end of the world.
And we have up to 40% of people starting to look into homeschooling.
I'm a big advocate for that because the mental leftist straitjacket of toxicity being lashed around the bodies of tender young children is pretty horrendous and could have them going kind of crazy for the rest of their lives.
So there's a lot of things going on about that.
So, you know, try and find the upside.
But no, I don't think it's a hoax.
I do believe that it was either brewed up or developed or, you know, in the lab in Wuhan, you know, the fact that in a giant, giant country, a virus happened to emerge within a stone's throw of China's only bio for weapons lab seems to me a coincidence that stretches credulity.
But I think it was a real thing.
I think that China is completely getting away.
We're facilitating its escape from China, and it's just amazing.
Social media companies pick on someone like me because I'm just a podcaster with three chords of the truth, but China releases a worldwide pandemic that people believe killed close to a million people.
I accept those numbers, and everyone's like, well, but it's racist to say that it's a Chinese virus.
It's like, okay, you can see very clearly where power lies in this world.
They don't talk about China anymore.
It's been quiet about China.
We don't know what's going on there.
The other thing is they talk about the vaccine now.
They are doing the Oxford vaccine.
I think a couple of days ago there was a problem, but now it seems like the investigation seems okay.
What do you think about the vaccine?
For example, me, if I had the option, I wouldn't have the vaccine.
You know, it's a tough call.
It's a tough call. It's about 10 years to make a vaccine normally.
Now, I think that the government is a bit hyper-cautious with this kind of stuff.
I had a doctor, a research doctor on my show years ago named Mary Ruart, who even 10 years ago was calculating that the FDA had killed about 5 million Americans by not allowing drugs into America that were perfectly legal and safe in other countries.
So I think there's too much caution in the development of vaccines to begin with, but...
It's rushed. I mean, it's 10 times rushed.
And that either means that it's 10 times less safe or...
It's way too slow to get things done elsewhere.
So, you know, it's interesting, you know, if there are a bunch of people who need some sort of medicine, well, the FDA will delay that forever, it seems, until it's perfectly safe.
And that means it's so expensive to produce that you don't even try and solve smaller markets of illnesses.
But now with this one, suddenly it's like, oh, this affects the tax receipts of the government.
This affects the elites.
Oh, my gosh. Well, let's hit the gas and get this thing done.
Through, and, you know, there are, for most vaccines, there's a significant number of people who have pretty adverse reactions, and that is going to So I remain skeptical about the safety and if I have my choice, I'm not lining up.
I'm not going to be first in line for anti-COVID 1.0 because the other thing which people are just focusing on the mortality rates, which is pretty low.
But the issue seems to be for a lot of people, they're called the long haulers, right?
So you get COVID and it knocks you on your ass for a week or two or three.
A friend of mine I just did a show with, he's been out off and on for a couple of weeks.
But, you know, everybody's had a flu or most people have had a flu.
Yeah, it knocks you on your ass for a week and then you kind of crawl your way back out the other side of the world and you rejoin your life.
But for a lot of people, there is this long haul issue where they're testing negative.
But because this thing has these brutal, you know, like superintendents have these master keys that can open up all apartments in a building.
And COVID has one of these master keys that can help it to penetrate cells all throughout the human body.
Which is why you're getting heart issues, which is why you've got kidney issues, which is why there are brain fog issues.
And some people, it just seems to get in there and sit there like herpes, you know, like AIDS. And it's pretty rough.
That's the part, just personally, that's the part that alarms me the most.
You know, I'm not in a particularly high-risk group.
I'm not super old.
I'm not overweight.
I work out.
I'm healthy. I do my bike machine and all that.
So I'm Not too worried about any kind of fatality.
What does concern me, though, which is almost like a fate worse than death in a way, particularly for me, because brain fog to me would be just about the worst thing.
It's my most prized, well, I could say my second most prized organ.
So to me, the issue is, man, what if you get something that just kind of hooks into your system and just...
Hangs out, you know, like a squatter, like, you know, Michael Keating in Pacific Heights, you know, just kind of hangs out there and you can't get a good old eviction notice.
That, to me, is the concern.
And, of course, as I said from the very beginning, the real issue is, the real virus is socialism or communism or state control.
Coronavirus is just how it spreads.
Yeah. This is a question here from Naked Traitor.
Stefan, to what degree this pandemic is a social engineering exercise?
Well, it'd be nice if it was just an exercise, because an exercise is something that doesn't actually happen.
You know, a military exercise is not something that you actually go and shoot people for real.
So, if it was just a warm-up or an exercise, Yeah, it'd be okay.
But, you know, I got messages from people in Melbourne, Australia.
They're in, like, 23-hour lockdown.
It's like a prison. You go an hour outside for exercise.
If you're more than five kilometers away from home, you need a note.
You need a reason to be out there.
And it's like, it's brutal.
And you got Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand, a bit of a foe of mine, going back to when I tried to give speeches in New Zealand a year and a half ago, two years ago, I guess now.
She's locking down significant parts of New Zealand because five cases shot up, right?
So, you know, the problem is, see, if this virus had come from Russia, you know, you've got to think about how this stuff plays out, right?
Let's imagine that this virus had come from Russia.
Well, the Western media, for a variety of reasons, well, they loved Russia when it was communist, and they hate Russia now that it's nationalistic and pretty Christian and all of that, right?
So, If this virus had come from Russia, there'd be great temptation to let it run like wildfire through the population and then get really, really mad at Russia and get everyone enraged at Russia so you could put sanctions on and seize assets and freeze bank accounts and just really gut the Russian economy, just get really, really mad at Russia.
But because, of course, there are so many leftists, communists and socialists in the media and academia and Hollywood and so on, they don't want people To get too mad at China, especially because the left has been cozying up to China.
You look at sort of Biden and his son and all the business he's been doing over there.
The left has kind of been cozying up to China as the last great communist country, just as previously to the fall of the Berlin Wall and so on, they cozy it up to Russia.
So I think that they're like, we'll let it start up and then we'll clamp it down.
And they just don't want too many people to get sick because at some point people are just going to get really, really angry.
At China, which, you know, they should.
China broke its most solemn international treaties by not reporting the danger of the coronavirus, denying human-to-human transmission, harassing and locking up doctors who were trying to talk about it.
You know, Taiwan was telling the World Health Organization that China knew there was human-to-human transmission, and they were shouted down, and the World Health Organization completely faffed things up.
Well, you've got a revolutionary Marxist in charge.
It's not going to be a very viable organization.
I mean, it's really a lot about protecting the reputation of communism and leftism because, you know, this is a really, really bad thing that's happened.
It's one of the most significant events in modern world history.
One of the most significant events in modern world history.
All you can talk about is how do we deal with this mystery ghost virus that just somehow emerged and is among us.
Nobody's ever following the bloody footprints back to Beijing.
Yeah. Change the subject a little bit.
Joe Rogan, in his Spotify, seems like he removed your episodes.
Do you know about that?
Yeah, I do know about that.
So what do you think about that?
I mean, it's not surprising.
It's not surprising to me at all.
Again, I don't know the details about the deal, but Spotify has significant – they work significantly with Tencent, which seems to have some pretty significant ties to the Chinese government.
So I got – I think one of the reasons I got into trouble on YouTube and other platforms...
See, China is a huge market, obviously, right?
You know, a billion people or whatever it is these days.
And it's a huge market. And so people who criticize China, what does China do?
Well, China... It says don't do that, right?
And when China says don't do that, it's not like it's a free market over there.
So, you know, that sort of matters.
And so I remember, I mean, I did, as you probably heard, I did a documentary on Hong Kong, March with the Protesters and all of that.
And you couldn't find that.
Like, it was ghost town, man.
It had been 1984 down the memory hole almost the moment I published it.
You could search for the exact title and just not...
So yeah, there was a significant amount, I think, of effort to not have that.
And of course, the more right I am, or to be more accurate, the more right philosophy is, the philosophy that I talk about, the more right that I am, the more...
I mean, on Joe Rogan's show, I talked about the dangers of engineered bioweapons and the threats of engineered bioweapons.
I do a show talking about the dangers of communist China to the world and, you know, It was like a month after I left Hong Kong that the virus started to spread.
So, you know, I looked pretty prescient as far as all of that goes.
And so because I'm a wait-for-evidence-and-reason kind of guy, I will often run in the opposite direction of the crowd who is just being managed by propaganda and being Geppetto puppeted all over the known intellectual landscape by a bunch of people who are trying to just gin them up to achieve particular political goals.
So I'm often running in the opposite direction to the mob.
That it takes a while for the mob to turn around and realize that waiting for reason and evidence and knowing your history is kind of an important thing.
So yeah, I talked about the dangers of China.
I talked about the dangers of bioweapons and genetically engineered weapons and so on.
And so the fact that Joe Rogan is over on a platform that's not On the opposite side of the planet as Chinese power interests, yeah, I mean, of course they're not going to want to take me across.
I can completely understand it.
Yeah. And when I think about it, do you believe there's going to be a global economic reset?
Well, tell me what you mean by reset.
I want to make sure we're talking about the same thing here.
To be honest, it's kind of conspiracy.
I don't know. Something about the whole economy is going to collapse.
It's going to start from zero. I'm not sure, but this is one of those conspiracies they talk about early.
Well, it's not a conspiracy.
It's math. It's absolute, completely, and it's total math.
So... I mean, I've said this before, every human life on this planet is backed up on average by $30,000 American dollars in debt.
You know, we've been borrowing from the future.
We've been selling off the unborn to international banksters for...
Ever, really, but certainly since the welfare warfare state arose in the 1960s, it's just been completely and totally brutal when it comes to how we're treating the unborn, how we're treating our children.
I mean, in many countries.
In the West, a child is born to about a million dollars in debt.
And unfunded liabilities are 12, 13, 14 times the U.S. economy, even before the economic clawback of the COVID-ravaged economy.
So it's not good.
It's not good.
Life depends upon resources.
We all know that. You've got to eat, you obviously use a fair amount of hair gel, and not so much except for maybe one armpit.
So all life requires resources.
And how have we been getting these resources?
Well, we've been borrowing, and we've been printing money, and we've been deferring payback by selling bonds and all this kind of toxic garbage that enslaves the next generation.
And so we have human life that is dependent upon debt.
Now, I've never been that much in debt, but I have had once or twice in my life where I needed to live pretty lean.
And it's, it's pretty rough.
You know, it's, it's pretty rough.
I don't know if you've ever had this where you just like, yeah, yeah, I'll have half the sandwich now and half the sandwich tomorrow.
Yeah. Not even half, Stefan.
Not even half. I will smell the celery.
I will smell the celery today and call that a meal.
No, no. I mean, I certainly had it when I was a kid.
You know, my mom would go off on these trips and leave me with like, you know, five bucks for a week or two.
And I would be...
Well, I remember I would go to the mall, and for 10 cents, you could get a bucket of batter, you know, from the fish and chips place, you know, like the scrapings.
And it was not, you know, get some ketchup, and it turns into the greasiest, most disgusting meal that fills you up.
And you'd hang around at friends' places around dinnertime, and...
You know, they'd think they'd have a dog.
Your stomach would be growling so much.
And, you know, sometimes it would pay off and you'd get some food.
And other times you'd be like, well, you know, still in time, you should probably go.
I'm like, really?
Okay. And then you go to the pizza place and see if they threw anything out.
I mean, it's pretty lean.
I had to live pretty lean sometimes when I was a kid.
And that's rough, and we're not used to that.
Because any problem you get, you just throw money at it.
You just print money and throw money at it.
As some group that's not doing well, hey, let's just borrow and print a bunch of money and fire it at them like you're firing Germans over the border in Soviet Russia.
It's from a cannon. And so we have all of this debt and all of these unfunded liabilities, and people are getting the sense That we are not anymore a generation away from the reckoning, right? The reckoning is, you know, it's like the old saying, it's in, I think, a Hemingway novel, they ask a rich guy who was super rich and then it's like, how did you, you ended up bankrupt?
How the hell did you end up bankrupt?
And he said, very slowly, then very quickly.
And that's like, you know, like smokers or ill health, you know, like, how did you get sick?
Kind of slowly and And then all at once, you know, everything just falls apart.
So because everyone's aware that, you know, it's like if you have a big extended family in the Middle Ages and people start doing the math and they say, holy crap, man.
Oops. We may have miscalculated our food situation over the winter and...
It's pretty rough. We're not going to make it.
You know, we can't all make it. And then what happens is, you know, people start to look on each other and camaraderie begins to vanish and people get kind of sinister about it.
You know, it's like when there aren't enough lifeboats for people on the Titanic, people get a bit punchy, right?
And they get a little bit aggressive.
So I think everyone is kind of realizing deep down in their bones, whether they know it in an abstract sense or can quote the numbers, not too relevant.
Deep down in their bones, though, my friend, they are...
They're getting it. We're not going to make it.
We can't possibly pay this back and lean hard times.
Why is Game of Thrones so popular?
Because it's seven years of summer and then seven years of winter.
And we've had the seven years of summer of just printing money and borrowing money, and we're going to have seven years of winter.
Everybody knows that it's coming.
Everybody knows that it's going to be pretty rough.
Now, what happens then?
When you run out of money.
I mean, we've seen it happen a whole bunch of times throughout human history.
Saw it happen in the French Revolution.
Saw it happen in Weimar Germany.
We saw it happen in the Roman Empire towards the end when they completely corrupted the currency by mixing all kinds of toxic garbage into the formerly pristine gold and silver and copper coins.
And it's rough, man.
It's really rough. The problem is, of course, I'm sorry for the long speech, but the problem is that a leader needs to come along and say, Hello!
Wakey-wakey, everyone!
We've been living in a dream world!
We can't possibly continue in this kind of way, but we've become so frightened of reality.
No one's going to vote for him.
Well, that's the thing, right? It's the old thing that Socrates said about democracy is the guy offering you free candy is always going to get voted for and the guy who's offering you broccoli and exercise is not going to get voted for.
But anyone who comes along and says, yeah, you know, we can't do this to our kids.
We can't do this to ourselves.
We're going to have to tighten our belts.
We're going to have to live really lean, and it might take 30 years to get ourselves back on path.
But we've been so drugged by this endless money, and we've got this weird fantasy that resources are infinite.
And so, you know, just fire money to every conceivable human problem.
People are getting kind of uneasy because they know that that bill, you know, that bill is coming over the horizon slowly and it's a, you know, it's a pretty big-ass tsunami of a bill and our sandcastles ain't going to last.
Yeah. How do you prepare for that?
Like gold, bitcoins, food?
Yes. Those are all, I think, you know, get yourself some gold, get yourself some food, and get yourself some community.
You know, because one of the things that's happened with this We've got money like oxygen.
You don't sit there and say, hey, I hope I have enough air in my house today.
Unless you're in the space station, it's probably not that big a deal.
Or if you live with me, in which case, you probably get an excess of CO2 from my endless diatribes.
So we've got this weird thing where resources are like oxygen.
And to deny anyone resources is to deny them oxygen.
When was the last time the government basically said, yeah, that's an interesting idea, but we can't possibly afford it?
Because everybody knows deep down they kind of can in the short run, again, just create the money, print the money, borrow the money and all that.
So get stuff that actually has fixed value, that has objective value, that isn't just, you know, the ass-white fiat currency paper toilet scenario being pumped out by the central banks.
Get yourself a community because all of this money has allowed us to create this complete veneer of self-sufficiency.
You know, like you've got all of these atomic...
Or atomistic individuals living in these vertical ice cube trays of condos.
They don't know their neighbors. They don't know anybody around.
They just have friends all over town and so on.
Get to know your neighbors.
Get out of the cities.
It's probably not the worst thing in the world to start thinking about.
And get yourself some skills that aren't just typing.
You know, get yourself some skills that aren't...
You know, yelling at microphones on the camera and all that.
Get yourself some skills that can actually be productive should there be interruptions to the food supply, should there be interruptions to the value of money.
You're going to need some pretty good friends and you're going to need some pretty good skills and you're going to need some food that doesn't go off too quickly, in my humble opinion.
By the way, that's going to be my next question.
It's about, like, your device, because in the new normal economy now, what advice would you give to men?
Like, which kind of job, for example, to look for?
Yeah, I mean...
I mean, everybody has their particular bliss and skills which they can follow.
I love arguing and debating and researching and speaking.
I love computers and programming and all of that.
So this kind of coalesced pretty well for me in what it is that I do.
So you definitely have to do something that you love.
But success these days is simply defined by courage.
You know, you stand in the middle of the road, you're just going to get hit from both sides.
And so success these days seems to revolve around courage.
I mean, the ball's on you for having me on.
Good, man. Well done.
Good for you. Thank you very much.
Yeah, I hope it works out.
I'm very glad to be here.
No one believed that I would have come here, to be honest.
Well, no, I mean, I appreciate it.
You know, people who still come on my show, I appreciate that because, you know, they've done a fair amount to try and shred my reputation.
But so follow something that you love for sure, but be willing to take risks.
And if you don't pick a side, the side picks you in whatever conflict is coming our way.
You know, everyone can kind of get along.
When there's enough food and water in the lifeboat, it's when things start to run low that human conflict begins to swell.
I sort of hate to say it, but you're going to have to choose a side.
Freedom or tyranny, individualism or collectivism, reason or propaganda, evidence or...
Media, which is the opposite of evidence.
So, you're kind of going to have to pick a side and you're going to have to be courageous in that side and you're going to have to try and lure people or encourage people or charisma people into your side and portable skills are pretty important.
to expand your human capital, expand your capacity to negotiate, you know, and invest in quality relationships and don't accept garbage, trash people in your life.
They will drag you down.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience, as the old saying goes.
So shun low quality people, people who are exploitive, people who are mean, who are shallow, who are into drugs and promiscuity and just propaganda and, you know, empty-headed people are going to be extraordinarily dangerous when the roots of propaganda really take hold, because you can see that happening right now. empty-headed people are going to be extraordinarily dangerous when the People are, you know, getting pretty feral out there.
You know, a couple of generations of propaganda is really paying off for the destabilizers of the world.
So, you know, keep people around you that you would trust with your life because hopefully it won't come to that, but it might.
You better to be ready. Let's talk about homeschooling, peaceful parenting, and you write a book about parenting, yeah?
I'm just starting a book on peaceful parenting and I've got the sort of chapter headings down and I've started doing the actual text and I am enormously focused and dedicated.
You know, one of the first things I started doing and one of the first things that kind of got me in trouble was peaceful parenting, which is the argument that the non-aggression principle, which is do not initiate the use of force, applies first and foremost to children.
And I've been pushing back for many years about people's addiction to politics.
And hey, I say this as a bit of an addict myself, so I'm not sort of preaching from some mountain of perfection here, but we're all dragged into the soap opera of politics because it's so tempting and it's so engaging and it feels like you're doing something when you leave the battle between the...
It's the battle between the article and the comments section.
That's where the real battle is.
And it feels like you've got these political opinions and you argue with people and you post on Twitter.
And it feels like you're really, really doing something.
And I'm not saying it's not important.
It is somewhat important.
But where is it that most people experience the most violence?
It's in the home. You know, still the vast majority of children are hit in the world.
Still, in most countries, it's legal to hit children.
And so the violence that you will experience...
You'll experience violence in your life, assuming you don't go to prison.
You'll experience violence in two places, right?
Number one, the home on average.
And number two, government schools, right?
So you sort of homeschooling and peaceful parenting kind of go hand in hand.
So children are deserving of the greatest and deepest and most powerful protections that society has to offer because they're the only one of us that are in an unchosen relationship.
Like you have a child.
They didn't choose you.
Like you can choose your spouse.
You know, you and I are here doing the show together voluntarily.
You can choose all of this stuff for sure.
But children don't choose their parents.
And children don't choose their schools.
And they don't choose their teachers.
And they don't, at least until they get older, choose their subjects.
And even then it's a very limited choice.
So this is why our freedoms are falling away because we have a totalitarian structure for our children and then we expect them to wander out into the world, into the remnants of the free market and just be individualists and freedom lovers and so on.
But we have to train them in that.
From the very beginning. So I've been a stay-at-home dad now.
It's close on 12 years.
My daughter is almost as tall as my wife.
Not that my wife is very tall, but my daughter's kind of getting up there.
And I've never yelled at her.
I've never obviously hit her.
I've never punished her.
I've never sent her to bed without dinner.
I've never put her in a naughty corner or a naughty spot or anything like that.
We just reason with each other.
And she is...
A happy, wonderful, bright, brilliant, I think, person that I'm very honored to know.
And you have to parent, like, if you're...
Child had a choice of any father or any mother in the world that they would choose you.
And if you parent that way, I think you're setting yourself up for a lifelong joy and happiness in the relationship.
But if you abuse that monopoly power you have as a parent that your kids can't leave and they can't go anywhere and they can't really fight back and they can't call the cops.
And if you abuse that monopoly power, then I think you're setting yourself up for a pretty unhappy time Over time, particularly teenage years, right?
If you're rough on your kids when they're young, you know, they're getting bigger and you're just getting older.
And so when the teenage years hit, they're going to turn to their peers, they're going to turn to the internet, they're going to turn to the modern cults of collectivism to gain their identities, and it's going to be really, really rough.
So much of parenting is just preparing for the teen storms, and you've got to have that strong bond and that respect.
And if you have that, I think you can navigate it fairly well.
But if you abandon your kids to daycare, if you let the state raise them and indoctrinate them and so on, and because why?
Because you're I mean, particularly for women, like, why?
Because all you do is you go to work, strangers raise your kids, there's no continuity of values, and then you come home from work and you turn your paycheck over to the people raising your kids.
You haven't made any money, really.
All you've done is lost a child, or a few.
Okay. I'm not sure, but I think the last video I saw before you've been banned from YouTube, I think you were talking about against violence, against children.
Am I right? Well, I think technically the last video was my daughter had a turtle.
We had dug a little pond for her.
That was like the last live stream. Or maybe one before that, I guess.
No, I mean, it's very much a topic, you know, because I have, you know, I wouldn't say it's like the toughest job in the world, but it's a bit of a tough road to hoe because some of my listeners have been around for five, 10 or even longer years.
And some people are new.
So you have to kind of blend things like for the new people, you can't assume that they know all the backstory of your arguments, but you can't keep repeating them.
Otherwise, the people who've been around for a long time are going to wander off out of boredom.
But yeah, I definitely do keep touching on that topic because I simply know based upon the math that hundreds and hundreds of thousands of children are not being hit, are not being abused, are not being yelled at, are not being punished, are not being frightened.
As a result of the work that I've done, I mean, I've had countless experts on the show talking about the negative effects of child abuse and how bad spanking is and all of that.
So I've worked really, really hard, not just to make the moral arguments, but to bring the empirical science and data to bear on these facts as well.
So, you know, once you get it, it's like a real click moment where you're like, oh, I don't have to hit my child.
I don't have to yell at my child.
I don't have to frighten my child.
I don't have to bully my child.
You know, because we say to kids, what do we say to kids all the time?
We say, don't hit, don't steal, don't call names, don't be mean, right?
And then we do all of that to our kids.
It's a very confusing world for children.
Whatever you do, don't hit someone.
Oh, you hit someone? I'm going to hit you.
Because that's good, right?
And so it's very confusing.
And if we give children a consistent message and a consistent world to live in, they really flourish.
And if we confuse them, they just get baffled and belligerent.
Yeah. Talk about children.
I haven't seen that film, or I think the film is called Cuties.
Everybody talks about that.
Is that real, that they are using children to do twerking and stuff like that?
Is that... Because I don't even want to see it, to be honest.
So, I don't know what to say about it.
Well, I mean, I've heard about the controversy.
I have... I mean, like yourself, I try not to eat food That's got tire tracks on it.
And I try not to watch content that is just appalling and horrifying.
And I think it's a Congolese woman who came and wrote this movie and directed this movie.
And I don't know, man.
I mean, you've got people in the States calling for investigations into Netflix for distribution of child pornography.
And, you know, a guy I quite like, Scott Adams, he's a real free speech guy.
A real free speech guy.
And he watched some of it and he said, yeah, I'm a real free speech guy.
It's pretty hard to shock me, but somebody needs to go to jail for this.
And so I think it's absolutely appalling.
And it just shows you like the chain of...
Like the echo chamber, right?
That there's nobody in that whole process, right?
This whole process of, you know, you write a script, then you get your funding, then you cast your actors, and you get your distributors, and you go to film festivals, and then you sign a deal with Netflix.
Like this whole chain of people.
It doesn't seem like there was anyone who said, wait a second here.
Something's wrong. We are hyper-sexualizing 11-year-old children.
Now, the fact that my daughter is 11 is making this one hit pretty close to home.
But no one along the line says, hmm, no.
And of course, the Obamas are neck deep in with Netflix and other people and so on.
So it just shows they seem to be genuinely surprised that anyone could have a problem with this.
And I don't know, maybe it's the Congolese woman.
Maybe they say, well, it's not gross if it's diversity hired.
I mean, I don't know. I don't know what, because I don't know anyone who would get involved in anything like that.
I mean, you've got parents who are putting their kids up for these auditions.
Can you imagine what these auditions are?
Put on this bikini and twerk?
At what point did the parents say, hell no!
What are you doing? I thought we were selling some toothpaste here and you've got my woman shaking her ass like Cardi B on a trampoline.
Like, no thank you. Right?
So, like, nobody at the film festivals is like, I'm not putting that on the screen.
What are you, crazy? We can't normalize this.
This is horrifying. And the whole step from conception to it flowing into people's homes.
And nobody, it seems, raised the alarm along the way, which tells you just what a predatory echo chamber these people are in.
And to quote Mike Cernovich, you know, if it's a choice between cuties and Sharia law...
And then he quoted some Arabic phrase that I didn't understand, but I think I knew which side he came down on that.
So yeah, I don't know.
I don't know. It really is a different universe.
It's a different moral universe that this whole thing, like this isn't just someone who filmed it in her house with a phone, right?
I mean, I've made a movie before.
I'm not just the documentaries.
I've made a fiction movie and so on, right?
So it's really a big, complicated, expensive, massive team effort.
And nobody on the set is taking pictures and leaking them and saying, what the hell is happening?
This is not good. Like the whole thing just kind of barrels and slopes along and doesn't seem like anybody raised an objection.
I don't know how a society functions when you have lots of people saying, this is beautiful, high-moving art!
And other people are like, this is child pornography and people have to go to jail.
How the hell are you supposed to cohabit in the same country, the same culture, with these kinds of viewpoints clashing at each other?
To be honest, they use these boys, like drag queens.
They think that's normal as well.
They go to some street clubs.
I think they give money to them.
I don't think that's normal.
It's certainly questionable when it comes to long-term happiness, I would certainly say.
Yeah, it's interesting. People ask you, which kind of books do you recommend?
Besides yours, of course.
Yeah. Well, there's this great guy, Stephen Molyneux, a good friend of mine.
He's got some great books. So books that I recommend?
That's very interesting. No, yours as well.
We can talk about your books. No, no, no.
Yeah, I mean, look, you can go to freedomain.com.
My books, with the exception of The Art of the Argument, are all free, and you can enjoy them.
They're on audiobook and EPUB and HTML and all of that.
So books... Well, I'm a big fan of fiction.
And in particular, 19th century fiction, particularly Russian 19th century fiction, you know, your Dostoevsky's and Drogenev's and so on, although I never really got into Tolstoy.
I'm a big fan of E.M. Forster and his novels, particularly Room with a View, which is a beautiful book and interesting.
Dickens, you almost can never go wrong with Dickens.
He's such a charming and entertaining and engaging writer.
And, you know, just by the by, it's been pretty well established that people who read fiction gain an empathy.
Because what is fiction other than a chance to try somebody else's life on for size?
I am virtually a resolute and bitter enemy of modern fiction, which almost seems to be eternally a parade of dysfunctional, brutal, traumatized horrors passing as high art.
I mean, the Anne-Marie MacDonald stuff and Goldfinch and all that's just to me unbelievably brutal and toxic, I think, to happiness and mental health.
But it's kind of like movies.
You dip back a little bit in time and you can get some pretty wholesome stuff coming out of it.
And some of the dysfunctional novels...
Can be very good and very instructive.
I'm sort of thinking of J.D. Salinger as a catcher in the rye, which is a pretty good examination of the effects of childhood sexual abuse on adult personalities.
That can be instructive in the same way that doctors have to go through the medical journals with all the illnesses known to man so they can better heal people and so on.
There are some nonfiction writers that I enjoy and like quite a bit.
You know, a lot of the modern conservatives have really good books.
Ann Coulter's got some fantastic books.
In fact, just to put a minor pitch in here, the book Demonic and its description of the French Revolution versus the American Revolution by Ann Coulter is a very important thing to read right now.
I just say buy it and read it.
And if you're not a big fan of her as a whole, at least read the sections on I think that's probably where we're heading without some pretty strenuous intervention at the moment.
But yeah, I would say novels in particular are fantastic.
Well, my daughter and I just went through Animal Farm and we went through...
Lord of the Flies, which if you skip over the endless descriptions of how green sunlight passes across boys forever flipping their hair out of their eyes, it's actually a very good novel.
So yeah, I would say nonfiction from the conservatives is pretty good.
And if you dip back in time to some of the older fiction works, you can do really, really well.
Do you think it's impossible that different races and religions live in the same place?
Let's talk about Brazil.
Brazil is kind of like a melting pot.
But some people think that's not good because Brazil is quite violent and poor.
So what do you think about that?
So to me, as you probably know, I am an anarcho-capitalist, which means that I am for no government and a free market.
So if you look at different religions and different cultures and different races, I believe that we can live together in relative peace and harmony.
We do have to understand that there are group differences, which I've talked about in my show with regards to IQ and other issues and so on.
I mean, that's something to just understand.
You never would judge an individual by that, but when you zoom out to society, it can help explain some disparities.
It's not something we should accept as eternal, and it's something we should always try and work with to try and close the gap and improve things.
But we do have to have a starting point that's empirical and rational.
But in the absence of the state...
We have so much of a greater chance to get along.
So, European history, of course, you've got a couple hundred years of religious warfare.
Why was there religious warfare in the past in Europe and not so much in the present?
Although, whether there'll be religious warfare in the future in Europe seems highly likely.
And that's because there was a separation of church and state, that you could pursue your own religious convictions free of either the temptation to use the power of the state to inflict those opinions or arguments on others, or out of fear that other people were going to use the power of the state to force you to conform to their religious or out of fear that other people were going to use the power
And so we can get along well if we have free speech, if we have the separation of state and ideas, separation of state and economics, I think we can get along together quite well.
How things shake out with regards to that, there seems to be a lot of self-segregation.
You know, they call it the lunchroom test.
Places where diversity mandates are not enforced, things like churches and, you know, lunchrooms in schools and so on and prisons.
People tend to sort of cluster, you know, like, attracts like, or as Muhammad Ali said, you know, the bluebird flies with the bluebird and the blackbird flies with the blackbird and so on.
That's what seems to happen.
I think a lot of cross-pollination can be helpful, but people do kind of tend to settle into people kind of like themselves, for better or for worse, you know, but I think a lot of that can be mediated.
The conflicts that come out of that can be ameliorated, if not eliminated, by just...
Having a less powerful government, for sure, and eventually no government, and I think we'd get along in ways that we can't even imagine right now.
In the same way that, you know, after a couple of hundred years of brutal religious warfare, if you had said to Europeans, oh no, you'll be able to live together fine with different religions, like nobody would have believed you, but you just had to separate church and state, and lo and behold.
Yeah. One thing that people ask me about this is about, do you know the E. Michael Jones?
You know him? I do know.
I know of him.
I've not read his books, although I know that he's quite big on economics, if I remember rightly.
And I think he was banned from YouTube as well.
It would not shock me, I suppose.
Yeah. You know, people ask about Keanu.
What do you think about Keanu?
I'm sorry, I didn't quite get the word.
Oh, QAnon, sorry.
I'm not there.
I'm not down with the QAnon thing.
I have my concerns.
I mean, you can read more of Jack Posobiec about this.
He sort of claims to know the origin, and I trust Jack.
He's a A very good guy.
And so he thinks that the origins are not particularly valid.
But my concern with QAnon, even if it was valid, which I don't think it is, but is that, you know, there's this, they're going to take down the deep state, it's just going to take a while, and it's going to be this and it's going to be that.
And, you know, I think this gives people a sense of hope that just doesn't seem to be borne out in reality.
You know, I mean, the Mueller team, it just turns out that they just trashed, erased or, quote, forgot their passwords to airplane mode locked phones a couple dozen times.
And that seems pretty serious.
I mean, that seems like destruction of evidence to me.
I don't know if that came up in QAnon's predictions or whatever, but, you know, the deep state is fighting back pretty hard, as we know.
And so this idea that there's some big movement that's going to somehow pay off in the end, I'd be a little bit concerned that that's going to make people kind of complacent and think that something is happening for which there doesn't seem to be much evidence.
Yeah. One more question.
Stefan, we have close to one hour, so that's the last one.
Let's do two. Let's do two.
Great audience. So in Brazil, they start to have lots...
We have a kind of right-wing government.
I don't think it's right-wing, because people brand him like a right-wing, but it's kind of more like a left-wing.
So since he got in power, there are loads of new laws against men, like basic men...
Get more time in prison, etc.
What do you think about that?
Well, women outvote men.
I mean, they live longer, they vote more consistently.
And again, there are lots of exceptions to the general rules, as we know, but women as a whole generally prefer security to freedom, and men generally prefer freedom to security.
So when you have a more patriarchal society, it tends to turn more towards political liberties.
And when you have a gynocentric or female-dominated society, it tends to turn towards The welfare state.
And I mean, people have done in America very cogent analyses of voting patterns and female voting patterns.
And you can see just how government spending and debts and deficits exploded after women got the vote.
And so it's very hard to maintain economic liberties.
And of course, then as a result, political liberties, when you have Women voting.
Women are very good at consuming, as you know.
I mean, just go to any mall. I'm sure it's the same.
I've been to Sao Paulo. I've been to Brazil.
And it's the same there as it is everywhere else.
else.
You go to a mall and there's like 80 stores for women and two stores for men.
And one of those stores is men's fashions, which is driven by women buying stuff for them.
And the other one might be some computer store or something like that.
Right.
But it's a female centric consumer society.
I mean, 80-90% of consumer purchasing decisions are made personally.
So the modern economy is driven by female spending.
And I think a lot of it is complete crap, total waste, bric-a-brac, useless throat pillows, stupid heels that you can't do anything useful in, ridiculous pipe-stem dresses that don't give you any mobility, and useless frou-frou and frill-frills and blah, blah, blah.
And a lot of it is just...
Crap and garbage and useless and destructive to the environment and a massive waste of just about everything.
But that's the economy that we kind of have.
So governments, in order to maintain the economy that is...
See, governments don't like dislocations in the economy unless it destabilizes the American economy or the Western economies and allow the Marxists to expand.
But governments don't like reconfigurations of the economy because it interrupts the tax base, right?
So governments...
To maintain the flow, particularly of income tax and also of sales taxes and so on, governments need to get, by hook or by crook, as much money as humanly possible into the hands of women.
Because women don't save as much they like to spend, and that's the way the economy is set up, right?
So if you have something which flows money from men to women, Then things are great for the existing economy and the powers that be and the tax structure and so on.
Now, in the past, this used to happen because men made the money and turned over the majority of money to women who would spend money on the households and the kids.
And a lot of that is legitimate stuff.
Kids need dental care and clothing and toys and all of that.
And so you do two things.
Number one, you keep pushing for bigger and bigger houses.
Why?
Because with bigger houses, you get more property taxes, right?
So you constantly want to keep driving up the value of houses.
You do that with mass immigration.
You do that with zoning laws that restrict things and so on.
And you do that by constantly pushing women to get bigger and bigger houses with all this house porn that goes on on the home and garden channel and all that.
So you get more and more desire for bigger and bigger houses.
and houses now are two to three times what they were when people had far more kids in the 1960s And the other thing that you do is you get money through the power of the state from men into the hands of women.
You do that because, you know, divorce, single motherhood, and so on.
So how do you do that? Well, you do that through the welfare state, number one, and you do that through alimony and child support, number two, right?
And also you do that, number three, you do that through hiring Tons of women into the government, right?
Because everybody knows, I'm sure it's the same in Brazil as it is just about everywhere else, that when you walk through a government office, it's mostly females.
And so you give them lots of pay, and then you transfer money to men from women through the power of family courts, through the power of divorce and alimony child support, and then you have a welfare state that takes money from productive men in general.
Men pay the majority of taxes and then just dumps it into the hands of women, and the women go spend it right away.
Women are, to a large degree, consumption machines, which is...
Bad for the economy, the environment to the long run.
So, yeah, you have the law.
I said this in a video just released today.
The law doesn't serve the truth.
The law serves women as a whole.
And the state knows which side of the bread is buttered and knows that to say to women, yeah, we're going to universal basic income.
We're going to give you that in a welfare state, old age pensions, which disproportionately benefit women and All of that.
And any man who complains, well, clearly he just hates women.
And it's like, no, this is all bad for women.
This drug consumption of made-up money for women is really bad for them.
But come not between the beast and his prey.
When it's women in government spending, you'll get called a misogynist like that.
Okay. So the last question, what do you think is the result of the election this year?
And do you think after that it's going to be a woman president?
Yes. Well, if Biden gets in, there's pretty high likelihood that Kamala Harris is going to be the president because, I mean, he's not doing well upstairs.
You know, it's pretty clear. You know, he was doing a teleprompter reading the other day and he actually read end quote like he didn't know that just meant stop quoting someone.
And so, yeah, I think that they're going to try obviously and get Biden in and then, you know, they may try and get him disqualified for mental issues.
And so, yeah, I think it could very well be.
The case, and this goes back to an old argument from Ayn Rand, and it's not always the case.
I mean, if you look at someone like Margaret Thatcher, who was an arch-conservative in England while she was a politician in the 70s and 80s and so on, She was kind of half and half, right?
So she said, socialism is all fun until you run out of other people's money.
And she was very much up on Milton Friedman and all of that free market economics, but still found it pretty hard to control immigration and mass spending and all of that.
And then when she tried to put a poll tax in or rationalize some sort of tax system, she got booted out pretty quickly.
So I think it's fairly likely and It's going to be tough.
You know, I mean, there are people on the left who have a fair amount of common sense.
There are people like Tulsi Gabbard and someone who, you know, was against the military-industrial complex and I think would have worked hard to bring the troops home.
And, you know, now, of course, with Trump being nominated for two Nobel Peace Prizes or has been nominated twice for a Nobel Peace Prize for his international work, which is almost beyond reproach.
I mean, you look at the list of wars started by American presidents, and it's endless until Trump, and then there's nothing.
He's not started any new war.
So those who work pretty hard to get him in power should really take a bow and a lap for saving hundreds of thousands or more of human lives from yet another desert war America would start.
So, yeah, you'll very likely at some point get a female president.
But of course, if mass immigration continues into America, it really doesn't matter what happens with regards to media or anything, because the immigrants generally go hard left for their voting.
And after Trump, unless something significant changes, there'll be no effective Republican Party because they'll be as unelectable in America as they are in California.
Yeah, I had that problem.
I was frozen for a couple of seconds, so I lost my screen in the back.
No, I thought you were just really miming yourself very well, gone all ventriloquism on me.
No, no. Can you tell me, some people was asking where can they find you?
Sure. I'm right here in front of you.
Follow the hint. No, I'm on the web at freedomain.com.
And somebody asked earlier, I saw, do you have your backup videos?
Yes, I do. Funny you should ask.
Yes, I do. You can find them on BitChute.
You can find them on library, LBRY. And I'm working with another provider to get backups uploaded and all of that.
So the treasure, while a little bit down in quality for re-encoding, remains there.
So you can get stuff there, and I hope that you will follow the work that I do there.
Perfect. Well, thank you very much.
It was really nice to meet you here.
I think it's the first time you've come live to a Brazilian channel, I guess.
I think that's right. And I told you it would be a fun chat, right?
I'll tell you that. Exactly.
Thank you very much. And thank you very much for people here.
So, please like, share.
Put some comments there.
Thank you very much. Thank you.
Sorry to interrupt. Just as I said, I had only an hour.
For the people, I assume you don't mind if I put this on my channel, for the people and particularly my friends, Spanish-speaking friends and South and Central American-speaking friends, could you just give a little bit, whether in English and in Spanish, on where people can find your book?
My channel is called Macho Toxico.
I only have it on YouTube, basically.
My Twitter account is not that big and Instagram is not as well.
That's my only main channel.
For the people who are just listening to this on the podcast, what's the name of the channel?
Macho Toxico. Macho, like in Spanish, Macho Toxico.
The worst name for a Mexican restaurant I've ever heard.
All right. Thank you very much.
A great pleasure to chat, and I really, really enjoyed it.
Thank you for the invitation. Thank you very much.
▲
Export Selection