All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Jan. 27, 2026 - Skeptoid
22:02
Skeptoid #1025: Pop Quiz: Space Quandaries

Oh no! Another pop quiz. Take the challenge: 9 questions about space. Think you can get them all? Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Jupiter Conspiracy Theories 00:06:15
What exactly can the South Atlantic anomaly do to aircraft and spacecraft that pass through it?
What prevented the Hubble Space Telescope from imaging the Apollo landing sites?
We've got those questions and many more for you on today's edition of the Skeptoid Pop Quiz.
Today, I'm testing your knowledge of space quandaries.
And in our extended content for premium members, additional bonus questions to help you get your score up.
That's all coming up right now on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Pop Quiz, Space Quandaries.
Welcome to the show that separates fact from fiction, science from pseudoscience, real history from fake history, and helps us all make better life decisions by knowing what's real and what's not.
Today, I thought I'd torment you with a pop quiz, knowing that you have not studied for it.
However, if you've paid close attention to Skeptoid for the past 19 years without ever having forgotten a detail from any episode, you should have no problem.
But for the rest of you, you're going to have to rely on your knowledge of space.
But not just real space, but skeptical space, meaning questions about space in which whack jobs and conspiracy theorists have invented their own versions of reality to support their beliefs.
So really, you're going up against them today.
Are you ready?
Let's get started with...
Question number one, fun with Jupiter.
As discussed in Skeptoid number 143, a wacky conspiracy theory charges NASA with launching the Cassini probe to Jupiter as a secret plan to turn Jupiter into a second sun, probably because they saw the movie 2010, the year we make contact, in which this actually happens.
Note that I don't say that they probably read Arthur C. Clarke's original novel, 2010 Odyssey 2, because I doubt their reading skills are up to par.
The conspiracy theory calls this plan the Lucifer Project.
What is the mechanism by which Jupiter would allegedly be turned into a star?
A. Cassini would be accelerated directly into Jupiter's core, striking it with enough energy to explode it and igniting Jupiter's 76% hydrogen atmosphere.
B. Cassini's planned collision into Jupiter would streak through its atmosphere using frictional heating to ignite its atmosphere.
And C.
The plutonium in Cassini's nuclear power packs would compress in Jupiter's atmosphere and become a nuclear explosion, igniting the planet into a star.
The correct answer is C, the plutonium and Cassini's nuclear power packs.
These are RTGs, radioisotope thermal generators, which convert the heat from plutonium decay into electricity, powering the spacecraft.
The claim is ridiculous for at least three reasons.
Number one, the plutonium fuel in an RTG is in small pieces, each wrapped in graphite, and in no case could ever possibly form into a spherical critical mass.
Number two, thermonuclear explosions with 100 times what you could possibly get with all the plutonium in an RTG have been tested on Earth, and Earth didn't turn into a small star, so it's pretty dumb to think Jupiter would.
And three, no matter what you did, Jupiter has too little mass to create gravitational confinement, which is one of the things needed to sustain the fusion reaction in a star.
Question number two, a real warp drive?
I don't think I've ever had a conversation with a UFologist who hasn't pointed out that NASA has endorsed the existence of warp drives, which would allow aliens to freely visit the Earth.
What they're referring to is the Alcubierre drive, a speculative thought experiment published over 30 years ago by physicist Miguel Alcubiera.
As he is quick to acknowledge, what is the main reason it can't work?
A.
It requires exotic matter, which does not exist in the universe.
B.
It requires more energy than exists in the entire Milky Way.
Or C.
It can only exist in a hypothetical alternate universe in which imaginary and real numbers are transposed.
The correct answer is A.
It requires exotic matter.
Exotic matter would be needed to produce negative energy, neither of which exist.
So why would Dr. Alcubierra use them in his design?
Well, think of I, the imaginary number which is the square root of negative 1.
It does not exist in this universe.
You will never have I apples in a basket.
However, even in your high school math, you used it.
Such imaginary numbers come in handy to make certain equations solvable.
Negative energy, while not a real thing that exists, can also be used in approximately the same way in theoretical physics equations.
Can't exist in reality, but makes certain concepts solvable in physics.
Like a conjectural warp drive.
South Atlantic Anomaly Crash 00:03:33
Question 3.
The Black Knight Satellite For decades, some UFO fans have clung to the belief that a 13,000-year-old satellite of alien origin was discovered orbiting the Earth by who else but the god of all crackpot conspiracy theorists, Nikola Tesla.
Every time a Mercury or Apollo astronaut reported seeing something weird, the UFologists took it as a sighting of the alien satellite, which they named the Black Knight satellite, and which was the subject of episode number 365.
Then, in 1998, Space Shuttle Endeavour brought back very clear photos of a strange object in orbit.
While many UFologists were satisfied that this was proof of Black Knight's existence, the astronauts who took the photo have always said that it was of what?
A.
The shuttle's own manipulator arm, aka the Canadarm.
B.
The International Space Station, which they had just left.
Or C, a piece of thermal blanket that got loose from the shuttle's payload bay.
The correct answer is C, a piece of a thermal blanket.
It got loose before they could catch it, so the astronauts documented it with multiple very clear photographs.
No aliens yet.
Question number four, the South Atlantic Anomaly.
Episode number 234 looked at the South Atlantic anomaly, a region of space over Brazil where the irregular shape of the Van Allen radiation belts mean they dip down to only 200 kilometers above the ground.
Many have suspected that interference from the anomaly's radiation could have played a role in the 2009 crash of Air France Flight 447.
Which of the following is true?
A. Flight 447 was never inside the anomaly.
B. Flight 447's flight recorder data tapes showed damage consistent with radiation from the anomaly.
Or C.
It's more likely that Flight 447's electronics were taken out by a solar flare from Sunspot 1019 on the day the plane crashed.
The correct answer is A. Flight 447 was never inside the anomaly.
Its closest approach to Earth is 200 kilometers, yet the highest commercial airlines can fly is about 15 kilometers.
The plane was also some 1,000 kilometers past the anomaly when it went down, which was actually caused by ice on some of its sensors.
If a plane could get way up inside the anomaly, yes, it might have some problems.
Both the International Space Station and a few hundred satellites have to take special procedures to shield sensitive electronics when they pass through it.
The competing conjecture that a solar flare took out the plane can be easily dismissed.
Research done in 1967 at the University of Idaho demonstrated that even during major solar flare events, the flux of high-energy protons at equatorial latitudes remains far too low to cause systemic avionics failures.
Hubble Telescope Landing Sites 00:07:17
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Number five, the Apollo Landing Sites In 2011, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter took telescopic photographs of the footprints of the Apollo astronauts on the moon.
It did not satisfy the moon landing deniers, who claim that if the landing sites were really there, we would have been able to easily see them with the Hubble Space Telescope for the past 20 years, as we discussed in episode number 537 on the undeniable physical proofs that humans from Earth went to the moon and came back.
What's the real reason that Hubble never got photographs of the Apollo landing sites?
A. Hubble doesn't point toward the moon because it's too bright for Hubble's sensitive instruments.
B. Hubble physically cannot angle itself to point toward the moon.
Or C.
The Apollo landing sites are too small for Hubble to see.
The correct answer is C.
The landing sites are too small.
This sounds hard to believe, but consider the immense size of the galaxies Hubble is designed to look at.
Even though they're incredibly far away, their size is such that the math works out.
The Apollo sites are tiny and still pretty far away for Hubble.
Even the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, which is literally right there orbiting above the sites, couldn't see any fine details when it first photographed the landing sites in 2009.
It had to make a series of special extremely low altitude passes to resolve them in 2011.
Number 6.
Circumbinary Exoplanets Episode number 570 was about especially cool space missions, and one was the Kepler Space Telescope, which discovered so many exoplanets.
So you remember in Star Wars, Luke lived in Tatooine, and there is a sunset with two stars.
That means Tatooine orbited a binary star, and so it was what we call a circumbinary exoplanet.
How many circumbinary exoplanets are known as of today, January 2026?
A. Fewer than 50.
B. Between 50 and 500.
Or C. More than 500 The correct answer is A. Fewer than 50.
Only a small handful of people have discovered those that are known, which is considered to be, quote, fewer than 25, because some candidates are in various stages of confirmation.
Number 7.
Little Green Men Skeptoid number 486 looked at the history of the flying saucer craze and of claims of little green men from space.
Scientists suddenly took this idea very seriously, at least briefly, when a steadily repeating radio signal was picked up coming from deep space.
In honor of little green men, the signal was named LGM-1, and it was soon found to be one of the following three objects.
However, your question is which of these following three objects is not found in the Milky Way?
A. Quasar B. Magnetar or C. Pulsar The correct answer is A. Quasars are not in the Milky Way.
They are the extremely luminous active nucleus of a distant galaxy powered by a supermassive black hole at the center.
Pulsars and magnetars are found inside the Milky Way.
And incidentally, LGM-1 turned out to be a pulsar, named for its pulsing.
It's how we found out about them.
They are rapidly spinning neutron stars throwing out a powerful radio beam which sweeps past you like the beam of a lighthouse.
8. Detecting particles There are two particle detectors in the world with a volume of at least one cubic kilometer the American Ice Cube buried in the ice near the South Pole and the Russian Baikal GVD beneath the waters of Lake Baikal, which is currently offline for upgrades and discussed in episode number 771.
Two others are being built, the European KM3 net in the Mediterranean and a secretive Chinese one expected to be much larger.
What type of particles are these designed to detect?
A. Gravitational waves B dark matter candidate particles or C Neutrinos The correct answer is C neutrinos.
These are fundamental, nearly massless, electrically neutral subatomic particles that travel at very close to the speed of light, interacting so weakly with matter that they can pass through planets as if they weren't there, making them abundant yet elusive ghost particles from gnarly events.
Said gnarly events include supernovae, collisions of neutron stars, and violent radiation from black hole event horizons.
Sagittarius A Star Signal 00:04:53
Number 9.
WOW!
And finally, an unreasonably difficult question that you would have no reason to know unless you were either super into astrology or are some kind of savant on the subject of the famous 1977 WOW signal, discussed in episode number 342.
This mysterious deep space radio signal came from the direction of which constellation?
A. Sagittarius.
B. Ursa Major or C. Orion The correct answer is A. Sagittarius.
And it just so happens that we have some late-breaking news on the WOW signal.
That news is that whatever the most recent thing is you read online that it's finally been identified is actually super old news.
Someone proposed that same thing 40 years ago and again 20 years ago and again last week and it was easily dismissed each time.
So be prepared for another announcement soon.
And again, I predict, with my psychic powers, that the same conditions will apply.
And that's all we have for you today.
Total up your score.
We had nine questions.
If you got seven or more right, you are part of the Skeptoid Inner Circle and entitled to participate in our next occult indoctrination ceremony at our secret location.
Five or more right, you qualify to join our apprenticeship program and can start by carrying water up our mountainside for the next 10 years.
If you only got four or fewer, then I'm sorry.
But we're going to have to ask you to report to one of our retraining centers for orderly disposal in our disintegration machines.
And those are your only choices.
Unless, of course, you've studied the fallacy of the excluded middle.
We continue with two more bonus questions which you can use to increase your score in the ad-free and extended premium feed.
To access it, become a supporter at skeptoid.com slash go premium.
A great big Skeptoid shout out to our premium supporters, including Mary Ann, James Monroe, but not the fifth president of the U.S., Guy Near from the Weissman Flat Earth Society, and Ron Sateloff, who muses, if only skeptics weren't viewed with such skepticism.
I'll be at Iowa Western Community College on February 12th and at the University of Nebraska on February 13th.
A solid possibility of public pub nights at the end of both days.
If you can help organize that with a group, ping me at brian at skeptoid.com.
Following that, I'll be speaking at the Science Talk 26 conference on March 26th and 27th for the Association of Science Communicators.
To book me for your own event, come to skeptoid.com slash speaking.
Skeptoid is a production of Skeptoid Media.
Director of Operations and Tinfoil Hat Counter is Kathy Reitmeyer.
Marketing guru and Illuminati liaison is Jake Young.
Production Management and All Things Audio by Will McCamblis.
Music is by Lee Sanders.
Researched and written by me, Brian Dunning.
Listen to Skeptoid for free on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or iHeart.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection