All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 16, 2024 - Skeptoid
19:39
Skeptoid #945: A Sea of Younger Dryas Woo

Pseudoarchaeologists often will cite the Younger Dryas climatic event as proof of their ancient advanced civilization. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Younger Dryas Pseudo-Archaeology 00:06:34
The Younger Dryas cooling period at the end of the last ice age has drawn more pseudo-archaeology and alternative natural histories than just about any other event in recent geological times.
Was it a global cataclysm, perhaps caused by destruction from outer space?
Was it the event that destroyed Atlantis and other ancient advanced civilizations?
We're going to find out today on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's Hyperfixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
A sea of younger dryas.
Woo.
Welcome to the show that separates fact from fiction, science from pseudoscience, real history from fake history, and helps us all make better life decisions by knowing what's real and what's not.
The Younger Dryas event, a 1200-year period of unusual cooling at the end of the last ice age, is said by some to have been inexplicable according to conventional climatology.
And so, some believe, it must have had an exotic cause, perhaps a barrage of meteors that wrapped the Earth in a shadowy blanket of cold.
They believe this period was so uniquely destructive that it could only have been the cause for the destruction of Atlantis.
Today, we're going to find out whether this is what scientists and historians believe, or whether it's the realm of, well, other types of thinkers.
First, a brief explanation of what the Younger Dryas period was, as it very much was a real thing.
The most recent ice age, often called the last glacial period, is generally considered to have lasted from 115,000 years ago until 11,700 years ago.
That's a long time, and during the ice age, there were a lot of minor climatic events where it would get a little warmer or a little cooler for a few centuries.
In all, climatologists have identified about 25 major climatic events since the start of the ice age, with rapid beginnings and endings on the order of decades or centuries.
But about 18,000 years ago, temperatures began trending upward for good, signaling a final end to the ice age.
It warmed and warmed.
But then, about 12,900 years ago, that warming paused, and we had another 12 cooler centuries, which lasted until 11,700 years ago, when the warming resumed.
Those 12 cooler centuries during the overall warming are what's called the Younger Dryas event.
Then, by 8,000 or 9,000 years ago, temperatures got close to where they remained until this past century.
So that's the Younger Dryas period in a nutshell.
Its end is what we consider the official end of the Ice Age and the beginning of the Holocene epoch.
The ending of an ice age was a major climate event that also brought the extinction of many famous species of prehistoric megafauna.
Giant sloths, short-faced bears, woolly mammoths and mastodons, saber-toothed cats, dire wolves.
In all, about 70% of all the world species of megafauna failed to survive the warming end of the Pleistocene.
But we should also be clear that while the Younger Dryas was a period of cooler temperatures, these were only in the northern hemisphere.
The southern hemisphere, conversely, was warmer during that same period.
It was a complex event, as were all such events.
So it's best to think of Younger Dryas as a climate disruption rather than strictly as a cooler period.
This is all pretty cut and dried science.
We have huge amounts of evidence for the Younger Dryas period, as we have for all of those 25 or so climate events since the beginning of the Ice Age.
We have ice core data.
We have lake and marine sediments, pollen, spaleothems, glacial geology, marine microfossils, dendrochronology, and more.
So you might be wondering if the science is this solid, where is there room for any woo, more properly called in this case, misinformation?
Nearly all of it comes from the world of pseudo-archaeology.
Pseudo-archaeology is the decidedly unscientific field in which people with little or no education in real archaeology come up with alternate earth histories based upon their own notions, or upon YouTube videos made by people who prognosticated the content from their own notions.
Consequently, these ideas are generally in direct opposition to knowledge held by the people who actually are archaeologists and have learned the field and done the work.
The basic plot is that the Younger Dryas is believed to have been so uniquely catastrophic that it caused a global cataclysm, destroying ancient civilizations like Atlantis and wiping out all manner of advanced peoples who lived here before us.
And thus, as a sudden global catastrophe, it must have had a sudden trigger, like a worldwide barrage of meteors or massive supervolcanoes or an explosion of radiation from the sun or deep space.
We'll talk about some of these alternative conjectures in a moment, but one thing that's important to note is that they all treat the Younger Dryas as if it was a unique event requiring some kind of exotic explanation.
It was not unique, or even very different from many other similar events.
Unique Event or Common Occurrence 00:10:01
For example, the two similar cool periods before it were the older Dryas and the Oldest Dryas.
These were only the most recent of all of these 25 or so such events.
Incidentally, the Dryas periods get their name from the eight-petaled Dryad flower, because sediments from that era are rich with Dryad fossils.
We'll get started on our alternate theories of Younger Dryas with the one that's best to have as a foundation, and that's the real science.
The Real Cause Cooling periods during the past ice age, including the three Dryas events, all have a lot in common.
The most significant of these has to do with a major Atlantic current called the AMOC, the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation.
This is the most important current in the Atlantic.
Think of it as a great underwater conveyor belt, its top layer moving northward, bringing warm southern waters into the northern hemisphere, and its bottom layer making the return trip, moving the deep, colder, saltier water southward.
This deeper southward current is called the NADW, North Atlantic Deep Water, and it collects cold water from a complex of several northern currents.
The AMOC is hugely influential on climate.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
When the AMOC weakens, less heat is brought from the south to the north.
The north cools, the south warms.
This is exactly what happened during the dryest periods and other cooling periods before them.
Scientific support for the weakening of the AMOC as the primary cause of the younger dryest and other such periods is practically universal.
But where opinion spreads out a bit is on the triggering events that caused the weakening.
Here's where we come to a very important point.
The fact that there are differing opinions on the triggering events doesn't mean nobody has a clue and the alternative conjectures are equally likely.
It means the trigger was multifactorial and it's very hard to know how much influence each of the factors had.
Scientists almost all agree on what the primary triggers were.
They are, number one, an enormous influx of fresh water into the North Atlantic from the collapse of ice dams in North America.
Number two, complex feedback mechanisms worldwide, combining things like reflectivity from snow cover and the impacts of sea ice and vegetation.
Number three, extreme volcanic activity could add cooling dust into the atmosphere.
And number four, the fierce complexity of global climate and how massive scale patterns interact with one another.
Between those, we're covered.
We know those triggers all happened to some degree, and between them, they are sufficient to explain the cooling periods.
But nobody has a complete picture of exactly how influential each was during each cooling period.
And that's basically the scope of the uncertainty that exists.
And so, seizing upon that uncertainty and magnifying it into a straw man that nobody knows anything and therefore any random conjecture is equally valid, alternative historians of all stripes have proposed these bizarro world scenarios.
Younger Dryas destroyed Atlantis, Lemuria, etc.
We've talked about both Atlantis and Lemuria in previous skeptoid episodes, and obviously neither actually existed, and so of course was unharmed by Younger Dryas.
But pseudo-archaeology authors like Graham Hancock and Andrew Collins continue to make this claim.
In the episode on the Gerbekli Tepe archaeological site in Turkey, we discussed how both authors, via different mechanisms, credited Younger Dryas with the destruction of Earth's earlier advanced civilization, prompting the few dumb human survivors to build a megalithic structure.
Because why not?
This is also often raised in the context of something being found that seems strange, like an out-of-place artifact that could be a relic of lost advanced technology from some ancient race.
Hancock makes this claim explicitly about Gerbekli Tepe, falsely asserting that its layout or measurements are too precise for mere humans.
Such alternative historians fail to convincingly explain why the Younger Dryas would have had such a catastrophic impact on their advanced ancient civilizations, when they seem to have weathered all the early similar periods without a problem.
Younger Dryas was caused by a barrage of comets or meteors.
It's called the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, and it's what both Hancock and Collins believe happened.
The idea of large impacts about that time in Earth's history does have a small amount of academic support, but as the evidence is scarce, it remains a fringe idea, and there's almost no support for the pseudoscientific belief that such impacts could have a 1200-year effect.
It's also not clear why Hancock et al. feel that only the Younger Dryas event required such an exotic trigger, since they don't seem to have any issue with the science-based explanations for all the other events.
Younger Dryas was caused by extreme solar activity.
Most famously espoused by geologist Robert Schock, who keeps one foot in the world of real science and the other firmly in pseudoscience, this idea is that an intense solar event like solar flares or coronal mass ejections triggered Younger Dryas.
Now, it is true that the most extreme of such events can have minor influences on weather.
There's no underlying theory for how it could possibly launch such a fundamental 1200-year shift in Earth's climate.
Schock does not propose this for the other Dryas periods or the preceding cooling periods, only Younger Dryas, which seems odd.
Younger Dryas was God's tool for creating the flood.
Graham Hancock is also among a number of authors who have proposed that massive flooding during the Younger Dryas period was a likely cause for the biblical flood.
If not literally, then at least those floods could be the source of stories that later made it into the Bible.
The only problem with this is that there is no reason to think Younger Dryas would have caused floods in the Holy Land or anywhere in the vicinity.
Younger Dryas brought about a profound change in human consciousness.
The overall shift in temperatures from the Ice Age to the Holocene took about 10,000 years, during which humans had ample time to gradually migrate as they saw fit.
And of course, they lost much of whatever megafauna they may have hunted, so there were also gradual changes to their diet.
But to characterize this as some kind of profound cosmic shift in consciousness is hard to defend.
Yet you'll find it in the writings of Hancock, Schock, Rand Flem Off, and others.
To me, Younger Dryas is the perfect candidate for a topic that draws pseudoscience like flies.
Pseudoscientists like Graham Hancock know that it has a science-y-sounding name, so invoking it adds credibility to whatever wild conjecture he's pitching that day.
He knows few people have any idea what it is or how it worked, so he can pretty much say whatever he likes.
And yet, it's a real thing that has real scientific evidence behind it, so any fact-checking tends to lend him even more unearned credibility.
Science Friction Premium Feed 00:03:01
And that, my friends, is why we will probably always have currents of pseudoscience running through a sea of Younger Dryas woo.
We continue with some weird stuff that actually did happen during the Younger Dryas in the ad-free and extended premium feed.
To access it, become a supporter at skeptoid.com slash go premium.
A great big Skeptoid shout-out to our premium supporters, including Gregorio Gagne in Japan, Dave, Gina, Lucy, and Sophia from Brisbane, Australia, Chuck and Scott Morgan, a dad and son listening together, and Harry Houdini from Canberra, Australia.
Oh, wait, that's Harry Hooper, not Harry Houdini.
Darn it.
I was hoping we could get that guy as a supporter.
Watch our feature documentary film, Science Friction, a shocking look at how TV networks will edit scientists out of context and misrepresent them.
Science Friction, available on most streaming services.
Free accompanying educational materials for teachers are provided on the movie's website at sciencefriction.tv.
Skeptoid is a production of Skeptoid Media.
Director of Operations and Tinfoil Hat Counter is Kathy Reitmeyer.
Marketing guru and Illuminati liaison is Jake Young.
Production management and all things audio by Will McCandless.
Music is by Lee Sanders.
Researched and written by me, Brian Dunning.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection