All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
May 7, 2024 - Skeptoid
18:57
Skeptoid #935: Fruitful Feedback and Followups

Skeptoid answers another round of listener feedback questions. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Kugel Blitz Misunderstanding 00:05:53
Today we're going to open the Skeptoid email inbox.
While normally I might say that you will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy, today we're actually looking at the good emails, the ones that added helpful context or updated some older information or otherwise helped to make Skeptoid better.
These are your emails.
That's coming up right now on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Fruitful feedback and follow-ups.
Welcome to the show that separates fact from fiction, science from pseudoscience, real history from fake history, and helps us all make better life decisions by knowing what's real and what's not.
Once again, we have for you a whole raft of updates and responses to feedback on various recent Skeptoid episodes.
Today we're going to examine whether blobs of atmospheric plasma could have accounted for the Foo Fighters, what mosquito repellents actually work, the latest status update on Havana syndrome, and what it really takes to change your spaceship's direction in space, and what killed Ludwig von Beethoven.
Let's dive right in.
Episode number 924 was about the Foo Fighters, UFOs reported by World War II pilots.
In the episode, we discussed a number of proposed explanations for what they were.
Listener Chris wrote in, This article was published a few months ago.
I think it differentiates from St. Elmo's fire enough to make it a separate, possible explanation of Foo Fighters.
Thank you for fighting the good fight.
And he included a link to a news article about an upcoming publication about plasmas that exist in the thermosphere between 100 and 600 kilometers up.
They speculated that some of these plasmas may sometimes descend into the lower atmosphere, and that could be what the World War II pilots all saw.
Color me incredulous, but I think that's a horrible attempt at an explanation.
For one thing, this is not something known to happen.
For another, if this is indeed what countless pilots saw in World War II, then it would be a well-known phenomenon familiar to every pilot today, and all atmospheric scientists would know all about it.
It's none of those things.
It's an attempt to explain one unknown with another unknown.
And though it can be tempting, you can't use this to make something true just because you want it to be true.
In the same episode, I mentioned a World War II German self-propelled anti-aircraft gun called a Kugel Blitz and said that it means lightning bullet.
Well, a lot of you, and I mean a lot, emailed to correct me that it means ball lightning.
And many of you even sent links to the term on machine translators like Google Translate, as if looking up the translation had never occurred to me.
The problem everyone fell into here is that Kugel can mean either ball or bullet, depending on the context.
In English, we use the term musket ball because bullets used to be literally little round balls.
We continued using the term for the Mine Ball during the Civil War, even though it was no longer round.
And throughout the English literature the late 19th and early 20th century, you'll still find many cases where ball was used colloquially to mean bullet.
In German, they also said musket ball, musketenkugel.
They also said mine ball, mine kugel.
And yet the German scientific literature shows that the term Kugelblitz was broadly used in theoretical papers about ball lightning as early as 1900.
So when it came to the German anti-aircraft vehicle, I went online to German language military history forums and asked the question there.
In the case of the Kugelblitz vehicle, was Kugel used to mean ball or bullet?
The verdict?
I'd say it was equally split.
Some said it was a gun that fired bullets, so obviously Kugel was used in the bullet sense, lightning bullet.
Others said it was just a name, and they were naming it after a cool and dramatic phenomenon, ball lightning.
Whoever originally named the Kugelblitz gun does not appear to have left any writings explaining the choice.
So for now, I'm just going to leave this one as indeterminate.
In episode number 862 about mosquitoes, I described DEET as the only repellent that actually works decently.
Listener Jonathan wrote in, On your recent podcast on people being attractive to mosquitoes, you said that DEET is the only proven repellent.
Isn't Picaridon, a relatively new one, as effective as DEET?
Confidence in Foreign Adversaries 00:04:08
It has the advantage of being less oily and not damaging to plastics.
Hence, I like to use it for backpacking so a leak won't damage gear.
You are correct, sir.
Most studies find Picaridin comparable to DEET.
You should be equally good with either.
Episodes number 603 and 761 were both about Havana syndrome, a name given by the press for the now infamous 2016 event where workers at the American embassy in Havana, Cuba believed themselves to have been attacked by what they figured must have been some sort of acoustic weapon of a hypothetical type that does not exist in reality.
Although the vast majority of people who have studied this event now classify it as a nearly perfect textbook example of a mass psychogenic event, a few still cling to the belief that a type of new science fiction weapon has been developed in secret by some power somewhere and is being used against Americans in embassies all around the world.
If you search the news archives since 2016, you'll find waves going back and forth where first some new study will find that the alleged victims all had a type of novel brain damage, proving the existence of this hypothetical weapon.
And next, some other study will be published finding that none of the victims actually suffered any effects at all, outside of the expected symptoms of the acute stress they are all known to have been under.
So today, I'm here to give the latest and greatest.
Luckily, the news over the past year or so has been largely favoring the true version of what happened.
This began in March 2023 when the National Intelligence Council published an unclassified assessment of what they're now calling anomalous health incidents.
It seems they've backed down from their earlier language calling the event an attack.
The report surveys seven intelligence agencies but does not name them.
Finally, they are now all in agreement that no foreign adversary attacked anyone.
Two agencies assess with moderate to high confidence that it's very unlikely a foreign adversary was involved.
Three agencies assess with moderate confidence that it's very unlikely a foreign adversary was involved.
And two agencies assess with low confidence that it's unlikely a foreign adversary was involved.
The later news is that two large studies were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in March 2024, finding no evidence that anyone suffered any injury of any kind.
There were no significant differences between any of the affected individuals and control groups.
It's nice that the intelligence community thinks that probably no foreign adversary was responsible for this nothing that didn't happen.
Perhaps once they realize there was nothing for them even to assess, they'll raise their confidence levels on that conclusion.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
Spacecraft Momentum Explained 00:03:51
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Episode number 697 was on reactionless space drives, which are a science fiction concept that would allow a spacecraft to move itself in space without any equal and opposite reaction, a violation of Newton's third law of motion.
What I said in the episode was, if I want to change the direction of my spacecraft's movement, the only physically possible way to do that is to expel a certain amount of mass in the opposite direction.
Yes, yes, generally that's true, but there are subtleties to be aware of.
You may recall the so-called Pioneer Anomaly.
In 1994, scientists began investigating why the Pioneer 10 and 11 deep space probes were decelerating more than the sun's gravity could account for.
The answer turned out to be their power plants, radioisotope thermal generators, emitting thermal radiation.
The generators' locations were on the side of the spacecraft opposite from the sun, so they were emitting photons of heat energy away from the sun.
This caused thermal recoil.
So radiating heat in one direction was changing the spacecraft's movement.
But I said you had to expel mass to do that, and photons don't have any mass.
But mass and energy are the same thing, right?
Mass-energy equivalence is literally what the equation E equals mc squared illustrates.
Much email debate ensued.
Although many people weighed in with various explanations that ranged all the way to ferociously complicated, I think listener Leonard offered the simplest and clearest.
A better way to put the requirement for a rocket to work is to say that momentum must be preserved.
To change the rocket's momentum in a particular direction, something with momentum must be expelled in the opposite direction.
Light has momentum, so the problem is avoided.
But wait, you might say, an object's momentum is a product of its mass and velocity.
So how can light, which is massless, have momentum?
And we're back again at mass-energy equivalence.
Although we can definitely convert between a photon's energy and the equivalent mass, the photon itself has no mass as it's photoning along.
So Leonard's statement is correct, and my original idea is, well, it's not quite incorrect, but it's oversimplified to the point that it gives the wrong idea.
I struggled whether to include this in an error correction episode or in a listener feedback episode.
In the end, I think an error correction episode would have been more appropriate, but we're here in a feedback episode, primarily because we just had an error correction episode, and this feedback episode was coming up.
I am hereby due 10 lashes with a wet noodle to square the accounts.
Beethoven's Lead Poisoning 00:05:00
Episode number 561 debunked the pop culture post-mortem of the composer Beethoven, which holds that he died of lead poisoning.
Like the false belief that Mozart was murdered by his colleague Salieri, this story about Beethoven made its way into the popular consciousness via sensationalist media.
A 2000 book and 2005 TV movie both claimed that analysis of locks of Beethoven's hair proved the lead poisoning.
Well, that's always been a fringe view, which is why it needed a book and movie to promote it.
Beethoven's symptoms were nothing like those of lead poisoning, nor was there any reason to suspect Beethoven might have had more lead in his system than anyone else of his day and age.
Doctors who have studied his symptoms and the circumstances of his death have always believed he suffered from chronic liver disease, probably accompanied by hepatitis.
This was the main point of the skeptoid episode.
And now a new study has just been published that basically adds evidence to, if not outright confirms, today's best medical analysis of what afflicted Beethoven.
The study did genetic analysis rather than chemical analysis on genuine locks of Beethoven's hair.
Published in the journal Current Biology, a team has found that Beethoven had a genetic predisposition for liver disease.
They also found genetic material in his hair from the hepatitis B virus, indicating that he did indeed have hepatitis during the last months of his life.
And thus we conclude another episode of feedback and follow-ups on Skeptoid.
Keeping the Skeptoid website as good a resource as it can be means keeping stuff current and updated, so we've always got that in mind as a goal.
If you've got something to add, update, or correct, unless it's that your very reliable uncle told you his grandmother's poodle is psychic and she would gain nothing by lying about it and therefore we need to retract about half of our episodes, then please get in touch.
Come to skeptoid.com slash corrections.
Until next time, keep thinking and stay skeptical.
We continue in the ad-free and extended premium feed with two more emails that I did not choose to include and my clever responses.
To access that, become a supporter at skeptoid.com slash go premium.
A great big Skeptoid shout out to our premium supporters such as David and Pam Rossiter from Tucson, Topher, Mallory Graydon, and Paul Casarino.
If you're a student or better yet, a teacher with a lot of students, don't forget our student question episodes.
Record any question and I'll play it and answer it for you right here in a special episode.
The best is when a teacher offers extra credit for every student who submits a question.
And that should be you.
Come to skeptoid.com and scroll through the menus for student questions.
I'm here.
I'm ready.
Skeptoid is a production of Skeptoid Media.
Director of Operations and Tinfoil Hat Counter is Kathy Reitmeyer.
Marketing guru and Illuminati liaison is Jake Young.
Production Management and All Things Audio by Will McCandless.
Music is by Lee Sanders.
Researched and written by me, Brian Dunning.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection