All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
April 30, 2024 - Skeptoid
19:50
Skeptoid #934: Decoding the Kensington Runestone

The story goes that this stone covered with Viking runes was found in a Minnesota field in 1898. Its true history is much more interesting. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Decoding the Kensington Runestone 00:14:44
In 1898, a controversial stone appeared in Kensington, Minnesota.
It was covered in Old Norse runes and told a tale of a 14th century Viking journey of exploration deep into the American Midwest.
Is it possible that the Kensington rune stone is a genuine artifact?
Or is there a much richer story here having to do with when the stone was carved, by whom, and most importantly, why?
That's coming up right now on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Decoding the Kensington Runestone.
Welcome to the show that separates fact from fiction, science from pseudoscience, real history from fake history, and helps us all make better life decisions by knowing what's real and what's not.
Today we have for you a story about context.
No historical event took place in a vacuum, and a thorough understanding of any such event requires an understanding of its context.
What else was going on in the world at the time?
What was happening 10 meters away and 10 minutes before?
This is the story of the Kensington Rune Stone, an apparent Viking artifact allegedly discovered in Minnesota in 1898.
The only problem was its location, 3,000 kilometers inland from where any Viking was ever known to have been.
Study of the runes inscribed on the stone lead us to one interpretation of its authenticity.
The rest we get from its context, archaeological context to the find itself, and cultural context of the time in which it was produced.
So let us now see to what conclusion those things will take us.
To start with, we'll give an abbreviated history of Vikings in the New World.
In 1960, archaeological evidence proved the existence of a Viking settlement on the tip of the great northern peninsula of the island of Newfoundland in Canada, dated to the 11th century, a site now called La Zamadus.
It was occupied for only a short time, probably less than 10 years, and was likely a base camp for further exploration of the North American coast and not intended to become a permanent settlement.
Likely reasons for its early abandonment include conflicts with North American indigenous people and logistical problems with the climate and being so far away from established communities in Greenland and Iceland.
So, fast forward some 850 years to a field near the town of Kensington, Minnesota in 1898, where farmer Ulaf Uman, a Swedish immigrant, was winching up tree stumps in a field he'd acquired to prepare it for plowing.
Entangled in the roots of one stump was what appeared to be a large stone tablet covered in unfamiliar carved symbols.
He shared it with people in the community, Swedish and Norwegian, including a newspaper and university professors.
One of these was Ulaus Breda, a professor of Scandinavian languages, who gave us the stone's first translation.
It says, Eight Swedes and 22 Norwegians on a discovery voyage from Vinland westward.
We had anchored by two rocky islets one day's voyage north from this stone.
We had fished a day, and after we came home, we found ten men red with blood and dead.
Ave Maria, deliver us from evil.
We have ten men at sea to look after our ship 14 days' travel from this island.
Year 1362.
Breda dismissed it as a hoax, based on the writing alone, which was full of inconsistencies.
Over the years, the writing has been critically examined by many experts, including direct examination in Scandinavia, and all find the same linguistic and orthographic flaws in it.
Some of the words are wrong.
They're modern and weren't found in Old Norse.
For example, the word for discovery wasn't in Old Norse at all.
It came into the language when it was borrowed from French in the 1500s.
Some of the runes have umlots, which were not used before the 17th century.
The grammar and word endings didn't make sense for that time in history, and so on.
Interestingly, some believers have regarded these errors as evidence pointing toward authenticity, on the principle that your average Norse explorer would have made spelling errors and so on, just as the average person on the street would today.
But would he have had the prescience to know words that wouldn't exist for another two centuries?
Others have found further problems with the carving itself.
The edges are sharp and do not show the weathering we'd expect with age.
The runes are a cleaner, lighter color than the rest of the stone and with no patina, indicating that they hadn't been exposed or been buried for a long time.
There are also problems with the story told on the stone.
The stone's presumptive author couldn't have been on a journey from Vinland, as we have modern archaeological evidence that that region around Newfoundland was in Viking hands in the 11th century, not in 1362.
Kensington was a lot more than 14 days' travel from any place their ship could have been.
Although in Uman's day, the Erie Canal allowed ships to make it from the Atlantic to the Great Lakes, that didn't exist in 1362.
They were a minimum of 1,500 kilometers west of the farthest west they could have gotten in a longship.
There's also a problem with Uman's own story.
He claims he studied the strange writing on the stone but did not recognize them to be runes and figured it might have been, quote, an Indian almanac.
This doesn't add up, as Uman owned a Swedish book titled The Well-Informed Schoolmaster, which included a tutorial on runes.
He'd signed his name and written the date inside the cover, eight years before the appearance of the runestone.
Also, the text referencing the Virgin Mary is written as AVM, the same Latin script characters we use in English.
The AVM is prominent and is easily noticed.
If you thought it was suspicious that a Viking runestone would reference the Virgin Mary at all, this is one thing the carver got correct.
AVM was used in Sweden as early as the 1300s.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Malaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finish the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
So now we move on to context.
Archaeological finds, like everything else, do not exist in a vacuum.
There will always be context.
After the stone was found, excavations were made all around the site.
More thorough modern work was done in 1964, an even more thorough investigation over the wider area in 1981, all searching for the archaeological context of the runestone.
In his book, Encyclopedia of Dubious Archaeology, archaeologist Ken Fader writes, Nothing was found in any of these studies that could be related to the 30 hardy Norsemen who, had they genuinely traveled through the area, would have camped, eaten meals, thrown away trash, discarded broken tools, or lost objects before, during, or after carving their message in runes on a chunk of local sandstone.
Nor were the skeletal remains or burials found of any of the 10 men killed, presumably by local Indians, as mentioned in the runic inscription.
In fact, no diagnostic 14th century Norse artifacts are recovered in any of the excavations that might support the assertion that a contingent of Norsemen was present there more than six centuries ago.
Yet at Lans Amédouz, we have all of these things, plus much more.
Context makes the difference between an actual artifact and a fake one.
From an archaeological perspective, it simply isn't plausible that there would be no other record at all of this heavily manned journey of exploration that spent enough time in Kensington to carve the stone and to have fought and died.
Inevitably, the finding that the rune stone is a modern forgery brings up the question of Ulaf Uman, who would almost certainly have been the principal in the creation of the hoax, if not the actual hoaxer himself.
What motivation would he have had?
He didn't try to get rich off the stone.
He didn't seek out fame and fortune.
He would have had no reason to do it, would he?
And here is where our second point of context comes from.
Not the archaeological context of the stone in the field, but the cultural context of a man producing evidence of early Norse visitation.
What was happening in the local Scandinavian culture?
In the 1890s, Vikings were very much in the pop consciousness, as were their voyages to America.
This was a period known as the Viking Revival, which had seen a renewed interest in Vikings in Europe and by the late 1800s was spreading among Americans, particularly among Scandinavian Americans.
This was largely due to the 1874 publication of America Not Discovered by Columbus by Norwegian-American Rasmus B. Anderson.
By the 1880s, Scandinavian Americans were growing increasingly vocal about North America's Viking heritage.
But a gauntlet was about to be thrown down.
In 1893, Chicago hosted the World Fair.
This particular edition was dubbed the World's Columbian Exposition in recognition of the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus's arrival in the New World.
This celebration of Columbus was seen as something of a challenge to the Scandinavian community in the United States, who had always believed that Vikings came here before Columbus.
And although we now have the archaeological proof of this, in the 1890s that proof hadn't yet been discovered.
The belief was largely based on stories from the sagas, which many believe cast North America as Vinland.
Well, this notion of a world's fair to celebrate Columbus as the first to sail to the New World was the final straw, and some Scandinavian Americans decided to do something about it.
Two famed Norwegian shipbuilders, Kristen Kriestensen and Ola Veger, decided to prove that such a voyage was well within the abilities of Vikings even as far back as the 9th century.
They constructed an exact replica of the Goksta ship, an actual Viking longship discovered in a Norwegian burial mound in 1880.
This is that very famous longship so dramatically displayed at the Viking Ship Museum in Oslo.
They christened their replica the Viking.
Viking was an open longship 24 meters long and 5 meters wide.
In April 1893, Captain Manjus Ondnussen set sail with a crew of 11 men from Christiania, which is what Oslo was called at the time.
They sailed a legit Viking longship through the North Sea, across the North Atlantic to Newfoundland, then to New York, then up the Hudson River, and all the way to the Erie Canal, through the Great Lakes, and finally to Chicago, where the Viking was proudly displayed, a snub to the World's Columbian Exposition.
Viking Mania and Hoaxes 00:02:25
To say that the local Scandinavian population was pleased would be an understatement.
And only a few years earlier, in 1887, baking powder magnate Aben Norton Horsford, an American enthusiast of Viking culture, commissioned a statue of Leif Ericsson in Boston to commemorate the presumed Viking settlements in North America.
A copy of this statue also went up that same year in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Two years later, Horsford had a stone tower erected in Weston, Massachusetts on what he believed had been the site of a Viking settlement called Norumbega.
All these monuments are still there and can be visited.
In 1923, some 25 years after the Kensington runestone, but during the same Viking revival period, another rune stone was, quote, discovered near Heavener, Oklahoma.
It is universally considered a contemporary hoax.
In the 1960s, two more were, quote, found in Oklahoma of equally dubious provenance.
A few others have variously surfaced in other parts of the country since, all of them also fairly obvious hoaxes.
And so it was during this period of Viking mania, if you will, and widespread efforts to celebrate and prove the Vikings' pre-Columbian landings on North America that farmer Olaf Uman, who just happened to be of Scandinavian descent, stumbled across this stone tablet in his field, which just happened to be covered in Viking runes.
In orchestrating the hoax of the Kensington Runestone, Uman was doing no more or less than were many others who shared his same heritage and admiration for their ancestors and hoped only to see them recognized.
And thus we conclude our little story about context.
Neither malice nor greed were required to bring the runestone to life and to make it a part of pop culture.
You can visit the actual stone.
It's on display at the Runestone Museum in Alexandria, Minnesota.
If you do, regard it not as a deceit, but as a symbol of pride.
Pride in one of history's greatest and most impactful cultures, the Vikings.
Skepticism as Best Medicine 00:02:36
We continue with a discussion of the best book about the Kensington Runestone in the ad-free and extended premium feed.
To access it, become a supporter at skeptoid.com slash go premium.
A great big Skeptoid shout out to our premium members, including Eric Travis, Mobzy, Michael Bigelow, who's always looking for what's most likely true and rejecting things that have been falsified, and Michael Maris.
Are you getting the Skeptoid podcast companion email?
It comes out each week along with each new episode, featuring the wonder of the week, show notes, and much more.
If you don't, you're only getting half the show.
So come to skeptoid.com and click on Podcast Companion Email.
Skeptoid is a production of Skeptoid Media.
Director of Operations and Tinfoil Hat Counter is Kathy Reitmeyer.
Marketing guru and Illuminati liaison is Jake Young.
Production management and all things audio by Will McCandless.
Music is by Lee Sanders.
Researched and written by me, Brian Dunning.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From P R X
Export Selection