All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 25, 2023 - Skeptoid
18:13
Skeptoid #894: The Klerksdorp Spheres

Are these remarkable stones natural, or proof of an ancient advanced civilization? Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Ancient Civilization Relics 00:09:04
What would you do if you found a perfect metal ball, absolutely spherical, with finely etched grooves around its center, so straight and regular they look like they were made with a laser engraving machine?
Would you assume it's just an ordinary rock?
Or would you assume it's some artificial device manufactured by some advanced civilization?
We're going to find out right now on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's Hyperfixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
The Klerksdorp Spheres Imagine miners or rock hounds working a 3 billion year old rock deposit, when suddenly what pops out of the rock but a flawless metallic sphere.
It's a rare combination of alloys, unusual for anywhere on Earth, and it's more perfectly round than any human manufacturing technique could produce.
But not only that, it has three perfect parallel grooves etched around its equator.
It is quite obviously artificial, so what could it be doing in this 3 billion year old deposit?
This is the mystery posed by a set of objects known as the Klerksdorp spheres, and which some authors have explained, convincingly to some, they are examples of out-of-place artifacts that are best explained as relics of an extinct ancient advanced civilization.
Today we're going to find out if a dividing line between fact and fiction intersects the story of the Klerksdorp spheres.
And if it does, exactly where along that spectrum does it slice?
The spheres are a series of round rocks, many of them being in the 3 to 10 centimeter range.
Think between a golf ball and a cantaloupe.
They were found around the town of Ottosdahl in South Africa, a region in which pyrophyllite deposits are found on the order of 3 billion years old, give or take.
And that's very old, as rocks go.
There is no firm count for how many Klerksdorp spheres there are.
Probably lots and lots of them.
Most have probably been collected privately, but a few are best known for being on display at the Klerksdorp Museum about an hour away, from where they get their name.
One of these, which is the one you're most likely to see if you do an internet search for them, is blotchy brownish in color, but with three thin, remarkable white or yellow lines, perfectly straight and parallel, circumscribing its equator.
It actually is quite an impressive artifact, and if you showed it to me, having no knowledge of its origin, there would be little doubt in my mind that it was manufactured artificially.
This conclusion was shared by the creationist authors Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson in their 1993 book, Forbidden Archaeology, The Hidden History of the Human Race.
This book spoke of many artifacts around the world that they believed constituted evidence of pre-flood advanced civilizations, and they included a page on the Klerksdorp spheres.
They included a quote they attributed to Rolf Marx, curator of the Clerksdorp Museum.
The spheres are a complete mystery.
They look man-made, yet at the time in Earth's history when they came to rest in this rock, no intelligent life existed.
They're nothing like I have ever seen before.
There is nothing scientific published about the globes, but the facts are they are found in pyrophyllite, which is mined near the little town of Ottostal in the western Transvaal.
This pyrophyllite is a quite soft secondary mineral with a count of only three on the Mohs scale and was formed by sedimentation about 2.8 billion years ago.
On the other hand, the globes, which have a fibrous structure on the inside with a shell around it, are very hard and cannot be scratched even by steel.
Though Marx went on to explain that the spheres had been explained as limonite concretions by a local geologist, they dismissed this explanation based on the low hardness of limonite compared to Marx's assertion that the stones could not be scratched even by steel.
This, plus the undeniable fact of the three parallel grooves, left them no explanations other than artificial manufacture by intelligent beings.
Other promotions in pop culture followed, driven by the mention in forbidden archaeology.
A 1996 television special, The Mysterious Origins of Man, described them as metallic spheres and reported that specialists had declared no natural process could account for the three lines.
In a 1979 article titled Strange Relics from the Depths of the Earth, creationist J.R. Yachmans explained why it's often creationists who promote these ancient advanced civilization claims.
What makes creationism distinctive from the other proposed models is it teaches that mankind existed on the earth before most geologic strata were formed.
What is more, he was created and lived as an intelligent civilized being from the outset.
The Genesis record describes how after creation and before the flood, the descendants of Adam, the antediluvians, possessed an advanced culture that included agriculture, urbanization, the arts, metalworking, and sophisticated engineering abilities.
The creation flood model can thus accept the appearance of human remains and advanced artifacts in the geologic past as evidence for pre-flood and immediate post-flood civilizations.
Because of the cataclysmic nature of the flood and the abruptness with which the Babel Ice Age disaster occurred, the creation flood model predicts further that buried artifacts are probably few and far between, appearing as rare surviving remnants in the rock, which is the case exactly.
Based on these findings, then, we must conclude that the creationist model is superior to all other models in supplying answers to the riddle of human remains and artifacts in the geologic record.
These strange relics from the depths of the earth, in fact, testify to the validity of the creation flood model and tend to prove wrong the major concepts of all other models so far proposed.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together, get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Rocks or Artificial Spheres 00:06:44
The most remarkable claim about the stones is that inside a display case at the Clerksdorp Museum, which is described as vibration-free, the stones are claimed to rotate about their axes with no external influence.
As this was widely repeated in articles and on websites about the stones, the source of this claim, Rolf Marx again, spoke up and said he'd been misquoted by a reporter.
In fact, the case was subject to the same vibrations that everything else in the museum was frequently subjected to, subterranean explosions in the local mines, which caused the stones in the case to roll around, not unexpectedly.
And perhaps this misquote is that place where we should draw our line between fact and fiction.
Because up until now, virtually everything about the stones has been either fabricated or misrepresented.
We can begin with their appearance.
None of them are perfectly spherical, or even anywhere in the neighborhood of it.
They are generally roundish in the way that many rocks are, particularly concretions.
Even the famous one with the three grooves is pretty squished.
You would never describe it as spherical.
They do not appear to be metallic.
Many may have higher concentrations of metals in their chemical makeup than others, but they all look and feel like rocks.
Simple chemical analysis has found they're mostly made of varying proportions of hematite, wollastonite, and pyrite.
The earlier identification reported by Marx as limonite is a more general term and is basically correct.
None of the stones has ever been found to be any harder on the Mohs scale than its chemical content would predict.
Concretions are nodules that form inside sedimentary rock.
If you've ever walked in a canyon with exposed rock faces, you've likely seen round rock inclusions in those faces.
Those were probably concretions.
Some are the result of mineral-rich water seeping through the sediment and precipitating into cavities where those minerals solidify around some nucleus.
Others are the result of impurities in the sediment that are squeezed out when that sediment undergoes metamorphosis.
And the Clerksdorp spheres are of this type.
As the pyrophyllite crystallized, various impurities were forced into voids where they coalesced with other minerals.
Since they are formed of random impurities in dispersed pyrophyllite deposits, the Klerksdorp spheres have varying chemical makeups and different appearances.
Some may be high in metal content, which is what's behind the early reports that these were metal balls.
The grooves are the result of layers in the sediment in which the concretions were formed.
Laminations between these layers were finer-grained than the layers themselves, and as the concretions grew within them, they grew faster against the coarser layers than against the finer laminations.
When we see a concretion with a groove around it, we're seeing the evidence of its slower growth against a lamination.
Stack several sedimentary layers, each with such lamine between them, and when a concretion forms across them, it might be lucky enough to have three parallel grooves or lines around its center, like that most often photographed Klerksdorp sphere.
No advanced machining by an ancient civilization needed.
So that's the science and the pseudoscience behind the Klerkstorp spheres.
There's nothing particularly new or surprising there.
If you've been listening to Skeptoid for any length of time, you already know that this is a pretty commonplace circumstance.
Something mundane gets exaggerated by pseudoscientists, and a whole legend builds up around it, despite there being really nothing of any particular interest there.
In fact, the Klerkstorp spheres are even less unique than you might think.
The fine grain of the Ottisdahl sediments means the grooves in the Klerkstorp spheres are the clearest I've been able to find, but other stones do have them, and from the exact same geological process.
Notable examples include the Moki marbles in the Navajo sandstone of southern Utah.
These concretions grew in much coarser sediment, so their lines are not nearly as perfect, but they're much larger and more pronounced.
Some Mochi marbles look like walnuts with great rough ridges around them.
Others have deep equatorial gouges.
Many have two or three ridges and gouges.
We've even found these on Mars.
Nicknamed Martian blueberries, these are hematite concretions found in large concentrations by the Opportunity rover.
Most are generally round, and some display the same ridges and gouges.
So-called button rocks, found in the Catskill Mountains of New York State, display very fine grooves and ridges.
While these rocks are not especially spherical, their overall shapes are like spinning tops and other things that look like they could have been made on a craftsman's lathe.
We also have innumerable examples of concretions far more spherical than anything found at Autostahl.
Famous examples of these include some very large ones found on some New Zealand beaches, which can be up to three meters in diameter.
The best of them can be astonishingly spherical.
There are also the cannonball concretions in the Cannonball River Valley of North Dakota in the United States.
They're aptly named, as a lot of them are just about the same size and spherical shape as cannonballs.
Yachman's explanation about why creationism best explains these alternative interpretations of common geologic artifacts also explains why extraordinary claims about everyday objects will probably always persist.
But strip the creationism arguments aside, and there's still reason to appreciate these stones and many other unusual byproducts of geophysical processes.
They're very cool.
Many are beautiful to look at.
Many prompt us to wonder how they came to be.
Appreciate the Klerkstorp spheres for what they are, not for what they are not.
We continue with the source of another claim made about the Klerkstorp spheres, that they were examined by NASA and declared to be unexplainable in the ad-free and extended premium feed.
Premium Feed and Support 00:02:21
To access it, become a supporter at skeptoid.com slash go premium.
A great big Skeptoid shout out to our premium supporters like Dale in Northern Michigan, Torin Quinliven, Dr. Jeff, and Tonya Marwood.
Are you getting the Skeptoid podcast companion email?
It comes out each week along with each new episode, featuring the wonder of the week, show notes, and much more.
If you don't, you're only getting half the show.
So come to skeptoid.com and click on podcast companion email.
And check out our 40-minute movie, Principles of Curiosity, that teaches the basics of scientific skepticism and critical thinking in a far-ranging journey that takes you from the depths of Death Valley to the highest points in space.
It's free on YouTube and at principlesofcuriosity.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection