All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Oct. 4, 2022 - Skeptoid
18:29
Skeptoid #852: Electric Cars and the Power Grid

Opponents of electric cars claim that the power grid can't keep up with the growing demand for electricity. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Debunking EV Grid Myths 00:14:44
Opponents of electric cars have a new argument that as EVs become more prevalent, the grids won't be able to keep up with the demand for more electricity.
Is there any truth to this, or is it just one more item on the long list of fossil fuel industry talking points?
We're going to find out today on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and we'll replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Electric Cars and the Power Grid If it seems like there are too many Skeptoid episodes about electric cars this year, that's because it's a show about popular myths.
And hardly any topic is more timely and popular as electric cars.
We have states and whole nations requiring that increasing percentages of new car sales be for zero-emission vehicles.
We have climate-driven heat waves putting extraordinary demand on power grids.
We have an election year when misinformation and disinformation tend to take over the news.
So yeah, electric cars are a hot topic right now.
And they are the subject of one of the most common new claims that as electric cars become more and more ubiquitous, power grids will not be able to keep up with the increased demand and everything will go to heck or something.
Is it true?
During an unprecedented heatwave in California in September of 2022, California issued a flex alert, which is a call to consumers to voluntarily reduce their energy usage.
Flex alerts are issued by an independent nonprofit called the California ISO, made up of representatives from the state's utilities and whose mission is to oversee the operation of the power grid to preserve its health.
A typical flex alert asks people to reduce their use of electricity during the peak consumption period of 4 to 9 p.m.
Normally this means requesting that people turn their air conditioning to no cooler than 26 degrees Celsius or 78 degrees Fahrenheit to avoid the use of major appliances washer-dryer, dishwasher, oven and stove, and to turn off unnecessary lights.
After several days of flex alerts, one came out that had a new item added to the list, a fourth priority, and that was charging electric cars.
If your car was low and you needed to charge it, the flex alert asked you to try and do so before 4 p.m. or after 9 p.m.
Well, social media went crazy.
It's no secret that electric cars are a political hot topic.
Many liberals love them, many conservatives hate them with a passion.
What many people think about electric cars is not determined by anything about the cars themselves, but by those people's own tribal identity.
A lot of those who hate electric cars were absolutely jubilant at this news, gleefully posting to social media that California's electric grid is now officially proven to be unable to support electric cars.
And conservative media did the same thing.
If you don't particularly like chocolate ice cream, and then there's a chocolate ice cream shortage, Do you go dancing in the streets celebrating that chocoholics can't have their favorite dessert?
No, you probably wouldn't care.
But it's different with electric cars because their very existence cuts some people down to the bone.
Now, normally at this point in an episode, we'd say, hey, let's look at the science and see what the facts are about electric cars in the power grid.
But this little episode in California really had much less to do with the facts of the situation than with political tribalism.
There's a gap between the facts of the power grid and the divisions that actually set people off.
And that's not good.
What's better is when people care more about facts and what's best for everyone.
So today we're going to set the political divisions aside, which is always a good idea no matter what, and focus instead on the science of this situation.
If it turns out that supporting a carbon-free transportation network is not going to be practical, or it will cause more harm than good, then I want to advocate against it.
But if it is practical, then it's clearly in everyone's best interest, so we should advocate for it.
With that in mind, let's look at the power grid, most particularly at California's power grid, because that's the one in question, and it's also the world's biggest electric car market so far.
The perfect test case.
It's worth noting that it wasn't until a single five-hour spell during California's worst heat wave ever that a request was made to voluntarily reduce electric car charging, and then only after already asking people not to cook with appliances and to set their homes to uncomfortably warm temperatures.
But there also aren't very many electric cars around yet.
California has about 575,000 of them registered as of this writing, more than 40% of all electric cars in the United States.
Right now, about 12.5% of all new cars sold in California are electric.
By 2026, California's new laws mean that percentage will triple to 35% by 2026, and triple again to 100% by 2035.
That'll be 2 million new cars every year added to California's grid, about four times as many as exist today, and that triggered that flex alert.
Okay, does that sound pretty horrifying?
If I'd said California will be adding 2 million iPhones per year, nobody would blink.
That's not a significant load on the grid.
But what if I said 2 million new residential air conditioners per year?
Would that worry you?
Would you panic about the ability of California's grid to keep up?
Most of us probably don't know because we don't really have much of a sense of that.
Also, there's a huge range.
There are new efficient air conditioners, old inefficient ones, some for big houses, some for small ones, and then everyone uses them differently, with some cranked super cold and some hardly touched.
But we do know that the average American home spends 6% of its energy usage on air conditioning and uses 11,000 kilowatt hours per year.
That comes to just under 2 kilowatt hours per day for air conditioning.
The average California driver logs 12,500 miles per year, or about 35 miles per day.
That's about 8 kilowatt hours for a Tesla Model 3, and that's about 4 times what the average California house uses on air conditioning.
Four times as much.
So, again, we have a conclusion that sounds horrifying.
How could any grid possibly keep up with that kind of expansion?
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
The answer is, and it may sound hard to believe at this stage, quite easily.
Since a home uses 11,000 kilowatt hours per year, that's 30 kilowatt hours per day, and the car adds only 8.
Give every single home in California an electric car, and you're only increasing the residential power requirement by 27%.
Not 400%, not 1,000%, 27%.
If you were to try and do that by 2035, residential grid capacity would only need to expand by 2% a year.
And there's more.
Only a fifth of California's grid capacity is residential.
Putting a new electric car into every single residential customer's garage by 2035 would require much less than a single percent increase annually.
Now, of course, the picture is not as simple as that.
There are countless complexities and variances.
Many buyers of new electric cars won't be able to charge at home.
They'll use public chargers at work or at stations.
A lot of people won't buy electric cars at all.
They'll hang on to their gassers.
Remember, the regulations don't ask anyone to get rid of their existing cars, and used gas car sales will continue as always.
Many of the cars sold to satisfy California's new regulations will be plug-in hybrids, not all-electric.
Most of these factors ease that hypothetical 1% annual demand increase.
The basic fallacy that the alarmists rely upon and that underlie their article's enormously inflated power demand estimates is the rather disingenuous assumption that every single electric car draws power from the grid at its maximum charging rate 24 hours a day every day.
It assumes none are ever parked or driven, but require full-time charging.
This is akin to claiming that gas cars need to constantly have gas pumped into them, all day, every day, without ever using any of it.
The truth is almost the exact opposite.
At any given time, the majority of electric cars, like all cars, are parked and not being charged.
Part of the rest of the time, they're being driven, and only the small remaining part of the time are they being recharged.
And of that, the vast majority is at a rate far lower than their maximum.
One anti-EV article by Reason says, if everybody in California went out and bought electric vehicles tomorrow, it would probably be an energy disaster.
A circumstance so absurd it scarcely warrants a reply.
It then goes on to parrot other popular anti-EV falsehoods, such as, millions of Californians won't and probably can't afford to transition to electric vehicles within the next 13 years.
As we discussed in episode number 844 on anti-EV myths, consumer reports found that despite a higher initial purchase price, total cost of ownership of the average electric car is $6,000 to $10,000 cheaper than the average gas car, resulting in lower, not higher, monthly expenses.
Make no mistake, the anti-EV lobby has few scruples when it comes to spreading propaganda to scare you away from going electric.
Regardless, it's a trivial matter for EV owners to not charge during peak hours, something they tend to avoid anyway because that's when rates are highest.
You simply tell your car what hours to charge during, plug it in, and forget about it.
Sometime during the night, your car's charger will click on, and you're ready to roll in the morning.
And you saved money doing it.
But moreover, it is the very fact that an electric car is basically just a giant battery on wheels that may turn out to be the healthiest thing for the grid.
It's called bi-directional charging, and some electric vehicles, such as the Ford F-150 Lightning, already support this.
What it means is that just as your house can power your car, so can your car power the house.
If there's a blackout and you have the right equipment installed, your house instantly switches over from drawing power from the grid to drawing it from your car.
You'd never even know anything had happened.
When power is restored, it switches back.
No more blackouts or brownouts ever for anyone with an electric car so equipped.
But taking it one more step is where things get really exciting.
It's called Vehicle to Grid, and it's already being tested around the world in partnerships such as California's joint program between General Motors and Pacific Gas and Electric.
In this scenario, if the grid gets close to maximum capacity, it can draw power from those plugged-in electric cars, whose owners opt in.
Vehicle to Grid Revolution 00:03:41
As few or as many as are needed, and access all the additional capacity they want.
Your electrical meter flows backwards, putting money in your pocket and relieving everyone of any power grid concerns.
This even covers the electric car owners who don't have garages and can't charge at home.
The many that can will be more than enough to support everyone.
Can the grid support electric cars?
Well, in the very near future, it's the electric cars that will be supporting the grid.
It's true that installing the equipment in your house will cost money.
It's true that upgrades to the grid infrastructure to support vehicle to grid will cost money.
But none of this is new or unexpected.
Everyone went through something similar when digital broadcasting replaced analog televisions, when personal computers took over the world and Wi-Fi was installed in every home and office, when we moved from landlines to cell phones, when air travel made us build expensive airports in every city, even going back to when cars replaced horses and the entire world had to be paved and equipped with traffic signals and painted lane lines and freeways and interchanges were constructed.
When the world first began to be electrified, its grid had to be built out and every home needed dramatic reworking to be electric.
Is anyone ruining that progression?
Every such investment throughout history has been more than worth it.
And this one will be too.
You know who else is worth it?
Why, Skeptoid's premium supporters, such as Ross Blotcher from the Oh No Ross and Carrie podcast, Larry and Christine, Jeff Gelbach of the Triangle Skeptics, and the mononymous Wayne.
What's up, Wayne?
Remember, Skeptoid is a 501c3 educational nonprofit.
We depend on your monthly micropayments to keep this content available to all the people out there who need it.
Join us in this mission.
Just come to skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
And follow us on your favorite social media for even more great content.
You'll find both Skeptoid and me, Brian Dunning, on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection