All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Sept. 6, 2022 - Skeptoid
16:23
Skeptoid #848: On the Trail of Papillon

How much truth was there to the prison escape story of Henri Charrière? Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Truth About Papillon 00:06:02
It became one of the great adventure movies of the 1970s, after having established itself as one of the great adventure books of all time.
The only problem with Papillon, the true life story of the prison breaks of Henri Charière at the infamous prison colony in French Guiana, turns out to be that there was probably very little truth to any of it.
Papillon is today unskeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's Hyperfixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
On the Trail of Papillon.
The 1973 movie Papillon told the story of a French petty criminal framed for murder and condemned to a life sentence of hard labor in the infamous penal colony of French Guiana.
The movie was released hot on the heels of its source material, the autobiographical book of the same name, by Henri Charière, whose tattoo of a butterfly on his chest gave his story its title.
Charière had lived the incredible tale of hardship, death, disappointment, and escape in that prison colony, and eventually made his way back to civilization and to France.
His book sales rapidly brought him fame and fortune such as he had never known.
But not everyone was so enamored.
A few journalists were skeptical, and their own books soon followed, books which claimed fatal flaws in Charière's narrative and charged him with fabrication.
Today we're going to look at these claims and at Charier's own and see if we can dig through this story of high adventure and find that line that separates fact from fiction.
When the movie came out in the United States in 1973, there was already quite a bit of controversy surrounding it, though this had mostly been known to the French-speaking audience and American audiences were scarcely aware of it.
The story's flamboyant author and hero, Henri Charière himself, who had served on the film crew as a technical advisor, probably attracted more media attention than the movie's stars, Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman.
Charière was in every production still, was interviewed in every Hollywood magazine, and was about town as a celebrity.
Though he spoke with scorn of the claims that his story was fabricated, it appeared that he relished the extra attention.
However, he felt he certainly seemed to enjoy the spotlight, no matter the intent behind its gaze.
The movie was a commercial success, though not an especially explosive one.
But beyond the numbers, it failed to impress.
Critics consistently found it boring.
It was lumbering.
It lacked passion.
It wasted the talents of its two superstars.
But half a century after its lackluster release, Papillon has achieved cult classic status among many.
It's definitely on my list of favorites, but whether it belongs on yours is up to you.
Charière's undisputed history began in Venezuela in the 1940s, where he landed after escaping French Guiana.
He was taken into custody and held under brutal conditions at a prison called El Dorado for a year.
But fate was on his side.
In 1945, a democratic coup d'état swept Venezuela, resulting in the replacement of all personnel at the prison.
Having no papers or proof of any sentence, Charière was freed and allowed to become a resident of Venezuela, and ultimately a citizen.
He lived in Caracas for more than 20 years as a restaurateur, marrying and raising a daughter.
Then in 1968, earthquake damage to his restaurant inspired him to look for a new source of income, and he decided to write Papillon.
Over three months, he filled 13 children's ruled notebooks with handwriting.
He sent it to a publisher in Paris.
It hit the bookshelves in 1969, and its sales were an overnight success.
In France, its first edition sold 1.5 million copies.
It was translated into English for the United Kingdom market in 1970 by the novelist Patrick O'Brien and into every other major language as well.
Papillon became the all-time best-selling book in Europe.
Due to the book's extreme popularity and Charière's claims of innocence therein, France pardoned Charier's murder conviction in 1970, clearing the way for him to legally return to Paris, a newly minted millionaire.
He began a lucrative acting career, writing and starring in a movie called Popsy Pop about a jewel thief, and his publisher squeezed a Papillon sequel out of him called Banco.
Almost immediately, two books came out in French, claiming to have thoroughly debunked the Papillon story, both written by investigative journalists who were skeptical of the tale.
The first, La Catre Vérité des Papillons, The Four Truths of Papillon, was by Paris match reporter Jean-Jean Ménagy and studied Charière's life in Paris before his conviction and found that he had badly misrepresented himself.
Debunking Devil's Island Myths 00:07:34
While Charière claimed to have been a small-time thief and safecracker, court records showed that he was in fact a police informant who made a living pimping out his wife.
For the second book, Papillé et Ponglais, Butterfly Pinned, journalist Gérard de Villiers actually traveled to French Guiana and examined prison records and interviewed other prisoners and former guards and found that virtually nothing Charière had claimed was true.
Far from being a serial escape artist, hell-bent on getting out at all costs, Charière had a relatively clean record showing only a single unauthorized absence in 11 years.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Malagas, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast, and this ship does always sell out.
Act now, or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com/slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com/slash adventures.
Perhaps the most dramatic location in the book was Devil's Island, one of a tight group of three tiny islands just off the coast, said to be where the worst of the worst prisoners were sent, the most violent or the most likely to attempt escape.
In the book's climax, Charière escaped Devil's Island by tossing a bag of coconuts off the island's tall cliffs, then using them as a raft to float back to the mainland, from where he eventually made his way to Venezuela.
Only, prison records showed that no Henri Charière had ever been sent to Devil's Island.
Why would he?
Devil's Island was for political prisoners only, supposedly to prevent them from spreading subversive propaganda.
Of 70,000 prisoners sent to the colony, only about 50 were ever sent to Devil's Island.
No murderers like Charière were among them.
Anyway, the islands have no tall cliffs.
They are small and low-lying, and their rocky shores slope gently down to the water.
Charière would have known these facts.
He did spend two years on one of the other islands, St. Joseph, close enough to Devil's Island that one could easily swim back and forth.
He was there to serve a two-year solitary confinement sentence for his one documented escape attempt.
Unlike the brutal conditions depicted in his book, prisoners were allowed out every day for exercise, including being allowed to swim.
Moreover, de Villier found that apart from Charière making the one attempt that landed him on St. Joseph, he was otherwise something of a model prisoner.
He was content in his job cleaning out latrines at the main prison facility in town, Saint-Laurent, and never caused any trouble.
According to other books written by former prisoners, such as 1988's dramatically titled Devil's Island Colony of the Damned and 1961's Flag on Devil's Island, most jobs at Saint-Laurent were pretty relaxed.
One author's job was as a portrait painter for the guards and their families.
Many non-troublesome prisoners came and went freely, working at menial jobs in town.
After all, the purpose of the prison was to transition prisoners into colonists.
De Villier also learned that some of the stories in the book did happen, but that Charière had not been involved in them.
These included the murder of a former convict who had turned man-hunter, a mass prison break called the Cannibal's Break because the escaping men killed and ate one of their own, and a case where Charière supposedly saved a guard's daughter from a shark attack at the beach on St. Joseph.
That did happen, but the prisoner actually responsible was attacked himself, losing one or both legs, and died soon after.
Then, in the 1990s, the original publisher of Papillon, Robert Lafont, dropped something of a bombshell in an interview.
When Charière first submitted his handwritten manuscript for publication, he presented it as a fictional novel.
It was Lafont who had persuaded Charière to call it an autobiography, a story they both stuck to until Charière died in 1973.
More trouble for Charière's story came out in 2005 when a 104-year-old decorated World War I hero named Charles Brunier went public with the claims he'd been making for years, that much of Charière's story was based on him.
Brunier, who had a butterfly tattoo on his left arm, said it was he who had been nicknamed Papillon, not Charière, and that much of the book had been lifted from stories he had told Charière in the 1930s.
Was either man's story true?
It's virtually impossible to verify.
But we do know that pretty much anytime something like this hits pop culture, there are always people who, quote, come forward out of the woodwork, claiming to have had some important role in the story.
Brunier presented no evidence other than his word.
So, who knows?
So how did Charière get to Venezuela?
Of course, no honest account survives, so we don't know any details.
But de Villier, based on his travels to French Guiana and the interviews he conducted there, pieced together a probable scenario.
At the time that France fell to the Nazis, French Guiana declared allegiance to Vichy, and Suriname, directly across the river from Salaron, was controlled by the Allies, and ceased cooperating with the prison and stopped returning escaped prisoners.
Charière probably did what a lot of the guys did, simply walked away from his job in town and hired a boat to row him across the river.
Once in Suriname, he had a relatively free road to Venezuela.
No dramatic high adventures needed.
And luckily, the Venezuelan coup that resulted in his official freedom and citizenship was just around the corner.
Embrace Skepticism Today 00:02:43
So have we shattered anyone's illusions and taken away a favorite story?
Well, I certainly hope not, because that would be a negative process.
Instead, we've just replaced one story with another, and both are equally filled with conflicts, just of a different kind.
Moreover, one is true, while the other is not.
So really, I think this has been a net positive.
You can still enjoy the movie.
It's not like based on a true story has ever been remotely true in movies.
And now you have another story that actually is true to enjoy on top of it.
So enjoy your fiction and enjoy your facts.
Just don't get them confused.
A great big Skeptoid shout-out to Premium supporters Michael Bigelow, Michael Maris, Eric Travis, and of course, Mobzy.
Premium membership is what keeps Skeptoid free for the millions of people out there who need it the most.
You can become a premium member at skeptoid.com.
Just click on Go Premium.
And remember, every Skeptoid episode has a transcript page at skeptoid.com with complete bibliographic references and further reading suggestions.
And they also print out into nicely formatted PDF documents that you can share.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection