All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Aug. 16, 2022 - Skeptoid
18:03
Skeptoid #845: Seeking the Soviet Battle Mole

The story goes that the Soviet Union had nuclear-powered underground vehicles for waging a whole new kind of war. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Soviet Nuclear Subterranean Tank Myth 00:06:16
Did the Soviet Union build a series of mighty nuclear-powered underground super tanks that drove through solid rock as easily as a submarine through water?
That's according to the urban legend.
Today we're going to see if this is fact or fiction, and just as a spoiler, it is a fact that the Americans had plans for something similar.
We're going to find out what today, on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Seeking the Soviet Battle Mole The year was 1964.
The place was the Earl Mountains in the Soviet Union.
Under Ludden's skies, the crew of five climbed aboard the gigantic vehicle, which looked something like a dark metal cigar, 35 meters long and 3 meters in diameter.
Its nuclear reactor, borrowed from the newest class of Soviet nuclear submarines, hummed to life.
Soon the mighty machine leapt forward and appeared to collide catastrophically with the face of a mountain, but instead, it seemed to melt right into the rock, using the nuclear reactor's extreme heat to literally melt its path into the mountain.
It disappeared into the solid surface like a snake into its burrow.
The team of engineers and military officers on hand ran over and stared into the gaping hole, its sides of hot glass glowing orange.
The rear end of the mechanical marvel could just be seen disappearing into the dark as the glass hissed and steamed and cooled.
The first test of the Soviets' so-called underground boat had been a success.
At least it was according to the story.
The star of their underground boat program was the vehicle they nicknamed the Battle Mole, and which the Americans termed a subterranean, descended from the Latin for underground.
Whether it ever existed is a big question, given that there's basically one single apocryphal story, found reproduced in books and on mostly Russian language websites, comprising the entirety of the evidence for it.
We'll have a more detailed look at that story in a moment.
But first, we should be clear on what we're talking about here.
Most everyone is familiar with the Tunnel Boring Machine, or TBM, used around the world for applications such as subterranean roadways, and first developed during the 1800s.
These are great big machines, assembled in place, with a great big cutter head with dozens of disc cutters to break away the rock, then transport the debris backwards along conveyor belts and into carts or trucks for removal.
Some simultaneously install concrete support plates as they inch forward.
The entire machine is on hydraulic legs and jacks that both move it along and keep forward pressure on the cutting head.
Conversely, a subterranean, in concept anyway, is a self-contained vehicle with independent mobility.
Its crew can jump in, drive around underground wherever they want, jump out, and do it again tomorrow.
It's a real autonomous vehicle, not a great clunky machine that has to be assembled and disassembled at job sites.
How independently mobile was the battle mole?
Following the success of the first test already described, a subsequent test was contrived.
This time the vehicle managed to travel 10 kilometers at what was described as great speed through all different types of geology, solid rock, broken rock, sand and gravel, melting each into a solid and incredibly strong tunnel wall, leaving no debris behind it.
But then, disaster struck.
The accounts say that the vehicle exploded in a thermonuclear fireball, deep underground, vaporizing its commander, Colonel Samon Budnyakov, and the rest of his crew.
The tunnel was thoroughly collapsed by the catastrophe, so no attempt was ever made to find the vehicle's remains, and the program was effectively terminated at that point.
Now, obviously, there are some implausibilities to this account, at least the way it's told.
If a fission reactor such as that from a submarine could be designed to generate sufficient heat to melt rock with extreme speed, there would have been no way to cool the machine or its occupants as it was encased within a molten-walled tunnel with nowhere to disperse waste heat.
It's physically impossible for the material melted from the tunnel to simply vanish and not fill the tunnel behind the vehicle.
And, of course, the big one, although a fission reactor can certainly melt down, it has no mechanism to generate any explosion other than a steam explosion.
Fission reactors have nothing in common with a device capable of triggering a thermonuclear explosion.
However, this is not a case where we just wave our hand and dismiss the story as simply made-up science fiction.
We can be absolutely assured that the Soviet nuclear subterranean was, at the very least, an absolutely serious concept.
How?
Because we know that it was an absolutely serious concept at the United States National Laboratories during the Cold War.
There are literally hundreds of published papers available at the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information, most of them created at Los Alamos in the 1970s.
Real Geothermal Tunnel Applications 00:03:54
One design is for a small coring device called a geoprospector, a hollow tube a mere 300 millimeters or one foot wide.
Made of either molybdenum or tungsten to withstand the 2,000 Kelvin heat of its 100 kilowatt electric heating elements at its leading edge, it would melt its way into the rock at half a millimeter per second and extrude a glass-encased sample core at its aft end.
A number of small-scale subterranes of this basic design were built and successfully tested.
Another design dubbed the subsaline was intended for use on the moon to create tunnels shielded from radiation for human habitation and transportation.
Like the Geoprospector, it was an uncrewed machine, but like the Battle Mole, it was powered by an onboard nuclear reactor.
Five meters in diameter, its 134 individual melting elements would be heated by liquid metal circulating from the onboard 400 megawatt reactor.
Its design speed was to tunnel 80 meters per day.
The melted rock would be used in two ways, to create a solid glass lining for the tunnel, and to create other, quote, useful forms, such as building materials, which would be extruded out the back of the machine as it goes.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
The largest design concept was a six-meter machine that would have been something of a cross between a subterrine and a TBM.
Nuclear-powered, this one melted and cut using the Kerf technique, meaning only the outer edge of the circular cutting head used heat from the reactor to melt the rock.
This melt was used to form the glass lining.
The rest of the rock was removed by conventional mechanical cutters, similar to a TBM, and the material was crushed into a slurry and piped out the back.
There are other reports covering the use of rock melting for creation of storage tunnels for nuclear waste, for accessing geothermal energy, for lining boreholes with glass far less expensively than conventional lining, for running underground power transmission lines, and other applications.
Missing American Battle Mole Designs 00:05:34
But nowhere in any of these hundreds of documents produced by the Los Alamos subterranean program was there a single design for a crude vehicle or a weaponized subterrine of any sort, or of anything that was magically free of the problem of debris removal, or of anything that moved freely through the rock at speeds useful for transportation or battle.
So here's what we have.
First, solid proof that subterranes were being taken seriously by the United States during the Cold War, which makes it a safe bet that their Soviet counterparts were doing the same.
Second, we have an urban legend about a successful Soviet subterranean that blew up.
Urban legends aren't proof of anything, especially ones that are full of so many implausible elements.
So we are faced with a perfectly plausible question.
Were the Soviet battle moles ever actually real?
Even the Russian language literature is very thin with information about the Soviet subterranean.
Those that are discussed bear little resemblance to the American designs.
They were enormous mega-machines, more like underground tanks than scientific instruments.
They rode on mighty tank tracks, and the concept drawings show giant conical drill heads at the front, like something from a Jules Verne novel.
There's no mention of them using reactor heat to melt the rock, only conventional cutter heads.
The earliest Soviet design was from the 1930s, the product of the engineer Alexander Trebilev, and is where the term underground boat came from.
Driven by a single operator, the boat was powered by electrical cables pulled behind it.
Its application was to go deep, drive around until it found an oil deposit, pulling a pipeline behind it all the way.
Trebolev's prototype never made it more than 12 meters before breaking down, and the project was abandoned.
After World War II, Nikita Khrushchev took a keen interest in developing exotic systems.
The Soviets had captured German plans for a subterranean called the Sea Lion that was never built, intended to take a crew of five under the English Channel, tunnel right underneath any target they chose, and plant a giant bomb.
It was completely impractical, but with the advent of nuclear reactors in the 1960s, Khrushchev took another look at it.
The idea would be to tunnel up to American underground missile facilities and command posts without being detected and blow them up.
This was to be the Battle Mole.
It had a crew of five, 15 armed troops, and one ton of explosives.
It used a conventional cutterhead powered by electricity from the reactor.
It moved at 7 kilometers per hour, a fast walking speed.
The tests, culminating with the disastrous one already discussed, are said to have taken place in 1964.
The accounts all end with Leonid Brezhnev coming to power shortly after the loss of the Battle Mole and the termination of the program, destruction of all materials, and the entire thing was classified.
It's a little too convenient of a way to end the story, as the lack of evidence moves the entire thing into the realm of faith.
And faith is where the entirety of the Battle Mole story remains.
While Trebelev's earlier unsuccessful machine is documented and known to have been real, no evidence has ever surfaced that the Battle Mole was ever built.
We already know that even today's best TBMs cannot come anywhere remotely close to 7 kilometers per hour, and any preliminary testing done by the Soviets would have taught them the same thing.
The American nuclear subterrane designs didn't come anywhere close to that speed either.
Nothing about the Battle Mole was practical.
Its original iteration in Russian language pulps gave it a conventional mechanical cutterhead, and its later American-style heating element to melt into the rock only appears in a few modern internet articles written after the Los Alamos subterranean program could inspire imaginative authors.
Given that storytellers have been free to take liberties of that magnitude with it, and given that the story ends with an assurance that no evidence will ever be forthcoming, we can rest assured that it probably never existed.
A final note is the Battle Mole's total lack of similarity to the American designs from Los Alamos.
Realistically, we would expect Soviet intelligence to have learned about the subterranes, and we'd also expect them to attempt something similar.
Whatever testing the Americans did, it's obvious that nobody cuts tunnels like this today.
We don't know why the melting technique didn't catch on.
Probably its problems didn't justify any efficiencies it may have had.
So, it's probable that the Soviets, assuming they did follow the American work, came to the same conclusion.
If they did, the 1970s were long after the Battle Mole's alleged 1964 misadventure.
So, it's yet another reason the entire story just doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
Enjoy a good piece of Jules Verne-style fiction for what it is.
But don't mistake it for historical fact.
Become a Skeptoid Premium Member 00:02:14
A great big Skeptoid shout out to premium supporters Taylor Hempel, Dan Pratt, Swiss file maker developer Christoph Kaufmann, and George Dunstan.
Want me to give you a shout out too?
It's really easy.
Just come to skeptoid.com and click on the members portal.
Inside there, navigate to shout-outs and stories, and you can tell me exactly what you want me to say in your shout-out.
There's also a place you can tell us your story, why you support Skeptoid, why you think critical thinking is important.
And if you like, you can opt to let us share your story with other prospective members, and even in some of our grant applications.
I can make the podcast, but it takes all of us working together to really do the work of promoting science literacy and critical thinking.
The members portal at skeptoid.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection