Skeptoid - Skeptoid #805: The Cottingley Fairies: Analysis of a Famous Hoax
Aired: 2021-11-09
Duration: 18:21


=== The Cottingley Fairy Hoax (08:02) ===

[00:00:03]  A famous set of black and white photographs show two young girls in a forested glen, posing with what appear to be some winged fairies.
[00:00:12]  For most of a century, the Cottingley fairies fooled some people who believed in them wholeheartedly, including Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, while at the same time leaving others smiling politely at the girls' obvious prank photos.
[00:00:27]  How can a hoax be both obvious and persuasive to so many at once?
[00:00:33]  The Cottingley Fairies are today on Skeptoid.
[00:00:40]  Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
[00:00:42]  You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
[00:00:46]  I'm doing something else now.
[00:00:48]  I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
[00:00:51]  On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
[00:00:55]  Some massive and life-altering and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
[00:01:00]  No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
[00:01:03]  That's Hyperfixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
[00:01:06]  Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
[00:01:16]  You're listening to Skeptoid.
[00:01:18]  I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
[00:01:21]  The Cottingley Fairies, Analysis of a Famous Hoax.
[00:01:27]  My first exposure to the Cottingley Fairies was as a young boy when I eagerly read about them in my book, Vampires, Zombies, and Monster Men.
[00:01:36]  Two young girls, who had been about the same age I was when I read about it, had taken a series of photographs between 1917 and 1920, showing themselves in the woods with little six-inch tall winged fairies dancing around and posing with them.
[00:01:53]  I always thought the pictures looked a little odd.
[00:01:55]  The fairies seemed flat and white, compared to the shaded three-dimensional girls and forest foliage.
[00:02:01]  However, the book also contained what was, to me, absolute proof that these photos did indeed show real fairy creatures.
[00:02:09]  And that's that the experts at Kodak had examined the negatives and found no evidence of fakery.
[00:02:16]  I considered myself skeptical, but obviously, to me, a 10-year-old boy's skepticism means nothing against actual photographic experts from the Kodak Company.
[00:02:29]  In 1983, 66 years after they took that first photograph, both women finally admitted they'd hoaxed the photographs, and you've likely heard that by now.
[00:02:39]  I'm leading with it because it's no great surprise, and also because it's hardly the interesting part of the story.
[00:02:46]  Let's start with what happened at the time, and with what was publicly known.
[00:02:53]  The two girls were Elsie Wright, 16 years old in 1917, and her cousin Frances Griffiths, six and a half years younger, who had just moved from South Africa with her mother.
[00:03:04]  The two girls liked to play in the wooded glen just behind the Wrights' home, which was in the village of Cottingley in Bradford, West Yorkshire, England.
[00:03:13]  Elsie's parents, Arthur and Polly Wright, played a significant role.
[00:03:18]  Arthur was an amateur photographer and had his own dark room.
[00:03:21]  Elsie had learned it all well enough that she had a job working in a local photographer's studio.
[00:03:27]  She was also a very good artist.
[00:03:30]  So when she and Francis reported fairies in the glen, Arthur let her borrow his camera to take a picture, which he developed.
[00:03:39]  The first photo became the most famous.
[00:03:41]  It shows young Francis wistfully staring while four little fairies dance in front of her, one playing some sort of flute or horn.
[00:03:49]  Well, Arthur recognized his daughter's artwork quite easily, which shouldn't surprise anyone who's ever had a daughter.
[00:03:55]  She'd drawn and colored the fairies, cut them out, and the girls had used hat pins to affix them to the foliage, and they then took the picture.
[00:04:04]  Arthur was well aware of his daughter's creativity, art ability, and photographic skills, even that she was experienced at manipulating photographic plates in the shop where she worked.
[00:04:14]  To him, this was a fun example of his daughter's creative skills.
[00:04:19]  Polly, however, took a very different view.
[00:04:22]  She was an ardent theosophist, sort of an occult spiritualist type of Christian.
[00:04:27]  And the idea of fairies appearing to her daughter meant, in her view, that her daughter was extraordinarily strong spiritually, and so it was an idea she was quite receptive to.
[00:04:38]  Two months later, the girls produced a second photo, this time showing Elsie sitting on the grass with a single gnome rather than a string of fairies.
[00:04:49]  Two years later was when everything blew up.
[00:04:53]  Polly Wright attended a lecture on fairies at the Theosophical Society and brought the two photographs with her.
[00:04:59]  They created quite a stir, the belief being that the girls emanated ectoplasm powerful enough for the fairies to attain visible form when the girls were present.
[00:05:10]  This represented a powerful piece of evidence in favor of the Society's brand of theosophy, and so they were exhibited at the Society's annual conference a few months later.
[00:05:20]  There, Edward Gardner, one of the leading theosophists of the day, took charge of the case.
[00:05:27]  He had one of his colleagues, Harold Snelling, who was also a photographer, examine them.
[00:05:32]  Snelling found the negatives had not been tampered with and did indeed represent whatever had been in front of the camera, but he stopped short of commenting on what that might have been.
[00:05:42]  Snelling also produced new negatives which he enhanced or clarified.
[00:05:48]  It's not recorded exactly what he did to them, to produce better quality reproductions.
[00:05:55]  This was when Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the celebrated creator of Sherlock Holmes, came into the story.
[00:06:01]  As discussed in Skeptoid number 430 on his long friendship and rivalry with Harry Houdini, Sir Arthur had converted to spiritualism during World War I and was so profoundly persuaded of the reality of the supernatural that he led a mass exodus of members from the Society of Psychical Research because it was too skeptical.
[00:06:23]  Sir Arthur was preparing an article on fairies, heard about the photos, and contacted Gardner.
[00:06:29]  They took the photographs to more photographic experts, intent on having them somehow certified as authentic.
[00:06:36]  The technicians at Kodak found the same thing as Snelling had, and declined to issue a certificate of authenticity because whether the fairies are real or paper was outside their scope.
[00:06:48]  Technicians at the film manufacturer Ilford wouldn't even say that much, stating only that there appeared to be some evidence of tampering.
[00:06:56]  Sir Arthur even got a rejection from a fellow spiritualist, the physicist Sir Oliver Lodge, who identified the photos wrongly as double exposures using a troop of dancers playing the fairies.
[00:07:10]  So contrary to what the books had told me when I was a boy, it was not true that no photography experts considered them to have been faked.
[00:07:20]  In fact, the truth was almost the opposite, that no photography experts were willing to certify them as genuine.
[00:07:28]  Gardner personally visited the girls in 1920, now three years after the two famous photos.
[00:07:35]  He gave Francis and Elsie each a W. Butcher and Sons Cameo folding plate camera, each with 12 photographic plates that were secretly marked, so that Gardner was later able to verify the girls had used the film provided.
[00:07:51]  Though Elsie's father, Arthur Wright, continued to maintain his belief that Elsie had drawn the figures and cut them out, Gardner and Elsie's mother Polly were not deterred.
[00:08:02]  The girls were left alone to take further photos unsupervised.

=== Silent Skeptics and Files (07:48) ===

[00:08:06]  The girls said the fairies wouldn't appear if anyone else was around.
[00:08:10]  And this actually concurred with the theosophical belief that the ectoplasm wouldn't be strong enough to make the fairies visible if anybody was around who was less spiritual than the girls.
[00:08:27]  In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
[00:08:34]  Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
[00:08:48]  And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
[00:08:59]  It's an easy ask.
[00:09:00]  Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
[00:09:04]  By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
[00:09:12]  Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
[00:09:18]  You can even use the telephone.
[00:09:20]  I know that might sound crazy.
[00:09:22]  It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
[00:09:26]  I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
[00:09:30]  The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
[00:09:32]  When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
[00:09:37]  And that's how we shape a better future.
[00:09:39]  In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
[00:09:46]  Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
[00:09:51]  Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
[00:10:04]  To make a long story short, three more photographs were taken with the new cameras.
[00:10:09]  One each of each girl, now three years older, each shown with a single fairy.
[00:10:15]  A third photo was of some of the fairy cutouts positioned by themselves in some tall grass, and it arguably looks the best of all five photos.
[00:10:24]  Gardner sent Prince to Sir Arthur, then in Australia.
[00:10:28]  He wrote back, My heart was gladdened when out here in far Australia, I had your note and the three wonderful pictures, which are confirmatory of our published results.
[00:10:40]  When our fairies are admitted, other psychic phenomena will find a more ready acceptance.
[00:10:46]  We have had continued messages at seances for some time that a visible sign was coming through.
[00:10:53]  Public interest in the fairies ran high upon the publication of Sir Arthur's 1921 book, The Coming of the Fairies.
[00:11:01]  But as with all things, it soon waned.
[00:11:04]  Interest in the fairies also waned for Elsie and Francis, who were once again given cameras and film by Gardner, but took no more photos, and both distanced themselves from the whole episode.
[00:11:18]  That was where the story sat for another 40 years.
[00:11:21]  Both girls had married, moved away, and had careers and full lives.
[00:11:26]  Then in 1966, reporters began harrying Elsie.
[00:11:31]  She told the Daily Express tabloid that the fairies were, quote, figments of her imagination.
[00:11:38]  She said the same thing in a television interview in 1971, and then again in 1976.
[00:11:44]  By then, Elsie and Francis were both publicly non-committal on the reality of fairies, but both still insisted the photos were genuine, statements which are obviously in conflict.
[00:11:57]  But it was 1978 when the heat was turned up for real.
[00:12:02]  James Randy himself, champion of all fake busters, led an investigation.
[00:12:08]  Among the things Randy found was a set of illustrations in a 1914 children's book titled Princess Mary's Gift Book.
[00:12:16]  The pictures showed women in poses precisely identical to all the fairies Elsie had drawn and cut out.
[00:12:24]  Elsie had added fairy wings, but that was it.
[00:12:28]  Otherwise, Elsie's poses and flowing gowns were just as they were in the book.
[00:12:33]  Without any credible doubt, Elsie had copied the illustrations in the book.
[00:12:38]  Francis, then 75 years old, wrote in a personal letter to Randy in 1983, From where I was, I could see the hat pens holding up the figures.
[00:12:49]  I've always marveled that anybody ever took it seriously.
[00:12:53]  There were other skeptical investigations and other articles over the years.
[00:12:58]  And in 1983, shortly before her death, Elsie Wright went public in an interview published in a magazine called The Unexplained.
[00:13:06]  Something of an ironic title in this case.
[00:13:09]  Her father, Arthur, had been spot on from the beginning.
[00:13:13]  She'd copied the drawings from the book, cut them out, affixed them to the foliage with hat pins, and snapped the photos.
[00:13:20]  Francis, on the other hand, concurred on all points but one.
[00:13:24]  She insisted until she died that the fifth photograph of the fairies in the tall grass was genuine.
[00:13:33]  So how and why did they decide to hoax the world?
[00:13:38]  By all accounts, the girls were both frightened and embarrassed that they'd fooled Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the most famous author in Britain, perhaps in the world, and universally considered a brilliant man.
[00:13:50]  The two young girls didn't know what to do, and so they remained silent.
[00:13:55]  As Elsie explained in these latter years, Sir Arthur had lost his son recently in the war, and I think the poor man was trying to comfort himself in these things.
[00:14:05]  So I said to Francis, We're a lot younger than Conan Doyle, so we will wait until they die of old age, and then we will tell.
[00:14:14]  Later speculation, totally unevidenced, incriminates Arthur Wright as well.
[00:14:20]  Perhaps he took the pictures himself, and concerned over having defrauded a luminary like Sir Arthur, also remained silent.
[00:14:29]  There is still one hanging thread to this story.
[00:14:32]  Two other fairy photographs were taken by an unknown photographer in 1918 and published in a magazine called The Sphere.
[00:14:41]  Their style is clearly different from the Cottingley photographs.
[00:14:45]  Fairies surround an unidentified girl, about the same size as the Cottingley fairies, but much more naturally lighted and better blended into the foliage than the Cottingleys.
[00:14:55]  Was Arthur part of a ring of fairy photographers at the same time and place in history?
[00:15:01]  So far, we don't know enough to speculate any further.
[00:15:06]  It's often said that young Francis and Elsie's pictures fooled some of the greatest minds of the day.
[00:15:13]  Well, no, they didn't.
[00:15:15]  Sir Arthur and any other great minds who believed the pictures were genuine didn't get fooled.
[00:15:21]  They fooled themselves.
[00:15:24]  These were people who were already fully invested in the reality of fairies and in the ectoplasm necessary to make them take form, and who were on the hunt for any evidence supporting that, to help win over the rest of us to their view.
[00:15:38]  Sir Arthur had been hopelessly trapped in a spiral of confirmation bias, both seeing and seeking only information that confirmed his preconceived conclusion and ignoring or dismissing everything that did not.

=== Premium Support Keeps Us Afloat (02:27) ===

[00:15:54]  No matter how famous of an author you are or are not, the same can happen to you and to any of us.
[00:16:00]  The Cottingley Fairies are yet one more example of why we must all always be skeptical.
[00:16:13]  A great big Skeptoid shout out to our premium supporters like Elf Hedlund from Stockholm, Sweden, Jesse G. Donot, Saber Wolfie, and Jan in Finland.
[00:16:25]  Currently teaching from home.
[00:16:27]  It's a good gig if you can get it.
[00:16:28]  Your premium membership is what keeps us afloat.
[00:16:32]  If you love the show, then make this a two-way street.
[00:16:35]  For just $5 a month or more, tax deductible for U.S. taxpayers, you can help ensure that this material is out there for those who need it for years to come.
[00:16:46]  Just come to skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
[00:16:50]  And be sure to catch In Fact, our YouTube video series based on selected Skeptoid episodes.
[00:16:57]  Find it at infactvideo.com.
[00:17:03]  You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
[00:17:06]  I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
[00:17:15]  Hello, everyone.
[00:17:16]  This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
[00:17:24]  And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
[00:17:33]  And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
[00:17:37]  And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
[00:17:42]  Why support Skeptoid?
[00:17:43]  If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, premium is for you.
[00:17:50]  If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
[00:18:04]  Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
[00:18:08]  Next to giggling, of course.
[00:18:10]  Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
[00:18:21]  From PRX.