All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Aug. 3, 2021 - Skeptoid
17:27
Skeptoid #791: Dowsing: Water Witchcraft

If you need to find ground water, ask a hydrologist, not an occult magician. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Dowsing vs Global Warming 00:07:06
As global warming causes some places to get wetter, it causes others to get drier.
And in these places, water is becoming so scarce that people are willing to try anything, whether it's based on folk wisdom or even on magic.
Today we're going to see how one such method stands up to science.
Dowsing.
Coming up next on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Dowsing Water Witchcraft It seems as though we might be seeing more and more Skeptoid episodes about water far into the future, as global warming drives our annual weather extremes to crazier and crazier levels.
Areas with flooding can expect to see more and worse floods throughout this century.
Areas with drought can expect to see even less rainfall and drier weather, and people will be driven to more remote limits in search of solutions.
One example we're seeing right now is increasing reliance on the paranormal in the search for water, as some in drought-stricken areas are turning in desperation to water dowsers.
Holding their divining rods in front of them as they pace carefully across your property, these practitioners of the ancient occult ritual have persuaded paying customers, and in many cases, themselves as well, that they are truly channeling some supernatural influence.
Today we're going to look into the real success rate and the claims, including by some that it's science-based, of the water witches.
Let us first get one thing off the table, the thing that experienced skeptics probably suspected this episode would be all about, and that's the conventional explanation that dowsing is explained by the idiomotor effect.
There is a complete skeptoid episode on the ideomotor effect, number 451, if you'd like a true deep dive, but the short explanation is that it's our body's tendency to make tiny involuntary movements in response to some stimulus, often but not always, with our being unaware of it.
We all do it, as it's a normal body function.
Sports fans might make small muscle movements in harmony with the athletes they're watching.
Players of the Ouija board, the ones who aren't cheating and moving the plan shut deliberately, might see it creep toward some expected letter on the board.
We might tap our feet to music even when we're trying to be quiet audience members.
When we're sitting at a table with someone we respect, we might unconsciously mimic their body language or gestures or the way they sit.
These are all various manifestations of the idiomotor effect.
But the most famous example given in all the textbooks is that of dowsing.
Dowsers contend with a multitude of stimuli, all competing to influence those delicately balanced sticks.
They're usually walking, so have to counteract that body movement.
There might be wind or uncertain footing.
But most of all, there are expectations.
The dowser knows that anyone else present has expectations of the sticks moving or not, triggering a cacophony of conflicting impulses within the dowser's brain.
But mostly they have their own expectations, and these come at many levels.
They often have knowledge of where water is and is not found in that area, and experience with how deep wells go there.
They have some experience with geography in general that tells them where water is more or less likely located.
Sometimes they may even have specific foreknowledge.
And as human beings, they're buffeted by nonspecific intuition.
Somehow, the cognitive centers in the dowser's frontal lobe has to manage all of these stimuli, and the manifestation of the ideomotor effect is a question of when, not if.
There hasn't been any scientific doubt for many decades that the ideomotor effect is responsible for the entirety of movements made by dowsing rods during a dowsing session.
But while that's interesting and educational, it doesn't explain this resurgent tendency of intelligent adults in the 21st century to place so much faith on a practice that's usually presented openly as occult magic.
The other thing you've probably heard about dowsing and that you expected this episode would be all about is that dowsers always fail in controlled tests of their abilities.
This is quite true.
Dowsers have been put to the test many times, both by credulous experimenters and by skeptical experimenters, and the results are always the same.
The better the experimental controls, the worse the results.
For some examples, the Wikipedia page for dowsing includes a long list of such tests.
Nevertheless, believers in dowsing continue to tout the positive results shown in poorly controlled tests, and or misrepresent negative results in better controlled tests as positive results.
Perhaps the most famous of these latter instances took place in Munich in the late 1980s and was led by Hans Dieter Betz, a lifelong believer in divination and a now retired professor of experimental physics.
He has devoted the latter half of his life to his belief that not only people, but also objects, radiate with mystical energy fields, beyond the knowledge of science, that can be detected using dowsing techniques.
Thus, he was hardly an unbiased researcher for this study.
This dowsing experiment was funded by a 400,000 Deutschmark grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, and was preceded by a public statement from the experimenters that dowsing is probably real, and they were setting out to prove it.
A two-story barn was used.
The dowsers performed their feat up on the second story, while on the ground floor below, a cart holding a pipe of flowing water was placed somewhere along a 10-meter center line, offset to the left or right of that line by a distance determined each time by a random number generator.
To the credit of Betz and his colleagues, the experiment was double-blinded, and they even had a professional magician on hand with the right skill set to look for opportunities for the dowsers to cheat.
Bucket List Adventure at Sea 00:02:14
500 dowsers participated in a preliminary round, but their results were hopelessly random and showed no dowsing ability at all, even though blinding was not yet employed in this round, and the dowsers were given feedback with each guess to help them.
The experimenters were not deterred.
They studied the data and selected 43 dowsers whose results were the best.
Of course, necessarily, in every set of random data, there is going to be 43 who are closest to the mark.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
USGS Pamphlet Clears the Air 00:05:46
These 43 then underwent 843 individual tests with the full double blinding protocol in place.
Again, the results were consistent with random chance, with no pattern of hits at all.
But the experimenters were still not deterred, and they did the same thing they did at the end of the previous round, selected the top six, whose random results happened to be closest to correct, for a third round of testing.
Unfortunately, in this third round, all six dowsers produced results that were actually worse than random chance.
Later analysis showed that if they'd all simply guessed the pipe was running straight down the middle of the floor, which it hadn't been, all six would have done better.
Nevertheless, the experimenters declared these six to be proof that dowsing works.
In their paper published in the Ministry's Journal in 1990, they stated, dowser phenomena can be regarded as empirically proven.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation, professor of physiology and data analyst Dr. Jim Enright published a response in which he savaged not the experimental protocol, which was reasonably solid, but this absurdly invalid interpretation of the results.
By his analysis of the data, even these best six results were nothing other than empirical disproof of dowsing.
His central finding was that the allegedly positive result was purely a Texas sharpshooter fallacy.
Imagine someone firing a machine gun randomly at the side of a barn and then afterwards drawing a target around the three bullet holes that are most closely grouped.
It's essentially what the Munich experimenters did.
They had no criteria for what would constitute a successful result for any given dowser.
Instead, all they did was collect a huge amount of random data, draw a circle around the ones they liked the best, and then characterize those as representative of the phenomenon's accuracy.
This triggered a back and forth in the German literature that lasted for years.
The experimenters responded to the response, touting the statistical significance of the six results.
And Enright countered back again that using only a preferred subset of the total results does not represent those results.
Neither party is likely to persuade the other.
To date, the Munich study remains the only large-scale published test of dowsing in which any number of legitimate academics has endorsed as successful, even though those academics professed their belief and their intended outcome before the test even began, and then used highly questionable analysis to support their preordained result.
Nevertheless, public interest in dowsing remains, and the global warming-caused drought in the western United States and many other places around the world drives further interest in outside-the-box methods of finding water.
It's to the point that the U.S. Geological Survey actually publishes a pamphlet titled simply Water Dowsing to Clear the Air.
But get this, it was originally published in 1977 and hasn't had to be updated yet.
Why not?
Because there's nothing new to say on the subject.
Dowsing isn't science, it's magical divination, and divination isn't exactly something where new discoveries are published, peer-reviewed, and experimentally replicated.
So much so, in fact, that this pamphlet refers the reader who wants to learn more to another USGS publication, The Divining Rod, A History of Water Witching, published in 1917.
No doubt the world is full of reports that contracted water witches successfully found water on someone's property.
The USGS pamphlet explains that accordingly.
In a region of adequate rainfall and favorable geology, it is difficult not to drill and find water.
Some water exists under the Earth's surface almost everywhere.
This explains why many dowsers appear to be successful.
To locate groundwater accurately, however, as to depth, quantity, and quality, a number of techniques must be used.
Hydrologic, geologic, and geophysical knowledge is needed to determine the depths and extent of the different water-bearing strata and the quantity and quality of water found in each.
Combine this with the fact that most professional dowsers work in certain geographic locales where their experience has made them familiar with where wells will generally succeed and how deep water is generally found.
And there's no need to introduce any magical elements into those many stimuli discussed earlier for dowsing to appear to work.
And just to be clear, because they are the USGS, they also provide plenty of information and resources on how you can actually locate groundwater as a functional, intelligent 21st century adult who is not, for real, investing money and neuron cycles in magic.
It goes without saying that just because no remotely compelling evidence of the effectiveness or reality of dowsing has been found yet, that it won't be found tomorrow.
But some would say the allowance for potential future evidence is an equivocation.
It's based on literally prehistoric beliefs in the occult and witchcraft.
And we don't need a skeptoid episode to tell us that's part of the human experience with its roots in aspiration, not in reality.
If you need water, and it's no longer the year 1200, please call a hydrologist, not a necromancer.
You know who else doesn't call necromancers?
Support Skeptoid and Teachers 00:02:17
Skeptoid's premium supporters like Francisco Gutierrez, Lucy Franklin, my favorite Fiona C in Scotland, and most importantly, Matt P, as he is listening in the car with the Skeptlets, a crucial human pursuit.
Skeptoid Media is a 501c3 educational nonprofit.
We depend on your monthly micropayments to help keep this content available to all the people out there who need it.
Join us in this mission.
Just come to skeptoid.com and click Go Premium to get your shout out and member benefits, like the ad-free episodes.
Or are you an educator?
Have you seen our Teachers Toolkit?
It's a way to share all the best Skeptoid episodes with your classroom in a secure and controlled way.
Come and check out our three-minute video explainer to see how it works at skeptoid.com slash teachers.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrian Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection