All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 14, 2020 - Skeptoid
19:40
Skeptoid #736: New World Tobacco in Old World Mummies

Some believe that traces of tobacco in Egyptian mummies prove the Egyptians were first to the New World. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Tobacco in Egyptian Mummies 00:09:08
Fans of alternative sciences and alternative histories are often trying to upend any standard model of what we know about our world and our history.
So it's no surprise that plenty of attention has been given to a claim that Egyptian mummies have been tested and found to contain tobacco, which did not grow in ancient Egypt.
And therefore, our entire understanding of human history must be wrong.
Today we're going to see if this really is the conclusion we're forced to land upon, or if real science gives us a real explanation that actually meshes well with what we've already learned.
New World Tobacco in Old World Mummies is coming up next on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and we'll replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
New World Tobacco in Old World Mummies Today we have a good old-fashioned classic detective story.
By way of background, we know that ancient Egyptians never traveled to the Americas.
We also know that tobacco was a plant definitely not found in Egypt at that time in history.
Thus, common wisdom has always held that there's no way tobacco could have been found in either the written records of ancient Egypt or in its many archaeological relics.
But what if it had?
What if we discovered tobacco in ancient Egypt?
This is where our detective story begins.
If the seemingly impossible has happened, then something is very wrong somewhere.
We need to find the undiscovered explanation.
And to give a colorful taste of adventure to our story, we'll recall Tor Heyerdahl's 1970 voyage in the Raw II, a boat made of papyrus using only ancient Egyptian methods and materials.
In it, Heyerdahl and his small crew sailed 6,000 kilometers across the deep blue Atlantic from Morocco to Barbados, theoretically proving the plausibility of direct contact between ancient Egypt and the New World.
Archaeologists have never found Egyptian artifacts in the New World and also have never found Native American artifacts in Egypt, nor any other evidence of contact between the two.
Typically, such evidence does exist from all ancient cultures who actually did interact, and so we've omitted the Egyptians as candidates for the first non-indigenous to visit the New World.
As discussed in Skeptoid number 387, that honor belongs to the Vikings, who established small settlements on the North American coast in about the year 1000 CE, some 500 years before Columbus.
But in 1997, the Discovery Channel aired a program called Curse of the Cocaine Mummies, which sensationalized the idea that the pharaohs were all junkies.
More than anything else, This program is what inserted this largely unscientific belief into pop culture.
The show told the story of Svetlana Balabanova, a German toxicologist who discovered nicotine, and also trace amounts of cocaine and hashish, in an Egyptian mummy.
The TV show, in a somewhat transparent bow to sensationalism, focused largely on the cocaine to make its point that the pharaohs went around high all day, and then went on to characterize this as proof of ancient trade between Egypt and the New World.
Therefore, the history of the New World, as everyone knows it, is wrong.
Unfortunately, such disingenuous promotion of a largely discredited fringe theory is what we've come to expect from the pseudoscience and pseudo-history networks on TV.
Today, if you do a Google search for the terms tobacco and mummy, you will find that apparently everyone accepts without question that Egyptian mummies were loaded with tobacco and must have had first contact with the New World.
This belief is nearly entirely absent from the academic literature, but its penetration into pop culture appears to have been successful.
Balabonova's story was real, though.
She actually did do this work five years earlier in 1992.
Fourteen years before that, a brief anonymous letter had appeared in the Anthropological Journal of Canada titled simply, Tobacco in Egypt, which pointed out that tobacco residue was often found in Egyptian mummies and left the reason open as something of a mystery.
Later publications had found tobacco beetles, pests of the tobacco plant, inside the mummy of Ramses II.
It seemed to prove beyond any doubt that the ancient Egyptians must have had tobacco.
Although Balabanova was a modern forensic toxicologist and had little experience with mummies or archaeology, she acquired permission to test the hair of Henut Taoui, a priestess about whom nothing is known other than she died and was mummified around 1000 BCE.
Balabanova found high levels of nicotine, plus the traces of cocaine and a few other compounds, in Hainut Taui's body, and with the help of a pair of academics, got a one-page article published in the German language journal Natur Wissenschaften.
Today, Balabanova's article, First Identification of Drugs in Egyptian Mummies, remains one of the foundations of this particular alternate history community, and was the impetus for the Discovery Channel's program.
However, the paper's rejection by the scientific community was both immediate and nearly universal.
Her paper was published in volume 79 of Natur Wissenschaften.
Volume 80 included no less than five responses from various scientists, all of whom essentially savaged her work.
It was unfortunate, but not too surprising.
She was a modern toxicologist, not an archaeologist, and with little experience relevant to ancient mummies.
Yet she was aware that there's no evidence that ancient Egyptians ever smoked.
So she proposed that perhaps they had burned the tobacco to fumigate insects and thus received heavy systemic doses of nicotine throughout their body tissues.
Well, nobody bought this suggestion.
First, because pharaohs were unlikely to be personally involved in the dirtiest part of fumigation efforts so often that their corpses were more heavily laden with nicotine and its byproducts than today's lifelong heavy smokers.
Second, because tobacco was unknown to the Egyptians, as tobacco wasn't even introduced to Europe until 1519, when it came back from the Caribbean colonies founded by Columbus.
But third, because there was a far more likely cause for tobacco to be present in the mummies.
Much has been published on the probable cause for tobacco, cocaine, and other chemicals found in mummies from times and places where those compounds were unknown.
But one of the best and most widely cited was published in 2001 in the journal Antiquity.
It was authored by archaeologist Paul Buckland and paleoecologist Ava Panayitakopulyu, who specialized in the use of insects in paleoenvironmental interpretation.
Their paper was titled Ramses II and the Tobacco Beetle.
The Importance of Skepticism 00:07:44
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Let us note that until about 75 years ago, archaeology was done horribly.
For many in the profession, archaeology was about profiteering, at least as much as it was about science.
Conservation of specimens was rudimentary at best.
Records were often non-existent, even in the case of prominent mummies like Ramses II.
Buckland and Panayitakopulu noted, The case of Ramses II is particularly complex.
He had a long and active reign before being mummified in 1219 BC.
Since then, his biography has continued to be eventful.
moved to different tombs twice during the New Kingdom, he was exhumed in 1883 at Deir el-Bari, moved five times from Bulak to the Kedev's Palace to the Cairo Museum and to a house behind the museum, before his trip to Paris in 1975, and finally back to the National Museum in Cairo.
All provided opportunities for contamination and intervention.
It is only over the past 50 years that adequate records of conservation histories have been normal, and most specimens are less well documented than Ramses.
It's also worth noting that during all those moves, and throughout many of the enclosing decades, many of the people who worked on Ramses II or were in his vicinity smoked like chimneys.
Because of this alone, no matter what may have happened during Ramses' lifetime or at other later periods, we absolutely expect that Balabanova's analysis would have found nicotine.
But even this fact is not considered the primary cause.
Buckland and Panayi Takupulyu also pointed out, Archaeologists have sometimes been too credulous of apparently scientific data and have failed to appreciate the post-excavation histories of artifacts, including mummies.
And what did that post-excavation history include?
Mummies are often found to have insect damage and sometimes even active infestations.
A 2014 paper in the International Journal of Conservation Science said, A wrapped mummy may have areas on the surface which appear to have been attacked by insects, such as moth larvae, or there may be small distinctive holes indicating penetration to some depth below the surface.
If a mummy is being unwrapped, similar holes may be found in the deeper layers of bandages.
It is also possible to find the remains of insects between the many wrapping layers.
Beetles may have infested bodies at the time of death, during embalming, in the tomb, during transportation, or even in the museum.
To counter this, archaeologists and museum curators would virtually always treat mummies with an insecticide.
And back in the day, among the most common was powdered tobacco, applied either in solution with water or sprinkled in dry to act as a prophylactic.
Tobacco has been used in this way as an insecticide since about the year 1700.
A mummy purchased in the 1820s was known to have been treated with a solution of tobacco water.
And in 1995, a radioimmunoassay was performed on it to study how the nicotine was distributed in its tissues as a result of that treatment.
The finding was that the nicotine had thoroughly penetrated the tissues, including the hair, giving results essentially identical to what Balabanova and others had found in the mummies they'd tested.
It's a virtual certainty that this was done with at least most of the mummies in which Balabonova found nicotine, which was about two-thirds of those she tested.
But, of course, we don't know for sure because of the lack of records.
Since the mummy she focused on in her initial paper, Hanut Taoui, was laden with nicotine, then we can safely conclude it had been treated in this common way.
There's no need to do what so many have done, which is to insist that the only possible explanation is that ancient Egyptians had trade contact with the New World, a prospect which would be nearly impossible to shoehorn into the known and evidenced histories of so many cultures.
Mummies like Ramses II that were treated with tobacco powder are also the probable reason that tobacco beetles took up residence in them.
The beetles were attracted by the tobacco applied in the 19th century in Europe, not 3,000 years ago in Egypt.
The tobacco insecticide doesn't explain the cocaine and hashish traces, of course.
However, it's noteworthy that these drugs were perfectly legal and in reasonably common usage during the centuries in which Ramses II and his fellow mummies were being carted around, displayed, closely examined by countless people, and poorly stored.
And there was ample opportunity for contamination.
It's important to remember that these chemicals were found in trace amounts only, nothing at all like the nicotine, and in fewer of the mummies tested.
It is a pity indeed that when a good mystery presents itself, not everyone is interested in solving it, detective style.
Many pop culture sources, like the Discovery Channel, prefer instead to leave the mysterious finding unchallenged and unexamined.
The inevitable result is that the internet is now graffited with false history about the Egyptians being the first non-indigenous to voyage to the new world.
And perfectly smart, well-informed people are being given this misinformation with no reason to doubt it.
Support Our Listener-Driven Show 00:02:44
In a nutshell, the history of New World tobacco in old world mummies is the very heart of why skepticism and critical thinking are so important.
But never so important as our premium members, like the Blakies, Jason, Gabby, Sophia, and Talia, Zabbi, Verl Humphreys, and of course, who but IT Jesus.
That premium membership is what keeps us afloat.
If you love the show, then make this a two-way street.
For just $5 a month, tax-deductible for U.S. taxpayers, you can help ensure that this material is out there for those who need it for years to come.
Just come to skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
We're having a bit of a pandemic these days, so my travel schedule is blanked out.
That means I'm sitting home in the evenings with nothing better to do.
So why not let me Zoom or Skype into your virtual Skeptics in the Pub meeting?
Reach me at brian at skeptoid.com.
And if we do, be sure to wear your Skeptoid t-shirt from our online store.
We've got all the styles, sizes, and colors at skeptoid.com slash store.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection