All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
June 16, 2020 - Skeptoid
18:45
Skeptoid #732: Hunting the Beast of Gevaudan

This mysterious creature actually killed over 100 people in France in the 1760s. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Real Beast of Gévoudon 00:07:21
Many legendary monsters really aren't anything more than legends, but a few, in apparent defiance of rationality, are real.
The beast of Gévoudon was one.
It actually killed over 100 people in France in the 18th century.
Legions hunted it, but it was never definitively killed or even identified.
Centuries later, can we use whatever skills in documentary and historical research at our disposal to come up with a probable ID for this undoubtedly murderous creature?
The Beast of Gévoudon is coming up next, Unskeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's Hyperfixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hunting the Beast of Gévou Don From 1764 to 1767, a ferocious beast is said to have killed over 100 people in the south of France.
At first, the monster targeted solitary people out tending flocks in the forests, but later it grew bolder and would charge in to attack groups of people.
Sometimes villagers would fight it off, sometimes it would claim a victim and run off with an unfortunate person in its formidable jaws.
Hunters and soldiers were engaged to kill the beast, but the attacks continued.
Only when two large wolves were killed did the nightmare finally stop, and then the controversy began.
Was the beast one or more of these wolves?
Or had it been something far more sinister?
The Gé Vaudon is a historical region of rural France known for its harsh volcanic cliffs, steep slopes, and dense forests.
Though small villages and their fields dotted the valley floors, the Gé Vaudon was just the kind of place a predatory monster might hope to escape capture.
And it turns out that the whole region had built-in monsters to fit that very role, in the form of wolves.
It is no coincidence that European fairy tales often depict wolves in the role of the antagonist.
Until firearms became more common and more advanced, wolf attacks were well known, not just in this part of France, but throughout rural Europe.
Many died in wolf attacks in France every year.
Everyone who lived in the Gé Vaudon knew what they looked like.
And so it was extraordinary indeed when the attacks began in 1764, with all the eyewitness accounts declaring in unison that it was not a wolf, but some beast.
The attacks were indeed real, and modern analyses conclude the number was indeed as high as 100.
Every book or article about the beast gives an account of a few of the best-known specific attacks.
The first little girl to die, cases where villagers fought back and shot at it, and even wounded it, finding it impossible to bring down.
What sort of creature was it?
Well, that's where things get murky.
First of all, there's a little consistency to the reports.
The beast was said to be red and covered with scales, or it had long fur and a mane and black stripes.
It had a long, thin head like a greyhound, or it had an enormous head with a huge mouth.
It had great talons instead of a wolf's claws.
It could run at supernatural speed.
Sometimes it hunted alone, sometimes with a mate, sometimes with its young.
In contrast to the written descriptions, all the many contemporary illustrations of the beast generally look like dogs or wolves.
Among those villagers who tended toward belief in the supernatural, the beast was considered a lugaru, or werewolf.
In summary, the most common candidate identifications for the beast were a large wolf, a lion, a tiger, or a hyena.
All of these potential identifications were in fact plausible.
By the mid-1700s, menageries had animals of all descriptions from all over the world.
Ships came and went and brought curious creatures everywhere.
It was not at all uncommon for the wealthy to have their own exotic animals, any one of which could have escaped or been turned loose.
Animals like hyenas and lions were well known to everyone, with the important proviso that very few people had actually seen one, especially the untraveled peasants.
People knew what lions and hyenas looked like only by description and illustration, both of which were fanciful and unreliable, as often as not.
Ultimately, two animals were killed that finally brought an end to the attacks.
King Louis XV had sent a good-sized military contingent to the Gévoudon, plus organized hunting parties, but when they failed to produce results, he sent his personal lieutenant to the hunt to replace all of them.
Frosois Antoine arrived June 1765, and in late September, he finally got his quarry.
Using a monopod-mounted matchlock musket, he shot a wolf so big that he wrote, We never saw a big wolf that could be compared to this one.
Hence, we believe this could be the fearsome beast that caused so much damage.
Sources report that villagers recognized certain scars on the carcass from times it had been wounded by hunters, but no details survive.
Antoine sent the carcass back to Versailles as proof, where it was stuffed and displayed.
Antoine also shot a female he believed to be its mate, and also a young male pup, which he reported was larger than the mother.
Antoine did note that the pup had the congenital defect of double dew claws, the vestigial digits on a canine's forepaws that correspond to a human's thumbs.
He was handsomely rewarded, and the attacks stopped.
For two months, some dozen or so people were killed by the beast over a six-month period, until a local nobleman organized a mass hunt in June 1767, consisting of virtually every able-bodied person who could be armed.
Jean-Chastel was a hunter who believed the beast to be a Lugaru, and loaded his double-barreled flintlock rifle with buckshot in one barrel and a large caliber ball in the other.
Chastel's rifle became famous and still exists today in the private collection of a descendant of François Antoine.
With Chastel's kill, the attacks stopped for good.
The beast of Gévoudon was no more.
Chastel's kill led to the closest thing we have to empirical evidence of the creature's identity, and that's a written report of the necropsy done on this animal at the nobleman's castle, and known as the Merhau Report.
Spreading Good Ideas Through Media 00:02:32
It is a detailed objective description of the creature, plus a long list of precise measurements, and it even includes a list of the stomach contents.
The animal was no longer complete, as when the surgeon arrived he found, quote, a great crowd of people, already having examined it, quote, with knives which served them as scalpels, and he, quote, saw with the greatest regret that their zeal was superior to their knowledge, and that the most curious parts of the animal no longer existed.
End quote.
Regardless, the notarized necropsy report records all that we know today.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
There's a point we've mentioned many times on Skeptoid, and it's a hint that helps you determine which sources are valid and which are not.
Lazy authors often copy and paste from each other without going back to the original sources to actually check anything.
Hyena vs Wolf Mystery Solved 00:06:27
Virtually any book or article you'll find on The Beast of Gévaudon, written by a cryptozoologist, says that inside the stomach of the animal, the collarbone of a young girl was found.
Dismiss anything that says this because it's wrong, and it shows that the author did not check their source, and you also can't determine gender from a collarbone.
The two existing documents that discuss the necropsy on the animal, the Merhau report and another document known as the Letter from Auverny, both clearly state that the stomach contained the head of a femur from a child.
There is no mention of a collarbone.
The French word for femur is femur, kind of hard to get wrong.
Any author who says the animal described in the necropsy report was not a wolf and also mentions a collarbone should be dismissed.
Wolves do not typically eat bones, however, they'll often crush them for the marrow and ingest fragments.
As with Antoine's wolf, scars said to be consistent with two injuries inflicted upon the beast by locals during attacks were found on the animal.
These were a bayonet injury above its left eye and a bullet wound on its left thigh.
Besides this, all the measurements and descriptions of the animal are consistent with a large gray wolf, and not even an especially large one.
No irreconcilable traits were noted, with the exception of its teeth.
The report lists 22 teeth, and a wolf has 42.
Those that were specified match what a wolf has, but no mention is made of whether other teeth were missing.
The notary who prepared the report, Etienne Merha, wrote, This animal appears to be a wolf, but an extraordinary one.
By its figure and its proportions, it is very different from the wolves that one sees in this country.
This is what more than 300 people from all around have certified.
But this hyperbole contradicts the actual measurements, which were right in line with those of gray wolves there at the time.
We might conclude that the excitement of the moment led Merha and the 300 lookiloos to come away with an exaggerated idea of what they saw.
In fact, this remains the prevailing scientific view on what the beast of Gévoudon was, one or more large wolves, compounded with a hysterical, widely held belief that it was much larger and fiercer than any ordinary wolf.
But this is not the final word.
Chastel's wolf is not recorded to have had the same double dew claws that Antoine's had, but the fact that double dew claws were in the local population is noteworthy.
One popular sheepherding breed of dog used in the Gévoudon was the Beauceron, a breed in which the double dew claws are endemic.
The local gray wolves, Canis lupus, and the local Beaucerons, Canis lupus familiaris, are perfectly able to interbreed, and such hybrids are notoriously unpredictable in their behavior.
According to the International Wolf Center, wolves and various dog breeds mature at different rates.
This leads to unpredictable hormonal changes in a hybrid, which can produce behavioral changes that may include overt aggression.
A wolf-Beauceron hybrid could well go through a uniquely aggressive phase as it matures, and once it learns humans are a viable food source, the hunting of humans can become part of their learned behavior.
Now there's no evidence that this is what happened, but hormonally induced aggression among hybrids is well known, and the hybridization of wolves and Beaucerans does appear likely to have taken place.
This appears more probable than one competing explanation for the beast's aggression, which is rabies.
Rabid wolves are absolutely more aggressive and are more likely to attack humans.
However, rabies is almost always fatal in humans and is easily transmitted by a bite.
There were many survivors of the Gé Voudon attacks, but all such survivors would have died of rabies if the attacking animal had been infected, and none did.
So the rabies explanation is a poor fit.
There's one more popular explanation that ought to be put to rest.
Many modern sources report that in 1997, a taxidermist at the National Museum of Natural History in Paris found a record indicating that the museum had had a stuffed hyena in its collection from 1766 to 1819.
It has also been reported that the son of Jean-Chastel had such a hyena in his private menagerie.
We might speculate that perhaps young Chastel's hyena escaped, was responsible for some or all of the beast's attacks, then was shot by Antoine, sent to Versailles, and ended up stuffed in the Paris Museum.
There are two serious problems with this hypothesis.
According to the museum, the stuffed hyena was positively identified as a striped hyena, and the largest of these are smaller than an adult wolf.
Their features, especially the stripes, are quite distinctive, and would not have escaped mention in the written records that described Antoine's kill as a large wolf, and would not have escaped depiction in a famous illustration of Antoine's stuffed kill in the court of Louis XV, where it appears as a very conventional large black wolf.
It seems improbable that the king's lieutenant of the hunt shot a hyena, then a wolf, believing them to be mates, and yet was unable to distinguish between the two species.
The second reason to doubt it is that the beast's attacks continued well into 1767, the year after the museum taxidermist said it entered the collection.
There's no reason at all to connect the two taxidermy pieces, especially given that all the indications are that they were two very different species of animal.
And so, with that, we put to rest the beast of Je Voudon and pause to remember the 100 people it killed.
Whether a wolf, a wolf hybrid, or something else unsuspected, it did indeed carve itself a gory niche in the history of legendary monsters.
Skepticism Is Best Medicine 00:02:19
Others with a niche in history are our premium supporters like David Rickard, Not So Wise, Kendrick John, and Tanya Marwood.
Are you getting the Skeptoid podcast companion email?
It comes out each week along with each new episode, featuring the wonder of the week and much more.
If you don't, you're only getting half the show, so come to skeptoid.com and click on Newsletter.
Remember, every Skeptoid episode has a transcript page at skeptoid.com with complete bibliographic references and further reading suggestions.
And they also print out into nicely formatted PDF documents that you can share.
Your premium membership is what keeps us afloat.
If you love the show, then make this a two-way street.
For just $5 a month, tax-deductible for U.S. taxpayers, you can help ensure that this material is out there for those who need it for years to come.
Just come to skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection