All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
March 3, 2020 - Skeptoid
18:43
Skeptoid #717: Rethinking Plastic Straw Bans

Bans on plastic drinking straws are a solution in search of a problem. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Why Plastic Straw Bans Fail 00:15:03
Bans on plastic straws have become so universal that in many places it's now the exception instead of the rule when you're able to get one at all, even upon request.
And we all think it's helping to protect marine life, to keep plastic out of the oceans, and to fight global warming, or something.
But surprise, the science shows that bans on plastic straws might not be doing any of those things, and in fact, might even be counterproductive.
Rethinking plastic straw bands is today on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of HyperFixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
Rethinking plastic straw bands.
In a world where we're fast closing in on the tipping points of climate change, where all signs point to us barreling toward irreversible environmental damage, we see huge numbers of various initiatives and plans being tossed around and often implemented.
While the deep systemic changes needed to make a real difference are moving at a glacial pace at best, lots of smaller local environmental initiatives are passing, and a lot of these happen to be bans on plastic straws.
Plastic drinking straws, say many people, are the low-hanging fruit of environmental catastrophe, a place where a small change can make a big difference.
Today we're going to take a look at the science behind these bans to determine whether they truly are the best place to focus our efforts, or merely just the easiest.
I would like to point out that I agree 100% with the motivations of every listener out there who does choose alternatives to plastic straws and with those who support plastic straw bans.
I believe your intentions are exactly right on track and I love every one of you.
The purpose of this episode is not to criticize your actions, but rather to point out hidden weaknesses in this particular type of activism and to suggest improvements and alternatives that will better accomplish our shared goals.
Let's get started by characterizing the scope of the problem that plastic straws create.
The bands almost always cite ocean plastics as the trouble area, so we'll focus on that.
Skeptoid number 665, Ocean Plastics, Facts and Falsehoods, covered many details in depth that we need for this topic.
So go back and listen to that one now if you haven't yet.
We know that about 8 million metric tons of plastic makes it into the oceans every year, nearly all of it from China, Indonesia, the Philippines, and a handful of other developing nations that do not properly manage their waste.
Figuring out how much of that consists of straws is harder, but the most popularly cited study gives the figure as 0.025%, or about 2,000 metric tons.
The United States is responsible for somewhat less than 1% of the plastic in the oceans, so probably less than 20 tons of straws.
20 tons is still a lot of straws.
In fact, at about 0.42 grams a piece, it's around 45 million straws per year.
That's about one in 3,750 of the 120 billion straws that Americans use each year.
So that's our final answer.
About one in 3,750 straws ends up where we don't want it to.
And that number is probably in the same ballpark for other nations who follow similar waste management practices to the United States.
Here, where we simply don't mismanage our waste through large-scale dumping of trash into rivers so it can flow into the ocean, plastic straw bands are a solution in search of a problem.
Note to be careful when researching this, or anything else.
The most widely given number of straws used by Americans is 500 million per day.
It's a bogus number, despite being copy and pasted into virtually every news article on these bands.
Industry research groups say 329 million per day, thus the 120 billion per year number given here.
If you're curious why an item that makes up such an infinitesimal proportion of plastic trash became the target of such aggressive bans, and why those bans always cite ocean plastics, even in landlocked states, you're in luck.
It turns out that we are able to track this one down to exactly the event that triggered it.
And like so many movements in popular culture, the genesis of plastic straw bands had very little to do with science and much to do with emotion.
In 2015, a marine biology research team was in a boat off Costa Rica studying sea turtle mating.
They noticed that one had some kind of debris stuck in its nostril.
The YouTube video of what happened next went viral.
As of this writing, it has nearly 40 million views.
The turtle had ingested a 10 centimeter or 4 inch plastic straw or stirring stick, and in spitting it back out had somehow managed to send it out the wrong passageway and it got stuck in its nose.
For eight minutes, the team wrestled with it using the pliers on a multi-tool, with the turtle cringing, squirming, sneezing, and bleeding the whole time.
It's hard to watch.
Fortunately, it has a happy ending.
The straw finally pops out, the bleeding stops, and the team disinfected it and observed the turtle for a while before releasing it, whereupon it swam happily away.
The emotional impact of this video is what put plastic straws on the public's radar.
Within days of the video being posted on YouTube, August 10th, 2015, news sites everywhere were showing it.
From The Telegraph on August 14th.
Plastic straw removed from turtle's nose by marine biologists in heartbreaking video.
From National Geographic on August 17th.
How did Sea Turtle get a straw up its nose?
And from The Washington Post on the same day.
Sea Turtle Trauma.
Video shows rescuers extracting plastic straw from deep in nostril.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
How did this impact bans on plastic straws?
You can use tools such as the Google News search and Google Trends to find out.
Set a custom date range, then sort the results by date.
The answer is that it took just over a year after the Turtle video that the first bans on plastic straws began to appear in newspapers.
Prior to the Turtle video, the news was virtually devoid of any thoughts of banning plastic straws.
So the data does appear to support that we have one unlucky turtle to thank.
Straws made from alternative materials is an explosively growing industry.
Most are glued paper and come from China, but domestic producers create them as well from paper, cellulose, hay, even crushed avocado seeds, and doubtless other materials.
So far, very few of them get good results.
They're rough on the lips and they quickly get soggy and dissolve.
Personally, I don't see this as a showstopper.
The alternatives are terrible for now.
But as in all development processes, we have to go through the steps of doing things badly before we learn to do them well.
Future alternative straw materials will probably match the comfort and performance of plastic straws.
They're certainly not close to it yet.
However, there are non-disposable metal straws, for the truly hardcore straw lover, that have good performance.
But carrying around your own straw every day is a prospect that appeals to very few people.
Beyond the very significant fact that we don't yet have a viable alternative, there are two fundamental problems with banning plastic straws.
The first problem is the simple one, the belief that plastic straws are a significant part of some apocalyptic problem.
They're not.
How big of a problem plastic in the environment truly is generally greatly exaggerated.
And again, I refer you back to episode 665 for all the data backing this.
As the role in that problem played by Americans and most other Western nations is tiny, there's nothing that changes in Western consumer behavior can do to impact it.
Even if there was, straws are simply statistically insignificant as a contributor.
Thus, plastic straw bands in Western nations have no appreciable capacity to accomplish anything useful, except making their practitioners feel good about themselves.
The second fundamental problem with plastic straw bands is borne out by economic theory.
This is the same point that was central to episode number 695, Fighting Global Warming with Economics.
This is that people act in their self-interest, and that any solution to any problem that depends on people acting against their self-interest and in the public interest instead is doomed to fail, as centuries of human history have proven.
Plastic straws are cheap, ubiquitous, convenient, and they perform extremely well.
The alternatives fail on all those points.
Given a choice, people will always choose the plastic straws.
A small number of people will be loud and proud about their embrace of alternatives, but economic theory and history combine to show us that they will always be in the minority.
This dooms plastic straw bands to the tragedy of the commons, in which every act of altruism by one person incentivizes someone else to take the opposite action.
Your purchase of a Prius affects supply and demand so that the next person gets a better deal when he chooses a gigantic pickup.
Thus, a plastic straw ban can only work if it is imposed by law upon a majority who don't want it.
And it would be a tenuous law as it would produce none of the intended economic benefits.
Now, lest you charge that I'm a shill for big plastic straws, a charge that some listeners will insist upon no matter how this episode concludes, keep in mind that this show regularly talks about global warming as the greatest threat to our environment and to our economy.
We must get off of fossil fuels as aggressively as possible.
We must ultimately stop all extraction of oil.
Therefore, we must find alternatives to petrochemical-based plastics and continue to grow the efficiency at which we recycle our existing plastic.
These are all difficult problems to solve.
Another common theme found in these skeptoid episodes is that solving difficult problems requires precise understanding of the nature of those problems.
When we mischaracterize a problem, we hamper our ability to devise effective solutions.
Bans on plastic straws and plastic bags are emotionally satisfying for some people, but the data is unequivocal that they are not useful components of any meaningful solution.
Rather, they divert attention away from the things people should be focusing on and give a false sense of relief to people who now feel they've accomplished something and their duty is done.
Again, think back to episode number 419 on slacktivism.
Research has clearly shown that ineffective activism actually does more harm than good because those who engage in it are then less likely than other people to engage in useful activism.
So let's conclude with what that useful activism should look like.
As we discussed in detail in episode 665, NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, says there are two threats to the ocean which are both far greater and more immediate than plastics.
Overfishing and global warming with its attendant acidification, both of which threaten countless entire species.
Beach Cleanups Over Bans 00:03:19
If you care about the ocean, these are both things you can absolutely help with, and that plastic straw bans don't.
The one type of plastic remediation that NOAA does recommend is participating in local beach cleanups.
See all that litter on the beach?
It didn't come from inland restaurants.
It came from people littering on the beach.
It's mostly food containers, followed by plastic bottles and caps, paper products, plates and cups, and finally a few straws too.
Even if you replace those plastic straws on the beach with glued paper straws, you'll still have just as much litter.
So if you want to help and you're going to be visiting a beach town, sign up for a community beach cleanup project.
Help the oceans by fighting global warming at the ballot box.
And help keep our coastlines clean with a fun weekend volunteer project.
These are projects where activism truly counts.
Some more activists who really count are our premium supporters, such as A. Funk from Halifax, Nova Scotia, Speakeasy Arcade, Mike Marsh, and Simon McMahon.
Thanks so much.
And for everyone else, are you getting the weekly podcast companion email?
If you aren't, you're only getting half the show.
There is so much more in this email that comes with each episode.
If you aren't getting it, come to skeptoid.com and click on newsletter.
And also, a reminder that something Skeptoid always needs is five-star reviews from people who like us a five-star amount.
Science podcasts like this that cast doubt on pop woo always attract a ton of fake one-star reviews from pseudoscience enthusiasts.
So we always need you to fight back for us.
Search for Skeptoid on iTunes or the podcast portal of your choice and strike back at the woo-ists.
Having good reviews is important for keeping Skeptoid in the top 10 of social sciences in iTunes, where it's been for 12 years.
Thanks for your help and for your support.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Skepticism Is The Best Medicine 00:00:17
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection