All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Sept. 24, 2019 - Skeptoid
18:46
Skeptoid #694: Playing Error Guitar

Skeptoid corrects another round of errors in previous episodes caught by you amazing listeners. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Correcting Our Mistakes 00:01:58
What good would a podcast about the truth behind urban legends be if it wasn't wrong itself sometimes?
Well, I admit it, here and there, I do tend to flub a few facts.
And so, every so often, we drop a correction bomb on you, like this one, to set the record straight and fix any errors that we, or you, the good listeners, have been able to find.
And we're doing it right now on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's Hyperfixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Playing error guitar.
Once again, we turn to the mailbag and find out where clever listeners have found errors in certain Skeptoid episodes.
One great thing about having an audience that consists largely of academics is that errors don't have very good life expectancy.
They get picked out pretty quick.
So today I'm going to present the latest round of errors found by you good listeners and correct them on episodes about the red rains of India, who decides the names of chemicals, the virgin of Guadalupe, griffins, nostradamus, global warming, and mercury in fish and the minimata incident.
We'll get started first with a statement falsely attributed to Charles Darwin.
Red Rain Updates 00:08:48
Episode number 224 was about red rainfalls in India, often reported in the popular press as blood raining down from the sky, possibly as some kind of omen or curse.
In more recent years, a pair of scientists whose expertise was in unrelated fields successfully persuaded the world press that the rain was dyed red by the presence of alien spores, an explanation which is still the first one trotted out whenever these red rainfalls happen again.
And they do continue happening, though it's still very rare.
In the episode, I mentioned researchers noted similar red rainfalls in 1818, 1846, 1872, 1880, 1896, and 1950, including one described by Charles Darwin.
Had alien rain been falling since Darwin's day?
Well, not so fast.
Listener David from Australia noted that the attribution to Darwin is found pretty much everywhere a red rain report appears in the scholarly literature.
This quote is now used to reference the same claim on the Wikipedia entry for red rain in Kerala.
Your reference to Darwin noting red rain may have come from Bizarre Weather by Joanne O'Sullivan, where she writes, Charles Darwin wrote about a red rain that he experienced while at sea off the Cape Verde Islands.
If you read Darwin's account from both The Voyage of the Beagle and his paper, An Account of the Fine Dust Which Often Falls on Vessels in the Atlantic Ocean, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, Volume 2, January 1846, Darwin never mentions red rain, but refers only to the fine airborne dust particles noted by both himself and other mariners off the coast of Africa.
And as David's was an awesomely comprehensively cited correction, it turns out that he is absolutely correct.
Darwin said nothing about red rain, though that was obviously the presentation of what he did report on.
Darwin's actual quote, published in 1897, merely said, The dust falls in such quantities as to dirty everything on board and to hurt people's eyes.
Vessels have even run ashore owing to the obscurity of the atmosphere.
It has often fallen on ships when more than a thousand miles from the coast of Africa and at points 1,600 miles distant in a north and south direction.
In some dust which was collected on a vessel 300 miles from land, I found particles of stone above the thousandth of an inch square mixed with finer matter.
Note the lack of alien spores reported by Darwin.
This was atmospheric dust kicked up from deserts on the Arabian Peninsula.
This still explains much muddy red rain in the area, though this is unrelated to what the actual cause of the red rain discussed in the episode was.
And if you want to learn what that was, which is pretty wild and crazy, you want to go back and re-listen to episode 224.
Episode 479 was about chemicals, specifically how the very word itself has come to be almost a swear word.
It's often used to trigger chemophobia in people and scare them away from whatever technology, food, or other product is deemed to be terrible.
In the episode, we stated that chemical names are determined according to a set of rules defined by the IUPAP, the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics.
Listener David wrote in from Scotland, A minor correction.
It is actually overseen by IUPAC, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.
And he is absolutely right.
This was all Kevin Hoover's fault, who guest-hosted this episode for me a few years ago.
Damn it, Kevin, you ruined the podcast.
Now let's go all the way back to 2010, to episode number 201, on the Virgin of Guadalupe, which is the name for an image of the Virgin Mary said to have been miraculously imprinted on a cactus fiber tunic called a tilma.
This was at the time when Spanish conquistadors occupied what is today Mexico, and the Catholic Church governed the lives of the Aztecs.
Those of the Dominican order favored using the tilma as a recruiting tool to baptize Aztecs, while those of the Franciscan order, knowing it had been painted by an artist and had not been miraculously imprinted, felt this was wrong and did not want it used in such a way.
The Dominicans won, as you can probably guess, a decision which resulted in the apparently holy image helping to baptize some 8 million Aztecs.
Listener Robert from Nashville wrote, I would like to point out what I believe to be a very minor mistake in episode 201.
In it, you refer to Fray Pedro De Gante as a Franciscan monk.
As a Franciscan missionary, De Gante would have been a friar, which in Catholicism is entirely distinct from a monk.
However, to your credit, the two are often incorrectly used interchangeably.
Keep up the good work.
Robert is correct.
Throughout the episode, it appears that I used these terms, and also the term priest, interchangeably.
However, all three are separate things, though friars and monks are often also priests.
So I've cleaned the episode up a bit.
An authority on Catholicism, I am not, regrettably.
A couple minor but important corrections to episode 442 on Griffins.
We mentioned the Soviet archaeologist Sergei Rudenko, but unfortunately misspelled his name in the transcript, since corrected, and also erroneously said that he was Russian, an error repeated on his Wikipedia page.
He was in fact of mixed Ukrainian and Russian heritage.
Since he was born in 1940 when both were united as parts of the Soviet Union, we've decided to avoid trying to nail him down more specifically and described him as Soviet.
Apologies to any from the region who may have taken offense, and thanks to listener Vladimir for the correction.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Now we'll shift to that perennial favorite, Nostradamus.
Woo about history's most famous alleged seer will permeate pop culture forever, it seems.
In episode number 66, we gave a list of things Nostradamus was known for, followed by a paragraph striking each of these claims down one by one.
One of these was that his prophecies were placed on the Vatican's list of banned books in the year 1781, which I rebutted with the popularly repeated assertion that the Vatican had no such list in 1781.
Listener Adelaide wrote in, You mentioned in your Nostradamus episode that he was not placed on the Vatican's index of forbidden books in 1781 because the Vatican had no such list in 1781, and he was never placed on any such list in any year.
Mercury Poisoning Facts 00:04:51
I have no reason to doubt the second part, but there absolutely was an index of forbidden books from the time of the Council of Trent well into the 20th century.
True, there were indeed many editions of this list, beginning in about 1559, when the most official such list was published by Pope Paul IV, eventually becoming the Index Librorum Prohibitorum.
However, its contents are widely available online, and nothing by Michel de Nostradame nor any other variation of his name ever appeared on any of them.
The guy wrote cookbooks in real life.
I mean, come on.
Next is probably the most important screw-up that I made in this batch of episodes, and it came in episode number 671 about the relationship between ocean plastics and China's ban on importing recycled raw materials.
At one point, the discussion turned to landfill emissions, and I said in the show, Methane is the single most important greenhouse gas to control right now, as carbon dioxide has already saturated its part in the electromagnetic spectrum in the atmosphere.
No!
Wrong!
It is indeed very important to control methane, but the reason has nothing to do with carbon dioxide having already reached some saturation point.
In fact, this is a common talking point of global warming deniers.
They say we've already added enough carbon dioxide to the atmosphere to fully realize the amount of heat that it insulates in, so there's no harm in adding more and more by burning more fossil fuels.
This is completely false, and it completely misstates the way the greenhouse effect works.
It is not, quote, more important to control methane than carbon dioxide.
We need to control them both.
Methane is about 30 times as potent at trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, and as the Earth warms, more and more methane gets released from decaying organic matter.
But it's present at far lower concentrations than carbon dioxide, which is really the big one defining the overall shape of the Earth's radiative spectrum.
Thanks to listener Tim for being the first to point out my error and sending me into a mad scramble not only to fix it, but to figure out how I got it so wrong.
I should have known better.
In a recent student questions episode, a student asked about mercury levels in fish, and need we worry about getting mercury poisoning.
In the episode, I said, To date, there has never been a known or published case of mercury poisoning in a human from eating fish.
And what I meant was commercially caught and sold fish.
Many, many, many, many people wrote in quickly to say that I forgot about the Minimata incident.
This was a case in Japan that lasted several decades, which involved principally shellfish living in the mud right at the outlet from a chemical factory that dumped methylmercury-laden wastewater from 1932 to 1968.
Local people harvested these shellfish for their own consumption, and many developed severe mercury poisoning.
But it took decades for the connection to be established.
Another smaller but similar case was discovered in Niigata Prefecture as a result.
The mercury accumulated in the mud with much greater density than it ever could have in the open water, which is why shellfish were a much more deadly vector than fish would have been.
However, also as a result of the Minimata incident, three cases were discovered in Ontario involving fish in rivers on First Nation communities similarly affected by severe localized industrial mercury dumping.
In all of these cases, the contamination was so severe that it was possible to process the mud in Japan and the river water in Ontario to recover useful amounts of industrial mercury.
These cases cannot be compared to the original question about fish caught in the wild or in the ocean, though, as these locations were geographically constricted and did not have any natural dilution.
So although it would not be possible for these conditions to exist in areas of commercial fisheries, it was still wrong for me to say there's never been a case of mercury poisoning in a human from eating fish.
However, it is still true that nobody has ever caught mercury poisoning from commercially available fish.
And so far as I could find, no commercial fish catches have ever been found to contain levels of mercury that approached maximum safe levels.
So the conclusion still remains, you may continue eating both commercially bought fish and shellfish without concern for mercury toxicity.
Skepticism Is Best Medicine 00:03:04
So keep those corrections coming in.
Also, since the last error corrections episode, I've put up a new page at skeptoid.com slash corrections, where errors can be reported.
Much of this page consists of instructions because the vast majority of correction emails I receive are from people who have a hunch but no data or from wooists who believe aliens and poltergeists are actively impacting their life, so I should retract about half the episodes.
If you have valid corrections, the information on skeptoid.com slash corrections should give you everything you need to properly report it in a way that passes editorial muster here in the Skeptoid offices.
So I look forward to seeing it and look forward to keeping the bar for good information as high as we can.
And speaking of keeping things high, here's a big high five to Skeptoid premium supporters, Tom Larson, Daniel Gelot, I'm sure I butchered that pronunciation, sorry, Daniel, Pete Catoulis, and John Belcher.
That's one I know I can pronounce.
Skeptoid depends on monthly micropayments from its premium members to stay in business.
But for those of you who want to listen free, there are still ways you can help.
Think two and two.
Share an episode with two friends and spend two minutes writing a five-star review on iTunes or the podcast portal of your choice, assuming you think it's worth it.
Reviews really do count in these days of having to compete with investor-financed networks.
So please support the small independent shows like Skeptoid.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection