All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
April 23, 2019 - Skeptoid
17:58
Skeptoid #672: Refeeding Syndrome and Sudden Death

Can starving people actually die immediately upon being given their first bite of food? Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Real Refeeding Syndrome 00:09:31
Everyone's heard the heartbreaking stories of Allied troops liberating the concentration camps at the end of World War II and giving all their rations to the starving victims, only to see those victims die almost immediately from the unfamiliar rush of food.
It's called refeeding syndrome, and it is a real medical phenomenon.
Today we're going to find out just how realistic these particular stories are.
Can you really die so quickly from just a few bites of food?
And we're going to find out right now on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Refeeding Syndrome and Sudden Death.
We've all seen it in the newsreels, Europe 1945, Allied forces liberating the prisoners in the Nazi concentration camps.
Shocked at the skeletal condition of some of the prisoners who've been subsisting on starvation diets for months or even years, the soldiers hand over every scrap of food they can lay their hands on.
But then, many of these reports say, the sucker has an unexpected and horrifying effect.
Some of the prisoners fall instantly dead at the first bite.
Within minutes, many others have followed.
Today we're going to look at the facts behind stories of starved people suddenly dying upon receiving their first bites of food.
The most infamous of these stories comes from the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in northern Germany, best known as the camp where Anne Frank died after her family's arrest.
Belsen did not have gas chambers and did not conduct mass executions as were done at Auschwitz and others.
But by the end of the war, it was suffering from a terrible epidemic of typhus and was as deadly as any camp.
In December 1944, five months before the camp was liberated, Germany began mass transportation of prisoners from other camps into Belsen.
This made the overcrowded, diseased, and starvation conditions far worse.
From that point, the death rate of prisoners approximately tripled every month, reaching over 18,000 dying in March 1945 alone.
When the Allied troops arrived, they found 60,000 survivors, most of whom were near death from either typhus, starvation, or both.
From an article about Belsen in a BBC series on the liberation of the camps.
Some inmates had been starved for so long that they had lost the ability to digest the rations that well-meaning British soldiers offered them.
Within minutes of taking a biscuit, some inmates just passed away.
One British doctor told the Imperial War Museums how they attempted to help.
The food that we got breaking open these compo rations was just not right for these people.
Their stomachs just couldn't take anything.
The best we could do was to make it a thin stew.
Some people who tried to eat the real stuff straight away, I'm afraid it was too much and it probably killed them.
But it was kindness to give them something, although it is the wrong kind of kindness.
The emergency response effort was massive, but receiving 60,000 critical patients all at once is a pretty tall order.
14,000 of the newly liberated prisoners died after their liberation.
The rate was even worse at other camps.
From the Holocaust Encyclopedia.
Allied troops, physicians, and relief workers tried to provide nourishment for the surviving prisoners, but many of them were too weak to digest food and could not be saved.
In spite of the liberators' efforts, many camp survivors died.
Half of the prisoners discovered alive in Auschwitz died within a few days of being freed.
Although there are anecdotal accounts of prisoners dying within seconds of their first food, reports of such super-fast deaths are absent from most of the literature.
Reports of slower deaths occurring within a few days following the resumption of food intake are, however, commonly found in reliable histories.
Are these stories medically plausible?
The answer is largely a resounding yes, with an exception for claims of sudden deaths.
What happens in cases like these is a potentially fatal medical condition called refeeding syndrome, where changes in body chemistry can trigger any of several causes of death.
For centuries, there's been a vague general knowledge that bad things can happen when we suddenly start feeding starving people.
But it wasn't until World War II and all of its many cases of starvation around the world that science began to take a serious look at what was happening.
In the references on the online transcript of this episode at skeptoid.com are links to a number of articles that explain the biochemistry behind refeeding syndrome in full detail.
But I'll just give the abbreviated version here.
Your body makes a number of changes to its chemistry in response to starvation, changes which are intended to preserve its most important tissues for as long as possible.
Electrolyte imbalances often result.
Then when you start eating again, a whole wave of fluid and electrolyte shifts takes place.
Insulin production increases, among other changes.
The main feature of refeeding syndrome is hypophosphatemia, a dangerous shortage of phosphates in the serum, as well as shortages of other minerals.
Phosphorus in particular is essential for all cellular processes, and hypophosphatemia can result in respiratory failure, cardiac failure, arrhythmia, seizures, coma, and death.
Although the liberating soldiers at Belson quickly learned that refeeding was doing its share of harm, the mechanisms weren't known.
But they couldn't just not feed the people.
And from what's recorded historically and what's known today, it does indeed appear that fatal refeeding syndrome was responsible for at least some substantial portion of those 14,000 post-liberation deaths.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
We do see refeeding syndrome today.
There's no ethical way to deliberately put test subjects into such a dangerous physical state, but people already in that condition do come into hospitals, so we do have study data on the syndrome.
Mostly, these are anorexia nervosa patients, but there are a variety of other types of patients with severe malnutrition.
Studying Hypophosphatemia Onset 00:06:11
Among other lessons, these cases have given us an opportunity to study the actual time of onset of hypophosphatemia.
The mean time is 1.9 days after refeeding begins.
This is generally in line with the best reports from Belsen and other camps, which stated that many prisoners died after just a few days.
It does not support the anecdotes claiming that people died instantly or within minutes of downing a tin of bully beef gifted by a concerned soldier.
More importantly, these modern cases have taught us how to refeed safely and avoid the syndrome altogether.
According to data published in the British Medical Journal, which studied over 10,000 such cases, 100% of patients went into hypophosphatemia when fed intravenously with a solution that did not include phosphorus supplementation.
But when it did, the incidence was reduced to just 18%.
So clearly, phosphate supplementation is key in refeeding.
The currently recommended guidelines for refeeding malnourished patients is to start with multivitamin supplements, then proceed with feeding at 10 calories per kilogram of body weight per day, and slowly increase it over four to seven days.
If the patient is severely malnourished or has not eaten at all for two weeks, then refeed beginning at five calories per kilogram per day.
An adult man at Belson would have weighed about 45 kilograms or 100 pounds, so they should have been given about 225 calories a day to start with.
Constant rehydration with supplementation of potassium, phosphate, calcium, and magnesium, as well as frequent monitoring of serum levels of these minerals, is essential.
Sadly, in 1945, we didn't yet have this knowledge, but we were trying to figure it out.
Towards the end of World War II, knowledge of the Nazi concentration camps had begun to spread, and there had already been cases of prisoner of war camps around the world where prisoners had suffered severe starvation.
So in 1944, the United States launched a study to learn more about the effects of starvation and how best to recover from it.
It's now known as the Minnesota Starvation Experiment.
Its principal investigator was Ansel Keyes, the eminent physiologist who pioneered so much dietary research throughout the 20th century.
He's perhaps best known for his Seven Countries study, which ran for 50 years and established the connections between dietary cholesterol and heart disease.
The Minnesota experiment drew its volunteers from the ranks of conscientious objectors, men who had been drafted for World War II but refused to fight, and so had been assigned to the civilian public service where they could escape prosecution by performing domestic work considered to be of national importance.
From hundreds of volunteers, Keyes selected 36 subjects.
For six months, their diets were cut to 1,560 calories per day, mainly of potatoes, rutabagas, turnips, bread, and macaroni, to simulate what Europeans had to eat in the later stages of the war.
And by the end of those six months, they were looking pretty skeletal.
Finally, they were refed in various different controlled groups over three months.
While Keyes' experiment had potential to help the concentration camp prisoners, it didn't help much.
First of all, its results came too late.
Second, it was designed more to simulate the experience of ordinary European citizens whose deprivation was caused by wartime shortages, not of concentration camp prisoners whose deprivation was far more severe.
When Keyes' subjects began their refeeding at the end of the six months, they had still been on a diet that, while restrictive, was still somewhat nutritious.
So they weren't sufficiently malnourished for refeeding to trigger hypophosphatemia, like so many of the Belsen prisoners.
Another point that seems clear is that death from refeeding syndrome doesn't seem to have anything to do with an inability to digest the food.
That appears to have just been the best guess made at the time by the eyewitnesses, and it made it into most of the written histories and is still the most common explanation repeated today.
There's one other question that I found frequently asked on this subject, and it's whether some of those anecdotal instant deaths, like the one in the BBC article, might have been from one of the comorbid conditions.
Most camps had disease outbreaks.
Bergen-Belsen alone was raging with typhus, typhoid fever, dysentery, and tuberculosis.
One of the most detailed histories of the liberation of Belsen is the massive German-language nine-volume set, Place of Terror, The History of Nazi Concentration Camps.
According to the authors of Volume 7, which includes Belsen, the sheer scope of the incident for the Allied medical services was so overwhelming that it became impractical to keep good records of the causes of so many deaths.
Camps liberated by the Soviets had no records at all.
So we can't offer a good answer to the question of whether the fast deaths were the result of refeeding syndrome or of one of the other diseases.
But it is noteworthy that none of those other diseases are consistent with a sudden death from eating a biscuit.
One final thought.
As an example for the subject of refeeding syndrome, this episode brought up the Holocaust.
Obviously, that's a topic of infinitely greater importance, which touches many more aspects of society and culture than just this one bit.
In remembrance of the countless people whose actual lives lost we used today, I suggest making it a priority to visit any Holocaust museum or memorial at your next opportunity, especially those of you who have never been to one before.
Welcome Back Mike Parker 00:02:11
If everyone would make such a visit, the world would be a better place.
It happened, and it can happen again.
As always, a big Skeptoid shout-out to Premium supporters, Dave in Flitthard, which I believe is in Germany, thematically enough.
Stephen Zuber, a supporter since 2009.
Thank you very much, Stephen, for a decade of support.
Then a suspicious character called Mr. Anderson, and I was requested to say it like that.
And Mike Parker, for whom I don't have to get out an Atlas or do any weird voices.
Mike Parker, great to have you on board.
To get your shout out on the show, come to skeptoid.com and log into the members portal.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection