All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Oct. 23, 2018 - Skeptoid
17:41
Skeptoid #646: Animal Earthquake Prediction

Many people believe animals have the ability to predict earthquakes. The facts tell a different story. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Animals Sensing Earthquake P Waves 00:06:24
Since we were all children, we've all harbored a sort of folk belief that animals, such as dogs and cats, can sense an earthquake before it comes.
Not just a few seconds, but hours or days or weeks.
It's a belief so common that few of us even think to question it.
But science has come to our rescue.
Published studies have now put this belief to the test.
And today we're going to find out if we were all right or wrong.
The truth behind animal earthquake prediction is coming up today on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Animal Earthquake Prediction It's true if you've ever been to the movies or gotten your education from the University of YouTube, animals can predict earthquakes, and they can do it hours, days, or weeks in advance.
However, if you get your information from more conventional sources, you probably know that this claim is by no means widely held among seismologists.
The question of whether animals can sense impending quakes seems particularly thorny, but it turns out it really isn't after all.
But before we get too far into the subject, let's be clear on what we are not talking about, and that's the genuine ability of many animals to sense some earthquakes a few seconds before most people can.
As human beings, our survival and success depends much more upon abstract thought than upon physical senses.
Animals, on the other hand, have to deal with things like avoiding predators or finding prey, so their evolutionary pressures have selected for heightened sensory perception.
Most animals are thus much more likely to feel earthquakes too slight for us to notice, and or to hear the slight noises from things shifting.
Now there are two basic types of seismic waves, body waves that travel through the earth and surface waves propagating along its surface.
Body waves are the ones that reach us first and are the ones relevant to our discussion of animal sensing.
Now there are also two types of body waves and you're probably already familiar with them.
The first is called the primary wave or P wave.
This wave is compressional, causing vibrations parallel to the direction of its movement.
P waves travel the fastest between 4 and 7 kilometers per second, about 9 to 16,000 miles per hour.
The other type is the secondary wave or S wave, which causes shearing vibrations perpendicular to the direction of its movement.
S waves are much slower, traveling only 2 to 5 kilometers per second.
That's 4,500 to 11,000 miles per hour.
The faster P waves are also the only ones that propagate through water.
In most cases, P waves are quite a lot weaker than S waves, so although they arrive 2 kilometers a second sooner, humans are less likely to notice them than are animals.
Thus, with their heightened sensitivity, it's expected that dogs and cats and other animals will prick up their ears or jump to their feet or otherwise express surprise a few seconds before humans notice an earthquake.
This is thoroughly documented and well supported by basic science and is not in any dispute.
It's also quite distinct from the claims made by those who believe animals have some additional sense that allows them to predict earthquakes well in advance, which is what we're going to study today.
Just want to make sure we're not confusing animals' actual ability to detect tiny perturbations better and sooner than humans with the claims that they have a significant predictive ability, the non-ambiguous detection of an earthquake hours, days, or weeks in advance.
For a long time, one of the better-known methods for predicting earthquakes came from Northern California.
It had been a popular belief, trusted and promoted by the local press, that when there was a significant rise in the number of lost pet reports in the San Jose Mercury News, there was an 80% chance of an earthquake with a magnitude between 3.5 and 5.5 within 110 kilometers of San Jose within some certain amount of time.
Widespread repetition of this belief led to a general acceptance among many people.
Finally, in 1988, one seismologist had had enough and published a detailed statistical analysis of the claims, found that there was not the slightest bit of truth to it.
But all this really says is that if animals can sense quakes, escaping from their owners in San Jose isn't the way they show it.
An interesting proposal is the idea that animals would have evolved behavior to protect them from earthquakes.
We know that many animals are able to sense P waves a few seconds before the destructive part of the earthquake hits.
What would be required for an evolutionary behavior to form would be the deaths of some animals who fail to react during those few seconds.
Now, there's not really all that many ways for an earthquake to kill an animal.
Burrow collapse is one, and tsunami action is another.
If, over countless millennia, enough animals left burrows and ran for higher ground whenever faint vibrations were detected, it is conceivable that such a behavior could form.
However, when we read the anecdotes of altered animal behavior prior to an earthquake, the reported behaviors are all over the map.
Why Animal Predictions Fail 00:08:58
But they are not either of these two behaviors.
This raises an important point, which is the inherent unreliability of almost all reports of animal behavior prior to a quake.
It is that such behavior is almost never noticed, recalled, or described until after the quake, at which point the reports are uselessly biased by expectations and ex post facto analysis.
There is, however, one part of the world where seismologists do pay attention to such reports and log them year-round.
Japan and China.
Let's find out why.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Malaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating, skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts, and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast, and this ship does always sell out.
Act now, or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Only once has animal behavior been claimed to have successfully predicted an earthquake, the 1975 Haicheng earthquake in China.
An evacuation order was issued and estimates have been made that as many as 100,000 lives were probably saved.
There are numerous reports of animals behaving strangely in the days leading up to the quake.
In nearly all its mentions in the literature, this prediction has been held up as a shining example of the plausibility of earthquake prediction and of the role of animals in particular.
However, under closer scrutiny, the story largely falls apart.
For some weeks, the region had been getting struck by a long series of foreshocks, any one of which is statistically just as likely to be the last in a cluster of earthquakes.
During this whole period, Chinese officials were making various predictions of larger quakes and issuing various evacuation orders.
They were almost all false alarms, and this was a pattern that had been long common in China and continues through today.
Nearly all the predictions are wrong.
It just so happened that in this one case, a major earthquake did follow.
If it hadn't been for the series of smaller quakes, which do not precede most large earthquakes and are not predictable themselves, it's unlikely that there would have been evacuation orders preceding the large quake.
As far as what role the animals may have played, all information reported about this has been anecdotal.
Not even the Chinese themselves have established any kind of guidelines for what constitutes predictive behavior or how it would be distinguished from non-predictive behavior.
Even today, the vast majority of research into the animal predictions comes from China and also from Japan, which lacks even China's one example of a successful earthquake prediction.
In those two countries, the belief that animal behavior is a reliable predictor of earthquakes is nearly universal, supported mainly, it appears, by little more than the confirmation bias established by the Haicheng case, as well as a lengthy cultural tradition.
The myth continues to be recycled in the news, and one strong reason is that every so often a fringe paper gets published somewhere making highly suspect claims that animals have been demonstrated to have foreknowledge of earthquakes.
Whenever such a paper gets published, it invariably gets picked up by the mass media news sources, further distorted and exaggerated, and duly impacts the public's perception of the phenomenon.
One notable example was in 2015, when headlines flashed around the world in major news outlets and consumer magazines that scientists have found animals can predict earthquakes up to three weeks in advance.
The source was a paper published in the journal Physics and Chemistry of the Earth titled Changes in Animal Activity Prior to a Major Earthquake in the Peruvian Andes.
Now I read this paper several times, and my best description of it is miraculously bizarre.
The paper centered around a statistical analysis of the number of animals captured on game cameras inside one Peruvian national park over a 30-day period prior to a magnitude 7 earthquake, and found that the number of animals spotted was lower than in other 30-day periods that did not precede large quakes.
They even concluded the most likely cause for the reduced animal activity, which I must quote, positive airborne ion injection at ground-to-air interface.
The only comparison of this time period to others was the earthquake.
They did not take into account other factors that may have a much larger impact on animal activity, such as weather or season.
The authors began with two unsupported assertions.
First, that positive airborne ions are, quote, known to be aversive to animals.
And second, they repeated a variation of a plausible notion popular among ball lightning and earthquake light enthusiasts, which claims that earthquakes produce massive electrical charges in the ground, though in this case they said that charge fluctuates and produces ultra-low frequency radiation.
They correlated this to a space weather event, basically nighttime aurora activity associated with very low frequency radiation, and suggested some unconvincing connection between the two.
This event was about a week before the quake, when they said animal activity began to be at its lowest.
In short, the entire paper was a word salad combining bits and pieces from a number of unrelated fields, many of which stem from the world of pseudoscience, and then drew a causal effect to a decline in animal activity prior to an earthquake.
Ironically, exactly the opposite of what nearly all other advocates claim, which is that animal activity increases before an earthquake.
It was an outlier result among a community of fringe ideas.
And yet it was sufficient to saturate the world's news with a report that animals can indeed predict earthquakes three weeks in advance.
This paper should stand as a powerful reminder that we should always be highly skeptical of astounding new science discoveries reported in the mass media.
What we're left with is a series of somewhat far-out answers in search of a question.
The purpose of a theory is to explain an observation, and in this case, we don't really have an observation.
We have countless anecdotes of unusual animal behavior, but they vary so widely and are all well within the range of normal animal activity that it's by no means clear that an explanation might be needed.
We lack both a plausible mechanism by which animals could predict quakes, and we lack evidence that they might do so.
Until either of these changes, which, considering the enormous amount of research that's been thrown at this so far, seems unlikely, the idea that animals can predict earthquakes is on very shaky ground.
Yeah, that's right, I went there.
Supporting Skeptoid Media 00:02:15
Most people don't listen to podcasts, so how do you share skeptoid content with friends and family?
Sit them down in front of the big screen and turn on Principles of Curiosity, the Skeptoid movie that distills all the concepts of critical thinking and scientific skepticism into a single enjoyable 40-minute film.
Principles of Curiosity was produced by Skeptoid Media in association with New Rule Productions and was shot on location in Death Valley and the U.S. Space and Rocket Center.
Best of all, it's free and you can get it right now at principlesofcuriosity.com.
This is the kind of content you can be a part of by becoming a supporting donor of Skeptoid Media, which you can do right now at skeptoid.com/slash important.
Get the movie at principlesofcuriosity.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection