All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Feb. 6, 2018 - Skeptoid
17:36
Skeptoid #609: Were There Irish Slaves in America?

Online articles claiming the first slaves in the Americas were white are fictional and racially motivated. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Debunking the Irish Slave Myth 00:06:51
One of the most pernicious of the racist myths in the United States is the falsehood that the first slaves here were not black Africans, but white Irish.
Thus, whites are just as much victims of slavery as blacks.
This is completely false, and it is peddled purely to promote a racist agenda.
Today we're going to point our skeptical eye directly at this lie and break it down to see where it comes from and why.
Irish slaves in America is today on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Were there Irish slaves in America?
Today we're going to get close to the darkest period in American history, the slavery era, which lasted hundreds of years from the early 1600s until the final abolition during the Civil War in the 1860s.
It is painful and sobering to remember for most of us, as the imposition of a life of enslavement on our fellow humans is unthinkable.
But for some of us, it is less so, because while the majority of us recognize it as the folly of racial divide, some few see it as not necessarily a racism issue, and have accordingly perpetuated a fabricated version of history in which blacks and whites were both equally enslaved.
While we've all heard at some point that slavery in America began not with Africans, but with whites from Ireland, history tells us a very different story.
The fact is that slavery was defined at its basest level by racial division, and there were never any Irish slaves in America.
Beginning in the early 1600s, poor immigrants from the British Isles, a majority of whom were Irish, came to the Americas by buying their ship passage with indenturement contracts.
This gave them a ticket to cross the ocean, but to pay for it, they entered a contractual obligation to work for nothing more than room and board for a period of time, usually four to seven years.
This began as soon as they stepped off the boat.
Thus, Irish indentured servants made up a substantial percentage of the labor force throughout the American colonies and islands of the Caribbean.
At the end of their term of service, they'd usually receive some cash and other recompense and would become ordinary settlers now trained in some trade.
Simultaneously, the slave industry began supplying American and Caribbean plantations and farms with African slaves.
Over 90% of the slaves went to the islands of the Caribbean, South America, and what's now Mexico.
Only a trifle over 5% went to the British colonies that later became the United States.
Few or none of them were taught trades, but were instead employed as manual laborers and houseworkers.
Yet the alternative literature has long supplied a constant stream of revisionism in an effort to portray indenturement contracts and slavery as the same thing.
The first slaves in America were whites, the claim is usually made, which is false, and treated even worse than black slaves.
False again.
This has culminated in memes like this one, shared online during what some white nationalists called White History Month.
Irish slaves were treated worse than any other race in the U.S. When is the last time you heard an Irishman bitching and moaning about how the world owes them a living?
An overtly racist rant against blacks.
To understand just how false this claimed equivalency is, let's examine the differences between slavery and indentured service.
Here are the most glaring.
Indentured servitude was almost always voluntary, except when it was applied as a criminal punishment or was the result of a rare illegal kidnapping.
Slavery was completely forced and involuntary.
A slave was considered property and could be mistreated or killed at the whims of the owner.
Indentured servants were freemen who had the same rights as anyone else.
Indentured servants had the recourse of the law to protect them from abuses.
Slaves never had any recourses or protections.
Indenturement was for a fixed period of time and applied only to the person contracted.
Slavery was permanent, inherited, and even passed on to offspring.
Indentured servants are paid, even if it's in nothing more than remission of their debt.
Slaves receive no recompense whatsoever.
Indenturement is nothing more than the state of having a contractual obligation.
If I help you pay your rent one month, and we agree that in return you'll spend a week pulling weeds in my field, that is indentured servitude.
If you fail to do that work, you've broken a contract, and in the 1600s that was a crime.
But while you're pulling weeds, you're still your own person with your private life and the same rights as anyone else.
And once the week is over, you're on your own again.
In many cases, indentured servitude in New England meant little more than a trade apprenticeship.
A young man, usually under 14 years old, would enter into a contract to learn the skills of a trade, which meant doing on-the-job training for several years for usually no pay other than room and board.
Here is part of the text from an actual 1640 indenture.
Know, all men, that I, Thomas Millard, with the consent of Henry Walcott of Windsor, under whose custody and care, and at whose charge I was brought over out of England into New England, do bind myself as an apprentice for eight years to serve William Pynchon of Springfield, his heirs and assignees, in an all manner of lawful employment unto the full extent of eight years beginning the 29th day of September, 1640.
Misinformation Fuels Open Racism 00:08:32
And the said William both conditioned to find the said Thomas meat, drink, and clothing fitting such an apprentice.
And at the end of this time, one new suit of apparel and 40 shillings in money.
Subscribe to this 28th October, 1640.
We don't even have to go back to the 1600s to find indentured apprenticeships in America.
After Mark Twain's father died in 1847, he was apprenticed to a printer, Joseph Ament, receiving little more than our Master Millard did.
Twain wrote, I was supposed to get two suits of clothes a year, but I didn't get them.
I got one suit and took the rest out in Lament's old garments, which didn't fit me in any noticeable way.
There will be no extra charge for my Mark Twain impression.
Apprenticeship hasn't even changed all that much.
Even today, half a million apprentices work under some contractual arrangement in various trades, though they generally get to live on their own, buy their own food, and wear their own clothes today.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together, get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Librarian and historian Liam Hogan has done a substantial amount of work tracking down the origins of the mythology that tries to misrepresent indenturement as slavery to promote a white nationalism agenda.
The most influential primary source appears to be an article written in 1833 by a Colonel Ellis, White Slaves and Bond Servants in the Plantations.
An article about how a general brain had written to Cromwell in 1656 urging the importation of African slaves into Jamaica to protect the welfare of the indentured workers currently suffering harsh conditions.
In his article, Ellis wrote, As the planters would have to pay for African slaves, they would have an interest in the preservation of their lives, which was wanting in the case of bond servants.
Ellis's article was republished a few years later in Popular Science Monthly and was cited in a 1926 academic work, which has been cited and recited enormously, but with an important tweak.
In addition to demoting General Brain to a colonel and confusing Jamaica with Barbados, most modern authors have repeated the quote, but changed bond servants to either Irish or whites.
The implication is that slaves were either African or Irish, black or white, didn't really make a difference.
A prime example is the 1993 book, They Were White and They Were Slaves by Holocaust denier Michael Hoffman, available as a PDF from Aryan websites.
Hoffman's exact trick was copied into a Kavanaugh Family History blog post in 2003 titled, Irish Slaves in the Caribbean.
This was then copy-pasted almost word for word to the far-left website Daily Cause in 2013 under the title The Slaves That Time Forgot.
It also served as the primary source for the most radical of all these articles, so bad that practically every sentence contains an overt lie.
2008's The Irish Slave Trade, The Forgotten White Slaves, by John Martin, published on the conspiracy theory website, Global Research.
This became the single most shared such article online.
In early 2017, white nationalists celebrated the new election of President Donald Trump with marches and events, some of which triggered civil unrest.
The online sharing of these articles accelerated at a furious pace, which we can see graphically by looking at the popularity of search terms, such as Irish slaves, on Google Trends.
We see the largest such spike shortly before the 2016 election.
Rhode Island's online magazine, Newport Buzz, republished the Daily Cause article in March of 2017, again triggering a spike in online interest in Irish slaves and fueling open racism with flagrant misinformation.
This body of alt history literature is characterized by many more errors than just this one disingenuous word substitution.
They take photos of prisoners in POW camps and mislabel them as Irish slaves in America.
These books and articles always exaggerate the numbers of Irish egregiously.
For example, the total number of people who migrated from Ireland to the Americas before the American Revolution is legitimately estimated at 165,000.
Yet one sentence alone in the Global Research article says that in a single nine-year period in the mid-1600s, 300,000 Irish were, quote, sold as slaves by the English.
There is so much absolutely untrue garbage in these articles that it's virtually impossible to know where to start to debunk them.
Who are the people inventing, exaggerating, and propagating these stories of Irish slaves throughout all these years?
Unfortunately, there are a number of groups whose preferred narrative this misinformation fits into, so they are strongly preconditioned to believe it.
The most obvious come from the realm of white supremacy, who wish to see whites as having been victimized in history just as much or more so than blacks.
This is also evidenced by the crossover of interest in Irish slavery with Holocaust denial, another dogma driven predominantly by racism.
A few advocates are Irish, seeking to excuse Irish complicity in the African slave trade.
Some come from the anti-American or anti-Western schools of thought who prefer to view Western establishment in as negative a light as possible.
So evil that it would enslave everyone regardless of race.
As if that's any more evil than enslaving because of race.
People who tend to believe in conspiracy theories often embrace this narrative as it purports to upend mainstream accepted history, a fundamental attraction of conspiracy theories.
But whatever the reason, some believe in it, or wherever you may have heard about it, the idea of the first slaves in the Americas having been white Irish is one about which you should always be skeptical.
Skepticism Is The Best Medicine 00:02:09
As long as we're on the subject of conspiratorial mindsets, I should let you all know about my newest book, Conspiracies Declassified, from Adams Media, an imprint of Simon and Schuster.
It's the true facts behind the 50 most popular conspiracy theories, most of which you've heard about on this show, some of which you haven't.
It is now available for pre-order, and pre-orders are super important because that's the number the major retailers look at to decide whether or not to put a giant stack of them in front of everyone's face when they walk into the bookstore.
Your pre-order of Conspiracies Declassified by Brian Dunning will shove critical thinking into the faces of conspiracy theorists everywhere.
Order now on Amazon.com or Barnes ⁇ Noble.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection