All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Nov. 28, 2017 - Skeptoid
17:50
Skeptoid #599: Listener Feedback: Creationism and More Dead Paul

Some updates, notes, and extra information sent in by listeners about recent episodes. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Listener Feedback and Logical Fallacies 00:06:40
Every urban legend podcast like this one gets tons of feedback, partly because we topple so many listeners' sacred cows, and partly because so many of these subjects are so interesting that it prompts people to go out and do more research on them.
And guess what happens?
They learn stuff, often stuff that I never found.
And so on these listener feedback shows, we get to hear what all of you have to add.
And we're going to do that now on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Listener feedback, Creationism, and More Dead Paul.
This week, we've got some feedback on past episodes, probably the best such collection yet.
We have a couple new bits of information that add a lot to some recent episodes you've heard.
Some follow-ups.
I engage in bitter disputes with some of you.
And I read an old Beatles fanzine.
But to get us started, here's me going off on a rant, since I know that's why you're here.
I'd like to begin with the episode that I've received more feedback on than any other in recent years, and it was episode 579 on measuring the age of the Grand Canyon.
I focused on one particular case, that of a coalition of young Earth creationists led by the Director of Research for Answers in Genesis, the group that runs the ARC Encounter in Kentucky, which I described as, quote, perhaps the greatest monument to anti-science on the planet.
They applied to do some research inside the Grand Canyon intended to prove that the canyon was formed recently, during Noah's flood, and were turned down for a number of valid reasons.
However, they eventually went thermonuclear and sued the national parks using the bottomless bankroll of the evangelical litigation group, the Alliance Defending Freedom.
Grand Canyon was forced to capitulate and had to grant the permit.
Here's where I ruffled feathers in the episode.
The creationists brought in Arizona Congressman Trent Franks, who wrote a letter to the National Park politely and diplomatically threatening them with legal action based on religious discrimination if they didn't grant the permit.
Brazenly ignoring the fact that the permit application was scientifically and procedurally bogus, it was, violate your policies and grant our invalid permit or we'll sue you for religious discrimination.
When I introduced Franks in the episode, the only description of him I gave was that he was co-chair for the International Religious Freedom Caucus and a noted anti-abortion advocate.
Feedback was fast and furious.
I got enough of these to fill Noah's Ark.
But I'll read just two of them.
From Irish Democracy on Twitter.
What does a congressman's view on abortion have to do with national park research issues?
And from listener Steve via email.
What does being a noted anti-abortion advocate have to do with anything in this context?
From a logical scientific standpoint, I don't see how wanting to save babies could put anyone in the category of being unscientific.
Surely this must fall into the category of one of the reasoning errors or logical fallacies you so often mention.
Keep up the otherwise good work.
I did reply to all of these people and told them basically the same thing, that he was brought in because of his activism on behalf of religious causes.
It's not like he's a geologist.
Granted, I could have worded it better to make that more clear, but I was disappointed that so many of those I replied to then told me that being anti-abortion has nothing to do with religion.
That's a position anyone can hold, regardless of their religious beliefs.
Obviously, that's true.
But you have to be consciously disingenuous to pretend that it's the case here.
Frank's anti-abortion advocacy is what put him on the map.
It is the significant manifestation of his evangelical activism.
If it wasn't, why else would the creationists have brought him in for their Grand Canyon research project?
Some of you even made the absurd assertion that there's no connection between anti-abortion groups and Christian groups.
In short, these commenters were making the same basic threat to me that Congressman Franks told the national parks.
Pretend that religious activism was not the shared purpose here, or we'll say you're committing reasoning errors and logical fallacies.
Now listeners know that I'm personally non-religious, but also that I never attack people of any religious faith for their beliefs.
But I won't give an inch when a factually untrue claim is made, such as the Grand Canyon was formed in Noah's flood.
And I won't accept being called anti-religion for that.
Dead horse beaten, moving on.
I have a brief follow-up on episode 480, The Nazi of Nanking, about John Raba, the Nazi Party official who saved so many Chinese lives during the Japanese destruction of Nanking, the so-called rape of Nanking, in which some 300,000 civilians were murdered.
Sailing the Mediterranean for Skeptics 00:02:24
For a long time, John Raba's house in Nanjing, the modern name of Nanking, has been open as a museum, as he's a greatly revered figure there.
But so much of that can be credited to the late author Iris Chang, who brought knowledge of the massacre to the world outside of China, and to whom my episode was dedicated, something I rarely do.
On April 7th, 2017, the new Iris Chang Memorial Hall was opened in Huayan in the Jiangsu Province.
It's a gorgeous museum.
If life happens to take you to that area, there are worse favors you could do yourself than to swing by.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating, skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts, and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast, and this ship does always sell out.
Act now, or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
London Rumors and Cancer Cures 00:06:17
Now let's turn to episode 576, where I had listeners send in your stories about strange things you'd witnessed.
And we talked about all the stories that were about mysterious UFO lights streaking through the sky.
I discussed how we should go about determining whether these are alien spacecraft.
Listener Plecht tweeted, In your Lights in the Sky episode, no one said anything about the lights being aliens, but you made that cognitive leap.
True, none of you said that.
In fact, one of you said explicitly that he didn't think it was extraterrestrial.
So a fair enough comment by Pleched.
What I was really addressing, and which I didn't point out in the show, as it was what I was talking about and didn't really need to be redundantly pointed out, is that this is the most common type of UFO report I've seen, and almost without exception, people on the internet who report it have positively identified these specs as alien spacecraft.
It's the explanation of, I don't know what it is, therefore, I do know what it is.
I wanted to use these stories to talk about how we go about analyzing what they mean.
I didn't want to limit the discussion to any one particular story or group of stories, but to the phenomenon as a whole, and to the most common explanation that people make.
Nevertheless, Pletched is right.
It wasn't most appropriate to use four stories from people who didn't conclude their UFOs were alien spacecraft to talk about the people who do make that conclusion.
Apologies to any of the four of you who thought that I was making that leap.
Another follow-up, this time on episode 362 about the apocryphal video game console Polybius, which seems to be getting more and more popular over time.
Researchers all seem to be in agreement that an anonymous posting on the gaming wiki coinop.org was the original use of the game's name Polybius.
But I said its best inspiration was the movie The Last Starfighter that came out some 15 years before the posting.
Turns out there's an even better inspiration, which I found researching the story further for a video.
The same year that Last Starfighter came out, there was a novel published called Arcade by Robert Max.
It was a near-perfect match for the Polybius urban legend.
The game in the book was called SpaceScape, and playing it caused kids to lose their minds.
Thus was the Polybius legend thoroughly precedented and inspired.
Whether the coinop.org poster read it or heard of it or not, we can't know.
Unless it's true that the poster was Kurt Kohler, the owner of coinop.org, at whom some have pointed their finger for being the likely author of the post.
We could always ask Kurt if he ever read Arcade.
He didn't reply to me.
There are a couple of emails I got on episode 589 about the Big Pharma conspiracy, specifically that pharmaceutical companies suppress the existence of a freely available, all-natural cure for all cancers.
There are a lot of logical problems with this particular conspiracy theory that make it virtually impossible to be true.
And I focused on a few of them.
Listeners wrote in with others that I didn't go into.
Let's hear what they are.
The first one is from listener Zev.
I thought you missed one of the most compelling arguments against the big pharma is suppressing a cure for cancer.
Specifically, that big pharma execs and their relatives die of cancer too.
Or does a big pharma exec say something like, well, I've got the cure to rid myself, spouse, parent, child, whoever of cancer, but I'm just going to let myself or loved one suffer and die just to make a few more bucks.
Listener Jared added, Also, any company that cured cancer would make all the money ever, which is a pretty big lure for companies that are supposedly holding out for treating cancer for money over time.
So add those to the long list of reasons why we shouldn't expect this conspiracy theory to be true.
Finally, a pretty significant update to the Paul is Dead story from episode 594, which discussed the 1969 origins of the urban legend that Paul McCartney had been killed in a car crash.
A Facebook comment from listener RB pointed to a blog post that mentioned the documentary Good Old Frida about their fan club secretary.
In it, she reads a blurb from one of the Beatles' monthly book issues saying Paul is alive and well.
I couldn't find the blurb she read in the film, but I did find a bit more, and it's in the February 1967 issue of The Beatles book, which I have here in my hand, and just getting hold of it was no small feat.
It says, False rumor.
Stories about the Beatles are always flying around Fleet Street.
The 7th of January was very icy with dangerous conditions on the M1 motorway linking London with the Midlands.
And toward the end of the day, a rumor swept London that Paul McCartney had been killed in a car crash on the M1.
But of course, there was absolutely no truth in it at all, as the Beatles press officer found when he telephoned Paul's St. John's Wood home and was answered by Paul himself, who had been home all day with his black mini Cooper safely locked up in the garage.
So this pushes the origin of the legend back to January 1967.
I skimmed the other issues of the fanzine back through November 1966, the date given for the crash in the modern version of the legend, and found no mention of it.
So unless some London newspaper ran a mention of the rumor, this may be its earliest print reference.
I'm sure someone out there is listening to this and will come up with something even older, and when they do, you can rest assured I'll pass it along here.
Supporting a Listener-Driven Podcast 00:02:24
So, keep that feedback coming, folks.
200,000 heads are better than one, and this is the way we improve the quality of this resource for everyone.
Email me at brian at skeptoid.com with any and all awesome and amazing feedback.
A quick reminder to subscribe to the Skeptoid podcast companion email, the weekly email that comes out every Tuesday with each new episode.
It's stuffed with additional content like the wonder of the week and throwbacks to episodes from 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 shows ago.
Over 25,000 of you get this each week.
And that's an amazing number.
But consider that it's only about one in eight of those of you hearing this now.
That means about 88% of you are missing out on the companion content.
It's free, so what are you waiting for?
Come to skeptoid.com and click on newsletter.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection