All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Oct. 27, 2015 - Skeptoid
17:53
Skeptoid #490: Deconstructing the Tasaday Tribe

Some say this tribe of "gentle savages", discovered in 1971, was just a hoax. The truth isn't quite so simple. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Tassadai Tribe Hoax 00:10:55
If you've ever heard of the Tassadai tribe, the supposedly uncontacted primitive tribe discovered in the Philippines in 1971, you've probably also heard that they were eventually revealed to have been a hoax.
A sideshow attraction cooked up for the National Geographic cameras.
But it turns out that wasn't quite true either.
As with so many things, the truth turned out to be much more nuanced and complex.
Deconstructing the Tassadai tribe is coming up next on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and we'll replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Deconstructing the Tassadai Tribe DeFall was a semi-nomadic trapper in the southern part of the Philippine island of Mindanao.
Throughout the 1960s, he had sporadic contact with a group of some two dozen people living in Stone Age conditions, who knew Dafaul as the only other person in the world.
He brought them steel knives and taught them better hunting techniques.
Eventually, DeFall alerted the Philippine government, who sent their special representative in charge of national minority groups, Manuel Elizalde Jr.
The people Elizalde found amazed him.
They were completely isolated and knew nothing of the outside world.
What followed was a media explosion.
The Tassadai, an undiscovered Stone Age tribe, became worldwide celebrities almost overnight.
That was in 1971.
15 years later, the Tassadai story was turned on its head when Swiss and German journalists caught them wearing modern clothes and living in wooden huts, hurriedly changing for the camera.
But most damningly, the Tassadai told the film crews that Elizalde had paid them back in 1971 to take their clothes off and pretend to be a Stone Age tribe.
A 1988 anthropology conference brought the question to the firing line and mountains of evidence were produced, seemingly proving that the entire thing had been a hoax, probably orchestrated by the wealthy Elizalde, who, it was claimed, hoped to create a protected reserve to secure mining and timber rights for himself.
The original 1971 scientists were flabbergasted, incredulous that they could have been duped.
Neither side would budge.
The question was left as an open rift with anything but a consensus.
The rift gaped for years, and by then the Tassadai had integrated substantially with neighboring tribes and new research was no longer possible.
And then, little by little, the old evidence was re-examined.
The language was studied in closer detail.
And today, a theory for the enigmatic Tassidae has emerged that seems to be what probably happened.
And it may come as a surprise to many.
A note on pronunciation.
From watching the films and videos, one learns that the Western scientists and media people tend to say Tassadai, while the locals in the translator tend to say Tassadai.
Seems to me the latter is more likely correct, so that's what I'm going to use here.
Language, in fact, turns out to be key to this mystery.
Linguists established that the Tassadai tongue was a unique dialect of a local language called Cotobato-Manobo.
And it's here we introduce a branch of linguistic science I had not heard of before, glotto chronology.
It's a way of measuring the age of a language by counting the number of changes that accumulate over time compared to the language from which it broke off.
Glotto chronology gives us a way to estimate how long ago that separation took place.
Teodoro Yamson, one of the 1971 linguists, came up with an estimate of 800 years.
And so 800 years became the generally accepted and reported amount of time that the Tassidae had been isolated.
This remained the theory for 15 years.
In all, 14 scientists studied the Tassadai firsthand in the 1970s, including ethnobotanists, linguists, archaeologists, and anthropologists.
And none had any doubts of their authenticity.
And then journalist Oswald Eaton caught the Tassidae with their pants on, so to speak.
Two Tassidae, through a translator named Galang, told a 2020 film crew that they were actually hired from two local tribes, the Blitmanobo and the Taboli, and paid to act like cave dwellers.
Things quickly unraveled.
Scientists who had always been skeptical came out of the woodwork.
It was at the International Congress on Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences in Zagreb in 1988 where everything hit the fan.
In one camp were the 1971 scientists and authors such as John Nance who had written The Gentle Tassadai.
And in the other were TV producers such as 2020's Judith Moses who had just completed The Tribe That Never Was, plus a raft of scientists of various disciplines who pointed to all kinds of holes in the Tassidae canon.
Charges of deceit and gullibility nearly overwhelmed the Congress.
In this environment, cooler heads prevailed and stood to present the proof that the Tassidae were a hoax, in black and white.
Listen to some of the arguments presented at the Congress.
Where the Tassidae lived was only a three-hour walk from agricultural communities, yet they claimed not to be aware of their existence.
The cave where they lived was unlike any cave dwelling known to archaeology, in that it was clean-swept and contained no trash or evidence of habitation or food preparation.
They claimed to be gatherers, yet possessed no baskets or other carrying technology, relying only on their hands.
They had no hunting or fishing technology of any kind, again, relying only on their hands.
Unlike any other culture known, they had no rituals, no religion, no folklore, no chief, no experts or specialists or shaman.
Significantly, they had not suffered any outbreak of disease from their 1971 contact, which would surely have been the case if they had indeed been isolated for centuries.
Gerald Barriman, an anthropologist and ethicist who is a champion of the hoax explanation, presented these objections as proof that the Tassidai story was simply full of too many holes.
He had not studied them in person, but found that the picture that had been drawn of their culture was too implausible scientifically and was likely gilded up by Elizalde for the benefit of Westerners who were, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, culturally obsessed with the hippie movement and a return to nature, craving a lifestyle that rejected technology and civilization.
Barriman's presentation was thorough, convincing, and devastating.
Barriman's particular style of attack against the authenticity of the Tassadai had one important effect on the field.
It cleared away all of the ideological baggage.
For what he said was pregnant with truth, Nance's book, plus an iconic National Geographic article, and the public embracing of the Tassidae had always been colored with shades of the gentle primitive who had no words for enemy or war.
Had we been so obsessed with what we wanted the Tassadai to be that we lost sight of what the evidence showed they actually were.
Then the same two Tassidae who had confessed the hoax to 2020 recanted and told a BBC film crew that Galang, the translator, had paid them in cigarettes to tell the hoax story to fool the 2020 crew.
People became less sure of what they thought they believed.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Malaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
A Genuine Independent Dialect 00:05:20
It was in this newly cleared field that the scientists began to take another more objective view of the evidence that had been gathered.
Their simple tools, which seemed ridiculously flimsy and more like props to the hoax believers, turned out to be no flimsier and cruder than tools from similar cultures who used them for a short time for simple tasks.
And once again, the language rose to the surface as the focus of the investigation.
Hoax proponents had pointed out at least one flaw in the Tassadai language, that it contained several foreign words.
The Tassadai could not have learned these words if they'd been isolated.
But sociolinguist Carol Maloney had discovered in 1972 that they'd learned these words from DeFall.
A similar, deeper review of each anomaly found that plausible explanations like this consistently solved each puzzle.
Lawrence Reed is a linguist who has done substantial research into the Tassidae language since the controversy at the 1988 Congress in Zagreb.
What he determined is that the Tassidae dialect is indeed separate from the Manobo spoken elsewhere.
It bears the markers of a genuine, independent dialect, and it is not plausible for the Tassidae to have been hoaxing the original scientists.
Experienced linguists are able to identify many patterns within a language that are not readily apparent even to native speakers, and by careful logging of conversations over many weeks with all the Tassidae, including children unsophisticated in the arts of deception, no slip-ups were caught that would have revealed that they were faking a dialect.
Ethnobotanist Douglas Yin had used similar techniques on the Tassidae children in the 1970s and was easily able to tell which plants they knew and which they did not.
The Tassidae were definitely not acquainted with cultivated crops.
Moreover, glotto chronological techniques had improved in the intervening decades and linguists were able to refine the statistical models.
The new estimated date of separation for the Tassidae was only about 150 years before their rediscovery.
Previously, sociologists had speculated that the reason the Tassidae originally split off from their village and retreated into a remote wilderness was to escape an epidemic of disease or perhaps a tribal dispute of some kind.
But the new date, indicating a split sometime in the 1800s, suggested an even darker possibility.
It was a time in which both European and Asian slave raiders were actively hacking through the jungles and capturing tribesmen, and sometimes whole villages.
It is entirely possible that the Tassidae descended from people hiding for their very lives.
To a limited degree, Manuel Elizalde's involvement as a hoax perpetrator was a red herring.
It is now clear that he encouraged exaggeration of the Tassidai's primitivity for the 1970s media.
For example, they did typically wear manufactured fabric, but Elizalde persuaded them to take it off for the scientists and the original media.
The Tassidae had, evidently, engaged in limited trade with DeFall and others, and probably had for the duration of their century and a half history.
Elizalde, as a millionaire crony of the corrupt dictator, was broadly distrusted, probably rightfully so, but there is no evidence that he profited from the Tassidae as the hoax proponents charged.
His influence on the case appears to be little more than some camera-friendly embellishments.
As best we can tell, the Tassidae were part of the Blit Manobo until they fled sometime in the 1800s, probably with very good reason, and like many other groups did throughout the Philippines.
They maintained a cautious relationship with selected friends as needed for basic trade items.
As generations passed, the deliberate isolation that began as a necessity evolved into a way of life.
Eventually, the inevitable collision with modern society happened, and the descendants coped as best they could.
DeFaul may have told them one thing, Elizalde another, the film crews still another, but through it all they simply did what they did and coped like any of us would.
If someone asked something strange of them, they did their best to oblige.
that some in the west might consider their small society a kind of utopian Eden was not something that entered their minds, nor did the fact that people were arguing over them in a conference room in Croatia.
Today they live in elevated huts in surplus western clothes, smoking cigarettes and plowing their fields, happily intermarried with the monobo and probably marveling that anyone was ever interested in them at all.
And so fades away the story of the Tassidai and of a controversy they scarcely comprehended.
Sustainability is always an important theme in science.
I work full-time bringing you Skeptoid every week on schedule, but it's not quite sustainable.
Support Skeptoid Today 00:01:33
I need your support.
If you enjoy the show, please come to skeptoid.com and click on support skeptoid and see how easy it is to make your monthly micropayments keep Skeptoid viable for many years to come.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection