All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Aug. 11, 2015 - Skeptoid
19:00
Skeptoid #479: Chemicals

Chemicals are deadly, delicious, essential and basically, everything. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Fear of Chemicals 00:11:29
Few words evoke such terror in some people as does the word chemical.
If you're of a scientific mindset, you're well aware that everything is chemicals, and that's not a fact to be frightened of.
But others consider anything chemical to be poisonous and artificially produced.
Which is the better way to regard this weighty word?
Chemicals are coming right up on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
For Brian Dunning, this is Kevin Hoover from Skeptoid.com.
Chemicals.
The very word bubbles with all sorts of associations.
It could trigger memories of a childhood chemistry set or brutal chemistry exams in college.
Maybe you think of environmental disasters such as chemical spills, heinous chemical weapons, or that lengthy list of scientific words in tiny print on your candy bar wrapper.
Are chemicals the life-giving vaccines that eradicate disease or the junk proffered by the pusher man?
Are they vitamins and nutritional supplements at the wellness aisle or the vile foamy liquids cooked up in chemical weapons labs?
Basically, are chemicals friend or foe?
The simple answer is yes.
Chemicals are all that and more.
Every solid, liquid, or gas is composed of chemical substances in various combinations.
If it's made of atoms and molecules, it has chemical properties.
The Mona Lisa, Mom's Apple Pie, Buzz Aldrin, the Liberty Bell, Chipotle Tofu Ice Cream, hydrogen bombs, your baby's blue eyes, and even the brain you're using to process these words, all chemicals.
Chemicals are misunderstood, perhaps because they're so full of contradictions.
Their names are hard to say, and some have numbers in them that don't sound very wholesome at all, especially when added to food.
How do we sort out which chemicals are benign and which are deadly?
There are a couple of simple popular ways.
Scientific experimentation or blind fear.
Or we could go back to blanket acceptance as in the days of better living through chemistry, but that didn't work out quite as planned.
This is the age of industrial chemistry.
With vastly widened application of chemical research in manufacturing, it has attained importance undreamed of just a few years ago.
All around us are the products of modern chemistry.
We've learned a lot of hard lessons since that era when dazzling new products and solutions for just about everything that ails us were going to come pouring out of a test tube.
Nowadays, instead of miracle products, chemicals are commonly associated more with toxic waste and environmental pollution or suspicious additives in food and medicine.
The words toxic and chemical have been used together so much that they may seem synonymous.
Chances are you've seen a Facebook meme of some insalubrious image with block letters blaming chemicals or ads for chemical-free products and other appeals to chemophobia.
Chemophobia is just what it sounds like, an irrational fear or obsession with chemicals.
There's a phobia for almost everything, and like the others, chemophobia takes healthy concern to an irrational level, lumping together all chemicals regardless of quantity or toxicity.
You can blame our general lack of scientific literacy for this and other popular misapprehensions, for example, the mythology about vaccines and GMOs, or evolution and climate change.
In all these cases, there are serial misinformers happy to build on the ignorance, fluff up the fear and loathing, and pocket the profits.
Chemical-free.
You have every right to be annoyed, even insulted by someone trying to sell you something that's chemical-free, whether it's food, shampoo, or cigarettes.
The marketers are assuming you know little about chemicals and suffer from chemophobia, and maybe with their help, you do.
For those who know something about chemistry, the impossible claims made them willing to put up so the marketers would shut up.
In 2008, the British Royal Society of Chemistry offered a £1 million bounty to anyone who could provide it with a chemical-free product, knowing full well that this was impossible and that it would never have to pay.
Woo workers, the various social media babes and rangers and mommies who demonize chemicals, often sell them under happy hipster names.
I don't want to elevate any one brand of snake oil, but just visit the online stores of today's more militant chemophobe codependent commentators.
There, you'll discover all manner of costly nostrums, many with the term detox or cleanse built into their name and all composed of chemicals.
Here we have chemicals marketing chemical-free chemicals to chemicals based on fear of chemicals.
If you were able to snap your fingers and make all food chemical-free, you might want to cover your ears or even take shelter, since food containers everywhere would suddenly enclose a vacuum as perfect as interstellar space.
They aren't designed for that, and one can only imagine the imploded, crumpled wreckage that would litter your kitchen and supermarket food aisles everywhere.
The name game In the commercially lucrative alternative reality governed by the naturalistic fallacy, there is some unexplained linkage between what you call something and whether or not it's good or bad for you or even a chemical at all.
If you can't say it, don't eat it, famously advised food activist Michael Pollen.
Don't buy products with more than five ingredients or any ingredients you can't easily pronounce.
Glib, superficially sensible, and easy to remember, this advice isn't just foolish, it's impossible to follow.
Chemical names are as incomprehensible to the lay person as they are sensible to chemists.
That's because they're determined by a standard set of rules for nomenclature defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics, so that chemicals are known by the same names everywhere.
This results in multisyllabic terms which may include numbers that sound far removed from everyday life.
The superstar of unpronouncedophobia is our old friend, that deadly dihydrogen monoxide.
That DHMO, otherwise known as H2O or water, is dangerous has never been in dispute.
DHMO scare websites play it straight, listing the substances' associations with disease, environmental destruction, even terrorism and corporate greed.
Big corporations, who know you're hooked on it, make huge profits purveying this hazardous chemical.
And as any sailor, submariner, swimmer, skier, surfer, or scuba diver knows, DHMO deserves a healthy respect.
DHMO is drenched in comic potential.
It's spawned radio DJ hoaxes, fake petition drives, and has been used to expose scientific ignorance among political candidates.
Beyond the rather repetitive hilarity, DHMO is a fine way to demonstrate how, with scary terms and selective information, A vital, inescapable substance like water can be made out as a toxic chemical, which it can be, but only in the wrong dose or place or state or time.
Should you wish to lower your argumentation standards and challenge the name gamers on their own terms, you might ask them, if I learn to pronounce it, does that render an ingredient harmless?
Do chemicals behave differently in different individuals based on their powers of verbal articulation?
If that witty rejoinder doesn't get you unfriended, you'll likely see the goalposts move.
The typical chemophobic fallback position is that synthetic chemicals are the baddies, while natural ones are good to go.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Synthetic versus natural.
The naturalistic fallacy is alive and well, thriving in fact, in chemophobia world.
Cultivated in the fertile soil of scientific illiteracy and nourished with fear, misapprehensions about synthetic and natural chemicals flourish.
Serial misinformers work this rich vein of confusion, marketing products that promise to cleanse one from the effects of toxic man-made chemicals.
Some even suggest that synthetic medicine isn't necessary, that natural food and herbs are sufficient to prevent disease.
As with the pronunciation principle, the synthetic versus natural proposition is as easy to puncture as it remains persistent.
For example, my town of Arcata, California has a hillside quarry that requires costly federal permits and continuing attention.
Dose Makes the Poison 00:05:18
The rocky field at the edge of a forest is laden with all natural, gluten, and GMO-free asbestos.
Naturalism claims many well-intentioned victims.
Actress and theoretical biochemist Gwyneth Paltrow told Cosmopolitan magazine that, We're human beings and the sun is the sun.
How can it be bad for you?
I don't think anything that is natural can be bad for you.
Modern medicine, which is clearly in the pocket of big sunscreen, dissents from the Paltrow doctrine in holding that naturally induced melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma are, arguably, rather bad for you.
In an ironic twist, as this episode is being prepared, a brand of all-natural mineral-based sunscreen promoted by another actress, Jessica Alba, is fielding complaints from consumers for being ineffective in letting them and their babies get sunburned.
By the way, the active ingredient in Alba's sunscreen is zinc oxide, a chemical which has some effectiveness as a sunblock and is also used in nuclear reactors.
Appeal to yuckiness.
Do you see what I did there?
I associated an ingredient with something dangerous.
That's a common practice among chemophobes and those who play on their ignorance.
This tactic, which has been called the appeal to yuckiness, is used to great effect by internet superstar Vani Hari, aka the food babe.
She mounted a campaign against the chemical azodicarbonamide used in bread making, based on the fact that it's also used in rubber production.
After a scare campaign against the yoga mat chemical, the sandwiched chain Subway caved and took azodicarbonamide out of its bread.
Another successful yuckiness-based quack mail campaign involved an ingredient used in beer production called isinglass, the principal argument being that it is derived from fish swim bladder.
After a petition drive garnered thousands of signatures, beer manufacturers posted online the ingredient lists Hari had demanded.
In each case, she was playing on gross associations, not the actual benefit or safety of the substance.
The dose makes the poison.
Long, long ago, before there was an internet to propagate misinformation, Paracelsus, who founded the science of toxicology, told us that all things are poison and nothing is without poison.
Only the dose makes a thing not a poison.
In other words, the dose makes the poison.
Six centuries later, Paracelsus' axiom has been superseded by the all-knowing food babe, who instructs, There is just no acceptable level of any chemical to ingest ever.
Some chemicals are so toxic that even small amounts can be harmful.
But with common food ingredients like salt, sugar, vitamins, and the dreaded dihydrogen monoxide, it's all about how and how much of them you ingest.
Chemical alarmists know this on some level, even if they don't acknowledge it.
Anti-vaccinationist Jenny McCarthy rails against minute amounts of mercury in vaccines while admittedly using Botox beauty treatments.
Botox has made from the botulinum toxin an all-natural chemical composition which is the most acutely toxic substance known.
McCarthy and other anti-vaxxers have managed to do something that medical science can't, despite hundreds of scientific studies, and that's to link the vanishingly small amounts of mercury and formaldehyde in some vaccines to that go-to disease for fearmongers, autism.
The few vaccines that still contain trace amounts of fast-dissipating ethylmercury contain less than half of the more persistent methylmercury found in a can of tuna.
When a six-year-old child receives a bouquet of vaccines, that might include around 300 micrograms or millionths of a gram of formaldehyde.
If this concerns you, you better stay away from organic pears.
Just one of those formaldehyde bombs might contain 12,000 micrograms of the naturally occurring substance, 40 times as much as the vaccines.
Your body even manufactures its own formaldehyde for various essential processes, 2 to 3 micrograms per gram of blood.
We do need to know what the toxic and lethal doses are for various chemical substances, and those thresholds are well understood in the world of toxicology.
It's a good thing, too.
Too much tincture of tenderness transformed Milton the Monster into an obsequious gentlemonster, while Dr. Jekyll's potion, even made according to recipe, brought out the toxic, terrible Mr. Hyde.
It's easy to make light of chemophobia, as the panic is so ill-founded as to be laughable.
But Skeptoid is loaded with serious resources for chemical amusement of the educational variety.
What you'll find here and elsewhere is that science doesn't tidally line up with anyone's politics or care what anyone thinks.
The good news for chemophobes is that 95% of the universe isn't chemicals.
Dark matter and energy apparently aren't made of standard-issue atoms and molecules, so the universe is almost chemical-free.
On Earth, where chemicals abound, most are manageable and many are quite tasty, even lovable.
Get to know your friends in the chemical kingdom following all applicable safe handling practices, particularly with pairs.
Support Skeptoid Today 00:02:09
As Skeptoid's Allison Hudson observed, you'd be amazed at what's not worth being afraid of.
In this new world of industrial chemistry, the horizon is unlimited.
Unexplored potentialities back.
Hidden secrets of nature sound a call to this young man, the industrial chemist, the pioneer of tomorrow.
Make sure you're also getting the weekly Skeptoid companion email.
Otherwise, you're only getting a half dose of the show.
Come to skeptoid.com and click on the members portal to sign up.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Kevin Hoover from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection