All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Dec. 30, 2014 - Skeptoid
16:52
Skeptoid #447: Listener Feedback: Cryptozoology

We respond to questions about cryptids asked by listeners to our recent episodes. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Addressing Listener Feedback 00:07:45
Today we're going to answer a lot of listener feedback emails who posed some questions frequently asked of Bigfoot skeptics.
Reasonable questions too, like, certainly all the sightings can't be hoaxes.
And isn't gigantopithecus a reasonable precedent for Bigfoot?
And you can't use the lack of carcasses in the forest as proof they don't exist, because no carcasses last long out there.
We're answering these and more right now on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Listener feedback, Cryptozoology.
Any public discussion of Bigfoot or other mythical beasties always delivers plenty of emotion.
Some of it humorous, some of it enraged, much of it passionate.
It's one of those topics that is amusing to some people, a source of interesting intellectual or zoological discourse to others, and to some, it is an absolute religion.
It's one of those fringe topics that draws a small number of people into its deepest core, turning them into fanatics who will defend the existence of their favorite cryptid in spite of all other information, even that coming from their fellow believers.
Consequently, it always makes for interesting feedback emails to me.
But what's more interesting are the questions resulting from coherent and reasoned discourse.
Today we're going to open the mailbag and respond to some such questions asked by listeners to our recent episodes on cryptozoological creatures.
The first such question comes from Dave in Florida in response to the episode on the Falk Monster, the creature made famous in the pseudo-documentary film The Legend of Boggy Creek.
It was in broad strokes an Arkansas version of Bigfoot.
Dave wrote, It's an awesome story with some basis of truth and myth combined.
Personally, it's hard to believe that 100% of the sightings are fabricated.
When I was a little kid reading all of the books written by the early famous Bigfoot authors, one of the statements that truly convinced me Bigfoot had to be real, reminder, when I was a little kid, was that either the greatest hoax in all of history has been pulled off by thousands of people over hundreds of years, or there was an unknown species of great ape living in the American Northwest.
Even at that age, I knew hoaxes of that magnitude aren't possible.
So I was convinced the other possibility had to be the true one.
And just as Dave says, it's hard to believe that 100% of the sightings are fabricated.
In fact, it's virtually impossible.
Does that force us to accept the great ape theory?
No, and the reason is something I was too young to understand at the time.
This is a false dichotomy.
Greatest hoax in history or Bigfoot being real are not the only two possibilities.
In fact, they are the two least likely of all possibilities.
Certainly some sightings are fabricated.
I don't think anyone denies that.
But what's much more likely to come from your average person is an honest, yet mistaken, identification.
Unless someone finds a real Bigfoot one day, honest misidentifications are probably the cause of nearly all trustworthy reports.
We can say this with increasing confidence, and the next couple of listener emails will help us focus in on the reasons we can be pretty certain that no Bigfoot-like creatures exist anywhere in North America.
Here's a suggestion from Brenda from Kalamazoo, Michigan.
I'm wondering if maybe gigantopithecus could be the so-called Bigfoot creatures being sighted.
The falc monster could be one of them.
We know a lot about Giganopithecus, the genus of great apes that lived in Asia perhaps as recently as 100,000 years ago.
The reason we know so much is that we have both ancient fossil evidence and more recent dental evidence of them.
They were essentially big orangutans who knucklewalked on all fours.
We know they didn't stand upright very often because their jaw was too narrow for the neck to be vertical.
Also, they were just way too enormous and heavy.
Their diet was mainly soft bamboo shoots, which we can tell from their teeth.
And we also know that they didn't live in North America, because their fossil record exists in Asia.
Fossil evidence exists for the ancestors of every animal that exists in North America.
And at no time were there ever any great apes living on the continent.
We can be really, really sure of this.
And one reason is that we have substantial fossil evidence of the primates that did used to live in North America.
They were tiny little guys around 50 million years ago when North and South America were separated.
But as the climate changed, all American primates, except those living near the equator, died off, which unfortunately was the end of all North American species.
Even though the continents later became connected, Mexico was a climate barrier that no primate species ever crossed.
So we do have a fairly complete record of primates in North America.
And it has never included any great apes at all.
Another argument that I always found compelling as a kid was mentioned by Ron from Calgary, Alberta.
Ever see the body of a deer or a moose or even a rabbit out in the forest?
Neither have I, nor anyone else who spends any amount of time off the pavement.
Bodies don't last very long out in the wilderness.
This argument has often been used to challenge the assertion made by scientists that if there were any Bigfoots or boggy creek monsters out there, someone would have stumbled across a dead one at some point.
Some cryptozoologists have argued that that's not the case.
Even if the Bigfoot Society does not bury their dead, natural predation erases all traces of animal corpses very quickly.
This is true, but it's not instantaneous.
A great piece of evidence from current pop culture is Les Stroud's TV show Survivor Man, which he films all by himself in remote wilderness locations and arguably spends more time in the wilderness than most of us.
Promoting Critical Thinking Skills 00:02:08
He happens across the carcasses of dead large animals all the time and is himself a Bigfoot believer.
Or do a Google image search for bear carcass, moose carcass, or any animal you want, and you'll see that we do, in fact, find the remains of all known animals in the wild naturally.
In Death Valley, where I hang out, we find the bones of wild burrows practically every day.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
The Power of Skepticism 00:05:48
Matt from Sacramento, California took issue with my episode on Delois Ape, which is really just a hoaxed 1920 photograph of a dead spider monkey propped up on a crate.
We have sufficient documentary evidence to know that Delois took the picture in town when his pet monkey died.
But the tall tale he invented to go along with it is what created the legend.
They'd been on an oil prospecting expedition, but had been attacked by natives and no fewer than 17 of Delois' men had been killed.
The straggling survivors, including Delois himself with an arrow wound in his leg, stopped briefly to rest on the shore of a river when he claims they were attacked by the ape and shot it, then took the picture.
Matt, who says he gave me a C grade for the quality of my arguments why this was implausible, said, Whether the monkey is four and a half feet tall or two feet, the measurements of the scaled size of the crate remains totally reasonable.
A high-res copy of the photo clearly shows the crate is three planks tall.
These planks could easily be three inches to eight inches wide, making the box between 10 inches or 25 inches tall.
Neither measurement is unreasonable for a crate.
Examining the high-res photo shows the area around the monkey is clearly a shoreline.
Outside of a couple cut shrubs, it could be completely natural.
To extrapolate from that, behind the cameras a large man-made clearing and use that to argue against the validity of the picture is clearly a straw man.
Which it is because I didn't say that.
Also, Brian notes that it's only 15 kilometers from the site of the supposed shooting to the city of La Fria, asking, how likely is it that a geology party would allow 17 men to die without simply making the short return trip to La Fria?
Simply ignoring the fact in a flat jungle, a 15-kilometer trek takes three to four days.
Add in mountainous terrain and weather, that can climb to five to seven days.
Brian is supporting his argument with invalid facts.
It's flat as a billiard table west of Lafria, and even in 1920, the whole region was laced with oil roads and packing trails.
Lafria was only one of dozens of oil towns in that part of Venezuela, and these prospecting trips took no more than a week or two at most.
They certainly never went anywhere on foot for that long.
Photos from the day show trucks, pack mules, and mule wagons.
Given how easy it is to find this stuff, see the books in the references section of the episode transcript page, I felt it was implausible that Delois, having lost 17 men and running on foot for their lives from pursuing tribesmen, would have been carrying wooden crates of stuff by hand or bothering to make a nice clearing with their machetes as a backdrop for the photo of the unfortunate monkey.
Matt says my facts are invalid.
I invite Matt to point out the errors from my reference materials or produce better ones.
As far as my assessment of the credibility of Delois' story, that is of course a matter of opinion and was never presented as otherwise.
On several episodes about cryptids, a few people mentioned that respected primatologist Jane Goodall has expressed her belief in Bigfoot.
And so she has, though also adding there's an element of romance in her decision to believe.
I had some responses to this, but I threw the question up on Twitter, and here are some of the best replies.
Justin Nancy said, She's considered to be the world's foremost expert on chimpanzees.
Chimpanzees are not Bigfoots.
Bigfoots are something else.
Gregory Scheffler said, like asking a herpetologist for help studying reptoids.
James Capuch said, no, unless there's some reason to consider her as such, then why should you do so?
Nerdosaurus Hex said if she's got solid evidence, that's what it's all about.
Black Pig said, no, unless she has documented pics, expert witnesses can still be wrong, and humanoid would be outside her field of expertise.
And the two honorable mentions, Leonardo Schianardo said, How can any source of information be considered reliable when we're talking about something that's never been proven to exist?
Dumbass Media Empire said, nobody is a reliable source on Bigfoot.
You'd need to study an actual live one.
And my number one favorite, Audrey Meadowbrook, said, I know a lot about horses, but I do not consider myself qualified to speak about unicorns.
It's quite simple.
There is no such thing as an expert on something that nobody has ever been able to study.
So listeners, keep that feedback coming in.
There's no episode I've ever done that's pleased everyone, so you've probably all got a bone to pick with me somewhere.
Just probably not a Sasquatch bone you found in the forest.
And two-way discourse is how we learn to understand each other.
So please drop me a line or comment on the transcript page for any episode.
Make sure you're also getting the weekly Skeptoid companion email, otherwise you're only getting a half dose of the show.
Come to skeptoid.com and click on the members portal to sign up.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Join the Member Community 00:01:06
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection