All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Nov. 4, 2014 - Skeptoid
16:40
Skeptoid #439: A Skeptical Look at the News

How we look at the news is as important as where we get it. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Skeptical Tools for News 00:06:59
It shouldn't surprise anyone that one of our most popular pieces of advice here at Skeptoid is to always be skeptical of what you hear in the news.
But by itself, that isn't a very useful piece of advice.
Today we give some great instructions on how you can do just that.
How to regard the news, how to filter it, and what to look for.
That's coming up next on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and we'll replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Craig Good from Skeptoid.com.
A skeptical look at the news.
One of my favorite things about Skeptoid is how it makes us better, more informed consumers of food and medicine and more discriminating about claims for products of all types.
Applying scientific literacy and critical thinking skills really does keep us safer and healthier.
Today I want to talk about being smart consumers of information.
In other words, how we look at the news may be even more important than where we get it.
Two of the most useful Skeptoid episodes ever were Brian's excellent How to Spot a Crap Website and How to Spot Pseudoscience, each with a checklist of warning signs.
So let's dive in and see if we can't come up with a similar list of things to keep in mind when evaluating any story in the news media.
Now don't worry, this isn't going to be one long whine about the mainstream media and the sorry state of science reporting.
And I'm going to do my best to keep from being mired in any kind of political quagmire.
I've been fortunate to have had over 30 years experience in media and using it to tell stories.
I hope my perspective helps provide tools you can use to evaluate the news.
First, pause to remember what business they're in.
The vast majority work on an advertising model, meaning they are paid to get eyeballs and or ears on ads.
Never forget, if you use a service for free, you aren't the customer, you're the product.
Note that while all media have some things in common, the mainstream media isn't some monolithic cabal that works all one way.
That idea is conspiracy theory thinking.
Different media have different ways of conveying information.
Some are better at one kind and some at others.
A printed article, for example, may succinctly convey the words that were said, but a video interview conveys emotional content like facial expressions and tone of voice.
Back in 1974, or shortly after the Earth cooled, according to my daughter, I had a really wonderful high school history teacher.
Mr. Tartar was so good that he got high school students to actually sign up for an elective history class.
Back in those days, cable existed only to help you get the local stations.
Mr. Tarter pointed out that the local news had only half an hour to give us all the information we needed to be responsible, informed citizens.
Maybe half that, in fact, after you subtract time for commercials and sports.
And so he asked us, why do they show us footage of a house on fire?
This forever changed the way I saw not only TV news, but all kinds of news media.
A house on fire just isn't news, unless maybe it's your house or a friend's.
Just asking yourself if this story is something you need to know to be an informed citizen is a great filter.
Exaggerated frequency.
Remember that news often means very unusual.
I often say that if you see something horrible like a plane crash covered on the news, it's practically a guarantee that it won't happen to you.
In any kind of entertainment, we are not compelled by the ordinary.
That's why models are freakishly pretty and why burning buildings show up on the news.
The frequency with which a kind of story appears in the media is almost guaranteed to have an inverse relationship with how often it happens in real life.
If you just pay attention to the news, you might think that plane crashes, school shootings, sexual predation, and wars are all on the rise.
The truth is that air travel is incredibly safe and getting safer.
School shootings are vanishingly rare and forcible sexual assaults, in America at least, are on the decline.
And there is less war now than at any time in recorded human history.
What's changed is our ability to get bad news from nearly anywhere on the planet in almost real time.
Emotions.
Any storyteller worth his salt knows that people are compelled by emotions, not data.
News stories are therefore usually selected and presented to get a response from you.
That could mean fear, disgust, outrage, pity, or even delight.
So the first thing to watch for is the emotional reaction you're having.
If you're moved or aroused by a news story, that's the first giant red flag that it's time to call upon the rational, skeptical part of your brain.
A common logical fallacy is argumentum interrorum, the appeal to fear.
When any news story is making you feel afraid, that's an excellent opportunity to stop, step back, and ask yourself why.
Why would they want you to be afraid?
There might be many reasons, such as ideology, tribalism, or just getting a rise out of you so you'll turn the page or stick around through the commercial break.
It's not that there aren't things to be afraid of in the world, but ask yourself, is this really one of them?
Is it really likely to affect you?
Know what every single annoying clickbait headline you've ever read has in common?
Emotional content.
Another Latin phrase comes in handy when asking why questions about news stories?
Why Fear Tricks You 00:03:07
Cui bono.
It means, who benefits?
Take a moment and ask yourself, who wins if you continue to feel this way about the story?
Does it make you more or less likely to vote a certain way?
Support or oppose an issue or candidate?
Buy or avoid a certain product.
False balance.
A very common fallacy is the argument to moderation, which falsely concludes that the compromise between two positions is likely correct.
Presenting both sides of the story appeals to our sense of fairness, but it's not always the right approach.
The fringe likes to try this ploy to gain legitimacy, as creationists often do when opposing evolution.
In reality, evolution is science and creationism isn't.
Or as Stephen Jay Gould said, I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms.
You wouldn't expect much, except for maybe comedy, to come of a debate between a pro-gravity scientist and an anti-gravity advocate.
Giving time to the latter doesn't make the story any more useful or accurate.
If you add cow pie to apple pie, it doesn't make the apple pie better.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finish the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating, skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts.
And Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast, and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
False dilemma.
The other side of that coin is the false dilemma.
Watch Out for False Dilemmas 00:06:29
Which would you rather be, an intelligent consumer of the news or a Cretan who stomps on kittens?
Did you catch the subtle fallacy there?
Choices are often presented which have nothing to do with each other.
Watch out for the false dilemma so you don't get cancer.
Even more common is the argumentum ad hominem, which is attacking the messenger instead of the message.
It's all too easy to get caught up in who is right rather than what is right.
Here's a fun game to play.
Next time you see a story about a corrupt politician, check for where or if the miscreant's political party affiliation is mentioned.
Leaving it out or burying it in the article is a dead giveaway for political bias.
But so is featuring it in the headline or lead paragraph.
Which one's right?
The point is that it's not that simple.
Bias is more subtle than that.
Bias.
You might be telling yourself, all I have to do is find an unbiased news source and it's all good.
Except that, as long as you get your news from human beings, that's just not possible.
As skeptics, we should understand this better than anybody.
Having cherished beliefs, ideologies, and beliefs in irrational things is not a marker for stupidity or dishonesty.
It's a marker for a normally functioning human brain.
The whole point of skepticism is to learn critical thinking skills so that we can counter the errors we know creep into our thinking.
Know what I mean?
The more I learn about confirmation bias, the more I see it everywhere.
The very idea of an unbiased news source is actually a fairly recent marketing ploy.
In the heyday of American newspapers, each publication proudly trumpeted its bias.
Don't believe me?
Just do a web search for American newspapers with the words Democrat or Republican in their names.
While the more responsible outlets today make an effort to separate their editorial bias from straight news, you'd be wise to suspect that the news itself often reflects that same slant.
Editing.
The most powerful tool in storytelling is editing.
Just deciding what's in and what's out completely shapes the story.
It's both essential and unavoidable.
Since a news source can't cover everything that happens everywhere, the choice of what story to run is already a big editorial choice.
Editing, which is always selective, by the way, can distort information in at least two key ways.
One is oversimplification.
Beware the soundbite, especially about nuanced or scientific topics.
Another is plain distortion.
To illustrate my point, I edited Richard Nixon's famous I Am Not a Crook press conference.
And I want to say this to the television audience.
Well, I'm a crook, and in all of my years of public life, I have obstructed justice because people have got to know I've earned everything I've got.
Those are all words he said, just not in that order.
An extreme example, but you get the idea.
Ever seen a TV interview being shot?
I watched David Hartman interview Alvie Ray Smith at Lucasfilm long ago.
During the interview, the camera was on Alvie to get his angle.
After he left, Hartman rewrote his questions to sound smoother, and then they shot his angles.
As a filmmaker, anytime I see video, I ask myself why the camera is running at this particular moment, who is operating the camera, and where they are standing.
What's not on camera can be more important than what's in the frame.
Reward the good guys.
The news about news isn't all bad, and you don't have to be a passive consumer.
There are reporters out there who take their job seriously and make a good effort to get the story right.
When you find one, why not drop them a thank you email?
A little positive feedback can go a long way.
It's always simple to spot the other guy's problems.
In the U.S., it's pretty easy to predict your political affiliation based on which news network, if any, you watch.
That other network is a bunch of liars.
I can see right through their deceit.
People who watch that network are a bunch of morons.
Chances are that you agree with some of that, but about different networks.
So my challenge to you is to see your favorite news source through the other guy's eyes every now and then.
Apply the critical thinking skills you're learning as a skeptic, and don't take anything at face value.
I hope you're listening, Mr. Tartar.
Thanks to you, I've always looked at the news with a skeptical eye.
Make sure you're also getting the weekly Skeptoid companion email.
Otherwise, you're only getting a half dose of the show.
Come to skeptoid.com and click on the members portal to sign up.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Craig Good from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection