All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 15, 2014 - Skeptoid
16:52
Skeptoid #423: 12 Step Programs

Religious-based twelve step programs are no better at stopping addiction than other programs. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Skeptical Eye on 12-Step Programs 00:07:24
Today we're going to point our skeptical eye at 12-step programs, a religious practice intended to stop addictive behavior of almost any kind.
They're very popular and have been around for nearly a century, and many of us just assume that they're among the best treatment programs available.
Does adding the religious element make an addiction program work better?
Or are these programs just substitute addictions themselves?
We're going to find out today on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of HyperFixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
12-step programs.
In 1935, Alcoholics Anonymous was formed by two men struggling for sobriety, Bill Wilson and Bob Smith.
Theirs was a new type of program in that it formalized a series of 12 steps that an alcoholic must follow in order to get sober and stay that way.
The original Alcoholics Anonymous was only the first of many such programs set up to address just about every type of addiction and obsessive behavior you can think of.
Overeaters Anonymous, Marijuana Anonymous, Under-Earners Anonymous, Sexaholics Anonymous, Clutterers Anonymous, Gamblers Anonymous, and even Online Gamers Anonymous.
Today we're going to look a bit into the history of 12-stepping and also how it compares to mainstream psychological treatment of addiction, but mainly into the most important question.
Does it work?
It's impossible to discuss the history of the 12 steps without acknowledging that it is first a religious practice and second a recovery method.
Seven of the 12 steps invoke God.
This is the main thing that separates it from medical or psychological addiction treatments that are primarily targeted at the biochemical and psychological causes of addiction.
So let's get started by reviewing the actual 12 steps.
And these are the steps as published by Alcoholics Anonymous.
1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol, that our lives had become unmanageable.
2. Came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
5. Admitted to God to ourselves and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
6. We're entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed and became willing to make amends to them all.
9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong, promptly admitted it.
11. sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood him, praying only for knowledge of his will for us and the power to carry that out.
12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics and to practice these principles in all our affairs.
Wilson and Smith were both from an evangelical Christian organization called the Oxford Group, and the 12 steps they formalized were reminiscent of practices from the Oxford Group.
It had standards it called the four absolutes, honesty, purity, unselfishness, love, a set of four spiritual practices, and the five C's procedures, confidence, confession, conviction, conversion, and continuance.
Thus, salvation through evangelical Christianity was deeply interwoven with the concept of 12-stepping.
In the words of Bob Wilson, Early AA got its ideas of self-examination, acknowledgement of character defects, restitution for harm done, and working with others straight from the Oxford Group and directly from Reverend Sam Shoemaker, their former religious counsel in America, and from nowhere else.
Because of this, 12-step programs have been strongly criticized, usually by people who dropped out of the programs for one reason or another and became disgruntled.
Some have written books and devoted whole websites to the idea that 12-stepping is just a bait-and-switch program.
Come to stop your addiction, but stay to join our church.
It's the same criticism that's been leveled at Scientology's Narcanon.
It promises to help you get off drugs, but is in reality just a side door into the Church of Scientology.
12-step programs, however, have no central church.
They're nearly always run by Christian groups, but there's no one specific church into which its followers are funneled.
However, at this point in the discussion, we're seeing how an analysis of 12-step programs can so easily become derailed.
To determine the validity of a therapy, we don't only look at its founders and their motivations or beliefs.
We have to look at the data of whether or not the therapy works.
Too often, critics will dismiss 12-stepping as just a religious practice, without even considering the effectiveness of its other goal, to help you stop your addictive behavior.
Significantly, perhaps the most impactful aspect of a 12-step program is a part of it that has nothing to do with the 12 steps, the support group that goes along with it.
12-step programs such as Alcoholics Anonymous meet regularly.
Many of them have daily meetings available, and participants attend as many as they want.
This facet of such programs may play a much more important role than the steps themselves.
To see whether this is the case, let's take a look, for comparison purposes, at the latest and greatest science on addiction recovery, at least according to the United States National Institutes of Health's National Institute on Drug Abuse.
It's complicated, and an effective treatment is likely to be different for every patient.
Because drug abuse and addiction have so many dimensions and disrupt so many aspects of an individual's life, treatment is not simple.
Effective treatment programs typically incorporate many components, each directed to a particular aspect of the illness and its consequences.
Trends in Addiction Recovery Files 00:08:04
Addiction treatment must help the individual stop using drugs, maintain a drug-free lifestyle, and achieve productive functioning in the family, at work, and in society.
Because addiction is typically a chronic disease, people cannot simply stop using drugs for a few days and be cured.
Most patients require long-term or repeated episodes of care to achieve the ultimate goal of sustained abstinence and recovery of their lives.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
The basic approach is usually two-pronged, incorporating both medications and behavioral treatment.
Medications have two basic purposes in the treatment of addiction, in the case of drug addictions.
First, to ease the symptoms of withdrawal, which might otherwise be too intense.
But getting through withdrawal only gets you so far.
The physiological component of a chemical addiction is very real.
Normal brain function is messed up.
Chemical receptors are hungry, producing the cravings that overwhelm many addicts' desire to get sober.
Medications can act on the same targets within the brain as the addiction chemical does, and thus ease the brain away from the addiction and dramatically reduce cravings.
And even after this second phase of medication, true addicts will succeed best with therapy.
This has to be tailored to every individual and usually involves a combination of cognitive behavioral therapy to help patients change the behavior that got them into the drug situation to begin with, family therapy to address the family dysfunction that so often results from addictive behavior, and motivational interviewing and incentives that encourage the patient to want the benefits that come with abstinence from the problematic behavior.
This treatment overview offered by the National Institute on Drug Abuse conflicts sharply with the principles of 12-stepping on one important point.
Frank Buckman, founder of the Oxford Group, said, Only God could change a person, and the work of a life changer had to be done under his direction, which alone could provide the sensitivity and flexibility required.
Proponents of conventional treatment would not be likely to agree.
Obviously, there has to be some responsibility on the addict himself, and it's also crucial to allow other inputs, such as behavioral therapy and medical treatment when needed.
It's neither appropriate nor helpful to say only God and God alone can or should address this problem.
Nevertheless, 12-step programs have a pretty good track record for keeping people off of drugs for a longer time.
How could this be if the basic principle is unscientific?
Well, it appears that 12-step programs may to some degree succeed in spite of themselves.
Why?
Because, religious or not, they do provide an active support group, and support groups are usually, though not universally, found to be associated with better success rates.
This has been studied a lot, but not so much that any overwhelming consensus has emerged.
It's possible to find a study that supports almost any point you might want to make about addiction recovery and about 12-step programs, but there are some trends.
Let's look at some of the most obvious questions to ask.
Do addiction recovery programs work?
Some studies find that addiction recovery programs of every kind work no better than doing nothing.
You can go cold turkey on your own, or you can even continue living with your addiction, and your outcome is likely to be no better than the outcomes of people who enter recovery programs.
But a larger number of studies find that the opposite is true.
People who take active steps to end their addiction will fare better, on average, than those who do nothing about it.
Does group therapy improve outcomes for recovery programs?
Yes.
When people do abstain, their period of abstinence lasts longer with regular group meetings, but they also fare better with one-on-one counseling or with any type of meetings.
The type and size of group makes little difference.
Here's what the National Institute on Drug Abuse has to say.
Most addiction treatment programs encourage patients to participate in self-help group therapy during and after formal treatment.
These groups can be particularly helpful during recovery, offering an added layer of community-level social support to help people achieve and maintain abstinence and other healthy lifestyle behaviors over the course of a lifetime.
Do 12-step programs have better outcomes than other group therapies?
No.
Although plenty of studies disagree, the majority seem to find that it's the regular meeting process itself that makes the difference, not what happens at the meetings or whether they are 12-step.
Interestingly, a small number of groups can be counterproductive and lead to earlier relapse.
Do 12-step participants who are already religious fare better?
Yes, they do.
Secular people are significantly less likely to stick with a 12-step program than they are with a non-religious program, and vice versa.
This is right in line with what seems self-evident.
People are more likely to stick with a program that affirms their existing beliefs or is in line with their existing interests.
So even though there are a lot of studies with a high noise level from the past half century, we can still form a pretty good answer to the question of whether 12-step programs work.
If you have an addiction, then you're probably better off seeking a treatment program than you are doing nothing.
You're probably better off starting with a full medical intervention.
And from there, the road forks.
If you're an evangelical Christian, your best chance at recovery is to enter a 12-step program.
And if you're not an evangelical Christian, then your best chance is to go with a community support program that is not a 12-stepper.
The Road Forks After Medicine 00:01:19
You're listening to Skeptoid, a non-profit listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as five US dollars per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection