All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 1, 2014 - Skeptoid
17:04
Skeptoid #421: Student Questions: Internet Tracking and Plasma Cosmology

Skeptoid answers another round of questions sent in by students all around the world. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Student Questions on Weird Diets 00:07:05
What good is a podcast that deconstructs urban legends if we only talk about some random one each week that you may or may not have even heard of?
Well, to help mitigate that, we take student questions.
Students can send us questions about something they heard, and we'll give them the full skeptoid treatment right here.
So, let's jump into another round, and we've got five of them for you today.
That's coming up next on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems, and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Student questions, Internet Tracking and Plasma Cosmology.
Once again, we're going to answer some questions sent in by students all around the world.
Are you skeptical about something in pop culture?
I'll do my best to give you a quick and accurate answer.
Today's questions pertain to HCG dietary supplements, the value of web browser extensions that block cookies and browsing history, the value of ear candling and antibacterial cleansers, and a freaky idea called plasma cosmology.
Let's get started with...
Hello, Brian.
This is Brad from Georgia State University in Atlanta, Georgia.
My question is about HCG drops.
They appear to be a new diet fad.
I have a friend who lost about 60 pounds using the drops and managed to keep the weight off for about a year and a half.
The diet she was on was 500 to 1,000 calories a day while using the drops throughout the day.
Anyone on a restrictive diet of 500 calories a day would lose weight without supplements like HCG.
Just wondering, is there any scientific basis for the HCD drops?
And do they actually do anything at all?
Thanks, love the show.
Hi, Brad, and you pretty much answered your own question.
If you limit yourself to 500 or 1,000 calories per day, you're going to lose weight, whether you want to or not, and whether you take any sort of supplement or not.
Also, that's far too restrictive a number and is definitely not healthy.
Nobody should restrict themselves this much without a doctor's supervision.
But let's talk about the HCG.
HCG is human chorionic gonadotropin, a hormone released by the placenta during pregnancy.
We measure its level for screening of pregnancies or possible birth defects and other potential problems.
At some point, someone decided to market it as a dietary product.
The only possible connection I've been able to find is that women tend to lose weight after giving birth.
So someone figured out a way to leverage that into a fad diet.
In fact, HCG plays no role in losing weight after birth.
A woman's body stops producing it once she's no longer pregnant.
The real key here is that you mentioned your friend took drops.
I guarantee you will find these are homeopathic preparations, which, by definition, means that they do not contain a single molecule of HCG, only its, quote, spiritual essence, to use the homeopathic terminology.
See the full Skeptoid episode on homeopathy if you want to learn more about that.
Even if the drops did contain some HCG, there's no medical reason why they might impact weight loss.
The basic weight loss advice.
Avoid all diet fads, especially those you have to pay for.
Simply eat better, eat less, and exercise.
Hi, Brian.
I'm Colin, a recent graduate from the College of Worcester, and I was wondering if internet extensions that block companies from tracking you really work and what your opinion is on that.
Thank you very much.
Bye.
A few years ago, I would have told you such extensions are a waste of your time.
The basic structure of the internet hasn't changed.
Cookies don't do anything but store information limited to what a website server is able to know about you, which isn't very much.
Websites can't access cookies stored on your computer written by other websites, and no website can access your browsing history or your computer's contacts or other documents at all.
Ever, period.
These are fundamental security characteristics built into the nature of internet protocols.
But things have evolved a lot.
These days, virtually every website has widgets from Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, Google Ads, and dozens of other advertising companies.
Every time you visit such a page, your browser makes a call to those companies to get their widget or their ad.
And now, Facebook or the others know that you just visited that page.
Cookies have become virtually irrelevant, since the companies that track you generally have direct access to you virtually everywhere you go.
Roads exist because we pay road taxes, and the free useful internet sites we all enjoy exist because we unknowingly allow these companies to learn about us so they can market targeted products to us.
You can install such blockers, like Disconnect, Ghostery, or AdBlock Plus, and they will generally work well.
Companies will no longer know about your browsing habits.
They will receive less value from having you as a visitor.
The advertisements you see won't be relevant to your interests, and you'll lose some level of convenience.
That's basically the proposition.
But a word to the wise.
Some of these tracking blockers will themselves track you, which is why they're free.
Be very careful when you configure them and check their settings.
These tracking blocking extensions shouldn't be confused with browser settings that block third-party cookies or delete your browsing history.
There's not really any longer a super compelling justification for doing this, unless you're worried about an expert gaining physical access to your computer to see what websites you've been visiting.
Cookies and your locally stored internet history are parts of the legitimate internet infrastructure and are both helpful and convenient when used properly.
Truth About Ear Candles and Soap 00:05:09
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Hi, Brian.
This is David from Sydney, Australia.
I've got a friend who works in the mines, and he swears by the use of ear candles as a way of clearing out his ears.
I'm not so sure about them.
Can you look into this for me?
Ear candling is an alternative medicine technique for removing earwax.
It involves laying on your side, placing a thin hollow candle in your ear, and lighting it, letting it burn almost all the way down.
The claim is that the heat inside the candle creates a negative pressure inside the ear, which somehow vacuums out your earwax.
The usual supporting evidence offered is that when you cut open the remaining part of the candle, you can see orange residue inside.
Thus, it must be working.
But everything is wrong with this.
First, one researcher burned a pair of control candles by themselves without putting them in an ear and found they contained the same orange residue.
This is because the residue found inside used ear candles is from the candles themselves, not from your ear.
Second, candle heat can potentially create a weak convection current, but that's not a vacuum.
Hold a burning ear candle near any sort of debris, like dust on a desk or salt on your countertop, and you'll see that nothing is moved at all.
Ear candles have no physical potential to perform their only advertised function.
Third, they're quite dangerous.
Injuries from hot wax dripping into the ear canal are frequent.
Equally common are burns suffered by people trying to hold their own ear candles.
Finally, your ear secretes wax for a reason.
It guards against infections in the ear canal and removes dirt and other contaminants as it naturally flows outward.
If for some reason you ever do get a problematic blockage of ear wax, it can be easily and safely removed with a bulb syringe or eardrops.
There's never any reason to perform ear candling, which is proven to be both dangerous and useless.
Hello Brian, my name is Gary Froon.
I'm 31 and studying science with the Oakland University.
I've seen a few articles posted on Facebook from pages that I trust warning about the dangers of these antibacterial hand washes that everyone has nowadays in their bathrooms, kitchens and so on, even urging people to stop buying them.
I can't seem to find the time to look into it myself, but as I always have time for skeptoid, I was wondering if you could help me out.
Thanks.
Gary, you're right on with this one.
There are two basic types of antibacterial cleansers.
Those that contain biocides like triclosan, the most common, and those that contain alcohol.
Both are effective at killing germs on contact, and both are about as effective at removing germs from your hands as a quick wash with soap and water.
The difference is that alcohol evaporates leaving no residue, and triclosan doesn't.
This results in the creation of a triclosan-contaminated environment on your hands, in which it's possible for triclosan-resistant germs to reproduce.
Although this has been given a lot of press and is generally true, the downsides of using triclosan are probably overblown.
A whole variety of possible side effects has been raised in the media, like endocrine disruption, allergies, and environmental contamination.
Debunking Plasma Cosology Theories 00:04:46
But these are also exaggerated, more often than not.
Nevertheless, there's no compelling reason to choose triclosan cleaners over the equally effective alcohol-based cleaners, which lack any of the risks.
And to go a step farther, there's also no reason other than convenience to choose either over simply washing your hands.
Hello, Brian.
I'm Evan from the University of Applied Sciences Technikum Fiona, and I was wondering, is plasma cosmology a valid alternative to cosmology or pseudoscience?
Plasma cosmology is the name for an alternative model for the universe.
In very broad strokes, it proposes that electromagnetic forces in astronomical objects play not just the relatively important role that they actually do play, but that they also account for all the other astronomical structure that we now know are attributed to gravity and relativity.
It's complicated, and that's not a very complete or very accurate description, but suffice it to say that plasma cosmology discards virtually every major astronomical discovery and theory of the past 50 years.
Unlike most crank alternative models, this one was actually proposed by a trio of real theoretical physicists.
But they did so in the 1960s, before much of modern astronomy was known.
For example, we now know that some of the observations the originators of plasma cosmology were trying to explain are the result of things like dark matter, dark energy, and inflation, concepts that were not yet proven back in those days.
But even in those early days, plasma cosmology failed as a theory in too many other ways and was never taken very seriously.
Today, with our much more complete knowledge, it's completely unnecessary.
It violates too much of what we know and it fails to explain anything that's not already explained by proven phenomena.
A lot of its themes are nothing more than strawman arguments against the standard model, such as untrue claims that scientists refuse to acknowledge electromagnetism.
But like every fringe theory, even those that have been disproven, plasma cosmology continues to have its supporters, almost all of whom today come from outside of astronomy.
It's comparable to ideas like geocentrism or the hollow earth theory.
Always remember that it's easy to fool lay people with scientific sounding jargon.
But there are very good reasons why astronomers abandoned this particular idea decades ago.
Students, keep those questions coming.
It's easy to record and send a question if you have a smartphone.
Just come to skeptoid.com and click on student questions.
Until next time, stay away from the ear candles.
Sustainability is always an important theme in science.
I work full-time bringing you Skeptoid every week on schedule, but it's not quite sustainable.
I need your support.
If you enjoy the show, please come to skeptoid.com and click on support skeptoid and see how easy it is to make your monthly tax-deductible micropayments keep Skeptoid viable for many years to come.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection