All Episodes Plain Text
Dec. 31, 2013 - Skeptoid
16:26
Skeptoid #395: Student Questions: Food Woo, Food Woo, and More Food Woo

Skeptoid answers questions sent in by students, all of them this week pertaining to popular food pseudoscience. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Debunking Food Myths 00:02:00
Hardly any of us ever makes it through a day without getting exposed to some random new pop culture belief or fad.
And many of them involve strange ideas about food.
Maybe it's a new miracle food or an old mainstay ingredient that suddenly everyone claims is toxic.
Today we're going to hear from six students who wrote in with their questions about food myths.
That's today on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and we'll replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Student Questions.
Food Woo, Food Woo, and More Food Woo.
There was nothing else I could call this episode.
Every so often I answer questions sent in by students around the world.
And this time, every single question has to do with a pseudoscientific food claim.
Food woo is everywhere, and student demographics are heavily targeted by marketers.
The MSG Myth Explained 00:11:54
There's hardly a young person anywhere who hasn't been bombarded by warnings ranging from, this food will kill you, all the way to, this food is a miracle cure, and everything in between.
All of today's student questions can be answered with a single concept.
Every food can be part of a healthy diet or part of an unhealthy diet.
And there's no such thing as a miracle food.
Let's keep that in mind as we hear from our students.
Hi, I'm Chris from Sydney, Australia.
I'd like to know the truth about the health effects of MSG.
MSG, or monosodium glutamate, is a flavoring agent originally developed from seaweed.
As with so many other compounds, mountainous anecdotal evidence exists that certain people are sensitive to it or develop some reaction to food with MSG added.
But there's a problem.
MSG is a glutamic acid, as its name suggests, and glutamic acids are widespread in many foods, including virtually everything that contains protein.
The supposed condition, called Chinese restaurant syndrome, or MSG symptom complex, exists only from self-diagnosis reports and has never been medically described.
Reported symptoms vary, but often include numbness or a jittery feeling.
But just because MSG is common and just about everyone gets some in just about every meal, doesn't mean that a big dose of it, like a big spoonful mixed into your teriyaki sauce, won't cause a reaction in people who are susceptible.
This has been tested a number of times in large, well-controlled, randomized trials.
The result?
Even people who self-identify as MSG sensitive no longer have consistent reactions when given food that they don't know whether or not it contains MSG.
And numerous studies have conclusively found that MSG produces no long-term effects in anybody.
This is one of those conclusions that's hard to swallow because so many of us take MSG syndrome as a given.
But the science shows that it simply doesn't exist.
Hi, Brian.
My name is Gino, and I'm a graduate student in communications from USC.
My question is about homogenization of milk.
I have a friend who refuses to drink anything but whole natural milk because she claims the homogenization process breaks down the fats and the milk so much that the fats metabolize quicker and end up sticking in their fat cells.
She also thinks that aerosolized fats contribute to cholesterol buildup in our veins and arteries.
After a bit of research, some of what she claims is true, but I'd like to get your take on it.
Thanks.
Yet another food demonized as secretly poisonous.
I've done a full episode on milk myths, mostly centering on the claims that unpasteurized milk is a miracle food, and the alleged evils of homogenization were well covered.
Yes, homogenization does break up the large chunks of fat into smaller pieces, giving it a uniform consistency.
But this is not a chemical difference.
It's just finer chunks in the mix.
The taste is different, just as eating a fried egg is different from eating a scrambled egg.
You're still eating the same egg.
You're still drinking the same milk.
And there's plenty of proof that homogenized milk does not result in any increased cholesterol problems or weight gain.
It's something that consumers have been calling for for a long time, and so lots of testing has been done.
Check studies published in the Journal of Food Protection or the Journal of Dairy Research and see the references on the full skeptoid episode if you want to get all the data.
Don't worry about it.
It's nothing more than a personal taste preference.
Hey, Brian, this is Daniel.
I'm a student at Grand Valley State University living in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
I've finally gotten back into weightlifting in the past four months and I've been getting a lot of recommendations for all sorts of pre-workout supplements and post-workout shakes.
Have any of these ingredients like, and I'm reading them from an ingredient list of one recommended product called C4 Extreme, beta-alanine, creatine nitrate, argonine AKKG, or caffeine have been shown to have any substantial or at least noticeable effects?
And what about the vehement claims from other friends who say that whey protein isolate works better than just plain whey protein?
Is there anything to that to justify the absurd price difference?
Thanks a bunch.
Let's refer back to one of our starting theorems.
There's no such thing as a miracle food.
If you're weightlifting and want to build muscle, you need a lot of food.
A lot of calories, a lot of proteins, a lot of everything your body uses to build itself.
The idea that there's one supplement or one protein type, or even a combination of several that will build your muscles faster is wrong.
The biochemistry of your muscles is much more complicated than that.
Your blood is your body's supply train.
If you've worked out your muscles and they need raw materials to rebuild damaged fibers, the blood supplies those.
When your blood becomes depleted of something, it gets it from your body's various stores, like your fat, your bone marrow, your lungs, your digestive system, whatever it needs to maintain its balanced supply inventory.
There's no direct line to supercharge your muscles with protein.
The body simply doesn't work that way.
If you're trying to build muscle by weightlifting, adding a bodybuilding supplement to your regular diet is probably better than adding nothing.
But simply eating a whole lot of properly balanced meals is better still.
Give your blood access to everything it needs, not just to one or two specific brands of miracle protein or amino acid.
and don't skimp on the water, the single most important nutrient.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together, get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Hi, bro.
My name's Johnny from Lincoln, England.
After studies, I go to the gym in the evening, and I've been told that the body can only absorb or use 20 grams of protein at any one time.
I've never been able to find evidence for this.
Is it true?
This is another really popular subject in bodybuilding circles.
Everyone wants to maximize their body's available protein, but nobody wants to buy and eat more special protein powder than their body's going to use.
Well, the 20 gram number is always going to be wrong, simply because everyone's a different size with a different amount of lean mass and different requirements based on all sorts of things.
In addition, your digestive system is relatively slow, and this is for a good reason.
A long, slow digestive tract smooths out the spikes of incoming nutrients from meals.
Surprisingly, ignoring the effects of hunger and looking at it from a long-term perspective, most studies indicate no difference between people who eat one big meal a day and those who eat the same food spread out over a number of smaller meals and snacks.
The recommended daily allowance for protein is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight, but active bodybuilders or hard workers like lumberjacks may want to more than triple that to about 3 grams per kilogram.
Despite concerns from some about damaging your kidneys through overwork, too much protein is not going to hurt you, regardless of whether you spread it out over a day or suck it down all at once in a giant protein shake.
Hi, Brian.
This is Will, history and politics student at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.
My mother always told me to avoid dairy products when I have a cold as they increase congestion.
Is this true or just an urbanemy?
Would that there were a single food that could affect the outcome of a viral infection, but even in this popular folk wisdom instance, it's not the case.
Perhaps the best study of this belief was done in 1990 with 60 people who volunteered to be given a cold virus.
Researchers collected and weighed each subject's mucus output every day to see how much they were producing.
Half drank a lot of milk each day.
Half didn't.
It turned out that the milk drinkers did not produce any more mucus than normal, thus conclusively busting the myth.
However, subjects also reported subjectively on the severity of their coffin congestion.
Those who stated they believed that milk would make congestion worse were also the same people who felt they suffered the most from coffin congestion.
But there turned out to be no significant correlation between them and the subjects who produced more mucus.
So like so many phenomena, this particular snippet of folk wisdom also comes down to belief.
Hello, I'm Daniel from Glasgow in the UK.
So the other day my girlfriend told me that a friend of hers has been trying to become pregnant, but that so far she's been unable to conceive on account of the fact that she regularly consumes soy milk.
Can you tell me whether there's any truth to this suggestion that soy products can adversely affect a woman's fertility?
Thank you.
And again, one more case where adding or eliminating a single food is thought to produce radical change in the body.
And this one comes armed with supporting studies and whole battalions of alternative health websites promoting it.
Notably, one study gave rats massive doses of isoflavones, a compound found in soy that mimics estrogen.
Some developed irregular menstrual cycles, and many publications have attempted to extrapolate that into reduced fertility in humans who consume real-world amounts of isoflavones.
Thus was born yet another food woo urban legend.
But reviews of all studies, rather than just a cherry-picked few, have found no reduction in fertility from consuming soy, nor any harm to babies who drink soy formula.
No good research has ever found a reliable link between consuming soy and either fertility problems, menstrual cycle irregularity, breast cancer, or any other problems associated with estrogen and other hormones.
This doesn't mean hopeful mothers should rush out and consume all the soy they can find, but it also doesn't mean they should worry about avoiding it.
Why Skepticism Matters 00:02:27
Overall, the default reaction to all food woo that you hear should be extreme skepticism.
At any given dinner party, at least half the people at the table will harbor a pet food woo belief, whose source can probably be traced to a random claim on the internet or a mass market paperback.
Their pet beliefs are probably all different, yet if you look around the table, just about everyone will appear to be just about as generally healthy as everyone else.
Any astounding factoid making an unlikely claim that should result in half the world's population being at death's door should raise a red flag.
Whenever you hear any claim that looks, sounds, and quacks like food woo, you should always be skeptical.
Like every weekly program, Skeptoid takes time and money to produce.
Skeptoid Media is funded entirely by listeners.
Come to skeptoid.com and spend 30 seconds setting up your automatic recurring micropayments.
And that's what it takes to make the show possible.
Please join me today.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection