All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 16, 2013 - Skeptoid
17:04
Skeptoid #371: The Vanishing Village of Angikuni Lake

The legend of the disappearing Eskimo village of Angikuni Lake turns out to be simple pulp fiction. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Vanishing Inuit Village 00:07:30
It's not uncommon for a traveler, or even a group, to go missing in a very remote part of the world.
But when there's an established village or town which doesn't go anywhere, it doesn't seem very likely that it should go missing.
But apparently, that's exactly what happened.
At least, according to this old urban legend that gets passed around on the internet.
The vanishing village of Anjacuni Lake is today on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
The Vanishing Village of Anjacuni Lake.
The year was 1930, the frozen wastes of northern Canada.
It was November, late fall, and the flat landscape was blasted over with ice crystals and wind.
A lone trapper, Joe LaBelle, made his way to an Inuit village he knew.
All looked well as he approached, but when he arrived, nobody answered his greeting calls.
LaBelle looked around and found everything in place, everything, except the people.
The entire population of the village had vanished.
Food, clothing, rifles, half-cooked meals, and everything else needed for life on the tundra were all at the ready, but no Inuit to use them.
LaBelle stood on the shore of Anjacuni Lake and pondered the mystery, then went straight away and reported the disappearance to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
Since then, the story of Anjacuni Lake has been a mainstay of Canadian mystery lore.
You'd hardly recognize Anjacuni Lake as a lake.
Nunavut is the largest and northernmost of Canada's territories and is one of the most sparsely populated regions on Earth.
There are more than 50 square kilometers of barren rock and ice per person in Nunavut, half the density of Greenland, and most of them speak Inuktitut.
There's only one major settlement within the whole of this vast territory, the capital Ikluit, with less than 7,000 population, 1,500 kilometers east of Anjacuni Lake.
Nunavut encloses most of the Canadian Arctic archipelago, and its mainland portion is almost completely devoid of any features at all, having been scraped flat by glaciers that left only barren rock and tundra laced with shallow puddles and streams, generously called lakes and rivers.
A few dozen of these puddles, loosely linked together, are what comprise Anjacuni Lake.
During most of the year, it's an unbroken flat plain of ice and snow, completely indistinct from anything within 500 kilometers in any direction.
They call this part of Canada the Barren Grounds.
The most famous published account of Joe LaBelle's mysterious encounter comes from Frank Edwards' 1959 book, Stranger Than Science, in which Edwards devoted three short pages to the story.
He tells how the mounted police returned to the village site with LaBelle and confirmed everything he told them.
And, like LaBelle, they were unable to find any trace of the villagers, nor come up with any suggestion why they might have left all of their valuables and necessities behind.
Their kayaks still sat on the beach, meals still hung over long-dead cooking fires.
The police also found the frozen bodies of the villagers' dogs.
Edwards' chapter concludes, Months of patient and far-flung investigation failed to produce a single trace of any member who had lived in the deserted village of Anjacuni.
The mounted police filed it as unsolved, and so it remains.
There are a number of things about the Joe LaBelle story that raise red flags.
For one thing, it happened in November, when the average temperatures are 13 degrees Celsius below freezing.
Anjacuni Lake is a sheet of ice.
Kayaks pulled up on the beach would not be battered by wave action.
The very presence of kayaks so far inland is suspect, though not impossible.
Migratory Inuit would often portage their kayaks to hunt caribou.
These eastern Iglulik kayaks were made of seal skin stretched over willow branches.
But the small Anjacuni Lake is landlocked so far inland on the barrens that neither willow nor seal skin were available, and this would be by far the furthest inland that the historical use of Iglulik kayaks would have ever been documented.
Not impossible, but highly suspect.
Edwards also had LaBelle describing a permanent settlement, a friendly little Eskimo village of about 30 inhabitants, that he'd known, quote, for many years.
A statement from the Mounted Police says, a village with such a large population would not have existed in such a remote area of the Northwest Territories.
They had left sealskin garments behind, in a region where there was caribou hide rather than seal skin, and as a trapper, LaBelle should have been able to identify it properly.
So there was either a series of quite improbable circumstances, or LaBelle was wrong, or Edwards was wrong.
Today, no physical evidence exists of a village at Anjacuni Lake, and nobody has ever published an account of going up there and clearing away any remnants.
So we have to rely on documentary evidence to find the true history of the vanishing village.
Interestingly, following the history of the published accounts is a bit like trying to follow one of those movies that's out of sequence and jumps around from different time periods, and you'll see what I mean.
The earliest recorded publication about Anjacuni Lake is a 1976 citation of an article from November 29, 1930, written by an Emmet E. Kelleher in the Halifax Herald newspaper.
Kelleher, writing as a special correspondent for the paper, told LaBelle's story and gave the village a population of 25, and offered a more reserved version of the artifacts LaBelle found, including a single rusty old rifle and a few dog corpses.
The article included a generic photograph of an Inuit village.
Next, on January 17th of 1931, Cortland Starnes, the commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, released an investigation of the event undertaken by a Sergeant J. Nelson.
Nelson, in speaking with local traders, learned that Joe Labelle was a real person but worked only in northern Manitoba.
He also discovered that Kelleher's photograph was an old one from the RCMP's own archives, and as nobody in the region had heard of this village or its disappearance, Nelson concluded the entire episode was a sensationalized hoax made up by Kelleher.
For the next 28 years, it appears that the presses were quiet.
Fabricated RCMP Reports 00:07:19
I was able to find no printed works at all of any kind that mentioned Anjocuni Lake or any of the names involved until 1959, when Frank Edwards' book was released.
Edwards slightly increased the number of Inuit from 25 to 30.
Edwards offered no sources for his chapter and did not mention the alleged 1930 or 1931 releases.
Over the next 17 years, the presses were almost as quiet.
A few scattered references to Edwards' version of the story appeared in books about psychics and the paranormal, but no new details were introduced.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
It was 1976 when the story really broke.
Dwight Whalen wrote a cover story for the November 1976 issue of Fate magazine called Vanished Village Revisited.
Whelan was the first to note the 1930 and 1931 articles.
There does not seem to be any record of any earlier author finding them.
Whelan also wrote that when he called the RCMP personally, he was told they had no record of any such event, despite the many details in Sergeant Nelson's report, provided by the RCMP commissioner himself.
Whelan concluded that the whole story was largely invented by Emmett Kelleher, possibly based on a tall tale he heard from Joe Labelle, who may or may not have stumbled on some actual ruins of a village or camp.
And then things got weird.
In the April 1977 edition of Fate, a reader wrote in to dispute Whelan's conclusion.
This reader was none other than Betty Hill, at the time the most famous self-described alien abductee in the world, and subject to the 1966 book The Interrupted Journey, Two Lost Hours Aboard a Flying Saucer.
Betty claimed that while on a ferry ride with her husband Barney at the Bay of Fundy, they met a Captain Larson who, as a mountie, had spent nine years investigating the mystery of the vanishing village at Anjacuni Lake.
In his opinion, wrote Betty, the villagers had all been abducted by UFOs.
From this point on, UFO writers everywhere began including Anjacuni Lake in their books.
The 1983 book The World's Great UFO Mysteries by Nigel Blundell and Roger Bohr amplified the population of the village to 1,200 and added the element of three trappers, Armand Laurent and his two sons seeing UFOs flying toward Anjacouni.
They then encountered a group of mounties on their way to investigate the flying objects.
In this version of the story, Joe LaBelle used a telegraph to report the vanished village, despite there being no telegraphs within probably a thousand kilometers of the lake.
In 1988, John Colombo's book, Mysterious Canada, repeated all of this, including Blundell and Bohr's overblown details and all of Whelan's correspondence with the RCMP.
People magazine ran a 1988 article essentially repeating all of this sensationalized new information.
The Canadian UFO report published in 2006 by Rutkowski and Dittman added all the villagers' ancestral graves having been emptied.
And a Rince.com article in 2001 increased the village population to 2,000 and buried the dog corpses under 12 feet of snow.
What is a fact-hunting researcher to do?
Going back to the original sources is sometimes easier said than done.
Whelan gave precise details of the publication of the 1930 newspaper article and the 1931 RCMP report.
And, according to researcher Patrick Dirksen who worked with the staff at the Millennium Library in Winnipeg in 2013, neither appears to exist.
They also searched all other Manitoba newspapers from the day and found no references to the story whatsoever, nor any record of an Emmett E. Kelleher.
Certainly nothing like it appears in the microfilm copies I have on my desk right now.
In 1988, the Australian skeptics contacted the RCMP historian S.W. Horrell, who wrote, Many years ago, the members of RCMP, then retired, who had served in the area at the time these events were purported to have happened, 1930, and were asked for their comments on the story.
They could not confirm it, recalled nothing like it, and were astounded that such a ridiculous tale could be believed.
Our files were carefully searched.
No strange craft was ever reported.
No one named Joe LaBelle ever came to the RCMP in panic about Lake Anjacuni.
The RCMP did not send out any search parties.
The only records we have on the story are copies of letters to correspondents like yourself informing the writers that the story is entirely fictitious.
It seems clear that Frank Edwards' 1959 chapter is indeed the genesis of the tale, apparently made up from whole cloth.
It also seems clear that Dwight Whelan, writing in 1976, some 45 years after the event, took advantage of the fact that no one who would have been involved was still living and invented both the 1930 newspaper article and the 1931 RCMP report.
Skeptoid's Listener Support 00:02:11
If I'm wrong about this, I warmly invite proof to the contrary.
These fabricated reports provided the seeds of a story that motivated UFO writers for decades to come.
Could Frank Edwards have ever imagined how his little campfire tale of a lonely trapper finding a mysteriously abandoned village would have grown?
It grew largely due to citations of fake newspaper articles.
Back in the 50s and even the 70s, the state of archiving technology might have made it possible for unscrupulous writers to get away with that.
Today, they still can, but only when their readers accept secondary and tertiary sources without scrutiny, which is, unfortunately, the case all too often.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com Hello everyone, this is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection