All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 17, 2012 - Skeptoid
15:03
Skeptoid #319: Student Questions: Food Woo and Iron Man at the Airport

Skeptoid answers another round of questions sent in by students all around the world. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Iron Man Metal Detector Myth 00:06:19
You know those metal detectors at the airport?
I guess if you tried to carry a piece of iron through them, it'd set them off and you wouldn't get through.
Well, what about the iron in your blood?
Shouldn't that set them off too?
Because according to one urban legend anyway, it's happened at least once to a guy with too much iron in his blood.
We're going to answer this and other questions sent in by students today.
Student questions are up next on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of HyperFixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's Hyperfixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Student Questions, Food Woo, and Iron Man at the Airport.
Wherever I go, speaking to student audiences, food woo continues to be the most prevalent theme that I run into.
By food woo, I mean pseudo-scientific beliefs about food.
Some food is incredibly bad for you, but nobody has noticed yet.
Or some food incredibly brings miraculous health, but the industry covers it up.
So we're going to start this round of student questions with a few such beliefs.
They all follow the same basic theme.
Will this particular food, diet, or eating habit bring incredible health or incredible detriment?
Like I've heard on the internet.
Sometimes claims that sound astonishing are true, but more often than not, they're just urban legends.
Here's a perfect example to start with, an eating habit that your mother probably always warned you about.
Hi, Brian.
My name is Chris and I'm a PhD student at the University of New England in New South Wales, Australia.
I rarely eat breakfast until mid-morning, but people around me often tell me breakfast is the most important meal of the day, and otherwise suggest that I'm sabotaging my own potential by not having a large breakfast.
I have found conflicting reports online with few satisfactory sources on the subject.
Can you find me a science-based answer to this issue?
Thanks.
One of the reasons there are no miracle weight loss products on the market that actually work is that the mechanisms governing your body's hunger cravings are really, really complicated and still not even fully understood.
These mechanisms probably also differ from person to person, but there is still a lot that we do know.
For one thing, the connection between your stomach and your muscles is not direct.
It's not like you eat something and then immediately use the energy from that food.
Your muscles are kept supplied by your blood, and your blood is kept supplied by a number of storage systems and regulated by different systems as well.
However, every so often your brain tells you that it's time to eat, and it might hit you with any number of biochemical signals that make you feel weak or tired or hungry.
It's a complicated system, but as long as you get enough food in you every day, it's going to continue to work fine.
How you feel throughout that day is another matter.
Some people get those signals from the brain, those hunger cravings or periods of weakness or lightheadedness, sooner or more often than other people.
Some people avoid them best by eating throughout the day, and some people don't really get them at all and are fine with eating a single big meal.
It's really an individual thing.
Short answer.
If you don't feel you need breakfast, there's no reason for you to eat it, so long as you get those calories eventually at some point in the day.
Hi, Brian.
I'm from the University of Florida, and my question is about the medical benefits of papaya.
A friend of mine who is from China recently told me that Chinese women think papaya will make their breasts grow bigger.
So they eat papaya to make that happen.
Is that at all factually based?
And if not, do you know why it is so prevalent in Chinese culture?
Thanks.
If true, papaya would be the most in-demand product of all time.
It isn't, which should suggest that not much proper investigation has found any merit to this belief.
Breast size, like most aspects of the human body, is determined by genetics.
Most women's breasts will enlarge if they put on weight, and papayas are high in sugar and calories and are a great way to put on weight.
So they're a fine way to grow your breasts, but only if you also want to grow the rest of yourself at the same time.
Hello, Brian Diane.
This is James.
I have been a student at Fox Valley Technical College, working to a degenerative support specialist.
I was wondering if natural sugar is so much better for you than artificial sugar, meaning apples, oranges, and other stuff, and artificial sugar, meaning candy, ice cream, and soda.
Is this true or not?
James, a molecule is a molecule.
Sugar is sucrose, a disaccharide of glucose and fructose.
That molecule is absolutely identical, down to the last quark, whether it came from sugar cane or from anywhere else, and whether it's found in an apple or it's found in ice cream.
But what people really mean when they say artificial sugar is high-fructose corn syrup, which we've discussed in depth on a previous Skeptoid episode.
HFCS consists of those same two monosaccharides, glucose and fructose, yet they're not chemically bound together.
So it's still a sugar, but it allows the food companies the ability to alter the proportion between glucose and fructose in order to tweak the sweetness up or down.
When you eat sugar, the first thing your digestive system does is to break that bond.
So whether you eat sugar or HFCS makes no difference once it's in your body.
The media loves to report research showing some difference in the way your body metabolizes the two, as if alarm bells are ringing and telling us that HFCS is more harmful.
HFCS Metabolism Misconceptions Explained 00:07:08
But the overwhelming majority of research shows there is no significant difference to your body, just as basic chemistry predicts.
The best advice is to avoid both of them, because any added sweetener is just extra calories that your body doesn't need and will just make you fat.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together, get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Okay, enough with the food woo.
Let's move on to some other subject areas, beginning with brain training video games, also making incredible sounding claims.
Hi, Brian.
This is Julian, student at University of Hildesheim, Germany, and I'd like to know, what is the real effectiveness of those brain training programs you can get on the internet or on gaming consoles?
Some companies claim to be working with neuroscientists and to base their work on actual scientific findings, but I wonder, can you really enhance your memory and concentration just by playing a couple of simple games?
We have a pretty definitive answer for this one at the present time.
No.
The good doctors and neurologists over at the science-based medicine blog talk about this subject pretty often, and they've ably summarized the best research to date.
No one study gives a conclusive answer, of course, but among the largest and best of these placed almost 5,000 subjects into three groups, including a control, and their skills were tested after six weeks of using brain training games intended to improve reasoning, planning, problem solving, memory, attention, visual-spatial processing, and math.
The result?
There is no statistically significant difference between the groups who played the games and the control subjects who did not.
Save your money unless and until the data supports the vendor's claims.
Hey, Brian, I'm Will and I live in Doha Qatar.
I recently heard a claim that there are plants in the Amazon rainforest that can cure cancer.
Is this true to any extent?
Thanks.
Yes and no.
No, there has never been any good evidence that a single cure for any or all cancers has ever been found in any particular plant or compound, the way it's depicted in Hollywood, as when Sean Connery's character found one in Medicine Man.
But yes, there are undoubtedly many more useful drugs still to be found in the wild.
What many people don't realize is that compounds found in nature, from the jungle, the ocean, and everywhere else, have always been and continue to be the main source for most of our pharmaceutical discoveries.
Some people like to think there is an us-against them mentality where the products of big pharmaceutical companies compete against nature's herbs.
In fact, they are one and the same thing.
Every pharmaceutical company in the world has researchers everywhere searching and testing and studying nature, just like Sean Connery's character, and hoping to find the next discovery.
Cancers represent such a huge and diverse category of diseases that it's very unlikely any one compound will treat all of them, Amazon rainforest or not.
But that's not going to stop the molecular biologists from pointing their microscopes at the jungle.
Hi, Brian.
My name is Niklas Westerberg, and I'm a medical student at the University of Oslo in Norway.
In a recent lecture on hemochromatosis, we were told about this person being stopped at an airport in the security control because he had so much iron in his body.
To me, this sounds like an urban legend.
Could this really be true?
This is very unlikely.
Most of these stories seem to reference an old medical case where a guy nicknamed the Iron Man supposedly set off a metal detector and couldn't get on a plane.
But as far as finding well-sourced modern cases where specific names and dates are given, I came up empty.
Nevertheless, this story is repeated on many web pages and throughout the literature.
Hemochromatosis is a real medical condition, usually inherited, but it can also be acquired.
As many as one in nine men in Northern Europe, where it's most common, have this gene.
The condition is usually detected sometime in middle age when the iron levels have built up high enough to start causing problems.
The worst cases can have 10 times the normal amount of iron in their bodies, possibly as much as 40 or 50 grams.
The treatment is simple phlebotomy, draining blood from the patient a bit at a time until the iron levels are normal.
Airport metal detectors are basically magnetometers.
They're triggered by metal inducing an electromagnetic current.
For induction to happen, you have to have a continuous piece of metal.
Conversely, the iron atoms in our hemoglobin are chemically bound within large organic ring molecules called hemes.
There is no induction-capable metal in your blood.
This is also why blood is not magnetic, just as rust is not magnetic.
An element's properties are largely determined by its chemical state, and iron-rich hemoglobin has completely different properties than simple iron.
So who the Iron Man was and whether he actually set off a metal detector and what caused it to go off, we don't know.
But we can be pretty sure that the cause was not hemochromatosis, no matter how many web pages say that it was.
Skeptoid Listener Resources Guide 00:01:31
Every Skeptoid episode has complete bibliographic references on its transcript page at skeptoid.com, plus further reading suggestions if you want to know more.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection