All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
May 29, 2012 - Skeptoid
15:47
Skeptoid #312: Student Questions: Marauding Mammoths and Queen Elizabeth the Man

Skeptoid answers another round of questions sent in by students all around the world. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Six Weird Questions Answered 00:07:18
Today we're going to answer six questions that have been sent in by students who heard something weird online or from their friends and wanted to get the skeptoid angle on it.
Among them, we're going to talk about something that's current in the world of science right now.
Can we actually clone and recreate a woolly mammoth, now that we have their genome recovered from frozen individuals?
Student questions are today on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Student Questions, Marauding Mammoths, and Queen Elizabeth the Man.
Today, Skeptoid answers another round of questions sent in by students all around the world.
We're going to examine the value of Bikram yoga, the possibility of bringing extinct animals like the woolly mammoth back to life through cloning, the necessity of thawing chicken properly to avoid kitchen bacteriological warfare, whether Queen Elizabeth I was a man or a woman, whether the consumption of certain foods can influence dreams, and whether the popular medical practice of avoiding cholesterol is indeed a major factor in controlling coronary heart disease.
Let's get started by stretching out in the heat.
Hi, Brian.
Just wanted to get your thoughts on Bikram yoga.
It seems to be getting really popular here in Australia, and the idea that doing yoga in 40-degree heat with high humidity will help does seem a bit strange to me.
The greatest dangers of working out in very hot conditions are dehydration and risk of heat stroke.
You're going to sweat a lot more in such conditions, so you will lose hydration very quickly.
Unless you stay hydrated, you're going to lose more weight, but it's all water weight, and there's no physiological reason that Bikram yoga will produce better weight loss results than any other exercise that burns a similar number of calories.
If you enjoy it and stay hydrated, great, it's probably not going to hurt you, and it's a perfectly good exercise.
Some practitioners claim that the heat loosens your muscles, allowing better stretching, or that it produces benefits similar to applying a hot pack to a tired muscle.
This is false.
Hot packs, or ice packs, need to be placed directly against the skin.
Hot or cold air alone does not conduct enough heat to significantly affect the temperature of your muscle tissue.
If it did, and your body temperature actually did rise, then you would be in hyperthermia, which is a serious medical emergency.
If a Bikram practitioner tells you that the heat is better for your muscles, they don't know what they're talking about and you should leave.
Hello, this is Madeline from New Mexico.
I've heard claims recently of science nearing the point at which it would be able to reanimate extinct species of animals, such as bully mammoths, through the cloning of unimagined bone marrow cells found in the fossils.
Is this a possibility?
Yes, it's theoretically possible, but it's a really difficult problem.
Getting DNA of high enough quality is only a part of the solution, even though it receives the most attention.
When we discover a new frozen mammoth corpse, there's always excitement and speculation about recovering its DNA.
And we have plenty of it.
But that only gets us across the starting line.
The DNA has to be nearly perfect, and then microbiologists must manually create the 50 to 60 different chromosomes that elephants have.
That's a huge project.
And once you have a cell nucleus containing all the chromosomes, you can then replace the contents of the nucleus of a living elephant embryo.
But you'll probably have to do this about 100 times before one will survive.
Healthy clones are even harder to make.
Most artificially cloned animals have died early.
Scientists in Spain once cloned an extinct goat using genetic material extracted while the last surviving specimen was still alive, which allowed them to skip much of the tedious work that awaits mammoth cloners.
However, the goat died after only a few minutes.
It'll probably be done sooner or later, but the smart money is on later.
Hello, Brian.
My name is Alan, and I recently graduated from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
I'm wondering how dangerous it actually is to let chicken thaw out at room temperature.
Many say it's an outright death wish to leave chicken thawing on the kitchen counter even for a few hours.
Now, obviously, warm and moist flesh encourages bacterial growth, but the cooking of the meat kills almost all bacteria.
So assuming one is hygienic when handling the raw meat and there are no toxic bacterial waste products, this sounds like pure hysteria to me.
Could you investigate the matter to see if this zero tolerance for counter-thawing is based on facts?
Thanks.
I have to give a yes and no answer to this.
Yes, completely thorough and proper cooking will kill all of the myriad little bugs that can cause foodborne illness.
But no, it's not just hysteria.
Some of these bacteria are seriously dangerous, and they will multiply quickly once the temperature of the meat is above about 4 degrees Celsius or 40 degrees Fahrenheit.
Having them on your food preparation surfaces where they may come into contact with other foods that will not be cooked is dangerous.
Getting them on your hands or on your knives is dangerous.
So properly thawing your meat is not just hysteria.
It's very sound food safety.
Once the little beasties multiply, they will begin to break down the tissues of the meat as they consume it.
And this is what happens when meat goes bad.
It tastes terrible.
You can indeed cook it to kill everything and eat it safely.
But do you really want to?
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Malaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finish the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
Evidence vs Alternative Medicine 00:08:25
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast, and this ship does always sell out.
Act now, or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hi, Brian.
My name is Tiffany Delagatti, and I'm a graduate student at the University of Connecticut.
Recently, my art history professor has made an unusual claim.
She says there is strong evidence to suggest that Queen Elizabeth I of England was in fact a man.
This sounded incredibly dubious, but she points out the following as evidence.
Balding head, heavy makeup to cover a five o'clock shadow, and dresses that would be impossible for a woman with hips to fit.
What do you think?
Is it possible that she wasn't in fact a woman?
Thanks.
Anything's possible, but that doesn't give it credibility.
Contrary to what your professor says, there's no evidence whatsoever that she was a man, nor any sound reasons to suspect such a thing.
This has to do with confusion over what the word evidence means.
Queen Elizabeth never married and had no children, but this is not evidence that she was a man.
It's merely consistent with the suggestion.
She's usually depicted with a high hairline and wearing a collar that would hide an Adam's apple.
But this is also not evidence.
It's just consistent with the suggestion.
I could just as easily suggest that she was from Mars and point to her pale skin color and call that evidence.
Nothing about Elizabeth's appearance as depicted in paintings is outside the normal range of women's features.
None of the many suitors she had over her lifetime ever noticed anything worth mentioning.
None of her attendants or servants ever raised the alarm.
Outside of a few crank pseudo-historians, no real academics in the field have ever found cause to take this suggestion seriously.
No more than they would take my suggestion that she was from Mars.
Hi, Brian.
This is Mike from the U.S. Army JFK Special Warfare Center in school.
Is there any truth to the claims about various foods such as popcorn and cheese improving or altering one's dreams?
Thanks.
There's probably no biochemical connection between the food you eat and the type of dreams you have.
That would require far more intricate signaling between your digestive system and the cognitive centers of your brain, and our bodies simply don't work that way.
Nutrients make it into your bloodstream in a very gradual and prescribed manner, and by the time that blood is processed and brings oxygen to the brain, no significant information remains about what specific ingredients were in the food.
Smells, however, have been found to creep into dreams.
If someone's cooking bacon for breakfast, you're more likely to dream about bacon.
Similarly, if you ate something especially pungent before bed, or the taste of which is still in your mouth, that lingering smell or flavor can intrude into your dream as well.
Smells also trigger memories, and memories absolutely influence your dreams.
In cases like this, everyone's individual experiences may match certain foods to certain remembered events.
This type of connection between food and dreams is experiential, not biochemical.
Some people point to things like blood sugar affecting adrenaline and this causing an exciting dream.
But these are really all just speculations and not supported by proper research.
The experiential component is probably the most significant driver.
Hey, this is Nico from Northern Illinois University.
I have a question about fat and does it actually cause heart problems?
A lot of people think that it doesn't, and this is based off of the Ansel Keys Seven Countries study, and they believe that the study was actually flawed because a lot of the countries were removed, and I believe they actually studied 21 instead of seven, and then he only actually used seven.
And so a lot of people believe that fat leads to heart problems when, well, according to some other people, that it's actually sugar and carbohydrates that lead to heart problems and not fat.
And they have some pretty good arguments and some good scientific evidence to show this.
So I was wondering if you could comment on this and let people know if this is actually a real thing to be concerned about or if it's just another alternative scheme to, I guess, show people why the mainstream food and drug industry is flawed.
What you're referring to is cholesterol denial, a trend among alternative medicine practitioners who are critical of mainstream medicine's use of statin drugs to treat high cholesterol levels.
Ansel Keys in his seven countries study, which studied correlations between dietary cholesterol and heart disease, ran for 50 years and was largely responsible for the unpopularity of saturated fats.
Cholesterol buildup in the coronary arteries is a major cause of heart disease.
It can be treated any number of ways, including diet and surgery, but also with statin drugs.
Many alternative medicine practitioners reject the findings of science-based medicine, particularly the use of medications.
And perhaps as a result, many have embraced the fringe claims that statin drugs are useless in their imaginary world where cholesterol is not correlated with coronary heart disease.
They direct their focus instead on other causes, which is a textbook example of cognitive dissonance.
They embrace what they should know is bad science because it happens to fit nicely with their ideology.
In this case, the ideology is usually distrust of the pharmaceutical industry.
Unfortunately, the whole subject is a missed opportunity for science-based and alternative practitioners to find common ground.
Both state that a good diet, low unsaturated fats and sugar, plus exercise, is the healthiest lifestyle.
It's unfortunate that at that point, they diverge into an ideological disagreement that does not serve a single patient's interest.
Want a new way to share Skeptoid with a broader audience?
Check out Infact, my video series based on selected Skeptoid episodes.
Come to InfactVideo.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From P R X.
Export Selection