Skeptoid - Skeptoid #203: Therapeutic Touch
Aired: 2010-04-27
Duration: 17:23


=== Hypothetical Energy Fields (07:57) ===

[00:00:03]  It's hard to imagine that something with a name so pleasing as therapeutic touch could be pure pseudoscience.
[00:00:11]  But just start with the fact that it doesn't involve any touching at all.
[00:00:15]  Therapeutic touch, popular among nurses and at nursing schools, requires the practitioner to gently manipulate hypothetical energy fields believed to be floating around the patient's body.
[00:00:29]  Is this something we should point our skeptical eye at?
[00:00:33]  Well, that's what we're doing today on Skeptoid.
[00:00:42]  A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
[00:00:53]  With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
[00:01:00]  And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
[00:01:04]  And now we're even offering a little bit more.
[00:01:06]  If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
[00:01:15]  The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
[00:01:21]  These episodes are a few minutes longer.
[00:01:23]  We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
[00:01:28]  The Extended Premium Show available now.
[00:01:31]  Come to skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
[00:01:42]  You're listening to Skeptoid.
[00:01:43]  I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
[00:01:47]  Therapeutic Touch.
[00:01:49]  Today we're going to point the skeptical eye at a healing modality that's non-invasive, requires no drugs, produces no unpleasant side effects, and is taught in nursing schools everywhere.
[00:02:02]  Therapeutic touch.
[00:02:04]  As it does not actually involve any touching, it's also called distance healing or non-contact therapeutic touch.
[00:02:12]  The method is premised on the presumed existence of an energy field, which practitioners believe extends around the human body and which they believe they can see or touch.
[00:02:24]  Many claiming it's tactile and they can actually feel it.
[00:02:28]  This energy field is then manipulated by waving the hands over the patient's body.
[00:02:33]  Based on a number of varying explanations, this action is said to promote faster healing of wounds, reduce pain or anxiety, or promote wellness in some other way.
[00:02:46]  Therapeutic touch was developed in 1972, a collaboration between a self-described clairvoyant and a nursing professor.
[00:02:54]  Dora Koons was a member of the Theosophy Society in America and soon to become its president.
[00:03:00]  Theosophy is a form of religious mysticism which Koons had studied under the Hungarian psychic healer Oscar Ostebany.
[00:03:08]  Dolores Krieger, who taught nursing at New York University, became engaged with Kuhn's metaphysical approach to healing and codified therapeutic touch into the system that it is today.
[00:03:21]  What sets therapeutic touch apart from most other alternative treatments is its level of acceptance within the medical community.
[00:03:29]  Although it's made no inroads in medical schools or with doctors, it is taught in a surprising number of nursing schools and in continuing education for nurses.
[00:03:39]  This apparent rubber stamp of legitimacy has convinced many that there's something to it.
[00:03:45]  The University of Maryland Medical Center is one hospital that offers therapeutic touch and on its website attempts to explain how they believe it works.
[00:03:55]  They offer two explanations, erroneously describing them as theories.
[00:04:02]  One theory is that the actual pain associated with a physical or emotionally painful experience, such as infection, injury, or a difficult relationship, remains in the body's cells.
[00:04:14]  The pain stored in the cells is disruptive and prevents some cells from working properly with other cells in the body.
[00:04:21]  This results in disease.
[00:04:24]  Practitioners believe therapeutic touch promotes health by restoring communication between cells.
[00:04:31]  I read this five times and still couldn't make any sense of it.
[00:04:35]  Pain remains in the cells?
[00:04:38]  Pain is transmitted by nerves and does not exist in the body outside of nerves.
[00:04:43]  So right off the bat, this makes no medical sense in even a rudimentary way.
[00:04:48]  Then they say this is the cause of disease.
[00:04:51]  No, not exactly.
[00:04:53]  We have very good theories of various diseases and almost all are well understood.
[00:04:58]  And nowhere in the medical texts do we find the pain of difficult relationships remaining in the body's cells.
[00:05:06]  Finally, wrapping this up with the assertion that therapeutic touch promotes health by restoring communication between cells is not, in fact, an explanation of how anything works.
[00:05:18]  It is a nonspecific claim loosely bolstered by a few vaguely medical sounding words.
[00:05:26]  The other theory is based on the principles of quantum physics.
[00:05:31]  As blood, which contains iron, circulates in our bodies, an electromagnetic field is produced.
[00:05:37]  According to this theory, at one time we could all easily see this field, called an aura.
[00:05:43]  But now only certain individuals, such as those who practice therapeutic touch, develop this ability.
[00:05:50]  Ah, yes, the tired old appeal to quantum physics.
[00:05:54]  Mention that phrase and immediately you sound smart.
[00:05:58]  Well, not so much in this case.
[00:06:00]  Circulating iron in the blood creating a magnetic field is not an example of quantum physics.
[00:06:07]  It's also known to be untrue.
[00:06:09]  The tiny amount of iron in our hemoglobin, each molecule of which has a jumbled pole pointing in a different direction, neither creates a magnetic field, nor is there any electromagnetic theory which predicts that it might.
[00:06:22]  And there has never been a sound theory that all humans could at one time see magnetic fields, and no example of anyone ever seeing one.
[00:06:30]  If anyone could, they would essentially be blinded all day by the overwhelming influence of the Earth's magnetic field, which is much stronger than the tiny ones we encounter all day long.
[00:06:42]  Dolores Krieger, one of the co-founders of Therapeutic Touch, offers yet another completely different explanation of how it works.
[00:06:50]  In 1975, she wrote in the American Journal of Nursing that this manipulation of the body's magnetic field raises the body's hemoglobin levels.
[00:07:00]  This statement packs about as many implausible falsehoods into one sentence as I've ever seen.
[00:07:06]  Placing a hand into a magnetic field does not alter that magnetic field.
[00:07:11]  A magnetic field strong enough to extend several inches out from the human body would have to be immensely strong, and we wouldn't be able to wear metal jewelry or get out of our car, and we'd be sticking to each other all day.
[00:07:23]  There is no explanation for how or why any magnetic effects would create hemoglobin, and no report of such a thing ever happening from magnetic resonance imaging or other applications of real magnetic fields to the human body.
[00:07:39]  Finally, raising hemoglobin levels may be an effective therapy for some conditions, but not for pain, which is the primary use of therapeutic touch.
[00:07:48]  One has to marvel at how Krieger, an experienced medical professional, could have strung together such an outlandish chain of nonsense and promoted it as sound science.

=== Skeptical Adventure at Sea (02:54) ===

[00:08:00]  The most famous example of therapeutic touch's basic premise being put to the test was in 1996, when a nine-year-old girl, Emily Rosa, ran an experiment for her fourth-grade science fair.
[00:08:12]  Her parents, who were both critical of therapeutic touch, helped her devise a simple protocol.
[00:08:18]  She visited 15 practitioners who claimed to be able to detect the presence of a human energy field and had them stick both hands through a screen.
[00:08:27]  She then held her own hand directly above one of the practitioners' hands, selected randomly, and the practitioner stated each time which hand detected her field.
[00:08:37]  They failed to guess better than random chance, indicating that practitioners cannot, in fact, do what they claim.
[00:08:45]  The following year, the TV show Scientific American Frontiers filmed her repeating the test with the same results.
[00:08:52]  The year after that, Dr. Stephen Barrett contacted the Rosas and helped them write it up and had the study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
[00:09:01]  This gave young Emily, then 11, the world record for the youngest person to have a scientific paper published in a peer-reviewed journal.
[00:09:14]  Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
[00:09:20]  Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
[00:09:33]  This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
[00:09:48]  We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
[00:09:57]  You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
[00:10:01]  You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
[00:10:12]  We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
[00:10:17]  This is a true sailing ship.
[00:10:19]  You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
[00:10:23]  You can even take the helm and steer.
[00:10:25]  This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
[00:10:29]  But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
[00:10:33]  Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
[00:10:37]  Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
[00:10:43]  Hope to see you on board.
[00:10:45]  That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.

=== Ignoring Better Controlled Studies (06:28) ===

[00:10:54]  As you can imagine, the therapeutic touch community responded harshly.
[00:10:58]  Healing Touch International, which was at the time the leading self-certification institute for practitioners, published an official response to the journal's article with several key criticisms.
[00:11:11]  The published study does not test any critical variables related to therapeutic touch.
[00:11:17]  The ability to sense the energy field of another is simply not a requirement of a therapeutic touch practitioner.
[00:11:25]  This statement that the ability to sense the energy field of another is simply not a requirement is staggering.
[00:11:32]  The entire practice is founded on manipulation of this energy field, which is described by practitioners as tingling, pulling, throbbing, hot, cold, spongy, and tactile as taffy.
[00:11:46]  They've now moved the goalposts.
[00:11:48]  They've gone from sensing and manipulating this alleged energy field to stating that it's not necessary to actually sense anything.
[00:11:56]  How are you supposed to manipulate something you can't detect?
[00:12:00]  Healing Touch International's response to Rosa's study continues.
[00:12:05]  The study design was not representative of a therapeutic touch session.
[00:12:09]  It was set up more as a parlor game.
[00:12:11]  Therapeutic touch studies using people with health problems would most likely demonstrate positive effects.
[00:12:19]  They are correct that Rose's study was not to test the efficacy of therapeutic touch on sick patients.
[00:12:25]  It was about something else.
[00:12:26]  It showed that therapeutic touch's fundamental concept is non-existent.
[00:12:32]  However, the studies they ask for do already exist.
[00:12:35]  The authors of Rose's paper included a literature analysis of 853 such studies.
[00:12:43]  They concluded, There is not a sufficient body of data, both in quality and quantity, to establish therapeutic touch as a unique and efficacious healing modality.
[00:12:53]  With little clinical or quantitative research to support the practice of therapeutic touch, proponents have shifted to qualitative research, which merely compiles anecdotes.
[00:13:04]  Since the publication of Rose's study, the healing touch industry now publishes only research that considers the improvement reported by patients, without regard to the method used.
[00:13:16]  Most therapeutic touch websites cite a small number of studies where a small effect was shown, but ignore the much larger number of larger, better controlled studies that show no effect.
[00:13:28]  This suggests deliberate deception on their part.
[00:13:32]  It's impossible to do an honest search of the literature without happening to notice the saturation of large studies showing no results.
[00:13:41]  The next point in their response The child conducting the study was not neutral about therapeutic touch and therefore could have affected the results.
[00:13:51]  The studies of Dan O'Leary at SUNY Stony Brook have shown the experimenter bias effect in which the beliefs of the experimenter tend to be confirmed.
[00:14:01]  Controlled experiments look like they cannot possibly be affected by the experimenter's beliefs, but O'Leary showed that in the real world, they are.
[00:14:10]  The only thing I can possibly say to this is pot kettle black.
[00:14:14]  Emily Rosa did employ good controls, of which the same cannot be said for the majority of studies that find therapeutic touch to have a beneficial effect.
[00:14:24]  It's fine to point out that she was a child, and it's fine to say that someone else once found that some studies are weakened by experimenter bias.
[00:14:33]  But if you want to poke holes in Rose's study, you have to actually find some.
[00:14:39]  You can't merely insinuate that others have found holes in others' studies.
[00:14:43]  Thus, the child's results are automatically suspect.
[00:14:48]  The editor of the journal said, age doesn't matter.
[00:14:51]  All we care about is good science.
[00:14:53]  This was good science.
[00:14:57]  We could go on all day like this, but it's pointless.
[00:14:59]  The only thing that matters when we evaluate a new treatment is whether it works.
[00:15:04]  The therapeutic touch proponents will quote studies that show that it does work, usually Worth's 1990 study, the effect of non-contact therapeutic touch on the healing rate of full-thickness dermal wounds.
[00:15:17]  But they fail to note that an effect was found in only two of Wirth's five trials.
[00:15:22]  And Worth's own conclusion was the overall results of the series are inconclusive in establishing the efficacy of the treatment interventions examined.
[00:15:32]  The best state of our experimental knowledge is that therapeutic touch does not work.
[00:15:39]  It certainly has no plausible foundation and no physiological reason to suspect that the body's healing mechanisms are dependent upon some outside person waving their hands around.
[00:15:51]  Really, this is one for the kindergarten files, and responsible nurses should look instead to treatments that have credible hope of doing some good.
[00:16:06]  You're listening to Skeptoid.
[00:16:07]  I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
[00:16:16]  Hello, everyone.
[00:16:17]  This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
[00:16:25]  And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
[00:16:34]  And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
[00:16:38]  And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
[00:16:43]  Why support Skeptoid?
[00:16:45]  If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
[00:16:51]  If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
[00:17:05]  Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
[00:17:09]  Next to giggling, of course.
[00:17:11]  Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
[00:17:22]  From PRX.