All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
March 16, 2010 - Skeptoid
16:29
Skeptoid #197: Listener Feedback Strikes Back

Another perilous dive into the listener feedback files. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Fighting Wrong Listener Feedback 00:07:41
This week's Skeptoid episode is another where I seem to have gotten out of bed on the wrong side and just feel like fighting with people who send in wrong feedback.
For example, condescendingly telling me that I should pronounce a certain foreign word the way that dictionary.com's computer voice pronounces it instead of the way a native speaker of that language does.
More listener feedback is coming up next on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Listener feedback strikes back.
Whenever I check my email, I first dig a trench in the snow to fortify my position.
For sure enough, the feedback emails come lumbering in from the distance like great big four-legged robots.
We trade laser-like barbs, but it never settles much.
Generally, I have to bring in the big guns, and one by one, I tie the legs of each email, trip it to the ground, and then blow it up, as I do for you today, now.
Tim from New York took issue with the episode in which I argued that scientists should not agree to public debate with pseudoscience.
My basic reasoning being that the loudest message broadcast by such a debate is that we have two equally plausible and thus debatable possibilities.
And whenever that's not the case, it's counterproductive to science education.
And who decides what is science and what is pseudoscience?
The scientific method?
This column argues that science should be put on the path of ossification and decay.
Yes, that's exactly what I argued.
Well summarized.
Strawman.
You grant yourself a power and status no person can safely have, and no person has the right to grant themselves in any case.
If you don't want to debate someone, fine, don't debate them.
But to refuse to debate them because you've declared they're not scientific, that's a dangerous attitude.
If you think that science consists of one person walking around with a staff and anointing subjects as good science or bad science, like King Arthur Knighting people, you are in error.
The jury is no longer out on the core fundamentals of most sciences.
If the question is whether the Earth is thousands of years old or billions, it is not, quote, dangerous to refuse to give both answers equal status.
One is proven correct through every available line of evidence.
One is proven incorrect.
Proponents of claims that have been long established as invalid by the scientific method don't qualify for renewed status unless and until new science emerges that overturns the basics of what we know.
That does happen, but not very often.
When it does, it happens in the lab, not in a debate.
Going back to my episode on The Bell Witch, I pointed out that the author most responsible for creating the legends used only untraceable sources.
If you want to make a point but don't want anyone else to be able to prove you wrong, cite a source that you know nobody can follow up on.
He did this by quoting only people who had died, and in one case by citing an article from the Saturday Evening Post from a period for which the Post has no existing archives.
T. Hayes from Texas misunderstood what I said.
Interesting, but I'd take issue with the comment that the Saturday Evening Post article was a fabrication.
If the Post says that articles for that year are lost, you don't know that it didn't exist.
And just because Jack looked on either side of the target year proves nothing.
Although the Saturday Evening Post themselves had no records for 1849, others do.
There are many other records.
Researcher Jack Cook went to public libraries that maintained their own microfiche archives and looked through all of 1849 and even extended his search to several years surrounding it.
T. Hayes may have misunderstood my wording and thought that Jack Cook looked only at the surrounding years and not at 1849 itself, which would be silly.
I wouldn't have said Cook confirmed no such article existed if the search had been anything other than comprehensive using complete archives.
S. Maples from Anywhere, obviously a distributor for the multi-level marketing Kangan water filters, had a comment about Dr. Stephen Lauer, a retired chemist from Simon Fraser University who maintains the excellent Aquascams website.
First of all, Dr. Stephen Lauer is a quack in his own right, and many of his claims are not exactly correct.
Oh, okay, please enlighten us.
Furthermore, this water, and specifically Kangan water, or not, has been promoted by people with much greater credibility, including Dr. Hiromi Shinya, who invented the colonoscopy.
That aside, my uncle overcame type 2 diabetes, all caps, and prostate cancer on this water and made his doctor a believer in this.
I would say that beware of sites like these whose whole purpose is to debunk.
Some of these guys have even been caught on the payroll of Big Pharma.
It's always refreshing to hear something new and clever like I'm on the payroll of Big Pharma.
Dr. Shinya's biggest contribution to gastroenterology was indeed the use of endoscopes to perform the first polypectomies at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York in 1969.
But after his retirement, like some other scientists, he pretty much descended into crankhood.
He's now best known as the author of a book in Japan called Living Without Disease, A Miracle Enzyme Determines Life, in which he proposes that a single miracle enzyme, unknown to medical science, can cure all diseases and produces longevity.
Its English translation, the Enzyme Factor, is now regularly trotted out by people selling all manner of medical quackery.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
Real Pronunciation and Medicine 00:08:45
We set sail from Malagas, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating, skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts, and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert, sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast, and this ship does always sell out.
Act now, or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
My pronunciation of foreign words continues to be a common theme in the listener feedback inbox.
Jason from California seems unaware that I've thought of this.
As a point of professionalism, you may want to consider using dictionary.com, which is free and even has an audio feature so you can hear the word, just to make sure you don't completely butcher names that you don't definitively know how to pronounce.
All I could do was cringe every time I heard the mispronunciation, and it turned out to be so distracting that the episode was almost impossible to listen to.
For those interested in knowing the proper pronunciation of Antikythira, please go check it out at dictionary.com.
Thanks, Jason.
I hate to disappoint you, but the way I pronounced Antikythira in the episode is the way it's pronounced in Greek.
I have a native Greek research assistant.
You can also find travel videos about the island in Greek on YouTube if you want further confirmation.
Services like dictionary.com are rarely correct for foreign words.
I almost always have to go to a native speaking source.
An exception in this episode was Archimedes, where I chose to use the much more familiar but wrong American pronunciation.
Not that I'm able to pronounce them, but at least I do always get the correct pronunciation in a native speaker's audio and practice it before recording.
I also did this with Chinese and Thai in my episodes on the Baigong Pipes and the Naga Fireballs.
Here's Antikythera spoken by a native Greek.
I got as close to that as my sloppy Greno tongue would conveniently allow me.
But here's the dictionary.com version Jason recommends.
Antikythera.
This highlights a problem with using common internet sites as authorities for anything.
Wikipedia, Dictionary.com, and even Google are fine starting points, but you should never consider them the final word on anything.
I certainly don't.
Contrary to popular opinion, I'm not entirely reckless in my production of Skeptoid.
Cody from Austin, Texas felt my discussion of shadow people was a bit reckless, though.
To dismiss any and all experiences of shadow person encounters by hundreds of thousands of people all over the world as foolish, drug-induced, or simply sleep paralysis seems to be bounding above and beyond skepticism and landing in the realm of ignorance.
I, however, for the past six months, have had three entities residing in my apartment, felt and seen by both myself and my fiancée.
My mom finally came over.
It didn't take 20 minutes for her to feel the presence and break down in tears by the heaviness and darkness she felt at my place.
The beings are shadow people, and they are very real.
Basically, I just want to hear you guys debunk these experiences that so many people are having without calling it sleep paralysis, which I have, not the same thing.
Stupid or imagined.
Cody, I would love to come and check that out, but since you're several states away, it's probably not going to happen.
You challenge me to debunk it based on your email.
First of all, your email does not constitute testable evidence that can be meaningfully studied.
Second, debunking is quite an insulting term.
It presumes that I've already concluded your claim is bunk.
I cannot possibly reach any such conclusion based on your email alone.
If you're serious, shoot and send me some videos.
If they're compelling enough, it wouldn't surprise me if we could put together a budget to send some folks to study what's going on.
Simon from Seattle disagreed with my recommendation that moderation is usually better than complete reliance or overindulgence on anything when I discussed more medical myths.
It bugged me more than it should that Mr. Dunning repeated the popular trope about moderation being key.
My real beef with it is that I usually hear it being used to make lazy equivalences between true and false claims.
You should pursue moderation between allopathic and homeopathic medicine, Western medicine and spiritual healing, skepticism and credulity, etc.
The saying moderation in all things implies that you shouldn't rely on proven solutions and that you should devote some time and money to every half-baked idea that you're presented with.
Yes, Simon, you've correctly interpreted my advice.
I'm always saying that everyone should moderately indulge in every half-baked idea.
Good analysis.
To the less spastic and reactionary listeners, I clarify that moderation in all things refers to all the things you indulge in, not those plus everything else in the world.
Ron from Grand Rapids, Michigan had this response to my episode on nuclear energy.
I would love to hear Mr. Dunning's take on the Cellafield nuclear power plant and the damage supposedly done to the Irish Sea.
Personally, I don't think the issue is as open and shut as he would have you believe.
Maybe he's angling for a job at Halliburton.
Because Halliburton is desperate to expand into the high-profit world of podcasting.
What he's talking about was a facility hurriedly built by the British in the closing stages of World War II to make plutonium for the war effort.
It was not a nuclear power plant, though later power plants were built there.
For about 10 years in the 1940s and 1950s, it discharged some of its low-level waste into the ocean, which was thought to be safe at the time.
That process has never been part of power-generating reactors, so this has no relevance to the subject, Ron.
And finally, Lena from the UK has some thoughts on my episode about New Age Energy that we'll include just for fun.
Disinfo agent.
Loads of them out there.
They just don't want us to know the truth.
People are waking up.
We don't need articles like this to tell us what energy is or isn't.
Brian, you should listen more to your healer friend.
Someone should make me a disinformation agent badge that I can go around and flash.
Then I can follow Lena around and try to keep her from knowing the truth, to freak her out.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection