All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Oct. 27, 2009 - Skeptoid
19:19
Skeptoid #177: The Bloop

This mysterious sound captured by NOAA hydrophones was not a sea monster. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Mysterious Bloop Sound 00:09:58
Imagine you're sitting at the hydrophone console aboard the research ship and you hear a powerful sound shatter the depths of the sea.
But it's not like any sound you've ever heard before.
More than anything, it sounds like the vocalization of an immense sea creature, larger than anything ever known.
Sound bizarre?
Believe it or not, this actually happened back in 1997.
The bloop is today on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The extended premium show available now.
Come to skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
The Bloop.
It came from the depths of the South Pacific.
Throughout the summer of 1997, a sound never before recorded burst from the abyss.
News agencies scrambled, was this some new leviathan, an unknown monster from the deep?
Nobody knew.
And though this recording has taken its place among the permanent fixtures of the Museums of the Strange, the bloop has never been identified.
The bloop was on the loud side, to be sure.
It was picked up on multiple sensors as far as 5,000 kilometers away.
By triangulation, we know it came from somewhere right around 50 degrees south 100 west, which is about 1750 kilometers west of Chile in the South Pacific.
It's about as remote as you can get in any ocean.
There are no islands or anything anywhere near it.
The water's deep there, very deep, averaging around 4,300 meters.
The bloop was recorded several times during 1997 on the Eastern Equatorial Pacific Autonomous Hydrophone Array, which was deployed in May 1996 by NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, for long-term monitoring of seismic events on the East Pacific Rise.
Here's the Bloop sound, as released by NOAA and widely available on the internet.
Here is a cleaned up version.
But the version released by NOAA has been sped up 16 times.
I tried and tried to find an original real-time version, but could not.
A few people have taken the sped up version and slowed it down to 1/16th speed, but the results are usually pretty bad.
93% of the data is gone, so expectations have to be pretty low.
Here is the best real-time version I could find, but be aware it's low frequency and you might not be able to hear it without a good subwoofer.
Cryptozoologists love the bloop because to them it is evidence pointing to the existence of a gigantic unknown creature.
Virtually every web page about the bloop, and there are a lot of them, repeats this same quote word for word.
Though it matches the audio profile of a living creature, there is no known animal that could have produced the sound.
If it is an animal, it would have to be huge, much larger than even a blue whale, according to scientists who have studied the phenomenon.
I've been unable to find the original source of this quote.
Only one website on which I found it gave an attribution, saying it was a quote from NOAA.
However, this text does not appear on any NOAA websites, and its wording is inconsistent with NOAA's typical descriptions of unknown sounds.
When a sound is unknown, NOAA says it's unknown and leaves it at that.
It is not their habit to editorialize or hypothesize about giant cryptids.
So, for now, the identity of these, quote, scientists who have studied the phenomenon remains a mystery.
Many cryptozoologists have written about the bloop, as is easily shown by a simple Google search, but from what I could tell, few legitimate zoologists have, and none who have concluded the bloop has a biological origin.
Fortunately, we are not entirely without our own resources to test this suggestion that the bloop, quote, matches the audio profile of a living creature.
There are three basic types of sounds in the oceans.
Natural sounds like volcanoes and earthquakes, biological sounds from sea creatures, and man-made sounds from boats or other machinery.
Usually, you can take your unknown sound and compare it to a selection of known sounds and get a pretty good idea what it is.
Sounds can be represented on colorful graphs called spectrograms.
Time is one dimension and frequency is the other.
The amplitude is represented by the color.
An ongoing sound with a certain frequency range, like a boat engine, creates a solid band across the spectrogram.
A chirp from a dolphin would make a little streak.
This gives us a two-pronged approach to trying to match the bloop to a known source.
We can listen to it to get a subjective feel for it, and we can also compare its spectrogram to known spectrograms to get a firmer, more quantifiable comparison.
Let's take a look at the bloop's spectrogram.
You can see the spectrograms for all of these sounds in the online transcript for this episode at skeptoid.com.
The first thing you notice about the bloop is that it's pretty broad-spectrum sound.
For its duration, it pretty much covers the frequencies from about 10 to 45 Hz.
It's a well-defined vertical smudge.
If we take a look at the spectrograms for some other known sources, we should be able to pick out which sounds have this same general profile.
The Atlantic finback whale does.
It makes a series of chirps, and each chirp looks visually quite similar to the bloop.
Here's what it sounds like.
That sound is sped up also, 10 times.
All the sounds we're going to listen to have been sped up by NOAA, since they're mostly subsonic in real time.
Whales are no exception.
These finback chirps are between 20 and 30 hertz, at the extreme lowest end of what humans can hear.
Note the finback's 10 hertz spread is much narrower than the bloop's 35 hertz spread.
We might expect this if the bloop is indeed some unknown gigantic sea creature.
But when we listen to the sounds subjectively, it's easy to hear that the finback has a clear voice-like tone, while the bloop simply sounds like bubbles.
Quite different.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Another possible candidate is the South Pacific blue whale.
Its spectrogram also makes a vertical smudge for each syllable, if we can use the word syllable.
Blue Whale Candidates 00:07:09
But the blues smudges are less well-defined and have clear bands of dominant frequencies.
Have a listen.
Here's another blue, this one from the North Pacific.
This one's spectrogram is not a single vertical stroke.
Instead, it's a series of short horizontal strokes stacked in a vertical column.
It vocalizes on several frequencies at once.
But interestingly, both blue whales cover the same frequency range as the bloop, about 10 to 45 Hz.
While that's interesting, it only tells us so much.
First, the sounds are clearly different.
The bloop is noisy, the whale is a clear tone.
Second, a lot of things in the sea are in that range.
Here's the sound of a small ship, again sped up 10 times, and it's also about 10 to 45 Hz.
But there are major differences between the ship and the bloop.
The ship is a constant tone, while the bloop is a single, well, bloop.
Here it is again so you don't forget it.
Some large creatures are well outside of 10 to 45 Hz.
The humpback whale is just one example.
Its range goes from the subsonic all the way up to about 450 Hz.
And like the other whales, the humpback has a clear tone in its voice.
Even the whales who have weird patterns have a distinct voice-like tone.
Listen to this Atlantic Minky Whale.
Another thing that I notice is that whales don't just make a single chirp and are then silent for weeks or months.
All the whales have songs or sentences or whatever you want to call them.
They vocalize with a series of sounds, like every animal I can think of.
They do it frequently and they do it every day.
This is, to my mind, the most significant difference between known vocalizations and the bloop.
If the bloop is made by an animal, it's an animal that only had a few words to say, ever, in its whole life, and it said a single word once a month or so for part of 1997, and then never said anything else in more than a decade.
This is just not the way animals vocalize.
This doesn't prove anything, but it's meaningful enough that, based on this alone, I would probably put my money on the bloop being anything other than a living creature.
Not a conclusion, just a hunch.
Not that that helps narrow it down much.
The bloop is a pretty poor match for the natural sounds we have recordings of.
Listen to this undersea earthquake.
That's a horrible match, both audibly and visually.
Clearly, it doesn't sound anything like the bloop, and the earthquake's spectrogram is a hazy, blurry wedge, starting out with full spectrum noise from 0 to 60 hertz and fading out down to just 0.
Volcanic activity is also a bad match.
Listen to this undersea volcanic eruption, and remember, like the bloop, this is also sped up 16 times.
The frequency range is pretty close to the bloop, say 10 to 40 hertz, but it has no clear distinct pattern.
It's just a lot of vague noise.
So, while there are substantial differences between the bloop and anything else we can think of, the bloop is really not all that unique.
Sources that promote it as some kind of rare mystery often fail to point out that NOAA libraries contain lots of sounds that are unidentified, and the bloop is just one.
Many of these have spectrograms that also consist of clean, well-defined shapes.
Listen to this one, nicknamed the train, with a whistle at about 35 Hz.
Or this one, nicknamed Julia.
Tell me this doesn't sound like a weird vocalization.
If oceanographers classify Julia as unknown, with its relatively obvious similarity to a whale, it's less surprising that the bloop is so classified.
Here's another one whose spectrogram looks quite a lot like the finback whale, and it seems to be chattering along quite happily.
NOAA calls this one the upsweep.
Here's another one called the slowdown.
Slowdown has a clear voice and a clear spectrogram, much more like a whale than the bloop.
So be skeptical of news reports or websites that parrot the unsourced claim that the bloop, quote, matches the audio profile of a living creature.
It doesn't really.
And there are other unknown sounds that sound a lot more like an animal.
And I can think of half a dozen phenomena off the top of my head for which I couldn't find recordings or spectrograms that might be good candidates to explain the bloop.
What about undersea releases of natural gas bubbles?
What about deep-sea vents?
What about some kind of man-made activity, a submarine blowing a ballast tank or releasing some undersea weapon or machine?
I make no pretense at being able to explain the bloop.
NOAA experts far more knowledgeable than I have been unable to classify it.
Skeptoid's Final Verdict 00:02:07
What I do know and what I encourage you to consider is that no good explanation is very well supported.
Certainly not the pop culture version that CNN would have us jump to, that it's a giant sea monster.
Sometimes the only way to be right is to simply say, I don't know yet.
Come to skeptoid.com for information about my newest live show, Sounds from Beyond, a fun-filled hour packed with weird actual recordings and strange sounds just like these.
Guaranteed to educate and amuse as we apply scientific thinking to learn exactly what these phenomena really are.
Come to skeptoid.com and click on Live Shows.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection