All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 29, 2008 - Skeptoid
16:12
Skeptoid #111: Should Tibet Be Free?

Misinformation and fantasy surrounds the popular Tibet notions. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Freeing Tibet Origins 00:09:01
For decades now, campaigns advocating to free Tibet have flourished in Western countries.
But there's one place where they haven't flourished.
Tibet.
Why not?
Well, the reason may surprise you.
Freeing Tibet originated with Westerners.
It is not the goal of the Dalai Lama and the rest of the ruling monk class in exile.
What they want is far more subtle and more profitable.
Freeing Tibet is coming up now on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and we'll replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Should Tibet be free?
Perhaps an equally important question is, should a science podcast take on a political topic?
For a long time, listeners have been sending me requests to do an episode about Tibet.
And for a long time, I've been putting these requests into a folder and keeping it stored away.
This is Skeptoid, not politicaloid.
And my purpose is not to advocate one side or the other in political questions, where you have two sides that are perfectly valid to different groups of people.
But the more requests I've received, the more I've realized that there is a lot of misinformation, if not true pseudoscience, surrounding Tibet.
There is undoubtedly a set of popular pop culture beliefs out there based entirely upon made-up crap that bears little resemblance to reality.
Mind you, I'm not saying, hey, you've heard one side, let me give you the other side, because that's the job of a political commentator.
What I'm saying today is, here is the reality of Tibet.
Go forth and form whatever opinion you like.
But base it on reality, not on made-up metaphysical nonsense.
I'm encouraging you to apply skepticism to the reasons you may have heard for freeing Tibet.
Like most Americans, I grew up watching video of the Chinese army taking howitzers and destroying the massive centuries-old Tibetan monasteries in 1959.
And that's an indisputable crime against history, religious freedom, and the dignity of Tibetans.
And then I watched video of the Dalai Lama, the exiled spiritual and political leader of the Tibetan people, in his red and yellow robes, speaking words of wisdom and brotherhood and freedom and peace.
And I'll freely admit, for nearly all of my life, this was the extent of my knowledge of the Tibet situation.
Violence and cruelty from the Chinese, innocence and beauty from the Tibetans.
I believe that many Westerners, including many who fervently wave free Tibet placards, have little knowledge of the situation any deeper than that.
But isn't it likely that there's more to it than that?
Isn't it equally disrespectful of the Tibetans as it is of the Chinese to attempt to encompass who and what they are with those tiny little pictures?
A complete history lesson is impossible here, but here's a quick overview of the points relevant to today's discussion.
China and Tibet have a long and complicated history.
In 1950, China invaded to assert its claim and ruled by trying to win hearts and minds, building roads and public utilities, and allowing the Tibetan system of feudal serfdoms to remain largely intact.
In 1959, the Tibetan ruling class revolted, prompting a Chinese crackdown that sent the Dalai Lama and most other Tibetan aristocrats into exile in India, where they remain to this day.
The former serfs became ordinary Chinese citizens, and Tibet is now an autonomous region in China, a status that many describe as actually less autonomous than an ordinary Chinese province.
From his palace in India, the Dalai Lama now travels the world in a private jet, hobnobbing with the wealthy and powerful, fundraising and writing highly successful books on metaphysics.
Recently, there were some anti-China pro-Tibet protests in Nepal, a neighboring independent nation.
This is illegal in Nepal, and the authorities have been cracking down on it.
Why does Nepal side with China on this issue?
Because they depend heavily on Chinese aid to survive, and this is a requirement that China imposes, though they call it a request.
At first glance, you might be shocked that an independent nation would give up its freedom of speech to make a deal with the devil.
But that's an easy opinion to form when you're not hungry.
It makes sense for Nepal to agree to these terms, because their back is against the wall.
They need China's aid.
As for China imposing this condition, well, that's one for you to chalk up in your column of things China Needs to Reconsider.
So why doesn't China simply give Tibet the same treatment they give Nepal?
Let them be an independent nation, give them aid and just require them to say only nice things about them.
Well, Nepal has long been an independent nation.
Tibet hasn't.
The history of China's rule over Tibet is exceptionally complicated and goes back many centuries.
Anyone who tells you that either Tibet is historically part of China, or that Tibet is historically free, is making a disingenuous oversimplification.
Personally, I choose to discount this subject completely, and not because it's too intricate to make a clear decision.
I discount it because practically every square inch of land on the planet has been taken over militarily or annexed or stolen in one way or another from one people by another people.
We don't give California back to the Spanish, and we don't give Italy back to Norway.
Ancient history is not the way to settle current border disputes.
To find a meaningful settlement that makes sense for people today, you have to consider Tibet to be a current border dispute.
So while we're chalking up China's claim of ancient possession in the column of Things China Needs to Reconsider, let's also chalk up Tibet's claim of ancient autonomy in the column of Things Tibet Needs to Shut Up About.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together, get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
And once we open up that column, we find it's a Pandora's box.
Charges Against Chinese Oppression 00:05:51
Advocates of a free Tibet make a long list of charges against Chinese oppression, largely centered upon a loss of rights and freedom.
This claim makes anyone familiar with Tibetan history cough up their coffee.
The only people who lost any rights under Chinese rule are Tibet's former ruling class, themselves guilty of cruelty and oppression of a magnitude that not even China can conceive.
The vast majority of Tibetans, some 90% of whom were serfs, have enjoyed a relative level of freedom unheard of in their culture.
Until 1950, when the Chinese put a stop to it, 90% of Tibetans had no rights at all.
They were freely traded and sold.
They were subject to the worst type of punishments from their lords, including gouging out of eyes, cutting off hands, feet, tongues, noses, or lips, and a dozen horrible forms of execution.
There was no such concept as legal recourse.
The landowning monk class was the law.
There was no such thing as education, medical care, sanitation, or public utilities.
Young boys were frequently and freely taken from families to endure lifelong servitude, including rape, in the monasteries.
Amid all the pop culture cries about Chinese oppression, why is there never any mention of the institutionalized daily oppression levied by the Dalai Lama's class prior to 1959?
Free Tibet advocates also point to the destruction of Tibetan culture.
This charge is particularly bizarre.
The only art produced in Tibet prior to 1950 was limited to the output of a few monks in each monastery, principally drawings of monasteries.
New literature had not been produced in Tibet for centuries.
Since the 1959 uprising, art and literature in Tibet have both flourished, now that the entire population is at liberty to produce.
Tibet even has its share of well-known poets, authors, and internationally known artists now.
But make no mistake about China's history of human rights failings.
China's Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution programs from 1958 through 1976 were as disastrous for Tibet as they were for the rest of China.
There can never be any excuse for the deliberate wide-scale destruction of life, liberty, and property during those years.
Hundreds of thousands of Tibetans and tens of millions of Chinese lost their lives during this misguided pretense at reform.
This was a phase that China went through, and it's arguable that Tibet would have been spared this torment if they had been independent at the time.
But for your average Tibetan in the field, a serf with no rights, living and working and dying at the whim of his lord, were those decades really worse than they would have been without China.
There's no way to know, but to a skeptical mind, it's not a slam dunk that China's cultural revolution was harder on Tibet than Tibet's ruling class had always been in the past.
If we think back to our list of red flags to identify misinformation, cultural campaigns and celebrity endorsements should always trigger your skeptical radar.
Few campaigns are as near and dear to the hearts of Hollywood activists as freeing Tibet.
Notable Tibet advocates include Sharon Stone, Richard Gere, Paris Hilton, and the great political science scholar Lindsey Lohan.
Journalist Christopher Hitchens notes that when on his trips to Hollywood fundraisers, the Dalai Lama anoints major donors like Stephen Seagal and Richard Gere as holy.
Being anointed as holy probably does great things for your social standing within Hollywood, but it should not be considered evidence of expertise.
I'll bet that if you asked either Stephen Seagal or Paris Hilton to lecture on the events of the Lhasa Uprising of 1959, you'd find that neither knows even the most basic information about the cause they so passionately advocate.
Just because Hollywood celebrities promote a viewpoint doesn't mean they're qualified to do so, something that, unbelievably, still seems to escape most people.
Furthermore, the people shouting loudest about freeing Tibet don't seem to be aware that that's not even what the Dalai Lama wants from China.
He's not seeking full independence, Nepal style.
Rather, he would like to achieve the same status as Hong Kong, which is a special administrative region.
This would give them full economic benefits without having to become a regular province, something along the lines of a U.S. territory.
So here's a note to all the Hollywood celebrities.
If you really want to support the Dalai Lama, ditch your free Tibet signs and paint some up that say, change Tibet from an autonomous region to a special administrative region.
It's not as good of a soundbite, and it's a change that would have little practical impact on Tibetans, but it would allow the Dalai Lama to return to his aristocratic lifestyle and his 1,000-room palace at Patala.
So to all those who so heatedly call for the freeing of Tibet, first consider whether you have the expertise to know whether Tibet is best served as an autonomous region or as a special administrative region.
Understand exactly what implications such a change may have upon the economics and the daily lives of its citizens, or maybe even entertain the possibility that it's a decision best left to Tibetans.
Tim Horton's Double Doubles 00:01:16
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as five US dollars per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrian Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection